Misplaced Pages

#368631

83-633: The Cray SV1 is a vector processor supercomputer from the Cray Research division of Silicon Graphics introduced in 1998. The SV1 has since been succeeded by the Cray X1 and X1E vector supercomputers. Like its predecessor, the Cray J90 , the SV1 used CMOS processors, which lowered the cost of the system, and allowed the computer to be air-cooled. The SV1 was backwards compatible with J90 and Y-MP software, and ran

166-434: A , k {\displaystyle \alpha _{m_{1},\ldots ,m_{a},k}} , and y i ( x i ) {\displaystyle y_{i}(x_{i})} certain functions of arguments x i {\displaystyle x_{i}} . A positional code of a function of several variables is called "hyperpyramidal". Of Figure 2 is depicted for example a positional hyperpyramidal code of

249-478: A "single" arithmetic unit . Source: The positional code of an integer number A {\displaystyle A} is a numeral notation of digits α {\displaystyle \alpha } in a certain positional number system of the form Such code may be called "linear". Unlike it a positional code of one-variable x {\displaystyle x} function F ( x ) {\displaystyle F(x)} has

332-608: A LOAD, ADD, MULTIPLY and STORE sequence. If the SIMD width is 4, then the SIMD processor must LOAD four elements entirely before it can move on to the ADDs, must complete all the ADDs before it can move on to the MULTIPLYs, and likewise must complete all of the MULTIPLYs before it can start the STOREs. This is by definition and by design. Having to perform 4-wide simultaneous 64-bit LOADs and 64-bit STOREs

415-529: A co-processor, it is the main computer with the PC-compatible computer into which it is plugged serving support functions. Modern graphics processing units ( GPUs ) include an array of shader pipelines which may be driven by compute kernels , and can be considered vector processors (using a similar strategy for hiding memory latencies). As shown in Flynn's 1972 paper the key distinguishing factor of SIMT-based GPUs

498-828: A code T K R ′ {\displaystyle TK_{R}'^{}} by ( m k ) {\displaystyle (mk)} -digit of another code T K R ″ {\displaystyle TK_{R}''^{}} consists in ( m k ) {\displaystyle (mk)} -shift of the code T K R ′ {\displaystyle TK_{R}'^{}} , i.e. its shift k columns left and m rows up. Multiplication of codes T K R ′ {\displaystyle TK_{R}'^{}} and T K R ″ {\displaystyle TK_{R}''^{}} consists in subsequent ( m k ) {\displaystyle (mk)} -shifts of

581-558: A corresponding 2X or 4X performance gain. Memory bandwidth was sufficient to support these expanded modes. The STAR-100 was otherwise slower than CDC's own supercomputers like the CDC 7600 , but at data-related tasks they could keep up while being much smaller and less expensive. However the machine also took considerable time decoding the vector instructions and getting ready to run the process, so it required very specific data sets to work on before it actually sped anything up. The vector technique

664-480: A definite integral of two functions derivative— as computing the vector product of two vectors, function shift along the X-axis – as vector rotation about axes, etc. In 1966 Khmelnik had proposed a functions coding method, i.e. the functions representation by a "uniform" (for a function as a whole) positional code. And so the mentioned operations with functions are performed as unique computer operations with such codes on

747-418: A function of three variables. On it the nodes correspond to the digits α m 1 , m 2 , m 3 , k {\displaystyle \alpha _{m1,m2,m3,k}} , and the circles contain the values of indexes m 1 , m 2 , m 3 , k {\displaystyle {m1,m2,m3,k}} of the corresponding digit. A positional hyperpyramidal code

830-463: A greater quantity of numbers in the vector register, it becomes unfeasible for the computer to have a register that large. As a result, the vector processor either gains the ability to perform loops itself, or exposes some sort of vector control (status) register to the programmer, usually known as a vector Length. The self-repeating instructions are found in early vector computers like the STAR-100, where

913-421: A high performance vector processor may have multiple functional units adding those numbers in parallel. The checking of dependencies between those numbers is not required as a vector instruction specifies multiple independent operations. This simplifies the control logic required, and can further improve performance by avoiding stalls. The math operations thus completed far faster overall, the limiting factor being

SECTION 10

#1732855476369

996-482: A pipelined loop over 16 units for a hybrid approach. The Broadcom Videocore IV is also capable of this hybrid approach: nominally stating that its SIMD QPU Engine supports 16-long FP array operations in its instructions, it actually does them 4 at a time, as (another) form of "threads". This example starts with an algorithm ("IAXPY"), first show it in scalar instructions, then SIMD, then predicated SIMD, and finally vector instructions. This incrementally helps illustrate

