83-562: Withypool Stone Circle , also known as Withypool Hill Stone Circle , is a stone circle located on the Exmoor moorland , near the village of Withypool in the southwestern English county of Somerset . The ring is part of a tradition of stone circle construction that spread throughout much of Britain, Ireland, and Brittany during the Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age , over a period between 3300 and 900 BCE . The purpose of such monuments
166-933: A catalogue published in a 1988 edition of the Proceedings . The site has been designatedas a scheduled monument since 1925, and is thus accorded legal protection under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979 . Stone circles in the British Isles and Brittany The stone circles in the British Isles and Brittany are a megalithic tradition of monuments consisting of standing stones arranged in rings. These were constructed from 3200 to 2000 BCE in Great Britain , Ireland and Brittany . It has been estimated that around 4,000 of these monuments were originally constructed in this part of north-western Europe during this period. Around 1,300 of them are recorded,
249-406: A diameter of 331.6 metres (1,088 ft), making it Britain's largest stone circle. All of the largest circles were found in or near earlier henge monuments. Such gargantuan monuments were rare. Burl calculated that most of the megalithic rings (92%) had an average diameter of 13.7 metres (45 ft), with an average area of 150 m (1615 ft²). The archaeologist Alexander Thom proposed that
332-829: A few miles distant from one another; of these, the Day House Lane Stone Circle is the only example to survive. The stones of the Fir Clump Stone Circle , already flattened in the 1860s, were for instance removed during construction of the M4 motorway in 1969. The area of modern Dorset has a "thin scatter" of stone circles, with nine possible examples known within its boundaries: Hampton Down Stone Circle , Kingston Russell Stone Circle , Nine Stones , and Rempstone Stone Circle remain visible. The archaeologist John Gale described these as "a small but significant group" of such monuments. All are located within five miles of
415-420: A heavily ruined state and in some cases have been destroyed. As noted by the archaeologist Aubrey Burl , these examples have left behind "only frustrating descriptions and vague positions". Most of the known Wiltshire examples were erected on low-lying positions in the landscape. In northern Wiltshire, in the area to the south of Swindon , at least seven stone circles are reported as having existed, often only
498-477: A henge, near Parracombe , although it has been damaged by ploughing. Alongside this, the moor bears a profusion of other Bronze Age monuments, including between 300 and 400 round barrows, standing stones , linear stone rows , and stone settings. The creation of these different monument types might also explain why so few stone circles were apparently created here. Most of the surviving prehistoric stone monuments on Exmoor are located on those areas of moorland outside
581-537: A key role in the discovery of a new henge site along the River Avon that links to Stonehenge . This new site was uncovered through excavation during the Stonehenge Riverside Project and was given the name " BlueStoneHenge " or "BlueHenge" because traces of bluestones were found during the excavation . During 2017 and 2018, excavations by his UCL team led to a proposal that the site at Waun Mawn , in
664-473: A minority of cases, some were also used as cemeteries, with burials being made in and around the circle. Antiquarian investigation into the circles began in the Early Modern period, intensifying after the publications of notable English antiquarian William Stukeley in the 18th century. At the time, scholars understood little of prehistoric Britain, with the megalithic circles typically being ascribed either to
747-714: A pioneering part of the post-processualist current within archaeological theory . Parker Pearson became interested in Marxism . In the 1984 anthology Ideology, Power and Prehistory , edited by Daniel Miller and Christopher Tilley, Parker Pearson published a paper in which he examined the pre-state societies of Jutland from a Marxist perspective. At the start of this paper, he noted that it had repercussions for Marxism in that its findings discerned "a certain blurring between capitalism and non-capitalism". From 1984 through to 1990, Parker Pearson worked as an Inspector of Monuments for English Heritage , and in 1989 he received membership to
