Misplaced Pages

#236763

78-460: The Elsinore Fault Zone, not including Whittier, Chino, and Laguna Salada faults, is 180 kilometers (110 mi) long with a slip-rate of 4.0 millimeters/year (0.15 in/yr). It is estimated that this zone is capable of producing a quake of 6.5–7.5 M W . The projected interval between major rupture events is 250 years. The last major rupture event on the main Elsinore fault was in 1910 with

156-607: A 6 M W earthquake centered just northwest of the city of Lake Elsinore. The fault runs from the mountainous Peninsular Ranges region between El Centro and San Diego , northwest to the Chino Hills range and Chino Hills . On the southern end of the fault zone is the southeastern extension of the Elsinore fault zone, the Laguna Salada Fault . At its northern end, the Elsinore Fault Zone splits into two segments,

234-444: A common clock ) recording P-wave arrivals permits the computation of a unique time and location on the planet for the event. Typically, dozens or even hundreds of P-wave arrivals are used to calculate hypocenters . The misfit generated by a hypocenter calculation is known as "the residual". Residuals of 0.5 second or less are typical for distant events, residuals of 0.1–0.2 s typical for local events, meaning most reported P arrivals fit

312-496: A constant term ( W 0 / M o  = 5 × 10 ) in Eq. (A) and estimated M s and denoted as M w (dyn.cm). The energy Eq. (A) is derived by substituting m  = 2.5 + 0.63 M in the energy equation Log E  = 5.8 + 2.4 m (Richter 1958), where m is the Gutenberg unified magnitude and M is a least squares approximation to the magnitude determined from surface wave magnitudes. After replacing

390-485: A double couple, but not from a single couple. This was confirmed as better and more plentiful data coming from the World-Wide Standard Seismograph Network (WWSSN) permitted closer analysis of seismic waves. Notably, in 1966 Keiiti Aki showed that the seismic moment of the 1964 Niigata earthquake as calculated from the seismic waves on the basis of a double couple was in reasonable agreement with

468-727: A fluid-filled borehole , being an important source of coherent noise in vertical seismic profiles (VSP) and making up the low frequency component of the source in sonic logging . The equation for Stoneley waves was first given by Dr. Robert Stoneley (1894–1976), emeritus professor of seismology, Cambridge. Free oscillations of the Earth are standing waves , the result of interference between two surface waves traveling in opposite directions. Interference of Rayleigh waves results in spheroidal oscillation S while interference of Love waves gives toroidal oscillation T . The modes of oscillations are specified by three numbers, e.g., n S l , where l

546-418: A general solution in 1964 by Burridge and Knopoff, which established the relationship between double couples and the theory of elastic rebound, and provided the basis for relating an earthquake's physical features to seismic moment. Seismic moment – symbol M 0   – is a measure of the fault slip and area involved in the earthquake. Its value is the torque of each of the two force couples that form

624-526: A layered medium (e.g., the crust and upper mantle ) the velocity of the Rayleigh waves depends on their frequency and wavelength. See also Lamb waves . Love waves are horizontally polarized shear waves (SH waves), existing only in the presence of a layered medium. They are named after Augustus Edward Hough Love , a British mathematician who created a mathematical model of the waves in 1911. They usually travel slightly faster than Rayleigh waves, about 90% of

702-408: A longer route can take a shorter time. The travel time must be calculated very accurately in order to compute a precise hypocenter. Since P waves move at many kilometers per second, being off on travel-time calculation by even a half second can mean an error of many kilometers in terms of distance. In practice, P arrivals from many stations are used and the errors cancel out, so the computed epicenter

780-402: A portion Δ W {\displaystyle \Delta W} of this stored energy is transformed into The potential energy drop caused by an earthquake is related approximately to its seismic moment by where σ ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {\sigma }}} is the average of the absolute shear stresses on the fault before and after

858-435: A seismic observatory, their different travel times help scientists locate the quake's hypocenter . In geophysics, the refraction or reflection of seismic waves is used for research into Earth's internal structure . Scientists sometimes generate and measure vibrations to investigate shallow, subsurface structure. Among the many types of seismic waves, one can make a broad distinction between body waves , which travel through

