Misplaced Pages

#954045

49-560: The OFW Family Club, Inc. is a political organization with party-list representation in the House of Representatives of the Philippines . It aims to represents the interests of Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs). The OFW Family Club has been providing aid to Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) and their families since 1998. It was established as a non-governmental organization in 2000 by former diplomat Roy Señeres , his family and volunteers. In

98-399: A city which needs a population of 250,000 or more to obtain its own legislative district. In 2010 , there are 57 party-list seats being contested, with 29,311,294 valid votes cast, and 12 parties having at least 2% of the vote. Ako Bicol Political Party topped the vote, receiving 1,524,006 votes or 5.20% of the vote. Akbayan Citizens' Action Party received 1,061,947 votes or 3.62% of

147-444: A distorted impression: a candidate's overall views may not enjoy the same support. For example, a person who votes for a socially liberal Republican candidate, based solely on their support of abortion , may not necessarily share the candidate's other views on social issues , such as gun rights or family values . A single-issue party is a political party which focuses any campaign, efforts, or activism almost exclusively on only

196-528: A full platform, however. The most electorally successful British single-issue party is the pro- Brexit UKIP which later due to its success started to formulate other policies. As its consequences started to become clear, its former leader Nigel Farage left and founded the Brexit Party , renamed Reform UK as the withdrawal process gained momentum. Other single-issue parties in the UK are anti- devolution Abolish

245-548: A group claiming to represent security guards and tricycle drivers, was former Pampanga 2nd district representative Mikey Arroyo , the son of the former president; Arroyo won a seat through Ang Galing Pinoy in the 2010 election . Left-leaning parties in the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (New Patriotic Alliance) bloc including Bayan Muna (Nation First), Kabataan Party-list (Youth Party-list), GABRIELA Women's Party , and Anakpawis , have been criticized in that

294-634: A lecture at the Ateneo Law School that "It's very complicated and there must be an easier formula to compute," adding that the party-list law has to be amended by Congress. In 2007, another party-list group, the Barangay Association for National Advancement and Transparency (BANAT, now Barangay Natin! ) sued the COMELEC for not proclaiming the full number of party-list representatives (they were not among on those who were proclaimed winners). As with

343-411: A single issue or a very narrow range of issues (e.g., such as a gun rights organization that might also support knife rights). It is generally believed that single-issue parties are favored by voluntary voting systems, as they tend to attract very committed supporters who will always vote. Through systems like instant runoff voting and proportional representation they can have substantial influence on

392-412: A way to funnel more votes to another candidate with quite different policies. For instance, in the 1999 New South Wales state election , candidate Malcolm Jones received just 0.2% of the primary vote, but achieved the quota of 4.5% required to win a Legislative Council seat after receiving preferences from a wide range of minor parties (including both the 'Gun Owners and Sporting Hunters Rights Party' and

441-464: Is 0 until all available seats are completely distributed. This is essentially a Hare quota , with the following exceptions: Senator Joker Arroyo criticized the ruling of the Supreme Court, saying that the court "overreached itself and engaged in judicial legislation." Arroyo later compared with parties with between "155,000 to 197,000 votes... a measly 1 percent to 1.24 percent of the votes" to

490-430: Is an example of a single-issue group. What differentiates single-issue groups from other interest groups is their intense style of lobbying. The term single-issue voter has been used to describe people who may make voting decisions based on the candidates' stance on a single issue (e.g., support or opposition to abortion rights, or in support of gun rights or gun control ). The existence of single-issue voters can give

539-474: Is entitled to a maximum of three seats; that is, one “qualifying” and two additional seats. Fourth, proportional representation – the additional seats which a qualified party is entitled to shall be computed “in proportion to their total number of votes.” The court came up with the following procedure on how to determine how many seats a party wins. First, the party with the highest number of votes gets at least one seat. It can win additional seats for every 2% of

SECTION 10

#1732855084955

588-621: Is hardly a new phenomenon. In the 1880s, the third government of William Ewart Gladstone made British politics in practical terms single-issue, around the Home Rule Bill , leading to a split of the Liberal Party . Single-issue politics are a form of litmus test ; common examples are abortion , taxation , animal rights , environment , and guns . The National Rifle Association in the United States, which has only one specific interest,

