Misplaced Pages

#971028

25-468: Calstone is a former tithing and manor in Wiltshire , England, lying southeast of Calne and adjacent to Calstone Wellington , in the civil parish of Calne Without . The area was almost certainly part of the large Calne estate held by the king in the 10th century or earlier. By 1066, three estates had been granted away: one which became Calstone manor, another which became Calstone Wellington manor, and

50-484: A hundred , and English husting for a single household. Sound changes in the prehistory of English are responsible for the first part of the word looking so different from the word ten . In the West Germanic dialects which became Old English , n had a tendency to elide when positioned immediately before a th . The noun is not to be confused with the verb to tithe , its present participle tithing , nor

75-549: A manor . The later break-down of the feudal system did not detract from this, as the introduction of Justices of the Peace lead to petty sessions displacing many of the administrative and judicial functions of the manorial courts. By the Reformation , civil parishes had replaced the manor as the most important local administrative concept, and tithings came to be seen as a parish subdivision. Frankpledge eventually evolved into both

100-470: A teothung or tything , i.e. a " thing (assembly) of ten men". The tything was under the leadership of a tythingman chosen from among them, with the responsibility of producing in the court of justice any man of their number who was summoned. The first tythings were entirely voluntary associations, being groups formed through the mutual consent of their free members. The aspect of the system which initially prevented its being made universally compulsory

125-548: A private frith-borh, consisting of dependents instead of the freemen of the public frith-borhs. These two systems, with many variations, existed side by side; but there was a general tendency for the freemen to get fewer and for the lords to grow more powerful. The tithing eventually became a territorial unit, part of the vill, while the eventual merger of borh and tithing underpinned the Norman frankpledge system. In its ultimate form, if an individual did not appear when summoned to court

150-500: A separate and wealthy kingdom into the Middle Ages. While Wessex and Mercia eventually grouped their hundreds into Shires , Kent grouped hundreds into lathes . Sussex , which had also been a separate kingdom , similarly grouped its hundreds into rapes . The different choice of terminology continued to the level of the tithing; in Kent, parts of Surrey , and Sussex, the equivalent term

175-519: A third which was later called Blunt's. The Domesday survey in 1086 recorded three landholdings at Calestone , with altogether 62 households and four mills. The remainder, later called the 'black land' of Calstone, was kept by the Crown until 1194 when it was granted to a new owner and became the manor and parish of Blackland . Calstone village was divided between Calne and Calstone Wellington parishes. A church had been built at Calstone by 1301, presumably on

200-492: A tithing of Calne. In 1890, both Calstone Wellington and Calstone were absorbed into the newly created Calne Without parish. For the history of the church and its parish, see Calstone Wellington . [REDACTED] Media related to Calstone at Wikimedia Commons Tithing The noun tithing breaks down as ten + thing , which is to say, a thing (an assembly) of the households who live in an area that comprises ten hides . Comparable words are Danish herredthing for

225-461: The Early Middle Ages and High Middle Ages . The essential characteristic was the compulsory sharing of responsibility among persons connected in tithings . This unit, under a leader known as the chief-pledge or tithing -man, was then responsible for producing any man of that tithing suspected of a crime. If the man did not appear, the entire group could be fined . While women, clergy, and

250-504: The Jury system and the petty constabulary , but tithings themselves had lost their practical significance, and fell into disuse. Despite this, active tithings continued to be found in some parts of rural England well into the 19th century, and tithings and hundreds have never been formally abolished. Frankpledge Frankpledge was a system of joint suretyship common in England throughout

275-521: The Blunt's estate; from 1600 the ecclesiastical parish was called Calstone Wellington, and the village later took this name also. Since at least 1889, the name Calstone has not been used for the settlement on Ordnance Survey maps. The Wiltshire Victoria County History lists the landowners, including the Barons Zouche from the early 14th century to the 1550s, and from 1572 Sir Lionel Duckett (1511–1587). He

SECTION 10

#1732859168972

300-404: The act of tithing , though they partly share the same origin. The term originated in the 10th century, when a tithing meant the households in an area comprising ten hides. The heads of each of those households were referred to as tithingmen ; historically they were assumed to all be males, and older than 12 (an adult, in the context of the time). Each tithingman was individually responsible for

325-399: The actions and behaviour of all the members of the tithing, by a system known as frankpledge . If a person accused of a crime was not forthcoming, his tithing was fined; if he was not part of the frankpledge, the whole town was subject to the fine. Unlike areas dominated by Wessex , Kent had been settled by Jutes rather than Saxons , and retained elements of its historical identity as

