60-725: Kanada may refer to: Kaṇāda , the Hindu sage who founded the philosophy of Vaisheshika Kanada (family of ragas) , a group of ragas in Hindustani music Kanada (surname) Kanada Station , train station in Fukuoka, Japan Canada , a country in North America (as it is spelled in many languages) Kanada warehouses, Auschwitz , storage facilities in Auschwitz for looted property Kanada (insect) ,
120-477: A cause. The same cause produces the same effect; and the same effect is produced by the same cause. The cause is not present in any hidden form whatsoever in its effect. The following conditions should be met: Nyaya recognizes five kinds of accidental antecedents [Anyathasiddha] Nyaya recognizes three kinds of cause: The Nyāya theory of error is similar to that of Kumarila's Viparita-khyati (see Mimamsa ). The Naiyyayikas also believe, like Kumarila, that error
180-410: A crucial role in the classification of objects. Each school of Hinduism has its own treatises on epistemology, with different number of Pramanas . For example, compared to Nyāya school's four pramanas , Carvaka school has just one (perception), while Advaita Vedanta school recognizes six means to reliable knowledge. Metaphysics Nyaya-Vaisheshika offers one of the most vigorous efforts at
240-403: A genus of treehopper See also [ edit ] Canada (disambiguation) Kannada (disambiguation) Kaneda , a Japanese surname Kanata (disambiguation) Topics referred to by the same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Kanada . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to
300-457: A human being needs to know numerous facts, and with the limited time and energy available, he can learn only a fraction of those facts and truths directly. He must rely on others, his parent, family, friends, teachers, ancestors and kindred members of society to rapidly acquire and share knowledge and thereby enrich each other's lives. This means of gaining proper knowledge is either spoken or written, but through Sabda (words). The reliability of
360-436: A perceived cause), Sheshavat (inferring an unperceived cause from a perceived effect) and Samanyatodrishta (when inference is not based on causation but on uniformity of co-existence). A detailed analysis of error is also given, explaining when anumana could be false. The methodology of inference involves a combination of induction and deduction by moving from particular to particular via generality. It has five steps, as in
420-430: A process that involves heat, and this is the basis for all material existence. He used these ideas with the concept of Atman (soul, Self) to develop a non-theistic means to moksha . If viewed from the prism of physics, his ideas imply a clear role for the observer as independent of the system being studied. Kaṇāda's ideas were influential on other schools of Hinduism, and over its history became closely associated with
480-647: A state of motion. Kaṇāda postulated four different kinds of atoms: two with mass, and two without. Each substance is supposed to consist of all four kinds of atoms. Kaṇāda's conception of the atom was likely independent from the similar concept among the ancient Greeks, because of the differences between the theories. For example, Kaṇāda suggested that atoms as building blocks differ both qualitatively and quantitatively, while Greeks suggested that atoms differed only quantitatively but not qualitatively. Nyaya Nyāya ( Sanskrit :न्यायः, IAST :'nyāyaḥ'), literally meaning "justice", "rules", "method" or "judgment",
540-577: A theory of error, to methodically establish means to identify errors and the process by which errors are made in human pursuit of knowledge. These include saṁśaya (problems, inconsistencies, doubts) and viparyaya (contrariness, errors) which can be corrected or resolved by a systematic process of tarka (reasoning, technique). Pratyakṣa (perception) occupies the foremost position in the Nyāya epistemology. Perception can be of two types, laukika (ordinary) and alaukika (extraordinary). Ordinary perception
600-519: A village named Gautamasthana where a fair is held every year on the 9th day of the lunar month of Chaitra (March–April). It is situated 28 miles north-east of Darbhanga . Concepts in the foundational text, the Nyaya Sutras, were clarified through a tradition of commentaries. Commentaries were also a means to defend the philosophy from misinterpretations by scholars of other traditions. The Nyāya scholars that followed refined, expanded, and applied
