30°26′17″N 84°17′01″W / 30.438092°N 84.283585°W / 30.438092; -84.283585
87-398: The Supreme Court of Florida is the highest court in the U.S. state of Florida . It consists of seven justices—one of whom serves as Chief Justice. Six members are chosen from six districts around the state to foster geographic diversity, and one is selected at large. The justices are appointed by the governor to set terms, which do not exceed six years. Immediately after appointment,
174-598: A case involves federal statutory or constitutional law, review of state supreme court decisions may be sought by way of a petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States . The U.S. Supreme Court is the only federal court that has jurisdiction over direct appeals from state court decisions, although other federal courts are sometimes allowed "collateral review" of state cases in specific situations, for example regarding individuals on death row. As
261-517: A constitutional amendment passed by referendum in November 2018, mandatory retirement for Florida Supreme Court justices occurs upon reaching age 75. The Florida Constitution states, "No justice or judge shall serve after attaining the age of seventy-five years except upon temporary assignment." They thus must retire on the date of their 75th birthdays if still in office at that time. Justices may be removed by one of two methods. They can be disciplined upon
348-407: A constitutional provision is to maintain decisional uniformity. The power is coined as “discretionary” because a court may choose whether to accept or deny the petitioner's appeal. Moreover, discretionary jurisdiction is reactive rather than proactive. In other words, appellate courts do not search for cases review. Rather the court's exercise of discretion is in response to a petitioner's appeal of
435-745: A first person account of the controversy, Inside Bush v. Gore , published in 2013. The library of the Florida Supreme Court has been in existence since Florida was granted statehood in 1845. While it is the oldest state-supported library in Florida, its main purpose at the start was to serve the Supreme court. This purpose continues today, with the addition of serving the Office of the State Courts Administrator and lower Florida courts. When it began,
522-616: A law passed by the Florida Legislature that had created the first statewide education voucher program in the United States. That same year in Engle v. Liggett Group, it also ordered decertification of a class action lawsuit against big tobacco companies that effectively reversed the largest punitive damage jury award, $ 145 billion, in U.S. history. In 2013, Governor Rick Scott signed the Timely Justice Act (HB 7101) which overhauled
609-531: A litigant is petitioning the court for discretionary review, the litigant must file a notice in the district court w/in 30 days of "a notice to invoke discretionary jurisdiction. Wells v. State, 132 So. 3d 1110 (2014) . This petitioner must file a notice to invoke within 10 days of filing the notice petitioner must submit a jurisdictional brief to the Supreme Court. If subject to the State's Supreme Court's jurisdiction.
696-519: A lower court's decision or in a motion for rehearing made to the intermediate [appellate] court . Moreover, the highest [supreme] court's exercise of discretion is similar to the intermediate court, except that a supreme court will grant review at a much smaller percentage. For example, the United States Supreme Court merely grants review for five percent of its requests for discretionary review. Generally, there are three tiers of court at
783-483: A new law requiring a unanimous jury. In the 2000 presidential election controversy , the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the Florida Supreme Court after it had ordered a statewide recount. Notably, arguments before the Florida Supreme Court in the 2000 presidential election cases were the first appellate court proceedings in history broadcast live in their entirety on major television networks in
870-570: A new statute to comply with the judgement in March 2016, changing the sentencing method to require a 10-juror supermajority for a sentence of death with a life sentence as the alternative. This new sentencing scheme was struck down by the Florida Supreme Court in a ruling 5–2 in October 2016, which held that a death sentence must be issued by a unanimous jury. The United States Supreme Court later left this decision undisturbed. Governor Scott in early 2017 signed
957-451: A panel of five justices, one of whom oversees the preparation of a memorandum analyzing whether there is a basis for the court's exercise of discretionary jurisdiction, will review the case. If four justices agree on a jurisdictional disposition of the case—based on the four instances listed above—the parties are notified of the court's decision, and the case proceeds accordingly. In a 2011 hearing regarding two concurrent legal challenges to
SECTION 10
#17328482557581044-449: A rotating basis from presiding judges of Florida's district courts of appeal. They usually sit only for a single case. Unlike the U.S. Supreme Court, the term "associate justice" is never used to describe the sitting Florida justices. The Court is the final arbiter of state law of Florida, and its decisions are binding authority for all other Florida state courts , as well as for federal courts when they apply Florida law. In most instances,
