Misplaced Pages

#689310

84-545: The Uppsala Schmidt Telescope is a Schmidt telescope located in Australia. It was moved to Siding Spring Observatory from Mount Stromlo Observatory in 1982. The instrument has been used to study galaxies, asteroids and comets. It was last dedicated to the Siding Spring Survey . The telescope had a field of view of just over 6° through the use of a correcting plate , making its field three times as large as that of

168-532: A sin ⁡ θ ) k a sin ⁡ θ ) 2 , {\displaystyle I(\theta )=I_{0}\left({\frac {2J_{1}(ka\sin \theta )}{ka\sin \theta }}\right)^{2},} where a {\displaystyle a} is the radius of the circular aperture, k {\displaystyle k} is equal to 2 π / λ {\displaystyle 2\pi /\lambda } and J 1 {\displaystyle J_{1}}

252-422: A Schmidt corrector plate , located at the center of curvature of the primary mirror. The film or other detector is placed inside the camera, at the prime focus. The design is noted for allowing very fast focal ratios , while controlling coma and astigmatism . Schmidt cameras have very strongly curved focal planes , thus requiring that the film, plate, or other detector be correspondingly curved. In some cases

336-477: A fundamental limit to the resolution of a camera, telescope, or microscope. Other examples of diffraction are considered below. A long slit of infinitesimal width which is illuminated by light diffracts the light into a series of circular waves and the wavefront which emerges from the slit is a cylindrical wave of uniform intensity, in accordance with the Huygens–Fresnel principle . An illuminated slit that

420-425: A bright light source like the sun or the moon. At the opposite point one may also observe glory - bright rings around the shadow of the observer. In contrast to the corona, glory requires the particles to be transparent spheres (like fog droplets), since the backscattering of the light that forms the glory involves refraction and internal reflection within the droplet. A shadow of a solid object, using light from

504-435: A compact source, shows small fringes near its edges. Diffraction spikes are diffraction patterns caused due to non-circular aperture in camera or support struts in telescope; In normal vision, diffraction through eyelashes may produce such spikes. The speckle pattern which is observed when laser light falls on an optically rough surface is also a diffraction phenomenon. When deli meat appears to be iridescent , that

588-403: A curve for telescopes of focal ratio f/2.5 or faster. Also, for fast focal ratios, the curve obtained is not sufficiently exact and requires additional hand correction. A third method, invented in 1970 for Celestron by Tom Johnson and John O'rourke, uses a vacuum pan with the correct shape of the curve pre-shaped into the bottom of the pan, called a "master block". The upper exposed surface

672-546: A design was used to construct a working 1/8-scale model of the Palomar Schmidt, with a 5° field. The retronym "lensless Schmidt" has been given to this configuration. Yrjö Väisälä originally designed an "astronomical camera" similar to Bernhard Schmidt's "Schmidt camera", but the design was unpublished. Väisälä did mention it in lecture notes in 1924 with a footnote: "problematic spherical focal plane". Once Väisälä saw Schmidt's publication, he promptly went ahead and solved

756-494: A multiple axis mount allowing it to follow satellites in the sky – were used by the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory to track artificial satellites from June 1958 until the mid-1970s. The Mersenne–Schmidt camera consists of a concave paraboloidal primary mirror, a convex spherical secondary mirror, and a concave spherical tertiary mirror. The first two mirrors (a Mersenne configuration) perform

840-486: A point source (the Helmholtz equation ), ∇ 2 ψ + k 2 ψ = δ ( r ) , {\displaystyle \nabla ^{2}\psi +k^{2}\psi =\delta (\mathbf {r} ),} where δ ( r ) {\displaystyle \delta (\mathbf {r} )} is the 3-dimensional delta function. The delta function has only radial dependence, so

924-457: A propagating wavefront as a collection of individual spherical wavelets . The characteristic bending pattern is most pronounced when a wave from a coherent source (such as a laser) encounters a slit/aperture that is comparable in size to its wavelength , as shown in the inserted image. This is due to the addition, or interference , of different points on the wavefront (or, equivalently, each wavelet) that travel by paths of different lengths to