660-700: A wide range of fields, and they influenced not only philosophy, but possibly scholars in other fields such as Charaka who wrote a medical text named Charaka Samhita . The century in which Kaṇāda lived is unclear and has been a subject of a long debate. In his review of 1961, Riepe states Kaṇāda lived sometime before 300 CE, but convincing evidence to firmly put him in a certain century remains elusive. The Vaisheshika Sutras mention competing schools of Indian philosophy such as Samkhya and Mimamsa, but make no mention of Buddhism, which has led scholars in more recent publications to posit estimates of 6th century BCE. The Vaisheshika Sutras manuscript has survived into
SECTION 10
#1732858973721720-442: Is a soul and self, with liberation ( mokṣa ) as a state of removal of ignorance, wrong knowledge, the gain of correct knowledge, and unimpeded continuation of self. Nyaya (न्याय) is a Sanskrit word which means justice, equality for all being, specially a collection of general or universal rules. In some contexts, it means model, axiom, plan, legal proceeding, judicial sentence, or judgment. Nyaya could also mean, "that which shows
780-822: Is a type of "awareness event that is in accordance with its object by virtue of having been produced by a well-functioning epistemic instrument." Pramāṇa , a Sanskrit word, literally is "means of knowledge". It encompasses one or more reliable and valid means by which human beings gain accurate, true knowledge. The focus of Pramana is how correct knowledge can be acquired, how one knows, how one doesn't, and to what extent knowledge pertinent about someone or something can be acquired. By definition, pramāṇas are factive i.e. they cannot produce false belief. So, while statements can be false, testimony cannot be false. Nyāya scholars accepted four valid means ( pramāṇa ) of obtaining valid knowledge ( prameya ) – The Nyāya scholars, along with those from other schools of Hinduism, also developed
840-457: Is also known as Aksapada and Dirghatapas. The names Gotama and Gautama points to the family to which he belonged while the names Aksapada and Dirghatapas refer respectively to his meditative habit and practice of long penance. The people of Mithila (modern Darbhanga in North Bihar) ascribe the foundation of Nyāya philosophy to Gautama , husband of Ahalya , and point out as the place of his birth
900-443: Is called nirvikalpa (indeterminate), when one just perceives an object without being able to know its features, and the second savikalpa (determinate), when one is able to clearly know an object. All laukika and alaukika pratyakshas are savikalpa , but it is necessarily preceded by an earlier stage when it is indeterminate. Vātsāyana says that if an object is perceived with its name we have determinate perception but if it
960-472: Is closer to the Vaisheshika school of Hinduism than others. It holds that human suffering results from mistakes/defects produced by activity under wrong knowledge (notions and ignorance). Moksha (liberation), it states, is gained through right knowledge. This premise led Nyāya to concern itself with epistemology, that is the reliable means to gain correct knowledge and to remove wrong notions. False knowledge
1020-612: Is defined by Akṣapāda Gautama in his Nyāya Sutra (I, i.4) as a 'non-erroneous cognition which is produced by the intercourse of sense-organs with the objects'. Indian texts identify four requirements for correct perception: Indriyarthasannikarsa (direct experience by one's sensory organ(s) with the object, whatever is being studied), Avyapadesya (non-verbal; correct perception is not through hearsay , according to ancient Indian scholars, where one's sensory organ relies on accepting or rejecting someone else's perception), Avyabhicara (does not wander; correct perception does not change, nor
1080-554: Is due to a wrong synthesis of the presented and represented objects. The represented object is confused with the presented one. The word ' anyatha ' means 'elsewise' and 'elsewhere' and both of these meanings are brought out in error. The presented object is perceived elsewise and the represented object exists elsewhere. They further maintain that knowledge is not intrinsically valid but becomes so due to extraneous conditions ( paratah pramana during both validity and invalidity). Early Naiyyayikas wrote very little about Ishvara (literally,
1140-499: Is good for his creatures. The Naiyyayikas believe that the bondage of the world is due to false knowledge, which can be removed by constantly thinking of its opposite ( pratipakshabhavana ), namely, the true knowledge. The opening aphorism of the Nyāya Sūtra states that only the true knowledge leads to niḥśreyasa (liberation). However, the Nyāya school also maintains that God's grace