1131-623: A salary of $ 227,218. After Florida's entrance into the union in 1845, and the ratification of the state's first Constitution, the Supreme Court of the State of Florida was born. It is the successor to the Florida Territorial Court of Appeals and the court system that existed under Spain prior to the acquisition of Florida through the Adams-Onis Treaty . Though the constitution created a Supreme Court, it vested it with no judges and little power. Florida Circuit court judges served in
1218-426: A small courthouse reserved for its exclusive use. State supreme courts normally require a courtroom for oral argument, private chambers for all justices, a conference room, offices for law clerks and other support staff, a law library , and a lobby with a filing window where the court clerk can accept filings and release new decisions in the form of "slip opinions" (that is, in looseleaf format held together only by
1305-451: A staple). Because state supreme courts generally hear only appeals, some courts have names which directly indicate their function – in the state of New York and in the District of Columbia , the highest court is called the "Court of Appeals". In New York, the " Supreme Court " is the trial court of general unlimited jurisdiction and the intermediate appellate court is called
1392-428: A state supreme court, like most appellate tribunals, is exclusively for hearing appeals of legal issues. Although state supreme court rulings on matters of state law are final, rulings on matters of federal law (generally made under the state court's concurrent jurisdiction ) can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States . Each state supreme court consists of a panel of judges selected by methods outlined in
1479-454: A super-majority in both houses of the state legislature. Traditionally, state supreme courts are headquartered in the capital cities of their respective states, though they may occasionally hold oral arguments elsewhere. The six main exceptions are: As for the court's actual facilities, a state supreme court may be housed in the state capitol, in a nearby state office building shared with other courts or state executive branch agencies, or in
1566-403: A two-tier appellate system. A litigant can take two pathways to discretionary review: (1) directly petitioning the State's supreme court or (2) permission from the district court of appeal. There are four instances where the State's supreme court can exercise discretion when to review: (1) district court decisions that expressly declare a valid state statute—even where the validity of the statute
1653-415: A unique procedure for appeals. In those states, all appeals are filed with the appropriate Supreme Court (Iowa and Nevada each have a single Supreme Court, while Oklahoma has separate civil and criminal Supreme Courts) which then keeps all cases of first impression for itself to decide. It forwards the remaining cases – which deal with points of law it has already addressed – to
1740-460: Is discretionary (cases the Court may choose to hear if it wishes) in most cases and mandatory (cases the court must hear) in a few cases. In some matters, the Court has original jurisdiction , meaning that the case can begin and end in the Supreme Court absent a basis for further appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States . The Court also has some forms of exclusive jurisdiction , meaning that it
1827-413: Is not the issue before the court; (2) District Court decisions involving the interpretation of [a provision or term] of federal constitution; (3) when the district court's decision directly conflicts with another district's or supreme court ruling; (4) and district court decisions directly affecting the duties, powers, validity, formation, termination or regulation of constitutional or state officers. When
SECTION 20
#17328482557581914-527: Is that they do not circulate outside of the building. The Library has an online catalog. State supreme court ( Alabama to Missouri , Montana to Wyoming ) In the United States , a state supreme court (known by other names in some states) is the highest court in the state judiciary of a U.S. state . On matters of state law , the judgment of a state supreme court is considered final and binding in both state and federal courts. Generally,
2001-447: Is the only court or government body that can decide the issue. The Florida Constitution, Article V, (3)(b)(1), establishes mandatory jurisdiction for the following: The Florida Constitution, Article V, (3)(b)(3–5), provides discretionary jurisdiction for a much larger set of circumstances, including: The Florida Constitution further grants the Supreme Court original nonexclusive jurisdiction over certain matters. "Original" means that
2088-549: Is to decide whether the record reflects that the trial court correctly applied existing law. In a few states without intermediate appellate courts, the state supreme court may operate under "mandatory review", in which it must hear all appeals from the trial courts. This was the case, for example, in Nevada prior to 2014. For certain categories of cases, many state supreme courts that otherwise have discretionary review operate under mandatory review, usually with regard to cases involving
2175-497: The governor of Florida between three and six names for each vacancy on the court, from which the governor selects the new justice. The governor's selection is final and requires no further approval by any governmental body. Up until 1971 when merit selection was implemented, judges were chosen by direct election of the people. In 1974, Justice Ben Overton became the first Supreme Court justice chosen by merit selection. Justices must meet four requirements to qualify for appointment to
