78-525: Sutil may refer to: Adrian Sutil , German Formula One racing driver Francisco Sutil , Spanish professional football player Sutil (ship) , a Spanish ship Sutil (album) , an album by pop singer Charytín Sutil Channel , a channel in British Columbia Cape Sutil , the northernmost point of Vancouver Island Sutil Island , a named rock near Santa Barbara Island Topics referred to by
156-473: A wound is an injury that breaks the continuity of the skin . There must be a division of the whole skin and not merely a division of the cuticle or upper layer. A single drop of blood is sufficient, but it must fall outside the body: see JJC (a minor) v. Eisenhower (1984) 78 Cr App R 48. In this case, a pellet gun was fired at the victim. The bullet ruptured blood vessels above his eye, causing his eye to fill with fluid. Lord Justice Robert Goff said
234-467: A "coward." Sutil remained without a seat throughout 2012. Adrian Sutil is a prolific car collector, owning a large collection of significant and expensive cars. He has the largest car collection of any Formula 1 driver past or present. Sutil's car collection includes: On 30 July 2020, Sutil crashed his McLaren Senna LM into an electricity pylon at the side of the road in Monaco after losing control of
312-527: A German, and Jorge, a Uruguayan . He has two brothers, named Daniel and Raphael. He weighs 75 kilograms (165 pounds) and is 180 centimeters (6 feet) tall. A talented pianist , Sutil speaks fluent German , English , and Spanish and a little Italian . On the evening following the April 2011 Chinese Grand Prix , Sutil was involved in an incident with Genii Capital CEO and owner of the Lotus F1 team Eric Lux in
390-530: A collision with the Toyota of Jarno Trulli. Out of control on the wet grass outside Turn 5, Trulli hit Sutil, and then slid back onto the track and struck Alonso's Renault , resulting in all three being out of the race. Trulli blamed Sutil for pushing him outside the track at the fifth corner and thus causing the accident, and furiously berated the German at the side of the track in full-view of worldwide TV cameras. This time
468-455: A good race together and I don't think the Force Indias will necessarily be at the bottom of the timesheets this season." In Australia , after starting from 16th on the grid, Sutil progressed steadily through the field to finish just outside the points in 9th place. In Malaysia , he qualified 19th and finished 15th when the race was stopped on lap 33 due to torrential rain. In China , Sutil
546-522: A large proportion of the audience were seized by panic and rushed in fright down the staircase forcing those in front against the iron bar; he "inflicted" injuries which resulted by reason of the pressure and struggling of the crowd thus created on the staircase. David Ormerod said that the effect of the decision in R v Gibbins and Proctor appears to be that the offence of causing grievous bodily harm under section 18 can be committed by an omission. In R v Mandair , Lord Mackay of Clashfern LC said, with
624-547: A misdemeanor, and being convicted thereof shall be liable ... to be kept in penal servitude ... The words omitted were repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1892 , as for section 18. In Northern Ireland, it reads: Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm upon any other person, either with or without any weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of an offence and liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for
702-714: A nightclub in Shanghai . Sutil struck Lux with a champagne glass, causing a wound in his neck which required 24 stitches. Sutil apologised for the incident, which he described as unintentional. Lux's lawyers filed a criminal complaint for physical assault and grievous bodily harm against Sutil. Force India owner Vijay Mallya refused to take action against Sutil until the case proceeded further, but on 16 December 2011 Force India announced they had opted not to renew Sutil's contract for 2012, and would field reserve driver Nico Hülkenberg alongside di Resta. On 13 January 2012, German prosecutors announced that Sutil would stand trial over
780-419: A panic at a theatre whereby people trampled on one another: Reg. v. Martin . (1) 8 Q. B. D. 54 The prisoner in that case did what was certain to make people crush one another, perhaps to death, and the grievous bodily harm was as truly inficted by him as if he had hurled a stone at someone's head. Take also the illustration of my brother Stephen, of a man who digs a pit for another to fall into, whereby that other
858-412: A properly directed jury could not in the circumstances have come to any other conclusion than that the appellant must have been aware that what he was doing was likely to cause physical injury to the victim. In practice, malice in the case of these offences means no more than foresight of the risk of bodily harm: R v Barnes [2005] 1 Cr App R 30. Section 18 has two separate mens rea requirements and
