Misplaced Pages

#712287

44-433: Among The Democracy Collaborative's chief programs is Community Wealth Building, "an alternative economic model which uses the power of democratic participation to drive equitable development and ensure wealth is retained locally." Examples of Community Wealth Building projects include Cleveland, OH, Preston, UK, Chicago, IL, and Preston, England. Britain's Labour Party has created a Community Wealth Building unit, which stresses

88-461: A company 's employees own shares in that company (or in the parent company of a group of companies). US employees typically acquire shares through a share option plan. In the UK, Employee Share Purchase Plans are common, wherein deductions are made from an employee's salary to purchase shares over time. In Australia it is common to have all employee plans that provide employees with $ 1,000 worth of shares on

132-489: A co-operative legal entity) from employee ownership (where ownership is typically held as a block of shares on behalf of employees using an employee ownership trust, or company rules embed mechanisms for distributing shares to employees and ensuring they remain majority shareholders). Employee Share Ownership Plans (ESOPs) became widespread for a short period in the UK under the government of Margaret Thatcher , particularly following

176-439: A distribution from the plan when they leave the company. They can roll the amount over into an IRA, as can participants in any qualified plan. There is no requirement for a private sector employer to provide retirement savings plans for employees. Some studies conclude that employee ownership appears to increase production and profitability and improve employees' dedication and sense of ownership. ESOP advocates maintain that

220-675: A loan, called a "leveraged ESOP", can provide a tax-advantaged means for the company to raise capital. According to a pro-ESOP organization, at least 75% of ESOPs are, or were at some time, leveraged. According to citing ESOP Association statistics as cited in. In addition, ESOPs can be attractive instruments of corporate succession, allowing a retiring shareholder to diversify the company of stock while deferring capital gains taxes indefinitely. Company insiders face additional conflicts of interest in connection with an ESOP's purchase of company stock, which most often features company insiders as sellers and in connection with decisions about how to vote

264-436: A plan specifically meant to be for retirement security. In contrast, they maintain that it may not be a serious problem for an ESOP or other options, which they say are meant as wealth-building tools, preferably to exist alongside other plans. Nonetheless, ESOPs are regulated as retirement plans, and they are presented to employees as retirement plans, just like 401(k) plans. ESOPs and 401(k)s are both retirement plans subject to

308-469: A result, were more likely to offer additional diversified retirement plans alongside their ESOPs. Opponents to ESOP have criticized these pro-ESOP claims and say many of the studies are conducted or sponsored by ESOP advocacy organizations and criticizing the methodologies used. Critics argue that pro-ESOP studies did not establish that ESOPs results in higher productivity and wages. ESOP advocates agree that an ESOP alone cannot produce such effects; instead,

352-402: A significant degree of employee ownership, influence or control, but most public service mutuals identify themselves as social enterprises rather than employee owned. A worker cooperative is a cooperative owned and self-managed by its workers. It is a type of employee owned company that operates according to the international values of co-operation and adheres to an additional code, beyond

396-406: A tax free basis. Such plans may be selective or all-employee plans. Selective plans are typically only made available to senior executives. All-employee plans offer participation to all employees (subject to certain qualifying conditions such as a minimum length of service). Most corporations use stock ownership plans as a form of an employee benefit . Plans in public companies generally limit

440-458: Is a majority employee-owned company. This might arise through an employee-buyout. This can be set up through an employee ownership trust . Employee-owned companies are totally or significantly owned (directly or indirectly) by their employees. Different forms of employee ownership, and the principles that underlie them, have contributed to the emergence of an international social enterprise movement. A public service mutual, by definition, has

484-458: Is an initiative that seeks to expand employee ownership in the United States. The Democracy Collaborative initiative hopes to help create 50 million employee owners by the year 2050. Marjorie Kelly, Director of Special Projects, Distinguished Senior Fellow, cofounder of Business Ethics magazine. Employee ownership Employee stock ownership , or employee share ownership , is where

SECTION 10

#1732855056713

528-425: Is particularly common in the technology sector but also companies in other industries, such as Whole Foods Market , WinCo Foods , and Starbucks . In his 2020 presidential campaign, Bernie Sanders proposed that 20% of stocks in corporations with over $ 100 million in annual revenue be owned by the corporation's workers. Employee Stock Ownership Plan An Employee Stock Ownership Plan ( ESOP ) in

