Misplaced Pages

#95904

64-605: The GDCs are not courts of record , meaning that they do not keep detailed records of their proceedings and their decisions provide no precedent to be cited in other proceedings. Proceedings before the GDC are less formal than those brought before higher courts in the state. They do not conduct jury trials ; cases are heard and decided by the judge . In civil cases, they are only empowered to award legal damages, and generally cannot provide remedies in equity , such as injunctions or declaratory judgments . The subject-matter jurisdiction of

128-400: A waiver of that counterclaim. A defendant may implead a third party anytime within ten days after service of process has been effected, up until the trial date, so long as the third party receives effective service of process. However, Virginia law prohibits a defendant from impleading a joint tortfeasor against whom the plaintiff is prohibited from recovering (such as plaintiff's employer in

192-673: A Court of Record. Courts of record are loosely defined in English law . They have been defined as: As such, the following may be defined as courts of record: Under an alternative definition, courts or tribunals may be designated by statute as "courts of record" irrespective of any of the three above criteria, such as the County Court under section 1A of the County Courts Act 1984 or the First-Tier Tribunal pursuant to section 3 of

256-427: A Social Security claims examiner or a patent examiner. Then, the agency provides a first-level of intra-agency review before a board of appeals that conducts its proceedings on a more formal basis than the proceedings before the initial hearing officer. In most cases, the first level appeal is " trial de novo " (or a 'hearing de novo' ). The intra-agency appeal may be of record or not or somewhere between, depending on

320-459: A bond and pay a writ tax in the GDC within 30 days of the judgment, or within 10 days of the judgment if the case is one of unlawful detainer. Court of record A court of record is a trial court or appellate court in which a record of the proceedings is captured and preserved, for the possibility of appeal . A court clerk or a court reporter takes down a record of oral proceedings. That written record (and all other evidence)

384-411: A case would no longer have to read the entire case file from scratch, but could (in theory) look only at the most recent version of the complaint filed by the plaintiff, the defendant's most recent answer to that complaint, and any court orders on demurrers to either pleading. Code pleading was criticized because many lawyers felt that it was too difficult to fully research all the facts needed to bring

448-602: A complaint before one had even initiated the action, and thus meritorious plaintiffs could not bring their complaints in time before the statute of limitations expired. Code pleading has also been criticized as promoting "hypertechnical reading of legal papers". Notice pleading is the dominant form of pleading used in the United States today. In 1938, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were adopted to govern civil procedure in United States federal courts . One goal of

512-442: A complaint "must assert a legally recognized cause of action and it must plead facts which bring the particular case within that cause of action." In alternative pleading , legal fiction is employed to permit a party to argue two mutually exclusive possibilities, for example, submitting an injury complaint alleging that the harm to the plaintiff caused by the defendant was so outrageous that it must have either been intended as

576-400: A license to practice law before the specific tribunal). In contrast, in courts not of record , oral proceedings are not recorded, and the judge makes his or her decision based on notes and memory. In most "not of record" proceedings, the parties may appear personally, without lawyers. For example, most small claims courts , traffic courts , justice courts presided over by justices of

640-565: A malicious attack or, if not, must have been due to gross negligence. The use of "pleaded" versus "pled" as the past tense version of "pleading" has been a subject of controversy among many of those that practice law. "Pled" is almost never used in Australian publications, while being somewhat common in American, British, and Canadian publications. In a 2010 search of the Westlaw legal database , "pled"

704-437: A negligent injury case, which would be covered by the state's workman's compensation ). Virginia law does not recognize the doctrine of necessary and indispensable parties , so the inability to implead a party will not affect the court's jurisdiction over the case. The GDC can also entertain interpleader causes of action, allowing a party holding something of value to force all competing claimants to litigate which of them has

SECTION 10

#1732845546096

768-484: A party to a pending case can not do so except on a motion of an existing party to the case. There is virtually no pretrial discovery available at the GDC level. However, a witness may be compelled to appear at the trial itself through a subpoena , and may be required to bring documents through a subpoena duces tecum . The party seeking to subpoena a witness must file a request for subpoena at least 15 days before trial, or else they will have to show "good cause" for why

832-495: A spectrum, and there is a transition zone between them. Many proceedings have an intermediate character, with some "of record" characteristics but not others. For example, in some agencies of the U.S. government, oral arguments in intra-agency appeals are transcribed by a reporter as a matter of the agency's choice, but since the record is not required by statute, other guarantees of 5 U.S.C. §§ 554, 556, and 557 do not apply. For example, in proceedings before executive branch agencies of