SECTION 10

#1732852785237

936-449: A single couple model. In principle these models could be distinguished by differences in the radiation patterns of their S-waves , but the quality of the observational data was inadequate for that. The debate ended when Maruyama (1963), Haskell (1964), and Burridge and Knopoff (1964) showed that if earthquake ruptures are modeled as dislocations the pattern of seismic radiation can always be matched with an equivalent pattern derived from

1014-439: A three-decade-long controversy over the best way to model the seismic source: as a single couple, or a double couple. While Japanese seismologists favored the double couple, most seismologists favored the single couple. Although the single couple model had some shortcomings, it seemed more intuitive, and there was a belief – mistaken, as it turned out – that the elastic rebound theory for explaining why earthquakes happen required

1092-400: Is a measure of the work (more precisely, the torque ) that results in inelastic (permanent) displacement or distortion of the Earth's crust. It is related to the total energy released by an earthquake. However, the power or potential destructiveness of an earthquake depends (among other factors) on how much of the total energy is converted into seismic waves. This is typically 10% or less of

1170-469: Is also known as the Richter scale , but news media sometimes use that term indiscriminately to refer to other similar scales.) The local magnitude scale was developed on the basis of shallow (~15 km (9 mi) deep), moderate-sized earthquakes at a distance of approximately 100 to 600 km (62 to 373 mi), conditions where the surface waves are predominant. At greater depths, distances, or magnitudes

1248-429: Is approximately related to seismic moment by where η R = E s / ( E s + E f ) {\displaystyle \eta _{R}=E_{s}/(E_{s}+E_{f})} is radiated efficiency and Δ σ s {\displaystyle \Delta \sigma _{s}} is the static stress drop, i.e., the difference between shear stresses on

1326-485: Is challenging as the source events cannot be observed directly, and it took many years to develop the mathematics for understanding what the seismic waves from an earthquake can tell about the source event. An early step was to determine how different systems of forces might generate seismic waves equivalent to those observed from earthquakes. The simplest force system is a single force acting on an object. If it has sufficient strength to overcome any resistance it will cause

1404-501: Is complete and ignores fracture energy), (where E is in Joules and M 0   is in N ⋅ {\displaystyle \cdot } m), Kanamori approximated M w   by The formula above made it much easier to estimate the energy-based magnitude M w  , but it changed the fundamental nature of the scale into a moment magnitude scale. USGS seismologist Thomas C. Hanks noted that Kanamori's M w   scale

1482-453: Is considered the authoritative magnitude scale for ranking earthquakes by size. It is more directly related to the energy of an earthquake than other scales, and does not saturate – that is, it does not underestimate magnitudes as other scales do in certain conditions. It has become the standard scale used by seismological authorities like the U.S. Geological Survey for reporting large earthquakes (typically M > 4), replacing

1560-426: Is only valid for (≤ 7.0). Seismic moment is not a direct measure of energy changes during an earthquake. The relations between seismic moment and the energies involved in an earthquake depend on parameters that have large uncertainties and that may vary between earthquakes. Potential energy is stored in the crust in the form of elastic energy due to built-up stress and gravitational energy . During an earthquake,

1638-457: Is persistent low-amplitude vibration arising from a variety of natural and anthropogenic sources. The propagation velocity of a seismic wave depends on density and elasticity of the medium as well as the type of wave. Velocity tends to increase with depth through Earth's crust and mantle , but drops sharply going from the mantle to Earth's outer core . Earthquakes create distinct types of waves with different velocities. When recorded by

SECTION 20

#1732852785237

1716-463: Is technically difficult since it involves the integration of wave energy over the entire frequency band. To simplify this calculation, he noted that the lowest frequency parts of the spectrum can often be used to estimate the rest of the spectrum. The lowest frequency asymptote of a seismic spectrum is characterized by the seismic moment , M 0  . Using an approximate relation between radiated energy and seismic moment (which assumes stress drop

1794-433: Is the angular order number (or spherical harmonic degree , see Spherical harmonics for more details). The number m is the azimuthal order number. It may take on 2 l +1 values from − l to + l . The number n is the radial order number . It means the wave with n zero crossings in radius. For spherically symmetric Earth the period for given n and l does not depend on m . Some examples of spheroidal oscillations are