830-1017: A shape can also be "profoundly egalitarian". This transition was, according to historian Ronald Hutton, "as fundamental as that from the Mesolithic had been." Archaeological pollen analysis has shown that it was a period when scrub and weeds were spreading over what had formerly been cultivated fields, and forests that had previously been cleared began to grow back. Chambered tombs were blocked up and abandoned, implying that people were ceasing to use them as cultic sites. Several former causewayed enclosures were converted into defensive structures with gateways and walls, and in some cases they were attacked. Evidence for conflict has been found at Carn Brea in Cornwall, Hambledon Hill in Dorset, and Crickley Hill in Gloucestershire. Various archaeologists have suggested that this
913-510: A thesis titled "Death, society and social change: the Iron Age of southern Jutland 200 BC – 600 AD" in which he discussed what was known about the bog bodies of Iron Age Denmark; it would remain unpublished. Supervised by Ian Hodder as a post-graduate at Cambridge, Parker Pearson was a contemporary of Sheena Crawford, Daniel Miller , Henrietta Moore , Christopher Tilley and Alice Welbourn; these students were influenced by Hodder's ideas, then
SECTION 10
#1733084837650996-523: A view endorsed by Burl, who noted that their distribution did not match that of any known Neolithic sites. It is possible that they were not all constructed around the same date. The Piggotts suggested that while they may well be Early Bronze Age in date, it is also possible that "their use and possibly their construction may last into the Middle and even into the Late Bronze Age". Their nearest analogies are
1079-416: Is peaty with heather . A range of different Bronze Age round barrows , a type of tumulus , are visible at different points in the surrounding landscape. There is a lone tumulus 262 metres (287 yards) to the north-east of the circle, on the summit of Withypool Hill, although this is so eroded that it can no longer be seen from Withypool Stone Circle itself. The three Brightworthy Barrows can be seen from
1162-529: Is a collection of six stones arranged in a rough circle, which may have represented another stone circle or perhaps the kerbstones from a since-destroyed round cairn . While the transition from the Early Neolithic to the Late Neolithic in the fourth and third millennia BCE saw much economic and technological continuity, there was a considerable change in the style of monuments erected, particularly in what
1245-704: Is an English archaeologist specialising in the study of the Neolithic British Isles , Madagascar and the archaeology of death and burial . A professor at the UCL Institute of Archaeology , he previously worked for 25 years as a professor at the University of Sheffield in England, and was the director of the Stonehenge Riverside Project . A prolific author, he has also written a variety of books on
1328-431: Is much diversity in the design of these circles, both between different regions and within them. According to Mike Parker Pearson, this is "perhaps unsurprising for a thousand-year fashion". The archaeologist and stone circle specialist Aubrey Burl noted that the stone circle builders would have had to undertake "careful planning" before they erected these monuments. There was much that they had to take into consideration:
1411-463: Is now southern and eastern England. By 3000 BCE, the long barrows , causewayed enclosures , and cursuses which had predominated in the Early Neolithic were no longer built, and had been replaced by circular monuments of various kinds. These include earthen henges , timber circles , and stone circles. Stone circles are found in most areas of Britain where stone is available, with the exception of
1494-474: Is possible that both wooden and stone features of the circle were contemporary with each other. Like henges, the stone circles are almost exclusively found in the British Isles. The distribution of the stone circles is distinctive as it is broader than that of the henges. They are found in most areas of Britain where stone is available, except the island's south-eastern corner. They are most densely concentrated in south-western Britain and near Aberdeen . There
1577-666: Is unknown, although archaeologists speculate that the stones represented supernatural entities for the circle's builders. Many monuments were built in Exmoor during the Bronze Age, but only two stone circles survive in this area: the other is Porlock Stone Circle . The Withypool ring is located on the south-western slope of Withypool Hill, on an area of heathland . It is about 36.4 metres (119 feet 5 inches) in diameter. Around thirty small gritstones remain, although there may originally have been around 100; there are conspicuous gaps on