SECTION 10

#1732858415690

1008-406: A pure Schmidt camera and just behind the prime focus for a Schmidt–Cassegrain . The Schmidt corrector is thicker in the middle and the edge. This corrects the light paths so light reflected from the outer part of the mirror and light reflected from the inner portion of the mirror is brought to the same common focus " F ". The Schmidt corrector only corrects for spherical aberration. It does not change

1092-406: A second convex lens whose focal point is coincident with that of the first lens. The resulting beam has a larger diameter, and hence a lower divergence. Divergence of a laser beam may be reduced below the diffraction of a Gaussian beam or even reversed to convergence if the refractive index of the propagation media increases with the light intensity. This may result in a self-focusing effect. When

1176-466: A series of maxima and minima. In the modern quantum mechanical understanding of light propagation through a slit (or slits) every photon is described by its wavefunction that determines the probability distribution for the photon: the light and dark bands are the areas where the photons are more or less likely to be detected. The wavefunction is determined by the physical surroundings such as slit geometry, screen distance, and initial conditions when

1260-408: Is θ ≈ sin ⁡ θ = 1.22 λ D , {\displaystyle \theta \approx \sin \theta =1.22{\frac {\lambda }{D}},} where D {\displaystyle D} is the diameter of the entrance pupil of the imaging lens (e.g., of a telescope's main mirror). Two point sources will each produce an Airy pattern – see

1344-417: Is a Bessel function . The smaller the aperture, the larger the spot size at a given distance, and the greater the divergence of the diffracted beams. The wave that emerges from a point source has amplitude ψ {\displaystyle \psi } at location r {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} } that is given by the solution of the frequency domain wave equation for

1428-513: Is already the case; water waves propagate only on the surface of the water. For light, we can often neglect one direction if the diffracting object extends in that direction over a distance far greater than the wavelength. In the case of light shining through small circular holes, we will have to take into account the full three-dimensional nature of the problem. The effects of diffraction are often seen in everyday life. The most striking examples of diffraction are those that involve light; for example,

1512-708: Is also a Schmidt camera. The Schmidt telescope of the Karl Schwarzschild Observatory is the largest Schmidt camera of the world. A Schmidt telescope was at the heart of the Hipparcos (1989–1993) satellite from the European Space Agency . This was used in the Hipparcos Survey which mapped the distances of more than a million stars with unprecedented accuracy: it included 99% of all stars up to magnitude 11. The spherical mirror used in this telescope

1596-661: Is an integer other than zero. There is no such simple argument to enable us to find the maxima of the diffraction pattern. The intensity profile can be calculated using the Fraunhofer diffraction equation as I ( θ ) = I 0 sinc 2 ⁡ ( d π λ sin ⁡ θ ) , {\displaystyle I(\theta )=I_{0}\,\operatorname {sinc} ^{2}\left({\frac {d\pi }{\lambda }}\sin \theta \right),} where I ( θ ) {\displaystyle I(\theta )}

1680-427: Is diffraction off the meat fibers. All these effects are a consequence of the fact that light propagates as a wave . Diffraction can occur with any kind of wave. Ocean waves diffract around jetties and other obstacles. Sound waves can diffract around objects, which is why one can still hear someone calling even when hiding behind a tree. Diffraction can also be a concern in some technical applications; it sets

1764-544: Is half the width of the slit. The path difference is approximately d sin ⁡ ( θ ) 2 {\displaystyle {\frac {d\sin(\theta )}{2}}} so that the minimum intensity occurs at an angle θ min {\displaystyle \theta _{\text{min}}} given by d sin ⁡ θ min = λ , {\displaystyle d\,\sin \theta _{\text{min}}=\lambda ,} where d {\displaystyle d}

SECTION 20

#1732858415690

1848-784: Is incident on the aperture, the field produced by this aperture distribution is given by the surface integral Ψ ( r ) ∝ ∬ a p e r t u r e E i n c ( x ′ , y ′ )   e i k | r − r ′ | 4 π | r − r ′ | d x ′ d y ′ , {\displaystyle \Psi (r)\propto \iint \limits _{\mathrm {aperture} }\!\!E_{\mathrm {inc} }(x',y')~{\frac {e^{ik|\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '|}}{4\pi |\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '|}}\,dx'\,dy',} where

