Misplaced Pages

#732267

56-468: The language went extinct in the early 2010's, but an active language revitalization project is underway, assisted by linguists from the University of California, Riverside . The Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians offers classes for children, and in 2013, "the tribe ... began funding a graduate-level Cal State San Bernardino Luiseño class, one of the few for-credit university indigenous-language courses in

112-518: A dead language is a language that no longer has any first-language speakers, but does have second-language speakers or is used fluently in written form, such as Latin . A dormant language is a dead language that still serves as a symbol of ethnic identity to an ethnic group ; these languages are often undergoing a process of revitalisation . Languages that have first-language speakers are known as modern or living languages to contrast them with dead languages, especially in educational contexts. In

168-434: A vernacular language . The revival of Hebrew has been largely successful due to extraordinarily favourable conditions, notably the creation of a nation state (modern Israel in 1948) in which it became the official language, as well as Eliezer Ben-Yehuda 's extreme dedication to the revival of the language, by creating new words for the modern terms Hebrew lacked. Revival attempts for minor extinct languages with no status as

224-567: A Catholic priest. His orthography leaned heavily on Spanish, which he learned in his youth. Although Luiseño has no standardized spelling, a commonly accepted orthography is implemented in reservation classrooms and college campuses in San Diego where the language is taught. The alphabet taught in schools is: Current orthography marks stress with an acute accent on the stressed syllable's vowel, e.g. chil ú y "speak Spanish", koy óo wut "whale". Formerly, stress might be marked on both letters of

280-450: A a꞉ a꞉꞉ ⟩ or ⟨ a aꞏ a꞉ ⟩. Primary and secondary stress are e.g. ⟨ á ⟩ and ⟨ à ⟩. Voicelessness is e.g. ⟨ ḁ ⟩, as in the IPA. Creak, murmur, rhoticity et al. are as in the IPA. According to Pullum & Ladusaw (1996), typical Americanist usage at the time was more-or-less as follows: Pike (1947) presents the following: Nasalization

336-413: A dot. Kurath (1939) is as follows. Enclosed in parentheses are rounded vowels. Apart from ⟨ ʚ, ꭤ ⟩ and some differences in alignment, it is essentially the IPA. Chomsky & Halle (1968) proposed the following schema, which was hardly ever used. In addition to the table, there was ⟨ə⟩ for an unstressed reduced vowel. Pike (1947) provides the following tone marks: Stress

392-457: A glottal stop instead: ch [ʔt͜ʃ] , kw [ʔkʷ] , qw [ʔqʷ] , ng [ŋʔ] , th [ðʔ] , v [vʔ] , x [xʔ] (Elliot 1999: 14–16.) As a rule, the possessive prefixes are unstressed. The accent remains on the first syllable of the root word, e.g. no kaa may "my son" and never * no kaamay . One rare exception is the word pó -ha "alone" (< po- "his/her/its" + ha "self"), whose invariable prefix and fixed accent suggests that it

448-420: A historical language may remain in use as a literary or liturgical language long after it ceases to be spoken natively. Such languages are sometimes also referred to as "dead languages", but more typically as classical languages . The most prominent Western example of such a language is Latin , and comparable cases are found throughout world history due to the universal tendency to retain a historical stage of

504-407: A language as the liturgical language . In a view that prioritizes written representation over natural language acquisition and evolution, historical languages with living descendants that have undergone significant language change may be considered "extinct", especially in cases where they did not leave a corpus of literature or liturgy that remained in widespread use (see corpus language ), as

560-504: A liturgical language typically have more modest results. The Cornish language revival has proven at least partially successful: after a century of effort there are 3,500 claimed native speakers, enough for UNESCO to change its classification from "extinct" to "critically endangered". A Livonian language revival movement to promote the use of the Livonian language has managed to train a few hundred people to have some knowledge of it. This

616-474: A long vowel, e.g. koy óó wut , or by underlining, e.g. koy oo wut "whale"; stress was not marked when it fell on the first syllable, e.g. h ii cha "what" (currently h íi cha ). The marking of word-initial stress, like the marking of predictable glottal stop, is a response to language revitalization efforts. The various orthographies that have been used for writing the language show influences from Spanish, English and Americanist phonetic notation . Luiseño

