Misplaced Pages

Report of the committee of inquiry on industrial democracy

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Workers' control is participation in the management of factories and other commercial enterprises by the people who work there. It has been variously advocated by anarchists , socialists , communists , social democrats , distributists and Christian democrats , and has been combined with various socialist and mixed economy systems.

#553446

53-476: The Report of the committee of inquiry on industrial democracy (1977) Cmnd 6706, also the Bullock Report for short, was a report proposing for a form of worker participation or workers' control , chaired by Alan Bullock . The idea was seen by some as a way to solve the chronic industrial disputes and to enhance participation of employees in their workplace. A Committee of Enquiry into Industrial Democracy

106-401: A large amount of administrative work for individual workers, who would have to plan their consumption in advance, and a new bureaucratic class. Proponents of parecon argue that capitalist economies are hardly free of bureaucracy or meetings, and a parecon would eliminate banks, advertising, stock market, tax returns and long-term financial planning. Albert and Hahnel claim that it is probable that

159-400: A massive wave of workers' control corresponding with strikes all over the country. Some authors have argued that the green bans constitute a form of workers' control. Including: In 2015, workers took over a detergent factory that was on the verge of bankruptcy, running it as a co-operative. Around 70 bankrupted enterprises have been taken over by about 12,000 workers since 1990 as part of

212-440: A participatory economy all innovations will immediately be made available to all enterprises, so there will never be any loss of static efficiency.". The market socialist David Schweickart suggests participatory economics would be undesirable even if it was possible: It is a system obsessed with comparison (Is your job complex more empowering than mine?), with monitoring (You are not working at average intensity, mate—get with

265-486: A proposed participatory economy, key information relevant to converging on an economic plan would be made available by Iteration Facilitation Boards (IFBs), which, based on proposals from worker/consumer councils and economic data, present indicative prices and economic projections at each round of the planning process. The IFB has no decision-making authority. In theory, the IFB's activity can consist mainly of computers performing

318-519: A replacement for the mainstream conception of economic freedom , which Albert and Hahnel argue by its very vagueness has allowed it to be abused by capitalist ideologues . Albert and Hahnel claim that participatory economics has been practiced to varying degrees during the Russian Revolution of 1917, Spanish Revolution of 1936 , and occasionally in South America . A balanced job complex

371-459: A revival of the guild system. Participatory economics represents a recent variation on the idea of workers' control. Workers' control can be contrasted to control of the economy via the state, such as nationalization and central planning (see state socialism ) versus control of the means of production by owners, which workers can achieve through employer provided stock purchases, direct stock purchases, etc., as found in capitalism. During

424-494: A right to have representation for workers. A company wide codetermination referendum would be held in firms with over 2000 employees, with the entire workforce voting. After approval, only union members would be able to vote for candidates to the supervisory board. Shareholders and unions would appoint x representatives each. The deadlock breaker would be an independent y appointee from the government. The Report further recommended that nondelegable board functions would be codified as

477-626: A similar number of workers will be involved in a parecon bureaucracy as in a capitalist bureaucracy , with much of the voting achieved by computer rather than meeting, and those who are not interested in the collective consumption proposals not required to attend. Critics suggest that proposals require consideration of an unfeasibly large set of policy choices, and that lessons from planned societies show that peoples' daily needs cannot be established well in advance simply by asking people what they want. Albert and Hahnel note that markets themselves hardly adjust prices instantaneously, and suggest that in

530-471: A source of class division . Thus, a three-class view of the economy (capitalists, coordinators, and workers) is stressed, in contrast to the traditional two-class view of Marxism . The coordinator class, emphasized in parecon, refers to those who have a monopoly on empowering skills and knowledge, and corresponds to the doctors, lawyers, managers, engineers, and other professionals in present economies. Parecon advocates argue that, historically, Marxism ignored

583-449: A system based on the concept that the ultimate authority and control over a company rests with those who provide the capital (i.e. the shareholders) in general meeting. It is they who, at the outset, come together to incorporate the company as a legal entity and it is they who by the contract of incorporation embodied in the company’s original constitution agree between themselves what the company’s business and objects shall be and in what way

SECTION 10

#1732851419554

636-570: A system called Cordón industrial before being destroyed by Augusto Pinochet . Workers' control was practiced in Guangzhou in the 1920s and the Shinmin Autonomous Region from 1929 to 1931. From 1968 to 1991, there were several workplace and takeovers (mainly in agriculture) that were repressed by the state. Little knowledge exists of these in English. Workers' control occurred during

689-400: Is a collection of tasks within a given workplace that is balanced for its equity and empowerment implications against all other job complexes in that workplace. Albert and Hahnel argue that it is inequitable and ineffective to compensate people on the basis of luck (e.g. skills or talents that owe to their birth or heredity), or by virtue of workers' productivity (as measured by the value of