1932-487: Is measurable at subatomic to molecular levels). The amount of diffraction depends on the size of the gap. Diffraction is greatest when the size of the gap is similar to the wavelength of the wave. In this case, when the waves pass through the gap they become semi-circular . Da Vinci might have observed diffraction in a broadening of the shadow. The effects of diffraction of light were first carefully observed and characterized by Francesco Maria Grimaldi , who also coined

2016-444: Is possible to obtain a qualitative understanding of many diffraction phenomena by considering how the relative phases of the individual secondary wave sources vary, and, in particular, the conditions in which the phase difference equals half a cycle in which case waves will cancel one another out. The simplest descriptions of diffraction are those in which the situation can be reduced to a two-dimensional problem. For water waves , this

2100-415: Is the unnormalized sinc function . This analysis applies only to the far field ( Fraunhofer diffraction ), that is, at a distance much larger than the width of the slit. From the intensity profile above, if d ≪ λ {\displaystyle d\ll \lambda } , the intensity will have little dependency on θ {\displaystyle \theta } , hence

2184-428: Is the angle at which the light is incident, d {\displaystyle d} is the separation of grating elements, and m {\displaystyle m} is an integer which can be positive or negative. The light diffracted by a grating is found by summing the light diffracted from each of the elements, and is essentially a convolution of diffraction and interference patterns. The figure shows

2268-746: Is the intensity at a given angle, I 0 {\displaystyle I_{0}} is the intensity at the central maximum ( θ = 0 {\displaystyle \theta =0} ), which is also a normalization factor of the intensity profile that can be determined by an integration from θ = − π 2 {\textstyle \theta =-{\frac {\pi }{2}}} to θ = π 2 {\textstyle \theta ={\frac {\pi }{2}}} and conservation of energy, and sinc ⁡ x = sin ⁡ x x {\displaystyle \operatorname {sinc} x={\frac {\sin x}{x}}} , which

2352-431: Is the wavelength of the light and N {\displaystyle N} is the f-number (focal length f {\displaystyle f} divided by aperture diameter D {\displaystyle D} ) of the imaging optics; this is strictly accurate for N ≫ 1 {\displaystyle N\gg 1} ( paraxial case). In object space, the corresponding angular resolution

2436-705: Is the width of the slit, θ min {\displaystyle \theta _{\text{min}}} is the angle of incidence at which the minimum intensity occurs, and λ {\displaystyle \lambda } is the wavelength of the light. A similar argument can be used to show that if we imagine the slit to be divided into four, six, eight parts, etc., minima are obtained at angles θ n {\displaystyle \theta _{n}} given by d sin ⁡ θ n = n λ , {\displaystyle d\,\sin \theta _{n}=n\lambda ,} where n {\displaystyle n}

2520-545: Is then polished flat creating a corrector with the correct shape once the vacuum is released. This removes the need to have to hold a shape by applying an exact vacuum and allows for the mass production of corrector plates of the same exact shape. The technical difficulties associated with the production of Schmidt corrector plates led some designers, such as Dmitri Dmitrievich Maksutov and Albert Bouwers , to come up with alternative designs using more conventional meniscus corrector lenses. Because of its wide field of view,

2604-404: Is wider than a wavelength produces interference effects in the space downstream of the slit. Assuming that the slit behaves as though it has a large number of point sources spaced evenly across the width of the slit interference effects can be calculated. The analysis of this system is simplified if we consider light of a single wavelength. If the incident light is coherent , these sources all have

Uppsala Southern Schmidt Telescope - Misplaced Pages Continue

2688-600: The Anglo-Australian Telescope . It used a spherical rather than a parabolic mirror with 0.6 m correcting plate to achieve this. Photographic plates and film were used as detectors. The Uppsala Schmidt Telescope was built in 1956 in Sweden. The telescope was originally located at the Mount Stromlo Observatory . It was operational there between 1957 and 1982. It took the first images ever recorded of

2772-510: The Laplace operator (a.k.a. scalar Laplacian) in the spherical coordinate system simplifies to ∇ 2 ψ = 1 r ∂ 2 ∂ r 2 ( r ψ ) . {\displaystyle \nabla ^{2}\psi ={\frac {1}{r}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial r^{2}}}(r\psi ).} (See del in cylindrical and spherical coordinates .) By direct substitution,

