Misplaced Pages

Bruges Group

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The Groupe de Bruges is a European think-tank specializing in agriculture and rural development . One of its founding members, Dacian Cioloş , served as European Commissioner for Agriculture from 2010 to 2014 and later as Prime Minister of Romania.

#413586

4-407: Bruges Group may refer to Groupe de Bruges , a European agricultural policy think tank Bruges Group (United Kingdom) , a British eurosceptic think tank Topics referred to by the same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Bruges Group . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change

8-708: The CAP ". Source: The Groupe de Bruges was created in 1995 by Edgard Pisani and Bertrand Hervieu as a Europe-wide successor to the French Groupe de Seillac (1992-5). The latter had been formed in the context of the debate on reform of the European Union 's Common Agricultural Policy in the early 1990s. Through its life, the Groupe has enjoyed funding from the Swiss Charles-Leopold Mayer foundation . In 1996

12-568: The Groupe published the book Agriculture at a Turning Point in France, Spain and the Netherlands. A second edition of the book was published in 2002 in those countries as well as Italy and Bulgaria. On at least two occasions, the Groupe has attempted to influence public opinion through open letters to the European Parliament . Members of the group took part in the agriculture-related work of

16-481: The link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bruges_Group&oldid=856030448 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Groupe de Bruges The Groupe summarizes its own mission as "to provide an independent, positive and constructive criticism of

#413586