742-490: Is an economic system based on participatory decision making as the primary economic mechanism for allocation in society. In the system, the say in decision-making is proportional to the impact on a person or group of people. Participatory economics is a form of a socialist decentralized planned economy involving the collective ownership of the means of production . It is a proposed alternative to contemporary capitalism and centralized planning . This economic model

795-406: Is designed to avoid the creation of powerful intellectual elites or the rule of a bureaucracy , which is perceived as the major problem of the economies of the communist states of the 20th century. In their book Looking Forward Albert and Hanhel termed this situation 'coordinatorism'. Parecon advocates recognize that monopolization of empowering labor, in addition to private ownership, can be

848-714: Is primarily associated with political theorist Michael Albert and economist Robin Hahnel , who describes participatory economics as an anarchist economic vision. The underlying values that parecon seeks to implement are: equity , solidarity , diversity, workers' self-management , efficiency (defined as accomplishing goals without wasting valued assets ), and sustainability . The institutions of parecon include workers' and consumers' councils utilising self-managerial methods for decision-making, balanced job complexes, remuneration based on individual effort, and wide decentralized planning . In parecon, self-management constitutes

901-608: The Algerian Revolution , peasants and workers took control of factories, farms and offices that were abandoned, with the help of UGTA militants. Around 1,000 enterprises were placed under workers' control in 1962, with that number climbing to 23,000+ in the following years. The FLN passed laws in the newly independent Algeria which partially institutionalized workers' control, creating a bureaucracy around workers' councils that centralized them. This caused massive corruption among new managers as well productivity and enthusiasm in

954-687: The Argentine Great Depression , hundreds of workplaces were occupied and ran according to the principles of workers' control by angered unemployed people. In 2014, around 311 of these were still around, being run as worker cooperatives. Some of the notable examples include: In Northern Queensland from 1908 to 1920, the IWW and the Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union organized a degree of workers' control among meat industry workers. From 1971 to 1990, Australia saw

1007-696: The Biennio Rosso , workers, especially in Northern Italy, took control of numerous factories. In 2012, workers took over an office and former car factory, turning it into a recycling plant. During the Allied Occupation of Japan , around 100,000 workers took over 133 workplaces as strike actions. Coal mines, shoe factories, hospitals, government offices, steel works and newspapers were the main sites taken over. Workers' control had been practiced in Poland during

1060-647: The English Civil War . In the 1970s, around 260 episodes of workers' control were witnessed across the UK, including: Workers' control was practiced in Seattle in 1919 , as workers organized milk deliveries, cafeterias, firefighting and laundry before being suppressed by the government. From 1968 to 1972, General Electric experimented with workers' control in River Works , Massachusetts to great success. In Yugoslavia , there

1113-642: The Indonesian National Revolution , railway, plantation and factory workers across Java implemented workers' control from 1945 to 1946, until it was crushed by the new Indonesian Nationalist Government. In 2007, over a thousand workers in Jakarta inspired by workers' control in Argentina and Venezuela took over a textile factory in response to wage cuts, repression of a recently organized union and efforts to fire and intimidate union organizers. During

SECTION 20

#1732851419554

1166-628: The Prague Spring , by January 1969 there were councils in about 120 enterprises, representing more than 800,000 employees, or about one-sixth of the country’s workers. They were banned in May 1970 and subsequently declined. Before the Egyptian Revolution of 2011 , several factories were placed under workers' control. In 1871, the Paris Commune placed 43 enterprises under workers' control as one of

1219-470: The Revolution of 1905 , as workers protested a lack of political freedoms and poor working conditions. Workers' control also occurred in around 100 industries in the aftermath of World War I with around 500,000 participants. Notably in the short-lived Republic of Tarnobrzeg . As World War II was ending, workers took over abandoned and damaged factories and began running them between 1944 and 1947. Between

1272-629: The Revolutions in 1917 , instruments of worker representation rose up, called the Soviets. On 27 November 1917, the Council of People's Commissars (SNK) implemented a decree on workers' control. The USSR experimented with workers' control with the Kuzbass Autonomous Industrial Colony thanks to the influence from IWW from 1922 to 1926 before being destroyed by the government. During

1325-536: The Spanish Revolution of 1936 , workers' control in anarchist-controlled areas was widespread, with workers' control being practiced in factories, farms, docks, ships, utilities, railways, trams and hospitals. Workers' control was practiced in the Ceylon Transport Board from 1958 to 1978 with about 7,000 buses and 50,000 workers. Workers' control has been practiced in several cities and towns during

1378-542: The Syrian Civil War since 2012 as they maintain agriculture, run hospitals and maintain basic social services in the lack of a state. Workers' control is also practiced in Rojava , with around a third of all industry being placed under workers' control as of 2015. Workers' control was practiced in several factories and hotels during a strike wave from 1972 to 1973 over anger at the ineffective workers committees , although