SECTION 10

#1732845166733

672-508: A new generation of native speakers. The optimistic neologism " sleeping beauty languages" has been used to express such a hope, though scholars usually refer to such languages as dormant. In practice, this has only happened on a large scale successfully once: the revival of the Hebrew language . Hebrew had survived for millennia since the Babylonian exile as a liturgical language, but not as

728-557: A phonetic notation that could be easily created from typefaces of existing orthographies. This was seen as more practical and more cost-efficient, as many of the characters chosen already existed in Greek and East European orthographies. Abercrombie (1991:44–45) recounts the following concerning the Americanist tradition: In America phonetic notation has had a curious history. Bloomfield used IPA notation in his early book An Introduction to

784-465: A reputation for being predominantly prescriptive , and tend to be considered by some therefore to be not very scholarly. In their publications and periodicals the notation they use, when writing of pronunciation, is that of the IPA. My belief is that the last thing a member of an American Linguistics Department wants is to be mistaken for a member of a Speech Department; but if he were to use IPA notation in his writings he would certainly lay himself open to

840-523: A somewhat different set of symbols (Boas 1911). In 1916, a publication by the American Anthropological Society greatly expanded upon Boas's alphabet. This same alphabet was discussed and modified in articles by Bloomfield & Bolling (1927) and Herzog et al. (1934). The Americanist notation may be seen in the journals American Anthropologist , International Journal of American Linguistics , and Language . Useful sources explaining

896-416: A substantial trace as a substrate in the language that replaces it. There have, however, also been cases where the language of higher prestige did not displace the native language but left a superstrate influence. The French language for example shows evidence both of a Celtic substrate and a Frankish superstrate. Institutions such as the education system, as well as (often global) forms of media such as

952-436: Is ⟨ C꞉ ⟩ or ⟨ CC ⟩. Glottalization is e.g. ⟨ č̓ ⟩ or ⟨ m̓ ⟩ (ejectives are not distinguished from other types of glottalization). Palatalization is written ⟨ Cʸ ⟩. Labialization, velarization, aspiration, voicelessness and prenasalization are as in the IPA. Pharyngeals, epiglottals and glottals are as in the IPA, as are implosives and clicks. Differences from

1008-465: Is V̨ or Vⁿ. A long vowel is V꞉ or Vꞏ; half-long is V‧ (raised dot). Positional variants are fronted V˂, backed V˃, raised V˄ and lowered V˅. Bloch & Trager (1942) proposed the following schema, which was never used. They use a single dot for central vowels and a dieresis to reverse backness. The only central vowels with their own letters are ⟨ɨ⟩ , which already has a dot, and ⟨ᵻ⟩ , which would not be distinct if formed with

1064-723: Is a list of languages reported as having become extinct since 2010. For a more complete list, see Lists of extinct languages . Americanist phonetic notation Americanist phonetic notation , also known as the North American Phonetic Alphabet ( NAPA ), the Americanist Phonetic Alphabet or the American Phonetic Alphabet ( APA ), is a system of phonetic notation originally developed by European and American anthropologists and language scientists (many of whom were Neogrammarians ) for

1120-586: Is an agglutinative language, where words use suffix complexes for a variety of purposes with several morphemes strung together. The Lord's Prayer (or the Our Father) in Luiseño, as recorded in The Sparkman Grammar of Luiseño . Extinct language An extinct language is a language with no living descendants that no longer has any first-language or second-language speakers. In contrast,

1176-548: Is now considered a single lexical item (compare no ha "myself", po ha "him/herself", etc.). Luiseño has a fairly rich consonant inventory. Along with an extensive oral tradition , Luiseño has a written tradition that stretches back to the Spanish settlement of San Diego. Pablo Tac (1822–1841), a native Luiseño speaker and Mission Indian, was the first to develop an orthography for his native language while studying in Rome to be

SECTION 20

#1732845166733

1232-493: Is primary ˈCV or V́ and secondary ˌCV or V̀. Short or intermediate and long or final 'pauses' are |, ||, as in IPA. Syllable division is CV.CV, as in IPA, and morpheme boundaries are CV-CV. The following charts were agreed by committee of the American Anthropological Association in 1916. The vowel chart is based on the classification of H. Sweet. The high central vowels are differentiated by moving

1288-540: Is the case with Old English or Old High German relative to their contemporary descendants, English and German. Some degree of misunderstanding can result from designating languages such as Old English and Old High German as extinct, or Latin dead, while ignoring their evolution as a language or as many languages. This is expressed in the apparent paradox "Latin is a dead language, but Latin never died." A language such as Etruscan , for example, can be said to be both extinct and dead: inscriptions are ill understood even by

