Misplaced Pages

#203796

58-399: The word "leet", as used in reference to special court proceedings, dates from the late 13th century, from Anglo-French lete and Anglo-Latin leta of unknown origin, with a possible connection to the verb " let ". At a very early time in medieval England, the lord of the manor exercised or claimed certain feudal rights over his serfs and feudal tenants . The exercise of those rights

116-418: A breach of the contract by one of the parties. Under common law, a liquidated damages clause will not be enforced if the purpose of the term is solely to punish a breach (in this case it is termed penal damages ). The clause will be enforceable if it involves a genuine attempt to quantify a loss in advance and is a good faith estimate of economic loss. Courts have ruled as excessive and invalidated damages which

174-399: A business. Damages in tort are awarded generally to place the claimant in the position in which he would have been had the tort not taken place. Damages for breach of contract are generally awarded to place the claimant in the position in which he would have been had the contract not been breached. This can often result in a different measure of damages. In cases where it is possible to frame

232-456: A claim in either contract or tort, it is necessary to be aware of what gives the best outcome. If the transaction was a "good bargain", contract generally gives a better result for the claimant. As an example, Neal agrees to sell Mary an antique Rolex watch for £100. In fact the watch is a fake and worth only £50. If it had been a genuine antique Rolex, it would have been worth £500. Neal is in breach of contract and could be sued. In contract, Mary

290-481: A form of damages, called, aggravated damages, that are similar to punitive or exemplary damages. Aggravated damages are not often awarded; they apply where the injury has been aggravated by the wrongdoer's behaviour, for example, their cruelty. In certain areas of the law another head of damages has long been available, whereby the defendant is made to give up the profits made through the civil wrong in restitution . Doyle and Wright define restitutionary damages as being

348-519: A jury formed from the freehold tenants, as bondsmen could not give an oath ( jury means persons having taken an oath). The jury's role was similar to that of the doomsmen of the Anglo-Saxons and included electing the officers (other than the Steward who was appointed by the lord), bringing matters to the attention of the court and deciding on them. The officers of courts leet could include some or all of

406-491: A monetary remedy that is measured according to the defendant's gain rather than the plaintiff's loss. The plaintiff thereby gains damages which are not measured by reference to any loss sustained. In some areas of the law this heading of damages is uncontroversial; most particularly intellectual property rights and breach of fiduciary relationship. In England and Wales the House of Lords case of Attorney-General v. Blake opened up

464-452: A plaintiff would recover is usually measured on a "loss of bargain" basis, also known as expectation loss, or "economic loss". This concept reflects the difference between "the value of what has been received and its value as represented". Damages are usually assessed at the date of the wrongful act, but in England and Wales , Pelling J has observed that this is not the case if justice requires

522-442: A remedy for each social ill and inconvenience. To take cognisance of grosser crimes of assault, arson, burglary, larceny, manslaughter, murder, treason, and every felony at common law. The court generally sat only a few times each year, sometimes just annually. A matter was introduced into the court by means of a "presentment", from a local man or from the jury itself. Penalties were in the form of fines or imprisonment. Attendance at

580-426: A sharp distinction between the court baron, exercising strictly manorial rights , and the court leet, exercising the powers formerly held by the hundred court, emphasising that the ability to hold court leet depended upon a royally granted franchise. However, in many areas it became customary for the court baron and court leet to meet together, as a single operation. The court leet was a court of record , and its duty

638-605: A victory for the NFL. Historically, one of the best known nominal damage awards was the farthing that the jury awarded to James Whistler in his libel suit against John Ruskin . In the English jurisdiction, nominal damages are generally fixed at £5. Many times a party that has been wronged but is not able to prove significant damages will sue for nominal damages. This is particularly common in cases involving alleged violations of constitutional rights, such as freedom of speech. Until 2021, in

SECTION 10

#1732843934204

696-405: Is entitled to an item worth £500, but she has only one worth £50. Her damages are £450. Neal also induced Mary to enter into the contract through a misrepresentation (a tort). If Mary sues in tort, she is entitled to damages that put her back to the same financial position place she would have been in had the misrepresentation not been made. She would clearly not have entered into the contract knowing

