Misplaced Pages

Port-Royal Grammar

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The Port-Royal Grammar (originally Grammaire générale et raisonnée contenant les fondemens de l'art de parler, expliqués d'une manière claire et naturelle , "General and Rational Grammar, containing the fundamentals of the art of speaking, explained in a clear and natural manner") was a milestone in the analysis and philosophy of language . Published in 1660 by Antoine Arnauld and Claude Lancelot , it was the linguistic counterpart to the Port-Royal Logic (1662), both named after the Jansenist monastery of Port-Royal-des-Champs where their authors worked. The Port-Royal Grammar became used as a standard textbook in the study of language until the early nineteenth century, and it has been reproduced in several editions and translations. In the twentieth century, scholars including Edmund Husserl and Noam Chomsky maintained academic interest in the book.

#666333

35-741: Arnauld and Lancelot's approach to language is historical, comparative, and philosophical. Discussing the essence of French, they give examples from Latin, Greek, Arabic, Hebrew, Spanish, Italian, and German. Their work is influenced by the Modistae Grammar of Thomas of Erfurt , and later grammars and textbooks authored by scholars including Julius Caesar Scaliger , Sanctius , Petrus Ramus and Claude Favre de Vaugelas , Other influences include Andreas Helwig 's etymology , Francis Bacon 's universal language project, and works by philosophers including René Descartes , and Blaise Pascal . A core argument of Arnauld and Lancelot's general and rational grammar

70-411: A universal innate grammar , which is determinate and has a highly organized directive component, and enables the language learner to ascertain and categorize language heard into a system. Chomsky states that the ability to learn how to properly construct sentences or know which sentences are grammatically incorrect is an ability gained from innate knowledge. Noam Chomsky cites as evidence for this theory,

105-412: A certain disease might be 'innate' to signify that a person might be at risk of contracting such a disease. He suggests that something that is 'innate' is effectively present from birth and while it may not reveal itself then, is more than likely to present itself later in life. Descartes’ comparison of innate knowledge to an innate disease, whose symptoms may show up only later in life, unless prohibited by

140-658: A common grammar, a shared foundation of ontologically anchored linguistic structures. He argued grammar is substantially the same in all languages, even though it may undergo accidental variations between languages. There are parallels between speculative grammar and phenomenology , a fact that was picked up early on by Martin Heidegger , who wrote his first book, Die Kategorien- und Bedeutungslehre des Duns Scotus ( Duns Scotus's Doctrine of Categories and Meaning , 1916), on Thomas of Erfurt's treatise (at that time still mistakenly attributed to Duns Scotus). Innate Ideas In

175-402: A factor like age or puberty, suggests that if an event occurs prohibiting someone from exhibiting an innate behaviour or knowledge, it doesn't mean the knowledge did not exist at all but rather it wasn't expressed – they were not able to acquire that knowledge. In other words, innate beliefs, ideas and knowledge require experiences to be triggered or they may never be expressed. Experiences are not

210-412: A situation where his mentor Socrates questioned a slave boy about geometry. Though the slave boy had no previous experience with geometry, he was able to answer correctly. Plato reasoned that this was possible because Socrates' questions sparked the innate knowledge of math the boy had from birth. Descartes conveys the idea that innate knowledge or ideas is something inborn such as one would say, that

245-607: Is an innate brain structure which stems from a genetic mutation in humans, thus reinterpreting linguistics as a biological enterprise. In his conception, dependency structures cannot be learned using reasoning, but are acquired by the child from a hypothesized language organ . The Port-Royal Grammar does not argue that people are born rational in the sense that they possess an innate rational grammar. Rather, it contends that grammatical phenomena were "invented" so that people could express their mental experiences. Modistae The Modistae ( Latin for Modists ), also known as

280-404: Is in agreement; in short universal assent proves that there is universal assent and nothing else. Moreover, Locke goes on to suggest that in fact there is no universal assent. Even a phrase such as "What is, is" is not universally assented to; infants and severely mentally disabled adults do not generally acknowledge this truism . Locke also attacks the idea that an innate idea can be imprinted on

315-611: Is more famous than Arnauld and Lancelot, he wrote little about language and was not involved in the making of Port-Royal Grammar. The dispute also concerns Arnauld and Lancelot's analysis of their example sentence Invisible God created the visible world . In a classical view, the sentence is composed of the three unary predicates 'God is invisible', 'he created the world', and 'the world is visible'. In other words, Arnauld and Lancelot, and their later interpreters including Husserl, considered semantics and thought as compositional and being built up of logical propositions. Chomsky, in contrast,

350-488: Is our linguistic faculty. Our linguistic systems contain a systemic complexity which supposedly could not be empirically derived: the environment seems too poor, variable and indeterminate , according to Chomsky, to explain the extraordinary ability to learn complex concepts possessed by very young children. Essentially, their accurate grammatical knowledge cannot have originated from their experiences as their experiences are not adequate. It follows that humans must be born with

