In sociolinguistics , a sociolect is a form of language ( non-standard dialect , restricted register ) or a set of lexical items used by a socioeconomic class, profession, age group, or other social group.
78-405: Sociolects involve both passive acquisition of particular communicative practices through association with a local community, as well as active learning and choice among speech or writing forms to demonstrate identification with particular groups. The term sociolect might refer to socially restricted dialects, but it is sometimes also treated as equivalent with the concept of register , or used as
156-462: A certain speech community. An example of a dialectal difference, based on region, is the use of the words soda or pop and coke in different parts of the United States. As Thomas E. Murray states, " coke is used generically by thousands of people, especially in the southern half of the country." On the other hand, pop is known to be a term that is used by many citizens in the northern half of
234-406: A computer determines when two objects are different or not, is one of the most important tasks of computational pragmatics. There has been a great amount of discussion on the boundary between semantics and pragmatics and there are many different formalizations of aspects of pragmatics linked to context dependence. Particularly interesting cases are the discussions on the semantics of indexicals and
312-550: A development of the Fregean idea of assertion sign as formal sign of the act of assertion. Over the past decade, many probabilistic and Bayesian methods have become very popular in the modelling of pragmatics, of which the most successful framework has been the Rational Speech Act framework developed by Noah Goodman and Michael C. Frank , which has already seen much use in the analysis of metaphor, hyperbole and politeness. In
390-532: A hysterical fashion...with the same states [of illness] that they have had. The identification which occurs here is, as we can see, nothing other than a mode of thinking". The question was taken up again psychoanalytically in Ferenczi's article "Introjection and Transference" (1909), but it was in the decade between " On Narcissism " (1914) and " The Ego and the Id " (1923) that Freud made his most detailed and intensive study of
468-450: A language exist side by side". The Classical Arabic is known as الفصحى, or al-fuṣḥā , while the colloquial dialect depends on the country. For example, شامي, or šāmi , is spoken in Lebanon and parts of Syria. In many situations, there is a major lexical difference among words in the classical and colloquial speech, as well as pronunciation differences, such as a difference in short vowels, when
546-440: A possible referent, (ii) salience of the referent in the context of discussion (iii) an effort for unity of the parties involved, and finally, (iv) a blatant presence of distance from the last referent. Referential expressions are a form of anaphora. They are also a means of connecting past and present thoughts together to create context for information at hand. Analyzing the context of a sentence and determining whether or not
624-934: A reference game such that: L 1 : P L 1 ( s | u ) ∝ P S 1 ( u | s ) ⋅ P ( s ) S 1 : P S 1 ( u | s ) ∝ exp ( α U S 1 ( u ; s ) ) L 0 : P L O ( s | u ) ∝ [ [ u ] ] ( s ) ⋅ P ( s ) {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}&L_{1}:P_{L_{1}}(s|u)\propto P_{S_{1}}(u|s)\cdot P(s)\\&S_{1}:P_{S_{1}}(u|s)\propto \exp(\alpha U_{S_{1}}(u;s))\\&L_{0}:P_{L_{O}}(s|u)\propto [\![u]\!](s)\cdot P(s)\end{aligned}}} Pragmatics (more specifically, Speech Act Theory's notion of
702-415: A similar systematic ambiguity with the word "definable". The referential uses of language are how signs are used to refer to certain items. A sign is the link or relationship between a signified and the signifier as defined by de Saussure and Jean-René Huguenin . The signified is some entity or concept in the world. The signifier represents the signified. An example would be: The relationship between
780-406: A single noun or pronoun, but never between the possessor and the possessed." "This is hers, This is mines, This is John's, but not in her book, my book, John book" "Interview with Bryan A., seven years old, a struggling reader in a West Philadelphia elementary school: Many times within communities that contain sociolects that separate groups linguistically it is necessary to have a process where
858-496: A sociolect began with the commencement of dialectology , the study of different dialects in relation to society, which has been established in countries such as England for many years, but only recently has the field garnered more attention. However, as opposed to a dialect, the basic concept of a sociolect is that a person speaks in accordance with their social group whether it is with regard to one's ethnicity, age, gender, etc. As William Labov once said, "the sociolinguistic view ...