572-535: Is that investors should diversify their investments across many companies, industries, geographic locations, etc. Moreover, ESOPs concentrate workers' retirement savings in the stock of the same company on which they depend for their wages and current benefits, such as health insurance, worsening the non-diversification problem. High-profile examples illustrate the problem. Employees at companies such as Enron and WorldCom lost much of their retirement savings by overinvesting in company stock in their 401(k) plans, but

616-607: The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). While similar in some ways, the plans also have notable differences. These differences can form a strength: Businesses that offer both an ESOP and a 401(k), as 93.6 percent of The ESOP Association's members do, can offer the best of both plans to their employees. Because ESOPs are the only retirement plans allowed by law to borrow money, they can be attractive to company owners and managers as instruments of corporate finance and succession. An ESOP formed using

660-515: The Transport Act 1985 , which deregulated and then privatised bus services. Councils seeking to protect workers ensured that employees accessed shares as privatisation took place, but employee owners soon lost their shares as they were bought up and bus companies were taken over. The disappearance of stock plans was dramatic. In the United States, there is a widespread practice of employee stock ownership. It began with industrial companies and today

704-527: The 250,000 employee supermarket chain Publix Supermarkets , Hy-Vee , McCarthy Building Company, WinCo Foods , environmental consulting firm Citadel Environmental Services, Inc., and Harpoon Brewery . Today, most private U.S. companies that are operating as ESOPs are structured as S corporations ESOPs (S ESOPs). According to The ESOP Association , a national trade association based in Washington, DC,

748-630: The ESOP must be combined with worker empowerment through participatory management and other techniques. Critics point out that no study has separated the effects of those techniques from the effects of an ESOP; that is, no study shows that innovative management cannot produce the same (claimed) effects without an ESOP. In some circumstances, ESOP plans were designed that disproportionately benefit employees who enrolled earlier by accruing more shares to early employees. Newer employees, even at stable and mature ESOP companies can have limited opportunity to participate in

792-491: The Next System Project "an ambitious multi-year initiative aimed at thinking boldly about what is required to deal with the systemic challenges the United States faces now and in coming decades.". At its launch in 2015, its aims were co-signed by over 350 academics and leaders who pledged to work towards building "a new political economy that takes us beyond the current system that is failing all around us." Fifty by Fifty

836-402: The U.S. and the UK there is a widespread practice of sharing this kind of ownership broadly with employees through plans in which participation is offered to all employees. The tax rules for employee share ownership vary widely from country to country. Only a few, most notably the U.S., the UK, and Ireland have significant tax laws to encourage broad-based employee share ownership. For example, in

880-525: The U.S. there are specific rules for Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs). In the UK there are two all-employee tax advantaged plans that enable employees to acquire shares: the Share Incentive Plan and the Sharesave share option plan. Varieties of employee share ownership plan (including associated cash based incentive plans) include: Direct purchase plans simply allow employees to buy shares in

924-559: The United States is a defined contribution plan, a form of retirement plan as defined by 4975(e)(7)of IRS codes, which became a qualified retirement plan in 1974. It is one of the methods of employee participation in corporate ownership. According to an analysis of data provided by the United States Department of Labor , there are approximately 6,237 companies in America with an ESOP. Notable U.S. employee-owned corporations include

SECTION 20

#1732855056713

968-773: The company can choose to have the trust borrow money to buy stock (also known as a leveraged ESOP, with the company making contributions to the plan to enable it to repay the loan). Generally, almost every full-time employee with a year or more of service who worked at least 20 hours a week is in an ESOP. The United States ESOP model is tied to the unique US system encouraging private retirement savings plans and tax policies that reflect that goal. That makes it difficult to compare to other tax codes from other nations. Most private US companies operating as an ESOP are structured as S corporation ESOPs (S ESOPs). The United States Congress established S ESOPs in 1998, to encourage and expand retirement savings by giving millions more American workers

