Misplaced Pages

#37962

42-794: Despite its name, NAPA has always been widely used outside the Americas. For example, a version of it is the standard for the transcription of Arabic in articles published in the Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft , the journal of the German Oriental Society . Diacritics are more widely used in Americanist notation than in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), which seeks to use as few diacritics as possible for phonemic distinctions, retaining them only for

84-450: A a꞉ a꞉꞉ ⟩ or ⟨ a aꞏ a꞉ ⟩. Primary and secondary stress are e.g. ⟨ á ⟩ and ⟨ à ⟩. Voicelessness is e.g. ⟨ ḁ ⟩, as in the IPA. Creak, murmur, rhoticity et al. are as in the IPA. According to Pullum & Ladusaw (1996), typical Americanist usage at the time was more-or-less as follows: Pike (1947) presents the following: Nasalization

126-412: A dot. Kurath (1939) is as follows. Enclosed in parentheses are rounded vowels. Apart from ⟨ ʚ, ꭤ ⟩ and some differences in alignment, it is essentially the IPA. Chomsky & Halle (1968) proposed the following schema, which was hardly ever used. In addition to the table, there was ⟨ə⟩ for an unstressed reduced vowel. Pike (1947) provides the following tone marks: Stress

168-452: A phonetic alphabet which included an elaborate system for vowels. Alexander John Ellis had also suggested vowel symbols for his phonetic alphabets. Sweet did much work on the systematic description of vowels, producing an elaborate system of vowel description involving a multitude of symbols. Jones however was the one who is generally credited with having gone much of the way towards a practical solution through his scheme of 'cardinal vowels',

210-503: A phonetic notation that could be easily created from typefaces of existing orthographies. This was seen as more practical and more cost-efficient, as many of the characters chosen already existed in Greek and East European orthographies. Abercrombie (1991:44–45) recounts the following concerning the Americanist tradition: In America phonetic notation has had a curious history. Bloomfield used IPA notation in his early book An Introduction to

252-491: A post he held until his retirement in 1949. From 1906 onwards, Jones was an active member of the International Phonetic Association, and was assistant secretary from 1907 to 1927, secretary from 1927 to 1949, and president from 1950 to 1967. In 1909, Jones wrote the short Pronunciation of English , a book he later radically revised. The resulting work, An Outline of English Phonetics , followed in 1918 and

294-486: A pronunciation dictionary but it was now that he produced the first edition of his famous English Pronouncing Dictionary , a work which in revised form is still in print. It was here that the cardinal vowel diagram made a first appearance. The problem of the phonetic description of vowels is of long standing, going back to the era of the ancient Indian linguists. Three nineteenth-century British phoneticians worked on this topic. Alexander Melville Bell (1867) devised

336-457: A relatively simple system of reference vowels which for many years has been taught systematically to students within the British tradition. Much of the inspiration for this scheme can be found in the earlier publications of Passy. In the original form of the cardinal vowels, Jones employed a dual-parameter system of description based on the supposed height of the tongue arch together with the shape of

378-465: A reputation for being predominantly prescriptive , and tend to be considered by some therefore to be not very scholarly. In their publications and periodicals the notation they use, when writing of pronunciation, is that of the IPA. My belief is that the last thing a member of an American Linguistics Department wants is to be mistaken for a member of a Speech Department; but if he were to use IPA notation in his writings he would certainly lay himself open to

420-523: A somewhat different set of symbols (Boas 1911). In 1916, a publication by the American Anthropological Society greatly expanded upon Boas's alphabet. This same alphabet was discussed and modified in articles by Bloomfield & Bolling (1927) and Herzog et al. (1934). The Americanist notation may be seen in the journals American Anthropologist , International Journal of American Linguistics , and Language . Useful sources explaining

462-548: A subtag for text in this notation. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenl%C3%A4ndischen Gesellschaft The Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft ( lit.   ' Journal of the German Oriental Society ' ) is a peer-reviewed academic journal covering Oriental studies , published by Harrassowitz Verlag on behalf of the Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft . It

