Misplaced Pages

#170829

34-402: Award Tucker Prize Awarded for Outstanding doctoral theses in the area of mathematical optimization Country [REDACTED]   United States Presented by Mathematical Optimization Society Reward(s) $ 1,000 First awarded 1988 The Tucker Prize for outstanding theses in the area of optimization

68-478: A mathematical programming problem (a term not directly related to computer programming , but still in use for example in linear programming – see History below). Many real-world and theoretical problems may be modeled in this general framework. Since the following is valid: it suffices to solve only minimization problems. However, the opposite perspective of considering only maximization problems would be valid, too. Problems formulated using this technique in

102-450: A 'first-order condition' or a set of first-order conditions. Optima of equality-constrained problems can be found by the Lagrange multiplier method. The optima of problems with equality and/or inequality constraints can be found using the ' Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions '. While the first derivative test identifies points that might be extrema, this test does not distinguish a point that is

136-1437: A Class of Connectivity Problems" . DSpace@MIT . hdl : 1721.1/5195 . Retrieved December 25, 2017 . ^ "David Williamson" . The Mathematics Genealogy Project . April 4, 2017 . Retrieved December 25, 2017 . ^ "Random Sampling in Graph Optimization Problems" (MIT) ^ "Mathematical Optimization Society" . Mathematical Optimization Society . Retrieved December 25, 2017 . ^ "Decomposition and Sampling Methods for Stochastic Equilibrium Problems" (Mathematical Optimization Society) ^ "Mathematical Optimization Society" . Mathematical Optimization Society . Retrieved December 25, 2017 . ^ "Exponential Lower Bounds for Solving Infinitary Payoff Games and Linear Programs" (Mathematical Optimization Society) ^ "Integer Programming, Lattice Algorithms, and Deterministic Volume Computation" (Mathematical Optimization Society) ^ "A.W. Tucker Prize" (Mathematical Optimization Society) ^ "New Graph Algorithms via Polyhedral Techniques" (Mathematical Optimization Society) External links [ edit ] Official web page (MOS) Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tucker_Prize&oldid=1219847892 " Categories : Computer science awards Triennial events Awards of

170-2137: A Class of Connectivity Problems". Other Finalists: Leslie Hall and Mark Hartmann 1994: David P. Williamson for "On the Design of Approximation Algorithms for a Class of Graph Problems". Other Finalists: Dick Den Hertog and Jiming Liu 1997: David Karger for "Random Sampling in Graph Optimization Problems". Other Finalists: Jim Geelen and Luis Nunes Vicente 2000: Bertrand Guenin for his PhD thesis. Other Finalists: Kamal Jain and Fabian Chudak 2003: Tim Roughgarden for "Selfish Routing". Other Finalists: Pablo Parrilo and Jiming Peng 2006: Uday V. Shanbhag for "Decomposition and Sampling Methods for Stochastic Equilibrium Problems". Other Finalists: José Rafael Correa and Dion Gijswijt 2009: Mohit Singh for "Iterative Methods in Combinatorial Optimization". Other Finalists: Tobias Achterberg and Jiawang Nie 2012: Oliver Friedmann for "Exponential Lower Bounds for Solving Infinitary Payoff Games and Linear Programs". Other Finalists: Amitabh Basu and Guanghui Lan 2015: Daniel Dadush for "Integer Programming, Lattice Algorithms, and Deterministic Volume Computation". Other Finalists: Dmitriy Drusvyatskiy and Marika Karbstein 2018: Yin Tat Lee for "Faster Algorithms for Convex and Combinatorial Optimization". Other Finalists: Damek Davis and Adrien Taylor 2021: Jakub Tarnawski for "New Graph Algorithms via Polyhedral Techniques". Other Finalists: Georgina Hall and Yair Carmon See also [ edit ] List of computer science awards References [ edit ] ^ Date, Issue (August 8, 2005). Efficient graph algorithms for sequential and parallel computers . DSpace@MIT (Thesis). hdl : 1721.1/14912 . Retrieved December 25, 2017 . ^ Date, Issue (May 28, 2004). "Analysis of Linear Programming Relaxations for

204-422: A candidate solution satisfies the first-order conditions, then the satisfaction of the second-order conditions as well is sufficient to establish at least local optimality. The envelope theorem describes how the value of an optimal solution changes when an underlying parameter changes. The process of computing this change is called comparative statics . The maximum theorem of Claude Berge (1963) describes

238-491: A local maximum; finally, if indefinite, then the point is some kind of saddle point . Constrained problems can often be transformed into unconstrained problems with the help of Lagrange multipliers . Lagrangian relaxation can also provide approximate solutions to difficult constrained problems. List of computer science awards This list of computer science awards is an index to articles on notable awards related to computer science . It includes lists of awards by