2856-525: The Sputnik satellite in 1957. The telescope was modernised in 2000 and 2001 to include the experimental use of Charge-coupled devices (CCDs) which are 40 times more sensitive than standard photography. The Uppsala Schmidt telescope was the instrument used by the Siding Spring Survey to conduct the only professional search for dangerous asteroids being made in the Southern Hemisphere . The telescope

2940-739: The UK Schmidt Telescope and the ESO Schmidt; these provided the major source of all-sky photographic imaging from 1950 until 2000, when electronic detectors took over. A recent example is the Kepler space telescope exoplanet finder. Other related designs are the Wright camera and Lurie–Houghton telescope . The Schmidt camera was invented by Estonian-German optician Bernhard Schmidt in 1930. Its optical components are an easy-to-make spherical primary mirror , and an aspherical correcting lens , known as

3024-536: The spherical aberration introduced by the spherical primary mirror of the Schmidt or Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope designs. It was invented by Bernhard Schmidt in 1931, although it may have been independently invented by Finnish astronomer Yrjö Väisälä in 1924 (sometimes called the Schmidt–Väisälä camera as a result). Schmidt originally introduced it as part of a wide-field photographic catadioptric telescope ,

3108-776: The Fraunhofer region field of the planar aperture assumes the form of a Fourier transform Ψ ( r ) ∝ e i k r 4 π r ∬ a p e r t u r e E i n c ( x ′ , y ′ ) e − i ( k x x ′ + k y y ′ ) d x ′ d y ′ , {\displaystyle \Psi (r)\propto {\frac {e^{ikr}}{4\pi r}}\iint \limits _{\mathrm {aperture} }\!\!E_{\mathrm {inc} }(x',y')e^{-i(k_{x}x'+k_{y}y')}\,dx'\,dy',} In

3192-634: The Schmidt camera is typically used as a survey instrument, for research programs in which a large amount of sky must be covered. These include astronomical surveys , comet and asteroid searches, and nova patrols. In addition, Schmidt cameras and derivative designs are frequently used for tracking artificial Earth satellites . The first relatively large Schmidt telescopes were built at Hamburg Observatory and Palomar Observatory shortly before World War II . Between 1945 and 1980, about eight more large (1 meter or larger) Schmidt telescopes were built around

3276-405: The Schmidt camera. It is now used in several other telescope designs, camera lenses and image projection systems that utilise a spherical primary mirror. Schmidt corrector plates work because they are aspheric lenses with spherical aberration that is equal to but opposite of the spherical primary mirrors they are placed in front of. They are placed at the center of curvature " C " of the mirrors for

3360-444: The Schmidt design directing light through a hole in the primary mirror creates a Schmidt–Cassegrain telescope . The last two designs are popular with telescope manufacturers because they are compact and use simple spherical optics. A short list of notable and/or large aperture Schmidt cameras. Diffraction Diffraction is the interference or bending of waves around the corners of an obstacle or through an aperture into

3444-680: The UK Science Research Council with a 1.2 meter Schmidt telescope at Siding Spring Observatory engaged in a collaborative sky survey to complement the first Palomar Sky Survey, but focusing on the southern hemisphere. The technical improvements developed during this survey encouraged the development of the Second Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS II). The telescope used in the Lowell Observatory Near-Earth-Object Search (LONEOS)

Uppsala Southern Schmidt Telescope - Misplaced Pages Continue

3528-1472: The adjacent figure. The expression for the far-zone (Fraunhofer region) field becomes Ψ ( r ) ∝ e i k r 4 π r ∬ a p e r t u r e E i n c ( x ′ , y ′ ) e − i k ( r ′ ⋅ r ^ ) d x ′ d y ′ . {\displaystyle \Psi (r)\propto {\frac {e^{ikr}}{4\pi r}}\iint \limits _{\mathrm {aperture} }\!\!E_{\mathrm {inc} }(x',y')e^{-ik(\mathbf {r} '\cdot \mathbf {\hat {r}} )}\,dx'\,dy'.} Now, since r ′ = x ′ x ^ + y ′ y ^ {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} '=x'\mathbf {\hat {x}} +y'\mathbf {\hat {y}} } and r ^ = sin ⁡ θ cos ⁡ ϕ x ^ + sin ⁡ θ   sin ⁡ ϕ   y ^ + cos ⁡ θ z ^ , {\displaystyle \mathbf {\hat {r}} =\sin \theta \cos \phi \mathbf {\hat {x}} +\sin \theta ~\sin \phi ~\mathbf {\hat {y}} +\cos \theta \mathbf {\hat {z}} ,}