1079-428: A special instruction, the significance compared to Videocore IV (and, crucially as will be shown below, SIMD as well) being that the repeat length does not have to be part of the instruction encoding. This way, significantly more work can be done in each batch; the instruction encoding is much more elegant and compact as well. The only drawback is that in order to take full advantage of this extra batch processing capacity,

1162-513: A table may be synthesized for R > 2. {\displaystyle R>2.} Below we have written the table of one-digit addition for R = 3 {\displaystyle R=3} : in R-nary triangular codes differs from the one-digit addition only by the fact that in the given ( m k ) {\displaystyle (mk)} -digit the value S m k {\displaystyle S_{mk}^{}}

1245-529: A vector processor. Although vector supercomputers resembling the Cray-1 are less popular these days, NEC has continued to make this type of computer up to the present day with their SX series of computers. Most recently, the SX-Aurora TSUBASA places the processor and either 24 or 48 gigabytes of memory on an HBM 2 module within a card that physically resembles a graphics coprocessor, but instead of serving as

1328-551: Is So the derivation of triangular codes of a function F ( x ) {\displaystyle F(x)} consists in determining the triangular code of the partial derivative ∂ F ( x ) ∂ y {\displaystyle {\frac {\partial F(x)}{\partial y}}} and its multiplication by the known triangular code of the derivative ∂ y ∂ x {\displaystyle {\frac {\partial y}{\partial x}}} . The determination of

1411-406: Is unable by design to cope with iteration and reduction. This is illustrated further with examples, below. Additionally, vector processors can be more resource-efficient by using slower hardware and saving power, but still achieving throughput and having less latency than SIMD, through vector chaining . Consider both a SIMD processor and a vector processor working on 4 64-bit elements, doing

1494-603: Is significantly more complex and involved than "Packed SIMD" , which is strictly limited to execution of parallel pipelined arithmetic operations only. Although the exact internal details of today's commercial GPUs are proprietary secrets, the MIAOW team was able to piece together anecdotal information sufficient to implement a subset of the AMDGPU architecture. Several modern CPU architectures are being designed as vector processors. The RISC-V vector extension follows similar principles as

1577-517: Is single-issue and uses no SIMD ALUs, only having 1-wide 64-bit LOAD, 1-wide 64-bit STORE (and, as in the Cray-1 , the ability to run MULTIPLY simultaneously with ADD), may complete the four operations faster than a SIMD processor with 1-wide LOAD, 1-wide STORE, and 2-wide SIMD. This more efficient resource utilization, due to vector chaining , is a key advantage and difference compared to SIMD. SIMD, by design and definition, cannot perform chaining except to

1660-409: Is also associated with the carry transfer to higher digits according to the scheme: Here the same transfer is carried simultaneously to two higher digits. A triangular code is called R-nary (and is denoted as T K R {\displaystyle TK_{R}} ), if the numbers α m k {\displaystyle \alpha _{mk}} take their values from

1743-415: Is an integer positive number, number of values of the figure α m 1 , m 2 , k {\displaystyle \alpha _{m1,m2,k}} , and y ( x ) ,   z ( v ) {\displaystyle y(x),~z(v)} — certain functions of arguments x ,   v {\displaystyle x,~v} correspondingly. On Figure 1

SECTION 20

#1732855476369

1826-434: Is an integer positive number, quantity of values that taken α {\displaystyle \alpha } , and y {\displaystyle y} is a certain function of argument x {\displaystyle x} . Addition of positional codes of numbers is associated with the carry transfer to a higher digit according to the scheme Addition of positional codes of one-variable functions

1909-416: Is assumed that both x and y are properly aligned here (only start on a multiple of 16) and that n is a multiple of 4, as otherwise some setup code would be needed to calculate a mask or to run a scalar version. It can also be assumed, for simplicity, that the SIMD instructions have an option to automatically repeat scalar operands, like ARM NEON can. If it does not, a "splat" (broadcast) must be used, to copy

1992-472: Is called R-nary (and is denoted as G P K R {\displaystyle GPK_{R}} ), if the numbers α m 1 , … , m a , k {\displaystyle \alpha _{m_{1},\ldots ,m_{a},k}} assume the values from the set D R {\displaystyle D_{R}} . At the codes addition G P K R {\displaystyle GPK_{R}}