754-427: Is established when the claimant proves, on the balance of probabilities, that a defendant's wrongful act caused a tangible, harm, loss or injury to the plaintiff. Once that threshold is met, the plaintiff is entitled to some amount of recovery for that loss or injury. No recovery is not an option. The court must then assess the amount of compensation attributable to the harmful acts of the defendant. The amount of damages

812-712: Is not easily quantifiable, and depends on the individual circumstances of the claimant. Judges in the United Kingdom base the award on damages awarded in similar previous cases. In 2012 the Court of Appeal of England and Wales noted that this court has not merely the power, but a positive duty, to monitor, and where appropriate to alter, the guideline rates for general damages in personal injury actions. General damages in England and Wales were increased by 10% for all cases where judgements were given after 1 April 2013, following changes to

870-466: Is usually seen as based on denying a wrongdoer any profit from his wrongdoing. The really difficult question, and one which is currently unanswered, relates to what wrongs should allow this remedy. In addition to damages, the successful party is often entitled to be awarded their reasonable legal costs that they spent during the case. This is the rule in most countries other than the United States. In

928-466: The Administration of Justice Act 1977 . However, one exception was allowed: the court leet for the manor of Laxton, Nottinghamshire , which had continued to operate judicially; Laxton retains the open-field system of farming, which had been replaced everywhere else by the 18th century (as a result of the process of enclosure ), and required the court in order to administer the field system. Although

986-524: The Roman Empire around the year 410. The Vita Sancti Cuthberti ( c.  699 –705) is the first piece of Northumbrian Latin writing and the earliest piece of English Latin hagiography. The Historia Brittonum composed in the 9th century is traditionally ascribed to Nennius . It is the earliest source which presents King Arthur as a historical figure, and is the source of several stories which were repeated and amplified by later authors. In

1044-530: The Saxons , a monetary value called a weregild was assigned to every human being and every piece of property in the Salic Code . If property was stolen or someone was injured or killed, the guilty person had to pay the weregild as restitution to the victim's family or to the owner of the property. Recovery of damages by a plaintiff in lawsuit is subject to the legal principle that damages must be proximately caused by

1102-430: The 10th century the hermeneutic style became dominant, but post- conquest writers such as William of Malmesbury condemned it as barbarous. Nominal damages At common law , damages are a remedy in the form of a monetary award to be paid to a claimant as compensation for loss or injury. To warrant the award, the claimant must show that a breach of duty has caused foreseeable loss. To be recognized at law,

1160-508: The Administration of Justice Act had abolished the legal jurisdiction of the other courts leet, it emphasised that "any such court may continue to sit and transact such other business, if any, as was customary for it". Schedule 4 to the Act specified the "business" which was to be considered customary, which included the taking of presentments relating to matters of local concern and – in some cases –

1218-493: The United States, there was a circuit split as to whether nominal damages may be used if a constitutional violation had occurred but has since been rendered moot . The Supreme Court decided 8–1 in the 2021 case Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski that nominal damages are appropriate means to redress violated rights otherwise now rendered moot. Contemptuous damages are a form of damage award available in some jurisdictions. They are similar to nominal damages awards, as they are given when

SECTION 20

#1732843934204

1276-442: The assessment of damages to be calculated at some other date. In Murfin v Ford Campbell , an agreement had been entered into whereby company shares were exchanged for loan notes , which could only be redeemed if certain profit thresholds had been achieved in the relevant accounting years. As the thresholds were not met, the loan notes were not redeemable, but at the date of the advisors' breach of contract this could not be known, only

1334-547: The circumstances set out by Lord Devlin in the leading case of Rookes v. Barnard . They are: Rookes v Barnard has been much criticized and has not been followed in Canada or Australia or by the Privy Council . Punitive damages awarded in a US case would be difficult to get recognition for in a European court, where punitive damages are most likely to be considered to violate ordre public . Some jurisdictions recognize

1392-487: The claimant for loss, injury, or harm suffered by the claimant as a result of another's breach of duty that caused the loss. For example, compensatory damages may be awarded as the result of a negligence claim under tort law. Expectation damages are used in contract law to put an injured party in the position it would have occupied but for the breach. Compensatory damages can be classified as special damages and general damages. Liability for payment of an award of damages