2262-470: The state constitution . Among the most common methods for selection are gubernatorial appointment, non-partisan election, and partisan election, but the different states follow a variety of procedures. Under the system of federalism established by the United States Constitution , federal courts have limited jurisdiction , and state courts handle many more cases than do federal courts. Each of
2349-594: The writ of prohibition . The Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over some other matters. "Exclusive" means that the Florida Supreme Court is the only court or governmental body that can resolve the issue. This category includes regulation of the Florida Bar , regulation of admissions to the Bar, creating and amending the Florida Rules of Court, and determining whether the governor is incapacitated and thus unable to fulfill
2436-430: The " Supreme Court—Appellate Division ". West Virginia mixes the two; its highest court is called the " Supreme Court of Appeals ". Other states' supreme courts have used the term "Appeals": Pennsylvania's court of last resort from 1780-1808 ; New Jersey 's supreme courts under the 1844 constitution; and Delaware 's supreme court were all called the " Court of Errors and Appeals ". The term "Errors" refers to
2523-482: The Court only determines whether the citizens' initiative meets two legal requirements: its ballot summary fairly advises the voters of its effect; and it only contains a single subject. A negative advisory opinion removes non-conforming initiatives from the ballot. Pursuant to a 1980 amendment to the Florida Constitution, the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction to review a "per curiam affirmed" decision by one of
2610-501: The Court: they must be an elector (a qualified, registered voter) of the state, they must reside in the territorial jurisdiction of the state when they assume office, they must be members of the Florida Bar for at least ten years, and they must be under 75 years of age. After appointment, the new justice must face statewide voters in the next general election that is more than one year after
2697-572: The Florida District Courts of Appeal, meaning that, in the vast majority of cases, decisions of the Florida District Court of Appeal are final, subject only to the possibility of review by the United States Supreme Court. For an example in which a "per curiam affirmed" decision was reviewed by the United States Supreme Court and reversed, see Ibanez v. Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, 512 U.S. 136 (1994). In
Supreme Court of Florida - Misplaced Pages Continue
2784-725: The Florida Legislature enacts a joint resolution reapportioning the State House and Senate, the plan is presented to the Supreme Court on a petition filed by the Florida Attorney General. The Supreme Court's review of an apportionment plan created by the Legislature is guided by several standards specified in the Constitution, including new ones added to the Constitution by the voters in 2010 that prohibit gerrymandering . If
2871-578: The Ibanez case, the Florida State Board of Accountancy held that a CPA who was also a lawyer was prohibited from disclosing on her law firm letterhead that she was also a CPA, and the First District Court of Appeal "per curiam affirmed" the decision. The United States Supreme Court reversed. The Supreme Court also has the duty to review legislative redistricting after each decennial Census. After
2958-406: The Legislature fails to initially pass a reapportionment plan or fails to enact a remedial plan after its primary plan is rejected by the Supreme Court, then the Court has the duty to apportion the State. The Supreme Court also has the authority to impose discipline on state judges for ethical breaches, which can range from a public televised reprimand to removal from office. The Court is composed of
3045-567: The State Senate. In 1885, the state returned to elected justices. In 1940, the court's membership was finally increased to its current size of seven members, and a 1926 constitutional amendment provided that the chief justice should be elected by the justices of the Court. A two-year term for the chief justice was established by the Rules of Court adopted by the Supreme Court, with each term beginning on July 1 of even-numbered years and ending on June 30 in
3132-466: The State's highest court through a Constitutional Provision. Florida's discretion in exercising power is likely the most limited of the States courts that employ the discretionary power jurisdiction. While the provision does not expressly state "discretionary jurisdiction," the categorical nature of the language restricts the use of the court's discretion. Like other federal and state court systems, Florida has
3219-556: The U.S. Supreme Court recognized in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938), no part of the federal Constitution actually grants federal courts or the federal Congress the power to directly dictate the content of state law (as distinguished from creating altogether separate federal law that in a particular situation may override state law). Clause 1 of Section 2 of Article Three of the United States Constitution describes
3306-513: The United States and throughout the world. An estimated one-quarter of the entire fleet of satellite trucks used by broadcasters in North America was present in Tallahassee at the height of the controversy. These events later were dramatized in the 2008 HBO movie Recount . Former chief justice Charles T. Wells , who presided over the two historic cases argued at the state highest court, wrote