1660-506: The Goddess movement , and they used the sites as places to conduct their magico-religious rites. During the Neolithic, or 'New Stone Age', there were extensive cultural changes across north-western Europe. The introduction of agriculture ended the hunter-gatherer lifestyle which had dominated in the preceding Palaeolithic ('Old Stone Age') and Mesolithic ('Middle Stone Age') periods. During
1743-561: The Institute for Archaeologists . In 1990, he secured an academic teaching position at the Department of Archaeology at the University of Sheffield , where he would work for the next 21 years. In 1991 he was admitted as a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London , and in 1996 then became a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland . From 2003 through to 2009, Parker Pearson directed
SECTION 20
#17330848376501826-754: The Lake District , the south-west peninsula of England, and the north and south-west of Ireland. Sparser groupings can also be found in Caithness , the Outer Hebrides , the Peak District , the Wicklow Mountains , Wales and Wessex . Their original purpose is not fully known, but archaeological investigation has shed some light on it. It is widely thought that they served a ritual or ceremonial purpose, particularly in relation to solar and/or lunar alignments. In
1909-535: The Late Middle Ages , references to prehistoric monuments in the British Isles were rare, and were usually only to note down practical matters, such as that a judicial court would be held near to one or that a farmer's land lay near to one. A rare exception is found in the fictionalised History of the Kings of Britain (c.1136), in which the chronicle's author Geoffrey of Monmouth claimed that Stonehenge had once been
1992-536: The Preseli Hills of Pembrokeshire , had originally housed a 110 m (360 ft) diameter stone circle of the same size as the ditch at Stonehenge The archaeologists also postulated that the circle also contained a hole from one stone which had a distinctive pentagonal shape, very closely matching the one pentagonal stone at Stonehenge (stone hole 91 at Waun Mawn and stone 62 at Stonehenge). Both circles appear, according to some researchers, to be oriented towards
2075-755: The Stonehenge Riverside Project . The project garnered three major archaeological awards: the Andante Travel Archaeology Award (2008), the Royal Society of Northern Antiquaries Award (2009), and the UK Archaeological Research Project of the Year (2010). His work in leading the project also led to Parker Pearson being personally awarded the UK Archaeologist of the Year award in 2010. Parker Pearson and his team of researchers played
2158-431: The chambered long barrows of the Early Neolithic, stone circles are one of the most prominent forms of monument produced in prehistoric Britain. Despite the commonly used term "stone circles", many of these monuments are not true circles, but are instead ellipses or ovals. The stone circles are not always found in isolation from other forms of monument and often intersect with timber and earth structures. For this reason,
2241-417: The clapper bridge at Tarr Steps and the three-metre Long Stone at Challacombe , which do use locally sourced large megaliths, suggests that larger stones would have been available had the sites' builders desired, and that the use of miniliths was perhaps deliberate. Wessex contains the two best known, though most atypical stone circles, Avebury and Stonehenge . All of the other Wiltshire circles are in
2324-786: The countless stones motif in folklore. The earliest recorded account comes from Philip Sidney 's The 7 Wonders of England , written prior to 1586. Sidney linked the motif to Stonehenge. Subsequently, the antiquary Richard Carew mentioned the story in his book, The Survey of Cornwall , published in 1602, noting that it was applied both the Stonehenge and to The Hurlers in Cornwall. The countless stones motif has been attributed to over five different stone circles, as well as several ruined long barrows such as Little Kit's Coty House in Kent. Mike Parker Pearson Michael Parker Pearson , FSA , FSA Scot , FBA (born 26 June 1957)
2407-528: The druids of the Iron Age or to the Danish settlers of Early Medieval times. In the 20th century, with the development of archaeology , archaeologists could investigate the circles in more detail. They dated them to the Late Neolithic and Bronze Ages. Since the late 20th century, many of these monuments were adopted as "sacred sites" by adherents of contemporary pagan religions such as Neo-Druidism , Wicca and
