13-606: The Montreal Convention is a multilateral treaty for the unification of certain rules for international carriage by air. Montreal Convention may also refer to: Montreal Convention The Montreal Convention (formally, the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air ) is a multilateral treaty adopted by a diplomatic meeting of ICAO member states in 1999. It amended important provisions of
26-535: A mix of currency values established by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) equal to roughly US$ 175,000. Where damages of more than 128,821.00 SDR are sought, the airline may avoid liability by proving that the accident which caused the injury or death was not due to their negligence or was attributable solely to the negligence of a third party. This defense is not available where damages of less than 128,821.00 SDR are sought. The convention also amended
39-472: A number of key areas. It protects passengers by introducing a two-tier liability system that eliminates the previous requirement of proving willful neglect by the air carrier to obtain more than US$ 75,000 in damages, which should eliminate or reduce protracted litigation. Under the Montreal Convention, air carriers are strictly liable for proven damages up to 128,821.00 special drawing rights (SDR),
52-492: A nurse injured when the medical evacuation flight she was nursing on crashed in the waters off Norfolk Island. The Montreal Convention changes and generally increases the maximum liability of airlines for lost baggage to a fixed amount 1,288 SDR per passenger (the amount in the Warsaw Convention is based on weight of the baggage). It requires airlines to fully compensate travelers the cost of replacement items purchased until
65-515: A private member's bill into the Australian Parliament in May 2015 which will seek to protect the rights of plane crash survivors to be compensated for psychological trauma. Leading Australian current affairs TV show 4 Corners on the government owned broadcaster ABC, broadcast a program focusing on the unfairness and injustice of excluding psychiatric injury on 23 March 2015 featuring Karen Casey,
78-419: A substantially increased disadvantage in comparison to other passengers suffering damaged baggage. While for non-disabled people the major issue is the loss of hold baggage, for disabled people the problem tends to be physical damage to wheelchairs and other durable medical equipment due to inappropriate stowage in the hold. Even a basic individually-fitted wheelchair may cost twice the available compensation, with
91-671: A three-month lead time for replacement. There have been further problems with airlines being reluctant to recognise that cheap mass-market wheelchairs may be unsuitable as even a temporary replacement due to the common need for customised seating solutions among long-term wheelchair users. The EU in "Communication on the scope of the liability of air carriers and airports in the event of destroyed, damaged or lost mobility equipment of passengers with reduced mobility when traveling by air" notes this disadvantage in relation to EC 1107/2006 " rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when traveling by air". The EU report notes that
104-539: The Warsaw Convention 's regime concerning compensation for the victims of air disasters. The Convention attempts to re-establish uniformity and predictability of rules relating to the international carriage of passengers , baggage and cargo. Whilst maintaining the core provisions which have served the international air transport community for several decades (i.e., the Warsaw regime), the treaty achieves modernization in
117-460: The Convention refers to "bodily injury" in setting out the liability of the carrier for accidents. Purely psychiatric injury is not eligible for compensation which has been criticised by people injured in plane accidents, legal experts and their families. Australia amended its law to adopt concepts in the Montreal Convention including: Independent Australian senator Nick Xenophon will introduce
130-633: The United States under the Air Carrier Access Act and Canada under Part VII of the Air Transport Regulations have taken action to force airlines to fully cover the costs of damage to mobility equipment as a condition of allowing an airline to operate in their airspace, and notes that the EU may have to take similar steps if the additional duties imposed on airlines by EC 1107/2006 do not resolve
143-449: The baggage is delivered, to a maximum of 1,288 SDR. At 21 days any delayed baggage is considered lost, until the airline finds and delivers it. The limitation of compensation for damage to baggage to 1,288 SDRs means that the value of damaged mobility equipment may often significantly exceed available compensation under the Montreal Convention, while the effect of the loss, even temporarily, of mobility equipment places disabled passengers at
SECTION 10
#1732859343780156-710: The issue. As September 2018, there are 133 parties to the convention. Included in this total is 132 of the 191 ICAO Member States plus the European Union . The states that have ratified represent 131 UN member states plus the Cook Islands . Other states that have ratified include Argentina , Australia , Brazil , Canada , China , all member states of the European Union , India , Indonesia , Israel , Japan , South Korea , Malaysia , Mexico , New Zealand , Nepal , Norway , Pakistan , Russia , Saudi Arabia , Singapore , South Africa , Switzerland , Turkey , Ukraine ,
169-607: The jurisdictional provisions of Warsaw and now allows the victim or their families to sue foreign carriers where they maintain their principal residence, and requires all air carriers to carry liability insurance. The main goal of the Montreal Convention was to increase available damages in relation to death or injury of passengers from the limited and outdated limits under the Warsaw/Hague Convention. The Convention does not recognize compensation for psychiatric injury or damage unless linked to physical injury. Article 17 of
#779220