1200-441: Is it the result of deception because one's sensory organ or means of observation is drifting, defective, suspect) and Vyavasayatmaka (definite; correct perception excludes judgments of doubt, either because of one's failure to observe all the details, or because one is mixing inference with observation and observing what one wants to observe, or not observing what one does not want to observe). Ordinary perception to Nyāya scholars
1260-454: Is more useful and reliable, and when it is not. In various ancient and medieval texts of Hinduism, 32 types of Upamāna and their value in epistemology are debated. Śabda (शब्द) means relying on word, testimony of past or present reliable experts. Hiriyanna explains Sabda-pramana as a concept which means testimony of a reliable and trustworthy person ( āptavākya ). The schools of Hinduism which consider it epistemically valid suggest that
SECTION 20
#17328589737211320-461: Is not Dharma simply because it is in the Vedas. Kaṇāda and early Vaisheshika scholars focused on the evolution of the universe by law. However, this was not unusual for his times since several major early versions of Hindu philosophies such as Samkhya, Nyaya, Mimamsa along with sub-schools of Yoga and Vedanta, as well as non-Vedic schools such as Jainism and Buddhism, were similarly non-theistic. Kaṇāda
1380-608: Is not merely ignorance to Naiyyayikas, it includes delusion. Correct knowledge is discovering and overcoming one's delusions, and understanding true nature of soul, self and reality. Naiyyayika scholars approached philosophy as a form of direct realism , stating that anything that really exists is in principle humanly knowable. To them, correct knowledge and understanding is different from simple, reflexive cognition; it requires Anuvyavasaya (अनुव्यवसाय, cross-examination of cognition, reflective cognition of what one thinks one knows). An influential collection of texts on logic and reason
1440-532: Is one of the six orthodox ( Āstika ) schools of Hindu philosophy . Nyāya's most significant contributions to Indian philosophy were systematic development of the theory of logic, methodology, and its treatises on epistemology . Nyāya school's epistemology accepts four out of six Pramanas as reliable means of gaining knowledge – Pratyakṣa (perception), Anumāṇa (inference), Upamāna (comparison and analogy) and Śabda (word, testimony of past or present reliable experts). In its metaphysics , Nyāya school
1500-403: Is only one individual (soul) is known from the absence of particularity when it comes to the emergence of an understanding of happiness and suffering, (whereas) a multiplicity of individuals is inferred from their perseverance in dharma, and from the strength of their teaching. – Vaisheshika Sutras 3.16-18 The true being is eternal, having no cause. Its indicator is its effect. The presence of
1560-410: Is perceived without a name, we have indeterminate perception. Jayanta Bhatta says that indeterminate perception apprehends substance, qualities and actions and universals as separate and indistinct, without any association with any names, whereas determinate perception apprehends them all together with a name. There is yet another stage called Pratyabhijñā , when one is able to re-recognise something on
1620-512: Is the Nyāya Sūtras , attributed to Aksapada Gautama , variously estimated to have been composed between 6th-century BCE and 2nd-century CE. Nyāya school shares some of its methodology and human suffering foundations with Buddhism ; however, a key difference between the two is that Buddhism believes that there is neither a soul nor self; Nyāya school like some other schools of Hinduism such as Dvaita and Viśiṣṭādvaita believes that there
1680-624: Is there etymologically identical with "nigama" the conclusion of a syllogism. Nyaya is related to several other concepts and words used in Indian philosophies: Hetu-vidya (science of causes), Anviksiki (science of inquiry, systematic philosophy), Pramana-sastra (epistemology, science of correct knowledge), Tattva-sastra (science of categories), Tarka-vidya (science of reasoning, innovation, synthesis), Vadartha (science of discussion) and Phakkika-sastra (science of uncovering sophism, fraud, error, finding fakes). Some of these subsume or deploy
1740-457: Is unclear, although Nasadiya hymns of Book 10 Chapter 129 of Rigveda recite its spiritual questions in logical propositions. In early centuries BCE, states Clooney , the early Nyāya scholars began compiling the science of rational, coherent inquiry and pursuit of knowledge. By the 2nd century CE, Aksapada Gautama had composed Nyāya Sūtras , a foundational text for Nyāya, that primarily discusses logic, methodology and epistemology. Gautama