1431-416: The polluter pays principle and would instead aggravate "economic injustice." Hahnel, therefore, recommends that pollution taxes be linked to cuts in regressive taxes such as social security taxes. Hahnel is also critical of the mainstream assumption that externalities are anomalous and, on the whole, insignificant to market efficiency; he asserts instead that externalities are prevalent—the rule rather than

1484-571: The (agreed upon) algorithms for adjusting prices and forecasts, with little human involvement. Robin Hahnel has argued that "participatory planning is not central planning", stating "The procedures are completely different and the incentives are completely different. And one of the important ways in which it is different from central planning is that it is incentive compatible, that is, actors have an incentive to report truthfully rather than an incentive to misrepresent their capabilities or preferences." Unlike historical examples of central planning,

1537-521: The Allied Control Council in 1946 and required by the West German government in 1952; codetermination has been mandatory in all large companies (2,000 employees) since 1976. In the early 1980s, two textile factories were taken over by their workers after going bankrupt. In the early 2010s, various workers took over a building materials factory, newspaper, radio station and hospital. During

1590-460: The ability of coordinators to become a new ruling class in a post-capitalist society. Hahnel has also written a detailed discussion of parecon's desirability compared to capitalism with respect to incentives to innovate. In capitalism, patent laws , intellectual property rights and barriers to market entry are institutional features that reward individual innovators while limiting the use of new technologies. Hahnel notes that, in contrast, "in

1643-440: The category of "central direction involving the use of coercion." Albert and Hahnel have voiced detailed critiques of centrally-planned economies in theory and practice, but are also highly-critical of capitalism . Hahnel claims "the truth is capitalism aggravates prejudice, is the most inequitable economy ever devised, is grossly inefficient—even if highly energetic—and is incompatible with both economic and political democracy. In

Report of the committee of inquiry on industrial democracy - Misplaced Pages Continue

1696-533: The choices that individuals make in between work and leisure time, and the level of danger and difficulty of a job as judged by their immediate workplace peers. Albert and Hahnel argue that decentralized planning can achieve Pareto optimum , and does so under less restrictive assumptions than free market models (see: the first fundamental theorem of welfare economics ). Their model incorporates both public goods and externalities, whereas markets do not achieve Pareto optimality when including these conditions. In

1749-583: The company shall be organised and managed. There was also strong opposition to the report from many who might have been expected to support it, including the Institute for Workers' Control . Workers%27 control Workers' councils are a form of workers' control. Council communism , such as in the early Soviet Union , advocates workers' control through workers' councils and factory committees . Syndicalism advocates workers' control through trade unions . Guild socialism advocates workers' control through

1802-485: The economic activities of millions—central direction involving the use of coercion—and voluntary cooperation, the technique of the marketplace." [...] a participatory economy can permit all to partake in economic decision making in proportion to the degree they are affected by outcomes. Since a participatory system uses a system of participatory planning instead of markets to coordinate economic activities, Friedman would have us believe that participatory planning must fall into

1855-503: The essential role of trade union organisations in this process to consider how such an extension can best be achieved ... The committee, chaired by Bullock, published its report in January 1977. This report was not unanimous. The majority report was signed by Bullock and as members of the committee: three trade unionists, two academics and a city solicitor. The key idea was that in all boards of companies with over 2000 employees, there would be

1908-406: The exception—and substantial. Ultimately, Hahnel argues that Pigovian taxes, along with associated corrective measures advanced by market economists, fall far short of adequately or fairly addressing externalities . He argues such methods are incapable of attaining accurate assessments of social costs: Markets corrected by pollution taxes only lead to the efficient amount of pollution and satisfy

1961-464: The first elections were held, mainly in state-owned industry. 500 occupations of workplaces were taken out overall, with 350 occurring between the 11th and 15 June, mostly of media outlets, health centres and public transport and government administration. These occupations were predominantly done in support of Peronism , and failed to achieve any long lasting results on the eve of the Dirty War . During

2014-602: The first experiments in modern socialism. Another famous example of workers' control is the LIP clock factory, which was occupied in 1973 and operated as a worker cooperative. Germany has a history of "Mitbestimmung" (Codetermination) since 1891 (see Codetermination in Germany ). The Weimar Republic required workers' consultative committees in every business employing 20 people, which the Nazi government abolished. Works councils were authorized by

2067-517: The goods they produce). Therefore, the primary principle of participatory economics is to reward workers for their effort and sacrifice. Additionally, participatory economics would provide exemptions from the compensation for effort principle. The starting point for the income of all workers in a participatory economy is an equal share of the social product. From this point, incomes for personal expenditures and consumption rights for public goods can be expected to diverge by small degrees, reflecting