2075-419: Is called R-nary (and is denoted as P K R {\displaystyle PK_{R}} ), if the numbers α m 1 , m 2 , k {\displaystyle \alpha _{m1,m2,k}} assume the values from the set D R {\displaystyle D_{R}} . At the addition of the codes P K R {\displaystyle PK_{R}}

2158-500: Is comprehensive individual element-level predicate masks on every vector instruction as is now available in ARM SVE2. And AVX-512 , almost qualifies as a vector processor. Predicated SIMD uses fixed-width SIMD ALUs but allows locally controlled (predicated) activation of units to provide the appearance of variable length vectors. Examples below help explain these categorical distinctions. SIMD, because it uses fixed-width batch processing,

2241-708: Is depicted on Figure 1. It corresponds to a "triple" sum of the form:: F ( x , v ) = ∑ k = 0 n ∑ m 1 = 0 k ∑ m 2 = 0 k α m 1 , m 2 , k R k y k − m 1 ( 1 − y ) m 1 z k − m 2 ( 1 − z ) m 2 {\displaystyle F(x,v)=\sum _{k=0}^{n}\sum _{m1=0}^{k}\sum _{m2=0}^{k}\alpha _{m1,m2,k}R^{k}y^{k-m1}(1-y)^{m1}z^{k-m2}(1-z)^{m2}} , where R {\displaystyle R}

2324-399: Is determined by the formula in R-nary triangular codes is based on using the correlation: from this it follows that the division of each digit causes carries into two lowest digits. Hence, the digits result in this operation is a sum of the quotient from the division of this digit by R and two carries from two highest digits. Thus, when divided by parameter R This procedure is described by

2407-486: Is instead "pointed to" by passing in an address to a memory location that holds the data. Decoding this address and getting the data out of the memory takes some time, during which the CPU traditionally would sit idle waiting for the requested data to show up. As CPU speeds have increased, this memory latency has historically become a large impediment to performance; see Random-access memory § Memory wall . In order to reduce

2490-453: Is not possible, then the operations take even longer because the LD may not be issued (started) at the same time as the first ADDs, and so on. If there are only 4-wide 64-bit SIMD ALUs, the completion time is even worse: only when all four LOADs have completed may the SIMD operations start, and only when all ALU operations have completed may the STOREs begin. A vector processor, by contrast, even if it

2573-458: Is that it has a single instruction decoder-broadcaster but that the cores receiving and executing that same instruction are otherwise reasonably normal: their own ALUs, their own register files, their own Load/Store units and their own independent L1 data caches. Thus although all cores simultaneously execute the exact same instruction in lock-step with each other they do so with completely different data from completely different memory locations. This

Cray SV1 - Misplaced Pages Continue

2656-480: Is that vector processors, inherently by definition and design, have always been variable-length since their inception. Whereas pure (fixed-width, no predication) SIMD is often mistakenly claimed to be "vector" (because SIMD processes data which happens to be vectors), through close analysis and comparison of historic and modern ISAs, actual vector ISAs may be observed to have the following features that no SIMD ISA has: Predicated SIMD (part of Flynn's taxonomy ) which

2739-496: Is these which somewhat deserve the nomenclature "vector processor" or at least deserve the claim of being capable of "vector processing". SIMD processors without per-element predication ( MMX , SSE , AltiVec ) categorically do not. Modern GPUs, which have many small compute units each with their own independent SIMD ALUs, use Single Instruction Multiple Threads (SIMT). SIMT units run from a shared single broadcast synchronised Instruction Unit. The "vector registers" are very wide and

2822-402: Is very costly in hardware (256 bit data paths to memory). Having 4x 64-bit ALUs, especially MULTIPLY, likewise. To avoid these high costs, a SIMD processor would have to have 1-wide 64-bit LOAD, 1-wide 64-bit STORE, and only 2-wide 64-bit ALUs. As shown in the diagram, which assumes a multi-issue execution model , the consequences are that the operations now take longer to complete. If multi-issue

2905-526: The Control Data Corporation STAR-100 and Texas Instruments Advanced Scientific Computer (ASC), which were introduced in 1974 and 1972, respectively. The basic ASC (i.e., "one pipe") ALU used a pipeline architecture that supported both scalar and vector computations, with peak performance reaching approximately 20 MFLOPS, readily achieved when processing long vectors. Expanded ALU configurations supported "two pipes" or "four pipes" with