1800-591: The Nyaya school of Hindu philosophy. Kaṇāda's system speaks of six properties ( padārthas ) that are nameable and knowable. He claims that these are sufficient to describe everything in the universe, including observers. These six categories are dravya (substance), guna (quality), karma (action/ motion), samanya (generality/ commonness), visesa (particular), and samavaya (inherence). There are nine classes of substances (dravya), some of which are atomic, some non-atomic, and others that are all-pervasive. The ideas of Kaṇāda span
1860-528: The Nyaya Sutras to spiritual questions. While the early Nyaya scholars published little to no analysis on whether supernatural power or God exists, they did apply their insights into reason and reliable means to knowledge to the questions of nature of existence, spirituality, happiness and moksha . Later Nyāya scholars, such as Udayana , examined various arguments on theism and attempted to prove existence of God. Other Nyāya scholars offered arguments to disprove
Kanada - Misplaced Pages Continue
1920-680: The 1st and 2nd century CE, such as the Mahavibhas and Jnanaprasthana from the Kushan Empire , quote and comment on Kaṇāda's doctrines. His ideas are also mentioned in Buddhist texts attributed to Aśvaghoṣa of the same period. In Jainism literature, he is referred as Sad-uluka , which means "the Uluka who propounded the doctrine of six categories". His Vaisheshika philosophy similarly appears with alternate names, such as "Aulukya philosophy" derived from
1980-671: The Sanskrit text Vaiśeṣika Sūtra . His text is also known as Kaṇāda Sutras , or " Aphorisms of Kaṇāda". The school founded by Kaṇāda explains the creation and existence of the universe by proposing an atomistic theory, applying logic and realism, and is one of the earliest known systematic realist ontology in human history. Kaṇāda suggested that everything can be subdivided, but this subdivision cannot go on forever, and there must be smallest entities ( paramanu ) that cannot be divided, that are eternal, that aggregate in different ways to yield complex substances and bodies with unique identity,
2040-519: The Supreme Soul). Evidence available suggests that early Nyāya scholars were non-theistic or atheists. Later, and over time, Nyāya scholars tried to apply some of their epistemological insights and methodology to the question: does God exist? Some offered arguments against and some in favor. In Nyāya Sūtra's Book 4, Chapter 1, verses 19–21, postulates God exists, states a consequence, then presents contrary evidence, and from contradiction concludes that
2100-459: The atom must be spherical since it should be the same in all dimensions. He asserts that all substances are composed of four types of atoms, two of which have mass and two are massless. Kaṇāda presents his work within a larger moral framework by defining Dharma as that which brings about material progress and highest good. He follows this Sutra with another that asserts that the Vedas have gained respect because they teach such Dharma, and something
2160-454: The basis of memory. Anumāna (inference) is one of the most important contributions of the Nyāya. It can be of two types: inference for oneself ( Svarthanumana , where one does not need any formal procedure, and at the most the last three of their 5 steps), and inference for others ( Parathanumana , which requires a systematic methodology of 5 steps). Inference can also be classified into 3 types: Purvavat (inferring an unperceived effect from
2220-480: The construction of a substantialist, realist ontology that the world has ever seen. It provides an extended critique of event-ontologies and idealist metaphysics. (...) This ontology is Platonistic, realistic, but neither exclusively physicalistic nor phenomenalistic. — Karl Potter , The Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies A cause is defined as an unconditional and invariable antecedent of an effect and an effect as an unconditional and invariable consequent of
2280-403: The difference between "Apara" and "Para" knowledge, where "Apara" represents normal associational knowledge whereas "Para" represents deeper subjective knowledge. Vaisheshika Darshana Dharma is that through which there is the accomplishment of rising to the unsurpassed good. Because it is an exposition of that, it has the authority of Veda . – Vaisheshika Sutras 1.1-2 (...) That there
2340-424: The effect arises from the presence of its cause. – Vaisheshika Sutras 4.1-3 —Kaṇāda, Translated by John Wells Kaṇāda proposes that paramanu ( atom ) is an indestructible particle of matter. The atom is indivisible because it is a state at which no measurement can be attributed. He used invariance arguments to determine properties of the atoms. He also stated that anu can have two states—absolute rest and