2120-593: The government of Julius Nyerere initially supported the factory takeovers, it later repressed them, with some analysts arguing it was a form of co-optation . Workers' control was practiced by the Makhnovshchina in both factories and farms from 1918 to 1921, when it was crushed by the Red Army . Workers' control was first practiced by the Diggers , who took over abandoned farm land and formed autonomous collectives during

2173-433: The more effective will that involvement be; the more effective the involvement the greater the commitment to the company’s objectives which, in the final analysis, will be concerned with generating wealth or services for the community as a whole. Nevertheless, they did not want direct participation because they viewed shareholders to be the "owners" of companies. the fundamental basis of the joint stock company system... [is]

Report of the committee of inquiry on industrial democracy - Misplaced Pages Continue

2226-437: The parecon proposal advocates the use and adjustment of price information reflecting marginal social opportunity costs and benefits as integral elements of the planning process. Hahnel has argued emphatically against Milton Friedman 's a priori tendency to deny the possibility of alternatives: Friedman assumes away the best solution for coordinating economic activities. He simply asserts "there are only two ways of coordinating

2279-404: The polluter pays principle if the taxes are set equal to the magnitude of the damage victims suffer. But because markets are not incentive compatible for polluters and pollution victims, markets provide no reliable way to estimate the magnitudes of efficient taxes for pollutants. Ambiguity over who has the property right, polluters or pollution victims, free rider problems among multiple victims, and

2332-421: The present era of free-market triumphalism it is useful to organize a sober evaluation of capitalism responding to Friedman's claims one by one." Mainstream economists largely acknowledge the problem of externalities but believe they can be addressed either through Coasian bargaining or the use of Pigovian taxes —corrective taxes on goods that produce negative externalities. While Hahnel (and Albert) favour

2385-407: The program), with the details of consumption (How many rolls of toilet paper will I need next year? Why are some of my neighbors still using the kind not made of recycled paper?) Other criticism raised by Schweickart include: Theodore Burczak argues that it would be difficult for others to measure sacrifice in another's labor, which is largely unobservable. Participatory economics would create

2438-407: The project to fall, leading to numerous strikes by workers in protest. Following a military coup in 1965, workers' control efforts were sabotaged by the government which began to centralize the economy in the hands of the state, denying workers control. In 1973, with the end of the self-proclaimed Argentine Revolution , there was a wave of strikes and workplace occupations that rocked the country as

2491-483: The recovered factories movement, mainly in the industries of metallurgy, textiles, shoemaking, glasswork, ceramics and mining. This has been concentrated in the South and Southeast of Brazil. In 1981, workers took over BC Telephones' phone exchanges for five days in protest of layoffs and increased deskilling of work. During the presidency of Salvador Allende (1970–1973) 31 factories were placed under workers' control in

2544-477: The right to submit resolutions to shareholders concerning (1) winding up (2) capital structure changes (3) article alterations (4) dividends (5) disposal of substantial parts of the business. The board, not management, should have exclusive control of (1) appointment of management and (2) disposition of resources not concerning rules on capital structure and dividends. Shareholders would retain a veto power, however, over such decisions. The minority report, produced by

2597-508: The three industrialists on the committee, proposed a second tier board for workers to have input on. They recommended election of representatives to be open to nonunion members. The report was received with trepidation but not rejecting the principles laid down. In a publication of the City Company Law Committee, A reply to Bullock , the authors said, The more people are able to influence decisions which closely affect their work

2650-406: The transaction costs of forming and maintaining an effective coalition of pollution victims, each of whom is affected to a small but unequal degree, all combine to render market systems incapable of eliciting accurate information from pollution victims about the damages they suffer, or acting upon that information even if it were known. Although parecon falls under left-wing political tradition, it

2703-458: The use of Pigovian taxes as solutions to environmental problems within market economies (over alternatives such as the issuance of marketable permits ), he is critical about the regressive incidence of such taxes. Firms in a market economy will seek to shift the costs of taxation onto their consumers. While this might be considered a positive development in terms of incentives—since it penalizes consumers for "dirty" consumption—it fails to achieve

SECTION 50

#1732851419554

2756-549: Was a limited degree of workers' control of industry which was encoded into law in 1950. This occurred due to the Tito-Stalin Split and inspiration from the Paris Commune . However, the poorly designed, top-down nature of the workers' councils led to corruption, cynicism and inefficiencies until they were destroyed in the Yugoslav Wars . Participatory economics Participatory economics , often abbreviated Parecon ,

2809-613: Was set up by the Labour government of Harold Wilson in December 1975, in response to the European Commission 's Draft Fifth Company Law Directive which sought to harmonise worker participation in management of companies across Europe . Its terms of reference started with the words, Accepting the need for a radical extension of industrial democracy in the control of companies by means of representation on boards of directors, and accepting

#553446