1872-620: Is the same for all earthquakes, one can consider M w   as a measure of the energy E s radiated by earthquakes. Under these assumptions, the following formula, obtained by solving for M 0   the equation defining M w  , allows one to assess the ratio E 1 / E 2 {\displaystyle E_{1}/E_{2}} of energy release (potential or radiated) between two earthquakes of different moment magnitudes, m 1 {\displaystyle m_{1}} and m 2 {\displaystyle m_{2}} : As with

1950-420: Is thus poorly known. It could vary highly from one earthquake to another. Two earthquakes with identical M 0 {\displaystyle M_{0}} but different σ ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {\sigma }}} would have released different Δ W {\displaystyle \Delta W} . The radiated energy caused by an earthquake

2028-407: Is to take the difference in arrival time of the P wave and the S wave in seconds and multiply by 8 kilometers per second. Modern seismic arrays use more complicated earthquake location techniques. At teleseismic distances, the first arriving P waves have necessarily travelled deep into the mantle, and perhaps have even refracted into the outer core of the planet, before travelling back up to

2106-409: The "breathing" mode 0 S 0 , which involves an expansion and contraction of the whole Earth, and has a period of about 20 minutes; and the "rugby" mode 0 S 2 , which involves expansions along two alternating directions, and has a period of about 54 minutes. The mode 0 S 1 does not exist because it would require a change in the center of gravity, which would require an external force. Of

2184-867: The Chino Fault and the Whittier Fault . In the Elsinore Trough , the Elsinore Fault Zone creates four graben rift valleys between the Santa Ana Mountain Block and the Perris Block : the Temescal Valley , Elsinore Valley with its large sag pond of Lake Elsinore and the Temecula Valley and Wolf Valley . In the Elsinore Trough the fault zone is split into pairs of parallel strands with

2262-503: The Earth or another planetary body . It can result from an earthquake (or generally, a quake ), volcanic eruption , magma movement, a large landslide and a large man-made explosion that produces low-frequency acoustic energy. Seismic waves are studied by seismologists , who record the waves using seismometers , hydrophones (in water), or accelerometers . Seismic waves are distinguished from seismic noise (ambient vibration), which

2340-689: The Glen Ivy North Fault and Lee Lake Fault forming the first valley, the Glen Ivy South Fault and Willard Faults the second and the Willard and Wildomar Faults the last two valleys to the southeast. A multi-year study published in 2018 suggests a connection between the Elsinore fault and other fault lines farther south, in Mexico: "...observations of the Yuha Desert and Salton Trough suggest that

2418-435: The logarithm of the amplitude of the seismograph trace could be used as a measure of "magnitude" that was internally consistent and corresponded roughly with estimates of an earthquake's energy. He established a reference point and the ten-fold (exponential) scaling of each degree of magnitude, and in 1935 published what he called the "magnitude scale", now called the local magnitude scale , labeled M L  . (This scale

Elsinore Fault Zone - Misplaced Pages Continue

2496-494: The refraction of light waves . Two types of particle motion result in two types of body waves: Primary and Secondary waves. This distinction was recognized in 1830 by the French mathematician Siméon Denis Poisson . Primary waves (P-waves) are compressional waves that are longitudinal in nature. P-waves are pressure waves that travel faster than other waves through the earth to arrive at seismograph stations first, hence

2574-621: The 1970s, introducing a separate magnitude associated to radiated energy was warranted. Choy and Boatwright defined in 1995 the energy magnitude where E s {\displaystyle E_{\mathrm {s} }} is in J (N·m). Assuming the values of σ̄/μ are the same for all earthquakes, one can consider M w   as a measure of the potential energy change Δ W caused by earthquakes. Similarly, if one assumes η R Δ σ s / 2 μ {\displaystyle \eta _{R}\Delta \sigma _{s}/2\mu }

2652-647: The 2010 M7.2 El Mayor ‐ Cucapah earthquake rupture, the Laguna Salada fault in Baja California, Mexico, and the Elsinore fault in California are part of the same fault system." Moment magnitude scale The moment magnitude scale ( MMS ; denoted explicitly with M or M w   or Mwg , and generally implied with use of a single M for magnitude ) is a measure of an earthquake 's magnitude ("size" or strength) based on its seismic moment . M w  