2988-571: The Videocore IV ISA for a REP field, but unlike the STAR-100 which uses memory for its repeats, the Videocore IV repeats are on all operations including arithmetic vector operations. The repeat length can be a small range of power of two or sourced from one of the scalar registers. The Cray-1 introduced the idea of using processor registers to hold vector data in batches. The batch lengths (vector length, VL) could be dynamically set with

3071-427: The CPU, in the fashion of an assembly line , so the address decoder is constantly in use. Any particular instruction takes the same amount of time to complete, a time known as the latency , but the CPU can process an entire batch of operations, in an overlapping fashion, much faster and more efficiently than if it did so one at a time. Vector processors take this concept one step further. Instead of pipelining just

3154-664: The CPU, this would look something like this: But to a vector processor, this task looks considerably different: Note the complete lack of looping in the instructions, because it is the hardware which has performed 10 sequential operations: effectively the loop count is on an explicit per-instruction basis. Cray-style vector ISAs take this a step further and provide a global "count" register, called vector length (VL): There are several savings inherent in this approach. Additionally, in more modern vector processor ISAs, "Fail on First" or "Fault First" has been introduced (see below) which brings even more advantages. But more than that,

3237-407: The STAR-100's vectorisation was by design based around memory accesses, an extra slot of memory is now required to process the information. Two times the latency is also needed due to the extra requirement of memory access. A modern packed SIMD architecture, known by many names (listed in Flynn's taxonomy ), can do most of the operation in batches. The code is mostly similar to the scalar version. It

3320-501: The above action would be described in a single instruction (somewhat like vadd c, a, b, $ 10 ). They are also found in the x86 architecture as the REP prefix. However, only very simple calculations can be done effectively in hardware this way without a very large cost increase. Since all operands have to be in memory for the STAR-100 architecture, the latency caused by access became huge too. Broadcom included space in all vector operations of

3403-787: The addition of SIMD cannot, by itself, qualify a processor as an actual vector processor , because SIMD is fixed-length , and vectors are variable-length . The difference is illustrated below with examples, showing and comparing the three categories: Pure SIMD, Predicated SIMD, and Pure Vector Processing. Other CPU designs include some multiple instructions for vector processing on multiple (vectorized) data sets, typically known as MIMD (Multiple Instruction, Multiple Data) and realized with VLIW (Very Long Instruction Word) and EPIC (Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing). The Fujitsu FR-V VLIW/vector processor combines both technologies. SIMD instruction sets lack crucial features when compared to vector instruction sets. The most important of these

Cray SV1 - Misplaced Pages Continue

3486-415: The amount of time consumed by these steps, most modern CPUs use a technique known as instruction pipelining in which the instructions pass through several sub-units in turn. The first sub-unit reads the address and decodes it, the next "fetches" the values at those addresses, and the next does the math itself. With pipelining the "trick" is to start decoding the next instruction even before the first has left

3569-486: The carries from lower row are discarded. R-nary triangular code is accompanied by a scale factor M, similar to exponent for floating-point number. Factor M permits to display all coefficients of the coded series as integer numbers. Factor M is multiplied by R at the code truncation. For addition factors M are aligned, to do so one of added codes must be truncated. For multiplication the factors M are also multiplied. Source: Positional code for function of two variables

3652-396: The carry extends to four digits and hence R ≥ 7 {\displaystyle R\geq 7} . A positional code for the function from several variables corresponds to a sum of the form where R {\displaystyle R} is an integer positive number, number of values of the digit α m 1 , … , m

3735-427: The code T K R ′ {\displaystyle TK_{R}'^{}} and addition of the shifted code T K R ′ {\displaystyle TK_{R}'^{}} with the part-product (as in the positional codes of numbers). of R-nary triangular codes. The derivative of function F ( x ) {\displaystyle F(x)} , defined above,

3818-407: The code are reduced R times, and the fractional parts of these coefficients are discarded. The first term of the series is also discarded. Such reduction is acceptable if it is known that the series of functions converge. Truncation consists in subsequently performed one-digit operations of division by parameter R. The one-digit operations in all the digits of a row are performed simultaneously, and

3901-431: The decoding of the more common instructions such as normal adding. ( This can be somewhat mitigated by keeping the entire ISA to RISC principles: RVV only adds around 190 vector instructions even with the advanced features. ) Vector processors were traditionally designed to work best only when there are large amounts of data to be worked on. For this reason, these sorts of CPUs were found primarily in supercomputers , as