SECTION 10

#1732852791038

504-436: Is ⟨ C꞉ ⟩ or ⟨ CC ⟩. Glottalization is e.g. ⟨ č̓ ⟩ or ⟨ m̓ ⟩ (ejectives are not distinguished from other types of glottalization). Palatalization is written ⟨ Cʸ ⟩. Labialization, velarization, aspiration, voicelessness and prenasalization are as in the IPA. Pharyngeals, epiglottals and glottals are as in the IPA, as are implosives and clicks. Differences from

546-464: Is V̨ or Vⁿ. A long vowel is V꞉ or Vꞏ; half-long is V‧ (raised dot). Positional variants are fronted V˂, backed V˃, raised V˄ and lowered V˅. Bloch & Trager (1942) proposed the following schema, which was never used. They use a single dot for central vowels and a dieresis to reverse backness. The only central vowels with their own letters are ⟨ɨ⟩ , which already has a dot, and ⟨ᵻ⟩ , which would not be distinct if formed with

588-481: Is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . See tips for writing articles about academic journals . Further suggestions might be found on the article's talk page . Daniel Jones (phonetician) Daniel Jones (12 September 1881 – 4 December 1967) was a British phonetician who studied under Paul Passy , professor of phonetics at the École des Hautes Études at the Sorbonne ( University of Paris ). He

630-491: Is primary ˈCV or V́ and secondary ˌCV or V̀. Short or intermediate and long or final 'pauses' are |, ||, as in IPA. Syllable division is CV.CV, as in IPA, and morpheme boundaries are CV-CV. The following charts were agreed by committee of the American Anthropological Association in 1916. The vowel chart is based on the classification of H. Sweet. The high central vowels are differentiated by moving

672-504: Is the first truly comprehensive description of British Received Pronunciation , and the first such description of the standard pronunciation of any language. The year 1917 was a landmark for Jones in many ways. He became the first linguist in the western world to use the term phoneme in its current sense, employing the word in his article "The phonetic structure of the Sechuana Language". Jones had made an earlier notable attempt at

714-582: The ⟨r⟩ character. This usage is common practice in Americanist and also other notational traditions (such as the IPA ). This lack of detail, although economical and phonologically sound, requires a more careful reading of a given language's phonological description to determine the precise phonetics. A list of rhotics is given below. Other flaps are ⟨ň⟩ , ⟨l͏̌⟩ , etc. There are many alternate symbols seen in Americanist transcription. Below are some equivalent symbols matched with

756-536: The Simplified Spelling Society . Apart from his own vast array of published work, Jones acted as mentor to numerous scholars who later went on to become famous linguists in their own right. These included such names as Lilias Armstrong , Harold Palmer , Ida C. Ward , Hélène Coustenoble, Arthur Lloyd James , Dennis Fry , A. C. Gimson , Gordon Arnold, J.D. O'Connor , Clive Sansom , and many more. For several decades, his department at University College

798-399: The 1930s, he was being taught phonetics by, as he put it, a "pleasant Dane", who made him use the IPA symbol for sh in ship , among others. Some while later he used those symbols in some work on an American Indian language he had done for Sapir . When Sapir saw the work he "simply blew up", Voegelin said, and demanded that in future Voegelin should use 's wedge' (as š was called), instead of

840-434: The Greek and Latin alphabets are used side-by-side. Another contrasting feature is that, to represent some of the same sounds, the Americanist tradition relies heavily on letters modified with diacritics; whereas the IPA, which reserves diacritics for other specific uses, gave Greek and Latin letters new shapes. These differing approaches reflect the traditions' differing philosophies. The Americanist linguists were interested in

882-399: The IPA fall into a few broad categories: use of diacritics to derive the other coronal and dorsal articulations from the alveolar and velar, respectively; use of c j λ ƛ for affricates; y for its consonantal value, and r for a tap rather than a trill. Notes: About 90% of languages only have one phonemic rhotic consonant . As a result, rhotic consonants are generally transcribed with

SECTION 20

#1732852791038

924-441: The IPA symbol. I have no doubt that the "pleasant Dane" was H. J. Uldall , one of Jones 's most brilliant students, who was later to become one of the founders of glossematics , with Louis Hjelmslev . Uldall did a great deal of research into Californian languages, especially into Maidu or Nisenan . Most of the texts he collected were not published during his lifetime. It is ironic that when they were published, posthumously, by

