Misplaced Pages

#442557

53-536: It was a phonemic orthography , developed in Kyiv in the 1870s by a group of cultural activists led by Pavlo Zhytetsky and including Drahomanov, for the compilation of a Ukrainian dictionary. The 1876 Ems Ukaz banned Ukrainian-language publications and public performances in the Russian Empire, so cultural activity was forced to move abroad before this reform had a chance to be published. Zhytetsky named this alphabet

106-634: A binary relation pairing elements of set X with elements of set Y to be a bijection, four properties must hold: Satisfying properties (1) and (2) means that a pairing is a function with domain X . It is more common to see properties (1) and (2) written as a single statement: Every element of X is paired with exactly one element of Y . Functions which satisfy property (3) are said to be " onto Y " and are called surjections (or surjective functions ). Functions which satisfy property (4) are said to be " one-to-one functions " and are called injections (or injective functions ). With this terminology,

159-621: A bijection between them. More generally, two sets are said to have the same cardinal number if there exists a bijection between them. A bijective function from a set to itself is also called a permutation , and the set of all permutations of a set forms its symmetric group . Some bijections with further properties have received specific names, which include automorphisms , isomorphisms , homeomorphisms , diffeomorphisms , permutation groups , and most geometric transformations . Galois correspondences are bijections between sets of mathematical objects of apparently very different nature. For

212-425: A bijection is a relation between two sets such that each element of either set is paired with exactly one element of the other set. A function is bijective if and only if it is invertible ; that is, a function f : X → Y {\displaystyle f:X\to Y} is bijective if and only if there is a function g : Y → X , {\displaystyle g:Y\to X,}

265-417: A bijection is a function which is both a surjection and an injection, or using other words, a bijection is a function which is both "one-to-one" and "onto". Consider the batting line-up of a baseball or cricket team (or any list of all the players of any sports team where every player holds a specific spot in a line-up). The set X will be the players on the team (of size nine in the case of baseball) and

318-426: A complete one-to-one correspondence ( bijection ) between the graphemes (letters) and the phonemes of the language, and each phoneme would invariably be represented by its corresponding grapheme. So the spelling of a word would unambiguously and transparently indicate its pronunciation, and conversely, a speaker knowing the pronunciation of a word would be able to infer its spelling without any doubt. That ideal situation

371-484: A fair degree of accuracy. The phoneme-to-letter correspondence, on the other hand, is often low and a sequence of sounds may have multiple ways of being spelt, often with different meanings. Orthographies such as those of German , Hungarian (mainly phonemic with the exception ly , j representing the same sound, but consonant and vowel length are not always accurate and various spellings reflect etymology, not pronunciation), Portuguese , and modern Greek (written with

424-405: A function f : X → Y is bijective if and only if it satisfies the condition Continuing with the baseball batting line-up example, the function that is being defined takes as input the name of one of the players and outputs the position of that player in the batting order. Since this function is a bijection, it has an inverse function which takes as input a position in the batting order and outputs

477-453: A function, but properties (3) and (4) of a bijection say that this inverse relation is a function with domain Y . Moreover, properties (1) and (2) then say that this inverse function is a surjection and an injection, that is, the inverse function exists and is also a bijection. Functions that have inverse functions are said to be invertible . A function is invertible if and only if it is a bijection. Stated in concise mathematical notation,

530-724: A high grapheme-to-phoneme and phoneme-to-grapheme correspondence (excluding exceptions due to loan words and assimilation) include: Many otherwise phonemic orthographies are slightly defective, see the page Defective script § Latin script . The graphemes b and v represent the same phoneme in all varieties of Spanish (except in Valencia), while in the Spanish of the Americas, /s/ can be represented by graphemes s , c , or z . Modern Indo-Aryan languages like Hindi , Punjabi , Gujarati , Maithili and several others feature schwa deletion , where

583-434: A phonemic orthography such a system would need periodic updating, as has been attempted by various language regulators and proposed by other spelling reformers . Sometimes the pronunciation of a word changes to match its spelling; this is called a spelling pronunciation . This is most common with loanwords, but occasionally occurs in the case of established native words too. In some English personal names and place names,

