An = Anum , also known as the Great God List , is the longest preserved Mesopotamian god list, a type of lexical list cataloging the deities worshiped in the Ancient Near East , chiefly in modern Iraq . While god lists are already known from the Early Dynastic period , An = Anum most likely was composed in the later Kassite period .
197-396: Anu ( Akkadian : 𒀭𒀀𒉡 ANU , from 𒀭 an "Sky", "Heaven") or Anum , originally An ( Sumerian : 𒀭 An ), was the divine personification of the sky , king of the gods , and ancestor of many of the deities in ancient Mesopotamian religion . He was regarded as a source of both divine and human kingship, and opens the enumerations of deities in many Mesopotamian texts. At
394-484: A Šurpu commentary, Anu's Elamite counterpart was Jabru . However, according to the god list An = Anum , a god bearing the name Yabnu ( ia-ab-na ) was the "Enlil of Elam." Wilfred G. Lambert concluded that Jabru and Yabnu should be considered two spellings of the same name. While Jabru is described as an Elamite god in Mesopotamian sources, no known Elamite texts mention him. In the god list Anšar = Anum , one of
591-516: A calque of Antu. An equivalence between Anu and Ahura Mazda has been proposed based on the assumption that non-Persian subjects of the Achaemenid Empire might have viewed the latter simply as a sky god. Anu was chiefly associated with the city of Uruk , where he was one of the major deities next to Inanna (Ishtar) and Nanaya, but before the end of the Neo-Babylonian period his cult had
788-673: A lingua franca of the empire, rather than it being eclipsed by Akkadian. Texts written 'exclusively' in Neo-Assyrian disappear within 10 years of Nineveh 's destruction in 612 BC. Under the Achaemenids , Aramaic continued to prosper, but Assyrian continued its decline. The language's final demise came about during the Hellenistic period when it was further marginalized by Koine Greek , even though Neo-Assyrian cuneiform remained in use in literary tradition well into Parthian times. Similarly,
985-635: A voiced alveolar trill /r/ but its pattern of alternation with ⟨ ḫ ⟩ suggests it was a fricative (either uvular /ʁ/ or velar /ɣ/ ). In the Hellenistic period, Akkadian ⟨ r ⟩ was transcribed using the Greek ρ, indicating it was pronounced similarly as an alveolar sound (though Greeks may also have perceived a uvular trill as ρ). Several Proto-Semitic phonemes are lost in Akkadian. The Proto-Semitic glottal stop *ʔ , as well as
1182-413: A certainty, as the most direct reference, the phrase aia DINGIR ù-TU-zu in a hymn, has two possible translations: "your father An who engendered you," or "your divine father who engendered you." Additionally, some references to Anu as the father of a specific deity might be metaphorical or indirect, as in the case of Nanna (typically a son of Enlil and Ninlil ) or Nungal . Anu could also be regarded as
1379-517: A comparison with other Semitic languages, and the resulting picture was gradually amended using internal linguistic evidence from Akkadian sources, especially deriving from so-called plene spellings (spellings with an extra vowel). According to this widely accepted system, the place of stress in Akkadian is completely predictable and sensitive to syllable weight . There are three syllable weights: light (ending in -V); heavy (ending in -V̄ or -VC), and superheavy (ending in -V̂, -V̄C or -V̂C). If
1576-418: A desire not to have Anu as Nisaba's father," and instead makes her the daughter of Irḫan , in this context identified with Ea and understood as a cosmic river, "father of the gods of the universe." While Inanna (Ishtar) could be regarded as the daughter of Anu and Antu, the view that she was a daughter of Nanna and Ningal is agreed to be the most commonly attested tradition regarding her parentage. While
1773-553: A fourth tradition, more sparsely attested, his wife was the goddess Nammu instead. In addition to listing his spouses and children, god lists also often enumerated his various ancestors, such as Anshar or Alala . A variant of one such family tree formed the basis of the Enūma Eliš . Anu briefly appears in the Akkadian Epic of Gilgamesh , in which his daughter Ishtar (the Akkadian counterpart of Inanna) persuades him to give her
1970-508: A group of deities possibly originating in Dilmun , the Sebitti and other groups of seven (as well as the closely connected Elamite goddess Narundi ), Amurru , the divine representation of Amorite nomads , and his wife Ashratum , the deified hero Gilgamesh and his companion Enkidu , and a number of names belonging to deities of uncertain identity, assumed to be of very minor importance, and
2167-409: A later god list, K 2100, whose Adad section contains "Subarian" (Hurrian) Teshub and Kassite Buriyash. The tablet ends with a group of various gods mostly associated with Adad or Shamash, such as Shullat and Hanish , though with some exceptions which were instead linked with Ea, Nisaba or Ishtar . It has been proposed that what unified these deities was their possible Syrian origin, but this view
SECTION 10
#17328491191152364-459: A learning aid, they were also important for the gradual modern decipherment of cuneiform . The oldest known god list is usually called the Fara god list, though it is also known from copies from Abu Salabikh and Uruk . 466 theonyms can be read from the surviving fragments, though it is estimated that it originally contained 560. While it begins with the head of the pantheon, Enlil (or, in some of
2561-676: A lengthy span of contact and the prestige held by the former, Sumerian significantly impacted Akkadian phonology, vocabulary and syntax. This mutual influence of Akkadian and Sumerian has also led scholars to describe the languages as a Sprachbund . Akkadian proper names are first attested in Sumerian texts in the mid-3rd millennium BC, and inscriptions ostensibly written in Sumerian but whose character order reveals that they were intended to be read in East Semitic (presumably early Akkadian) date back to as early as c. 2600 BC . From about
2758-459: A line listing Bizilla , who was closely associated with Nanaya. A major lacuna in which they were presumably originally located is followed by a list of figures associated with the steppe and by a short section dedicated to Gazbaba . A short section is dedicated to Išḫara (who also appears in the Enlil section and in the end of tablet III. ) It is followed by one focused on Manzat . The final entry
2955-452: A list of collective terms for deities. Tablet VII lists various names of Marduk and of his throne bearer Mandanu . Most of the names are not attested in any other sources, and are likely to be esoteric scholarly inventions. Richard L. Litke considered it a late addition. However, Ryan D. Winters notes that despite focusing on Marduk, it is so far known only from Assyrian copies, which is likely to reflect an early date of incorporation into
3152-480: A list referred to as "shorter An = Anum " or "smaller An = Anum ", which begins with the same first line, but it only documents alternate names of major deities, rather than their families and courts. However, it is assumed that it was at least partially derived from its more extensive namesake. The first modern publication of fragments of An = Anum occurred in 1866 and 1870 in volumes II and III of Henry Rawlinson 's Cuneiform Inscriptions of Western Asia , though
3349-404: A locative ending in -um in the singular and the resulting forms serve as adverbials . These forms are generally not productive, but in the Neo-Babylonian the um -locative replaces several constructions with the preposition ina . In the later stages of Akkadian, the mimation (word-final -m ) and nunation (dual final -n ) that occurred at the end of most case endings disappeared, except in
3546-474: A major centre of Mesopotamian civilization during the Akkadian Empire ( c. 2334 –2154 BC). It was written using the cuneiform script , originally used for Sumerian , but also used to write multiple languages in the region including Eblaite , Hurrian , Elamite , Old Persian and Hittite . The influence of Sumerian on Akkadian went beyond just the cuneiform script; owing to their close proximity,
3743-461: A matter of debate. A single Neo-Assyrian god list known from three copies appears to combine Ki and Urash into a single deity, ki-uraš . An early incorrect reading of this entry was ki-ib , which early Assyriologist Daniel David Luckenbill assumed to be a reference to the Egyptian god Geb , an identification now regarded as impossible. The goddess Antu is also attested as a wife of Anu. Her name
3940-452: A narrower scope than theirs. It is often assumed that the so-called "White Temple," which dates back to the Uruk IV period (3500–3100 BCE) was his original cult center, and it is even sometimes referred to as the "Anu ziggurat " in modern literature. However, there is no evidence that Anu was actually worshipped in this structure. His presence in the oldest texts remains a matter of debate, as it
4137-407: A new edition partially relying on them started in 2018, culminating in publication of an annotated An = Anum by Ryan D. Winters, with George and Manfred Krebernik [ de ] as editors, in 2023. In addition to Lambert's research, it also utilized additional materials provided by Miguel Civil , Anmar Fadhil, Enrique Jiménez, Zsombor Földi, Tonio Mitto and Jeremiah Peterson. An = Anum
SECTION 20
#17328491191154334-548: A new theological system developed in the same city under Seleucid rule, resulting in Anu being redefined as an active deity. As a result he was actively worshipped by inhabitants of the city in the final centuries of the history of ancient Mesopotamia. Multiple traditions regarding the identity of Anu's spouse existed, though three of them— Ki , Urash , and Antu —were at various points in time equated with each other, and all three represented earth, similar to how he represented heaven. In
4531-582: A new ziggurat, the Ešarra (Sumerian: "house of the universe"), the biggest such structure known from Mesopotamia and second biggest overall after the Elamite complex at Chogha Zanbil . Its name was likely borrowed from a similar structure in Nippur dedicated to Enlil. Multiple explanations have been proposed for the elevation of Anu, though they must remain speculative due to lack of direct evidence. It has been argued that it
4728-482: A number of children and courtiers of Ningirsu whose names are poorly preserved or lost. Juxtaposition of various deities originating in this area is not exclusive to An = Anum , as attested in a small fragment of an otherwise unknown god list found in Nippur. The next sub-section is centered on medicine goddesses ( Ninisina , Ninkarrak , Nintinugga , Gula ) and their families (including Pabilsag , Damu and Gunura ). They are in turn followed by sections dedicated to