2730-431: The Earth's surface where the seismographic stations are located. The waves travel more quickly than if they had traveled in a straight line from the earthquake. This is due to the appreciably increased velocities within the planet, and is termed Huygens' Principle . Density in the planet increases with depth, which would slow the waves, but the modulus of the rock increases much more, so deeper means faster. Therefore,

2808-542: The Earth, and surface waves , which travel at the Earth's surface. Other modes of wave propagation exist than those described in this article; though of comparatively minor importance for earth-borne waves, they are important in the case of asteroseismology . Body waves travel through the interior of the Earth along paths controlled by the material properties in terms of density and modulus (stiffness). The density and modulus, in turn, vary according to temperature, composition, and material phase. This effect resembles

2886-461: The Earth. In general, an upper case denotes a transmitted wave and a lower case denotes a reflected wave. The two exceptions to this seem to be "g" and "n". For example: In the case of local or nearby earthquakes, the difference in the arrival times of the P and S waves can be used to determine the distance to the event. In the case of earthquakes that have occurred at global distances, three or more geographically diverse observing stations (using

2964-452: The Richter scale, an increase of one step on the logarithmic scale of moment magnitude corresponds to a 10 ≈ 32 times increase in the amount of energy released, and an increase of two steps corresponds to a 10 = 1000 times increase in energy. Thus, an earthquake of M w   of 7.0 contains 1000 times as much energy as one of 5.0 and about 32 times that of 6.0. To make the significance of

3042-408: The S wave velocity. A Stoneley wave is a type of boundary wave (or interface wave) that propagates along a solid-fluid boundary or, under specific conditions, also along a solid-solid boundary. Amplitudes of Stoneley waves have their maximum values at the boundary between the two contacting media and decay exponentially towards away from the contact. These waves can also be generated along the walls of

3120-557: The absence of S-waves in earth's outer core suggests a liquid state. Seismic surface waves travel along the Earth's surface. They can be classified as a form of mechanical surface wave . Surface waves diminish in amplitude as they get farther from the surface and propagate more slowly than seismic body waves (P and S). Surface waves from very large earthquakes can have globally observable amplitude of several centimeters. Rayleigh waves, also called ground roll, are surface waves that propagate with motions that are similar to those of waves on

3198-403: The computed hypocenter that well. Typically a location program will start by assuming the event occurred at a depth of about 33 km; then it minimizes the residual by adjusting depth. Most events occur at depths shallower than about 40 km, but some occur as deep as 700 km. A quick way to determine the distance from a location to the origin of a seismic wave less than 200 km away

Elsinore Fault Zone - Misplaced Pages Continue

3276-438: The corresponding explosion energy, a value of 4.2 x 10 joules per ton of TNT applies. The table illustrates the relationship between seismic energy and moment magnitude. The end of the scale is at the value 10.6, corresponding to the assumption that at this value the Earth's crust would have to break apart completely. Seismic wave A seismic wave is a mechanical wave of acoustic energy that travels through

3354-481: The different areas of application, a wide variety of nomenclatures have emerged historically, the standardization of which – for example in the IASPEI Standard Seismic Phase List – is still an ongoing process. The path that a wave takes between the focus and the observation point is often drawn as a ray diagram. Each path is denoted by a set of letters that describe the trajectory and phase through

3432-428: The earthquake (e.g., equation 3 of Venkataraman & Kanamori 2004 ) and μ {\displaystyle \mu } is the average of the shear moduli of the rocks that constitute the fault. Currently, there is no technology to measure absolute stresses at all depths of interest, nor method to estimate it accurately, and σ ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {\sigma }}}

3510-483: The earthquake rupture process; the first magnitude scales were therefore empirical . The initial step in determining earthquake magnitudes empirically came in 1931 when the Japanese seismologist Kiyoo Wadati showed that the maximum amplitude of an earthquake's seismic waves diminished with distance at a certain rate. Charles F. Richter then worked out how to adjust for epicentral distance (and some other factors) so that

3588-399: The earthquake's equivalent double-couple. (More precisely, it is the scalar magnitude of the second-order moment tensor that describes the force components of the double-couple. ) Seismic moment is measured in units of Newton meters (N·m) or Joules , or (in the older CGS system) dyne-centimeters (dyn-cm). The first calculation of an earthquake's seismic moment from its seismic waves