3984-482: The difference between a traditional vector processor and a modern SIMD one. The example starts with a 32-bit integer variant of the "DAXPY" function, in C : In each iteration, every element of y has an element of x multiplied by a and added to it. The program is expressed in scalar linear form for readability. The scalar version of this would load one of each of x and y, process one calculation, store one result, and loop: The STAR-like code remains concise, but because

4067-533: The difficulties with the ILLIAC concept with its own Distributed Array Processor (DAP) design, categorising the ILLIAC and DAP as cellular array processors that potentially offered substantial performance benefits over conventional vector processor designs such as the CDC STAR-100 and Cray 1. A computer for operations with functions was presented and developed by Kartsev in 1967. The first vector supercomputers are

4150-494: The early 1970s and dominated supercomputer design through the 1970s into the 1990s, notably the various Cray platforms. The rapid fall in the price-to-performance ratio of conventional microprocessor designs led to a decline in vector supercomputers during the 1990s. Vector processing development began in the early 1960s at the Westinghouse Electric Corporation in their Solomon project. Solomon's goal

4233-625: The early vector processors, and is being implemented in commercial products such as the Andes Technology AX45MPV. There are also several open source vector processor architectures being developed, including ForwardCom and Libre-SOC . As of 2016 most commodity CPUs implement architectures that feature fixed-length SIMD instructions. On first inspection these can be considered a form of vector processing because they operate on multiple (vectorized, explicit length) data sets, and borrow features from vector processors. However, by definition,

SECTION 50

#1732855476369

4316-418: The entire group of results. In general terms, CPUs are able to manipulate one or two pieces of data at a time. For instance, most CPUs have an instruction that essentially says "add A to B and put the result in C". The data for A, B and C could be—in theory at least—encoded directly into the instruction. However, in efficient implementation things are rarely that simple. The data is rarely sent in raw form, and

4399-481: The following equalities are valid: where a {\displaystyle a} is an arbitrary number. There exists T K R {\displaystyle TK_{R}} of an arbitrary integer real number. In particular, T K R ( α ) = α {\displaystyle TK_{R}(\alpha )=\alpha } . Also there exists T K R {\displaystyle TK_{R}} of any function of

4482-431: The form y k {\displaystyle y^{k}} . For instance, T K R ( y 2 ) = ( 0   0   1 ) {\displaystyle TK_{R}(y^{2})=(0\ 0\ 1)} . in R-nary triangular codes consists in the following: This procedure is described (as also for one-digit addition of the numbers) by a table of one-digit addition, where all

4565-614: The form with integer coefficients A k {\displaystyle A_{k}} , may be represented by R-nary triangular codes, for these coefficients and functions y k {\displaystyle y^{k}} have R-nary triangular codes (which was mentioned in the beginning of the section). On the other hand, R-nary triangular code may be represented by the said series, as any term α m k R k y k ( 1 − y ) m {\displaystyle \alpha _{mk}R^{k}y^{k}(1-y)^{m}} in

4648-510: The form of an array. In 1962, Westinghouse cancelled the project, but the effort was restarted by the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign as the ILLIAC IV . Their version of the design originally called for a 1 GFLOPS machine with 256 ALUs, but, when it was finally delivered in 1972, it had only 64 ALUs and could reach only 100 to 150 MFLOPS. Nevertheless, it showed that the basic concept

4731-439: The form: and so it is flat and "triangular", as the digits in it comprise a triangle. The value of the positional number A {\displaystyle A} above is that of the sum where ρ {\displaystyle \rho } is the radix of the said number system. The positional code of a one-variable function correspond to a 'double' code of the form where R {\displaystyle R}

4814-554: The high-end market again with its ETA-10 machine, but it sold poorly and they took that as an opportunity to leave the supercomputing field entirely. In the early and mid-1980s Japanese companies ( Fujitsu , Hitachi and Nippon Electric Corporation (NEC) introduced register-based vector machines similar to the Cray-1, typically being slightly faster and much smaller. Oregon -based Floating Point Systems (FPS) built add-on array processors for minicomputers , later building their own minisupercomputers . Throughout, Cray continued to be

4897-447: The instruction itself that the instruction will operate again on another item of data, at an address one increment larger than the last. This allows for significant savings in decoding time. To illustrate what a difference this can make, consider the simple task of adding two groups of 10 numbers together. In a normal programming language one would write a "loop" that picked up each of the pairs of numbers in turn, and then added them. To