1450-498: The claimant for the quantifiable monetary losses he has suffered. For example, extra costs, repair or replacement of damaged property, lost earnings (both historically and in the future), loss of irreplaceable items, additional domestic costs, and so on. They are seen in both personal and commercial actions. Special damages can include direct losses (such as amounts the claimant had to spend to try to mitigate damages) and consequential or economic losses resulting from lost profits in

1508-415: The costs needed to remedy problems and put things right. The largest element is likely to be the reinstatement of property damage. Take for example a factory which was burnt down by the negligence of a contractor. The claimant would be entitled to the direct costs required to rebuild the factory and replace the damaged machinery. The claimant may also be entitled to any consequential losses. These may include

1566-427: The court leet was often compulsory for those under its jurisdiction, with fines being meted out for non-attendance. The ability of the court to levy a fine was always subject to limitations, but the limits were never updated to account for inflation over the centuries; for those courts leet that still exist, the fine has effectively become merely nominal – 2p for example in the case of Laxton. Courts leet generally had

1624-553: The courts which are "similar" to the case in hand. The Judicial College 's Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases are adjusted following periodic review of the awards which have been made by the courts since the previous review. The guidance which solicitors will take into account to help quantify general damages are: When a personal injury claim is settled either in court or out of court,

1682-413: The degree of harm to the plaintiff. Lawmakers will provide for statutory damages for acts in which it is difficult to determine the value of the harm to the victim. Mere violation of the law can entitle the victim to a statutory award, even if no actual injury occurred. These are different from nominal damages, in which no written sum is specified. Nominal damages are very small damages awarded to show that

1740-596: The following courts leet was preserved by the 1977 Act, but it is not clear whether they are still operative: The following courts leet are also listed here for unclear reasons, despite not having been exempted from abolition by the 1977 act, and despite it not being clear whether they are still operative: Anglo-Latin Anglo-Latin literature is literature from originally written in Latin and produced in England or other English-speaking parts of Britain and Ireland . It

1798-480: The following: The introduction of magistrates gradually rebalanced power away from manorial lords. Magistrates were later given authority over view of frankpledge , which effectively negated the remaining significance of the court leet, and they gradually ceased to be held, largely dying out. Following the collapse of the feudal system, and subsequent rise of the Reformation , civil parishes had largely taken over

Court leet - Misplaced Pages Continue

1856-561: The instructing solicitor will usually employ a specialist expert actuary or accountant to assist with the quantification of the loss. General damages are monetary compensation for the non-monetary aspects of the specific harm suffered. These damages are sometimes termed "pain, suffering and loss of amenity". Examples of this include physical or emotional pain and suffering, loss of companionship, loss of consortium , disfigurement, loss of reputation, impairment of mental or physical capacity, hedonic damages or loss of enjoyment of life, etc. This

1914-444: The jury indicted wrongdoers, stood witness, and helped decide on punishment. It also developed as a means of proactively ensuring that standards in such matters as sales of food and drink, and agriculture, were adhered to. The Alcester Court Leet contained the following wording: To enquire regularly and periodically into the proper condition of watercourses, roads, paths, and ditches; to guard against all manner of encroachments upon

1972-454: The king formally granted certain trusted lords with the legal authority that had been held by the hundred court over the tithings in the lord's manor, the most important of those being view of frankpledge . The group of tithings that were located within each manor had come to be called a leet , and hence, in the later Middle Ages these judicial powers came to be called court leet . The quo warranto proceedings of Edward I established

2030-426: The loan notes' face value could be known. The conclusion was that in this case valuation could not be done until after the profit performance became known. In his judgement Pelling also referred to the case of Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Scrimgeour Vickers (Asset Management) Ltd , a case where continuing misrepresentation affected the appropriate date for damages to be assessed. Special damages compensate