2490-448: The henge tradition of Eastern England , with the passage tomb tradition of Ireland. Aubrey Burl (counting tentative examples and burial mounds) noted that archaeologists assumed that for every stone circle that survived to the late 20th century, there would have been two lost. From the 1300 surviving examples, Burl calculated that there might have originally been around 4000 stone circles across Britain, Ireland and Brittany. Since
2573-405: The "Valley of Stones", a location at the foot of Crow Hill near to Littlebredy , which is located within the vicinity of many of these circles. With the exception of the circle at Litton Cheney , none display evidence of any outlying stones or earthworks around the stone circle. The archaeologists Stuart and Cecily Piggott believed that the circles of Dorset were probably of Bronze Age origin,
Withypool Stone Circle - Misplaced Pages Continue
2656-659: The 1950s, archaeologists have been able to use radiocarbon dating of the material around the stones in order to accurately date their original construction. As of 2000, the earliest known radiocarbon dating of a stone circle was from the Lochmaben Stone in Dumfriesshire , which was dated to 2525 ± 85 BCE, whilst the latest examples came from Sandy Road in Perth (1200 ± 150 BCE), from Drombeg in County Cork (790 ± 80 BCE), and from
2739-430: The British Isles at this time, with communities continuing to construct megalithic stone circles. The archaeologists J.M. Coles and A.F. Harding noted that across western Europe, the Bronze Age was "closely and logically connected" with the Late Neolithic which preceded it, and that the marker that is applied between the two by contemporary archaeologists is "arbitrary". The historian Ronald Hutton noted that, along with
2822-430: The British Isles, architectural changes were made to the style of chambered tomb, which may have been a forerunner of the later circular design of the stone rings. In the later Clyde tombs of south-western Scotland and the court-cairns of northern Ireland, crescent-shaped forecourts were constructed inside the tombs. This would have enabled more people to enter the tomb and take part in any rites there in sunlight. During
2905-457: The Channel Isles. There are 13 to be found on Dartmoor , including Brisworthy stone circle and Scorhill , and numerous examples to be found in Cornwall such as The Merry Maidens , The Hurlers and Boscawen-Un . In contrast to the over 70 stone circles known from Dartmoor, there are only two known from Exmoor : Porlock Stone Circle and Withypool Stone Circle . The contrast between
2988-422: The Early Neolithic another form of monument was also constructed in the British Isles, now known by archaeologists as causewayed enclosures . These consisted of massive circular ditch-and-bank earthworks. Construction of causewayed enclosures in the lowland regions of Southern England flourished around 3800 BCE, but by 3200 BCE almost all of them had been abandoned by their users. No equivalents have been found in
3071-505: The Early Neolithic in Brittany and the British Isles, the megalithic tradition of building chambered tombs for the dead had waxed and waned. The chambered tomb tradition lasted between about 4000 and 3500 BCE, although an earlier example, at Carrowmore in County Sligo, has been disputably dated to 5000 BCE. The length of this tradition led prehistorian Mike Parker Pearson to note that it
3154-508: The Five-Stone ring of Cashelkeety in County Kerry (715 ± 50 BCE). Burl said that, the calibration of these dates indicated that the stone circle tradition existed between 3300 and 900 BCE. The size of the megalithic rings varied, perhaps according to the number of people who would be using it during ceremonies. Burl calculated that the largest stone circle in terms of both diameter and area
3237-574: The Giants' Ring, and that it had originally been located on Mount Killaraus in Ireland, until the wizard Merlin moved it to Salisbury Plain. Many 19th-century antiquarians produced plans of the circles which were "inaccurate and slipshod." In the Mediaeval and Early Modern period onward, much folklore developed around the subject of the stone circles. In Britain, several stone circles have been connected to
3320-478: The Orcadian stone circles were cut from a horizontal seam of bedrock that was located just below the surface. These had been eased over a large pit and supported on stone trestles, after which wooden rollers and a sled were likely positioned underneath, allowing the megalith to be moved. One of these stones, which weighed over 10 tonnes, had been left in its original position poised on stone supports, to be discovered by