SECTION 10
#1732883793753936-411: A synonym for jargon and slang . Sociolinguists —people who study sociolects and language variation —define a sociolect by examining the social distribution of specific linguistic terms. For example, a sociolinguist would examine the use of the second person pronoun you within a given population. If one distinct social group used yous as the plural form of the pronoun, then this could indicate
1014-401: A very young age. In "Mourning and Melancholia" Freud, having "shown that identification is a preliminary stage of object-choice", argued that the experience of loss sets in motion a regressive process that "served to establish an identification of the ego with the abandoned object". In "The Ego and the Id", he went on to maintain that "this kind of substitution has a great share in determining
1092-493: Is "different language, dialects, or styles are used in different social contexts". Language attitudes are "social in origin, but that they may have important effects on language behavior, being involved in acts of identity, and on linguistic change." Linguistic variable is "a linguistic unit...initially developed...in order to be able to handle linguistics variation. Variables may be lexical and grammatical, but are most often phonological". Example of British English (h) which
1170-584: Is a psychological process whereby the individual assimilates an aspect, property, or attribute of the other and is transformed wholly or partially by the model that other provides. It is by means of a series of identifications that the personality is constituted and specified. The roots of the concept can be found in Freud 's writings. The three most prominent concepts of identification as described by Freud are: primary identification, narcissistic (secondary) identification and partial (secondary) identification. While "in
1248-401: Is based on the perception of a special quality of another person. This quality or ideal is often represented in a "leader figure" who is identified with. For example: the young boy identifies with the strong muscles of an older neighbour boy. Next to identification with the leader, people identify with others because they feel they have something in common. For example: a group of people who like
1326-605: Is called pragmatic competence . In 1938, Charles Morris first distinguished pragmatics as an independent subfield within semiotics, alongside syntax and semantics. Pragmatics emerged as its own subfield in the 1950s after the pioneering work of J.L. Austin and Paul Grice . Pragmatics was a reaction to structuralist linguistics as outlined by Ferdinand de Saussure . In many cases, it expanded upon his idea that language has an analyzable structure, composed of parts that can be defined in relation to others. Pragmatics first engaged only in synchronic study, as opposed to examining
1404-536: Is considerable overlap between pragmatics and sociolinguistics , since both share an interest in linguistic meaning as determined by usage in a speech community. However, sociolinguists tend to be more interested in variations in language within such communities. Influences of philosophy and politics are also present in the field of pragmatics, as the dynamics of societies and oppression are expressed through language Pragmatics helps anthropologists relate elements of language to broader social phenomena; it thus pervades
1482-402: Is eating a cookie right now", describes events that are happening at the time the proposition is uttered. Semantic-referential meaning is also present in meta-semantical statements such as: If someone were to say that a tiger is a carnivorous animal in one context and a mammal in another, the definition of tiger would still be the same. The meaning of the sign tiger is describing some animal in
1560-405: Is geography: a certain region uses specific phonological, morphosyntactic or lexical rules. Asif Agha expands the concept by stating that "the case where the demographic dimension marked by speech are matters of geographic provenance alone, such as speaker's birth locale, extended residence and the like". However, a sociolect's main identifier is a socioeconomic class, age, gender, and/or ethnicity in
1638-438: Is heavily focused upon definite descriptions and referent accessibility. Theories have been presented for why direct referent descriptions occur in discourse. (In layman's terms: why reiteration of certain names, places, or individuals involved or as a topic of the conversation at hand are repeated more than one would think necessary.) Four factors are widely accepted for the use of referent language including (i) competition with
SECTION 20
#17328837937531716-469: Is sometimes present and sometimes not. Pragmatics is the meaning of a word in social context, while semantics has "purely linguistic meaning". Register is "a language variety that is associated with a particular topic, subject, or activity...." Usually, it is defined by vocabulary, but has grammatical features as well. The following is an example of the lexical distinction between the Mudaliyar and