637-493: Is not necessary that the party-list organization's nominee 'wallow in poverty, destitution and infirmity' as there is no financial status required by the law." This effectively allowed anyone to be nominated by a party participating in the party-list election. However, by a vote of 8–7, the Supreme Court still decided to continue disallowing major political parties from participating in the party-list elections, directly or indirectly. In Bagong Bayani-OFW Labor Party vs. COMELEC ,

686-486: Is that effective political parties are usually coalitions of factions or advocacy groups . Bringing together political forces based on a single intellectual or cultural common denominator can be unrealistic; though there may be considerable public opinion on one side of an argument, it does not necessarily follow that mobilizing under that one banner will bring results. A defining issue may indeed come to dominate one particular electoral campaign, sufficiently to swing

735-402: The 2013 election , the group vied for party-list representation in the House of Representatives where it won two seats. The organization loss its seats after failing to garner enough votes in the 2016 elections . In the 2019 elections , OFW Family Club won back a seat. Bobby Pacquiao , brother of senator and professional boxer Manny Pacquiao , filled in the seat. In the 18th Congress ,

784-692: The Party for the Animals , the Reformed Political Party , or the former Pacifist Socialist Party . Other single-issue parties focus on the interests of a specific target group, such as ethnic minorities , retirees , and students . Green parties , cannabis political parties and pirate parties which exist in a number of countries, are explicitly based around the single issues of environmental protection , cannabis legalization and copyright liberalization respectively. These parties often evolve to adopt

833-592: The United Kingdom . The party went on to become a national party, the National Health Action Party . Similar parties in the UK are the Save Huddersfield NHS party which had representation on Kirklees Council , and Save Chase Farm party. In instant-runoff electoral systems which allow unsuccessful parties to designate where their votes are redistributed, single-issue parties may be formed as

882-533: The United States ). Alternatively, it may proceed through political advocacy groups of various kinds, including Lobby groups, pressure groups and other forms of political expression external to normal representative government . Within a broad-based party it may be the concern of a single-issue caucus . Very visible as it was in Western democracies in the second half of the twentieth century, single-issue politics

931-527: The 'Animal Liberation Party'); MLC Lee Rhiannon accused many of these parties of being nothing more than fronts. A similar type of political party has been plentiful in the Netherlands, where they are called testimonial parties . Testimonial parties are often concentrated around a specific set of principles or policies which they seek to promote without the compromises contingent on ordinary coalition politics. Examples of some successful testimonial parties are

980-670: The Communist Party of the Philippines and the New Peoples' Army (NPA). In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled in Ang Bagong Bayani-OFW Labor Party vs. COMELEC that nominees "must be Filipino citizens belonging to marginalized and unrepresented sectors, organizations and parties, as the constitution intended to give genuine power to the people, not only by giving more law to those who have less in life, but more so by enabling them to become veritable lawmakers themselves." In

1029-573: The House of Representatives passed a bill proposed the creation of the Department of Migrant Workers which eventually became law. The OFW Family Club is one of its principal authors. It took part in the 2022 elections but failed to win a single seat. Party-list representation in the House of Representatives of the Philippines Party-list representation in the House of Representatives of

SECTION 20

#1732855084955

1078-414: The House. The so-called "Panganiban formula," named after Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban , calculates that the number of seats a party will win is dependent on the number of votes of the party with the highest number of votes. The court maintained the four inviolable parameters: First, the twenty percent allocation – the combined number of all party-list congressmen shall not exceed twenty percent of

1127-403: The Philippines refers to a system in which 20% of the House of Representatives is elected. While the House is predominantly elected by a plurality voting system , known as a first-past-the-post system, party-list representatives are elected by a type of party-list proportional representation . The 1987 Constitution of the Philippines created the party-list system. Originally, the party-list

1176-604: The Scottish Parliament Party and Abolish the Welsh Assembly Party , animal rights advocates Animal Protection Party and the Animal Welfare Party and the pro fox-hunting Countryside Party . There were also the electoral reform advocates No Candidate Deserves My Vote! party. In 2019, an anti-environmentalist Polish political party called the Party of Drivers ( Polish : Partia Kierowców )

1225-484: The Supreme Court laid down the requirements in which groups can qualify to the ballot: In Atong Paglaum vs. COMELEC , the Supreme Court ruled that the party-list system is not for sectoral parties only, but also for non-sectoral parties. The Supreme Court then laid down the basic on which organizations can join: Methods of determining winners in party-list proportional representation : Single-issue politics#Single-issue parties One weakness of such an approach

