Enochian ( / ɪ ˈ n oʊ k i ə n / ə- NOH -kee-ən ) is an occult constructed language —said by its originators to have been received from angels—recorded in the private journals of John Dee and his colleague Edward Kelley in late 16th-century England. Kelley was a scryer who worked with Dee in his magical investigations. The language is integral to the practice of Enochian magic .
47-553: The language found in Dee's and Kelley's journals encompasses a limited textual corpus . Linguist Donald Laycock , an Australian Skeptic , studied the Enochian journals, and argues against any extraordinary features. The untranslated texts of the Liber Loagaeth manuscript recall the patterns of glossolalia rather than true language. Dee did not distinguish the Liber Loagaeth material from
94-649: A new past form ( dared ), distinct from the modal durst . The perfect of the verbs had not yet been standardised to use only the auxiliary verb "to have". Some took as their auxiliary verb "to be", such as this example from the King James Version : "But which of you... will say unto him... when he is come from the field, Go and sit down..." [Luke XVII:7]. The rules for the auxiliaries for different verbs were similar to those that are still observed in German and French (see unaccusative verb ). The modern syntax used for
141-533: A new period of internal peace and relative stability, which encouraged the arts including literature. Modern English can be taken to have emerged fully by the beginning of the Georgian era in 1714, but English orthography remained somewhat fluid until the publication of Johnson's A Dictionary of the English Language , in 1755. The towering importance of William Shakespeare over the other Elizabethan authors
188-458: A number of root words in Enochian. He lists Doh , I , Ia , Iad , among others, as likely root words. While the Angelic Keys contain most of the known vocabulary of Enochian, dozens of further words are found throughout Dee's journals. Thousands of additional, undefined words are contained in the Liber Loagaeth . Laycock notes that the material in Liber Loagaeth appears to be different from
235-503: A phoneme that became modern / ɜːr / . By the time of Shakespeare, the spellings ⟨er⟩ , ⟨ear⟩ and perhaps ⟨or⟩ when they had a short vowel, as in clerk , earth , or divert , had an a -like quality, perhaps about [ɐɹ] or [äɹ] . With the spelling ⟨or⟩ , the sound may have been backed, more toward [ɒɹ] in words like worth and word . In some pronunciations, words like fair and fear , with
282-463: A specific language territory. A corpus may contain texts in a single language ( monolingual corpus ) or text data in multiple languages ( multilingual corpus ). In order to make the corpora more useful for doing linguistic research, they are often subjected to a process known as annotation . An example of annotating a corpus is part-of-speech tagging , or POS-tagging , in which information about each word's part of speech (verb, noun, adjective, etc.)
329-537: A vowel or an h , as in mine eyes or thine hand . During the Early Modern period, the verb inflections became simplified as they evolved towards their modern forms: The modal auxiliaries cemented their distinctive syntactical characteristics during the Early Modern period. Thus, the use of modals without an infinitive became rare (as in "I must to Coventry"; "I'll none of that"). The use of modals' present participles to indicate aspect (as in "Maeyinge suffer no more
376-406: Is "thoroughly English", apart from difficult sequences such as bdrios , excolphabmartbh , longamphlg , lapch , etc. Similarly, Enochian orthography closely follows Early Modern English orthography , for example in having soft and hard ⟨c⟩ and ⟨g⟩ , and in using digraphs ⟨ch⟩ , ⟨ph⟩ , ⟨sh⟩ , and ⟨th⟩ for
423-487: Is added to the corpus in the form of tags . Another example is indicating the lemma (base) form of each word. When the language of the corpus is not a working language of the researchers who use it, interlinear glossing is used to make the annotation bilingual. Some corpora have further structured levels of analysis applied. In particular, smaller corpora may be fully parsed . Such corpora are usually called Treebanks or Parsed Corpora . The difficulty of ensuring that
470-535: Is contained in 49 Tables. In 49 voices, or callings: which are the Natural Keys to open those, not 49 but 48 (for one is not to be opened) Gates of Understanding, whereby you shall have knowledge to move every Gate... But you shall understand that these 19 Calls are the Calls, or entrances into the knowledge of the mystical Tables. Every Table containing one whole leaf, whereunto you need no other circumstances. The language
517-431: Is less common. Compounds may exhibit variant spellings of the words combined. Conjugation can result in spelling changes which can appear to be random or haphazard. Due to this, Aaron Leitch has expressed doubt as to whether Enochian actually has conjugations. The very scant evidence of Enochian verb conjugation seems quite reminiscent of English, including the verb 'to be' which is highly irregular. Laycock reports that
SECTION 10
#1732844514349564-473: Is no discernible system behind them: As Laycock put it, "the test of any future spirit-revelation of the Enochian language will be the explanation of this numerical system." Dee believed Enochian to be the Adamic language universally spoken before the confusion of tongues . However, modern analysis shows Enochian to be an English-like constructed language . Word order closely follows English, except for