1794-423: Is that we are programmed to learn to speak in ways that fit the general pattern of our communities." Therefore, what we are surrounded with in our environment determines how we speak; hence, our actions and associations. The main distinction between sociolects (social dialects) and dialects proper (geographical dialects), which are often confused, is the settings in which they are created. A dialect's main identifier
1872-510: Is used by one word in the non-Brahmin caste and three separate words in the Brahmin caste. Furthermore, Agha references how the use of different speech reflects a "departure from a group-internal norm". For example, if the non-Brahmin caste uses Brahmin terms in their mode of speech it is seen as self-raising, whereas if people within the Brahmin caste use non-Brahmin speech it is seen as pejoratives. Therefore, depending on which castes use certain words
1950-671: The Iyengar groups of the Tamil-speaking people in India . The Iyengar group is part of the Brahmin caste which is scholarly and higher in the caste hierarchy than the non-Brahmin or Mudaliyar, caste. The Mudaliyars use many of the same words for things that are differentiated within the Iyengars' speech. For example, as seen below, the difference between drinking water, water in general, and non-potable water
2028-439: The performative ) underpins Judith Butler 's theory of gender performativity . In Gender Trouble , they claim that gender and sex are not natural categories, but socially constructed roles produced by "reiterative acting." In Excitable Speech they extend their theory of performativity to hate speech and censorship , arguing that censorship necessarily strengthens any discourse it tries to suppress and therefore, since
2106-517: The International Pragmatics Association (IPrA). Pragmatics encompasses phenomena including implicature , speech acts , relevance and conversation , as well as nonverbal communication . Theories of pragmatics go hand-in-hand with theories of semantics , which studies aspects of meaning, and syntax which examines sentence structures, principles, and relationships. The ability to understand another speaker's intended meaning
2184-468: The Rational Speech Act, listeners and speakers both reason about the other's reasoning concerning the literal meaning of the utterances, and as such, the resulting interpretation depends, but is not necessarily determined by the literal truth conditional meaning of an utterance, and so it uses recursive reasoning to pursue a broadly Gricean co-operative ideal. In the most basic form of the Rational Speech Act, there are three levels of inference; Beginning from
2262-446: The analyst as a central curative factor". How far the same criticism applies, however, to those who see as a positive therapeutic result "the development of a self-analytic attitude...[built on] identification with and internalization of the analyst's analytic attitude" is not perhaps quite clear. Marion Milner has argued that "terminal identification" can be most acute in those analysands who go on to become therapists themselves: "by
2340-431: The behavior of their parents. Freud remarked that identification should be distinguished from imitation , which is a voluntary and conscious act. Because of this process of emotional attachment a child will develop a super ego that has similarities to the moral values and guidelines by which the parents live their lives. By this process children become a great deal like their parents and this facilitates learning to live in
2418-443: The concept of the 'psychic skin' ". Pragmatics In linguistics and related fields, pragmatics is the study of how context contributes to meaning. The field of study evaluates how human language is utilized in social interactions, as well as the relationship between the interpreter and the interpreted. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are called pragmaticians . The field has been represented since 1986 by
Sociolect - Misplaced Pages Continue
2496-589: The concept. Freud distinguished three main kinds of identification. "First, identification is the original form of emotional tie with an object; secondly, in a regressive way it becomes a substitute for a libidinal object-tie...and thirdly, it may arise with any new perception of a common quality which is shared with some other person". Primary identification is the original and primitive form of emotional attachment to something or someone prior to any relations with other persons or objects: "an individual's first and most important identification, his identification with
2574-514: The country. An example of a sociolect difference, based on social grouping, is the zero copula in African American Vernacular English . It occurs in a specific ethnic group but in all areas of the United States. William Labov gives an example: "he here" instead of "he's here." Code switching is "the process whereby bilingual or bidialectal speakers switch back and forth between one language or dialect and another within