4925-480: A scepter and a ring-shaped object, are known from textual sources. A text from the Kassite period explains that Anu's symbol was a horned crown on a pedestal. It is attested on some kudurru (boundary stones), where it is typically present in the upper half of the decoration, below the symbols of Ishtar , Shamash and Sin , who were depicted on the very top of such monuments due to representing celestial bodies. Anu
5122-403: A separate East Semitic language. Because Akkadian as a spoken language is extinct and no contemporary descriptions of the pronunciation are known, little can be said with certainty about the phonetics and phonology of Akkadian. Some conclusions can be made, however, due to the relationship to the other Semitic languages and variant spellings of Akkadian words. The following table presents
5319-645: A similar list of temples and various theological commentaries. It has also been proposed that it was the basis for the remodeling of the pantheon of Uruk in the Seleucid period. God lists were a type of cuneiform lexical lists , the oldest genre of texts next to administrative documents. However, the first god lists emerged only around 600 years after the emergence of writing, in the Early Dynastic period . Like other lexical lists, they were presumably copied by scribes as exercises. Due to their original purpose as
5516-422: A similar trinity in his inscriptions to show he was in control of their major cult centers. After conquering Rim-Sin I's kingdom, Hammurabi of Babylon started to invoke Anu and Enlil, though not Ea, in his own formulas. Similar evidence is not available from the reign of Samsu-iluna , who only invoked Anu and Enlil in a single inscription most likely pertaining to the reconquest of southern cities. Later kings of
5713-484: A time, according to William W. Hallo only three first tablets were finished by 1998. Subsequently Lambert also compiled his edition of tablet V. Lambert passed away in 2011 without ever publishing his edition, but Andrew R. George inherited his notes, and subsequently cataloged them with Junko Taniguchi. However, due to their age Lambert's commentaries on the tablets were partially outdated and thus no longer suitable for publication without alterations. Preparations of
5910-422: A tradition in which Anu was a son of Enmesharra . In another text, Anu and Enlil receive their positions from this deity, not necessarily peacefully. Due to his connection with various ancestral deities, Anu could be occasionally associated with the underworld . One Assyrian explanatory text mentions Antu making funerary offerings for him. However, according to Julia Krul, it is impossible to tell how widespread
6107-487: A vast textual tradition of religious and mythological narrative, legal texts, scientific works, personal correspondence, political, civil and military events, economic tracts and many other examples. Centuries after the fall of the Akkadian Empire, Akkadian, in its Assyrian and Babylonian varieties, was the native language of the Mesopotamian empires ( Old Assyrian Empire , Babylonia , Middle Assyrian Empire ) throughout
Anu - Misplaced Pages Continue
6304-491: A written language, adapting Sumerian cuneiform orthography for the purpose. During the Middle Bronze Age (Old Assyrian and Old Babylonian period), the language virtually displaced Sumerian, which is assumed to have been extinct as a living language by the 18th century BC. Old Akkadian, which was used until the end of the 3rd millennium BC, differed from both Babylonian and Assyrian, and was displaced by these dialects. By
6501-609: Is PaRiStum (< *PaRiS-at-um ). Additionally there is a general tendency of syncope of short vowels in the later stages of Akkadian. Most roots of the Akkadian language consist of three consonants, called the radicals, but some roots are composed of four consonants, so-called quadriradicals. The radicals are occasionally represented in transcription in upper-case letters, for example PRS (to decide). Between and around these radicals various infixes , suffixes and prefixes , having word generating or grammatical functions, are inserted. The resulting consonant-vowel pattern differentiates
6698-462: Is a deity or deities designated by the logogram AN.INANNA. However, it has also been proposed that it represents not Anu and Inanna as a pair, as commonly assumed, but a specific manifestation of Inanna, Urkitum . Presently there is no agreement regarding this problem in scholarship and which deity or deities it refers to remains uncertain. In documents from the reign of the First Sealand dynasty ,
6895-403: Is an extinct East Semitic language that was spoken in ancient Mesopotamia ( Akkad , Assyria , Isin , Larsa , Babylonia and perhaps Dilmun ) from the third millennium BC until its gradual replacement in common use by Old Aramaic among Assyrians and Babylonians from the 8th century BC. Akkadian, which is the earliest documented Semitic language , is named after the city of Akkad ,
7092-481: Is commonly understood as a list documenting Akkadian equivalents of Sumerian gods in a manner similar to the process of interpretatio graeca , but according to Richard L. Litke this view is mistaken. The primary goal of the compilers of An = Anum was to clarify the familial relationships between deities, briefly describe their functions and characterize each god's household, rather than to provide Sumerian deities with Akkadian equivalents. The commentary, when present,
7289-452: Is defined as the Elamite counterpart of Enlil. It is additionally possible that a deity whose name is not preserved, identified as "Enlil of Subartu ", might be Hurrian Kumarbi . Ninhursag (Digirmah, Belet-ili) occupies the beginning of tablet II. Deities listed in her section include her husband Šulpae , her sons Panigingarra and Ashgi , the couple Lisin and Ninsikila , and various courtiers. The same tablet also contains
7486-442: Is divided into several varieties based on geography and historical period : One of the earliest known Akkadian inscriptions was found on a bowl at Ur , addressed to the very early pre-Sargonic king Meskiagnunna of Ur ( c. 2485 –2450 BC) by his queen Gan-saman, who is thought to have been from Akkad. The Akkadian Empire , established by Sargon of Akkad , introduced the Akkadian language (the "language of Akkad ") as
7683-579: Is etymologically an Akkadian feminine form of Anu. The god list An = Anum equates her with Ki, while a lexical text from the Old Babylonian period – with Urash. There is evidence that like the latter, she could be considered a goddess associated with the earth. She is already attested in the third millennium BCE, possibly as early as in the Early Dynastic period in a god list from Abu Salabikh , though no references to her are known from Uruk from before
7880-536: Is in Sumerian, rather than Akkadian, which is different from most lexical lists . The gods do not appear to be separated into strictly Sumerian and Akkadian columns. Furthermore, some gods are listed with no equivalents at all, for example Zababa , who was a well established deity. Some deities listed are not Sumerian or Akkadian, but Elamite , " Subarian " ( Hurrian ), or Gutian . The list documents many associations between deities and aspects of their character which are otherwise unknown. Explanations frequently use
8077-547: Is included in this section too. He is followed by Lahar , though the nature of the connection between them is not specified. While Sin and Shamash occur in the proximity of each other because they were viewed as father and son, Adad is most likely included on this tablet because of the well established connection between him and Shamash. The section dedicated to him includes his wife Shala , their children (such as Uṣur-amāssu ), as well as another weather god, Wer , though other foreign weather gods are absent, in contrast with
Anu - Misplaced Pages Continue
8274-595: Is known from an exorcism formula assumed to predate the Middle Babylonian period . There is no indication that this act of creation involved a second deity acting as Nammu's spouse. She appears in a variant of Anu's genealogy in An = Anum , though as remarked by Lambert, she was "pushed out (...) into a kind of appendix." Due to the sparse attestations of Nammu it is assumed today that she "was not generally acknowledged outside Eridu." A single prayer to Papsukkal might allude to
8471-409: Is marked by the Kassite invasion of Babylonia around 1550 BC. The Kassites, who reigned for 300 years, gave up their own language in favor of Akkadian, but they had little influence on the language. At its apogee, Middle Babylonian was the written language of diplomacy of the entire Ancient Near East , including Egypt ( Amarna Period ). During this period, a large number of loan words were included in
8668-451: Is mocked by her sister Athena , and is mildly rebuked by her father Zeus . Not only is the narrative parallel significant, but so is the fact that Dione's name is a feminization of Zeus's own, just as Antu is a feminine form of Anu . Dione does not appear throughout the rest of the Iliad , in which Zeus's consort is instead the goddess Hera . Burkert therefore concludes that Dione is clearly
8865-454: Is no evidence for close association between Nanshe and the moon god otherwise. Nin-MAR.KI is placed in the same section as well, but in contrast with earlier sources she is not identified as Nanshe's daughter, which might mean her placement reflected her link to cattle herding instead. The circle of the sun god includes his wife Aya , as well as two distinct groups of courtiers, deities of justice and deities of dreams. The cattle god Sakkan
9062-534: Is not universally accepted. Another possibility is that this subsection was incorporated from a list arranged based on lexical principles. Tablet IV documents the circle of Ishtar (Inanna). Due to its contents, it has been nicknamed "the Ištar tablet" by Richard L. Litke. It is less well preserved than other tablets, and full restoration is presently impossible. However, it can be estimated that it originally contained three to four times as many entries as her section in
9259-403: Is not yet identified as his son, in contrast with late sources. Other deities present on tablet II include courtiers of Enki, the river god Id , the fire god Gibil , and various minor deities associated with craftsmen and other professions, such as Ninagal . Part of this subsection was likely incorporated from an independent source arranged based on a lexical principle. Tablet III describes
9456-420: Is now considered to be a mistake. The Sumerian term used in it, é-gi 4 -a , equivalent of Akkadian kallatum , meant both " daughter-in-law " and "bride," but the latter meaning relied on the social practice of fathers picking the brides of their sons. As an epithet of goddesses, it denotes their status as a daughter-in-law of a specific deity. For example, Aya was often called kallatum due to her position as
9653-502: Is preserved on clay tablets dating back to c. 2500 BC . It was written using cuneiform , a script adopted from the Sumerians using wedge-shaped symbols pressed in wet clay. As employed by Akkadian scribes, the adapted cuneiform script could represent either (a) Sumerian logograms ( i.e. , picture-based characters representing entire words), (b) Sumerian syllables, (c) Akkadian syllables, or (d) phonetic complements . In Akkadian