SECTION 10
#1732845499504936-466: A range of injuries: R v Woodland (2007) 48 MVR 360. However, R v Saunders [1985] Crim LR 230, [1985] LS Gaz R 1005, allows "serious injury" as a sufficient direction to the jury . It is for the judge to decide whether the word "really" needs to be used in their direction to the jury: R v Janjua and Choudhury [1999] 1 Cr App R 91, The Times, 8 May 1998, CA (in this case, as a knife with a blade at least 5 + 1 ⁄ 2 inches long had been used, it
1014-425: A result, the appellant was guilty of an offence under section 20. The appellant was acquitted of the offence under section 18, but convicted of offences under section 20. The Court of Appeal held that an intention to frighten was not enough to constitute the necessary mens rea for section 20, and that the direction to the contrary effect was a misdirection. However, they dismissed the appellant's appeal. They said that
1092-565: A term not exceeding 7 years. This was subject to the same omissions as in England; the Criminal Justice (No. 2) (Northern Ireland) Order 2004 enacted the other amendments. The distinction between felony and misdemeanor was abolished by the Criminal Law Act 1967 . Accordingly, "guilty of felony" is to be read as "guilty of an offence". The Criminal Law Act (Northern Ireland) 1967 provided
1170-540: A time when the prisoner knew, but his wife did not know, that he was suffering from gonorrhoea , he had "connection" with her; that the result was that the disease was communicated to her, and that had she been aware of the prisoner's condition she would not have submitted to the intercourse. Clarence's conviction under section 20 was quashed by the Court for Crown Cases Reserved by a majority of 9 to 4. Wills , A. L. Smith , and Stephen JJ specifically said that they thought
1248-586: Is a term used in English criminal law to describe the severest forms of battery . It refers to two offences that are created by sections 18 and 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 . The distinction between these two sections is the requirement of specific intent for section 18; the offence under section 18 is variously referred to as "wounding with intent" or "causing grievous bodily harm with intent ", whereas
1326-518: Is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Adrian Sutil Adrian Sutil ( German pronunciation: [ˈaːdʁiaːn zʊˈtiːl] ; born 11 January 1983) is a German racing driver , who competed in Formula One from 2007 to 2014 . Born and raised in Starnberg , Sutil started karting aged 14 and moved into single seater racing in 2002 in
1404-502: Is injured. I do not think that this section was ever intended to apply to the administration of poison, and most of the arguments I have used to shew that sexual offences were not intended to be dealt with in s. 47 apply with equal force to s. 20. The Court for the consideration of Crown Cases Reserved in Reg. v. Taylor (1) Law Rep. 1 C. c. R. 194. decided that in the offence of "unlawfully and maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm", an assault
1482-466: Is necessarily included. So far as the decision is concerned, the same question may be said to arise under s. 20 as under s. 47. But I think the argument is even stronger here, for the context seems to me to shew that direct personal violence of some kind was intended, so that even if the constructive assault contended for by those who support a conviction under s. 47 were established, a conviction under this section would still be wrong. Stephen J said: But
1560-443: Is not enough (see R v Sullivan ). In R v Sullivan [1981] Crim LR 46, CA , the appellant was tried on charges of causing grievous bodily harm with intent and inflicting grievous bodily harm. The victim said that the appellant and a companion were drunk. He said that while he was in a street that was eight feet wide and had a narrow pavement, the appellant drove a car through that street at twenty-five to thirty miles an hour, mounted
1638-409: Is there an "infliction of bodily harm either with or without any weapon or instrument"? I think not for the following reasons. The words appear to me to mean the direct causing of some grievous injury to the body itself with a weapon, as by a cut with a knife, or without a weapon, as by a blow with the fist, or by pushing a person down. Indeed, though the word "assault" is not used in the section, I think
SECTION 20
#17328454995041716-460: Is therefore an offence of specific rather than basic intent. In R v Belfon [1976] 1 WLR 741, the Court of Appeal confirmed that references to mere foresight or recklessness that harm was likely to result are sufficient for the element "unlawfully and maliciously inflict/cause" for the basic intent in both sections 18 and 20 but insufficient for the specific element. The intention either to cause or to resist arrest must be proved subjectively, say, in