SECTION 10

#1732858499443

636-409: A phonemic orthography, allophones will usually be represented by the same grapheme, a purely phonetic script would demand that phonetically distinct allophones be distinguished. To take an example from American English: the /t/ sound in the words "table" and "cat" would, in a phonemic orthography, be written with the same character; however, a strictly phonetic script would make a distinction between

689-532: Is a slightly different case where the same digraph is used for two different single phonemes. ai versus aï in French This is often due to the use of an alphabet that was originally used for a different language (the Latin alphabet in these examples) and so does not have single letters available for all the phonemes used in the current language (although some orthographies use devices such as diacritics to increase

742-610: Is affected by adjacent sounds in neighboring words (written Sanskrit and other Indian languages , however, reflect such changes). A language may also use different sets of symbols or different rules for distinct sets of vocabulary items such as the Japanese hiragana and katakana syllabaries (and the different treatment in English orthography of words derived from Latin and Greek). Alphabetic orthographies often have features that are morphophonemic rather than purely phonemic. This means that

795-487: Is alphabetic but highly nonphonemic. In less formally precise terms, a language with a highly phonemic orthography may be described as having regular spelling or phonetic spelling . Another terminology is that of deep and shallow orthographies , in which the depth of an orthography is the degree to which it diverges from being truly phonemic. The concept can also be applied to nonalphabetic writing systems like syllabaries . In an ideal phonemic orthography, there would be

848-538: Is an orthography (system for writing a language ) in which the graphemes (written symbols) correspond consistently to the language's phonemes (the smallest units of speech that can differentiate words), or more generally to the language's diaphonemes . Natural languages rarely have perfectly phonemic orthographies; a high degree of grapheme–phoneme correspondence can be expected in orthographies based on alphabetic writing systems, but they differ in how complete this correspondence is. English orthography , for example,

901-468: Is any relation R (which turns out to be a partial function) with the property that R is the graph of a bijection f : A′ → B′ , where A′ is a subset of A and B′ is a subset of B . When the partial bijection is on the same set, it is sometimes called a one-to-one partial transformation . An example is the Möbius transformation simply defined on the complex plane, rather than its completion to

954-490: Is highly non-phonemic. The irregularity of English spelling arises partly because the Great Vowel Shift occurred after the orthography was established; partly because English has acquired a large number of loanwords at different times, retaining their original spelling at varying levels; and partly because the regularisation of the spelling (moving away from the situation in which many different spellings were acceptable for

1007-477: Is one that is not capable of representing all the phonemes or phonemic distinctions in a language. An example of such a deficiency in English orthography is the lack of distinction between the voiced and voiceless "th" phonemes ( / ð / and / θ / , respectively), occurring in words like this / ˈ ð ɪ s / (voiced) and thin / ˈ θ ɪ n / (voiceless) respectively, with both written ⟨th⟩ . Languages whose current orthographies have

1060-423: Is rare but exists in a few languages. There are two distinct types of deviation from the phonemic ideal. In the first case, the exact one-to-one correspondence may be lost (for example, some phoneme may be represented by a digraph instead of a single letter), but the "regularity" is retained: there is still an algorithm (but a more complex one) for predicting the spelling from the pronunciation and vice versa. In

1113-402: Is that a (proper) partial function is already undefined for a portion of its domain; thus there is no compelling reason to constrain its inverse to be a total function , i.e. defined everywhere on its domain. The set of all partial bijections on a given base set is called the symmetric inverse semigroup . Another way of defining the same notion is to say that a partial bijection from A to B

SECTION 20

#1732858499443

1166-499: Is the written language rather than the spoken language, so the phonemes represent the graphemes, and it is unimportant how the word is pronounced. Moreover, the sounds which literate people perceive being heard in a word are significantly influenced by the actual spelling of the word. Sometimes, countries have the written language undergo a spelling reform to realign the writing with the contemporary spoken language. These can range from simple spelling changes and word forms to switching