1012-451: The company creates, with limited exceptions in various countries. Restricted stock and its close relative restricted stock units give employees the right to acquire or receive shares, by gift or purchase, once certain restrictions, such as working a certain number of years or meeting a performance target, are met. Phantom stock pays a future cash bonus equal to the value of a certain number of shares. Stock appreciation rights provide

1056-421: The company with their own money. In several countries, there are special tax-qualified plans that allow employees to buy stock either at a discount or with matching shares from the company. For instance, in the U.S., employee stock purchase plans enable employees to put aside after-tax pay over some period of time (typically 6–12 months) then use the accumulated funds to buy shares at up to a 15% discount at either

1100-547: The company. Employee ownership can be seen as a business model in its own right, in contrast to employee share ownership which may only provide selected employees with shares in their company and an insignificant overall shareholding. In the UK organisations such as the Employee Ownership Association (EOA), Scottish Enterprise , Wales Co-operative Centre and Co-operatives UK play an active role in promoting employee ownership. An employee controlled company

1144-684: The core international principles, focused on democracy and participation in the workplace. The most celebrated (and studied) case of a group of companies based wholly on co-operative principles is the Spanish Mondragon Cooperative Corporation . Spanish law, however, requires that members of the Mondragon Corporation are registered as self-employed and are not employees. This further differentiates this type of co-operative ownership (in which self-employed owner-members each have one voting share, or shares are controlled by

1188-552: The employee, enable the employee to purchase stock, which may be at a discount, or grant employees stock options. Shares allocated to employees may have a holding period before the employee takes ownership of the shares (known as vesting). The vesting of shares and the exercise of a stock option may be subject to individual or business performance conditions. Various types of employee stock ownership plans are common in most industrial and some developing countries. Executive plans are designed to recruit and reward senior or key employees. In

1232-399: The federal government. Also, the study found that total output was equivalent to 1.7 percent of 2010 U.S. GDP. $ 93 billion (or 0.6 percent of GDP) came directly from S ESOPs, while output in supported industries totaled $ 153 billion (or 1.1 percent of GDP). In a U.S. ESOP, just as in every other form of qualified pension plan, employees do not pay taxes on the contributions until they receive

1276-519: The founding business plan and culture after the founders have left. Generally, the most senior employees own a majority stake and represent the leading voice in the company that employs them. They may be required to sell back the shares upon leaving the company. A number of countries have introduced tax advantaged share or share option plans to encourage employee share ownership. To facilitate employee stock ownership, companies may allocate their employees with stock , which may be at no upfront cost to

1320-514: The importance of municipal ownership, i.e. "taking direct responsibility for providing local public services" to produce an "economy owned and governed by the local community will serve that community rather than distant corporate interests." Community-Wealth.org is a Democracy Collaborative project that seeks to facilitate conversation and creation of more equitable wealth distribution in American communities. The Democracy Collaborative's website calls

1364-455: The key variable in securing these claimed benefits is to combine an ESOP with a high degree of worker involvement in work-level decisions (employee teams, for instance). Employee stock ownership can increase the employees' financial risk if the company does badly. ESOPs, by definition, concentrate workers' retirement savings in the stock of a single company. Such concentration is contrary to the central principle of modern investment theory, which

Democracy Collaborative - Misplaced Pages Continue

1408-764: The main form of employee ownership have considerably more in retirement assets than comparable employees in non-ESOP firms. The most comprehensive of the studies, a report on all ESOP firms in Washington state, found that the retirement assets were about three times as great, and the diversified portion of employee retirement plans was about the same as the total retirement assets of comparable employees in equivalent non-ESOP firms. The Washington study, however, showed that ESOP participants still had about 60% of their retirement savings invested in employer stock. Wages in ESOP firms were also 5-12% higher. National data from Joseph Blasi and Douglas Kruse at Rutgers shows that ESOP companies are more successful than comparable firms and, perhaps as

1452-551: The most common reason for establishing an ESOP is to buy stock from the owners of a closely held company. Many closely held companies have little or no succession plan in place. As a result, the day a founder or primary shareholder leaves the business often results in significant adverse consequences for the company, the employees, and the exiting owner. ESOPs offer transitional flexibility that can facilitate succession planning. Founders and main shareholders can sell to ESOPs all of their shares at one time, or percentages of their shares on