2652-428: The existence of a sociolect. A sociolect is distinct from a regional dialect (regiolect) because social class , rather than geographical subdivision, substantiates the unique linguistic features. A sociolect, defined by leading sociolinguist and philosopher Peter Trudgill, is "a variety or lect which is thought of as being related to its speakers' social background rather than geographical background." This idea of
2730-482: The father in his own personal prehistory...with the parents". This means that when a baby is born he is not capable of making a distinction between himself and important others. The baby has an emotional attachment with his parents and experiences his parents as a part of himself. "The breast is part of me, I am the breast." During this process of identification children adopt unconsciously the characteristics of their parents and begin to associate themselves with and copy
2808-430: The field of linguistic anthropology . Because pragmatics describes generally the forces in play for a given utterance, it includes the study of power, gender, race, identity, and their interactions with individual speech acts. For example, the study of code switching directly relates to pragmatics, since a switch in code effects a shift in pragmatic force. According to Charles W. Morris , pragmatics tries to understand
2886-463: The form taken by the ego and that it makes an essential contribution towards building up what is called its 'character'". Jacques Lacan , in his theory of the Imaginary , developed the latter point, describing the ego as being "constituted in its nucleus by a series of alienating identifications" – part of his opposition to any concept of an "autonomous" and conflict-free ego. Partial identification
2964-644: The highest level, the pragmatic listener L 1 {\displaystyle L_{1}} will reason about the pragmatic speaker S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} , and will then infer the likely world state s {\displaystyle s} taking into account that S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} has deliberately chosen to produce utterance u {\displaystyle u} , while S 1 {\displaystyle S_{1}} chooses to produce utterance u {\displaystyle u} by reasoning about how
3042-521: The historical development of language. However, it rejected the notion that all meaning comes from signs existing purely in the abstract space of langue . Meanwhile, historical pragmatics has also come into being. The field did not gain linguists' attention until the 1970s, when two different schools emerged: the Anglo-American pragmatic thought and the European continental pragmatic thought (also called
3120-407: The idea of the performative , a type of utterance that performs the very action it describes. Speech Act Theory's examination of Illocutionary Acts has many of the same goals as pragmatics, as outlined above . Computational Pragmatics, as defined by Victoria Fromkin , concerns how humans can communicate their intentions to computers with as little ambiguity as possible. That process, integral to
3198-426: The independent speech communities can communicate in the same register; even if the change is as simple as different pronunciation. Therefore, the act of code-switching becomes essential. Code-switching is defined as "the process whereby bilingual or bidialectal speakers switch back and forth between one language or dialect and another within the same conversation". At times code-switching can be situational, depending on
Sociolect - Misplaced Pages Continue
3276-429: The indexical aspect would be the person who is speaking (refer above for definitions of semantic-referential and indexical meaning). Another example would be: A pure indexical sign does not contribute to the meaning of the propositions at all. It is an example of a "non-referential use of language." A second way to define the signified and signifier relationship is C.S. Peirce 's Peircean Trichotomy . The components of
3354-481: The latter is independent of the context (semantico-referential meaning), meaning the concept chair. Referring to things and people is a common feature of conversation, and conversants do so collaboratively . Individuals engaging in discourse utilize pragmatics. In addition, individuals within the scope of discourse cannot help but avoid intuitive use of certain utterances or word choices in an effort to create communicative success. The study of referential language
3432-465: The literal listener L 0 {\displaystyle L_{0}} will understand the literal meaning of u {\displaystyle u} and so will attempt to maximise the chances that L 0 {\displaystyle L_{0}} will correctly infer the world state s {\displaystyle s} . As such, a simple schema of the Rational Speech Act reasoning hierarchy can be formulated for use in
3510-475: The mat", the act is itself an utterance. That implies that a sentence, term, expression or word cannot symbolically represent a single true meaning; such meaning is underspecified (which cat sat on which mat?) and potentially ambiguous. By contrast, the meaning of an utterance can be inferred through knowledge of both its linguistic and non-linguistic contexts (which may or may not be sufficient to resolve ambiguity). In mathematics, with Berry's paradox , there arises