2400-412: The example of a traveller who has never visited lands or islands with endemic population of wildlife. He or she is told, by someone who has been there, that in those lands you see an animal that sort of looks like a cow, grazes like cow but is different from a cow in such and such way. Such use of analogy and comparison is, state the Indian epistemologists, a valid means of conditional knowledge, as it helps
2460-524: The example shown: In Nyāya terminology for this example, the hill would be the paksha (minor term), the fire is the sādhya (major term), the smoke is hetu , and the relationship between the smoke and the fire is vyapti (middle term). Hetu further has five characteristics The fallacies in Anumana ( hetvābhasa ) may occur due to the following Upamāna (उपमान) means comparison and analogy. Upamāna , states Lochtefeld, may be explained with
Kanada - Misplaced Pages Continue
2520-403: The existence of God, sutra IV.1.21 is seen as a criticism of the "existence of God and theism postulate". The context of the above verses includes various efficient causes. Nyāya Sūtra verses IV.1.22 to IV.1.24, for example, examine the hypothesis that "random chance" explains the world, after these Indian scholars had rejected God as the efficient cause. In Nyayakusumanjali , Udayana gives
2580-540: The existence of God. The most important contribution made by the Nyāya school to Hindu thought has been its treatises on epistemology and system of logic that, subsequently, has been adopted by the majority of the other Indian schools. The Nyāya metaphysics recognizes sixteen padarthas or categories and includes all six (or seven) categories of the Vaisheshika in the second one of them, called prameya . These sixteen categories are: According to Matthew Dasti and Stephen Phillips, it may be useful to interpret
2640-403: The following nine arguments to prove the existence of creative God and also refutes the existing objections and questions by atheistic systems of Carvaka, Mimamsa, Buddhists, Jains and Samkhya: Naiyyayikas characterize Ishvara as absent of adharma , false knowledge, and error; and possessing dharma , right knowledge, and equanimity. Additionally, Ishvara is omnipotent and acts in a way that
2700-407: The idea of the subdivision is carried further to analytical categories as well, which explains its affinity with Nyaya . In the fifth chapter of Vaisheshika Sutra, Kaṇāda mentions various empirical observations and natural phenomena such as the falling of objects to the ground, rising of fire and heat upwards, the growth of grass upwards, the nature of rainfall and thunderstorms, the flow of liquids,
2760-444: The intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kanada&oldid=1244441486 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Ka%E1%B9%87%C4%81da Kaṇāda ( Sanskrit : कणाद , IAST : Kaṇāda ), also known as Ulūka, Kashyapa, Kaṇabhaksha, Kaṇabhuj
2820-415: The modern era in multiple versions and the discovery of newer manuscripts in different parts of India by Thakur in 1957 and Jambuvijayaji in 1961, followed by critical edition studies, suggest that the text attributed to Kaṇāda was systematized and finalized sometime between 200 BCE and the start of the common era, with the possibility that its key doctrines may be much older. Multiple Hindu texts dated to
2880-447: The movement towards a magnet among many others, asks why these things happen, then attempts to integrate his observations with his theories on atoms, molecules, and their interaction. He classifies observed events into two: those caused by volition, and those caused by subject-object conjunctions. His idea of the observer, that is the subject, being different from objective reality is completely consistent with Vedanta , which speaks of
2940-471: The nickname Uluka (literally owl, or grain eater in the night). Kaṇāda was influential in Indian philosophies appearing in various texts by dictators, philosophers, and more, such as Kashyapa, Uluka, Kananda, Kanabhuk among others. Physics is central to Kaṇāda's assertion that all that is knowable is based on motion. His ascribing centrality to physics in the understanding of the universe also follows from his invariance principles. For example, he says that
3000-454: The postulate must be invalid. The Lord is the cause, since we see that human action lacks results. This is not so since, as a matter of fact, no result is accomplished without human action. Since this is efficacious, the reason lacks force. A literal interpretation of the three verses suggests that Nyāya school rejected the need for a God for the efficacy of human activity. Since human action and results do not require assumption or need of
