Misplaced Pages

Moon Treaty

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies , better known as the Moon Treaty or Moon Agreement , is a multilateral treaty that turns jurisdiction of all celestial bodies (including the orbits around such bodies) over to the participant countries. Thus, all activities would conform to international law, including the United Nations Charter .

#313686

52-575: It has not been ratified by any state that engages in self-launched human spaceflight (e.g. the United States , Russia (or its predecessor the Soviet Union ), or the People's Republic of China ) since its creation on December 18, 1979, and thus it has little to no relevancy in international law. As of May 2024, 17 states are parties to the treaty. It was noted that since the 1967 Outer Space Treaty

104-685: A bill. In Australia , power to enter into treaties is an executive power within Section 61 of the Australian Constitution so the Australian Government may enter into a binding treaty without seeking parliamentary approval. Nevertheless, most treaties are tabled in parliament for between 15 and 20 joint sitting days for scrutiny by the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties, and if implementation of treaties requires legislation by

156-583: A deadline by which the threshold for adoption must be met. L5 Society The L5 Society was founded in 1975 by Carolyn Meinel and Keith Henson to promote the space colony ideas of Gerard K. O'Neill . In 1987, the L5 Society merged with the National Space Institute to form the National Space Society . The name comes from the L 4 and L 5 Lagrangian points in

208-545: A failure if it remains ratified by few countries, particularly those active in space. Only two countries (France and India) with independent spaceflight capabilities have signed (but not ratified) the treaty. Echoing legal experts S. Neil Hosenball, who is the NASA General Counsel and chief US negotiator for the Moon Treaty, decided in 2018 that negotiation of the rules of this international regime should be delayed until

260-562: A majority of both houses of Congress as a regular law. If the agreement is completely within the President's constitutional powers, it can be made by the President alone without Congressional approval, but it will have the force of an executive order and can be unilaterally revoked by a future President. All types of agreements are treated internationally as "treaties". See Foreign policy of the United States#Law . Federations usually require

312-564: A paper on "Closed Ecosystems of High Agricultural Yield" at the 1975 Princeton Conference on Space Manufacturing Facilities, which was organized by O'Neill. At this conference, O'Neill merged the Solar Power Satellite (SPS) ideas of Peter Glaser with his space habitat concepts. The Hensons incorporated the L5 Society in August 1975, and sent its first 4-page newsletter in September to

364-547: A potential solution to the Moon Treaty, and suggested that there should be legal claims to the Moon and "there should be a system to register such claims. By the way, I'm not speaking of claims to territory...I don't think it's necessary for us to deal with the issue of whether one can make a claim to the land itself, as long as one has the exclusive right to use it." The last effort culminated in June 2018 after eight years of negotiations, when

416-431: A result of resolutions adopted by two-thirds (presently at least 34 out of 50) of the states' legislatures. For a proposed amendment to be adopted, three-quarters of the states (presently at least 38 out of 50) must then ratify the amendment either by a vote of approval in each state's legislature or by state ratifying conventions . Congress may specify which method must be used to ratify the amendment. Congress may also set

468-612: A sign up list from the conference and O'Neill's mailing list. The first newsletter included a letter of support from Morris Udall (then a contender for US president) and said "our clearly stated long range goal will be to disband the Society in a mass meeting at L 5 ." The peak of L5's influence was the defeat of the Moon Treaty in the U.S. Senate in 1980 ("... L-5 took on the biggest political fight of its short life, and won"). Specifically, L5 Society activists campaigned for awareness of

520-673: A treaty to which the Senate did not advise and consent to ratification is the Treaty of Versailles , which failed to garner support because of the Covenant of the League of Nations . The US can also enter into international agreements by way of executive agreements . They are not made under the Treaty Clause and do not require approval by two-thirds of the Senate. Congressional-executive agreements are passed by

572-426: A vote. The treaty or legislation does not apply until it has been ratified. A multilateral agreement may provide that it will take effect upon its ratification by less than all of the signatories. Even though such a treaty takes effect, it does not apply to signatories that have not ratified it. Accession has the same legal effect as ratification, for treaties already negotiated and signed by other states. An example of

SECTION 10

#1732859117314

624-455: Is a principal 's legal confirmation of an act of its agent . In international law , ratification is the process by which a state declares its consent to be bound to a treaty. In the case of bilateral treaties, ratification is usually accomplished by exchanging the requisite instruments, and in the case of multilateral treaties, the usual procedure is for the depositary to collect the ratifications of all states, keeping all parties informed of