4980-416: The instructions, they also pipeline the data itself. The processor is fed instructions that say not just to add A to B, but to add all of the numbers "from here to here" to all of the numbers "from there to there". Instead of constantly having to decode instructions and then fetch the data needed to complete them, the processor reads a single instruction from memory, and it is simply implied in the definition of

5063-463: The memory load and store speed correspondingly had to increase as well. This is sometimes claimed to be a disadvantage of Cray-style vector processors: in reality it is part of achieving high performance throughput, as seen in GPUs , which face exactly the same issue. Modern SIMD computers claim to improve on early Cray by directly using multiple ALUs, for a higher degree of parallelism compared to only using

SECTION 60

#1732855476369

5146-493: The next operation, the Cray design would load a smaller section of the vector into registers and then apply as many operations as it could to that data, thereby avoiding many of the much slower memory access operations. The Cray design used pipeline parallelism to implement vector instructions rather than multiple ALUs. In addition, the design had completely separate pipelines for different instructions, for example, addition/subtraction

5229-405: The nodes correspond to digits α m 1 , m 2 , k {\displaystyle \alpha _{m1,m2,k}} , and in the circles the values of indexes m 1 , m 2 , k {\displaystyle {m1,m2,k}} of the corresponding digit are shown. The positional code of the function of two variables is called "pyramidal". Positional code

5312-536: The normal scalar pipeline. Modern vector processors (such as the SX-Aurora TSUBASA ) combine both, by issuing multiple data to multiple internal pipelined SIMD ALUs, the number issued being dynamically chosen by the vector program at runtime. Masks can be used to selectively load and store data in memory locations, and use those same masks to selectively disable processing element of SIMD ALUs. Some processors with SIMD ( AVX-512 , ARM SVE2 ) are capable of this kind of selective, per-element ( "predicated" ) processing, and it

5395-419: The operations of this computing machine were the functions addition, subtraction and multiplication, functions comparison, the same operations between a function and a number, finding the function maximum, computing indefinite integral , computing definite integral of derivative of two functions, derivative of two functions, shift of a function along the X-axis etc. By its architecture this computing machine

5478-510: The performance leader, continually beating the competition with a series of machines that led to the Cray-2 , Cray X-MP and Cray Y-MP . Since then, the supercomputer market has focused much more on massively parallel processing rather than better implementations of vector processors. However, recognising the benefits of vector processing, IBM developed Virtual Vector Architecture for use in supercomputers coupling several scalar processors to act as

5561-857: The performance. The SV1 processor was clocked at 300 MHz. Later variants of the SV1, the SV1e and SV1ex , ran at 500 MHz, the latter also having faster memory and support for the SSD-I Solid-State Storage Device. Systems could include up to 32 processors with up to 512 shared memory buses. Multiple SV1 cabinets could be clustered together using the GigaRing I/O channel, which also provided connection to HIPPI , FDDI , ATM , Ethernet and SCSI devices for network, disk, and tape services. In theory, up to 32 nodes could be clustered together, offering up to one teraflops in theoretical peak performance. Vector processor Vector machines appeared in

5644-528: The pipelines tend to be long. The "threading" part of SIMT involves the way data is handled independently on each of the compute units. In addition, GPUs such as the Broadcom Videocore IV and other external vector processors like the NEC SX-Aurora TSUBASA may use fewer vector units than the width implies: instead of having 64 units for a 64-number-wide register, the hardware might instead do

5727-405: The positional expansion of the function (corresponding to this code) may be represented by a similar series. of R-nary triangular codes. This is the name of an operation of reducing the number of "non"-zero columns. The necessity of truncation appears at the emergence of carries beyond the digit net. The truncation consists in division by parameter R. All coefficients of the series represented by

5810-524: The same UNIX-derived UNICOS operating system . The SV1 used Cray floating point representation, not the IEEE 754 floating point format used on the Cray T3E and some Cray T90 systems. Unlike earlier Cray designs, the SV1 included a vector cache. It also introduced a feature called multi-streaming, in which one processor from each of four processor boards work together to form a virtual processor with four times

5893-449: The scalar argument across a SIMD register: Computer for operations with functions Within computer engineering and computer science , a computer for operations with (mathematical) functions (unlike the usual computer ) operates with functions at the hardware level (i.e. without programming these operations). A computing machine for operations with functions was presented and developed by Mikhail Kartsev in 1967. Among