9850-483: Is simply assumed. In later traditions, his father was usually Anshar , whose spouse was Kishar . Another tradition most likely regarded Alala and Belili as his parents. A larger group of his ancestors, arranged into multiple generations, is known from mythological and scholarly sources. Wilfred G. Lambert coined the term "Theogony of Anu" to refer to arrangements of these deities collectively. At least five versions are known from incantations, though in three out of five
10047-460: Is the deity giš-su 13 -ga , whose character is undefined, but who might be related to Nergal rather than Inanna. Tablet V begins with warrior deities associated with specific cities. They include the deified hero Lugalbanda and his wife Ninsun , Lugal-Marada , the tutelary god of Marad , the mongoose deity Ninkilim , the agricultural god Urash (his court includes Lagamal , in other lists present among underworld deities), Nitaḫ,
SECTION 50
#173284911911510244-496: Is then [awat+su] > /awatt͡su/ . In this vein, an alternative transcription of ⟨ š ⟩ is ⟨ s̱ ⟩, with the macron below indicating a soft (lenis) articulation in Semitic transcription. Other interpretations are possible. /ʃ/ could have been assimilated to the preceding /t/ , yielding /ts/ , which would later have been simplified to /ss/ . The rhotic ⟨ r ⟩ has traditionally been interpreted as
10441-465: Is uncertain if the cuneiform sign DINGIR present in them does not necessarily denote a specific god. Paul-Alain Beaulieu concludes that whether he appears in these sources is unprovable. There is also no indication that Eanna , "House of Heaven" (Sumerian: e 2 -anna; Cuneiform: 𒂍𒀭 E 2 .AN), the main temple of Uruk in historical times, was originally the abode of Anu alone, as sometimes proposed in
10638-470: Is unknown, Lahmu and Lahamu , derived from the name of a type of aquatic mythical creature, two deities whose names were written logographically as ALAM possibly representing another of the known pairs or associated with the underworld, and Enurulla and Ninurulla, the "lord" and "lady" of the "primeval city," whose inclusion in Anu's family tree most likely reflected "the importance of the city in ancient Mesopotamian thought." The genealogy of gods presented in
10835-493: The Enūma Eliš is a derivative of the lists of Anu's ancestors from earlier sources. The pairs listed in this composition are Apsu and Tiamat , Lahmu and Lahamu, and Anshar and Kishar. The first of them is not attested in any earlier sources. The god list An = Anum refers to Nammu as the "mother who gave birth to Heaven and Earth," ama-tu-an-ki , but as noted by Frans Wiggermann, the terms an and ki were most likely understood collectively in this case. A similar reference
11032-507: The An = Anum forerunner, which already listed more titles than the section of any other deity. Among the deities listed are Ninegal and various astral deities, such as Ninsianna and Kabta . Tablet IV also most likely originally included Dumuzi and Nanaya sub-sections, which are not preserved. A fragment which presumably originally contained the Nanaya section, which mentions Muati and Kanisurra , has been identified, in addition to
11229-523: The Bull of Heaven episode, the former tradition might simply indicate the existence of anti-Ishtar sentiment among compilers of this work. Simultaneously Anu does not play any major role and Inanna is the sole owner of Eanna in the myths about Enmerkar and Lugalbanda , other legendary kings of Uruk commonly referenced in Mesopotamian literature. A mythological tradition in which the Eanna originally belonged to Anu, but
11426-426: The Bull of Heaven so that she may send it to attack Gilgamesh . The incident results in the death of the Bull of Heaven and a leg being thrown at Ishtar's head. In another myth, Anu summons the mortal hero Adapa before him for breaking the wing of the south wind . Anu orders for Adapa to be given the food and water of immortality, which Adapa refuses, having been warned beforehand by Enki that Anu will offer him
11623-548: The Epic of Gilgamesh in which Ishtar comes before Anu after being rejected by Gilgamesh and complains to her mother Antu, but is mildly rebuked by Anu, is directly paralleled by a scene from Book V of the Iliad . In this scene, Aphrodite , who Burkert regards as the later Greek development of Ishtar, is wounded by the Greek hero Diomedes while trying to save her son Aeneas . She flees to Mount Olympus , where she cries to her mother Dione ,
11820-453: The Hellenistic period Anu might have been identified with Zeus , though this remains uncertain. Anu was a divine representation of the sky, as indicated by his name, which simply means "sky" in Sumerian . In Akkadian , it was spelled as Anu, and was written either logographically (AN) or syllabically ( a-nu(m) ). In Sumerian texts, unlike the names of other deities, his was never prefaced by
12017-550: The Louvre ) and from a small fragment from Nippur, but it is presumed it had wider circulation in the Old Babylonian period. It is usually assumed that An = Anum itself was composed in the Kassite period , The most probable date of composition is assumed to be the period between 1300 and 1100 BCE. The name of the list used in modern literature is based on its first line, explaining that the Sumerian name An corresponds to Akkadian Anum. Wilfred G. Lambert proposed that it originated in
SECTION 60
#173284911911512214-472: The Neo-Assyrian period . All three of these gods could be depicted in this form in the same reliefs. Ki , "earth," is well attested as Anu's spouse. Her name was commonly written without a divine determinative, and she was usually not regarded as a personified goddess. Another of Anu's spouses was Urash . According to Frans Wiggermann, she is his most commonly attested wife. She is well attested starting with
12411-650: The Neo-Babylonian or Late Babylonian period are known, but their provenance and precise dating are often uncertain. Both the list itself and various references to it are known from an archive from Seleucid Uruk. Some of the discovered copies of An = Anum slightly differ from each other. However, the differences are generally limited to spelling of individual names or to inclusion or exclusion of single lines, and there are no major cases of entire passages differing between copies. Early restorations sometimes confused fragments of An = Anum and An = Anu ša amēli , but
12608-534: The Northwest Semitic languages and South Semitic languages in its subject–object–verb word order, while the other Semitic languages usually have either a verb–subject–object or subject–verb–object order. Additionally Akkadian is the only Semitic language to use the prepositions ina and ana ( locative case , English in / on / with , and dative -locative case, for / to , respectively). Other Semitic languages like Arabic , Hebrew and Aramaic have
12805-458: The Old Babylonian period . The following table shows Proto-Semitic phonemes and their correspondences among Akkadian, Modern Standard Arabic and Tiberian Hebrew : The existence of a back mid-vowel /o/ has been proposed, but the cuneiform writing gives no good proof for this. There is limited contrast between different u-signs in lexical texts, but this scribal differentiation may reflect
13002-586: The Persian conquest of the Mesopotamian kingdoms contributed to the decline of Babylonian, from that point on known as Late Babylonian, as a popular language. However, the language was still used in its written form. Even after the Greek invasion under Alexander the Great in the 4th century BC, Akkadian was still a contender as a written language, but spoken Akkadian was likely extinct by this time, or at least rarely used. The last positively identified Akkadian text comes from
13199-478: The Sargonic period and continues to appear as a wife of Anu often until the Old Babylonian period . A different, male, deity named Urash served as the tutelary god of Dilbat . Wiggermann proposes that while Ki, as generally agreed, represented earth as a cosmogonic element, Urash was a divine representation of arable land . He suggests translating her name as " tilth ," though its etymology and meaning continue to be
13396-595: The consonants of the Akkadian language, as distinguished in Akkadian cuneiform. The reconstructed phonetic value of a phoneme is given in IPA transcription, alongside its standard ( DMG-Umschrift ) transliteration in angle brackets ⟨ ⟩ . Evidence from borrowings from and to Sumerian has been interpreted as indicating that the Akkadian voiceless non-emphatic stops were originally unaspirated, but became aspirated around 2000 BCE. Akkadian emphatic consonants are typically reconstructed as ejectives , which are thought to be
13593-400: The status absolutus (the absolute state ) and the status constructus ( construct state ). The latter is found in all other Semitic languages, while the former appears only in Akkadian and some dialects of Aramaic. The status absolutus is characterised by the loss of a noun's case ending (e.g. awīl < awīlum , šar < šarrum ). It is relatively uncommon, and is used chiefly to mark
13790-564: The "Standard Babylonian" version of the Epic of Gilgamesh , an astronomical text and the Hymn to the Queen of Nippur refer to her directly as Anu's daughter, according to Paul-Alain Beaulieu it is not impossible that these statements do not reflect parentage but merely indirect descent, with an implied genealogy in which Anu was the father of Enlil, grandfather of Nanna and great-grandfather of Inanna. Furthermore,
13987-400: The "archetypal vizier of the gods," was primarily associated with Inanna, but she could also be described as the sukkal (divine vizier, attendant deity) of Anu. The association between her and Anu is attested from the reign of Third Dynasty of Ur onward. Her role as a popular intercessory deity in Sumerian religion was derived from her position as a servant of major deities, which resulted in
14184-573: The 10th century BC when the Assyrian kingdom became a major power with the Neo-Assyrian Empire . During the existence of that empire, however, Neo-Assyrian began to turn into a chancellery language, being marginalized by Old Aramaic . The dominance of the Neo-Assyrian Empire under Tiglath-Pileser III over Aram-Damascus in the middle of the 8th century led to the establishment of Aramaic as
14381-556: The 1st century AD. The latest known text in cuneiform Babylonian is an astronomical almanac dated to 79/80 AD. However, the latest cuneiform texts are almost entirely written in Sumerian logograms. The Akkadian language began to be rediscovered when Carsten Niebuhr in 1767 was able to make extensive copies of cuneiform texts and published them in Denmark. The deciphering of the texts started immediately, and bilinguals, in particular Old Persian -Akkadian bilinguals, were of great help. Since