3588-709: The mere fact of becoming analysts we have succeeded in bypassing an experience which our patients have to go through. We have chosen to identify with our analyst's profession and to act out that identification". Much has been written on identification since Freud. Identification has been seen both as a normal developmental mechanism and as a mechanism of defence . Many types of identification have been described by other psychoanalysts, including counter-identification (Fliess, 1953), pseudoidentification (Eidelberg, 1938), concordant and complementary identifications (Racker, 1957), and adhesive identification (Bick, 1968): "the work of Bick and others on adhesive identification, exploring
3666-488: The more easily others can surmise their meaning; the further they stray from common expressions and topics, the wider the variations in interpretations. That suggests that sentences do not have intrinsic meaning, that there is no meaning associated with a sentence or word, and that either can represent an idea only symbolically. The cat sat on the mat is a sentence in English. If someone were to say to someone else, "The cat sat on
3744-433: The patient identifies is their strong ego...[or] identification with the analyst's superego". Lacan took strong exception to "any analysis that one teaches as having to be terminated by identification with the analyst...There is a beyond to this identification...this crossing of the plane of identification". Most Lacanians have subsequently echoed his distrust of "the view of psychoanalysis that relies on identification with
3822-421: The perspective view). Ambiguity refers to when it is difficult to infer meaning without knowing the context, the identity of the speaker or the speaker's intent. For example, the sentence "You have a green light" is ambiguous, as without knowing the context, one could reasonably interpret it as meaning: Another example of an ambiguous sentence is, "I went to the bank." This is an example of lexical ambiguity, as
3900-468: The phonological difference (e.g., R makes more consonantal and vocalic distinctions than B), while others are due to the morphological difference (e.g., difference in plural suffixes and certain verb inflections) between two varieties. The chart below gives an example of diglossia in Arabic-speaking nations and where it is used. Diglossia is defined by Mesthrie as "[a] situation where two varieties of
3978-443: The pragmatics change. Hence, this speech system is determined by socioeconomic class and social context. Norwegian does not have a spoken standard and is heavily dependent on dialect variants. The following example shows the difference between the national written standard and a spoken variant, where the phonology and pronunciation differ. These are not sociolectic differences per se. As Agha states, "Some lexical contrasts are due to
SECTION 50
#17328837937534056-437: The problem of referential descriptions, a topic developed after the theories of Keith Donnellan . A proper logical theory of formal pragmatics has been developed by Carlo Dalla Pozza , according to which it is possible to connect classical semantics (treating propositional contents as true or false) and intuitionistic semantics (dealing with illocutionary forces). The presentation of a formal treatment of pragmatics appears to be
4134-406: The proposition is describing that Santa Claus eats cookies. The meaning of the proposition does not rely on whether or not Santa Claus is eating cookies at the time of its utterance. Santa Claus could be eating cookies at any time and the meaning of the proposition would remain the same. The meaning is simply describing something that is the case in the world. In contrast, the proposition, "Santa Claus
4212-425: The psychoanalytic literature there is agreement that the core meaning of identification is simple – to be like or to become like another", it has also been adjudged " 'the most perplexing clinical/theoretical area' in psychoanalysis". Freud first raised the matter of identification ( German : Identifizierung ) in 1897, in connection with the illness or death of one's parents, and the response "to punish oneself in
4290-423: The relationship between signs and their users, while semantics tends to focus on the actual objects or ideas to which a word refers, and syntax (or "syntactics") examines relationships among signs or symbols. Semantics is the literal meaning of an idea whereas pragmatics is the implied meaning of the given idea. Speech Act Theory , pioneered by J.L. Austin and further developed by John Searle , centers around
4368-464: The relationship between the signified and the signifier. One way to define the relationship is by placing signs in two categories: referential indexical signs, also called "shifters", and pure indexical signs. Referential indexical signs are signs where the meaning shifts depending on the context hence the nickname "shifters." 'I' would be considered a referential indexical sign. The referential aspect of its meaning would be '1st person singular' while