1274-564: The confirmation from the Commission on Appointments , half of whose members are derived from the House of Representatives. On March 3, 1995, Republic Act No. 7941 or the Party-List System Act was signed into law by President Fidel V. Ramos . It mandated that "the state shall promote proportional representation in the election of representatives to the House of Representatives through a party-list system". The five political parties with

1323-462: The highest number of members at the start of the 10th Congress of the Philippines were banned from participating. Each voter can vote one party via closed list ; votes are then tallied nationwide as one at-large district, with the number of sectoral representatives not to surpass 20% of the total number of representatives. The law provided that each party that has 2% of the national vote be entitled one seat each, and an additional seat for every 2% of

1372-419: The law-making process. The Constitution mandates that the sectoral representatives shall compose 20% of the House of Representatives. For three consecutive terms after the ratification of the constitution, one-half of the seats allocated to party-list representatives were filled "by selection or election." For the 1987 , 1992 and 1995 elections, the president appointed sectoral representatives, subject to

1421-414: The maximum number of seats for each party to three, of the existence of a 2% quota, and that 20% of the seats can be filled up, the court instead devised the formula above to ensure that the 20% allocation for sectoral representatives would not be exceeded, the 2% threshold will be upheld, the three-seat limit enforced and the proportional representation be respected. The formula was first used in determining

1470-433: The national vote until it reaches the three-seat limit. Therefore: T P s = 1   if   g   >= 0.02 {\displaystyle TP_{s}=1~{\mbox{if}}~g\ >=0.02} T P s = 2   if   g   >= 0.04 {\displaystyle TP_{s}=2~{\mbox{if}}~g\ >=0.04} where: For

1519-400: The number of seats for sectoral representatives, the formula for the quotient is: To get the first guaranteed seat, a sectoral party or organization should at least get 2% of the total votes cast for partly list elections. The formula for the quotient is: If the total number of guaranteed seats awarded is less than the total number of seats reserved for sectoral representatives ( S ),

OFW Family Club - Misplaced Pages Continue

1568-428: The other cases, the Supreme Court condensed all the cases to one case. The court ruled on April 21, 2009, that the 2% election threshold unconstitutional, and stipulated that for every four legislative districts created, one seat for sectoral representatives should be created; this thereby increased the sectoral seats in the 14th Congress from 22 to 55; the Supreme Court, however, upheld the 3-seat cap. To determine

1617-547: The other parties surpassing the 2% threshold, they all automatically win one seat; additional seats will be won according to the following formula. where: The product, disregarding integers, is the number of additional seats for the party. Prior to the adopting the "Panganiban formula," the court considered applying the Niemayer formula used in the allocation of seats in the German Bundestag . However, since R.A. 7941 limits

1666-622: The person next in line on the list assumes the seat. In 2000, the Veterans Federation Party (VFP), the Akbayan! Citizens' Action Party and several other parties sued the COMELEC which led a case in the Supreme Court ; the court ruling changed the way how the seats are allocated for the winning parties. In 1998, only 14 representatives were elected out of 13 winning parties, well short of the then 52 representatives needed to fill up 20% of

1715-550: The personalities in these parties were merely pursuing "ideological objectives" within Congress to support the outlawed Communist Party of the Philippines ' objective of overthrowing the ruling system through "bloody means." In January 2021, President Rodrigo Duterte urged leaders of the Congress to abolish the party list system, due to allegations that some parties, particularly the Makabayan bloc, were "sympathizers or connected" to

1764-485: The result of the 2001 , and was first applied in the 2004 elections . The use of this formula by the COMELEC had been labeled by certain groups as to "annihilate independent voices in the House," according to Akbayan representative Etta Rosales . The court upheld this in subsequent cases, such as the Partido ng Manggagawa vs. COMELEC and Citizens' Battle Against Corruption vs. COMELEC . Panganiban in 2010 remarked in

1813-448: The result. Imposing such an issue may well be what single-issue politics concern; but for the most part success is rather limited, and electorates choose governments for reasons with a broader base. Single-issue politics may express itself through the formation of a single-issue party, an approach that tends to be more successful in parliamentary systems based on proportional representation than in rigid two-party systems (like that of

1862-563: The results of elections. First-past-the-post voting systems tend to lessen their influence, but local single-issue parties, such as Independent Kidderminster Hospital and Health Concern , which sought to reopen the Accident and Emergency unit at Kidderminster Hospital , may see more success under this voting system. This party won the Wyre Forest seat , where the hospital is located, at two consecutive general elections (in 2001 and 2005 ) in

