Misplaced Pages

Abrial A-12 Bagoas

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The A-12 was an unusual tailless glider designed by Georges Abrial in the early 1930s. It was not a success and was abandoned in 1932.

#89910

35-564: The Abrial A-12 was unusual in having a very low aspect ratio wing, even by the standards of its time. Other tailless gliders of the 1920s, notably the Lippisch Storch series had aspect ratios of about 8, compared with the 4.75 of the Abrial. Further, where the Storchs had swept wings the Abrial's was rectangular in plan. After encouraging tests of models in the wind tunnel at St Cyr , Abrial built

70-454: A lifting body redirecting air to cause lift and also in cars with airfoil wings that redirect air to cause a downforce . It is symbolized as D i {\textstyle D_{\text{i}}} , and the lift-induced drag coefficient as C D , i {\textstyle C_{D,i}} . For a constant amount of lift, induced drag can be reduced by increasing airspeed. A counter-intuitive effect of this

105-403: A constant-chord wing of chord c and span b , the aspect ratio is given by: If the wing is swept, c is measured parallel to the direction of forward flight. For most wings the length of the chord is not a constant but varies along the wing, so the aspect ratio AR is defined as the square of the wingspan b divided by the wing area S . In symbols, For such a wing with varying chord,

140-425: A full-sized version. The Abrial's wings had the designer's own reflexed camber aerofoil . Such aerofoils are useful for tailless aircraft, because the pitching moment about the aerodynamic centre of the wing can be zero. The wings were mounted with strong dihedral and braced from above by a V- strut on each side, their apexes meeting at a faired triangular central support structure. It had control surfaces on

175-464: A given wing area, high aspect ratio wings are beneficial to flight efficiency. With C L {\displaystyle C_{L}} being a function of angle of attack, induced drag increases as the angle of attack increases. The above equation can be derived using Prandtl's lifting-line theory . Similar methods can also be used to compute the minimum induced drag for non-planar wings or for arbitrary lift distributions. According to

210-480: A high aspect ratio wing, while the Avro Vulcan has a low aspect ratio wing. They have, however, a very similar wetted aspect ratio. Lift-induced drag Lift-induced drag , induced drag , vortex drag , or sometimes drag due to lift, in aerodynamics , is an aerodynamic drag force that occurs whenever a moving object redirects the airflow coming at it. This drag force occurs in airplanes due to wings or

245-428: A high-aspect-ratio wing. However, as the flow becomes transonic and then supersonic, the shock wave first generated along the wing's upper surface causes wave drag on the aircraft, and this drag is proportional to the span of the wing. Thus a long span, valuable at low speeds, causes excessive drag at transonic and supersonic speeds. By varying the sweep the wing can be optimised for the current flight speed. However,

280-409: A higher angle of attack for the same lift, which tilts the total aerodynamic force rearwards and increases the drag component of that force. The angular deflection is small and has little effect on the lift. However, there is an increase in the drag equal to the product of the lift force and the angle through which it is deflected. Since the deflection is itself a function of the lift, the additional drag

315-434: A large cylinder of air, and a small wingspan affects a small cylinder of air. A small air cylinder must be pushed down with a greater power (energy change per unit time) than a large cylinder in order to produce an equal upward force (momentum change per unit time). This is because giving the same momentum change to a smaller mass of air requires giving it a greater velocity change, and a much greater energy change because energy

350-478: A long, narrow wing with a high aspect ratio has aerodynamic advantages like better lift-to-drag-ratio (see also details below), there are several reasons why not all aircraft have high aspect-ratio wings: Aircraft which approach or exceed the speed of sound sometimes incorporate variable-sweep wings . These wings give a high aspect ratio when unswept and a low aspect ratio at maximum sweep. In subsonic flow, steeply swept and narrow wings are inefficient compared to

385-445: A similar effect is one way to reduce induced drag. The Wright brothers used curved trailing edges on their rectangular wings. Some early aircraft had fins mounted on the tips. More recent aircraft have wingtip-mounted winglets to reduce the induced drag. Winglets also provide some benefit by increasing the vertical height of the wing system. Wingtip mounted fuel tanks and wing washout may also provide some benefit. Typically,