3393-479: The applicable law, they believe the trial court incorrectly interpreted the existing law or incorrectly applied the existing law to the facts. Thus, if the lower court makes an error, the intermediate or highest court will reverse or remand (sends back to the lower court) the case. The "law declaring" function means that the appellate court rules on novel issues in a case, and under stare decisis , those rulings become new laws in themselves. In those cases where: (1)
3480-424: The appointment and re-appointment of state supreme court judges. Most judicial selection systems involving gubernatorial appointment make use of a nominating commission to recommend a list of candidates from which the governor must choose, but a minority of states allow the governor to nominate candidates even if they were not recommended by the commission. Many of the states that use gubernatorial appointment require
3567-697: The appointment to be confirmed by the state legislature or some other body, such as the Massachusetts Governor's Council . Although most states limit judicial terms to a set number of years, judges in Massachusetts and New Hampshire serve until they reach a mandatory retirement limit, while in Rhode Island, judges serve lifetime appointments. Most judges represent the entire state, but in Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, and Mississippi, judges represent districts of
Supreme Court of Florida - Misplaced Pages Continue
3654-419: The area of search and seizure and appear to follow precedent in confessions as well. Additionally, some scholars have argued that state and federal courts should judge according to different judicial theories on topics such as statutory interpretation and stare decisis. State supreme court judges are selected in a variety of ways, with the method of selection often depending on the circumstances in which
3741-527: The ballot without their partisan affiliation listed. Most of the remaining states base their judicial selection system on gubernatorial appointments or partisan elections, although several states use a mix of different methods. South Carolina and Virginia use a system of legislative appointment, while in Vermont, the governor makes the initial appointment of judges, but the legislature has the power to re-appoint judges to new terms. Various other factors can influence
3828-470: The capacity of Supreme Court justices until 1851 when an 1848 constitutional amendment took effect granting the state legislature power to choose three justices. In 1853, another constitutional amendment was adopted that provided for the popular election of justices to serve six-year terms. Following the Civil War and the adoption of the 1868 Constitution, justices were appointed by the governor and confirmed by
3915-405: The case can begin and end in the state Supreme Court absent a basis for further appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. "Nonexclusive" means that these matters do not absolutely have to begin in the Supreme Court, but also could originate in a lower court. The bulk of matters falling within this category often are called the "extraordinary writs" and include habeas corpus , mandamus , quo warranto , and
4002-437: The case is important enough to hear before the court will grant it a review. Many state supreme courts use a similar process to choose which cases they will hear. A judge's personal policy preferences and workload inadvertently drive the court's selection process or screening procedures. Generally, a court will select cases involving broad and significant policy questions that have produced uncertainties amongst lower courts as
4089-418: The chief justice and six other justices, who all serve six-year staggered terms. The justices elect the chief justice from amongst themselves. Justices must be an elector (a qualified, registered voter) of the state and must have been a member in good standing of the Florida Bar for at least ten years. The Court must have at least one justice who resided in each of Florida's six lower appellate districts on
4176-729: The court had a backlog of 1,544 cases. In 2011, there was a backlog of 881 cases. The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Florida is laid out in Article V of the Florida Constitution . The Court follows the common law and since its first case, Stewart v. Preston (1846), has published its opinions, first in official law reports called the Florida Reports and more recently in the Southern Series edited by West Publishing . The Supreme Court of Florida has appellate jurisdiction that
4263-445: The date of initial appointment. In this "merit retention" election, voters decide only if the new justice will remain in office. If not retained in office, the governor appoints a replacement through the same Judicial Nominating Commission process. After this first merit retention election, justices face the voters in the same type of merit retention election every six years thereafter until they leave or reach retirement age. Following
4350-450: The date of their appointment. Amendment 6 passed in 2018 raised the mandatory retirement age for justices to 75, effective July 1, 2019. At least five justices must be present for the Court to carry out its official functions, and at least four justices must agree on decisions issued by the Court. The chief justice can assign judges of the lower courts to serve as temporary justices (called "associate justices" under Florida Rules of Court) if