611-498: Is no evidence that these early invocations are any form of 'language' [...] at all. There have been several compilations of Enochian words made to form Enochian dictionaries. A scholarly study is Donald Laycock 's The Complete Enochian Dictionary . Also useful is Vinci's Gmicalzoma: An Enochian Dictionary . The number system is inexplicable. It seems possible to identify the numerals from 0 to 10: However, Enochian texts contain larger numbers written in alphabetical form, and there
658-630: Is recognisably similar to that of today , but spelling was unstable. Early Modern and Modern English both retain various orthographical conventions that predate the Great Vowel Shift . Early Modern English spelling was broadly similar to that encountered in Middle English . Some of the changes that occurred were based on etymology (as with the silent ⟨b⟩ that was added to words like debt , doubt and subtle ). Many spellings had still not been standardised. For example, he
705-729: Is the stage of the English language from the beginning of the Tudor period to the English Interregnum and Restoration , or from the transition from Middle English , in the late 15th century, to the transition to Modern English , in the mid-to-late 17th century. Before and after the accession of James I to the English throne in 1603, the emerging English standard began to influence the spoken and written Middle Scots of Scotland. The grammatical and orthographical conventions of literary English in
752-400: The annus mirabilis (year of wonders), and in prose lasts until 1688. With the increasing tensions over succession and the corresponding rise in journalism and periodicals, or until possibly 1700, when those periodicals grew more stabilised. The 17th-century port towns and their forms of speech gained influence over the old county towns . From around the 1690s onwards, England experienced
799-526: The ASCII range, with the letters assigned to the codepoints of their English equivalents. The grammar is for the most part without articles or prepositions. Adjectives are quite rare. Aaron Leitch identifies several affixes in Enochian, including -o (indicating 'of') and -ax (which functions like -ing in English). Leitch observes that, unlike English, Enochian appears to have a vocative case , citing Dee's note in
846-499: The Great Vowel Shift ; see the related chart. The difference between the transcription of the EME diphthong offsets with ⟨ j w ⟩, as opposed to the usual modern English transcription with ⟨ ɪ̯ ʊ̯ ⟩ is not meaningful in any way. The precise EME realizations are not known, and they vary even in modern English. The r sound (the phoneme / r / ) was probably always pronounced with following vowel sounds (more in
893-632: The Hebrew and Ancient Greek distinction between second person singular ("thou") and plural ("ye"). It was not to denote reverence (in the King James Version , God addresses individual people and even Satan as "thou") but only to denote the singular. Over the centuries, however, the very fact that "thou" was dropping out of normal use gave it a special aura and so it gradually and ironically came to be used to express reverence in hymns and in prayers. Like other personal pronouns, thou and ye have different forms dependent on their grammatical case ; specifically,
940-577: The progressive aspect ("I am walking") became dominant by the end of the Early Modern period, but other forms were also common such as the prefix a- ("I am a-walking") and the infinitive paired with "do" ("I do walk"). Moreover, the to be + - ing verb form could be used to express a passive meaning without any additional markers: "The house is building" could mean "The house is being built". A number of words that are still in common use in Modern English have undergone semantic narrowing . The use of
987-451: The seer Edward Kelley , although Dee had used several other seers previously. With Kelley's help as a scryer , Dee set out to establish lasting contact with the angels. Their work resulted, among other things, in the reception of Angelical, now more commonly known as Enochian. The reception started on March 26, 1583, when Kelley reported visions in the crystal of a 21-lettered alphabet. A few days later, Kelley started receiving what became
SECTION 20
#17328445143491034-541: The English letters J, K, and W. The Enochian script is written from right to left in John Dee's diary. Different documents have slightly different forms of the script. The alphabet also shares many graphical similarities to a script, also attributed to the prophet Enoch, that appeared in the Voarchadumia Contra Alchimiam of Johannes Pantheus, a copy of which Dee is known to have owned. The phonology of Enochian
1081-494: The book Liber Loagaeth ("Book [of] Speech from God"). The book consists of 49 great letter tables, or squares made of 49 by 49 letters. (However, each table has a front and a back side, making 98 tables of 49×49 letters altogether.) Dee and Kelley said the angels never translated the texts in this book. About a year later, at the court of King Stephen Báthory in Kraków , where both alchemists stayed for some time, another set of texts
1128-519: The dearth of articles and prepositions. Adjectives, although rare, typically precede the noun as in English. Laycock notes that there are about 250 different words in the corpus of Enochian texts, more than half of which occur only once . A few resemble words in the Bible – mostly proper names – in both sound and meaning. For example, luciftias "brightness" resembles Lucifer "the light-bearer"; babalond "wicked, harlot" resembles Babylon . Leitch notes