14578-454: The 21st century BC Babylonian and Assyrian, which were to become the primary dialects, were easily distinguishable. Old Babylonian, along with the closely related dialect Mariotic , is clearly more innovative than the Old Assyrian dialect and the more distantly related Eblaite language . For this reason, forms like lu-prus ('I will decide') were first encountered in Old Babylonian instead of
14775-541: The 25th century BC, texts fully written in Akkadian begin to appear. By the 20th century BC, two variant dialectic forms of the same language were in use in Assyria and Babylonia, known as Assyrian and Babylonian respectively. The bulk of preserved material is from this later period, corresponding to the Near Eastern Iron Age . In total, hundreds of thousands of texts and text fragments have been excavated, covering
14972-471: The Assyrian scribe Kidin-Sin during the reign of Tiglath-Pileser I according to its colophon . This indicates that while Babylonian in origin, An = Anum already reached Assyria by the final decades of the second millennium BCE. Kidin-Sin wrote that he relied on "old tablets" containing the list. An = Anum continued to be copied in the first millennium BCE. Neo-Assyrian fragments are known almost exclusively from Nineveh. 23 fragments dated to either
15169-514: The Babylonian Enûma Eliš , the gods praise Marduk, shouting "Your word is Anu!" Although Anu was a very important deity, his nature was often ambiguous and ill-defined. The number of myths focusing on him is small and he was only rarely actively worshiped. His position has therefore been described as that of a "figurehead" and "otiose deity" by Assyriologist Paul-Alain Beaulieu . Wilfred G. Lambert characterized his position as head of
15366-550: The Bīt Rēš complex was eventually destroyed by a fire. It was rebuilt as a fortress, and while a small temple was built next to it in the Parthian period, most likely Mesopotamian deities were no longer worshipped there. According to a Greek inscription dated to 111 CE, the deity worshipped in Uruk in the early first millennium was apparently otherwise unknown Gareus , whose temple was built during
15563-507: The Eanki and the Egalankia, possibly located in Uruk. In the Neo-Babylonian period , Anu only had a small sanctuary in Uruk. He has been described as a comparatively minor deity in the religious practice of this period. While multiple Neo-Babylonian archives from Uruk have been excavated and published, so far research revealed only a small number of people bearing theophoric names invoking Anu before
15760-476: The Night , whose oldest copies do not mention this concept yet. In Seleucid Uruk, Anu's astral role was extended further, and in a text composed in year 71 of the Seleucid era (216/215 BCE) he is described as responsible for the entire firmament. Furthermore, two circumpolar stars started to be called the "Great Anu and Antu of Heaven," and received offerings as if they were deities. They typically appear alongside
15957-477: The Ur III rulers mentioning the Eanna, even though he does appear in offering lists. However, royal inscriptions from the Old Babylonian period indicate that Anu was believed to dwell in the Eanna. In the Old Babylonian version of the Epic of Gilgamesh , Eanna is described only as the dwelling of Anu, but the later "Standard Babylonian" version associates it both with Ishtar and Anu. It has been proposed that similar to
16154-505: The Urukean priest-scholars convinced their new kings of the similarity between the two gods (...), or even that they genuinely believed that Anu and Zeus were the same." No direct evidence of any of these possibilities is available. According to Walter Burkert , a researcher of ancient Greek religion, direct literary parallels exist between Anu and the Zeus. According to him, the scene from Tablet VI of
16351-567: The Weidner god lat times contain additional columns with explanations of the names. A copy from Ugarit adds columns listing Ugaritic and Hurrian deities. In the Old Babylonian period , god lists were often the product of strictly local scribal traditions, and distinct ones are known from Nippur , Isin , Uruk , Susa , Mari and possibly Ur . These local lists show a growing tendency to organize deities based on theological, rather than lexical, considerations. Each of them most likely documented
16548-404: The archaeological evidence is typical of Anatolia rather than of Assyria, but the use both of cuneiform and the dialect is the best indication of Assyrian presence. Old Babylonian was the language of king Hammurabi and his code , which is one of the oldest collections of laws in the world. (see Code of Ur-Nammu .) Old Assyrian developed as well during the second millennium BC, but because it
16745-485: The belief that she was capable of mediating with her masters, both with Inanna and with Anu, on behalf of human petitioners. Another deity who could be placed in the same role was Ilabrat . In texts from the second millennium BCE, Ninshubur and Ilabrat coexisted and in at least some cases Ninshubur's name, treated as masculine, was a logographic spelling of Ilabrat's, for example in Mari in personal names. It has been proposed that
16942-550: The biggest clay tablets known. Tablet I starts with Anu , Antu and their ancestors. It includes their various servants as well. A sub-section is dedicated to Papsukkal and his circle, including his wife Amasagnudi . Saĝkud appears among Anu's servants as well. The Enlil section, which follows the Anu one, begins with his ancestors, the so-called Enki-Ninki deities , and includes his wife Ninlil , primordial deities Lugaldukuga (explained as Enlil's father) and Enmesharra , as well as various courtiers, among them
17139-451: The boundaries of each Way were at 17°N and 17°S. The division is best attested in the astronomical treatise MUL.APIN . The date of its composition is unknown, though it is known that it is more recent than the Old Babylonian period, and the oldest reference to the tripartite division of the sky comes from a document from the thirteenth century BCE, a version of the so-called Prayer to the Gods of
17336-441: The canon of An = Anum . According to Wilfred G. Lambert, it should be considered an appendix loosely connected with the rest of the composition, similar to the case of the final tablet of the standard edition of Epic of Gilgamesh . It has been suggested that further additional tablets might have followed VII. However, this proposal relies entirely on a single damaged colophon, and surviving examples of tablet VII indicate it
17533-424: The case of Anu and Zeus but also remains uncertain. Beaulieu instead proposes that Anu's rise was in part inspired by a network of syncretism associations between him, Anshar , who was also worshiped in Uruk, and the Assyrian head god Ashur , who in Assyria could be identified with the latter. However, Julia Krul points out there is no certainty that Anshar was actually understood as Ashur in Uruk, let alone that he
17730-523: The center of Uruk's religious life and economy, and made the creation of a new system centered on the worship of Anu and his spouse of Antu , rather than Ishtar and Nanaya, possible. The details of its early development are not well understood, as Mesopotamian texts from the later years of Achaemenid rule pertaining to temple administration and other religious affairs are scarce. The city as a whole did not decline, and it served various administrative and military purposes, as attested for example in documents from
17927-428: The changed in favor of Anu accelerated during the reign of Xerxes I . After a rebellion of the northern Babylonian cities against Persian rule in 484 BCE, this king seemingly reorganized the traditional structure of Mesopotamian clergy, and while Uruk did not rebel, it was not exempt from changes. It has been proposed that the older priests, who were often connected to the northern cities and were predominantly involved in
18124-416: The city of Babylon. However, according to Jeremiah Peterson documents from Old Babylonian Nippur indicate that both the An = Anum forerunner and other texts showing the beginning of the development of new lists fleshing out the relations between deities were also in circulation among the theologians of that city. While the forerunner has only 473 entries, over 2000 names are listed in An = Anum (2123 in
18321-445: The copies preserve all the material on a single tablet, with a brief summary marked by pairs of horizontal lines indicating the end of each originally separate section. Copies of long works such as god lists or literary composition inscribed on a single tablet are known as dubgallu or tupkallu , or as "monster tablets". YBC 2401 is one such example, and measures 30.5 × 39.5 centimeters (roughly 12 × 15 inches), which makes it one of
18518-426: The copies, Anu and Enlil), the gods are otherwise arranged based on lexical, rather than theological criteria, for example deities whose names start with the sign NIN are grouped together. Due to many of the names from it being otherwise unknown, little can be said about its contents otherwise. It has been argued that despite cases of theological and lexical subgroups being possible to discern, no principle guided
18715-518: The correct translation of the sign AN in this case instead. The so-called Babylonian Temple List most likely composed in the first millennium BCE mentions no temples of Anu, though with the exception of Larsa, Ur and Eridu the southernmost cities are generally poorly represented in it. A single liturgical text indicates that a temple of Anu called Ekinamma possibly existed in Kesh . The hymn BRM IV 8 lists ten names of temples associated with him, including
18912-529: The cult of Anu appears to be flourishing. A new temple, dedicated jointly to him and Antu, the Bīt Rēš (head temple) was constructed at some point and became the new center of the city s religious life. Oldest dated attestation of this structure comes from a text which was apparently originally compiled during "the reign of Seleukos and Antiochos," presumably either Seleucus I Nicator and Antiochus I Soter (292/1 – 281/0 BCE) or of Antiochus I and his son Seleucus (280/79 – 267/6 BCE). The Bīt Rēš complex also included
19109-413: The cult of Ishtar, were replaced by a number of powerful local families dedicated to Anu. Julia Krul suggests that their members likely planned to expand the scope of Anu's cult in the Neo-Babylonian period already, but were unable to do so due to the interests of the kings, who favored Marduk as the head of the pantheon. Xerxes' retaliation against the clergy of Uruk resulted in the collapse of Eanna as
19306-429: The daughter of Inanna are not common, and it is possible this epithet was not treated literally, but rather as an indication of closeness between them. Furthermore, Nanaya could also be regarded as a daughter of the male Urash, and was sometimes specifically called his firstborn daughter. In late sources, Nisaba could be called a daughter of Anu. However, as noted by Wilfred G. Lambert at least one text "seems to imply