4446-404: The role of victim whilst the patient acts out an identification with the aggressor" in the analytic situation. Mainstream analytic thought broadly agrees that interpretation took effect "by utilizing positive transference and transitory identifications with the analyst". More controversial, however, was the concept of "the terminal identification" at the close of analysis, where "that with which
4524-641: The same conversation". Diglossia , associated with the American linguist Charles A. Ferguson , which describes a sociolinguistic situation such as those that obtain in Arabic-speaking countries and in German-speaking Switzerland. In such a diglossic community, the prestigious standard of 'High' (or H) variety, which is linguistically related to but significantly different from the vernacular or 'Low' (or L) varieties, has no native speakers. Domain
4602-415: The same music. This mechanism plays an important role in the formation of groups. It contributes to the development of character and the ego is formed by identification with a group (group norms). Partial identification promotes the social life of persons who will be able to identify with one another through this common bond to one another, instead of considering someone as a rival. Freud went on to indicate
4680-418: The science of natural language processing (seen as a sub-discipline of artificial intelligence ), involves providing a computer system with some database of knowledge related to a topic and a series of algorithms, which control how the system responds to incoming data, using contextual knowledge to more accurately approximate natural human language and information processing abilities. Reference resolution, how
4758-612: The semantico-referential meaning of the utterances is unchanged from that of the other possible (but often impermissible) forms, but the pragmatic meaning is vastly different. J.L. Austin introduced the concept of the performative , contrasted in his writing with "constative" (i.e. descriptive) utterances. According to Austin's original formulation, a performative is a type of utterance characterized by two distinctive features: Examples: To be performative, an utterance must conform to various conditions involving what Austin calls felicity . These deal with things like appropriate context and
SECTION 60
#17328837937534836-412: The situation or topical, depending on the topic. Halliday terms this the best when he defines the role of discourse, stating that "it is this that determines, or rather correlates with, the role played by the language activity in the situation". Therefore, meaning that which register is used depends on the situation and lays out the social context of the situation, because if the wrong register is used, then
4914-412: The speaker's authority. For instance, when a couple has been arguing and the husband says to his wife that he accepts her apology even though she has offered nothing approaching an apology, his assertion is infelicitous: because she has made neither expression of regret nor request for forgiveness, there exists none to accept, and thus no act of accepting can possibly happen. Roman Jakobson , expanding on
4992-480: The state has sole power to define hate speech legally, it is the state that makes hate speech performative. Jacques Derrida remarked that some work done under Pragmatics aligned well with the program he outlined in his book Of Grammatology . Émile Benveniste argued that the pronouns "I" and "you" are fundamentally distinct from other pronouns because of their role in creating the subject . Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari discuss linguistic pragmatics in
5070-421: The trichotomy are the following: These relationships allow signs to be used to convey intended meaning. If two people were in a room and one of them wanted to refer to a characteristic of a chair in the room he would say "this chair has four legs" instead of "a chair has four legs." The former relies on context (indexical and referential meaning) by referring to a chair specifically in the room at that moment while
5148-461: The two gives the sign meaning. The relationship can be explained further by considering what is meant by "meaning." In pragmatics, there are two different types of meaning to consider: semantic-referential meaning and indexical meaning. Semantic-referential meaning refers to the aspect of meaning, which describes events in the world that are independent of the circumstance they are uttered in. An example would be propositions such as: In this case,
5226-520: The use of "trial identification with the patient in the session" as part of the growing technique of analysing from the countertransference . In her classic book The Ego and the Mechanism of Defence , Anna Freud introduced "two original defence mechanisms...both of which have become classics of ego psychology ", the one being altruistic surrender, the other identification with the aggressor. Anna Freud pointed out that identification with parental values