SECTION 10

#1732843977090

420-435: A typical twin-engine wide-body aircraft at cruise speed, induced drag is the second-largest component of total drag, accounting for approximately 37% of total drag. Skin friction drag is the largest component of total drag, at almost 48%. Reducing induced drag can therefore significantly reduce cost and environmental impact. In 1891, Samuel Langley published the results of his experiments on various flat plates. At

455-445: A wing of low aspect ratio. While induced drag is inversely proportional to the square of the wingspan, not necessarily inversely proportional to aspect ratio, if the wing area is held constant, then induced drag will be inversely proportional to aspect ratio. However, since wingspan can be increased while decreasing aspect ratio, or vice versa, the apparent relationship between aspect ratio and induced drag does not always hold. For

490-451: Is operating at its optimal aerodynamic efficiency. According to the above equations, the speed for minimum drag occurs at the speed where the induced drag is equal to the parasitic drag. This is the speed at which for unpowered aircraft, optimum glide angle is achieved. This is also the speed for greatest range (although V MD will decrease as the plane consumes fuel and becomes lighter). The speed for greatest range (i.e. distance travelled)

525-399: Is proportional to the square of the lift. The vortices created are unstable, and they quickly combine to produce wingtip vortices which trail behind the wingtip. For a planar wing with an elliptical lift distribution, induced drag D i can be calculated as follows: where From this equation it is clear that the induced drag varies with the square of the lift; and inversely with

560-416: Is proportional to the square of the velocity while momentum is only linearly proportional to the velocity. The aft-leaning component of this change in velocity is proportional to the induced drag , which is the force needed to take up that power at that airspeed. It is important to keep in mind that this is a drastic oversimplification, and an airplane wing affects a very large area around itself. Although

595-516: Is simply the reaction force of the fluid acting on the wing. An aircraft in slow flight at a high angle of attack will generate an aerodynamic reaction force with a high drag component. By increasing the speed and reducing the angle of attack, the lift generated can be held constant while the drag component is reduced. At the optimum angle of attack, total drag is minimised. If speed is increased beyond this, total drag will increase again due to increased profile drag . When producing lift, air below

630-414: Is that, up to the speed-for-minimum-drag, aircraft need less power to fly faster. Induced drag is also reduced when the wingspan is higher, or for wings with wingtip devices . The total aerodynamic force acting on a body is usually thought of as having two components, lift and drag. By definition, the component of force parallel to the oncoming flow is called drag ; and the component perpendicular to

665-405: Is the ratio of its span to its mean chord . It is equal to the square of the wingspan divided by the wing area. Thus, a long, narrow wing has a high aspect ratio, whereas a short, wide wing has a low aspect ratio. Aspect ratio and other features of the planform are often used to predict the aerodynamic efficiency of a wing because the lift-to-drag ratio increases with aspect ratio, improving

700-405: Is the speed at which a straight line from the origin is tangent to the fuel flow rate curve. The curve of range versus airspeed is normally very shallow and it is customary to operate at the speed for 99% best range since this gives 3-5% greater speed for only 1% less range. Flying higher where the air is thinner will raise the speed at which minimum drag occurs, and so permits a faster voyage for

735-415: The fuel economy in powered airplanes and the gliding angle of sailplanes. The aspect ratio AR {\displaystyle {\text{AR}}} is the ratio of the square of the wingspan b {\displaystyle b} to the projected wing area S {\displaystyle S} , which is equal to the ratio of the wingspan b {\displaystyle b} to

SECTION 20

#1732843977090

770-467: The standard mean chord SMC is defined as The performance of aspect ratio AR related to the lift-to-drag-ratio and wingtip vortices is illustrated in the formula used to calculate the drag coefficient of an aircraft C d {\displaystyle C_{d}\;} where The wetted aspect ratio considers the whole wetted surface area of the airframe, S w {\displaystyle S_{w}} , rather than just

805-456: The Persian Vizier and poisoner. Its first flights were made during the first week of July 1932. It presented so many technical problems that he abandoned development later that year. Data from Les Ailes July 1932 General characteristics Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era Aspect ratio (aeronautics) In aeronautics , the aspect ratio of a wing