1496-494: The opportunity to have equity in the companies where they work. ESOP advocates credit S ESOPs with providing retirement security, job stability and worker retention, by the claimed culture, stability and productivity gains associated with employee-ownership. A study of a cross-section of Subchapter S firms with an Employee Stock Ownership Plan shows that S ESOP companies performed better in 2008 compared to non-S ESOP firms, paid their workers higher wages on average than other firms in

1540-813: The presence of an ESOP itself causes any positive effects for companies or workers. One study estimates that the net US economic benefit from S ESOP savings, job stability and productivity totals $ 33 billion per year. A study released in July 2012 found that S corporations with private employee stock ownership plans added jobs over the last decade more quickly than the overall private sector. A 2013 study found that in 2010, 2,643 S ESOPs directly employed 470,000 workers and supported an additional 940,000 jobs, paid $ 29 billion in labor income to their own employees, with $ 48 billion in additional income for supported jobs, and tax revenue initiated by S ESOPs amounted to $ 11 billion for state and local governments and $ 16 billion for

1584-448: The price at the time of purchase or the time when they started putting aside the money, whichever is lower. In the U.K., Share Incentive Plans allow employee purchases that can be matched directly by the company. Stock options give employees the right to buy a number of shares at a price fixed at grant for a defined number of years into the future. Options, and all the plans listed below, can be given to any employee under whatever rules

1628-422: The program, as a large portion of the shares may have already been allocated to longstanding employees. ESOP advocates often maintain that employee ownership in 401(k) plans, as opposed to ESOPs, is problematic. About 17% of total 401(k) assets are invested in company stock, more in those companies that offer it as an option (although many do not). ESOP advocates concede that it may be an excessive concentration in

1672-399: The right to the increase in the value of a designated number of shares, usually paid in cash but occasionally settled in shares (this is called a "stock–settled" SAR). Employee ownership is a way of running a business that can work for different sized businesses in diverse sectors. Employee ownership requires employees to own a significant and meaningful stake in their company. The size of

1716-557: The same industries, contributed more to their workers' retirement security, and hired workers when the overall U.S. economy was pitched downward and non-S ESOP employers were cutting jobs. Scholars estimate that annual contributions to employees of S ESOPs total around $ 14 billion. Critics say, however, that such studies fail to control for factors other than the existence of the ESOP, such as participatory management strategies, worker education, and pre-ESOP growth trends in individual companies. They maintain that no studies have shown that

1760-459: The schedule of their choosing. The transition in leadership, therefore, can occur as quickly or slowly as the owner wishes. Like other tax-qualified deferred compensation plans, ESOPs must not discriminate in their operations in favor of highly compensated employees, officers, or owners. In an ESOP, a company sets up an employee benefit trust that is funded by contributing cash to buy company stock or contributing company shares directly. Alternately,

1804-433: The shareholding must be significant. This is accepted as meaning where 25 percent or more of the ownership of the company is broadly held by all or most employees (or on their behalf by a trust ). There are three basic forms of employee ownership: In addition, the employees' stake must give employees a meaningful voice in the company's affairs by it underpinning organisational structures that promote employee engagement in

Democracy Collaborative - Misplaced Pages Continue

1848-444: The shares of stock held by the ESOP but not yet allocated to participants' accounts. In a leveraged ESOP, such unallocated shares often far outnumber allocated shares for many years after the leveraged transaction. This is a timeline of significant events in the development of ESOPs as a financial instrument, as well as some of the key personalities involved in developing the basic concepts, laws and organizations related to ESOPs in

1892-500: The specific companies were not employee-owned. Enron, Polaroid and United Airlines , all of which had ESOPs when they went bankrupt, were C corporations . Most S corporation ESOPs offer their employees at least one qualified retirement savings plan like a 401(k) in addition to the ESOP, allowing for greater diversification of assets. Studies in Massachusetts, Ohio, and Washington State show that on average, employees participating in

1936-417: The total number or the percentage of the company's stock that may be acquired by employees under a plan. Compared with worker cooperatives or co-determination , employee share ownership may not confer any meaningful control or influence by employees in governing and managing the corporation. In the United States, private companies often use employee share ownership to maintain the political feasibility of

#712287