1344-582: The ⟨r⟩ character. This usage is common practice in Americanist and also other notational traditions (such as the IPA ). This lack of detail, although economical and phonologically sound, requires a more careful reading of a given language's phonological description to determine the precise phonetics. A list of rhotics is given below. Other flaps are ⟨ň⟩ , ⟨l͏̌⟩ , etc. There are many alternate symbols seen in Americanist transcription. Below are some equivalent symbols matched with

1400-495: The allophones [ə] and [ɨ] are free variants of [e] and [i] respectively. However, other speakers do not use these variants. Sparkman records fewer than 25 Luiseño words with either [ə] or [ɨ] . For one of these words ( ixíla "a cough") the pronunciations [ ə xɨla] and [ ɨ xɨla] are both recorded. Unstressed [u] freely varies with [o] . Likewise, unstressed [i] and [e] are free variants. Vowels are often syncopated when attaching certain affixes , notably

1456-478: The modern period , languages have typically become extinct as a result of the process of cultural assimilation leading to language shift , and the gradual abandonment of a native language in favor of a foreign lingua franca , largely those of European countries. As of the 2000s, a total of roughly 7,000 natively spoken languages existed worldwide. Most of these are minor languages in danger of extinction; one estimate published in 2004 expected that some 90% of

1512-612: The phonetic and phonemic transcription of indigenous languages of the Americas and for languages of Europe . It is still commonly used by linguists working on, among others, Slavic , Uralic , Semitic languages and for the languages of the Caucasus , of India , and of much of Africa ; however, Uralicists commonly use a variant known as the Uralic Phonetic Alphabet . Despite its name, NAPA has always been widely used outside

1568-497: The "kill the Indian, save the man" policy of American Indian boarding schools and other measures was to prevent Native Americans from transmitting their native language to the next generation and to punish children who spoke the language of their culture of origin. The French vergonha policy likewise had the aim of eradicating minority languages. Language revival is the attempt to re-introduce an extinct language in everyday use by

1624-399: The 1930s, he was being taught phonetics by, as he put it, a "pleasant Dane", who made him use the IPA symbol for sh in ship , among others. Some while later he used those symbols in some work on an American Indian language he had done for Sapir . When Sapir saw the work he "simply blew up", Voegelin said, and demanded that in future Voegelin should use 's wedge' (as š was called), instead of

1680-630: The Americas. For example, a version of it is the standard for the transcription of Arabic in articles published in the Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft , the journal of the German Oriental Society . Diacritics are more widely used in Americanist notation than in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), which seeks to use as few diacritics as possible for phonemic distinctions, retaining them only for

1736-434: The Greek and Latin alphabets are used side-by-side. Another contrasting feature is that, to represent some of the same sounds, the Americanist tradition relies heavily on letters modified with diacritics; whereas the IPA, which reserves diacritics for other specific uses, gave Greek and Latin letters new shapes. These differing approaches reflect the traditions' differing philosophies. The Americanist linguists were interested in

Luiseño language - Misplaced Pages Continue

1792-400: The IPA fall into a few broad categories: use of diacritics to derive the other coronal and dorsal articulations from the alveolar and velar, respectively; use of c j λ ƛ for affricates; y for its consonantal value, and r for a tap rather than a trill. Notes: About 90% of languages only have one phonemic rhotic consonant . As a result, rhotic consonants are generally transcribed with

1848-441: The IPA symbol. I have no doubt that the "pleasant Dane" was H. J. Uldall , one of Jones 's most brilliant students, who was later to become one of the founders of glossematics , with Louis Hjelmslev . Uldall did a great deal of research into Californian languages, especially into Maidu or Nisenan . Most of the texts he collected were not published during his lifetime. It is ironic that when they were published, posthumously, by

1904-781: The International Phonetic Alphabet, but have become obsolete in the latter , such as ⟨ ι ⟩. Over the years, NAPA has drawn closer to the IPA. This can be seen, for example, in a comparison of Edward Sapir 's earlier and later works. However, there remain significant differences. Among these are: John Wesley Powell used an early set of phonetic symbols in his publications (particularly Powell 1880) on American language families, although he chose symbols which had their origins in work by other phoneticians and American writers ( e.g. , Pickering 1820; Cass 1821a, 1821b; Hale 1846; Lepsius 1855, 1863; Gibbs 1861; and Powell 1877). The influential anthropologist Franz Boas used