1219-481: The Greek alphabet ), as well as Korean hangul , are sometimes considered to be of intermediate depth (for example they include many morphophonemic features, as described above). Similarly to French, it is much easier to infer the pronunciation of a German word from its spelling than vice versa. For example, for speakers who merge /eː/ and /ɛː/, the phoneme /eː/ may be spelt e , ee , eh , ä or äh . English orthography

1272-927: The Hertsehovynka , after the influence of the recent Serbian orthography of Vuk Karadžić , from Herzegovina . But Drahomanov first used it in a publication ( Hromada , Geneva 1878), and it came to be popularly referred to as the Drahomanivka . It was used in Drahomanov's publications and personal correspondence, as well as in publications in Western Ukraine (Austro-Hungarian Galicia ) by Drahomanov's colleagues Ivan Franko and Mykhailo Pavlyk ( Hromadskyi Druh, Dzvin, and Molot , Lviv 1878). But these publications were opposed by conservative Ukrainian cultural factions (the Old Ruthenians and Russophiles ) and persecuted by

1325-471: The aspirated "t" in "table", the flap in "butter", the unaspirated "t" in "stop" and the glottalized "t" in "cat" (not all these allophones exist in all English dialects ). In other words, the sound that most English speakers think of as /t/ is really a group of sounds, all pronounced slightly differently depending on where they occur in a word. A perfect phonemic orthography has one letter per group of sounds (phoneme), with different letters only where

1378-540: The inverse of f , such that each of the two ways for composing the two functions produces an identity function : g ( f ( x ) ) = x {\displaystyle g(f(x))=x} for each x {\displaystyle x} in X {\displaystyle X} and f ( g ( y ) ) = y {\displaystyle f(g(y))=y} for each y {\displaystyle y} in Y . {\displaystyle Y.} For example,

1431-430: The multiplication by two defines a bijection from the integers to the even numbers , which has the division by two as its inverse function. A function is bijective if and only if it is both injective (or one-to-one )—meaning that each element in the codomain is mapped from at most one element of the domain—and surjective (or onto )—meaning that each element of the codomain is mapped from at least one element of

1484-664: The Polish-dominated Galician authorities, and the orthography fell into obscurity. The Drahomanivka was based on the phonemic principle , with each letter representing exactly one Ukrainian phoneme (one meaningful unit of sound). The letter ⟨щ⟩ , which represents the sequence [ʃtʃ] , was replaced by ⟨шч⟩ . Palatalization was represented by the soft sign ⟨ь⟩ , so after softened consonants ⟨я, є, ю⟩ were replaced with ⟨ьа, ье, ьу⟩ . The semivowel [j] , written ⟨й⟩ ,

1537-413: The category Grp of groups , the morphisms must be homomorphisms since they must preserve the group structure, so the isomorphisms are group isomorphisms which are bijective homomorphisms. The notion of one-to-one correspondence generalizes to partial functions , where they are called partial bijections , although partial bijections are only required to be injective. The reason for this relaxation

1590-404: The composition g ∘ f {\displaystyle g\,\circ \,f} of two functions is bijective, it only follows that f is injective and g is surjective . If X and Y are finite sets , then there exists a bijection between the two sets X and Y if and only if X and Y have the same number of elements. Indeed, in axiomatic set theory , this is taken as

1643-419: The definition of "same number of elements" ( equinumerosity ), and generalising this definition to infinite sets leads to the concept of cardinal number , a way to distinguish the various sizes of infinite sets. Bijections are precisely the isomorphisms in the category Set of sets and set functions. However, the bijections are not always the isomorphisms for more complex categories. For example, in

Drahomanivka - Misplaced Pages Continue

1696-432: The domain. The term one-to-one correspondence must not be confused with one-to-one function , which means injective but not necessarily surjective. The elementary operation of counting establishes a bijection from some finite set to the first natural numbers (1, 2, 3, ...) , up to the number of elements in the counted set. It results that two finite sets have the same number of elements if and only if there exists