4437-424: The decisions of lower courts, remand cases to lower courts for further proceedings, and establish binding precedent for future cases. Some state supreme courts do have original jurisdiction over specific issues; for example, the Supreme Court of Virginia has original jurisdiction over cases of habeas corpus , mandamus , prohibition , and writs of actual innocence based on DNA or other biological evidence. As
SECTION 50
#17328482557584524-498: The duties of office. It also includes two forms of jurisdiction to issue advisory opinions . The Court can provide an advisory opinion upon a request by the governor to address uncertainties about legal issues involving the executive branch's powers. It also can issue advisory opinions to the Florida Attorney General about citizens' initiatives to amend the state Constitution. However, for this last type of advisory opinion,
4611-534: The fifty states has at least one supreme court that serves as the highest court in the state; two states, Texas and Oklahoma, have separate supreme courts for civil and criminal matters. The five permanently inhabited U.S. territories , as well Washington, D.C. , each have comparable supreme courts. On matters of state law , the judgment of a state supreme court is considered final and binding in both state and federal courts. State supreme courts are completely distinct from any United States federal courts located within
4698-406: The first appeal, a litigant is not entitled to a successive appeal by the supreme court. Alternatively, in a few cases, those of great importance, such as capital cases, may be appealed directly to the highest court as a matter of right. At either tier, the court has two basic functions: "error correction" and "law declaring." The "error correction" function allows the appellate court to examine
4785-417: The first commencing on the first day of January and the second beginning on the first day of July. A relatively complex appointment process (a modified form of the " Missouri Plan ") is set forth in the Florida Constitution , which requires the creation of a Judicial Nominating Commission composed of persons appointed to staggered four-year terms, representing various interests. The commission must submit to
4872-423: The geographical boundaries of a state's territory, or the federal-level Supreme Court. The exact duties and powers of the state supreme courts are established by state constitutions and state law. Generally, state supreme courts, like most appellate tribunals, are exclusively for hearing appeals on decisions issued by lower courts, and do not make any finding of facts or hold trials. They can, however, overrule
4959-414: The higher courts are concertedly looking to establish uniformity in the law. Although uniformity is the court's primary responsibility, judges are more likely motivated by their policy goals. They will vote to accept cases if the believe they can improve their court's policies or make a decision more favorable to their own policy preferences. In Florida , discretionary jurisdiction is a power assigned to
5046-625: The highest court in the state, a state supreme court has appellate jurisdiction over all matters of state law. Many states have two or more levels of courts below the state supreme court; for example, in Pennsylvania, a case might first be heard in one of the Pennsylvania courts of common pleas , be appealed to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania , and then finally be appealed to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania . In other states, including Delaware,
5133-400: The initial term is three years or less because the justices must appear on the ballot in the next general election that occurs more than one year after their appointment. Afterward, they serve six-year terms and remain in office if retained in the general election near the end of each term. Citizens vote on whether or not they want to retain each justice in office. Chief justices are elected by
5220-483: The interim). Notably, the Supreme Court of Virginia has always operated under discretionary review for nearly all cases, but from its creation in 1985, the intermediate Court of Appeals of Virginia heard appeals as a matter of right only in family and administrative cases. After two other states adopted appeals of right in the late 2000s, this left Virginia as the only state in the Union with no first appeal of right for
5307-416: The intermediate Court of Appeals. Under this so-called "push-down" or "deflection" model of appellate procedure, the state supreme court can immediately establish final statewide precedents on important issues of first impression as soon as they arise, rather than waiting several months or years for the intermediate appellate court to make a first attempt at resolving the issue (and leaving the law uncertain in
SECTION 60
#17328482557585394-513: The interpretation of the state constitution or capital punishment . One of the informal traditions of the American legal system is that all litigants are entitled to at least one appeal after a final judgment on the merits. However, appeal is merely a privilege provided by statute, court rules, or custom; the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that there is no federal constitutional right to an appeal. Iowa , Nevada , and Oklahoma have