3612-442: The beam profile of a laser beam changes as it propagates is determined by diffraction. When the entire emitted beam has a planar, spatially coherent wave front, it approximates Gaussian beam profile and has the lowest divergence for a given diameter. The smaller the output beam, the quicker it diverges. It is possible to reduce the divergence of a laser beam by first expanding it with one convex lens , and then collimating it with

3696-422: The closely spaced tracks on a CD or DVD act as a diffraction grating to form the familiar rainbow pattern seen when looking at a disc. This principle can be extended to engineer a grating with a structure such that it will produce any diffraction pattern desired; the hologram on a credit card is an example. Diffraction in the atmosphere by small particles can cause a corona - a bright disc and rings around

3780-409: The corrector. Schmidt himself worked out a second, more elegant, scheme for producing the complex figure needed for the correcting plate. A thin glass disk with a perfectly polished accurate flat surface on both sides was placed on a heavy rigid metal pan. The top surface of the pan around the edge of the glass disk was ground at a precise angle or bevel based on the coefficient of elasticity of

3864-759: The definition of the incident angle θ i {\displaystyle \theta _{\text{i}}} . A diffraction grating is an optical component with a regular pattern. The form of the light diffracted by a grating depends on the structure of the elements and the number of elements present, but all gratings have intensity maxima at angles θ m which are given by the grating equation d ( sin ⁡ θ m ± sin ⁡ θ i ) = m λ , {\displaystyle d\left(\sin {\theta _{m}}\pm \sin {\theta _{i}}\right)=m\lambda ,} where θ i {\displaystyle \theta _{i}}

3948-958: The delta function source is located at the origin. If the source is located at an arbitrary source point, denoted by the vector r ′ {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} '} and the field point is located at the point r {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} } , then we may represent the scalar Green's function (for arbitrary source location) as ψ ( r | r ′ ) = e i k | r − r ′ | 4 π | r − r ′ | . {\displaystyle \psi (\mathbf {r} |\mathbf {r} ')={\frac {e^{ik|\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '|}}{4\pi |\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '|}}.} Therefore, if an electric field E i n c ( x , y ) {\displaystyle E_{\mathrm {inc} }(x,y)}

4032-402: The detector is made curved; in others flat media is mechanically conformed to the shape of the focal plane through the use of retaining clips or bolts, or by the application of a vacuum . A field flattener , in its simplest form a planoconvex lens in front of the film plate or detector, is sometimes used. Since the corrector plate is at the center of curvature of the primary mirror in this design

4116-693: The diffracted field to be calculated, including the Kirchhoff diffraction equation (derived from the wave equation ), the Fraunhofer diffraction approximation of the Kirchhoff equation (applicable to the far field ), the Fresnel diffraction approximation (applicable to the near field ) and the Feynman path integral formulation . Most configurations cannot be solved analytically, but can yield numerical solutions through finite element and boundary element methods. It

4200-1138: The expression for the Fraunhofer region field from a planar aperture now becomes Ψ ( r ) ∝ e i k r 4 π r ∬ a p e r t u r e E i n c ( x ′ , y ′ ) e − i k sin ⁡ θ ( cos ⁡ ϕ x ′ + sin ⁡ ϕ y ′ ) d x ′ d y ′ . {\displaystyle \Psi (r)\propto {\frac {e^{ikr}}{4\pi r}}\iint \limits _{\mathrm {aperture} }\!\!E_{\mathrm {inc} }(x',y')e^{-ik\sin \theta (\cos \phi x'+\sin \phi y')}\,dx'\,dy'.} Letting k x = k sin ⁡ θ cos ⁡ ϕ {\displaystyle k_{x}=k\sin \theta \cos \phi } and k y = k sin ⁡ θ sin ⁡ ϕ , {\displaystyle k_{y}=k\sin \theta \sin \phi \,,}

4284-467: The far-field / Fraunhofer region, this becomes the spatial Fourier transform of the aperture distribution. Huygens' principle when applied to an aperture simply says that the far-field diffraction pattern is the spatial Fourier transform of the aperture shape, and this is a direct by-product of using the parallel-rays approximation, which is identical to doing a plane wave decomposition of the aperture plane fields (see Fourier optics ). The way in which