272-613: A minimum from one that is a maximum or one that is neither. When the objective function is twice differentiable, these cases can be distinguished by checking the second derivative or the matrix of second derivatives (called the Hessian matrix ) in unconstrained problems, or the matrix of second derivatives of the objective function and the constraints called the bordered Hessian in constrained problems. The conditions that distinguish maxima, or minima, from other stationary points are called 'second-order conditions' (see ' Second derivative test '). If

306-493: A structural design, one would desire a design that is both light and rigid. When two objectives conflict, a trade-off must be created. There may be one lightest design, one stiffest design, and an infinite number of designs that are some compromise of weight and rigidity. The set of trade-off designs that improve upon one criterion at the expense of another is known as the Pareto set . The curve created plotting weight against stiffness of

340-441: Is defined as an element for which there exists some δ > 0 such that the expression f ( x *) ≤ f ( x ) holds; that is to say, on some region around x * all of the function values are greater than or equal to the value at that element. Local maxima are defined similarly. While a local minimum is at least as good as any nearby elements, a global minimum is at least as good as every feasible element. Generally, unless

374-455: Is delegated to the decision maker. In other words, defining the problem as multi-objective optimization signals that some information is missing: desirable objectives are given but combinations of them are not rated relative to each other. In some cases, the missing information can be derived by interactive sessions with the decision maker. Multi-objective optimization problems have been generalized further into vector optimization problems where

SECTION 10

#1733106106171

408-509: Is not guaranteed that different solutions will be obtained even with different starting points in multiple runs of the algorithm. Common approaches to global optimization problems, where multiple local extrema may be present include evolutionary algorithms , Bayesian optimization and simulated annealing . The satisfiability problem , also called the feasibility problem , is just the problem of finding any feasible solution at all without regard to objective value. This can be regarded as

442-461: Is null or negative. The extreme value theorem of Karl Weierstrass states that a continuous real-valued function on a compact set attains its maximum and minimum value. More generally, a lower semi-continuous function on a compact set attains its minimum; an upper semi-continuous function on a compact set attains its maximum point or view. One of Fermat's theorems states that optima of unconstrained problems are found at stationary points , where

476-462: Is some subset of the Euclidean space R n {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}} , often specified by a set of constraints , equalities or inequalities that the members of A have to satisfy. The domain A of f is called the search space or the choice set , while the elements of A are called candidate solutions or feasible solutions . The function f

510-869: Is sponsored by the Mathematical Optimization Society (MOS). Up to three finalists are presented at each (triennial) International Symposium of the MOS . The winner will receive an award of $ 1000 and a certificate. The Albert W. Tucker Prize was approved by the Society in 1985, and was first awarded at the Thirteenth International Symposium on Mathematical Programming in 1988. Winners and finalists [ edit ] 1988: Andrew V. Goldberg for "Efficient graph algorithms for sequential and parallel computers". 1991: Michel Goemans for "Analysis of Linear Programming Relaxations for

544-475: Is variously called an objective function , criterion function , loss function , cost function (minimization), utility function or fitness function (maximization), or, in certain fields, an energy function or energy functional . A feasible solution that minimizes (or maximizes) the objective function is called an optimal solution . In mathematics, conventional optimization problems are usually stated in terms of minimization. A local minimum x *

578-649: The Association for Computing Machinery , the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers , other computer science and information science awards, and a list of computer science competitions. The top computer science award is the ACM Turing Award , generally regarded as the Nobel Prize equivalent for Computer Science. Other highly regarded top computer science awards include IEEE John von Neumann Medal awarded by

612-418: The value of the function. The generalization of optimization theory and techniques to other formulations constitutes a large area of applied mathematics . Optimization problems can be divided into two categories, depending on whether the variables are continuous or discrete : An optimization problem can be represented in the following way: Such a formulation is called an optimization problem or

646-591: The (partial) ordering is no longer given by the Pareto ordering. Optimization problems are often multi-modal; that is, they possess multiple good solutions. They could all be globally good (same cost function value) or there could be a mix of globally good and locally good solutions. Obtaining all (or at least some of) the multiple solutions is the goal of a multi-modal optimizer. Classical optimization techniques due to their iterative approach do not perform satisfactorily when they are used to obtain multiple solutions, since it

680-615: The Mathematical Optimization Society Awards established in 1988 1988 establishments in the United States Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description with empty Wikidata description Mathematical optimization In the more general approach, an optimization problem consists of maximizing or minimizing a real function by systematically choosing input values from within an allowed set and computing