1175-655: The dearth of articles and prepositions. The very scant evidence of Enochian verb conjugation is likewise reminiscent of English, more so than with Semitic languages such as Hebrew, which Dee said were debased versions of the Enochian language. Text corpus In linguistics and natural language processing , a corpus ( pl. : corpora ) or text corpus is a dataset, consisting of natively digital and older, digitalized, language resources , either annotated or unannotated. Annotated, they have been used in corpus linguistics for statistical hypothesis testing , checking occurrences or validating linguistic rules within
1222-522: The disputes over Tyndale 's translation of the Bible in the 1520s and the 1530s) but by 1650, "thou" seems old-fashioned or literary. It has effectively completely disappeared from Modern Standard English . The translators of the King James Version of the Bible (begun 1604 and published 1611, while Shakespeare was at the height of his popularity) had a particular reason for keeping the informal "thou/thee/thy/thine/thyself" forms that were slowly beginning to fall out of spoken use, as it enabled them to match
1269-530: The entire corpus is completely and consistently annotated means that these corpora are usually smaller, containing around one to three million words. Other levels of linguistic structured analysis are possible, including annotations for morphology , semantics and pragmatics . Corpora are the main knowledge base in corpus linguistics . Other notable areas of application include: Early Modern English Early Modern English (sometimes abbreviated EModE or EMnE ) or Early New English ( ENE )
1316-425: The era's long GOAT vowel, rather than today's STRUT vowels. Tongue derived from the sound of tong and rhymed with song . Early Modern English had two second-person personal pronouns: thou , the informal singular pronoun, and ye , the plural (both formal and informal) pronoun and the formal singular pronoun. "Thou" and "ye" were both common in the early 16th century (they can be seen, for example, in
1363-483: The language of the 'Calls' found in the Angelic Keys , which appear to have been generated from the tables and squares of the Loagaeth . According to Laycock: The texts in the Loagaeth show patterning "characteristically found in certain types of meaningless language (such as glossolalia ), which is often produced under conditions similar to trance . In other words, Kelley may have been 'speaking in tongues'. [...] there
1410-675: The largest number of forms are recorded for 'be' and for goh- 'say': Note that christeos 'let there be' might be from 'Christ', and if so is not part of a conjugation. For negation of verbs, two constructions are attested: e.g. chis ge 'are not' ( chis 'they are') and ip uran 'not see' ( uran 'see'). While Enochian does have personal pronouns, they are rare and used in ways that can be difficult to understand. Relative possessive pronouns do exist but are used sparingly. Attested personal pronouns (Dee's material only): Demonstrative pronouns: oi 'this', unal 'these, those', priaz(i) 'those'. Word order closely follows English, except for
1457-500: The late 16th century and the 17th century are still very influential on modern Standard English . Most modern readers of English can understand texts written in the late phase of Early Modern English, such as the King James Bible and the works of William Shakespeare , and they have greatly influenced Modern English. Texts from the earlier phase of Early Modern English, such as the late-15th-century Le Morte d'Arthur (1485) and
Enochian - Misplaced Pages Continue
1504-407: The loue & deathe of Aurelio" from 1556), and of their preterite forms to indicate tense (as in "he follow'd Horace so very close, that of necessity he must fall with him") also became uncommon. Some verbs ceased to function as modals during the Early Modern period. The present form of must , mot , became obsolete. Dare also lost the syntactical characteristics of a modal auxiliary and evolved
1551-463: The margin of the First Table of Loagaeth – "Befes the vocative case of Befafes". Compounds are frequent in the Enochian corpus. Modifiers and indicators are typically compounded with the nouns and verbs modified or indicated. These compounds can occur with demonstrative pronouns and conjunctions, as well as with various forms of the verb 'to be'. The compounding of nouns with adjectives or other verbs
1598-470: The mid-16th-century Gorboduc (1561), may present more difficulties but are still closer to Modern English grammar, lexicon and phonology than are 14th-century Middle English texts, such as the works of Geoffrey Chaucer . The change from Middle English to Early Modern English affected much more than just vocabulary and pronunciation. Middle English underwent significant change over time and contained large dialectical variations. Early Modern English, on
1645-469: The objective form of thou is thee , its possessive forms are thy and thine , and its reflexive or emphatic form is thyself . The objective form of ye was you , its possessive forms are your and yours and its reflexive or emphatic forms are yourself and yourselves . The older forms "mine" and "thine" had become "my" and "thy" before words beginning with a consonant other than h , and "mine" and "thine" were retained before words beginning with