896-451: A statement of damages claimed (an ad quod damnum clause). In some situations, a complaint is called a petition , in which case the party filing it is called the petitioner and the other party is the respondent . In equity, sometimes called chancery, the initial pleading may be called either a petition or a bill of complaint in chancery . In England and Wales, the first pleading is a Claim Form, issued under either Part 7 or Part 8 of

960-416: A subpoena should issue. As there are no juries in the GDC, trial is relatively fast and informal. Evidence is presented by oral testimony of witnesses, although personal injury damages may be proved by written records from a hospital or health care provider. If a written medical report by a health care provider is introduced, the party seeking to introduce it must notify the other party at least 10 days before

1024-401: A transcript of any trial , and it may include an audio or videotape of hearings, appearances, or arguments of motions . Exhibits introduced in evidence are maintained in the court record at least for a certain period of time after the case has been tried, when the evidence may be returned to the parties or destroyed. If either party takes an appeal, the lower court produces a copy certified by

1088-698: A unique seal to authenticate the formal record. Pleadings In law as practiced in countries that follow the English models, a pleading is a formal written statement of one party's claims or defenses in response to another party's complaint(s) in a civil action . The parties' pleadings in a case define the issues to be adjudicated in the action. The Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) govern pleading in England and Wales . Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern pleading in United States federal courts . Each state in

1152-408: Is a pleading filed by a defendant which admits or denies the specific allegations set forth in a complaint and constitutes a general appearance by a defendant. In England and Wales, the equivalent pleading is called a Defence. A defendant may also file a cross-complaint against another defendant named by the plaintiff and may also file a third-party complaint bring other parties into a case by

1216-407: Is a remnant of this period. In its final form in the 19th century, common law pleading was terribly complex and slow by modern standards. The parties would normally go through several rounds of pleadings before the parties were deemed to have clearly stated their controversy, so that the case was "at issue" and could proceed to trial. A case would begin with a complaint in which the plaintiff alleged

1280-407: Is effected. If the defendant feels that the plaintiff has not provided enough information about the cause of action, he may file a motion for a "bill of particulars", and if the court grants such a motion then the plaintiff will be ordered to provide the requested details. If the cause of action is premised on a written instrument such as a contract or a deed, the original document must be provided to

1344-414: Is often possible to go to a court to seek judicial review of the judgment of the agency. The primary function of the record is to serve as the basis for appellate review of the agency- or trial-level proceedings. The record from a trial court includes the evidence introduced by the parties and some form of record of the proceeding itself, which includes copies of all papers filed by the parties and

SECTION 20

#1732845546096

1408-427: Is only meaningful if the trial-level court kept a record of its proceedings. In some classes of cases, after a determination by an inferior or lower tribunal not of record, a party may take a first-level appeal to a tribunal that is of record. For example, many government administrative agencies delegate initial decisions to a single person who acts informally, typically with a title like "clerk" or "examiner," such as

1472-435: Is only necessary to plead the facts that give rise to a cause of action. It is not necessary even for the petitioner to identify the cause of action being pleaded. However, mere conclusory allegations such as "the defendant was negligent" are not, by themselves, sufficient to sustain a cause of action. Other states, including Connecticut and New Jersey, are also fact-pleading jurisdictions. Illinois , for example, requires that

1536-499: Is preserved at least long enough for all appeals to be exhausted, or for some further period of time provided by law (for example, in some U.S. states , death penalty statutes provide that all evidence must be preserved for an extended period of time). Most courts of record have rules of procedure (see rules of evidence , rules of civil procedure , and rules of criminal procedure ) and therefore they require that most parties be represented by counsel (specifically, attorneys holding

1600-483: Is specified in the contract. Within these limitations, the GDC can hear cases in tort or contract , and actions in detinue seeking the return of wrongfully held personal property . In determining whether the amount involved falls within the amount in controversy requirement, interest payments and attorney's fees contracted for in a written instrument. In cases involving unlawful detainer of real estate used for business , commercial , or agricultural purposes,

1664-452: The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure was to relax the strict rules of code pleading. However, each state also has its own rules of civil procedure, which may require different, looser, or stricter rules in state court . Louisiana , a state that derives its legal tradition from the Spanish and French civil law (as opposed to English common law ), employs a system of fact pleading wherein it