3403-472: The archaeological excavators. The number of stone circles is often misinterpreted, as damaged burial mounds, kerb cairns, or ring cairns are often confused for stone circle. The archetypal ‘stone circles’ of the mid-to-late Neolithic are far rarer than commonly assumed, appearing mostly in Cumbria , Cornwall , Wiltshire , and Western Scotland. They are connected morphologically with sites in Ireland, connecting
Withypool Stone Circle - Misplaced Pages Continue
3486-414: The archaeologist Aubrey Burl stated, "There was a change from the cramped, gloomy chamber of a tomb to the unroofed, wide ring, a change from darkness to light, from the dead to the living, from the grave to the sky." Similar observations were made by the historian Ronald Hutton , who commented that the circular shape of the rings "mirrors the sun, the full moon and the bounds of the horizon" and that such
3569-558: The archaeologist Harold St George Gray . Gray accompanied Hamilton on a visit to the site in August 1905, when he made a complete survey of the ring. Gray published his findings in a 1906 volume of the Proceedings of the Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society , in which he drew comparisons between the site and two Cornish stone circles that he had recently surveyed, Fernacre and Stannon Stone Circle . He suggested that
3652-545: The archaeologist Richard Bradley cautioned against understanding stone circles, timber circles, and earthen henges as distinct "types" of monument. The archaeologist Alexander Thom suggested that the stone circles fell into four broad classes: circles, flattened circles, egg-shaped rings, and ellipses. Some stone circles, such as that at Stanton Drew in Somerset , are approached by a short alignment of paired stones. There are also stone avenues that link different monuments in
3735-462: The choice of location, the size of the ring, the transport of the heavy stones, the laying out of the circle or ellipse, and the preparation of stone holes. They may have also had to plot astronomical alignments, making the task more difficult. Most stone circles were constructed upon flat ground, although some were instead built on a slope. At some sites, such as Kiltierney in County Fermanagh ,
3818-551: The choice of material used was important. For instance, at the Ring of Brodgar the stones used in the circle were produced from a variety of different sources. Very little is known about the process of quarrying the stone and transporting it to the sites of the circles. One exception is at Vestra Fiold in Orkney , where Colin Richards led an excavation that determined that the stones used for
3901-459: The circle had been the site of cremations , the cremated human remains then being buried within the nearby tumuli. In August 1915, Gray returned to the site. He noted that the circle was in largely the same condition as before, but that the ling and whortleberry bushes around the site were more stunted than they had previously been. Between 1982 and 1985, Fowler visited Withypool Stone Circle alongside other prehistoric stone monuments in Exmoor for
3984-677: The circle in a north-west direction. Other Bronze Age barrows visible from the circle are the Green Barrow , the Old Barrow , the Twitchen Barrows , the three Wam Barrows of Winsford Hill , and the barrow on top of Sherdon . Also visible from the circle is a scatter of over thirty stones on the Westwater Allotment; these are up to 0.5 m (1.6 ft) long and in 1988 two were reported as being standing. Elsewhere on Withypool Common
4067-725: The circles found on Dartmoor and Exmoor to the west, and the Stanton Drew stone circles to the north. It is also possible that the stone circles were linked to a number of earthen henges erected in Dorset around the same period. On average Dorset's earthen henges are four times larger than the stone circles. In what is now northern England, there was a particularly rich stone circle tradition in Cumbria. Several large megalithic rings were constructed here, such as Castlerigg stone circle , Swinside , and Long Meg and Her Daughters . Stone circles exist throughout Scotland, from Ninestane Rig in
4150-431: The circular stone monument on Almsworthy Common was "probably" the remains of a stone circle, although more recent assessments regard it one of the stone settings , a different form of monument which is more common across Exmoor. Archaeologists have dated these circles to the Late Neolithic or Early Bronze Age, and have noted that they are comparable to the stone circles found further south, on Dartmoor . In contrast to