5304-597: The use of referent expression is necessary is highly reliant upon the author/speaker's digression- and is correlated strongly with the use of pragmatic competency. Michael Silverstein has argued that "nonreferential" or "pure" indices do not contribute to an utterance's referential meaning but instead "signal some particular value of one or more contextual variables." Although nonreferential indexes are devoid of semantico-referential meaning, they do encode "pragmatic" meaning. The sorts of contexts that such indexes can mark are varied. Examples include: In all of these cases,
5382-551: The verbal -s not just on third-person singular verbs in the present tense such as in Standard American English , but added onto infinitives, first-person present verbs, and third-person past perfect verbs. Further examples of the phenomenon in AAVE are provided below. Below are examples of the lack of the possessive ending; -s is usually absent in AAVE but contains a rule As Labov states, "[the] use -s to indicate possession by
5460-492: The way "a path leads from identification by way of imitation to empathy , that is, to the comprehension of the mechanism by which we are enabled to take up any attitude at all towards another mental life". Otto Fenichel would go on to emphasize how "trial identifications for the purposes of empathy play a basic part in normal object relationships. They can be studied especially in analyzing the psychoanalyst's ways of working". Object relations theory would subsequently highlight
5538-402: The word bank can either be in reference to a place where money is kept, or the edge of a river. To understand what the speaker is truly saying, it is a matter of context, which is why it is pragmatically ambiguous as well. Similarly, the sentence "Sherlock saw the man with binoculars" could mean that Sherlock observed the man by using binoculars, or it could mean that Sherlock observed a man who
5616-399: The words are the same. Although a specific example of diglossia was not given, its social context is almost if not more important. For example, Halliday states that "in areas with Diglossia, the link between language and success is apparent as the higher, classical register is learned through formal education". Below is an example of African American Vernacular English, showing the addition of
5694-521: The work of Karl Bühler , described six "constitutive factors" of a speech event , each of which represents the privileging of a corresponding function, and only one of which is the referential (which corresponds to the context of the speech event). The six constitutive factors and their corresponding functions are diagrammed below. The six constitutive factors of a speech event Addresser --------------------- Addressee The six functions of language Emotive ----------------------- Conative There
5772-427: The world and culture to which they are born. "By and large, psychoanalysts grant the importance and centrality of primary identification, even though...the concept varies 'according to each author and his ideas, its meaning in consequence being far from precise' ( Etchegoyen 1985)". Narcissistic identification is the form of identification following abandonment or loss of an object. This experience of loss starts at
5850-402: The world, which does not change in either circumstance. Indexical meaning, on the other hand, is dependent on the context of the utterance and has rules of use. By rules of use, it is meant that indexicals can tell when they are used, but not what they actually mean. Whom "I" refers to, depends on the context and the person uttering it. As mentioned, these meanings are brought about through
5928-604: The wrong context is placed on the words. Furthermore, referring back to the diglossia expressed in the Arab-speaking world and the Tamil caste system in India, which words are used must be appropriate to not only the social class of the speaker, but the situation, the topic, and the need for courtesy. A more comprehensive definition is stated, "Code-switching is not only a definition of the situation but an expression of social hierarchy." Identification (psychology) Identification
6006-399: Was a normal part of the development of the superego ; but that "if the child introjects both rebuke and punishment and then regularly projects this same punishment on another, 'then he is arrested at an intermediate stage in the development of the superego ' ". The concept was also taken up in object relations theory, which particularly explored "how a patient sometimes places the analyst in
6084-453: Was holding binoculars ( syntactic ambiguity ). The meaning of the sentence depends on an understanding of the context and the speaker's intent. As defined in linguistics, a sentence is an abstract entity: a string of words divorced from non-linguistic context, as opposed to an utterance , which is a concrete example of a speech act in a specific context. The more closely conscious subjects stick to common words, idioms, phrasings, and topics,
#752247