SECTION 50

#1732858415690

4368-404: The field-flattening problem in Schmidt's design by placing a doubly convex lens slightly in front of the film holder. This resulting system is known as: Schmidt–Väisälä camera or sometimes as Väisälä camera . In 1940, James Baker of Harvard University modified the Schmidt camera design to include a convex secondary mirror, which reflected light back toward the primary. The photographic plate

4452-469: The first minimum of one coincides with the maximum of the other. Thus, the larger the aperture of the lens compared to the wavelength, the finer the resolution of an imaging system. This is one reason astronomical telescopes require large objectives, and why microscope objectives require a large numerical aperture (large aperture diameter compared to working distance) in order to obtain the highest possible resolution. The speckle pattern seen when using

4536-407: The focal length of the system. Schmidt corrector plates can be manufactured in many ways. The most basic method, called the "classical approach", involves directly figuring the corrector by grinding and polishing the aspherical shape into a flat glass blank using specially shaped and sized tools. This method requires a high degree of skill and training on the part of the optical engineer creating

4620-533: The horizontal. The ability of an imaging system to resolve detail is ultimately limited by diffraction . This is because a plane wave incident on a circular lens or mirror is diffracted as described above. The light is not focused to a point but forms an Airy disk having a central spot in the focal plane whose radius (as measured to the first null) is Δ x = 1.22 λ N , {\displaystyle \Delta x=1.22\lambda N,} where λ {\displaystyle \lambda }

4704-715: The incident angle θ i {\displaystyle \theta _{\text{i}}} of the light onto the slit is non-zero (which causes a change in the path length ), the intensity profile in the Fraunhofer regime (i.e. far field) becomes: I ( θ ) = I 0 sinc 2 ⁡ [ d π λ ( sin ⁡ θ ± sin ⁡ θ i ) ] {\displaystyle I(\theta )=I_{0}\,\operatorname {sinc} ^{2}\left[{\frac {d\pi }{\lambda }}(\sin \theta \pm \sin \theta _{\text{i}})\right]} The choice of plus/minus sign depends on

4788-538: The light diffracted by 2-element and 5-element gratings where the grating spacings are the same; it can be seen that the maxima are in the same position, but the detailed structures of the intensities are different. The far-field diffraction of a plane wave incident on a circular aperture is often referred to as the Airy disk . The variation in intensity with angle is given by I ( θ ) = I 0 ( 2 J 1 ( k

4872-456: The night of 7 August 2006. That comet was the brightest seen in over 40 years. Other notable discoveries made by the telescope include finding 7604 Kridsadaporn , C/2007 Q3 , C/2009 R1 , C/2013 A1 ("Siding Spring Comet"), 2012 LZ1 , (242450) 2004 QY2 and (308242) 2005 GO21 . Schmidt telescope Some notable examples are the Samuel Oschin telescope (formerly Palomar Schmidt),

4956-459: The object. Starting in the early 1970s, Celestron marketed an 8-inch Schmidt camera. The camera was focused in the factory and was made of materials with low expansion coefficients so it would never need to be focused in the field. Early models required the photographer to cut and develop individual frames of 35 mm film, as the film holder could only hold one frame of film. About 300 Celestron Schmidt cameras were produced. The Schmidt system

5040-416: The particular type of glass that was being used. The glass plate was sealed to the ground edge of the pan. Then a vacuum pump was used to exhaust the air between the pan and glass through a small hole in the center of the pan until a particular negative pressure had been achieved. This caused the glass plate to warp slightly. The exposed upper surface of the glass was then ground and polished spherical. When

5124-450: The photo of a binary star. As the point sources move closer together, the patterns will start to overlap, and ultimately they will merge to form a single pattern, in which case the two point sources cannot be resolved in the image. The Rayleigh criterion specifies that two point sources are considered "resolved" if the separation of the two images is at least the radius of the Airy disk, i.e. if

SECTION 60

#1732858415690

5208-552: The photon is created. The wave nature of individual photons (as opposed to wave properties only arising from the interactions between multitudes of photons) was implied by a low-intensity double-slit experiment first performed by G. I. Taylor in 1909 . The quantum approach has some striking similarities to the Huygens-Fresnel principle ; based on that principle, as light travels through slits and boundaries, secondary point light sources are created near or along these obstacles, and