5481-523: The latter situation, the appellate court will focus on truly novel questions or revisiting older legal rules that are now clearly obsolete or unconstitutional. For example, the United States Supreme Court hears cases by a writ of certiorari , meaning that it calls appellants up to the court only if their case is important enough to merit the court's resources. The Supreme Court employs a "rule of four," meaning that four justices have to think
5568-604: The library clerk was the staff member that handled all reference questions and served as librarian. It was not until 1956, under section 25.341 of the Florida Statutes , that the Supreme Court had a separate librarian administering the library including reference. The library holds various collections to assist professionals and members of the public. Some examples are court decisions, statutes, regulations, jury instructions, legal periodicals, and treatises, in both print and online format. One interesting fact about these collections
5655-508: The lower courts have no such power. For this reason, the lower courts must entertain any case properly filed, so long as the court has subject matter jurisdiction over the questions of law and in personam jurisdiction over the parties to the case. Customarily a court is granted the power by rule, statute, or constitutional provision. When a constitutional provision establishes the court's power, it will have more limitations on its screening process. The usual intent behind granting power through
5742-401: The members of the Court to two-year terms that end in every even-numbered year. Chief justices may succeed themselves in office if they are re-elected by the other justices. The chief justice also can appoint judges to temporary duty on the Court if at least one of the justices is unable to hear a case for any reason. The temporary justices are called "associate justices" and are usually chosen on
5829-445: The merits. In March 2021, Virginia enacted a comprehensive reform package allowing for appeals of right to the Court of Appeals in civil and criminal cases. The same bill expanded the Court of Appeals from 11 to 17 judges to handle the increased workload. Under American federalism , a state supreme court's ruling on a matter of purely state law is final and binding and must be accepted in both state and federal courts. However, when
5916-448: The name " Supreme Court ". Additionally the highest court in Maine is named the " Supreme Judicial Court ". This similar terminology is probably a holdover from the time when Maine was part of Massachusetts. In Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, and New York, the highest courts formerly used variations of the term "Court of Errors," which indicated that the court's primary purpose
6003-450: The need arises. Under the Court's Internal Operations Procedures Manual, the appointment of associate justices rotates among the chief judges of the district courts of appeal in their numerical order, from one to five, and then starts over again. The intent behind this procedure is to eliminate any concern that temporary associate justices are appointed because of their personal views on legal issues. The Court holds two terms each year, with
6090-419: The next even-numbered year. In the early 1970s, more than half the justices resigned over various corruption probes. In 1975, Florida Supreme Court justice David L. McCain tampered with a lower court decision on behalf of campaign supporters. Faced with impeachment proceedings, he resigned. In 1976, the state returned to appointed justices when the current merit retention system was put in place. In 2004,
6177-519: The now-obsolete writ of error , which was used by state supreme courts to correct certain types of egregious errors committed by lower courts. Massachusetts and New Hampshire originally named their highest courts the "Superior Court of Judicature." Since 1780, Massachusetts has used the name " Supreme Judicial Court " (to distinguish itself from the state legislature, which is called the Massachusetts General Court ); New Hampshire uses
6264-479: The only appeal from the Florida Supreme Court is to the U.S. Supreme Court on questions of federal law. Established upon statehood in 1845, the Florida Supreme Court is headquartered across Duval Street from the state capitol in Tallahassee . Throughout the court's history, it has undergone many reorganizations as Florida's population has grown. As of October 2020, each justice of the Florida Supreme Court receives
6351-590: The parties disagree vigorously if any existing legal rule even applies to the facts of the case; (2) the appellant may be deliberately trying to attack an established rule hoping the appellate court will overturn a prior decision and establish a new rule; (3) multiple intermediate appellate courts have ruled upon the question and the question is so perplexing that all the lower courts disagree with each other. An appellate court with discretionary jurisdiction can delegate error correction to lower courts while it focuses its limited resources on properly developing case law. In
6438-462: The precedent established by the U.S. Supreme Court as to all issues of federal law, but in practice, the Supreme Court reviews very few decisions from state courts. For example, in 2007 the Court reviewed 244 cases appealed from federal courts and only 22 from state courts. Despite the relatively small number of decisions reviewed, Professors Sara Benesh and Wendy Martinek found that state supreme courts follow precedent more closely than federal courts in