3666-409: The energy released, and the stress drop (essentially how much of the potential energy was released). In particular, he derived an equation that relates an earthquake's seismic moment to its physical parameters: with μ being the rigidity (or resistance to moving) of a fault with a surface area of S over an average dislocation (distance) of ū . (Modern formulations replace ūS with

3744-482: The equivalent D̄A , known as the "geometric moment" or "potency". ) By this equation the moment determined from the double couple of the seismic waves can be related to the moment calculated from knowledge of the surface area of fault slippage and the amount of slip. In the case of the Niigata earthquake the dislocation estimated from the seismic moment reasonably approximated the observed dislocation. Seismic moment

3822-456: The fact that they only provided a comparison of the amplitude of waves produced at a standard distance and frequency band; it was difficult to relate these magnitudes to a physical property of the earthquake. Gutenberg and Richter suggested that radiated energy E s could be estimated as (in Joules). Unfortunately, the duration of many very large earthquakes was longer than 20 seconds, the period of

3900-587: The faster-moving P-waves and displace the ground perpendicular to the direction of propagation. Depending on the propagational direction, the wave can take on different surface characteristics; for example, in the case of horizontally polarized S waves, the ground moves alternately to one side and then the other. S-waves can travel only through solids, as fluids (liquids and gases) do not support shear stresses . S-waves are slower than P-waves, and speeds are typically around 60% of that of P-waves in any given material. Shear waves can not travel through any liquid medium, so

3978-1161: The fault before and after the earthquake (e.g., from equation 1 of Venkataraman & Kanamori 2004 ). These two quantities are far from being constants. For instance, η R {\displaystyle \eta _{R}} depends on rupture speed; it is close to 1 for regular earthquakes but much smaller for slower earthquakes such as tsunami earthquakes and slow earthquakes . Two earthquakes with identical M 0 {\displaystyle M_{0}} but different η R {\displaystyle \eta _{R}} or Δ σ s {\displaystyle \Delta \sigma _{s}} would have radiated different E s {\displaystyle E_{\mathrm {s} }} . Because E s {\displaystyle E_{\mathrm {s} }} and M 0 {\displaystyle M_{0}} are fundamentally independent properties of an earthquake source, and since E s {\displaystyle E_{\mathrm {s} }} can now be computed more directly and robustly than in

SECTION 50

#1732852785237

4056-475: The fundamental toroidal modes, 0 T 1 represents changes in Earth's rotation rate; although this occurs, it is much too slow to be useful in seismology. The mode 0 T 2 describes a twisting of the northern and southern hemispheres relative to each other; it has a period of about 44 minutes. The first observations of free oscillations of the Earth were done during the great 1960 earthquake in Chile . Presently

4134-447: The interactions of forces) this model is called a couple , also simple couple or single couple . If a second couple of equal and opposite magnitude is applied their torques cancel; this is called a double couple . A double couple can be viewed as "equivalent to a pressure and tension acting simultaneously at right angles". The single couple and double couple models are important in seismology because each can be used to derive how

4212-419: The local magnitude (M L  ) and surface-wave magnitude (M s  ) scales. Subtypes of the moment magnitude scale (M ww  , etc.) reflect different ways of estimating the seismic moment. At the beginning of the twentieth century, very little was known about how earthquakes happen, how seismic waves are generated and propagate through the Earth's crust, and what information they carry about

4290-504: The local magnitude and the surface wave magnitude. Thus, a magnitude zero microearthquake has a seismic moment of approximately 1.1 × 10  N⋅m , while the Great Chilean earthquake of 1960, with an estimated moment magnitude of 9.4–9.6, had a seismic moment between 1.4 × 10  N⋅m and 2.8 × 10  N⋅m . Seismic moment magnitude ( M wg or Das Magnitude Scale ) and moment magnitude ( M w ) scales To understand

4368-416: The magnitude range 5.0 ≤  M s  ≤ 7.5 is not reliable due to the inconsistency of defined magnitude range (moderate to large earthquakes defined as M s  ≤ 7.0 and M s  = 7–7.5) and scarce data in lower magnitude range (≤ 7.0) which rarely represents the global seismicity (e.g., see Figs. 1A, B, 4 and Table 2 of Percaru and Berckhemer 1978). Furthermore, Equation (1) of Percaru and Berckhemer 1978)