19503-399: The daughter-in-law of Sin and wife of his son Shamash . A goddess named Ninursala is described as Anu's dam-bànda , possibly to be translated as "concubine," in the god list An = Anum . According to Antoine Cavigneaux and Manfred Krebernik, she is also attested in an Old Babylonian god list from Mari . Many deities were regarded as Anu's descendants, and he could be called "the father of
19700-420: The deities in order of seniority, alongside their courts, but the rest of the list does not appear to follow similar principles. It is possible that it was a result of adding groups of deities from originally distinct texts to An = Anum without rearranging them. Jeremiah Peterson remarks that the reliance on theological factors is nonetheless more evident in An = Anum than in any other known god list. Some of
19897-437: The development of this genealogy. It has additionally been argued that a variant writing of Amurru's name, AN.MARTU (AN.AN.MAR.TU) represents a conjoined deity consisting of Amurru and Anu. However, according to Paul-Alain Beaulieu it most likely should simply be read as the Akkadian phrase Il Amurrim , "the god of Amurru ," as indicated by a Hurrian translation known from a bilingual text from Emar , e-ni a-mu-ri-we , which has
20094-479: The dialects of Akkadian identified with certainty so far. Some researchers (such as W. Sommerfeld 2003) believe that the Old Akkadian variant used in the older texts is not an ancestor of the later Assyrian and Babylonian dialects, but rather a separate dialect that was replaced by these two dialects and which died out early. Eblaite , formerly thought of as yet another Akkadian dialect, is now generally considered
20291-477: The dingir sign, referred to as the "divine determinative" in modern literature, since it would result in unnecessary repetition, as the same sign was also read as an . In addition to referring to sky and heaven and to Anu, the same sign could also be read as dingir or ilu , the generic term "god" in, respectively, Sumerian and Akkadian. As the number 60 was associated with him, the corresponding numeral could represent his name, and in esoteric texts by extension also
20488-479: The dyad of Enlil and Ea (Enki) replaced the triad containing Anu. The only god list known from the Sealand archives does not mention Anu at all, and simply begins with Enlil. He is nonetheless attested in a few offering lists. Furthermore, it is possible the name of the king Akurduana might be theophoric and should be translated as "raging flood of Anu," though this remains uncertain and the ordinary word "heaven" might be
20685-401: The earlier stages of the language, the dual number is vestigial, and its use is largely confined to natural pairs (eyes, ears, etc.). Adjectives are never found in the dual. In the dual and plural, the accusative and genitive are merged into a single oblique case . Akkadian, unlike Arabic , has only "sound" plurals formed by means of a plural ending. Broken plurals are not formed by changing
20882-406: The elevation of Anu were god lists, such as An = Anum, which provided the evidence needed to justify both this change and other examples of restructuring the city pantheon. Most likely the growing interest in astronomy and astrology among the clergy also played a role. While it is assumed that religious activity in Uruk continued through the late Seleucid and early Parthian periods, a large part of
21079-530: The father of various demons. Lamashtu was viewed his daughter. A group of seven, eight or nine Asakku demons called "the sons of Anu" is also known. In a text referred to as the Nippur Compendium by modern researchers, Latarak is identified both as an Asakku and as a son of Anu. The Epic of Erra describes the Sebitti as his creations, subsequently given to the eponymous god as weapons. The earliest texts do not discuss Anu's origin, and his preeminence
21276-439: The first millennium BCE a change occurred, and Anu was reinvented by theologians as an active god. In Mesopotamian astronomy , the sky was divided into three zones, with the stars closest to the pole belonging to Enlil and those close to the equator to Ea . The stars located between these two zones were the domain of Anu. All three were referred to as the "Ways" of the respective deities. Astronomer John G. Rogers assumes that
21473-484: The first millennium BCE, and even in the Neo-Babylonian period she only appears in a single letter. However, she is attested as Anu's wife in documents from the Seleucid period from this city, and at that point in time became its lead goddess alongside her husband. An inscription on a votive figurine of king Lugal-kisalsi (or Lugal-giparesi), who ruled over Uruk and Ur in the twenty-fourth century BCE, refers to Nammu as
21670-420: The first one bears stress. A rule of Akkadian phonology is that certain short (and probably unstressed) vowels are dropped. The rule is that the last vowel of a succession of syllables that end in a short vowel is dropped, for example the declinational root of the verbal adjective of a root PRS is PaRiS- . Thus the masculine singular nominative is PaRS-um (< *PaRiS-um ) but the feminine singular nominative
21867-437: The first pair are Duri and Dari, and the last – Alala and Belili. A slightly different version is known from the god list An = Anum , though there are differences between individual copies as well. Lambert proposes that initially at least two different traditions existed, but they were later combined into a list patterned on those associated with Enlil. At least in some cases, long lists of divine ancestors were meant to help avoid
22064-508: The food and water of death. In the Hurrian myths about Kumarbi, known chiefly from their Hittite translations, Anu is a former ruler of the gods, who was overthrown by Kumarbi , who bit off his genitals and gave birth to the weather god Teshub . It is possible that this narrative was later the inspiration for the castration of Ouranos in Hesiod 's Theogony . It has also been proposed that in
22261-528: The fricatives *ʕ , *h , *ḥ are lost as consonants, either by sound change or orthographically, but they gave rise to the vowel quality e not exhibited in Proto-Semitic. The voiceless lateral fricatives ( *ś , *ṣ́ ) merged with the sibilants as in Canaanite , leaving 19 consonantal phonemes. Old Akkadian preserved the /*ś/ phoneme longest but it eventually merged with /*š/ , beginning in
22458-475: The god Zababa , whose rise was likely rooted simply in the presence of the word sukkal in his name. In the context of the so-called "antiquarian theology" relying largely on god lists, which developed in Uruk under Achaemenid and Seleucid rule, he was fully identified with Ninshubur and thus became Anu's sukkal and one of the eighteen major deities of the city. He was not worshiped in this city earlier. According to
22655-452: The goddess of writing, Nisaba , and her husband Haia , Enlil's sukkal Nuska and his wife Sadarnunna , the scribe goddess Ninimma , the exorcist goddess Ningirima , defined as Enlil's sister, and the beer goddess Ninkasi . A separate sub-section is dedicated to Ninurta , his wife Nin-Nibru , and his own courtiers. The Syrian god Dagan also appears in the Enlil section alongside his wife Shalash , as well as Išḫara . Iabnu
22852-467: The great gods." It has been argued that Anu's primary role in the Sumerian pantheon was as an ancestor figure, and that the term Anunna (also Anunnaki, Anunna-anna), which referred to various Mesopotamian deities collectively, means "offspring of Anu" and designates specific gods as particularly prominent. Ishkur (Adad), the weather god, was consistently regarded as a son of Anu. While some literary texts may refer to Enlil as his father instead, this view
23049-495: The head of the hinterland pantheon, Dagan , and the head of the coastal pantheon, El, were regarded as analogous to Enlil, rather than Anu. Monti additionally describes a god he refers to as "Shamem" as the most direct equivalent to Anu in the Canaanite pantheon and as a personification of the sky, but this name was a title of the weather god Baal which developed into a separate deity, Baalshamin , and Aramaic texts indicate that he
23246-423: The hierarchy of deities recognized in the respective localities. Fragments of many further god lists are known, chiefly from Assyrian copies, but their origin and scope are not fully understood. Some of them focus on geographical distribution on deities, and mention many foreign gods as a result. While it was common to arrange the names of gods in lists, no analogous scholarly practice is attested for demons, and
23443-501: The hymn in mention also addresses her as a daughter of the moon god. Ishtaran was at least sometimes described as a son of Anu and Urash, and as a result the Old Babylonian Nippur god list associates him with Uruk . He also could be referred to as Anu Rabu (AN.GAL), "the great Anu," but Wouter Henkelman proposes this epithet is instead a sign that a connection existed between him and the Elamite god Napirisha , whose name
23640-586: The implications of divine incest, which were hard to reconcile with strong incest taboos attested from various periods of Mesopotamian history. Duri and Dari likely represented time understood as a primary force in creation, and their names are derived from an Akkadian phrase meaning "ever and ever." The pairing of Alala and Belili was most likely based entirely on both of their names being iterative , and elsewhere they occur in unrelated roles independently from each other. Further attested pairs of deities regarded as ancestors of Anu include Egur and Gara, whose character
23837-466: The incantation series Utukku Lemnutu outright states they were not counted in the "census of Heaven and Earth", indicating the reasons behind this might have been theological. A list regarded as the forerunner of An = Anum has been dated to the Old Babylonian period . It is sometimes called the "Genouillac god list" after its original publisher, Henri de Genouillac . It is only known from one copy of unknown provenance (tablet AO 5376, presently in
24034-752: The language from Northwest Semitic languages and Hurrian . However, the use of these words was confined to the fringes of the Akkadian-speaking territory. From 1500 BC onwards, the Assyrian language is termed Middle Assyrian. It was the language of the Middle Assyrian Empire . However, the Babylonian cultural influence was strong and the Assyrians wrote royal inscriptions, religious and most scholarly texts in Middle Babylonian, whereas Middle Assyrian
24231-454: The last syllable is superheavy, it is stressed, otherwise the rightmost heavy non-final syllable is stressed. If a word contains only light syllables, the first syllable is stressed. It has also been argued that monosyllabic words generally are not stressed but rather function as clitics . The special behaviour of /V̂/ syllables is explained by their functioning, in accordance with their historical origin, as sequences of two syllables, of which