5292-411: The point from the slit. We can find the angle at which a first minimum is obtained in the diffracted light by the following reasoning. The light from a source located at the top edge of the slit interferes destructively with a source located at the middle of the slit, when the path difference between them is equal to λ / 2 {\displaystyle \lambda /2} . Similarly,

5376-444: The region of geometrical shadow of the obstacle/aperture. The diffracting object or aperture effectively becomes a secondary source of the propagating wave. Italian scientist Francesco Maria Grimaldi coined the word diffraction and was the first to record accurate observations of the phenomenon in 1660 . In classical physics , the diffraction phenomenon is described by the Huygens–Fresnel principle that treats each point in

5460-629: The registering surface. If there are multiple, closely spaced openings (e.g., a diffraction grating ), a complex pattern of varying intensity can result. These effects also occur when a light wave travels through a medium with a varying refractive index , or when a sound wave travels through a medium with varying acoustic impedance – all waves diffract, including gravitational waves , water waves , and other electromagnetic waves such as X-rays and radio waves . Furthermore, quantum mechanics also demonstrates that matter possesses wave-like properties and, therefore, undergoes diffraction (which

5544-496: The resulting diffraction pattern is going to be the intensity profile based on the collective interference of all these light sources that have different optical paths. In the quantum formalism, that is similar to considering the limited regions around the slits and boundaries from which photons are more likely to originate, and calculating the probability distribution (that is proportional to the resulting intensity of classical formalism). There are various analytical models which allow

5628-457: The same function of the correcting plate of the conventional Schmidt. This form was invented by Paul in 1935. A later paper by Baker introduced the Paul-Baker design, a similar configuration but with a flat focal plane. The addition of a flat secondary mirror at 45° to the optical axis of the Schmidt design creates a Schmidt–Newtonian telescope . The addition of a convex secondary mirror to

5712-444: The same phase. Light incident at a given point in the space downstream of the slit is made up of contributions from each of these point sources and if the relative phases of these contributions vary by 2 π {\displaystyle 2\pi } or more, we may expect to find minima and maxima in the diffracted light. Such phase differences are caused by differences in the path lengths over which contributing rays reach

5796-480: The solution to this equation can be readily shown to be the scalar Green's function , which in the spherical coordinate system (and using the physics time convention e − i ω t {\displaystyle e^{-i\omega t}} ) is ψ ( r ) = e i k r 4 π r . {\displaystyle \psi (r)={\frac {e^{ikr}}{4\pi r}}.} This solution assumes that

5880-399: The source just below the top of the slit will interfere destructively with the source located just below the middle of the slit at the same angle. We can continue this reasoning along the entire height of the slit to conclude that the condition for destructive interference for the entire slit is the same as the condition for destructive interference between two narrow slits a distance apart that

5964-1278: The source point in the aperture is given by the vector r ′ = x ′ x ^ + y ′ y ^ . {\displaystyle \mathbf {r} '=x'\mathbf {\hat {x}} +y'\mathbf {\hat {y}} .} In the far field, wherein the parallel rays approximation can be employed, the Green's function, ψ ( r | r ′ ) = e i k | r − r ′ | 4 π | r − r ′ | , {\displaystyle \psi (\mathbf {r} |\mathbf {r} ')={\frac {e^{ik|\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '|}}{4\pi |\mathbf {r} -\mathbf {r} '|}},} simplifies to ψ ( r | r ′ ) = e i k r 4 π r e − i k ( r ′ ⋅ r ^ ) {\displaystyle \psi (\mathbf {r} |\mathbf {r} ')={\frac {e^{ikr}}{4\pi r}}e^{-ik(\mathbf {r} '\cdot \mathbf {\hat {r}} )}} as can be seen in

6048-450: The term diffraction , from the Latin diffringere , 'to break into pieces', referring to light breaking up into different directions. The results of Grimaldi's observations were published posthumously in 1665 . Isaac Newton studied these effects and attributed them to inflexion of light rays. James Gregory ( 1638 – 1675 ) observed the diffraction patterns caused by a bird feather, which