1728-466: The probate of wills , which are directed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Circuit Courts. The only injunctive relief that the GDC may grant is in enforcing the state's Freedom of Information Act . The GDC must also be able to exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant, which may be premised on the defendant's physical presence in the jurisdiction, or on the occurrence of some element of

1792-458: The Circuit Court brought about by an appeal from the defendant, the plaintiff may seek leave to amend to increase the claim to an amount in excess of the $ 25,000 limitation of the GDC. To appeal a case from the GDC to the Circuit Court, a notice of appeal must be filed with the clerk of the GDC within 10 days after a judgment or conviction has been entered by the GDC. The appellant must then post

1856-422: The Circuit Court, although the decisions of the Circuit Court are subject to further appellate review. In determining whether the matter exceeds $ 50, the Circuit Court looks to the recovery achieved by the plaintiff. If, for example, the plaintiff seeks $ 3,000 and recovers $ 2,960, the plaintiff will have no right to appeal, but the defendant will (having been assessed a judgment well in excess of $ 50). On retrial in

1920-521: The Civil Procedure Rules, which sets out the nature of the action and the relief sought, and may give brief particulars of the claim. The Claimant also has the option, under Practice Direction 7A.61 to serve Particulars of Claim (a document setting out the allegations which found the cause of action) within 14 days of the issue of the Claim Form. When used in civil proceedings in England and Wales,

1984-474: The GDC is narrow, both with respect to civil cases and criminal cases. With respect to civil claims, it has sole authority to try cases involving amounts of $ 4,500 or less. It shares authority with the Virginia Circuit Court to try cases involving sums between $ 4,500 and $ 25,000. The amount in controversy is determined without considering interest or attorney's fees , even if recovery of these costs

Virginia General District Court - Misplaced Pages Continue

2048-444: The GDC may hear cases involving claims of rent owed and property damage without limitation. If the real estate is used for residential purposes, then the $ 25,000 limit applies. The maximum jurisdictional limits do not apply to any claim, counter-claim or cross-claim in an unlawful detainer action that includes a claim for damages or rent against any person obligated on a residential lease. The GDC may issue distress warrants establishing

2112-411: The GDC. If the case is a criminal case or traffic infraction, the appellant will automatically receive a jury trial in the Circuit Court unless they affirmatively waive this right. For civil cases on appeal, the appellant must request a jury; if no such request is made, then the appeal will be heard by a Circuit Court judge alone. Cases heard in the GDC may not be directly appealed to any court other than

2176-781: The Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. Using a broader definition, the majority of courts in the UK keep records of proceedings. This includes the county court and most independent tribunals, e.g. the Investigatory Powers Tribunal . Courts of record are not defined in Scots law. However, both the High Court of Justiciary and Court of Session keep record of all proceedings and as such may be generally termed courts of record. "Of record" and "not of record" are two polar extremes of

2240-400: The U.S. federal government, fully-formal proceedings of record are governed by the "formal adjudication" or "on the record" provisions of §§ 554, 556, and 557, but informal proceedings or "not on the record" proceedings are governed by § 555. However, powers available to the tribunal turn on the tribunal having full "of record" characteristics. For example, in many states, statutes provide that

2304-410: The United States has its own statutes and rules that govern pleading in the courts of that state. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure a complaint is the first pleading in American law filed by a plaintiff which initiates a lawsuit. A complaint sets forth the relevant allegations of fact that give rise to one or more legal causes of action along with a prayer for relief and sometimes

2368-524: The action arose. GDC proceedings are relatively informal. It is not necessary to file formal pleadings . Rather, a plaintiff can fill out and serve the defendant with a "civil warrant", which is a form provided by the Clerk of the Court containing blanks to be filled in identifying the parties and the cause of action. Alternatively, the plaintiff can draft his own "notice of motion for judgment". The notice provided to

2432-525: The action without prejudice to the other side's right to bring the claims in another action or another court. A peremptory plea had only one kind: a plea in bar. A party making a plea in bar could either traverse the other side's pleading (i.e., deny all or some of the facts pleaded) or confess and avoid it (i.e., admit the facts pleaded but plead new ones that would dispel their effect). A traverse could be general (deny everything) or specific. Either side could plead imparlance in order to get more time to plead on

