Misplaced Pages

Social change

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

1800s: Martineau · Tocqueville  ·  Marx ·  Spencer · Le Bon · Ward · Pareto ·  Tönnies · Veblen ·  Simmel · Durkheim ·  Addams ·  Mead · Weber ·  Du Bois ·  Mannheim · Elias

#268731

33-446: Social change is the alteration of the social order of a society which may include changes in social institutions , social behaviours or social relations . Sustained at a larger scale, it may lead to social transformation or societal transformation . Social change may not refer to the notion of social progress or sociocultural evolution , the philosophical idea that society moves forward by evolutionary means. It may refer to

66-538: A paradigmatic change in the socio-economic structure, for instance the transition from feudalism to capitalism , or hypothetical future transition to some form of post-capitalism . Social development is the people that develop social and emotional skills across the lifespan, with particular attention to childhood and adolescence. Healthy social development allows us to form positive relationships with family, friends, teachers, and other people in our lives. Accordingly, it may also refer to social revolution , such as

99-407: A theory of change should include elements such as structural aspects of change (like population shifts), processes and mechanisms of social change, and directions of change. Social changes can vary according to speed and scope and impetus. Some research on the various types of social change focuses on social organizations such as corporations . Different manifestations of change include: One of

132-512: A Hobbesian trap. A common example is the dilemma that both the armed burglar and the armed homeowner face when they meet each other. Neither side may want to shoot, but both are afraid of the other party shooting first so they may be inclined to fire preemptively, although the favorable outcome for both parties would be that nobody be shot. A similar example between two states is the Cuban Missile Crisis . Fear and mutual distrust between

165-535: A Jewish family may celebrate Hanukkah while a Christian family may celebrate Christmas . Other cultural differences such as language and cultural rituals identify members of different status groups. Smaller groups exist inside of one status group. For instance, one can belong to a status group based on one's race and a social class based on financial ranking. This may cause strife for the individual in this situation when they feel they must choose to side with either their status group or their social class. For example,

198-441: A central government's control. These stable expectations do not necessarily lead to individuals behaving in ways that are considered beneficial to group welfare. Considering this, Thomas Schelling studied neighborhood racial segregation. His findings suggest that interaction can produce predictability, but it does not always increase social order. In his researching, he found that "when all individuals pursue their own preferences,

231-573: A fear spiral ( catch-22 , vicious circle , Nash equilibrium ) in which fear will lead to an arms race which in turn will lead to increasing fear. The Hobbesian trap can be explained in terms of game theory . Although cooperation would be the better outcome for both sides, mutual distrust leads to the adoption of strategies that have negative outcomes for both individual players and all players combined. The theory has been used to explain outbreaks of conflicts and violence , spanning from individuals to states. An early example of Hobbesian trap reasoning

264-402: A rather specific rank (or status) within the stratification system. That is, societies tend to include a hierarchy of status groups, some enjoying high ranking and some low." One example of this hierarchy is the prestige of a university professor compared to that of a garbage man . A certain lifestyle usually distinguishes the members of different status groups. For example, around the holidays

297-468: A social order consists of, and what its real basis is. For Marx, it is the relations of production or economic structure which is the basis of social order. For Durkheim, it is a set of shared social norms. For Parsons, it is a set of social institutions regulating the pattern of action-orientation, which again are based on a frame of cultural values. For Habermas, it is all of these, as well as communicative action. Another key factor concerning social order

330-506: A society abides by a set of personal values or the group's norms all the time. For this reason, it is generally deemed necessary for a society to have authority. The adverse opinion holds that the need for authority stems from social inequality. In a class society , those who hold positions of power and authority are among the upper class . Norms differ for each class because the members of each class were raised differently and hold different sets of values. Tension can form, therefore, between

363-516: A wealthy African American man who feels he has to take a side on an issue on which the opinions of poor African Americans and wealthy white Americans are divided and finds his class and status group opposed. Values can be defined as "internal criteria for evaluation". Values are also split into two categories, there are individual values, which pertains to something that we think has worth and then there are social values. Social values are our desires modified according to ethical principles or according to

SECTION 10

#1733126436269

396-578: Is Thucydides 's analysis of the Peloponnesian War in Ancient Greece . Thucydides presented that fear and distrust towards the other side led to an escalation of violence. The theory is most commonly associated with English philosopher Thomas Hobbes . Nobel Prize winner Thomas Schelling also saw fear as a motive for conflict. Applying game theory to the Cold War and nuclear strategy, Schelling's view

429-594: Is Oprah Winfrey, an African American woman from poverty who worked her way to being a billionaire. Two different theories exist that explain and attempt to account for social order. The first theory is "order results from a large number of independent decisions to transfer individual rights and liberties to a coercive state in return for its guarantee of security for persons and their property, as well as its establishment of mechanisms to resolve disputes," as stated in Theories of Social Order by Hechter and Horne. The next theory

462-442: Is central to much of sociology , political science and political philosophy , is the question of how and why it is that social orders exist at all. Thomas Hobbes is recognized as the first to clearly formulate the problem, to answer which he conceived the notion of a social contract . Social theorists (such as Karl Marx , Émile Durkheim , Talcott Parsons , and Jürgen Habermas ) have proposed different explanations for what

495-399: Is gained on the basis of merit or in other words by achievement and hard work or it can be ascribed, which is when a person position is assigned to individuals or groups without regard for merit but because of certain traits beyond their control, such as race, sex, or parental social standing. An example of ascribed status is Kate Middleton who married a prince. An example of achieved status

528-412: Is systematic factors. For example, successful development generally has the same requirements, such as a stable and flexible government, enough free and available resources, and a diverse social organization of society. On the whole, social change is usually a combination of systematic factors along with some random or unique factors. Many theories attempt to explain social change. One view suggests that