5976-593: The set For example, a triangular code is a ternary code T K 3 {\displaystyle TK_{3}} , if α m k ∈ ( − 1 , 0 , 1 ) {\displaystyle \alpha _{mk}\in (-1,0,1)} , and quaternary T K 4 {\displaystyle TK_{4}} , if α m k ∈ ( − 2 , − 1 , 0 , 1 ) {\displaystyle \alpha _{mk}\in (-2,-1,0,1)} . For R -nary triangular codes

6059-461: The supercomputers themselves were, in general, found in places such as weather prediction centers and physics labs, where huge amounts of data are "crunched". However, as shown above and demonstrated by RISC-V RVV the efficiency of vector ISAs brings other benefits which are compelling even for Embedded use-cases. The vector pseudocode example above comes with a big assumption that the vector computer can process more than ten numbers in one batch. For

6142-449: The table of one-digit division by parameter R, where all the values of terms and all values of carries, appearing at the decomposition of the sum S m k = σ m k + p m k / R {\displaystyle S_{mk}^{}=\sigma _{mk}+p_{mk}/R} , must be present. Such table may be synthesized for R > 2. {\displaystyle R>2.} Below

6225-400: The table will be given for the one-digit division by the parameter R for R = 3 {\displaystyle R=3} : of R-nary triangular codes consists (as in positional codes of numbers) in subsequently performed one-digit operations. Mind that the one-digit operations in all digits of each column are performed simultaneously. of R-nary triangular codes. Multiplication of

6308-414: The time required to fetch the data from memory. Not all problems can be attacked with this sort of solution. Including these types of instructions necessarily adds complexity to the core CPU. That complexity typically makes other instructions run slower—i.e., whenever it is not adding up many numbers in a row. The more complex instructions also add to the complexity of the decoders, which might slow down

6391-486: The triangular code of the partial derivative ∂ F ( x ) ∂ y {\displaystyle {\frac {\partial F(x)}{\partial y}}} is based on the correlation The derivation method consists of organizing carries from mk-digit into (m+1,k)-digit and into (m-1,k)-digit, and their summing in the given digit is performed in the same way as in one-digit addition. of R-nary triangular codes. A function represented by series of

6474-575: The values of the terms α m k ∈ D R {\displaystyle \alpha _{mk}\in D_{R}} and β m k ∈ D R {\displaystyle \beta _{mk}\in D_{R}} must be present and all the values of carries appearing at decomposition of the sum S m k = σ m k + R p m k {\displaystyle S_{mk}^{}=\sigma _{mk}+Rp_{mk}} . Such

6557-448: Was (using the modern terminology) a vector processor or array processor , a central processing unit (CPU) that implements an instruction set containing instructions that operate on one-dimensional arrays of data called vectors . In it there has been used the fact that many of these operations may be interpreted as the known operation on vectors: addition and subtraction of functions - as addition and subtraction of vectors, computing

6640-418: Was first fully exploited in 1976 by the famous Cray-1 . Instead of leaving the data in memory like the STAR-100 and ASC, the Cray design had eight vector registers , which held sixty-four 64-bit words each. The vector instructions were applied between registers, which is much faster than talking to main memory. Whereas the STAR-100 would apply a single operation across a long vector in memory and then move on to

6723-505: Was implemented in different hardware than multiplication. This allowed a batch of vector instructions to be pipelined into each of the ALU subunits, a technique they called vector chaining . The Cray-1 normally had a performance of about 80 MFLOPS, but with up to three chains running it could peak at 240 MFLOPS and averaged around 150 – far faster than any machine of the era. Other examples followed. Control Data Corporation tried to re-enter

6806-514: Was sound, and, when used on data-intensive applications, such as computational fluid dynamics , the ILLIAC was the fastest machine in the world. The ILLIAC approach of using separate ALUs for each data element is not common to later designs, and is often referred to under a separate category, massively parallel computing. Around this time Flynn categorized this type of processing as an early form of single instruction, multiple threads (SIMT). International Computers Limited sought to avoid many of

6889-466: Was to dramatically increase math performance by using a large number of simple coprocessors under the control of a single master Central processing unit (CPU). The CPU fed a single common instruction to all of the arithmetic logic units (ALUs), one per cycle, but with a different data point for each one to work on. This allowed the Solomon machine to apply a single algorithm to a large data set , fed in

#368631