966-781: The International Phonetic Alphabet, but have become obsolete in the latter , such as ⟨ ι ⟩. Over the years, NAPA has drawn closer to the IPA. This can be seen, for example, in a comparison of Edward Sapir 's earlier and later works. However, there remain significant differences. Among these are: John Wesley Powell used an early set of phonetic symbols in his publications (particularly Powell 1880) on American language families, although he chose symbols which had their origins in work by other phoneticians and American writers ( e.g. , Pickering 1820; Cass 1821a, 1821b; Hale 1846; Lepsius 1855, 1863; Gibbs 1861; and Powell 1877). The influential anthropologist Franz Boas used

1008-501: The International Phonetic Association still uses a version of Jones's model, and includes a Jones-type vowel diagram on its influential International Phonetic Alphabet leaflet contained in the "Handbook of the International Association". Many phoneticians (especially those trained in the British school) resort to it constantly as a quick and convenient form of reference. Although Jones is especially remembered for his work on

1050-562: The Study of Language , 1914, and in the English edition of his more famous Language , 1935. But since then, a strange hostility has been shown by many American linguists to IPA notation, especially to certain of its symbols. An interesting and significant story was once told by Carl Voegelin during a symposium held in New York in 1952 on the present state of anthropology. He told how, at the beginning of

1092-529: The University of California Press, the texts were "reorthographized", as the editor's introduction put it: the IPA symbols Uldall had used were removed and replaced by others. What is strange is that the IPA symbols seem so obviously preferable to the Americanist alternatives, the 'long s' to the 's wedge', for example. As Jones often pointed out, in connected texts, for the sake of legibility diacritics should be avoided as far as possible. Many Americanist texts give

1134-458: The ambiguity of the rhotics below, and minor graphic variants (ȼ g γ for c ɡ ɣ and the placement of the diacritic in g̑ γ̑), this is compatible with the WIELD recommendations. Only precomposed affricates are shown below; others may be indicated by digraphs (e.g. ⟨dz⟩ ). Ejectives and implosives follow the same conventions as in the IPA, apart from the ejective apostrophe being placed above

1176-519: The back vowels (such as [o, u]) have more marked lip-rounding as vowel height increases. Jones thus arrived at a set of eight "primary Cardinal Vowels", and recorded these on gramophone disc for HMV in 1917. Later modifications to his theory allowed for an additional set of eight "secondary Cardinal Vowels" with reverse lip shapes, permitting the representation of eight secondary cardinal vowels (front rounded and back unrounded). Eventually, Jones also devised symbols for central vowels and positioned these on

1218-543: The base letter. Pike (1947) provides the following set of symbols: Voiceless, voiced and syllabic consonants may also be C̥, C̬ and C̩, as in IPA. Aspirated consonants are Cʻ or C̥ʰ / C̬ʱ. Non-audible release is indicated with superscripting, Vꟲ. Fortis is C͈ and lenis C᷂. Labialization is C̮ or Cʷ; palatalization is Ꞔ, C⁽ⁱ⁾ or Cʸ; velarization is C⁽ᵘ⁾, and pharyngealization is C̴. Other airstream mechanisms are pulmonic ingressive C, ejective Cˀ, implosive Cˁ, click C˂, and lingual ejective (spurt) C˃. WIELD recommends

1260-546: The centralizing dot to the left rather than with a cross stroke. IPA equivalents are given in a few cases that may not be clear. Notes: The journal Anthropos published the alphabet to be used in their articles in 1907. It is the same basic system that Sapir and Boas introduced to the United States. Transcription is italic, without other delimiters. Following are symbols that differ among well-known Americanist sources. The IETF language tags register fonnapa as

1302-538: The dental–alveolar distinction. Americanist notation relies on diacritics to distinguish many other distinctions that are phonemic in the languages it transcribes. On the other hand, Americanist notation uses single letters for most coronal affricates, whereas the IPA requires digraphs. Otherwise Americanist notation has grown increasingly similar to IPA, and has abandoned many of the more obscure letters it once employed. Certain symbols in NAPA were once identical to those of