714-435: The actual optimal solution of a nonconvex problem. Optimization problems are often expressed with special notation. Here are some examples: Consider the following notation: This denotes the minimum value of the objective function x + 1 , when choosing x from the set of real numbers R {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } . The minimum value in this case is 1, occurring at x = 0 . Similarly,

SECTION 20

#1733106106171

748-408: The best designs is known as the Pareto frontier . A design is judged to be "Pareto optimal" (equivalently, "Pareto efficient" or in the Pareto set) if it is not dominated by any other design: If it is worse than another design in some respects and no better in any respect, then it is dominated and is not Pareto optimal. The choice among "Pareto optimal" solutions to determine the "favorite solution"

782-512: The continuity of an optimal solution as a function of underlying parameters. For unconstrained problems with twice-differentiable functions, some critical points can be found by finding the points where the gradient of the objective function is zero (that is, the stationary points). More generally, a zero subgradient certifies that a local minimum has been found for minimization problems with convex functions and other locally Lipschitz functions , which meet in loss function minimization of

816-416: The fields of physics may refer to the technique as energy minimization , speaking of the value of the function f as representing the energy of the system being modeled . In machine learning , it is always necessary to continuously evaluate the quality of a data model by using a cost function where a minimum implies a set of possibly optimal parameters with an optimal (lowest) error. Typically, A

850-403: The first derivative or the gradient of the objective function is zero (see first derivative test ). More generally, they may be found at critical points , where the first derivative or gradient of the objective function is zero or is undefined, or on the boundary of the choice set. An equation (or set of equations) stating that the first derivative(s) equal(s) zero at an interior optimum is called

884-614: The interval [−5,5] (again, the actual maximum value of the expression does not matter). In this case, the solutions are the pairs of the form {5, 2 k π } and {−5, (2 k + 1) π } , where k ranges over all integers . Operators arg min and arg max are sometimes also written as argmin and argmax , and stand for argument of the minimum and argument of the maximum . Fermat and Lagrange found calculus-based formulae for identifying optima, while Newton and Gauss proposed iterative methods for moving towards an optimum. The term " linear programming " for certain optimization cases

918-451: The neural network. The positive-negative momentum estimation lets to avoid the local minimum and converges at the objective function global minimum. Further, critical points can be classified using the definiteness of the Hessian matrix : If the Hessian is positive definite at a critical point, then the point is a local minimum; if the Hessian matrix is negative definite, then the point is

952-476: The nonconvex problems – including the majority of commercially available solvers – are not capable of making a distinction between locally optimal solutions and globally optimal solutions, and will treat the former as actual solutions to the original problem. Global optimization is the branch of applied mathematics and numerical analysis that is concerned with the development of deterministic algorithms that are capable of guaranteeing convergence in finite time to

986-408: The notation asks for the maximum value of the objective function 2 x , where x may be any real number. In this case, there is no such maximum as the objective function is unbounded, so the answer is " infinity " or " undefined ". Consider the following notation: or equivalently This represents the value (or values) of the argument x in the interval (−∞,−1] that minimizes (or minimize)

1020-432: The objective function x + 1 (the actual minimum value of that function is not what the problem asks for). In this case, the answer is x = −1 , since x = 0 is infeasible, that is, it does not belong to the feasible set . Similarly, or equivalently represents the { x , y } pair (or pairs) that maximizes (or maximize) the value of the objective function x cos y , with the added constraint that x lie in

1054-399: The objective function is convex in a minimization problem, there may be several local minima. In a convex problem , if there is a local minimum that is interior (not on the edge of the set of feasible elements), it is also the global minimum, but a nonconvex problem may have more than one local minimum not all of which need be global minima. A large number of algorithms proposed for solving

Tucker Prize - Misplaced Pages Continue

1088-405: The special case of mathematical optimization where the objective value is the same for every solution, and thus any solution is optimal. Many optimization algorithms need to start from a feasible point. One way to obtain such a point is to relax the feasibility conditions using a slack variable ; with enough slack, any starting point is feasible. Then, minimize that slack variable until the slack

1122-422: The theoretical aspects of linear programming (like the theory of duality ) around the same time. Other notable researchers in mathematical optimization include the following: In a number of subfields, the techniques are designed primarily for optimization in dynamic contexts (that is, decision making over time): Adding more than one objective to an optimization problem adds complexity. For example, to optimize

1156-585: Was due to George B. Dantzig , although much of the theory had been introduced by Leonid Kantorovich in 1939. ( Programming in this context does not refer to computer programming , but comes from the use of program by the United States military to refer to proposed training and logistics schedules, which were the problems Dantzig studied at that time.) Dantzig published the Simplex algorithm in 1947, and also John von Neumann and other researchers worked on

#170829