676-402: Is based mainly over the meaning of "Common Heritage of Mankind" and on the rights of each country to the natural resources of the Moon . The treaty was finalized in 1979 and, after satisfying the condition requiring 5 ratifying states, it entered into force for the ratifying parties in 1984. As of January 2019, 18 states are parties to the treaty, seven of which ratified the agreement and

728-525: Is incompatible with Indian constitution/ national law, as India follows dualist theory for the implementation of international laws. If the Parliament wishes to codify the agreement entered into by the executive thereby making it enforceable by the courts of India, it may do so under Article 253 of the constitution. In Japan , in principle both houses of the parliament (the National Diet ) must approve

780-605: The Australian parliament , this must be passed by both houses prior to ratification. [1] The President makes a treaty in exercise of his executive power, on the aid and the advice of the Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister , and no court of law in India may question its validity. However, no agreement or treaty entered into by the president is enforceable by the courts which

832-621: The Earth – Moon system proposed as locations for the huge rotating space habitats that O'Neill envisioned. L 4 and L 5 are points of stable gravitational equilibrium located along the path of the Moon's orbit , 60 degrees ahead or behind it. An object placed in orbit around L 5 (or L 4 ) will remain there indefinitely without having to expend fuel to keep its position, whereas an object placed at L 1 , L 2 or L 3 (all points of unstable equilibrium) may have to expend fuel if it drifts off

884-547: The United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) held a high-level meeting that tried to produce a consensus on a framework of laws for the sustainable development of outer space, but it also failed to do so when S. Neil Hosenball, who is the NASA General Counsel and chief US negotiator for the Moon Treaty, decided that negotiation of the rules of the international regime should be delayed until

936-794: The High Courts in the States (Chapter IV of Part V and Chapter V of Part VI); the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States (Chapter I of Part XI and Seventh Schedule); the representation of States in Parliament; and the provision for amendment of the Constitution laid down in Article 368. Ratification is done by a resolution passed by the State Legislatures. There is no specific time limit for

988-535: The Indian constitution before the ratification by the Parliament . Article VII of the Constitution of the United States describes the process by which the entire document was to become effective. It required that conventions of nine of the thirteen original States ratify the Constitution. If fewer than thirteen states ratified the document, it would become effective only among the states ratifying it. New Hampshire

1040-463: The Legislatures of not less than one-half of the States. These provisions relate to certain matters concerning the federal structure or of common interest to both the Union and the States viz., the election of the President (articles 54 and 55); the extent of the executive power of the Union and the States (Articles 73 and 162); the High Courts for Union territories (Article 241); The Union Judiciary and

1092-492: The Moon Treaty as well as the Artemis Accords, there has been a discussion if they can be harmonized. In this light an Implementation Agreement for the Moon Treaty has been advocated for, as a way to compensate for the shortcomings of the Moon Treaty and to harmonize it with other laws, allowing it to be more widely accepted. [REDACTED] Works related to Moon Treaty at Wikisource Ratification Ratification

SECTION 20

#1732859117314

1144-436: The Moon Treaty was created in 1979 as a framework of laws to develop a regime of detailed procedures, and as such, it remained imprecise: its Article 11.5 states that the exploitation of the natural shall be governed by an international regime that would establish the appropriate procedures. In order to define this regime or laws, a series of UN-sponsored conferences took place, but brought no consensus. The continuing disagreement

1196-615: The SPS/space colony concept had merit, it foundered on short political and economic horizons and the fact that the transport cost to space was about 300 times too high for individuals to fund when compared to the Plymouth Rock and Mormon colonies . In 1986, the L5 Society, which had grown to about 10,000 members, merged with the 25,000 member National Space Institute , to form the present-day National Space Society . The National Space Institute had been founded in 1972 by Wernher von Braun ,

1248-594: The US Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015 . Similar national legislations legalizing extraterrestrial appropriation of resources are now being replicated by other nations, including Luxembourg, Japan, China, India and Russia. While the "national" treaty explicitly allows commercial mining, other experts argue that these new national laws are inconsistent with the Moon Treaty and customary international law. The controversy on claims and on mining rights for profit have dominated

1300-476: The appropriation of the necessary funds. The President usually submits a treaty to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) along with an accompanying resolution of ratification or accession. If the treaty and resolution receive favorable committee consideration (a committee vote in favor of ratification or accession), the treaty is then forwarded to the floor of the full Senate for such

1352-522: The contract is to ratify it or to repudiate it. The latter situation is common in trade union collective bargaining agreements . The union authorizes one or more people to negotiate and sign an agreement with management. A collective bargaining agreement can not become legally binding until the union members ratify the agreement. If the union members do not approve it, the agreement is void, and negotiations resume. A deliberative assembly , using parliamentary procedure , could ratify action that otherwise