1794-795: The Belgian Grand Prix , the strengths of the B-spec car were fully evident with both Sutil and Yamamoto setting competitive times through the three practice sessions culminating in Sutil qualifying only half a second behind 16th placed man Vitantonio Liuzzi . During the race, Sutil passed the Toyota of Jarno Trulli , Hondas of Rubens Barrichello and Jenson Button as well as the Red Bull 's David Coulthard , Toro Rosso 's Vitantonio Liuzzi and Williams driver Alexander Wurz . He ran as high as 12th before finishing 14th. He
1872-614: The British Grand Prix , missing out on the final points-scoring position, held by Jaime Alguersuari , by just 0.6 seconds. At his home race , Sutil took a season best finish of sixth place, after implementing a different strategy to some of the drivers around him on the grid, making just two pit stops to the three made by his rivals. Despite qualifying in the top ten in Hungary , Sutil could only finish 14th, before another points-scoring finish – finishing seventh, after starting 15th on
1950-604: The Criminal Law Act 1967 . The words omitted in the penultimate place ("at the discretion of the court") were repealed by the Statute Law Revision (No. 2) Act 1893 . The words omitted at the end were repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1892 (words limiting penal servitude to at least three years, or imprisonment to at most two years, and removing mention of hard labour) and the Statute Law Revision (No. 2) Act 1893 (words prescribing imprisonment as an alternative to penal servitude). This section replaces section 4 of
2028-522: The Midland F1 test team, Sutil was promoted to a race seat for the new Spyker F1 team in 2007. Sutil continued to race with the team under their new guise Force India in 2008 where he remained until 2011. Having made his return to the sport in 2013 again with Force India , he competed in the 2014 season with the Sauber team. Born in Starnberg , West Germany , Sutil is the son of professional musicians Monika,
2106-418: The Offences against the Person Act 1837 , which in turn replaced section 12 of the Offences against the Person Act 1828 , which in turn replaced section 1 of Lord Ellenborough's Act (1803). In England and Wales, section 20 now reads: Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously wound or inflict any grievous bodily harm upon any other person, either with or without any weapon or instrument, shall be guilty of
2184-611: The Sauber cars being disqualified from the race, having finished eleventh on the road. In Malaysia , Sutil finished eleventh, just behind di Resta, and in China , he qualified eleventh. In Monaco , he had his best result of the season, finishing seventh. He retired in Canada after hitting a wall, which resulted in damage to his car's suspension. A ninth-place finish in Valencia was followed by eleventh at
2262-663: The Swiss Formula Ford series where he won the title. He moved up into Formula Masters Austria and started 1 race before stepping into Formula BMW ADAC in 2003. Sutil then raced in the Formula 3 Euroseries where he was the runner-up to Lewis Hamilton in 2005. He went to Japan in 2006 to race in the All-Japan Formula Three Championship and also finished 3rd in the Macau Grand Prix . Having been involved in
2340-701: The Turkish Grand Prix , a B-spec car was expected for the Spyker team, but it failed a rear crash test and Sutil continued to use the older spec car. After fuel pressure problems, he was forced to start the race from the pits and finished five laps behind. At Monza , despite the introduction of the B-spec Spyker F8-VII and due to the nature of the circuit, the Spykers were largely uncompetitive once again and Sutil finished 19th, again only in front of his team-mate. At
2418-455: The 2007 Formula One Championship. Despite driving the most uncompetitive car of the year, the German rookie impressed by not only dominating all of his teammates in both qualifying and race conditions, but also by challenging other drivers with superior equipment. Sutil continued with the team in 2008 under its new identity as Force India , after briefly entertaining the possibility of a drive with McLaren or Williams . The first two races of
Sutil - Misplaced Pages Continue
2496-560: The 2009 season. Sutil and the Force India team started the year with a real optimism of points scoring finishes when the European part of the season started after the first four races. BBC commentator Martin Brundle expressed his personal view that: "Adrian Sutil will need to be a lot more consistent in 2009 if he is going to establish himself as a bona fide F1 driver. [However,] Sutil can put
2574-516: The Toro Rosso and finished 9th. After the race it was found that Liuzzi had overtaken Sutil under yellow flags, and the 25-second penalty for the Italian promoted Sutil to the final points position. Toro Rosso appealed the decision, but the penalty was upheld. Spyker were not competitive in the final two races of the year, neither of which Sutil finished. He has been praised by many for his performances in