2088-523: The loss must involve damage to property, or mental or physical injury; pure economic loss is rarely recognized for the award of damages. Compensatory damages are further categorized into special damages, which are economic losses such as loss of earnings, property damage and medical expenses, and general damages, which are non-economic damages such as pain and suffering and emotional distress. Rather than being compensatory, at common law damages may instead be nominal, contemptuous or exemplary . Among

2146-548: The loss or harm suffered was technical rather than actual. Perhaps the most famous nominal damages award in modern times has been the $ 1 verdict against the National Football League (NFL) in the 1986 antitrust suit prosecuted by the United States Football League . Although the verdict was automatically trebled pursuant to antitrust law in the United States , the resulting $ 3 judgment was regarded as

2204-565: The lost profits that the claimant could have been expected to make in the period whilst the factory was closed and rebuilt. On a breach of contract by a defendant, a court generally awards the sum that would restore the injured party to the economic position they expected from performance of the promise or promises (known as an " expectation measure " or "benefit-of-the-bargain" measure of damages). This rule, however, has attracted increasing scrutiny from Australian courts and legal commentators. A judge arrives compensatory number by considering both

2262-399: The management of common land . The following courts leet were exempted from abolition by the Administration of Justice Act 1977, and were known to be still functioning in 2010: In addition, the following courts leet are in operation, having been re-established, or continued, but without statutory authority (not having been preserved by the 1977 act): By contrast, the statutory backing for

2320-419: The most common way the compensation payment is made is by a lump sum award in full and final settlement of the claim. Once accepted there can be no further award for compensation at a later time unless the claim is settled by provisional damages often found in industrial injury claims such as asbestos related injuries. Statutory damages are an amount stipulated within the statute rather than calculated based on

2378-607: The options available to personal injury claimants wanting to cover the cost of their litigation. General damages are generally awarded only in claims brought by individuals, when they have suffered personal harm. Examples would be personal injury (following the tort of negligence by the defendant), or the tort of defamation . The quantification of personal injury is not an exact science. In English law solicitors treat personal injury claims as "general damages" for pain and suffering and loss of amenity (PSLA). Solicitors quantify personal injury claims by reference to previous awards made by

Court leet - Misplaced Pages Continue

2436-509: The parties contracted as liquidated, but which the court nonetheless found to be penal. To determine whether a clause is a liquidated damages clause or a penalty clause, it is necessary to consider: Damages in tort are generally awarded to place the claimant in the position that would have been taken had the tort not taken place. Damages in tort are quantified under two headings: general damages and special damages. In personal injury claims, damages for compensation are quantified by reference to

2494-464: The perpetrators among them. If the wrongdoing was minor, it would be dealt with by the hundred court, but serious crimes were passed up to the shire court . Before feudalism, hundred courts had also dealt with administrative matters within their area, such as bridge repairs, road conditions, and so forth, but the courts baron had largely superseded that in practice, and some manorial lords began claiming authority over criminal matters as well. Eventually,

2552-464: The plaintiff's suit is trivial, used only to settle a point of honor or law. Awards are usually of the smallest amount, usually 1 cent or similar. The key distinction is that in jurisdictions that follow the loser-pays for attorney fees, the claimant in a contemptuous damages case may be required to pay their own attorney fees. Traditionally, the court awarded the smallest coin in the Realm, which in England

2610-479: The possibility of restitutionary damages for breach of contract. In this case the profits made by a defecting spy, George Blake , for the publication of his book, were awarded to the British Government for breach of contract. The case has been followed in English courts, but the situations in which restitutionary damages will be available remain unclear. The basis for restitutionary damages is much debated, but

2668-402: The public rights, whether by unlawful enclosure or otherwise; to preserve landmarks, to keep watch and ward in the town, and overlook the common lands, adjust the rights over them, and restraining in any case their excessive exercise, as in the pasturage of cattle; to guard against the adulteration of food, to inspect weights and measures, to look in general to the morals of the people, and to find

2726-528: The quantum in negligence where the maxim 'Intended consequences are never too remote' applies: 'never' is inaccurate here but resorts to unforeseeable direct and natural consequences of an act. It may be useful for the lawyers, the plaintiff and/or the defendant to employ forensic accountants or someone trained in the relevant field of economics to give evidence on the value of the loss. In this case, they may be called upon to give opinion evidence as an expert witness . Compensatory damages are paid to compensate