385-513: Is still the same as was raised by the rationalists ; the human mind of a newborn child is not a tabula rasa but is equipped with an inborn structure. Although individual human beings vary in many ways (culturally, ethnically, linguistically, and so on), innate ideas are the same for everyone everywhere. For example, the philosopher René Descartes theorized that knowledge of God is innate in everybody. Philosophers such as Descartes and Plato were rationalists . Other philosophers, most notably

SECTION 10

#1732855809667

420-457: Is that language reveals human thought structures which are based on the logic of predication . The notion is that all thought structures are based on logic and refrain from outside judgment. All languages are similar because there is only one logic. Their connection between logic and grammar has much to with the idea of the vocabulary concluding the logic of a statement, that arguments within arguments lead to an unsaid logical deduction. This idea

455-458: The modi essendi , and the modi significandi grammar's means of representing the modi intelligendi in language. This corresponds to Aristotle's tripartite semantic theory of words representing concepts which represent objects . Opposing nominalism , they assumed that the analysis of the grammar of ordinary language was the key to metaphysics . For the Modistae, grammatical forms,

490-405: The modi significandi of verbs, nouns, and adjectives, comprise the deep ontological structure of language, which objectively reflects reality. Their work predicted the concept of universal grammar , suggesting that universal grammatical rules may be extracted from all living languages. Roger Bacon may have given the movement inspiration with his observation that all languages are built upon

525-723: The empiricists , were critical of innate ideas and denied they existed. The debate over innate ideas is central to the conflict between rationalists (who believe certain ideas exist independently of experience) and empiricists (who believe knowledge is derived from experience). Many believe the German philosopher Immanuel Kant synthesized these two early modern traditions in his philosophical thought. Plato argues that if there are certain concepts that we know to be true but did not learn from experience, then it must be because we have an innate knowledge of it and that this knowledge must have been gained before birth. In Plato's Meno , he recalls

560-439: The phenotypes of certain genotypes that all humans share in common. Nativism is a modern view rooted in innatism. The advocates of nativism are mainly philosophers who also work in the field of cognitive psychology or psycholinguistics : most notably Noam Chomsky and Jerry Fodor (although the latter adopted a more critical attitude toward nativism in his later writings). The nativist's general objection against empiricism

595-400: The philosophy of mind , innatism is the view that the mind is born with already-formed ideas, knowledge, and beliefs. The opposing doctrine, that the mind is a tabula rasa (blank slate) at birth and all knowledge is gained from experience and the senses , is called empiricism . Innatism and nativism are generally synonymous terms referring to the notion of preexisting ideas in

630-519: The speculative grammarians , were the members of a school of grammarian philosophy known as Modism or speculative grammar , active in northern France , Germany , England , and Denmark in the 13th and 14th centuries. Their influence was felt much less in the southern part of Europe, where the somewhat opposing tradition of the so-called "pedagogical grammar" never lost its preponderance. William of Conches , Peter Helias , and Ralph of Beauvais , also referred to as speculative grammarians predate

665-474: The Modist movement proper. The Modist philosophy was first developed by Martin of Dacia (died 1304) and his colleagues in the mid-13th century, though it would rise to prominence only after its systematization by Thomas of Erfurt decades later, in his treatise De modis significandi seu grammatica speculativa , probably written in the first decade of the 14th century. Until the early twentieth-century this work

700-435: The apparent invariability, according to his views, of human languages at a fundamental level. In this way, linguistics may provide a window into the human mind, and establish scientific theories of innateness which otherwise would remain merely speculative. One implication of Noam Chomsky's innatism, if correct, is that at least a part of human knowledge consists in cognitive predispositions, which are triggered and developed by

735-583: The arising view was based on the stipulation that speculations referring to the Creation could be left out of social and cultural analysis. Noam Chomsky considers The Port-Royal Grammar as evidence for his innate concept of language in his 1966 book Cartesian Linguistics , associating the idea to Descartes. Chomsky's claim became soon disputed by historians of linguistics including Hans Aarsleff , Robin Lakoff , E. F. K. Koerner , and Vivian Salmon. While Descartes

SECTION 20

#1732855809667

770-402: The innate idea, not because they do not possess it. Leibniz argues that empirical evidence can serve to bring to the surface certain principles that are already innately embedded in our minds. This is similar to needing to hear only the first few notes to recall the rest of the melody. The main antagonist to the concept of innate ideas is John Locke , a contemporary of Leibniz. Locke argued that