1960-463: The Internet, television, and print media play a significant role in the process of language loss. For example, when people migrate to a new country, their children attend school in the country, and the schools are likely to teach them in the majority language of the country rather than their parents' native language. Language death can also be the explicit goal of government policy. For example, part of

2016-562: The Study of Language , 1914, and in the English edition of his more famous Language , 1935. But since then, a strange hostility has been shown by many American linguists to IPA notation, especially to certain of its symbols. An interesting and significant story was once told by Carl Voegelin during a symposium held in New York in 1952 on the present state of anthropology. He told how, at the beginning of

2072-529: The University of California Press, the texts were "reorthographized", as the editor's introduction put it: the IPA symbols Uldall had used were removed and replaced by others. What is strange is that the IPA symbols seem so obviously preferable to the Americanist alternatives, the 'long s' to the 's wedge', for example. As Jones often pointed out, in connected texts, for the sake of legibility diacritics should be avoided as far as possible. Many Americanist texts give

2128-458: The ambiguity of the rhotics below, and minor graphic variants (ȼ g γ for c ɡ ɣ and the placement of the diacritic in g̑ γ̑), this is compatible with the WIELD recommendations. Only precomposed affricates are shown below; others may be indicated by digraphs (e.g. ⟨dz⟩ ). Ejectives and implosives follow the same conventions as in the IPA, apart from the ejective apostrophe being placed above

2184-544: The base letter. Pike (1947) provides the following set of symbols: Voiceless, voiced and syllabic consonants may also be C̥, C̬ and C̩, as in IPA. Aspirated consonants are Cʻ or C̥ʰ / C̬ʱ. Non-audible release is indicated with superscripting, Vꟲ. Fortis is C͈ and lenis C᷂. Labialization is C̮ or Cʷ; palatalization is Ꞔ, C⁽ⁱ⁾ or Cʸ; velarization is C⁽ᵘ⁾, and pharyngealization is C̴. Other airstream mechanisms are pulmonic ingressive C , ejective Cˀ, implosive Cˁ, click C˂, and lingual ejective (spurt) C˃. WIELD recommends

2240-549: The centralizing dot to the left rather than with a cross stroke. IPA equivalents are given in a few cases that may not be clear. Notes: The journal Anthropos published the alphabet to be used in their articles in 1907. It is the same basic system that Sapir and Boas introduced to the United States. Transcription is italic, without other delimiters. Following are symbols that differ among well-known Americanist sources. The IETF language tags register fonnapa as

2296-647: The country." In 2012, a Luiseño video game for the Nintendo DS was being used to teach the language to young people. Juaneño, the Luiseño dialect spoken by the Acjachemen , went extinct at an earlier date. Linguist John Peabody Harrington made a series of recordings of speakers of Luiseño in the 1930s. Those recordings, made on aluminum disks , were deposited in the United States National Archives . They have since been digitized and made available over

Luiseño language - Misplaced Pages Continue

2352-494: The currently spoken languages will have become extinct by 2050. Normally the transition from a spoken to an extinct language occurs when a language undergoes language death by being directly replaced by a different one. For example, many Native American languages were replaced by Dutch , English , French , Portuguese , or Spanish as a result of European colonization of the Americas . In contrast to an extinct language, which no longer has any speakers, or any written use,

2408-538: The dental–alveolar distinction. Americanist notation relies on diacritics to distinguish many other distinctions that are phonemic in the languages it transcribes. On the other hand, Americanist notation uses single letters for most coronal affricates, whereas the IPA requires digraphs. Otherwise Americanist notation has grown increasingly similar to IPA, and has abandoned many of the more obscure letters it once employed. Certain symbols in NAPA were once identical to those of

2464-491: The dominant lingua francas of world commerce: English, Mandarin Chinese , Spanish, and French. In their study of contact-induced language change, American linguists Sarah Grey Thomason and Terrence Kaufman (1991) stated that in situations of cultural pressure (where populations are forced to speak a dominant language), three linguistic outcomes may occur: first – and most commonly – a subordinate population may shift abruptly to

2520-453: The dominant language, leaving the native language to a sudden linguistic death. Second, the more gradual process of language death may occur over several generations. The third and most rare outcome is for the pressured group to maintain as much of its native language as possible, while borrowing elements of the dominant language's grammar (replacing all, or portions of, the grammar of the original language). A now disappeared language may leave