1749-763: The entire writing system itself, as when Turkey switched from the Arabic alphabet to the Latin -based Turkish alphabet . Methods for phonetic transcription such as the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) aim to describe pronunciation in a standard form. They are often used to solve ambiguities in the spelling of written language. They may also be used to write languages with no previous written form. Systems like IPA can be used for phonemic representation or for showing more detailed phonetic information (see Narrow vs. broad transcription ). Phonemic orthographies are different from phonetic transcription; whereas in

1802-437: The implicit default vowel is suppressed without being explicitly marked as such. Others, like Marathi , do not have a high grapheme-to-phoneme correspondence for vowel lengths. Bengali , despite having a slightly shallow orthography, has a deeper orthography than its Indo-Aryan cousins as it features silent consonants at places. Moreover, due to sound mergers, the same phonemes are often represented by different graphemes. On

1855-451: The number of available letters). Pronunciation and spelling do not always correspond in a predictable way In Bengali, the letters, 'শ', 'ষ', and ' স, correspond to the same sound / ʃ /. Moreover, consonant clusters , 'স্ব', 'স্য' , 'শ্ব ', 'শ্ম', 'শ্য', 'ষ্ম ', 'ষ্য', also often have the same pronunciation, / ʃ / or / ʃ ʃ /. Most orthographies do not reflect the changes in pronunciation known as sandhi in which pronunciation

1908-423: The other hand, Assamese does not have retroflex consonants and so, the characters for retroflex consonants ( like ট ('t') and ড ('d') ) that it has inherited in its script from the ancient Brahmi script are also pronounced like their dental versions. Moreover, in both Bengali and Assamese do not make any distinctions in vowel length. Thus the letters like ই ('i') and ঈ ('i:') as well as উ ('u') and ঊ ('u:') have

1961-598: The player who will be batting in that position. The composition g ∘ f {\displaystyle g\,\circ \,f} of two bijections f : X → Y and g : Y → Z is a bijection, whose inverse is given by g ∘ f {\displaystyle g\,\circ \,f} is ( g ∘ f ) − 1 = ( f − 1 ) ∘ ( g − 1 ) {\displaystyle (g\,\circ \,f)^{-1}\;=\;(f^{-1})\,\circ \,(g^{-1})} . Conversely, if

2014-419: The relationship between the spelling of the name and its pronunciation is so distant that associations between phonemes and graphemes cannot be readily identified. Moreover, in many other words, the pronunciation has subsequently evolved from a fixed spelling, so that it has to be said that the phonemes represent the graphemes rather than vice versa. And in much technical jargon, the primary medium of communication

2067-425: The same position in the list. In a classroom there are a certain number of seats. A group of students enter the room and the instructor asks them to be seated. After a quick look around the room, the instructor declares that there is a bijection between the set of students and the set of seats, where each student is paired with the seat they are sitting in. What the instructor observed in order to reach this conclusion

2120-435: The same pronunciations as 'i' and 'u' respectively. This leads to the existence of many homophones (words with same pronunciations but different spellings and meanings) in these languages. French , with its silent letters and its heavy use of nasal vowels and elision , may seem to lack much correspondence between spelling and pronunciation, but its rules on pronunciation, though complex, are consistent and predictable with

2173-552: The same word) happened arbitrarily over a period without any central plan. However even English has general, albeit complex, rules that predict pronunciation from spelling, and several of these rules are successful most of the time; rules to predict spelling from the pronunciation have a higher failure rate. Most constructed languages such as Esperanto and Lojban have mostly phonemic orthographies. The syllabary systems of Japanese ( hiragana and katakana ) are examples of almost perfectly shallow orthography – exceptions include

Drahomanivka - Misplaced Pages Continue

2226-572: The second case, true irregularity is introduced, as certain words come to be spelled and pronounced according to different rules from others, and prediction of spelling from pronunciation and vice versa is no longer possible. Pronunciation and spelling still correspond in a predictable way Examples: sch versus s-ch in Romansch ng versus n + g in Welsh ch versus çh in Manx Gaelic : this

2279-479: The set Y will be the positions in the batting order (1st, 2nd, 3rd, etc.) The "pairing" is given by which player is in what position in this order. Property (1) is satisfied since each player is somewhere in the list. Property (2) is satisfied since no player bats in two (or more) positions in the order. Property (3) says that for each position in the order, there is some player batting in that position and property (4) states that two or more players are never batting in