561-443: Is that "the ultimate source of social order as residing not in external controls but in a concordance of specific values and norms that individuals somehow have managed to internalize." also stated in Theories of Social Order by Hechter and Horne. Both arguments for how social order is attained are very different. One argues that it is achieved through outside influence and control, and the other argues that it can only be attained when

594-406: Is that people associate social honor with the place a person occupies with material systems of wealth and power. Since most of the society finds wealth and power desirable, they respect or envy people that have more than they do. When social honor is referred to as social status, it deals with the rank of a person within the stratification system. Status can be achieved, which is when a person position

627-597: Is the norm for their community. In every society, people belong to groups, such as businesses, families, churches, athletic groups, or neighborhoods. The structure inside of these groups mirrors that of the whole society. There are networks and ties between groups, as well as inside of each of the groups, which create social order. " Status groups " can be based on a person's characteristics such as race , ethnicity , sexual orientation , religion , caste , region , occupation, physical attractiveness , gender , education , age, etc. They are defined as "a subculture having

660-504: Is the principle of extensiveness. This states the more norms and the more important the norms are to a society , the better these norms tie and hold together the group as a whole. A good example of this is smaller religions based in the U.S., such as the Amish . Many Amish live together in communities and because they share the same religion and values, it is easier for them to succeed in upholding their religion and views because their way of life

693-508: The Socialist revolution presented in Marxism , or to other social movements , such as women's suffrage or the civil rights movement . Social change may be driven through cultural, religious, economic, environmental, scientific or technological forces. Change comes from two sources. One source is unique factors such as climate, weather, or the presence of specific groups of people. Another source

SECTION 20

#1733126436269

726-451: The least developed countries has slowed relatively little; as of 2022, the annual growth rate is 2.33%. In much of the developed world , changes from distinct men's work and women's work to more gender equal patterns have been economically important since the mid-20th century. Both men and women are considered to be great contributors to social change worldwide. Social order The term social order can be used in two senses: In

759-479: The actors increased the likelihood of a preemptive strike. Hobbesian traps in nuclear weapons' case can be defused if both sides can threaten second strike , which is the capacity to retaliate with nuclear force after the first attack. This is the basis of Mutual assured destruction . The Dark Forest , a science fiction novel by Liu Cixin , incorporates a Hobbesian trap into its narrative. The dark forest hypothesis , both diegetically and non-diegetically to

792-414: The first sense, it refers to a particular system of social structures and institutions . Examples are the ancient, the feudal, and the capitalist social order. In the second sense, social order is contrasted to social chaos or disorder and refers to a stable state of society in which the existing social structure is accepted and maintained by its members. The problem of order or Hobbesian problem , which

825-404: The group, we associate with: friends, family, or co-workers. Norms tell us what people ought to do in a given situation. Unlike values, norms are enforced externally – or outside of oneself. A society as a whole determines norms, and they can be passed down from generation to generation. An exception to the idea of values and norms as social order-keepers is deviant behavior . Not everyone in

858-570: The individual willingly follows norms and values that they have grown accustomed to and internalized. Weber's insistence on the importance of domination and symbolic systems in social life was retained by Pierre Bourdieu , who developed the idea of social orders, ultimately transforming it into a theory of fields. Hobbesian trap The Hobbesian trap (or Schelling's dilemma ) is a theory that explains why preemptive strikes occur between two groups, out of bilateral fear of an imminent attack. Without outside influences, this situation will lead to

891-451: The largest countries, followed by the US as a distant third. However, population growth throughout the world is slowing. Population growth among developed countries has been slowing since the 1950s and is now at 0.3% annual growth. Population growth among the less developed countries excluding the least developed ones has also been slowing since 1960 and is now at 1.3% annually. Population growth among

924-422: The most obvious changes currently occurring is the change in the relative global population distribution between countries. In recent decades, developing countries have become a larger proportion of the world population, increasing from 68% in 1950 to 82% in 2010, and the population of the developed countries has declined from 32% of the total world population in 1950 to 18% in 2010. China and India continue to be

957-528: The novel, is a form of the Hobbesian trap that has been used to answer the Fermi Paradox by arguing that any two advanced space-faring civilizations will inevitably seek to destroy each other rather than risk being destroyed by the other, like two scared armed men prowling through a dark forest, ready to shoot at anything that so much as snaps a twig. The Hobbesian trap can be avoided by influences that increase

990-413: The outcome is segregation rather than integration," as stated in "Theories of Social Order", edited by Michael Hechter and Christine Horne. Social honor can also be referred to as social status. It is considered the distribution of prestige or "the approval, respect, admiration, or deference a person or group is able to command by virtue of his or its imputed qualities or performances". The case most often

1023-509: The trust between the two parties. In Hobbes' case, the Hobbesian trap would be present in the state of nature where, in the absence of law and law enforcement , the credible threat of violence from others may justify preemptive attacks. For Hobbes, we avoid this problem by naming a ruler who pledges to punish violence with violence. In the Cuban Missile Crisis, for example, Kennedy and Khrushchev realized that they were caught in

Social change - Misplaced Pages Continue

1056-445: The upper class and lower class when laws and rules are put in place that do not conform to the values of both classes. The order does not necessarily need to be controlled by the government. Individuals pursuing self-interest can make predictable systems. These systems, being planned by more than one person, may actually be preferable to those planned by a single person. This means that predictability may be possible to achieve without

1089-434: Was that in situations where two parties are in conflict but share a common interest, the two sides will often reach a tacit agreement rather than resort to open conflict. Psychology professor Steven Pinker is a proponent of the theory of the Hobbesian trap and has applied the theory to many conflicts and outbreaks of violence between people, groups, tribes, societies and states. Issues of gun control have been described as

#268731