6132-464: The transmitted medium on a wavefront as a point source for a secondary spherical wave . The wave displacement at any subsequent point is the sum of these secondary waves. When waves are added together, their sum is determined by the relative phases as well as the amplitudes of the individual waves so that the summed amplitude of the waves can have any value between zero and the sum of the individual amplitudes. Hence, diffraction patterns usually have

6216-421: The tube length can be very long for a wide-field telescope. There are also the drawbacks of having the obstruction of the film holder or detector mounted at the focus halfway up the tube assembly, a small amount of light is blocked and there is a loss in contrast in the image due to diffraction effects of the obstruction and its support structure. A Schmidt corrector plate is an aspheric lens which corrects

6300-443: The vacuum was released, the lower surface of the plate returned to its original flat form while the upper surface had the aspheric figure needed for a Schmidt corrector plate. Schmidt's vacuum figuring method is rarely used today. Holding the shape by constant vacuum is difficult and errors in the o-ring seal and even contamination behind the plate could induce optical errors. The glass plate could also break if bent enough to generate

6384-426: The wave front of the emitted beam has perturbations, only the transverse coherence length (where the wave front perturbation is less than 1/4 of the wavelength) should be considered as a Gaussian beam diameter when determining the divergence of the laser beam. If the transverse coherence length in the vertical direction is higher than in horizontal, the laser beam divergence will be lower in the vertical direction than in

6468-403: The wave theory of light that had been advanced by Christiaan Huygens and reinvigorated by Young, against Newton's corpuscular theory of light . In classical physics diffraction arises because of how waves propagate; this is described by the Huygens–Fresnel principle and the principle of superposition of waves . The propagation of a wave can be visualized by considering every particle of

6552-405: The wavefront emerging from the slit would resemble a cylindrical wave with azimuthal symmetry; If d ≫ λ {\displaystyle d\gg \lambda } , only θ ≈ 0 {\displaystyle \theta \approx 0} would have appreciable intensity, hence the wavefront emerging from the slit would resemble that of geometrical optics . When

6636-666: The world. One particularly famous and productive Schmidt camera is the Oschin Schmidt Telescope at Palomar Observatory , completed in 1948. This instrument was used in the National Geographic Society – Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (POSS, 1958), the POSS-II survey, the Palomar-Leiden (asteroid) Surveys, and other projects. The European Southern Observatory with a 1-meter Schmidt telescope at La Silla and

6720-531: Was decommissioned by the ANU late in 2013 and the Siding Spring Survey near-Earth object search program closed down after funding dried up. The telescope was used by Robert H. McNaught to discover 400 potentially hazardous near-Earth asteroids which have a diameter greater than 100 metres (330 ft). McNaught used the telescope to discover comet C/2006 P1 , also known as the Great Daylight Comet of 2007, on

6804-480: Was effectively the first diffraction grating to be discovered. Thomas Young performed a celebrated experiment in 1803 demonstrating interference from two closely spaced slits. Explaining his results by interference of the waves emanating from the two different slits, he deduced that light must propagate as waves. Augustin-Jean Fresnel did more definitive studies and calculations of diffraction, made public in 1816 and 1818 , and thereby gave great support to

6888-518: Was extremely accurate; if scaled up to the size of the Atlantic Ocean , bumps on its surface would be about 10 cm high. The Kepler photometer , mounted on NASA's Kepler space telescope (2009–2018), is the largest Schmidt camera launched into space. In 1977 at Yerkes Observatory , a small Schmidt telescope was used to derive an accurate optical position for the planetary nebula NGC 7027 to allow comparison between photographs and radio maps of

6972-472: Was popular, used in reverse, for television projection systems, notably the Advent design by Henry Kloss . Large Schmidt projectors were used in theaters, but systems as small as 8 inches were made for home use and other small venues. In the 1930s, Schmidt noted that the corrector plate could be replaced with a simple aperture at the mirror's center of curvature for a slow (numerically high f-ratio) camera. Such

7056-574: Was then installed near the primary, facing the sky. This variant is called the Baker-Schmidt camera. The Baker–Nunn design, by Baker and Joseph Nunn , replaces the Baker-Schmidt camera's corrector plate with a small triplet corrector lens closer to the focus of the camera. It used a 55 mm wide film derived from the Cinemascope 55 motion picture process. A dozen f/0.75 Baker-Nunn cameras with 20-inch apertures – each weighing 3.5 tons including

#689310