2496-399: The agency. That is not an appeal as such but a new proceeding, which completely supersedes the result of the prior agency determination. Often, the review tribunal will not permit introduction of new evidence, or may have evidentiary rules that are quite restrictive. When the first-level adjudication is made by an executive branch agency, and after all intra-agency procedures are exhausted, it

2560-407: The case if the defendant successfully demurred to the complaint on the basis that it merely stated "legal conclusions" or "evidentiary facts." Code pleading also drastically shortened the pleading process. Most of the old common law pleadings were abolished. From now on, a case required only a complaint and an answer, with an optional cross-complaint and cross-answer, and with the demurrer kept as

2624-506: The cause of action in the jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction is predicated on Virginia's long-arm statute , which generally permits Virginia courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over a party that resides in Virginia, or transacts substantial business in Virginia, or who caused an actionable injury in Virginia. A party may waive a lack of personal jurisdiction, but may also appear in court to contest personal jurisdiction without thereby waiving

Virginia General District Court - Misplaced Pages Continue

2688-418: The court must rule on the motion during the 21-day period. Appeals from the GDC for civil matters in excess of $ 50, and for all criminal and traffic cases, go to the Virginia Circuit Court , where they are re-tried de novo (because the GDC does not generate a record to be reviewed for error). The appellant in the Circuit Court will then be entitled to a jury trial , even if they were not entitled to one in

2752-410: The court, and the defendant may use a motion for a bill of particulars to compel the production of this document as well. The plaintiff, on the other hand, may file a motion for "grounds of defense", which, if granted, will result in an order requiring the defendant to submit a written response indicating the defenses that it intends to assert. If the plaintiff fails to respond to a bill of particulars, or

2816-409: The defendant fails to provide requested grounds of defense, the court may enter summary judgment against the non-responsive party. A defendant may also file a counterclaim against the plaintiff, or a cross-claim against a co-defendant, at any point before the trial begins, so long as the amount is within the jurisdictional limits of the GDC. Failure to file a counterclaim, however, does not effect

2880-412: The defendant must instruct the defendant of several things. It must explain how the trial date will be set; it must inform the defendant that failure to appear and contest the claim can result in a default being entered; and, under something of a quirk of Virginia law, it must tell the defendant how they may object to venue . The defendant need not file an answer at all, but can simply show up in court on

2944-399: The designated "return date" and contest the claim. The civil warrant may be served on the defendant by the sheriff or deputy of the county in which the defendant resides, unless the plaintiff opts to have service of process effected by an officer of the court. The return date is the date on which the defendant must appear in court, and can be anywhere from 5 to 60 days after service of process

3008-401: The established forms of action. Lawyers had to engage in great ingenuity to shoehorn their clients' claims into existing forms of action. The result was that at common law, pleadings were stuffed full of awkward legal fictions that had little to do with the actual "real-world" facts of the case. The placeholder name John Doe (still commonly used in American pleading to name unknown parties)

3072-442: The evolution of the common law writ system). The emphasis was on procedure over substance. Law and equity evolved as separate judicial systems, each with its own procedures and remedies. Because the types of claims eligible for consideration was capped early during the development of the English legal system, claims that might have been acceptable to the courts' evolving sense of justice often did not match up perfectly with any of

3136-426: The facts entitling him to relief, then the defendant would file any one of a variety of pleas as an answer, followed by a replication from the plaintiff, a rejoinder from the defendant, a surrejoinder from the plaintiff, a rebutter from the defendant, and a surrebutter from the plaintiff. At each stage, a party could file a demurrer to the other's pleading (essentially a request that the court immediately rule on whether

3200-435: The issue. In terms of venue , where personal jurisdiction lies in multiple districts, the appropriate venue for the case to be heard is set forth by Virginia statutes, which divides possible venues as "Category A" (preferred) and "Category B" (permissible), and requires that Category B venue may only be used where no Category A venue is available. For example, in a dispute over the ownership of land, Category A venue lies where

3264-425: The land is located. Most Category A venue provisions of the Virginia statutes are inapplicable to the GDC, which does not have subject matter jurisdiction over divorce and probate matters, and can not issue injunctions. In the types of cases that can be heard in the GDC, venue is generally deemed objectionable if it is not where the defendant resides or has a registered office or registered agent, or where some part of