840-502: The elliptical spanwise distribution of lift produces the minimum induced drag for a planar wing of a given span. A small number of aircraft have a planform approaching the elliptical — the most famous examples being the World War II Spitfire and Thunderbolt . For modern wings with winglets, the ideal lift distribution is not elliptical. For a given wing area, a high aspect ratio wing will produce less induced drag than

875-408: The equations above, for wings generating the same lift, the induced drag is inversely proportional to the square of the wingspan . A wing of infinite span and uniform airfoil segment (or a 2D wing) would experience no induced drag. The drag characteristics of a wing with infinite span can be simulated using an airfoil segment the width of a wind tunnel . An increase in wingspan or a solution with

910-486: The extra weight and complexity of a moveable wing mean that such a system is not included in many designs. The aspect ratios of birds' and bats' wings vary considerably. Birds that fly long distances or spend long periods soaring such as albatrosses and eagles often have wings of high aspect ratio. By contrast, birds which require good maneuverability, such as the Eurasian sparrowhawk , have wings of low aspect ratio. For

945-417: The oncoming flow is called lift . At practical angles of attack the lift greatly exceeds the drag. Lift is produced by the changing direction of the flow around a wing. The change of direction results in a change of velocity (even if there is no speed change), which is an acceleration. To change the direction of the flow therefore requires that a force be applied to the fluid; the total aerodynamic force

980-431: The power required to increase with increasing airspeed.) Induced drag must be added to the parasitic drag to find the total drag. Since induced drag is inversely proportional to the square of the airspeed (at a given lift) whereas parasitic drag is proportional to the square of the airspeed, the combined overall drag curve shows a minimum at some airspeed - the minimum drag speed (V MD ). An aircraft flying at this speed

1015-424: The same airspeed and the same angle of attack, plates with higher aspect ratio produced greater lift and experienced lower drag than those with lower aspect ratio. His experiments were carried out at relatively low airspeeds, slower than the speed for minimum drag. He observed that, at these low airspeeds, increasing speed required reducing power. (At higher airspeeds, parasitic drag came to dominate, causing

1050-414: The same amount of fuel. If the plane is flying at the maximum permissible speed, then there is an altitude at which the air density will be sufficient to keep it aloft while flying at the angle of attack that minimizes the drag. The optimum altitude will increase during the flight as the plane becomes lighter. The speed for maximum endurance (i.e. time in the air) is the speed for minimum fuel flow rate, and

1085-445: The square of the equivalent airspeed; and inversely with the square of the wingspan. Deviation from the non-planar wing with elliptical lift distribution are taken into account by dividing the induced drag by the span efficiency factor e {\displaystyle e} . To compare with other sources of drag, it can be convenient to express this equation in terms of lift and drag coefficients: and This indicates how, for

Abrial A-12 Bagoas - Misplaced Pages Continue

1120-430: The standard mean chord SMC {\displaystyle {\text{SMC}}} : AR ≡ b 2 S = b SMC {\displaystyle {\text{AR}}\equiv {\frac {b^{2}}{S}}={\frac {b}{\text{SMC}}}} As a useful simplification, an airplane in flight can be imagined to affect a cylinder of air with a diameter equal to the wingspan. A large wingspan affects

1155-438: The wing is at a higher pressure than the air pressure above the wing. On a wing of finite span, this pressure difference causes air to flow from the lower surface, around the wingtip, towards the upper surface. This spanwise flow of air combines with chordwise flowing air, which twists the airflow and produces vortices along the wing trailing edge. The vortices reduce the wing's ability to generate lift, so that it requires

1190-505: The wing. It is a better measure of the aerodynamic efficiency of an aircraft than the wing aspect ratio . It is defined as: where b {\displaystyle b} is span and S w {\displaystyle S_{w}} is the wetted surface . Illustrative examples are provided by the Boeing B-47 and Avro Vulcan . Both aircraft have very similar performance although they are radically different. The B-47 has

1225-459: The wings which may have operated as elevons and trapezoidal rudders mounted on triangular fins at the wing tips. The pilot's unenclosed seat was immediately in front of the central support structure, at the centre of the wing, with his feet on a rudder bar ahead of the leading edge . The Abrial landed on a skid, with little wheels under the wing tips. Abrial named the A-12 Bagoas , after

#89910