1404-439: The discussion around the laws governing the Moon. Experts though have affirmed that the Moon Treaty does allow commercial mining, since it allows extraction after the international regulatory regime, that the Moon Treaty asks for, is put into place. Therefore it is concluded, that the Moon Treaty is incomplete and lacks an "implementation agreement" answering the unresolved issues, particularly regarding resource extraction. While

1456-446: The feasibility of exploitation of lunar resources has been established. However since rights to economic benefits are claimed to be necessary to ensure investment in private missions to the Moon, private companies in the US have been seeking clearer national regulatory conditions and guidelines prompting the US government to do so, which subsequently legalized space mining in 2015 by introducing

1508-479: The feasibility of exploitation of lunar resources has been established. An expert in space law and economics summarized that the treaty would need to offer adequate provisions against any one company acquiring a monopoly position in the world minerals market, while avoiding "the socialization of the Moon ." In 2020 the Artemis Accords were signed, while not mentioning the treaty, they are nevertheless challenging

1560-622: The former German rocket engineer of the WW II Nazi V-2 rocket/ballistic missile program , and of NASA 's Marshall Space Flight Center and Project Apollo program manager. While the L5 Society failed to achieve the goal of human settlements in space, it served as a focal point for many of the people who later became known in fields such as nanotechnology , memetics , extropianism , cryonics , transhumanism , artificial intelligence , and tether propulsion , such as K. Eric Drexler , Robert Forward , and Hans Moravec . The L5 News

1612-419: The need for ratification often arises in two ways: if the agent attempts to bind the principal despite lacking the authority to do so; and if the principal authorizes the agent to make an agreement, but reserves the right to approve it. An example of the former situation is an employee not normally responsible for procuring supplies contracting to do so on the employer's behalf. The employer's choice on discovering

Moon Treaty - Misplaced Pages Continue

1664-418: The new government. Ratification by those states was secured—Virginia on June 25 and New York on July 26—and the government under the Constitution began on March 4, 1789. For subsequent amendments, Article V describes the process of a potential amendment 's adoption. Proposals to adopt an amendment may be called either by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress or by a national convention as

1716-758: The participating countries produce a regime that lays the appropriate procedures for orderly mining. Multiple conferences produced no consensus on these two items. After the 1967 non-armament Outer Space Treaty was signed, it was followed in 1968 with the United Nations convened UNISPACE, the United Nations Conference on the Exploration and Peaceful Uses of Outer Space. It was the first of a series of UN-sponsored conferences intended to create an international framework of laws to guide humanity's use of outer space resources. After ten more years of negotiations,

1768-420: The point. O'Neill's first published paper on the subject, "The Colonization of Space", appeared in the magazine Physics Today in September 1974. A number of people who later became leaders of the L5 Society got their first exposure to the idea from this article. Among these were a couple from Tucson, Arizona, Carolyn Meinel and Keith Henson . The Hensons corresponded with O'Neill and were invited to present

1820-472: The provisions against any form of sovereignty or private property in outer space that would make space colonization impossible and the provisions against any alteration of the environment of any celestial body prohibiting terraforming . Leigh Ratiner [a Washington lawyer/lobbyist] "played the key role in the lobbying effort, although he had energetic help from L-5 activists, notably Eric Drexler and Christine Peterson ." Although economic analysis indicated

1872-406: The ratification of an amending Bill by the State Legislatures. However, the resolutions ratifying the proposed amendment must be passed before the amending Bill is presented to the President for his assent. However, when the treaty terms are interfering with the powers exclusively applicable to states ( State List ), prior ratification of all applicable states are to be obtained per Article 252 of

1924-510: The ratification. The approved treaty will then be promulgated into law by the act of the Emperor . Treaty ratification is a royal prerogative , exercised by the monarch on the advice of the government . By a convention called the Ponsonby Rule , treaties were usually placed before Parliament for 21 days before ratification, but Parliament has no power to veto or to ratify. The Ponsonby Rule

1976-487: The resources should be used exclusively for peaceful purposes. To those ends, the treaty lays several provisions, and some of these are paraphrased below: When compared with the Outer Space Treaty , it reiterates most provisions, and adds two new concepts in order to address the exploitation of natural resources in outer space: to apply the concept of ' common heritage of mankind ' to outer space activities, and to have