24428-572: The later Bronze Age, and became the lingua franca of much of the Ancient Near East by the time of the Bronze Age collapse c. 1150 BC . However, its gradual decline began in the Iron Age, during the Neo-Assyrian Empire when in the mid-eighth century BC Tiglath-Pileser III introduced Imperial Aramaic as a lingua franca of the Assyrian empire. By the Hellenistic period , the language
24625-404: The latter being used for long vowels arising from the contraction of vowels in hiatus. The distinction between long and short is phonemic , and is used in the grammar; for example, iprusu ('that he decided') versus iprusū ('they decided'). There is broad agreement among most Assyriologists about Akkadian stress patterns. The rules of Akkadian stress were originally reconstructed by means of
24822-473: The latter list is now considered to be a distinct work of Mesopotamian scholarship and differs from An = Anum due to having three columns, with the third providing an explanation of the first two. There is no indication it depended on material from An = Anum , as very few alternate names of deities listed overlap, and when they do, the sequence differs. An = Anum ša amēli is also more syncretic than An = Anum . An = Anum should also be differentiated from
25019-484: The latter matches the order of these deities in the former, making it plausible that three missing lines referred to Ninkasi , Ninmada and Ugelamma. Paul-Alain Beaulieu proposed in 1992 that the changes in the religion of Seleucid Uruk were inspired by adherence to An = Anum . The entire pantheon of the city was restructured, with Ishtar , Nanaya and their court, encompassing deities such as Uṣur-amāssu , surpassed in prominence by Anu and Antu . While Anu
25216-424: The list as a whole, and it was meant to compile theonyms without necessarily providing additional information and the nature of the individual deities or relationships between them. No god lists are known from between the end of the Early Dynastic period and the late third or early second millennium BCE, when the so-called " Weidner list " was compiled, though it is assumed that they were still being created through
25413-434: The locative. Later, the nominative and accusative singular of masculine nouns collapsed to -u and in Neo-Babylonian most word-final short vowels were dropped. As a result, case differentiation disappeared from all forms except masculine plural nouns. However, many texts continued the practice of writing the case endings, although often sporadically and incorrectly. As the most important contact language throughout this period
25610-404: The major gods and goddesses ( Anu , Enlil , Ninhursag , Enki , Sin , Shamash , Adad and Ishtar ) and their courts, arranged according to theological principles, but tablets V and VI do not appear to follow a clear system, and tablet VII is a late appendix listing the names of Marduk and one of his courtiers. Many other works of ancient scholarship were influenced by An = Anum , including
25807-437: The moon god Sin (unusually not identified directly as a son of Enlil ), the sun god Shamash (Utu) and the weather god Adad (Ishkur). The circle of Sin includes his wife Ningal and various deities associated with cattle herding. Nanshe and deities associated with her, including her husband Nindara , who precedes her, separate his section from that of Shamash. While An = Anum appears to equate Nindara with Sin, there
26004-405: The most complete known copy). However, this should not be understood as analogous to the presence of 2000 individual deities, as many of the names are instead epithets or alternate names. It is nonetheless the most extensive known god list. Copies from the second millennium BCE are known from Nippur, Babylon, Nineveh , Assur and Hattusa . YBC 2401, the most complete exemplar, was copied by
26201-556: The name of their spouse, children, and finally servants, if any were known. In some cases the chief attendant deity, so-called sukkal , is listed before the children. Seemingly only the best established deities had a sukkal . The number and precise designation of various divine servants varies, and there seemingly was no standard composition of a divine court, though some titles, such as "doorkeeper" (NI.GAB) or "counselor" ( gu 4 .DÚB), recur more often than others. An = Anum consists of seven tablets. The initial four tablets list
26398-554: The names of Anu is Hamurnu, derived from the Hurrian word referring to heaven. However, while Hurrians did worship earth and heaven , they did not regard them as personified deities. Furthermore, Anu appears under his own name in Hurrian mythology. While Robert Monti argues that the Canaanites seem to have ascribed Anu's attributes to El , no equivalents of Anu were actually present in the pantheons of various ancient Syrian states. Both
26595-526: The older la-prus . While generally more archaic, Assyrian developed certain innovations as well, such as the "Assyrian vowel harmony ". Eblaite was even more so, retaining a productive dual and a relative pronoun declined in case, number and gender. Both of these had already disappeared in Old Akkadian. Over 20,000 cuneiform tablets in Old Assyrian have been recovered from the Kültepe site in Anatolia . Most of
26792-516: The oldest realization of emphatics across the Semitic languages. One piece of evidence for this is that Akkadian shows a development known as Geers's law , where one of two emphatic consonants dissimilates to the corresponding non-emphatic consonant. For the sibilants, traditionally ⟨ š ⟩ has been held to be postalveolar /ʃ/ , and ⟨ s ⟩, ⟨ z ⟩, ⟨ ṣ ⟩ analyzed as fricatives; but attested assimilations in Akkadian suggest otherwise. For example, when
26989-464: The original meaning of the root. The middle radical can be geminated, which is represented by a doubled consonant in transcription, and sometimes in the cuneiform writing itself. The consonants ʔ , w , j and n are termed "weak radicals" and roots containing these radicals give rise to irregular forms. Formally, Akkadian has three numbers (singular, dual and plural) and three cases ( nominative , accusative and genitive ). However, even in
27186-841: The other Semitic languages in the Near Eastern branch of the Afroasiatic languages , a family native to Middle East , Arabian Peninsula , parts of Anatolia , parts of the Horn of Africa , North Africa , Malta , Canary Islands and parts of West Africa ( Hausa ). Akkadian is only ever attested in Mesopotamia and neighboring regions in the Near East. Within the Near Eastern Semitic languages, Akkadian forms an East Semitic subgroup (with Eblaite and perhaps Dilmunite ). This group differs from
27383-470: The other readings of the sign DINGIR. Anu was regarded as the supreme god, and the major god lists, such as An = Anum , place him on top of the pantheon. He could be described as the king of the gods, and was believed to be the source of all legitimate power, who bestowed the right to rule upon gods and kings alike. The highest god in the pantheon was said to possess the anûtu or anuti ( a-nu-ti ), which means "heavenly power" or more literally Anuship. In
27580-440: The other seven major celestial bodies which were known to Mesopotamian astronomers in the late first millennium BCE: the sun , the moon , and the planets Nebēru ( Jupiter ), Dilbat ( Venus ), Šiḫṭu ( Mercury ), Kayamānu ( Saturn ), and Ṣalbatānu ( Mars ). Anu almost never appears in Mesopotamian artwork and has no known recognizable anthropomorphic iconography. References to him holding typical symbols of divine kingship, such as
27777-556: The pantheon as "always somewhat nominal" and noted that " Enlil in practice wielded greater power" according to the Mesopotamians. Beaulieu similarly states that functionally the active head god was Enlil and later Marduk in Babylonia and Ashur in Assyria , not Anu. Evidence from Lagash indicates that at least in the Early Dynastic period, during the reign of Eannatum and Entemena , it
27974-431: The past. It was already associated with Inanna in the fourth millennium BCE, and her role as the tutelary goddess of Uruk most likely dates at least to this period as well. Julia Krul proposes that even if Anu was already worshiped in the Uruk period, he likely had to share the Eanna temple with Inanna. The oldest texts do not mention the Eanna yet, and it is not certain if a sanctuary most likely called "Ean" attested in them
28171-463: The possessive suffix -šu is added to the root awat ('word'), it is written awassu ('his word') even though šš would be expected. The most straightforward interpretation of this shift from tš to ss , is that ⟨ s, ṣ ⟩ form a pair of voiceless alveolar affricates /t͡s/ /t͡sʼ/ , ⟨ š ⟩ is a voiceless alveolar sibilant /s/ , and ⟨ z ⟩ is a voiced alveolar affricate or fricative /d͡z/~/z/ . The assimilation
28368-427: The predicate of a nominal sentence, in fixed adverbial expressions, and in expressions relating to measurements of length, weight, and the like. An %3D Anum While often mistakenly described as a list of Sumerian deities and their Akkadian equivalents, An = Anum is focused on presenting the familial relationships between deities, as well as their courts and spheres of influence. The first four tablets list
28565-461: The prepositions bi/bə and li/lə (locative and dative, respectively). The origin of the Akkadian spatial prepositions is unknown. In contrast to most other Semitic languages, Akkadian has only one non-sibilant fricative : ḫ [x] . Akkadian lost both the glottal and pharyngeal fricatives, which are characteristic of the other Semitic languages. Until the Old Babylonian period, the Akkadian sibilants were exclusively affricated . Old Akkadian
28762-411: The prison goddess Manungal , the underworld goddess Ereshkigal , a group of gods associated with snakes and the underworld ( Ninazu , Ningishzida , Tishpak , Inshushinak and Ištaran ), the pair Lugal-irra and Meslamta-ea , who were also underworld deities, but have no apparent connection with the preceding gods, and a number of minor figures of similar character, such as Lugala'abba ("lord of
28959-515: The prologue of the Kumarbi myth, and therefore that Alalu and Anu should not be regarded as father and son in Hurrian sources. Kumarbi is directly referred to as Alalu's "seed" in the Song of Kummarbi . He also addresses himself as "Alalu's son" in another myth belonging to the same cycle, Song of Ḫedammu . The order of deities in international treaties also supports the notion that Alalu and Kumarbi belong to
29156-442: The recognition of this aspect of his character was, and broad statements about Anu being outright identified with deities of the underworld in the theology of Seleucid Uruk should be generally avoided. While it is often assumed that Hurrian Alalu was the father of Anu, similar to his Mesopotamian counterpart Alala, and that Kumarbi was in turn viewed as Anu's son, it has also been argued that two separate lineages of gods appear in