2784-417: The remaining authority of courts baron, and tithings were seen as a parish sub-division. Nevertheless, courts leet technically survived into the late 20th century, though almost all of the small number which still operated had become merely ceremonial, simply forming a way of promoting or celebrating their local area. Despite this, their legal jurisdiction over crime was only abolished in 1977, by section 23 of

2842-542: The severity of the injuries sustained (see below general damages for more details). In non-personal injury claims, for instance, a claim for professional negligence against solicitors, the measure of damages will be assessed by the loss suffered by the client due to the negligent act or omission by the solicitor giving rise to the loss. The loss must be reasonably foreseeable and not too remote . Financial losses are usually simple to quantify but in complex cases which involve loss of pension entitlements and future loss projections,

2900-477: The type of contract, and the loss incurred. When it is either not possible or not desirable to award the victim in that way, a court may award money damages designed to restore the injured party to the economic position they occupied at the time the contract was entered (known as the " reliance measure ") or designed to prevent the breaching party from being unjustly enriched ("restitution") (see below). Parties may contract for liquidated damages to be paid upon

2958-570: The watch was fake and is entitled to her £100 back. Thus her damages in tort are £100. (She would have to return the watch, or else her damages would be £50.) If the transaction were a "bad bargain", tort gives a better result for the claimant. If in the above example, Mary had overpaid, paying £750 for the watch, her damages in the contract would still be £450 (giving her the item she contracted to buy), however, in tort damages are £750. Special damages are sometimes divided into incidental damages , and consequential damages . Incidental losses include

SECTION 50

#1732843934204

3016-554: The wrongful conduct of the defendant. This is known as the principle of proximate cause. This principle governs the recovery of all compensatory damages, whether the underlying claim is based on contract, tort, or both. Damages are likely to be limited to those reasonably foreseeable by the defendant. If a defendant could not reasonably have foreseen that someone might be hurt by their actions, there may be no liability. This rule does not usually apply to intentional torts (for example, tort of deceit ), and also has stunted applicability to

3074-443: Was an area of 10 hides, which therefore originally corresponded to about 10 households. The heads of each household were judicially bound to the others in their tithing by an arrangement called frankpledge , which created collective responsibility for behaviour within their tithing. The hundred court monitored this system, in a process called view of frankpledge , with the tithing reporting any wrongdoing in their area, and handing over

3132-435: Was combined with manorial administrative concerns , in his court baron . However this court had no power to deal with criminal acts . Criminal jurisdiction was held by the hundred courts ; the country was divided into hundreds , and there was a hundred court for each of them. Each hundred comprised 100 hides , with each hide being an area of land of variable size that is enough to support one entire household. A tithing

3190-579: Was egregiously insidious and are over and above the amount of compensatory damages, such as in the event of malice or intent . Great judicial restraint is expected to be exercised in their application. In the United States punitive damages awards are subject to the limitations imposed by the due process of law clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution . In England and Wales , exemplary damages are limited to

3248-407: Was not only to view the pledges, which were the freemen's oaths of peacekeeping and good practice in trade, but also to try with a jury , and punish, crimes committed within the jurisdiction; more serious crimes were committed to the king's justices. Despite the presence of a jury, it was not trial by jury as understood today. The court leet had developed while the jury system was still evolving;

3306-461: Was one farthing, 1/960 of a pound before decimalisation in the 1970s. Court costs are not awarded. Generally, punitive damages , which are also termed exemplary damages in the United Kingdom, are not awarded in order to compensate the plaintiff, but in order to reform or deter the defendant and similar persons from pursuing a course of action such as that which damaged the plaintiff. Punitive damages are awarded only in special cases where conduct

3364-465: Was written in Medieval Latin , which differs from the earlier Classical Latin and Late Latin . Chroniclers such as Bede (672/3–735), with his Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum , and Gildas (c. 500–570), with his De Excidio et Conquestu Britanniae , were figures in the development of indigenous Latin literature , mostly ecclesiastical, in the centuries following the withdrawal of

#203796