4446-710: The magnitude scales based on M o detailed background of M wg and M w scales is given below. M w scale Hiroo Kanamori defined a magnitude scale (Log W 0  = 1.5 M w  + 11.8, where W 0 is the minimum strain energy) for great earthquakes using Gutenberg Richter Eq. (1). Log Es = 1.5 Ms + 11.8                                                                                     (A) Hiroo Kanamori used W 0 in place of E s (dyn.cm) and consider

4524-427: The magnitude value plausible, the seismic energy released during the earthquake is sometimes compared to the effect of the conventional chemical explosive TNT . The seismic energy E S {\displaystyle E_{\mathrm {S} }} results from the above-mentioned formula according to Gutenberg and Richter to or converted into Hiroshima bombs: For comparison of seismic energy (in joules) with

4602-410: The moment magnitude scale is M w  , with the subscript "w" meaning mechanical work accomplished. The moment magnitude M w   is a dimensionless value defined by Hiroo Kanamori as where M 0   is the seismic moment in dyne ⋅cm (10  N⋅m). The constant values in the equation are chosen to achieve consistency with the magnitude values produced by earlier scales, such as

4680-538: The name "Primary". These waves can travel through any type of material, including fluids, and can travel nearly 1.7 times faster than the S-waves . In air, they take the form of sound waves, hence they travel at the speed of sound . Typical speeds are 330 m/s in air, 1450 m/s in water and about 5000 m/s in granite . Secondary waves (S-waves) are shear waves that are transverse in nature. Following an earthquake event, S-waves arrive at seismograph stations after

4758-492: The now well-established observation that the Earth has a liquid outer core , as demonstrated by Richard Dixon Oldham . This kind of observation has also been used to argue, by seismic testing , that the Moon has a solid core, although recent geodetic studies suggest the core is still molten . The naming of seismic waves is usually based on the wave type and its path; due to the theoretically infinite possibilities of travel paths and

SECTION 60

#1732852785237

4836-463: The object to move ("translate"). A pair of forces, acting on the same "line of action" but in opposite directions, will cancel; if they cancel (balance) exactly there will be no net translation, though the object will experience stress, either tension or compression. If the pair of forces are offset, acting along parallel but separate lines of action, the object experiences a rotational force, or torque . In mechanics (the branch of physics concerned with

4914-421: The periods of thousands of modes have been observed. These data are used for constraining large scale structures of the Earth's interior. When an earthquake occurs, seismographs near the epicenter are able to record both P and S waves, but those at a greater distance no longer detect the high frequencies of the first S wave. Since shear waves cannot pass through liquids, this phenomenon was original evidence for

4992-581: The ratio of seismic Energy ( E ) and Seismic Moment ( M o ), i.e., E / M o  = 5 × 10 , into the Gutenberg–Richter energy magnitude Eq. (A), Hanks and Kanamori provided Eq. (B): Log M0 = 1.5 Ms + 16.1                                                                                   (B) Note that Eq. (B)

5070-466: The seismic moment calculated from the observed physical dislocation. A double couple model suffices to explain an earthquake's far-field pattern of seismic radiation, but tells us very little about the nature of an earthquake's source mechanism or its physical features. While slippage along a fault was theorized as the cause of earthquakes (other theories included movement of magma, or sudden changes of volume due to phase changes ), observing this at depth

5148-430: The seismic waves generated by an earthquake event should appear in the "far field" (that is, at distance). Once that relation is understood it can be inverted to use the earthquake's observed seismic waves to determine its other characteristics, including fault geometry and seismic moment. In 1923 Hiroshi Nakano showed that certain aspects of seismic waves could be explained in terms of a double couple model. This led to

5226-571: The seismological parameter it is based on, is not measured routinely for smaller quakes. For example, the United States Geological Survey does not use this scale for earthquakes with a magnitude of less than 3.5, which includes the great majority of quakes. Popular press reports most often deal with significant earthquakes larger than M~ 4. For these events, the preferred magnitude is the moment magnitude M w  , not Richter's local magnitude M L  . The symbol for

5304-459: The surface of water (note, however, that the associated seismic particle motion at shallow depths is typically retrograde, and that the restoring force in Rayleigh and in other seismic waves is elastic, not gravitational as for water waves). The existence of these waves was predicted by John William Strutt, Lord Rayleigh , in 1885. They are slower than body waves, e.g., at roughly 90% of the velocity of S waves for typical homogeneous elastic media. In