29353-466: The reign of Ur-Nammu . Their location is uncertain, but Andrew R. George tentatively proposes Ur . In the following Isin-Larsa period , kings of Isin made no reference to Anu in their year formulas. Rim-Sîn I of Larsa revived the tradition and invoked the traditional triad in them, possibly to show that he planned to control all of southern Babylonia. It has been also suggested that one of his predecessors, Gungunum , invoked Anu, Enlil and Nanna as
29550-668: The reign of Vologases I of Parthia in a foreign style resembling Roman buildings . The final cuneiform text from the site is an astronomical tablet dated to 79 or 80 CE, possibly the last cuneiform text written in antiquity. It is assumed that the last remnants of the local religion and culture of Uruk disappeared by the time of the Sasanian conquest of Mesopotamia, even though the worship of individual deities might have outlasted cuneiform writing. Akkadian language Akkadian ( / ə ˈ k eɪ d i ən / ə- KAY -dee-ən ; Akkadian: 𒀝𒅗𒁺𒌑(𒌝) , romanized: Akkadû(m) )
29747-480: The reign of Darius II. It has even been described as the biggest and most prosperous city in Mesopotamia in the final centuries of the first millennium BCE. It is assumed that Anu's ascent to the top of the official pantheon was complete by the year 420 BCE. In theophoric names, he already predominates in economic documents from the reigns of Artaxerxes I and Darius II . In sources from the following Seleucid period,
29944-524: The reign of Nabonidus, with a total of five being mentioned in known documents according to the highest estimate. The most historically notable example is Anu-aḫu-iddin, who was the governor of Uruk during the reign of Nabopolassar . The number of such names started to rise during the reign of Nabonidus . Documents from the reign of Darius I show further growth, though names invoking chiefly northern Babylonian deities, as well as Nanaya, Ishtar and Shamash (from Larsa) remain numerous. It has been proposed that
30141-457: The same dynasty only infrequently mentioned the pair, most likely as a part of ceremonial formulas meant to tie their reigns to a longer tradition. In Assyria , Anu appears for the first time in an inscription of Shamshi-Adad I , who described him as one of the gods who bestowed kingship upon him. A temple of Adad which he built in Assur later came to be dedicated to both the weather god and Anu. It
30338-467: The same epithet designates Enlil instead. A text known from copies from Shuruppak and Ebla only refers to Anu as the divine "king of Uruk." In later inscriptions from the period of the Old Babylonian Empire , Enlil could be mentioned both alongside Anu or on his own as the head of the pantheon. A trinity consisting of both of them and Ea is also attested. Only in Uruk in the final centuries of
30535-401: The same line, but Anu does not. Hittitologist Gary Beckman notes that the two lines were seemingly only united with the birth of the new generation of gods ( Teshub , Tashmishu and others), a result of Kumarbi's castration of Anu, which resulted in a "burden," Anu's seed, being placed inside him. The process is poetically compared to production of bronze from tin and copper. Ninshubur ,
30732-472: The same meaning. Texts from the reign of Rim-Sîn I and Samsu-iluna identify the love goddess Nanaya as a daughter of Anu. This notion is also present in an inscription of Esarhaddon . Paul-Alain Beaulieu speculates that Nanaya developed in the context of a local theological system in which Anu and Inanna were viewed as a couple, and that she was initially regarded as their daughter. However, as noted by Olga Drewnowska-Rymarz, direct references to Nanaya as
30929-483: The same syllable in the same text. Cuneiform was in many ways unsuited to Akkadian: among its flaws was its inability to represent important phonemes in Semitic, including a glottal stop , pharyngeals , and emphatic consonants . In addition, cuneiform was a syllabary writing system—i.e., a consonant plus vowel comprised one writing unit—frequently inappropriate for a Semitic language made up of triconsonantal roots (i.e., three consonants plus any vowels). Akkadian
31126-463: The same time, his role was largely passive, and he was not commonly worshipped. It is sometimes proposed that the Eanna temple located in Uruk originally belonged to him, rather than Inanna , but while he is well attested as one of its divine inhabitants, there is no evidence that the main deity of the temple ever changed, and Inanna was already associated with it in the earliest sources. After it declined,
31323-404: The script practically became a fully fledged syllabic script , and the original logographic nature of cuneiform became secondary , though logograms for frequent words such as 'god' and 'temple' continued to be used. For this reason, the sign AN can on the one hand be a logogram for the word ilum ('god') and on the other signify the god Anu or even the syllable -an- . Additionally, this sign
31520-424: The sea"). Tablet VI starts with Nergal, his titles, family and court (including Laṣ , Mammitum , Ishum and Ninmug ). The rest of the tablet is not arranged according to any discernible principles, and most likely originated as a compilation of material showing some connection to the underworld. Included are various figures explained as ilu lemnu ("evil god"), such as Kingaludda, the weaver goddess Uttu ,
31717-418: The second half of the third millennium BCE and examples simply have yet to be discovered. The arrangement of deities in the Weidner list does not appear to follow any specific principles, and it has been proposed that it was the result of compiling various shorter lists together. Copies are known from many locations in historical Babylonia and Assyria , as well as from Emar , Ugarit and Amarna . The list
31914-525: The section focused on Enki (Ea), accompanied by his wife Damkina . The order of the sections focused on him and Ninhursag is reversed compared to the An = Anum forerunner, which according to Ryan D. Winters might indicate the compilers of An = Anum followed the tradition making the latter the older sister of Enlil, and thus a deity of higher status. A sub-section is dedicated to Enki's Marduk . It includes his wife Zarpanit . Nabu appears in it as Marduk's sukkal alongside his wife Tashmetum , but he
32111-432: The sign MIN in a role analogous to the modern ditto mark . It can be used to refer to both pronunciation of different writings of a name and to theological identification between names. ŠU is used to mark entries as distinct from each other, for example when a list of servants of children of a deity begins after a list of titles explained as MIN. The entry of each deity is followed by their epithets and alternate names,
32308-496: The so-called Canonical Temple List , which documents temple names rather than god names, though the deities venerated in them are arranged according to similar theological principles. In some cases, the order of deities in An = Anum has been used to support proposed restoration of passages in the Canonical Temple List , for example Andrew R. George notes that the order in which temples of Enlil's courtiers are listed in
32505-505: The southern Caucasus and by communities in the Assyrian diaspora . Akkadian is a fusional language with grammatical case . Like all Semitic languages, Akkadian uses the system of consonantal roots . The Kültepe texts , which were written in Old Assyrian , include Hittite loanwords and names, which constitute the oldest record of any Indo-European language . Akkadian belongs with
32702-407: The superimposition of the Sumerian phonological system (for which an /o/ phoneme has also been proposed), rather than a separate phoneme in Akkadian. All consonants and vowels appear in long and short forms. Long consonants are transliterated as double consonants, and inconsistently written as such in cuneiform. Long vowels are transliterated with a macron (ā, ē, ī, ū) or a circumflex (â, ê, î, û),
32899-591: The texts contained several royal names, isolated signs could be identified, and were presented in 1802 by Georg Friedrich Grotefend . By this time it was already evident that Akkadian was a Semitic language, and the final breakthrough in deciphering the language came from Edward Hincks , Henry Rawlinson and Jules Oppert in the middle of the 19th century. In the early 21st century it was shown that automatic high-quality translation of Akkadian can be achieved using natural language processing methods such as convolutional neural networks . The following table summarises
33096-442: The texts placing him in this role are relatively late. It is first attested in the god list An = Anum , most likely composed in the Kassite period . Amurru (Martu) was universally regarded as a son of Anu. Dietz-Otto Edzard argued that the fact he was not regarded as a son of Enlil instead might stem from his secondary role in Mesopotamian religion. It is also possible that the comparisons between him and Ishkur contributed to
33293-462: The transcription contained many errors, and are considered too outdated to use. Fragments continued to be published in the first half of the twentieth century, but a transcription of the most complete copy, presently in the collection of the Yale University , has only been compiled by Richard L. Litke in 1958, and remained unpublished for a long time. In 1976 permission to use Litke's translation
33490-502: The variance in Ninshubur's gender is related to syncretism with him. The goddess Amasagnudi could be regarded as Anu's sukkal too, as attested in a single Old Babylonian lexical text. Kakka is also attested in this role in a few cases, though in the Enūma Eliš he is the sukkal of Anshar instead. In later periods, other sukkals of Anu were eclipsed by Papsukkal, originally associated with
33687-550: The war god Zababa (whose section also includes Nergal's sukkal Ugur , explicitly identified as such), Abu , and a number of names which seem to be grouped together only because they belong to gods originating in Lagash , among them Ningirsu . This god was usually syncretised with Ninurta and as such regarded as a son of Enlil, but in this case appears separately on a different tablet. Other deities of Lagash listed there include Bau , Gatumdug , as well as Igalim , Shulshaga and
33884-501: The weaver goddess Uttu (in a single source), the messenger god Papsukkal , Geshtinanna (in a hymn of Shulgi , which also mentions Urash as her mother), the fire god Gibil (and through association with him also Nuska ), Šiḫṭu, the divine representation of the planet Mercury (in Seleucid Uruk), and possibly the male Urash . Whether Anu was the father of Shara in the tradition of his cult center, Umma , cannot be determined with