2652-407: The accused has directly and violently "inflicted" it by assaulting the victim, or where the accused has "inflicted" it by doing something, intentionally, which, although it is not itself a direct application of force to the body of the victim, does directly result in force being applied violently to the body of the victim, so that he suffers grievous bodily harm. In R v Clarence , it appeared that at
2730-508: The agreement of the majority of the House of Lords, "In my opinion ... the word 'cause' is wider or at least not narrower than the word 'inflict ' ". In R v Burstow, R v Ireland , it was held that an offence of inflicting grievous bodily harm under section 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 can be committed where no physical violence is applied directly or indirectly to the body of
2808-482: The car. Sutil's Senna – one of 35 Senna LM made – was heavily damaged; with its front bumper, front panels and bonnet detached from its chassis, with the windscreen shattered. Sutil emerged from the wreckage unscathed. Rather than being scrapped, Sutil's Senna LM was rebuilt. The process took over 2 years, with the rebuild process finishing in late December 2022. Sutil started karting at 14 before moving up to Swiss Formula Ford 1800 in 2002. He won all ten rounds of
2886-402: The charge "malicious wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm". The Crown Prosecution Service says that the following factors may be evidence of intention: Sections 20 and 47 are offences of basic intent and can be an alternative charge to section 18, and/or section 47 is a lesser included offence . Consent is only an allowed defence to either section if there is considered to be
2964-664: The closing stages of the race. Another eleventh place followed in Korea , before a ninth-place finish in the inaugural race in India . At the final race in Brazil , Sutil matched his best finish of the season with sixth place, and as a result, moved into ninth place in the final championship standings. As a result of his assault convictions (see above ), Sutil was released at the end of the 2011 season and replaced with Nico Hülkenberg . On 28 February 2013, Force India announced that Sutil would return to
3042-444: The disease had not been inflicted within the meaning of the word "inflict" in section 20. Mathew J said that he agreed with Stephen. Stephen said that he had been informed that Grantham J agreed with him. Huddleston B said that he thoroughly agreed with Stephen. Lord Coleridge CJ said that he agreed with all or almost all of what Wills and Stephen said. Hawkins J specifically said that he thought it had been inflicted within
3120-523: The end of the year, he was promoted to second driver for the 2007 season, having been signed on a multi-year contract by the Spyker MF1 Team . In an interview with the Official Formula One website, Sutil's first 2007 teammate, Christijan Albers , commented that "Adrian is a good driver and he will be quick this year, but as a driver you should always be pushing to the limits without thinking what
3198-548: The fastest lap of the race, his first in Formula One and the first fastest lap recorded for Force India. This finish would be the best of his F1 career. In Singapore , Sutil was forced to retire after he collided with Nick Heidfeld of BMW Sauber , moving into his path as he recovered from a spin. After the race, Sutil was reprimanded by race stewards and fined $ 20,000 for causing an avoidable accident. In Japan , Sutil took his second best career qualifying result of fourth, but
Sutil - Misplaced Pages Continue
3276-605: The future. He moved to the ASM team at the final round of the year. Sutil stayed with ASM for 2005 and was joined by British driver Lewis Hamilton . Hamilton won more races than Sutil, but the German was runner-up to Hamilton and the Briton's only serious competitor in the championship and at the Marlboro Masters of Formula Three at Zandvoort . Sutil missed the last two rounds of the 2005 Euroseries after joining A1 Team Germany for
3354-411: The gravity described in the section, i.e. a wound or serious physical injury. It is enough that he should have foreseen that some physical harm to some person, albeit of a minor character, might result. Therefore, the defendant must at least be reckless as to whether some harm, albeit not necessarily serious harm, is likely to be caused (see R v Savage, DPP v Parmenter ), but a mere intention to frighten
3432-492: The grid after an accident in qualifying – at the Belgian Grand Prix . He retired at Monza after his car suffered a hydraulics problem, before an eighth-place finish in Singapore , holding off a late-race challenge from Felipe Massa . In Japan , Sutil ran inside the top ten placings for much of the race, but finished the race just outside the points in eleventh place, having been passed by Vitaly Petrov and Nico Rosberg in