805-703: The inquirer is not cognizant of this fact; thus, he experiences what he believes to be a priori knowledge. In his Meno , Plato raises an important epistemological quandary: How is it that we have certain ideas that are not conclusively derivable from our environments? Noam Chomsky has taken this problem as a philosophical framework for the scientific inquiry into innatism. His linguistic theory, which derives from 18th century classical-liberal thinkers such as Wilhelm von Humboldt , attempts to explain in cognitive terms how we can develop knowledge of systems which are said, by supporters of innatism, to be too rich and complex to be derived from our environment. One such example

840-498: The mind is in fact devoid of all knowledge or ideas at birth; it is a blank sheet or tabula rasa . He argued that all our ideas are constructed in the mind via a process of constant composition and decomposition of the input that we receive through our senses. Locke, in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding , suggests that the concept of universal assent in fact proves nothing, except perhaps that everyone

875-492: The mind without the owner realizing it. For Locke, such reasoning would allow one to conclude the absurd: "All the Truths a Man ever comes to know, will, by this account, be, every one of them, innate." To return to the musical analogy, we may not be able to recall the entire melody until we hear the first few notes, but we were aware of the fact that we knew the melody and that upon hearing the first few notes we would be able to recall

910-563: The mind. However, more specifically, innatism refers to the philosophy of Descartes , who assumed that God or a similar being or process placed innate ideas and principles in the human mind. The innatist principles in this regard may overlap with similar concepts such as natural order and state of nature , in philosophy. Nativism represents an adaptation of this, grounded in the fields of genetics , cognitive psychology , and psycholinguistics . Nativists hold that innate beliefs are in some way genetically programmed in our mind—they are

945-439: The phrase, "What is, is" or "It is impossible for the same thing to be and not to be". Leibniz argues that such truisms are universally assented to (acknowledged by all to be true); this being the case, it must be due to their status as innate ideas. Often some ideas are acknowledged as necessarily true but are not universally assented to. Leibniz would suggest that this is simply because the person in question has not become aware of

980-410: The present; the observation of one apple and then another in one instance, and in that instance only, leads to the conclusion that one and another equals two. However, the suggestion that one and another will always equal two requires an innate idea, as that would be a suggestion of things unwitnessed. Leibniz called such concepts as mathematical truisms "necessary truths". Another example of such may be

1015-418: The rest. Locke ends his attack upon innate ideas by suggesting that the mind is a tabula rasa or "blank slate", and that all ideas come from experience; all our knowledge is founded in sensory experience. Essentially, the same knowledge thought to be a priori by Leibniz is, according to Locke, the result of empirical knowledge, which has a lost origin [been forgotten] in respect to the inquirer. However,

1050-409: The source of knowledge as proposed by John Locke, but catalysts to the uncovering of knowledge. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz suggested that we are born with certain innate ideas, the most identifiable of these being mathematical truisms . The idea that 1 + 1 = 2 is evident to us without the necessity for empirical evidence . Leibniz argues that empiricism can show us show that concepts are true in

1085-409: The subject of debates relating to the demarcation problem between humanities and natural sciences for centuries. In the tradition of rational grammar, language is seen as a man-made invention . Age of Reason philosophers thought that God created Man social and rational, and these two natural characteristics gave rise to his need to construct a language to communicate his thoughts to others. Thus,

Port-Royal Grammar - Misplaced Pages Continue

1120-478: Was assumed to have been authored by John Duns Scotus . Widely reproduced and commented upon in the Middle Ages , it remains the most complete textbook of Modist speculative grammar. The mistaken authorship arose out of the natural affinity of Erfurt's speculative grammar with Scotus's metaphysics. The philosophy of the Modistae, as indicated by their name, was based on a theory of 'modes' of meaning in language which

1155-562: Was elaborated by Edmund Husserl in his treatise of universal grammar in 1920. He published the first formulation of generative grammar , which he based on "pure logic". Husserl's aim was to provide a counter-argument to a psychologistic view of language and logic. David Hilbert and Rudolph Carnap further developed Husserl's model, leading to the creation of Categorial Grammar in the 1930s through 1950s. More lately, phenomenologists criticized it for using simple predicates instead of modern complex ones . The Port-Royal Grammar has been

1190-522: Was looking for a historical precursor of his concept of deep structure versus surface structure . For example, the surface structure John and Mary are fishing is derived via a transformation from the purportedly not semantic but biological deep grammar structure John is fishing and Mary is fishing . However, historians have argued that it is not what Arnauld and Lancelot meant. Nonetheless, based on his observations and Descartes's concept of innate ideas , Chomsky eventually explained that universal grammar

1225-411: Was tripartite: modes of being ( modi essendi ), modes of understanding ( modi intelligendi ), and modes of signifying ( modi significandi ). To the Modistae, the various parts of speech were viewed as representing reality in terms of these modes. The modi essendi are objectively existent qualities in an object of understanding, the modi intelligendi the understanding's means of representing

#666333