2028-564: The resources that exploration may yield." It proposed to do so by having the state parties produce an "international regime" that would establish the appropriate procedures (Article 11.5). The Moon Treaty proposes to establish an "international regime" or "framework of laws" that apply to the Moon and to other celestial bodies within the Solar System , including orbits around or other trajectories to or around them. The Moon Treaty lays several provisions outlined in 21 articles. In Article 11,

2080-577: The rest acceded. Four additional states have signed but not ratified the treaty. The L5 Society and others successfully opposed signing of the treaty by the United States. In the United States on July 29 and 31, 1980, the Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space, which was a part of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation held hearings on the Moon Treaty. S. Neil Hosenball

2132-489: The situation. The institution of ratification grants states the necessary time-frame to seek the required approval for the treaty on the domestic level and to enact the necessary legislation to give domestic effect to that treaty. The term applies to private contract law , international treaties , and constitutions in federal states such as the United States and Canada . The term is also used in parliamentary procedure in deliberative assemblies . In contract law ,

Moon Treaty - Misplaced Pages Continue

2184-625: The states under the Supremacy Clause . While the House of Representatives does not vote on it at all, the supermajority requirement for the Senate's advice and consent to ratification makes it considerably more difficult to rally enough political support for international treaties. Also, if implementation of the treaty requires the expenditure of funds, the House of Representatives may be able to block or at least impede such implementation by refusing to vote for

2236-416: The support of both the federal government and some given percentage of the constituent governments for amendments to the federal constitution to take effect. Not all constitutional amendments in India require ratification by the states. Only constitutional amendments that seek to make any change in any of the provisions mentioned in the proviso to Article 368 of the Constitution of India, must be ratified by

2288-461: The treaty for ratification. If the House of Councilors rejects a treaty approved by the House of Representatives , and a joint committee of both houses cannot come to agreement on amendments to the original text of the treaty, or the House of Councilors fails to decide on a treaty for more than thirty days, the House of Representatives the will be regarded as the vote of the National Diet approving

2340-400: The treaty makes a declaration that the Moon should be used for the benefit of all states and all peoples of the international community. It reiterates that lunar resources are "not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means." It also expresses a desire to prevent the Moon from becoming a source of international conflict, so that

2392-489: The treaty reiterates the prohibition of sovereignty of "any part" of space, the current imprecision of the agreement, being called unfinished, generated various interpretations, this being cited as the main reason it was not signed by most countries. The treaty proposes that the exploitation of resources shall be governed by an international regime (Article 11.5), but there has been no consensus establishing these laws. The agreement has been described without fruition and possibly

2444-540: The treaty. At the time of the signing of the accords U.S. President Donald Trump additionally released an executive order called "Encouraging International Support for the Recovery and Use of Space Resources." The order emphasizes that "the United States does not view outer space as a 'global commons" and calls the Moon Agreement "a failed attempt at constraining free enterprise." With Australia signing and ratifying both

2496-446: Was not validly taken. For example, action taken where there was no quorum at the meeting is not valid until it is later ratified at a meeting where a quorum is present. The ratification of international treaties is always accomplished by filing instruments of ratification as provided for in the treaty. In many democracies, the legislature authorizes the government to ratify treaties through standard legislative procedures by passing

2548-466: Was one of the supporters of the treaty, and he attempted to compare the Moon Treaty to mining rights within the United States. Hosenball was unsuccessful in his attempt to convince the committee that the United States should ratify the Moon Treaty. The opposition, led by Leigh Ratiner of the L-5 Society , stated that the Moon Treaty was opposed to free enterprise and private property rights. Ratiner provided

2600-587: Was put on a statutory footing by Part 2 of the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010 . Treaty power is a coordinated effort between the Executive branch and the Senate. The President may form and negotiate, but the treaty must be advised and consented to by a two-thirds vote in the Senate . Only after the Senate approves the treaty can the President ratify it. Once it is ratified, it becomes binding on all

2652-440: Was signed, technologies and society evolved, requiring a redefinition of the rights and responsibilities of citizens and governments alike in the use and development of outer space. The primary stated objective of the 1979 Moon Treaty is "to provide the necessary legal principles for governing the behavior of states, international organizations, and individuals who explore celestial bodies other than Earth, as well as administration of

SECTION 50

#1732859117314

2704-476: Was the ninth state to ratify, doing so on June 21, 1788, but, as a practical matter, it was decided to delay implementation of the new government until New York and Virginia could be persuaded to ratify. Congress intended that New York City should be the first capital, and that George Washington , of Mount Vernon , Virginia, should be the first President, and both of those things would have been somewhat awkward if either New York or Virginia were not part of

#313686