3510-539: The guy in the car next to you is doing. But Adrian will be a good team-mate and it looks as though he's going to be a big talent [for the future]". During 2007, Sutil out-qualified and out-raced his team-mate Albers at all Grands Prix before the Dutchman was replaced by Sutil's countryman Markus Winkelhock, test driver for the team up until that time at the European Grand Prix . Sutil out-qualified Winkelhock, although
3588-690: The inaugural A1 Grand Prix series. He raced for them at three events in Portugal, Australia and Dubai, his best result being two twelfth places. He spent 2006 racing in Japan and won the All-Japan Formula Three Championship . He showed a very strong performance all season. He also finished third in the Macau Formula Three Grand Prix and made a one-off appearance in Japanese Super GT . That year also saw Sutil enter Formula One. In January, he
3666-406: The incident, charged with assault occasioning grievous bodily harm . Sutil was convicted of the charge on 31 January 2012, and received an 18-month suspended prison sentence , along with a € 200,000 fine that was to be donated to charities "of the court's choosing." Sutil initially had planned on appealing his conviction but eventually decided not to. Lewis Hamilton , among Sutil's friends at
3744-552: The latter went on to lead the race and restart after a sudden downpour. Winkelhock resumed his third driver role for the following grand prix at Hungary when Japanese driver Sakon Yamamoto took over the second team seat. Sutil out-performed Yamamoto in the race, passing Honda drivers Rubens Barrichello and Jenson Button . In the Hungarian Grand Prix , Sutil was the first Spyker driver in 2007 to beat another running classified finisher, Honda's Rubens Barrichello. For
3822-400: The lawful apprehension or detainer of any person, shall be guilty of felony, and being convicted thereof shall be liable ... to be kept in penal servitude for life ... The words omitted in the first to third places specifically included shooting or attempting to shoot, and included some words considered redundant; they were repealed by section 10(2) of, and Part III of Schedule 3 to,
3900-557: The main celebrations in the Force India pit were for teammate Giancarlo Fisichella 's excellent pole position. Sutil finished 11th, while Fisichella finished less than a second behind Kimi Räikkönen's race-winning Ferrari. At the Italian Grand Prix , Sutil took his career best qualifying result of second place and finished fourth in the race behind Räikkönen, despite accidentally overshooting his mechanics during his final pit stop, but they suffered only minor injuries. He also recorded
3978-400: The meaning of the word "inflict" in section 20. Wills J said (footnotes have been included in the body of the text, indicated by "(1)"): But I think the section clearly points to the infliction of direct and intentional violence, whether with a weapon, or the fist, or the foot, or any other part of the person or in any other way not involving the use of the weapon, as for instance by creating
SECTION 50
#17328454995044056-412: The offence under section 20 is variously referred to as "unlawful wounding", "malicious wounding" or "inflicting grievous bodily harm". This section now reads: Whosoever shall unlawfully and maliciously by any means whatsoever wound or cause any grievous bodily harm to any person, ... with intent, ... to do some ... grievous bodily harm to any person, or with intent to resist or prevent
4134-447: The pavement and injured him. The appellant denied that he was the driver of the car in a written statement to the police and said he could add nothing to that statement in an unsworn statement from the dock. However, during his closing speech, counsel for the defence suggested that all the appellant intended to do was frighten the victim and no more. The jury were directed that if there was an intention to frighten, and injury took place as
4212-510: The points in Turkey with a 9th place. He followed this result with points scoring finishes in the next three rounds in Canada , Europe and Britain . Sutil remained with Force India for 2011 , and was joined by DTM champion Paul di Resta . In the first three races of the season, Sutil was out-qualified by di Resta. Sutil finished ninth in the Australian Grand Prix , at the expense of
4290-562: The previous incident at the 2008 Monaco Grand Prix . In Hungary , he was forced to retire after just two laps because a water temperature problem caused the engine to overheat, after qualifying 17th. In Valencia , new aerodynamic upgrades for the VJM02 saw him qualify 12th, and he then raced steadily to finish 10th, demonstrating that the team were at last showing signs of competitiveness, as teammate Fisichella finished 12th behind Heidfeld's BMW Sauber . In Belgium , he qualified 11th, although