1911-419: The same BANAT vs. COMELEC case stated above, while the ponencia thereof pointed out that neither the 1987 Constitution nor R.A. 7941 prohibits major political parties from participating in the party-list election, it was emphasized that they must do so by establishing or forming coalitions with sectoral organizations for electoral or political purposes. In fact, Associate Justice Antonio Carpio noted that "it

1960-500: The top sectoral parties are given a seat each until the 63 seats are filled. A voter therefore has two parallel votes in House of Representatives elections—for district representative and for the under-represented sectoral-party list representative/s. Neither vote affects the other. Party-list representation makes use of the tendency for proportional representation systems to favor single-issue parties , and applies that tendency to allow underrepresented sectors to represent themselves in

2009-421: The total membership of the House of Representatives, including those elected under the party list. Second, the two percent threshold – only those parties garnering a minimum of two percent of the total valid votes cast for the party-list system are “qualified” to have a seat in the House of Representatives; Third, the three-seat limit – each qualified party, regardless of the number of votes it actually obtained,

OFW Family Club - Misplaced Pages Continue

2058-480: The unassigned seats will awarded in the second round of seat allocation. To get the number of additional seats, this formula will be followed. If the total number of seats awarded after two rounds is still less than the total number of seats reserved for sectoral representatives ( S ), the remaining seats will be assigned to sectoral organizations next in rank (one seat each organization) whose R 2 {\displaystyle {R_{2}}} result

2107-440: The vote thereafter until a party has three seats. This means that a party can win the maximum three seats if it surpasses 6% of the national vote. While the law was first used for the 1998 election , and several parties did meet the 2% quota during the succeeding elections, they did not fill up the required 20% allocation for party-list representatives of the constitution. Furthermore, the votes for parties that had more than 6% of

2156-478: The vote were considered wasted . Ateneo de Manila University mathematics professor Felix Muga II said that "Any seat allocation formula that imposes a seat-capping mechanism on the party-list proportional representation voting system contradicts the social justice provision of the 1987 Constitution." Any vacancy is filled by the person next in line on the list; in cases where a seated sectoral representative switches parties, that representative loses their seat and

2205-698: The vote. Alagad received 227,281 or 0.78% of the vote. A much simpler understanding of the formula is as follows: While the party-list system has been used by some sectors that have not been able to participate in government in order to have a voice in Congress, allegations from left-leaning party-list organizations state that several parties were used as fronts by then-President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo 's ruling administration to further its interests. Parties such as 1-UTAK, purportedly representing transport groups, and PACYAW, which claims to advocate athletes and sports personnel, have government officials for nominees. The first nominee of Ang Galing Pinoy , for instance,

2254-453: The votes are then arranged in descending order, with the parties that won at least 2% of the national vote given one seat, with additional seats determined by a formula dependent on the number of votes garnered by the party. No party wins more than three seats. If the number of sectoral representatives does not reach 20% of the total number of representatives in the House, parties that haven't won seats but garnered enough votes to place them among

2303-409: The winners should be determined, and the allocation of seats for the winning parties—has been controversial ever since the party-list election was first contested in 1998 and has resulted in several landmark COMELEC and Supreme Court cases. Party-list representatives are indirectly elected via a party-list election wherein the voter votes for the party and not for the party's nominees ( closed list );

2352-597: Was formed with the aim of "fighting for the rights of drivers and hauliers" . In Norway, there is also a party called Patient Focus (Norway) as a support movement for an expansion of the hospital in Alta Municipality in Finnmark . The Anti-Masonic Party opposed Freemasonry. Rent is Too Damn High is focused on housing. The Free-Soil Party opposed slavery. In Australia, a number of single-issue parties have been elected to federal and state parliaments such as

2401-711: Was open to underrepresented community sectors or groups, including labor, peasant, urban poor, indigenous cultural, women, youth, and other such sectors as may be defined by law (except the religious sector). However, a 2013 Supreme Court decision clarified that the party-list is a system of proportional representation open to various kinds of groups and parties, and not an exercise exclusive to marginalized sectors. National parties or organizations and regional parties or organizations do not need to organize along sectoral lines and do not need to represent any marginalized and underrepresented sector. The determination of what parties are allowed to participate—who their nominees should be, how

#954045