34081-485: The wife of Anu. Julia Krul proposes that this was a traditional pairing in Early Dynastic Uruk, but according to Frans Wiggermann no other direct references to Nammu as Anu's wife are known. A possible exception is an Old Babylonian incantation which might refer to her as "pure one of An," but this attestation is uncertain. In older literature, an epithet of Ashratum was often translated as "bride of An," but this
34278-434: The word stem. As in all Semitic languages, some masculine nouns take the prototypically feminine plural ending ( -āt ). The nouns šarrum (king) and šarratum (queen) and the adjective dannum (strong) will serve to illustrate the case system of Akkadian. As is clear from the above table, the adjective and noun endings differ only in the masculine plural. Certain nouns, primarily those referring to geography, can also form
34475-476: Was Aramaic , which itself lacks case distinctions, it is possible that Akkadian's loss of cases was an areal as well as phonological phenomenon. As is also the case in other Semitic languages, Akkadian nouns may appear in a variety of "states" depending on their grammatical function in a sentence. The basic form of the noun is the status rectus (the governed state), which is the form as described above, complete with case endings. In addition to this, Akkadian has
34672-467: Was Enlil, rather than Anu, who was the head of the pantheon of this city, though later offering lists provide evidence on the contrary, possibly indicating a change occurred during the reign of either the Sargonic dynasty or Gudea . Xianhua Wang points out that in the Early Dynastic period , the rulers who mention Anu in the inscriptions and refer to him as lugal kur-kur , "king of the lands," seem to be connected with either Ur or Uruk , while elsewhere
34869-494: Was Urash instead also existed. In texts dedicated to Ishkur, he and Enki could be referred to as twins, but no analogous epithet can be found in compositions which focus on the latter god, according to Daniel Schwmer because due to his higher rank in the pantheon he would not benefit from being called the brother of a comparatively lower ranked deity. Enlil could be called a son of Anu, as already attested in an inscription of Lugalzagesi . Xianhua Wang proposes that this development
35066-456: Was a purely popular language — kings wrote in Babylonian — few long texts are preserved. It was, however, notably used in the correspondence of Assyrian traders in Anatolia in the 20th-18th centuries BC and that even led to its temporary adoption as a diplomatic language by various local Anatolian polities during that time. The Middle Babylonian period started in the 16th century BC. The division
35263-444: Was a temple of Anu and if it corresponded to any later structure. Through the Early Dynastic , Sargonic and Ur III periods, Inanna was the main deity of the city, and Eanna was regarded as her temple first and foremost. The Bassetki inscription of Naram-Sin in particular supports the view that Inanna was the goddess of Uruk and that she was perceived as more significant than Anu. No references to Anu are known from inscriptions of
35460-413: Was accompanied by a ziggurat, Emelamanna ("house of the radiance of heaven"). Daniel Schwemer suggests that the pairing of those two gods was based on the common view that they were father and son. No direct references to the worship of Anu are known from the part of the Old Babylonian period during which the cults of Uruk were temporarily relocated to Kish in the north of Babylonia. A possible exception
35657-426: Was also depicted in the form of a horned crown in Neo-Assyrian reliefs. According to Andrew R. George , references to the "seat" of a deity known from various topographical texts from both Babylonia and Assyria likely also refer to a representation in the form of an emblem placed on a pedestal. It has been pointed out that Anu's symbolic depictions were identical to Enlil's. A similar symbol could also represent Assur in
35854-422: Was granted to Dietz-Otto Edzard , who was the editor of Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie at the time. Many entries in subsequently compiled volumes of this encyclopedia rely on it. Litke's reconstruction was later published as a book in 1998 in the series Texts from Yale Babylonian Collection . While a second edition of An = Anum was being prepared by Wilfred G. Lambert for
36051-532: Was largely confined to scholars and priests working in temples in Assyria and Babylonia. The last known Akkadian cuneiform document dates from the 1st century AD. Mandaic spoken by Mandean Gnostics and the dialects spoken by the extant Assyrians ( Suret ) are three extant Neo-Aramaic languages that retain Akkadian vocabulary and grammatical features, as well as personal and family names. These are spoken by Assyrians and Mandeans mainly in northern Iraq , southeast Turkey , northeast Syria , northwest Iran ,
36248-448: Was later usurped by Inanna is known from multiple literary compositions, but it might have only been a founding myth explaining how the first temples were established. Starting in the Ur III period, Anu came to be seen as a member of a triad of foremost deities invoked in royal inscriptions, which also included Enlil and Enki . A seat, known as Barakiskilla ("dais, pure place") and a garden dedicated to him are mentioned in documents from
36445-413: Was less common and is no longer attested in any sources later than the Old Babylonian period . The only source to directly name his mother places Urash in this role. Another god frequently regarded as Anu's son was Enki . Nammu was the mother of Enki in the local tradition of Eridu and in the myth Enki and Ninmah , but a hymn from the reign of Ishme-Dagan confirms that a tradition in which his mother
36642-462: Was meant to reconcile a northern tradition, in which the king of the gods was Enlil, with a southern one, where the same role was played by Anu, though even in the south Lagash seemingly belonged to this proposed Enlil tradition. Another source which presents Enlil as Anu's son is the myth Enki and the World Order , which also specifies that he was the older brother of Enki. However, Enlil's parentage
36839-557: Was modeled on the position of Ahura Mazda in religion of the Achaemenids, but Paul-Alain Beaulieu points out that since first signs of it are already visible under Nabonidus , it is implausible that it was patterned on Persian religion . At the same time, he considers it possible that Achaemenid administration encouraged the worship of Anu, viewing it as a way to limit the influence of Babylon and its elites on inhabitants of other Mesopotamian cities. Similar connection has been proposed in
37036-483: Was not completely absent from Uruk at any point in time between the third and first millennium BCE, his position was that of a "figurehead" and "otiose deity", in contrast with An = Anum , where he is the foremost god. Beaulieu considers the position of Marduk to be the main difference between An = Anum and the Seleucid pantheon of Uruk, as the position of this god was much lower in the latter case, possibly due to theological conflict between Uruk and Babylon . Today it
37233-412: Was regarded as a form of Anu by local clergy. Beaulieu himself admits that most of the evidence which might support his theory might instead simply indicate that both the elevation of Assur and Anu relied on similar preexisting models, such as the theology centered on Enlil. Since during the Neo-Babylonian period Uruk was forced to accept the theology of Babylon, it is also possible that the elevation of Anu
37430-441: Was seen as a manifestation of local identity. At the same time, it is not impossible that the new centralized Anu cult was patterned on the Babylonian theology and even a number of festivals and rituals of Anu might have been patterned after those of Marduk. Instances of rewriting compositions dedicated to Marduk or Enlil to suit the new Anu cult are known too. A resource commonly employed by the theologians and antiquarians working on
37627-529: Was still in circulation in the late first millennium BCE. While the earliest god lists only had a single column, over the course of the second millennium BCE a two column format became the norm, possibly due to decrease in familiarity with Sumerian , which after the Ur III period survived only as a liturgical and scholarly language, necessitating the addition of explanations in Akkadian . For example, later copies of
37824-427: Was treated as the end of An = Anum . Kidin-Sin's copy does contain an appendix, but it consists of unrelated short lists according to the scribe himself included only to fill leftover space on the tablet. The arrangement of some of them follows esoteric and mystical principles, in contrast with An = Anum itself. An = Anum was itself most likely used as a model for other similar scholarly compositions, for example
38021-441: Was used as a determinative for divine names. Another peculiarity of Akkadian cuneiform is that many signs do not have a well defined phonetic value. Certain signs, such as AḪ , do not distinguish between the different vowel qualities. Nor is there any coordination in the other direction; the syllable -ša- , for example, is rendered by the sign ŠA , but also by the sign NĪĜ . Both of these are often used for
38218-505: Was used mostly in letters and administrative documents. During the first millennium BC, Akkadian progressively lost its status as a lingua franca . In the beginning, from around 1000 BC, Akkadian and Aramaic were of equal status, as can be seen in the number of copied texts: clay tablets were written in Akkadian, while scribes writing on papyrus and leather used Aramaic. From this period on, one speaks of Neo-Babylonian and Neo-Assyrian . Neo-Assyrian received an upswing in popularity in
38415-406: Was variable. The tradition in which his ancestors were the so-called Enki-Ninki deities is now considered conventional by Assyriologists, though materials pertaining to it are difficult to interpret. Enki, the ancestor of Enlil, is not to be confused with the god Enki, as indicated by the different spelling of their names in cuneiform . In yet another tradition, Enlil's father was Lugaldukuga , but
38612-475: Was viewed as an equivalent of Hadad, rather than Anu, further east. It is sometimes proposed that in the Hellenistic period Anu was identified with the Greek god Zeus , but most Assyriologists consider this possibility to be uncertain, one exception being Eleanor Robson . Julia Krul points out authors who propose it do not clarify whether they mean if "the Seleucids made such an equation themselves (...), or that
38809-505: Was written with the same combination of cuneiform signs. It is possible that in the late first millennium BCE attempts at syncretizing Ishtaran and Anu were made during a period of cooperation between the theologians from Uruk, Nippur and Der , but direct evidence is presently lacking. Further deities attested as children of Anu include the medicine goddesses Ninisina and Ninkarrak (also directly identified as daughters of his wife Urash), Bau (who could be called his firstborn daughter),
#114885