4368-544: The race, a poor pit strategy resulted in Sutil finishing the race at the back of the field, scrapping with Fisichella (who had joined Ferrari) and Renault's Romain Grosjean . The German eventually finished 17th, 1 lap down but ahead of the Frenchman. Sutil was in talks with Force India to renew his contract, and on 27 November 2009, the team announced that the German's contract had been renewed, while test-driver Vitantonio Liuzzi
4446-471: The rear diffuser, and he was forced to retire. Mike Gascoyne called for Räikkönen to be punished over the incident. No punishment, however, was given. However, Sutil had overtaken three cars under yellow flags and according to steward Paul Gutjahr, should he have reached the chequered flag, he would have been given a 25-second penalty which would have dropped him out of the point-scoring positions. On 17 October Force India announced they would keep Sutil for
4524-519: The rupturing of blood vessels is an internal wound; only the breaking of whole skin would warrant a wounding charge. A bruise or internal rupturing of blood vessels is not a wound, and neither is a broken bone. Wounding does not imply the use of a weapon; a kick may be wounding. Grievous bodily harm means "really serious bodily harm": DPP v Smith [1961] AC 290, HL; R v Cunningham [1982] AC 566, HL; R v Brown (A) [1994] 1 AC 212, HL; R v Brown and Stratton [1998] Crim LR 485, CA. It encompasses
4602-540: The same for Northern Ireland, until the 1861 Act was amended in 2004 to update the formulation. Penal servitude was abolished by the Criminal Justice Act 1948 and the Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1953 . Accordingly, the phrase "penal servitude" is to be read as "imprisonment". None of the words used in these sections are defined elsewhere in the Act, but they have been defined by case law. For this purpose,
4680-407: The same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Sutil . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sutil&oldid=1192189322 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description
4758-519: The season ended with mechanical failures While running in a very strong fourth position in Monaco with six laps remaining, he was hit in the rear by fifth placed Kimi Räikkönen who lost control of his car while braking for the harbour chicane. A crash a few laps earlier had resulted in the safety car being deployed, with Sutil losing his considerable lead over the Finnish driver. Sutil's car suffered damage to
SECTION 60
#17328454995044836-622: The season from pole and added five wins in the Formula Masters Austria championship. When Sutil moved up to the Formula BMW ADAC championship in 2003 he finished in sixth place in the series, but with no wins. The following season he stepped up to the Formula 3 Euroseries with Colin Kolles ' team. Although he scored only twice, the connection he made with Kolles would prove useful in
4914-481: The stewards took no action against Sutil for the accident, while Trulli was fined $ 10,000 for his unacceptable behaviour. The matter was not resolved however, as Sutil and Trulli still argued about the accident two weeks later at the driver's press conference for the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix . In Abu Dhabi, Sutil was unusually off the pace, qualifying only 18th on the grid. Although he overtook several cars during
4992-430: The street where she lived. He was frequently, and unnecessarily, at her home and place of work. He surreptitiously took photographs of the victim and her family. He sent her a note which was intended to be menacing, and was so understood." Neither offence requires that a common assault be committed. In R v Wilson, R v Jenkins , Lord Roskill said: In our opinion, grievous bodily harm may be inflicted ... either where
5070-481: The team to complete their driver lineup alongside Paul di Resta . He finished seventh at the season-opening Australian Grand Prix , impressing on his comeback by leading for a number of laps throughout the race. In Malaysia , he retired from the race following problems with a new captive wheel nut system that the team had introduced at the beginning of the season. Grievous bodily harm Assault occasioning grievous bodily harm (often abbreviated to GBH )
5148-405: The time, was also present in the nightclub that night. He was named as a defence witness by Sutil's side, but Hamilton did not appear in court because the trial coincided with the launch of his team's car. He stated he could attend a retrial, should one take place, as he would not be occupied on the scheduled day, but as a result, the friendship of the two drivers ended, with Sutil branding Hamilton
5226-548: The track only to hit the Toyota of Jarno Trulli . The Italian had also run wide and was rejoining the track. This forced both drivers to retire and caused the two Toro Rossos of Sébastien Bourdais and Sébastien Buemi to crash into each other. In Monaco , Sutil finished 14th and finished 17th in Turkey , after qualifying a career-best of 15th. In qualifying in Britain , Sutil went off at Abbey corner after brake failure in Q1. Qualifying