2576-435: The following conventions. It does not provide characters for distinctions that are not attested in the literature: No distinction is made between front and central for the lowest unrounded vowels. Diphthongs are e.g. ⟨ ai ⟩ or ⟨ ay ⟩, depending on phonological analysis. Nasal vowels are e.g. ⟨ ą ⟩. Long vowels are e.g. ⟨ a꞉ ⟩. A three-way length distinction may be ⟨

2632-555: The impression of being overloaded with diacritics. One may wonder why there should be such a hostility in America to IPA notation. I venture to suggest a reason for this apparently irrational attitude. The hostility derives ultimately from the existence, in most American universities, of Speech Departments, which we do not have in Britain. Speech Departments tend to be well-endowed, large, and powerful. In linguistic and phonetic matters they have

2688-546: The internet by the Smithsonian Institution . Luiseño has ten vowel phonemes , five long and five short. Diphthongs include ey [ej] , ow [ow] and oow [oːw] . Luiseño vowels have three lengths. Overlong vowels are rare in Luiseño, typically reserved for absolutes, such as interjections , e.g. aaa shisha , roughly "haha!" (more accurately an exclamation of praise, joy or laughter). For some native speakers recorded in The Sparkman Grammar of Luiseño ,

2744-548: The language in question must be conceptualized as frozen in time at a particular state of its history. This is accomplished by periodizing English and German as Old; for Latin, an apt clarifying adjective is Classical, which also normally includes designation of high or formal register . Minor languages are endangered mostly due to economic and cultural globalization , cultural assimilation, and development. With increasing economic integration on national and regional scales, people find it easier to communicate and conduct business in

2800-446: The most knowledgeable scholars, and the language ceased to be used in any form long ago, so that there have been no speakers, native or non-native, for many centuries. In contrast, Old English, Old High German and Latin never ceased evolving as living languages, thus they did not become extinct as Etruscan did. Through time Latin underwent both common and divergent changes in phonology, morphology, syntax, and lexicon, and continues today as

2856-420: The native language of hundreds of millions of people, renamed as different Romance languages and dialects (French, Italian, Spanish, Corsican , Asturian , Ladin , etc.). Similarly, Old English and Old High German never died, but developed into various forms of modern English and German, as well as other related tongues still spoken (e.g. Scots from Old English and Yiddish from Old High German). With regard to

SECTION 50

#1732845166733

2912-418: The possessive prefixes no- "my", cham- "our", etc. Hence p o lóv "good", but o-plovi "your goodness"; kich u m "houses" ( nominative case ), but kichmi "houses" ( accusative case ). A stress accent most commonly falls on the first syllable of a word. A single consonant between a stressed and unstressed vowel is doubled. Most are geminate, such as w [wː] and xw [xːʷ] . However, some take

2968-470: The suspicion that he was. There is no central authority. The Western Institute for Endangered Language Documentation (WIELD) has recommended the following conventions since 2016: Note however that WIELD is designed specifically for Native American languages, whereas NAPA, despite its name, is widely used elsewhere, e.g. in Africa. Advanced is ⟨ C̯ ⟩ and retracted is ⟨ C̣ ⟩. Geminate

3024-417: The symbols shown in the consonant chart above. According to Pullum & Ladusaw (1996), typical Americanist usage at the time was more-or-less as follows. There was, however, little standardization of rhotics, and ⟨ṛ⟩ may be either retroflex or uvular, though as noted above ⟨ṛ⟩ or ⟨ṛ̌⟩ may be a retroflex flap vs ⟨ṛ̃⟩ as a uvular trill. Apart from

3080-436: The symbols – some with comparisons of the alphabets used at different times – are Campbell (1997:xii-xiii), Goddard (1996:10–16), Langacker (1972:xiii-vi), Mithun (1999:xiii-xv), and Odden (2005). It is often useful to compare the Americanist tradition with another widespread tradition, the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). Americanist phonetic notation does not require a strict harmony among character styles: letters from

3136-487: The written language, skills in reading or writing Etruscan are all but non-existent, but trained people can understand and write Old English, Old High German, and Latin. Latin differs from the Germanic counterparts in that an approximation of its ancient form is still employed to some extent liturgically. This last observation illustrates that for Latin, Old English, or Old High German to be described accurately as dead or extinct,

#732267