5382-455: The surface waves are greatly reduced, and the local magnitude scale underestimates the magnitude, a problem called saturation . Additional scales were developed – a surface-wave magnitude scale ( M s ) by Beno Gutenberg in 1945, a body-wave magnitude scale ( mB ) by Gutenberg and Richter in 1956, and a number of variants – to overcome the deficiencies of the M L   scale, but all are subject to saturation. A particular problem

5460-459: The surface waves used in the measurement of M s  . This meant that giant earthquakes such as the 1960 Chilean earthquake (M 9.5) were only assigned an M s  8.2. Caltech seismologist Hiroo Kanamori recognized this deficiency and took the simple but important step of defining a magnitude based on estimates of radiated energy, M w  , where the "w" stood for work (energy): Kanamori recognized that measurement of radiated energy

5538-445: The total energy, the rest being expended in fracturing rock or overcoming friction (generating heat). Nonetheless, seismic moment is regarded as the fundamental measure of earthquake size, representing more directly than other parameters the physical size of an earthquake. As early as 1975 it was considered "one of the most reliably determined instrumental earthquake source parameters". Most earthquake magnitude scales suffered from

5616-400: Was already derived by Hiroo Kanamori and termed it as M w . Eq. (B) was based on large earthquakes; hence, in order to validate Eq. (B) for intermediate and smaller earthquakes, Hanks and Kanamori (1979) compared this Eq. (B) with Eq. (1) of Percaru and Berckhemer (1978) for the magnitude 5.0 ≤  M s  ≤ 7.5 (Hanks and Kanamori 1979). Note that Eq. (1) of Percaru and Berckhemer (1978) for

5694-447: Was by Keiiti Aki for the 1964 Niigata earthquake . He did this two ways. First, he used data from distant stations of the WWSSN to analyze long-period (200 second) seismic waves (wavelength of about 1,000 kilometers) to determine the magnitude of the earthquake's equivalent double couple. Second, he drew upon the work of Burridge and Knopoff on dislocation to determine the amount of slip,

5772-434: Was defined in a 1979 paper by Thomas C. Hanks and Hiroo Kanamori . Similar to the local magnitude/Richter scale (M L  ) defined by Charles Francis Richter in 1935, it uses a logarithmic scale ; small earthquakes have approximately the same magnitudes on both scales. Despite the difference, news media often use the term "Richter scale" when referring to the moment magnitude scale. Moment magnitude (M w  )

5850-571: Was not possible, and understanding what could be learned about the source mechanism from the seismic waves requires an understanding of the source mechanism. Modeling the physical process by which an earthquake generates seismic waves required much theoretical development of dislocation theory , first formulated by the Italian Vito Volterra in 1907, with further developments by E. H. Love in 1927. More generally applied to problems of stress in materials, an extension by F. Nabarro in 1951

5928-588: Was recognized by the Russian geophysicist A. V. Vvedenskaya as applicable to earthquake faulting. In a series of papers starting in 1956 she and other colleagues used dislocation theory to determine part of an earthquake's focal mechanism, and to show that a dislocation – a rupture accompanied by slipping – was indeed equivalent to a double couple. In a pair of papers in 1958, J. A. Steketee worked out how to relate dislocation theory to geophysical features. Numerous other researchers worked out other details, culminating in

6006-468: Was that the M s   scale (which in the 1970s was the preferred magnitude scale) saturates around M s  8.0 and therefore underestimates the energy release of "great" earthquakes such as the 1960 Chilean and 1964 Alaskan earthquakes. These had M s   magnitudes of 8.5 and 8.4 respectively but were notably more powerful than other M 8 earthquakes; their moment magnitudes were closer to 9.6 and 9.3, respectively. The study of earthquakes

6084-521: Was very similar to a relationship between M L   and M 0   that was reported by Thatcher & Hanks (1973) Hanks & Kanamori (1979) combined their work to define a new magnitude scale based on estimates of seismic moment where M 0 {\displaystyle M_{0}} is defined in newton meters (N·m). Moment magnitude is now the most common measure of earthquake size for medium to large earthquake magnitudes, but in practice, seismic moment (M 0  ),

#236763