1692-472: The other hand, became more standardised and developed an established canon of literature that survives today. The English Civil War and the Interregnum were times of social and political upheaval and instability. The dates for Restoration literature are a matter of convention and differ markedly from genre to genre. In drama, the "Restoration" may last until 1700, but in poetry, it may last only until 1666,
1739-536: The sounds /tʃ ~ k/ , /f/ , /ʃ/ , and /θ/ . Laycock mapped Enochian orthography to its sound system and says, "the resulting pronunciation makes it sound much more like English than it looks at first sight". However, the difficult strings of consonants and vowels in words such as ooaona , paombd , smnad and noncf are the kind of pattern one gets by joining letters from a text together in an arbitrary pattern. As Laycock notes, "The reader can test this by taking, for example, every tenth letter on this page, and dividing
1786-517: The spellings ⟨air⟩ and ⟨ear⟩ , rhymed with each other, and words with the spelling ⟨are⟩ , such as prepare and compare , were sometimes pronounced with a more open vowel sound, like the verbs are and scar . See Great Vowel Shift § Later mergers for more information. Nature was pronounced approximately as [ˈnɛːtəɹ] and may have rhymed with letter or, early on, even latter . One may have been pronounced own , with both one and other using
1833-404: The string of letters into words. The 'text' created will tend to look rather like Enochian." The Enochian letters, with their letter names and English equivalents as given by Dee, and pronunciations as reconstructed by Laycock, are as follows. Modern pronunciation conventions vary, depending on the affiliations of the practitioner. A number of fonts for the Enochian script are available. They use
1880-651: The style of today's General American , West Country English , Irish accents and Scottish accents, although in the case of the Scottish accent the R is rolled, and less like the pronunciation now usual in most of England.) Furthermore, at the beginning of the Early Modern English period there were three non-open and non- schwa short vowels before /r/ in the syllable coda : /e/ , /i/ and /u/ (roughly equivalent to modern /ɛ/ , /ɪ/ and /ʊ/ ; /ʌ/ had not yet developed). In London English they gradually merged into
1927-705: The translated language of the Calls , which is more like an artificial language. This language was called Angelical by Dee and later came to be referred to as "Enochian" by subsequent writers. The phonology and grammar resemble English, though the translations are not sufficient to work out any regular morphology . Some Enochian words resemble words and proper names in the Bible, but most have no apparent etymology. Dee's journals also refer to this language as " Celestial Speech ", " First Language of God-Christ ", " Holy Language ", or " Language of Angels ". He also referred to it as " Adamical " because, according to Dee's angels, it
Enochian - Misplaced Pages Continue
1974-424: The verb "to suffer" in the sense of "to allow" survived into Early Modern English, as in the phrase "suffer the little children" of the King James Version , but it has mostly been lost in Modern English. This use still exists in the idiom "to suffer fools gladly". Also, this period includes one of the earliest Russian borrowings to English (which is historically a rare occasion itself ); at least as early as 1600,
2021-460: Was recorded primarily in Latin script . However, individual words written in Enochian script "appear sporadically throughout the manuscripts". There are 21 letters in the script; one letter appears with or without a diacritic dot. Dee mapped these letters of the "Adamical alphabet" onto 22 of the letters of the English alphabet, treating U and V as positional variants (as was common at the time) and omitting
2068-413: Was reportedly received through Kelley. These texts comprise 48 poetic verses with English translations, which in Dee's manuscripts are called Claves Angelicae , or Angelic Keys . Dee was apparently intending to use these Keys to open the "Gates of Understanding" represented by the magic squares in Liber Loagaeth : I am therefore to instruct and inform you, according to your Doctrine delivered, which
2115-463: Was spelled as both he and hee in the same sentence in Shakespeare's plays and elsewhere. Certain key orthographic features of Early Modern English spelling have not been retained: Most consonant sounds of Early Modern English have survived into present-day English; however, there are still a few notable differences in pronunciation: The following information primarily comes from studies of
2162-463: Was the result of his reception during the 17th and the 18th centuries, which directly contributes to the development of Standard English . Shakespeare's plays are therefore still familiar and comprehensible 400 years after they were written, but the works of Geoffrey Chaucer and William Langland , which had been written only 200 years earlier, are considerably more difficult for the average modern reader. The orthography of Early Modern English
2209-700: Was used by Adam in Paradise to name all things. The term "Enochian" comes from Dee's assertion that the Biblical patriarch Enoch had been the last human (before Dee and Kelley) to know the language. According to Tobias Churton in his text The Golden Builders , the concept of an Angelic or antediluvian language was common during Dee's time. If one could speak the language of angels, it was believed one could directly interact with them. In 1581, Dee mentioned in his personal journals that God had sent "good angels" to communicate directly with prophets. In 1582, Dee teamed up with
#348651