6525-588: The processes for capital punishment . The United States Supreme Court struck down part of this law in January 2016 in Hurst v. Florida , declaring that a judge determining the aggravating facts to be used in considering a death sentence with only a non-binding recommendation from the jury based on a majority vote was insufficient and violated the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial. The Florida Legislature passed
6612-588: The proposed award of a public sector contract in Northern Ireland , where the court had made a decision regarding the first challenge, the judge handling the second challenge noted that his role to exercise "what is plainly a discretionary jurisdiction". In the particular circumstances of the case in First4Skills Ltd v Department for Employment and Learning , the judge ( Mr Justice McCloskey ) observed that it would be "incongruous" to exercise this discretion in
6699-584: The recommendation of the Judicial Qualifications Commission, at which time the Court may remove a justice or impose a lesser penalty such as a fine or reprimand; and justices may be impeached by a two-thirds vote of the Florida House of Representatives and convicted by a two-thirds vote of the Senate . In 1999, a dissenting opinion by Justice Leander J. Shaw Jr. sparked a worldwide debate over
6786-418: The record to determine whether the lower court applied existing law correctly according to the law and applicable procedure. The function affords a litigant a second set of eyes and promotes the court's interest in fairness. It is the job of the lower court to adjudicate a matter in accordance with applicable legal standards. However, oftentimes a litigant will appeal, asserting that while the parties agree on
6873-403: The removal of state supreme court judges during their terms, with many states providing multiple methods. Two common methods of removal are impeachment by the state legislature, and removal by state judicial boards or commissions. Other states provide for the removal of judges through recall elections , court action, gubernatorial action (with legislative consent), or through a resolution passed by
6960-451: The scope of federal judicial power, but only extended it to "the Laws of the United States" and not the laws of the several or individual states. It is this silence on that latter issue that gave rise to the American distinction between state and federal common law not found in other English-speaking common law federations like Australia and Canada . In theory, state supreme courts are bound by
7047-475: The seat is filled. Under one common method, the Missouri Plan , the governor fills judicial vacancies by choosing from a list compiled by a non-partisan commission. These judges serve an interim term until they stand in a retention election , in which they win a full term if a majority of voters vote for retention. Many other states elect judges through non-partisan elections in which multiple candidates appear on
7134-459: The state and federal levels in the United States : trial, intermediate (appellate) court, and court of last resort (supreme court). This structure creates a two-tier appellate system. The system affords a litigant one appeal as a matter of right after trial. The state's or district's intermediate court will review the first appeal, and after the intermediate court renders a decision, the supreme court will conduct any further review. However, unlike
7221-492: The state supreme court is the only appellate court in the state and thus has direct appellate jurisdiction over all lower courts. Like the U.S. Supreme Court, most state supreme courts have implemented "discretionary review." Under such a system, intermediate appellate courts are entrusted with deciding the vast majority of appeals. Intermediate appellate courts generally focus on the mundane task of what appellate specialists call "error correction," which means their primary task
7308-400: The state. Many states, including some states in which the governor is not otherwise involved in the appointment process, allow the governor to make interim appointments to fill judicial vacancies. In many states with judicial elections, political contributions from groups such as trade associations and political action committees are allowed. The various states provide different methods for
7395-466: The use of Old Sparky , Florida's electric chair , which helped lead to events that caused the Florida Legislature to adopt lethal injection as the state's method of execution only a few months later. In 2004, the Court struck down another piece of legislation from the Florida Legislature that was designed to reverse a lower court decision in the Terri Schiavo case . In 2006, the Court struck down
7482-623: The vast majority of civil and criminal cases. Appellants were still free to petition for review, but such petitions were subject to severe length constraints (6,125 words or 35 pages in Virginia) and necessarily were more narrowly targeted than an opening brief in an appeal of right to an intermediate appellate court (in contrast, an appellant's opening brief to a California intermediate appellate court can run up to 14,000 words). The vast majority of decisions of Virginia circuit courts in civil and criminal cases were thereby insulated from appellate review on
7569-416: Was to correct the errors of lower courts. Discretionary jurisdiction Discretionary jurisdiction is a power that allows a court to engage in discretionary review . This power gives a court the authority to decide whether to hear a particular case brought before it. Typically, courts of last resort and intermediate courts in a state or country will have discretionary jurisdiction. In contrast,
#757242