3060-476: The source is important, and legitimate knowledge can only come from the Sabda of reliable sources. The disagreement between the schools of Hinduism has been on how to establish reliability. Some schools, such as Carvaka , state that this is never possible, and therefore Sabda is not a proper pramana . Other schools debate means to establish reliability. Testimony can be of two types, Vaidika ( Vedic ), which are
SECTION 50
#17328589737213120-512: The tools of Nyaya . Then was not non-existent nor existent: there was no realm of air, no sky beyond it. What covered in, and where? and what gave shelter? Was water there, unfathomed depth of water? ... Who really knows? Who will here proclaim it? Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation? The gods came after this world's production, Who knows then whence it first came into being?" Rig Veda , Creation....10:129–1, 10:129–6 The historical development of Nyāya school
3180-532: The traveller identify the new animal later. The subject of comparison is formally called upameyam , the object of comparison is called upamānam , while the attribute(s) are identified as sāmānya . Thus, explains Monier Williams , if a boy says "her face is like the moon in charmingness", "her face" is upameyam , the moon is upamānam , and charmingness is sāmānya . The 7th century text Bhaṭṭikāvya in verses 10.28 through 10.63 discusses many types of comparisons and analogies, identifying when this epistemic method
3240-429: The way" tracing its Sanskrit etymology. In the theory of logic, and Indian texts discussing it, the term also refers to an argument consisting of an enthymeme or sometimes for any syllogism . In philosophical context, Nyaya encompasses propriety, logic and method. Panini , revered Sanskrit grammarian, derives the " Nyaya " from the root "i" which conveys the same meaning as "gam" – to go. " Nyaya " signifying logic
3300-470: The word jnana as cognition rather than knowledge when studying the Nyāya system. Nyaya posits that there exists a self distinct from the mind, which is distinct from the body. The self is a nonphysical substance. It only possesses consciousness when the sensory and mental faculties function. The Nyāya school of Hinduism developed and refined many treatises on epistemology that widely influenced other schools of Hinduism. In Nyaya philosophy, knowledge
3360-409: The words of the four sacred Vedas, and Laukika , or words and writings of trustworthy human beings. Vaidika testimony is preferred over Laukika testimony. Laukika-sourced knowledge must be questioned and revised as more trustworthy knowledge becomes available. In Nyaya philosophy, direct realism asserts that our cognitions are informational states revealing external objects. According to Nyaya,
3420-417: The world consists of stable, three-dimensional objects, and their system of categories accurately mirrors reality's structure. Nyaya philosophy emphasizes the importance of universals, qualities, and relations in understanding the organization of the world. These foundational elements are believed to play essential roles in determining the phenomenological , causal, and logical organization of the world, playing
3480-571: Was among the sages of India who believed in man's potential to understand existence and reach moksha on his own, without God, a notion of ancient Indians summarized by Nietzsche as the belief that "with piety and knowledge of the Veda, nothing is impossible". The text states: Several traits of substances ( dravya ) are given as colour, taste, smell, touch, number, size, the separate, coupling and uncoupling, priority and posterity, comprehension, pleasure and pain, attraction and revulsion, and wishes. Thus
3540-434: Was an ancient Indian natural scientist and philosopher who founded the Vaisheshika school of Indian philosophy that also represents the earliest Indian physics . Estimated to have lived sometime between 6th century to 2nd century BCE, little is known about his life. His traditional name "Kaṇāda" means "atom eater", and he is known for developing the foundations of an atomistic approach to physics and philosophy in
3600-457: Was based on direct experience of reality by eyes, ears, nose, touch and taste. Extraordinary perception included yogaja or pratibha (intuition), samanyalaksanapratyaksa (a form of induction from perceived specifics to a universal), and jnanalaksanapratyaksa (a form of perception of prior processes and previous states of a 'topic of study' by observing its current state). The Naiyyayika maintains two modes or stages in perception. The first
#720279