350-573: The clear anticipation of frankpledge; others consider the 12th-century commentators were reading back into earlier times the later concept, and that the borh system was much less rigid and comprehensive than frankpledge. On this view, William the Conqueror , with the revival of murdrum with respect to the French invaders, played an important role in systematically and universally making the tithing adopt compulsory frankpledge, so as to increase and consolidate

375-456: The family's Bowood landholdings until 1954, when the Marquesses began to sell off farms, while retaining some property in the area. An estate later called Calstone Wylye was detached from Calstone manor in the 12th century, and reunited with Calstone when it was bought by Stephen Duckett in 1585. In the 19th century, Calstone Wellington was recognised as a civil parish, while Calstone remained

400-452: The other, both served to undermine the local system; as too did greater agrarian differentiation and mobility – a process exacerbated by the impact of the Black Death . Nevertheless, the system survived in places into the 15th century, although increasingly superseded by local constables – the former chief pledges – operating under the justices of the peace : their oversight represented

425-458: The power of the Normans and to establish a more stringent policy. The borh was a system of surety whereby individuals – a family member, a master for servants, a lord for dependents – became responsible for producing others in court in event of misdemeanors. At the same time, late Anglo-Saxon society increasingly shared responsibility in legal matters in groups of ten. The group was referred to as

450-531: The remaining members of the tithing could swear an oath to the effect that they had no hand in the escape of the summoned man: they would otherwise be held responsible for the deeds of the fugitive and could be forced to pay any fines his actions had incurred. This examination of the members of the tything before the court is the origin of the phrase "view of frankpledge". Frankpledge did not at first take place in Wales or eight Northern and border counties, but elsewhere

475-544: The remains of view of frankpledge . Ultimately, the principle behind frankpledge still remains in force, in England and Wales, with regard to riots . Until the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 , members of each civil parish were, collectively, directly responsible for repaying any damages due to a riot within their area. Under the Act (and its 2016 replacement ), the damages are indirectly levied on

500-599: The richer freemen were exempt, otherwise all men over 12 years of age were organised in the system for mutual surety. The first mention of frankpledge comes in 1114–1118, with the Leges Henrici Primi ; but 12th-century figures like William of Malmesbury were keen to link it to pre-Norman times, and to the laws of Canute the Great . Some historians have indeed seen in the Anglo-Saxon frith-borh (literally "peace-pledge" )

525-445: The tourn, or the private takeover of view of frankpledge by lords or boroughs, were valued privileges; while conversely the 1217 Magna Carta sought explicitly to restrict what the sheriff could legitimately demand of frankpledge. The frankpledge system began to decline in the 14th century. The extension of centralised royal administration on the one hand, and the increasing appropriation of view of frankpledge by private landlords of

SECTION 20

#1732859168972

550-493: Was a borgh , borow , or borough (not to be confused with borough in its more usual sense of a chartered or privileged town); their equivalent to the tithingman was therefore a borsholder , borough-holder or headborough . The Norman Conquest introduced the feudal system, which quickly displaced the importance of the hundred as an administrative unit. With the focus on manorial courts for administration and minor justice, tithings came to be seen as subdivisions of

575-556: Was a wealthy London merchant, Lord Mayor of London in 1572–1573, who supported early voyages to Africa which paved the way for the slave trade in later centuries. His son Stephen and seven other Duckett descendants were returned as MP for the rotten borough of Calne, the small number of electors being under the influence of the lord of the manor. In 1763, Thomas Duckett sold much land, including Calstone, to William Petty, 2nd Earl of Shelburne (from 1784 Marquess of Lansdowne and Viscount Calne and Calston). These lands remained part of

600-477: Was common in the area under the Danelaw , and in the south and southwest of England . By the time of Edward I, however, the sheriff's tourn also began to appear in shires like Northumberland and Cumberland. The bi-annual view of frankpledge which was carried out by the sheriff involved payment of a tithing penny to the sheriff, as well as other opportunities for profit including fines: for this reason exemption from

625-419: Was that only landed individuals could be forced to pay any fines which might be put upon the group: the landless man was worthless as a member of a frith-borh, for the law had little hold over a man who had no land to forfeit and no fixed habitation. So the landless man was compelled by law to submit to a manorial lord , who was held responsible for the behaviour of all his "men"; his estate became, so to speak,

#971028