2332-508: The sounds distinguish words (so "bed" is spelled differently from "bet"). A narrow phonetic transcription represents phones , the sounds humans are capable of producing, many of which will often be grouped together as a single phoneme in any given natural language, though the groupings vary across languages. English, for example, does not distinguish between aspirated and unaspirated consonants, but other languages, like Korean , Bengali and Hindi do. The sounds of speech of all languages of

2385-437: The spelling reflects to some extent the underlying morphological structure of the words, not only their pronunciation. Hence different forms of a morpheme (minimum meaningful unit of language) are often spelt identically or similarly in spite of differences in their pronunciation. That is often for historical reasons; the morphophonemic spelling reflects a previous pronunciation from before historical sound changes that caused

2438-645: The tested orthographies, Chinese and French orthographies, followed by English and Russian, are the most opaque regarding writing (i.e. phonemes to graphemes direction) and English, followed by Dutch, is the most opaque regarding reading (i.e. graphemes to phonemes direction); Esperanto, Arabic, Finnish, Korean, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish are very shallow both to read and to write; Italian is shallow to read and very shallow to write, Breton, German, Portuguese and Spanish are shallow to read and to write. With time, pronunciations change and spellings become out of date, as has happened to English and French . In order to maintain

2491-481: The use of Drahomanivka was presented on the 2003 Ukrainian twenty- hryvnia banknote. It shows a fragment of Ivan Franko 's poem "Veselka", written in the Drahomanivka, beside the poet's portrait: Земле, моја всеплодьучаја мати! Сили, шчо в твојіј движесь глубині, Краплоу, шчоб в боју сміліјше стојати , дај і міні! Phonemic orthography A phonemic orthography

2544-514: The use of ぢ di and づ du (rather than じ ji and ず zu , their pronunciation in standard Tokyo dialect ), when the character is a voicing of an underlying ち or つ. That is from the rendaku sound change combined with the yotsugana merger of formally different morae. The Russian orthography is also mostly morphophonemic, because it does not reflect vowel reduction, consonant assimilation and final-obstruent devoicing. Also, some consonant combinations have silent consonants. A defective orthography

2597-422: The use of ぢ and づ ( discussed above ) and the use of は, を, and へ to represent the sounds わ, お, and え, as relics of historical kana usage . There is also no indication of pitch accent, which results in homography of words like 箸 and 橋 (はし in hiragana), which are distinguished in speech. Xavier Marjou uses an artificial neural network to rank 17 orthographies according to their level of Orthographic depth . Among

2650-410: The variation in pronunciation of a given morpheme. Such spellings can assist in the recognition of words when reading. Some examples of morphophonemic features in orthography are described below. Korean hangul has changed over the centuries from a highly phonemic to a largely morphophonemic orthography. Japanese kana are almost completely phonemic but have a few morphophonemic aspects, notably in

2703-414: The world can be written by a rather small universal phonetic alphabet. A standard for this is the International Phonetic Alphabet . Bijection A bijection , bijective function , or one-to-one correspondence between two mathematical sets is a function such that each element of the second set (the codomain ) is the image of exactly one element of the first set (the domain ). Equivalently,

SECTION 50

#1732858499443

2756-487: Was replaced with the Latin ⟨j⟩ ; the sequences [jɑ, jɛ, ju, ji] were to be written ⟨ја, је, ју, јі⟩ instead of with the iotated vowels ⟨я, є, ю, ї⟩ . Due to these changes the hard sign —then written ⟨ъ⟩ but later as an apostrophe ⟨'⟩ —was superfluous and to be abandoned. The verb ending ‑ться was written ‑тцьа . Examples: An example of

2809-428: Was that: The instructor was able to conclude that there were just as many seats as there were students, without having to count either set. A bijection f with domain X (indicated by f : X → Y in functional notation ) also defines a converse relation starting in Y and going to X (by turning the arrows around). The process of "turning the arrows around" for an arbitrary function does not, in general , yield

#442557