SECTION 50

#1732845546096

3328-432: The merits. Once the case was at issue, the defendant could reopen the pleadings in order to plead a newly discovered defense (and start the whole sequence again) by filing a plea puis darrein. The result of all this complexity was that to ascertain what was "at issue" in a case, a stranger to the case (i.e., such as a newly appointed judge) would have to sift through a huge pile of pleadings to figure out what had happened to

3392-531: The original averments of the complaint and whether there was anything left to be actually adjudicated by the court. Code pleading was first introduced in 1850 in New York and in 1851 in California , and eventually spread to 26 other states. Code pleading sought to abolish the distinction between law and equity. It unified civil procedure for all types of actions as much as possible. The focus shifted from pleading

3456-459: The party must plead on the merits in response. Since the demurrer procedure required an immediate ruling as does a motion, many common law jurisdictions therefore narrowed the concept of pleadings to be framing the issues in a case. Pleadings are not motions in and of themselves, and courts replaced the demurrer mechanism with the motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action or the application to strike out particulars of claim. An answer

3520-463: The peace , many administrative tribunals that make initial governmental administrative decisions such as government benefit determinations, and the like, are not courts of record. The Constitution of India , under Article 129 states that the Supreme Court of India shall be a Court of record with powers to punish for contempt of itself. Similarly, Art 215 declares all High Courts of India to be

3584-409: The pleading was legally adequate before they had to file a pleading in response) or simply file another pleading in response. Generally, a plea could be dilatory or peremptory. There were three kinds of dilatory plea: to the jurisdiction, in suspension, or in abatement. The first challenged the court's jurisdiction, the second asked the court to stay the action, and the third asked the court to dismiss

3648-422: The power to fine or imprison lies only with courts of record. Similarly, for a court to punish for contempt, there must be a record of exactly what was said by whom and so the power to punish for contempt requires the tribunal have at least a court reporter taking down all proceedings. The rationale is that criminal penalties or contempt penalties may not be imposed unless there is a right of appeal, and an appeal

3712-452: The process of impleader . A defendant may file a counter-claim to raise a cause of action to defend, reduce or set off the claim of the plaintiff . Common law pleading was the system of civil procedure used in England, which early on developed a strong emphasis on the form of action rather than the cause of action (as a result of the Provisions of Oxford , which severely limited

3776-549: The right form of action (that is, the right procedure) to pleading the right cause of action (that is, a substantive right to be enforced by the law). Code pleading stripped out most of the legal fictions that had encrusted common law pleading by requiring parties to plead "ultimate facts." This means that to plead a cause of action, the pleader has to plead each element and also allege specific facts which, if proven with evidence at trial, would constitute proof of that element. Failure to provide such detail could lead to dismissal of

3840-479: The rights of a creditor to seize property, again without limit as to the amount. Conversely, the GDC may order the attachment of personal property valued up to $ 25,000, but has no authority to order the attachment of real estate, no matter how low the value. With respect to criminal cases, the GDC may only try misdemeanors . The GDC also has no authority over domestic relations matters such as divorce , annulment , and child custody , nor does it have authority over

3904-401: The standard attack on improper pleadings. Instead of piling layers and layers of pleadings and averments on top of each other, a pleading that was attacked by demurrer would either be completely superseded by an amended pleading or would proceed immediately "at issue" as to the validly pleaded parts. This meant that to determine what the parties were currently fighting about, a stranger to

SECTION 60

#1732845546096

3968-409: The superior claim. As with other causes of action, the jurisdictional limitations must be met. It must be remembered that the GDC has no injunctive power; while the Circuit Courts can issue injunctions prohibiting parties from litigating the interpleader claim in other forums, the GDC can not prevent this. Finally, there is no right of intervention in GDC proceedings; a third party that wishes to become

4032-399: The term "complaint" refers to the mechanism by which civil proceedings are instituted in the magistrates' court and may be either written or oral. A demurrer is a pleading (usually filed by a defendant ) which objects to the legal sufficiency of the opponent's pleading (usually a complaint) and demands that the court rule immediately about whether the pleading is legally adequate before

4096-412: The trial. The health care provider must swear out a statement affirming that they treated this patient and attesting that the report fully describes the injury, and is true and accurate as to the description of the injury and any statement of costs. A party seeking a rehearing of a judgment must file the motion requesting this relief within 21 days of entry of the judgment. The cases are divided on whether

#95904