Americanist phonetic notation - Misplaced Pages Continue

1344-434: The following conventions. It does not provide characters for distinctions that are not attested in the literature: No distinction is made between front and central for the lowest unrounded vowels. Diphthongs are e.g. ⟨ ai ⟩ or ⟨ ay ⟩, depending on phonological analysis. Nasal vowels are e.g. ⟨ ą ⟩. Long vowels are e.g. ⟨ a꞉ ⟩. A three-way length distinction may be ⟨

1386-610: The founders of the International Phonetic Association , and in 1911, he married Passy's niece Cyrille Motte. He briefly took private lessons from the British phonetician Henry Sweet . In 1907, he became a part-time lecturer at the University College London and was afterwards appointed to a full-time position. In 1912, he became the head of the Department of Phonetics and was appointed to a chair in 1921,

1428-555: The impression of being overloaded with diacritics. One may wonder why there should be such a hostility in America to IPA notation. I venture to suggest a reason for this apparently irrational attitude. The hostility derives ultimately from the existence, in most American universities, of Speech Departments, which we do not have in Britain. Speech Departments tend to be well-endowed, large, and powerful. In linguistic and phonetic matters they have

1470-429: The lips. This he reduced to a simple quadrilateral diagram which could be used to help visualize how vowels are articulated. Tongue height (close vs. open) is represented on the vertical axis and front vs. back on the horizontal axis indicates the portion of the tongue raised on the horizontal axis. Lip-rounding is also built into the system, so that front vowels (such as [i, e, a]) have spread or neutral lip postures, but

1512-614: The phonetics and phonology of English, he ranged far more widely. He produced phonetic/phonological treatments which were masterly for their time on the sound systems of Cantonese, Tswana (Sechuana as it was then known), Sinhalese, and Russian. He was the first phonetician to produce, in his "Sechuana Reader", a competent description of an African tone language, including the concept of downstep . Jones helped develop new alphabets for African languages, and suggested systems of romanisation for Indian languages and Japanese. He also busied himself with support for revised spelling for English through

1554-469: The suspicion that he was. There is no central authority. The Western Institute for Endangered Language Documentation (WIELD) has recommended the following conventions since 2016: Note however that WIELD is designed specifically for Native American languages, whereas NAPA, despite its name, is widely used elsewhere, e.g. in Africa. Advanced is ⟨ C̯ ⟩ and retracted is ⟨ C̣ ⟩. Geminate

1596-416: The symbols shown in the consonant chart above. According to Pullum & Ladusaw (1996), typical Americanist usage at the time was more-or-less as follows. There was, however, little standardization of rhotics, and ⟨ṛ⟩ may be either retroflex or uvular, though as noted above ⟨ṛ⟩ or ⟨ṛ̌⟩ may be a retroflex flap vs ⟨ṛ̃⟩ as a uvular trill. Apart from

1638-436: The symbols – some with comparisons of the alphabets used at different times – are Campbell (1997:xii-xiii), Goddard (1996:10–16), Langacker (1972:xiii-vi), Mithun (1999:xiii-xv), and Odden (2005). It is often useful to compare the Americanist tradition with another widespread tradition, the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). Americanist phonetic notation does not require a strict harmony among character styles: letters from

1680-423: The vowel diagram. He made two further disc recordings for Linguaphone in 1943 and 1956. With the passing years, the accuracy of many of Jones's statements on vowels has come increasingly under question, and most linguists now consider that the vowel quadrilateral must be viewed as a way of representing auditory space in visual form, rather than the tightly defined articulatory scheme envisaged by Jones. Nevertheless,

1722-529: Was established in 1847 and the editor-in-chief is Florian C. Reiter ( Humboldt University of Berlin ). The journal has been digitized and is available from the University of Halle . The journal is available from 1847 to 2013, together with various indexes and supplements, including the Deutscher Orientalistentag volumes from 1968 to 1995. This article about a journal on Asian studies

Americanist phonetic notation - Misplaced Pages Continue

1764-497: Was head of the department of phonetics at University College London . In 1900, Jones studied briefly at William Tilly's Marburg Language Institute in Germany , where he was first introduced to phonetics. In 1903, he received his BA degree in mathematics at the University of Cambridge , and by right his MA in 1907. From 1905 to 1906, he studied in Paris under Paul Passy , who was one of

#37962