5304-429: The unpredictable conditions in qualifying, and secured his best-ever qualifying position of seventh. In the race, he was lying in second place for a while before his first pit stop. However, a collision with Kimi Räikkönen after coming out of the pit lane meant he had to pit again to replace his front wing. He finished 15th. It was the second time that a collision with Räikkönen cost Sutil the chance to score points, after
5382-566: The victim. Lord Hope of Craighead said "the word 'inflict' implies that the consequence of the act is something which the victim is likely to find unpleasant or harmful." He said that, in the context of a criminal act, the words "cause" and "inflict" may be taken to be interchangeable. Lord Steyn described the actions of Burstow as follows: "During an eight-month period in 1995 covered by the indictment he continued his campaign of harassment. He made some silent telephone calls to her. He also made abusive calls to her. He distributed offensive cards in
5460-464: The words imply an assault and battery of which a wound or grievous bodily harm is the manifest immediate and obvious result. A. L. Smith J said "it appears to me that this offence cannot be committed unless an assault has in fact been committed, and indeed this has been so held". Hawkins J said that he thought that the contention that bodily harm cannot be legally said to be "inflicted" unless it has been brought about by some act amounting to an assault
5538-465: Was confirmed as one of the three test drivers for the new Midland F1 Racing team, along with Markus Winkelhock and Giorgio Mondini . This came thanks to his connections with Colin Kolles, who was then running the team. Sutil appeared for the team as the third driver at the European , French and Japanese Grands Prix . By the time of his third appearance, the outfit had been bought by Spyker Cars . At
5616-458: Was given a 5 grid place penalty along with Jenson Button, Rubens Barrichello and Fernando Alonso for not slowing down while yellow flags were waved (due to a crash by Sebastien Buemi, who was also demoted five places for attempting to drive his badly damaged Toro Rosso back to the pits) and started the race from eighth on the grid. Sutil finished 13th. In the wet qualifying session in Brazil , Sutil qualified third, but retired on lap one following
5694-695: Was given a full-time race seat. Sutil qualified tenth for the first two races of the year, but a collision with Robert Kubica in Bahrain and a mechanical failure in Australia meant he was unable to score points in either race. However, Sutil commented that the performances proved that the team could now score points in dry races. This comment was backed up by Sutil's fifth-place finish in the following race in Malaysia . In China he finished 11th. In Spain he finished 7th and in Monaco he finished 8th. Sutil again finished in
5772-399: Was highly praised for his efforts by both team and media. Two weeks later in the rain at Fuji Speedway , Japan, it seemed Sutil had narrowly missed an opportunity to score Spyker's first ever point, briefly holding 8th position on the penultimate lap of the high-attrition race after Nick Heidfeld retired his BMW , but was almost immediately passed by fellow backmarker Vitantonio Liuzzi in
5850-434: Was not possible that something less than really serious harm was intended). In R v Martin , shortly before the conclusion of a performance at a theatre, the defendant put out the lights on a staircase which a large number of persons had to descend in order to leave the theatre, and he also obstructed the exit by placing an iron bar across a doorway which they had in leaving to pass, and upon the lights being thus extinguished,
5928-432: Was red flagged and as a result no one else could post a lap time. This meant that Sutil was to start from 18th on the grid, although the team had hoped that both Sutil and Giancarlo Fisichella would get into Q2. Due to the damage caused by the accident he had to start from the pit lane because he needed to use a new car and a new engine, and went on to finish 17th in an uneventful race. In Germany , Sutil took advantage of
6006-424: Was running in 6th place with 6 laps remaining when he lost control of his Force India – due to aquaplaning – resulting in him crashing and forcing him to retire. In Bahrain , Sutil was penalised for blocking Mark Webber during the first qualifying session. He personally walked into Mark's room to apologise for the incident. In Spain , after running wide at the first corner of the first lap Sutil rejoined
6084-440: Was untenable. In R v Mowatt , Lord Diplock said: In the offence under section 20 ... the word "maliciously" does import upon the part of the person who unlawfully inflicts the wound or other grievous bodily harm an awareness that his act may have the consequence of causing some physical harm to some other person ... It is quite unnecessary that the accused should have foreseen that his unlawful act might cause physical harm of
#503496