4233-626: The dead". Other archaeologists have suggested that the stone might not represent ancestors, but rather other supernatural entities, such as deities. Aubrey Burl's gazetteer lists 1,303 stone circles in Britain, Ireland and Brittany. The largest number of these are found in Scotland, with 508 sites recorded. There are 316 in England; 187 in Ireland; 156 in Northern Ireland; 81 in Wales; 49 in Brittany; and 6 in
SECTION 50
#17330848376504316-457: The earliest standing stone monuments in the British Isles, the great circles such as Callanish on the Isle of Lewis and Stenness on the Isle of Orkney, were specifically constructed to align with the sun and moon, and the movements of the sun and moon across the local landscape. There has been much analysis and debate about these monuments. No simple explanations have emerged. The original purposes of
4399-510: The far south to more famous examples in the far north and particularly in the islands (where several form part of a UNESCO World Heritage Site ). The Callanish Stones are one of the best-known examples in the Outer Hebrides , while Orkney is known for its Neolithic monuments , including the Ring of Brodgar and the Standing Stones of Stenness . In Aberdeenshire , northeast Scotland, there are many recumbent stone circles to be found –
4482-400: The ground. Most are incomplete, and likely have been broken since the original erection of the circle. It is not known if all the stones in the circle come from the same natural rock, but a sample from one stone was examined and found to be a hard, pale grey gritstone , likely taken from the nearby Pickwell Down grits. There are conspicuous quartz veins in many of the circle's stones. The site
4565-446: The highland areas of northern Britain. Despite having excavated a number of these sites across southern Britain, archaeologists do not know their exact purpose. It has been suggested that they were camps, markets, cattle kraals or occasional settlements, or perhaps ritual centres for the celebration of seasonal festivals or cemeteries. As the transition from the Early Neolithic to the Late Neolithic took place in around 3000 BCE, there
4648-501: The idea of Thom's Megalithic Yard "remain[ed] contentious". Thom also argued that the builders of these circles were accomplished astronomers and deliberately included astronomical alignments in the rings. According to Parker Pearson, however, many of the circles do not appear to be based on any astronomical alignment. Pearson cautioned that Late Neolithic/Bronze Age conceptions of cosmology were likely very different from modern understandings of astronomy. However, it has been found that
4731-404: The island's south-eastern corner. They are most densely concentrated in south-western Britain and on the north-eastern horn of Scotland, near Aberdeen . The tradition of their construction may have lasted for 2,400 years, from 3300 to 900 BCE, with the major phase of building taking place between 3000 and 1,300 BCE. These stone circles typically show very little evidence of human visitation during
4814-431: The land was flattened especially for this purpose, although in other cases it is clear that the land had been flattened by earlier communities, who had used the land for settlement or agriculture. Aaron Watson has argued that various circles were located in a particular position to give the appearance of occupying the centre of the world, representing a microcosm of the surrounding area. In some instances it appears that
4897-512: The landscape, such as the West Kennet Avenue which links the Avebury henge to The Sanctuary . In some cases, the stone circles survive in such a damaged state that it is not possible to know what they originally looked like. In some examples, timber posts were replaced with stone ones, perhaps with the intention of making the monument more durable and protecting it from decay. In others, it
4980-400: The limits of medieval and post-medieval agriculture. For this reason it is likely that the surviving sites are not a reliable indicator of the original extent of these sites. The stone circle measures 36.4 metres (119 feet 5 inches) in diameter. In 1905, there were 37 stones remaining in the circle. At the time there were conspicuous gaps on the northern and western sides of the ring;
5063-641: The media, Parker Pearson has published articles in a variety of different sources, such as on the BBC website, has given interviews to groups such as Pagans for Archaeology and most recently discussed his career in an interview with Papers from the Institute of Archaeology . In 2012, Parker Pearson left the University of Sheffield and began teaching at the Institute of Archaeology , University College London , as Professor of British Later Prehistory. On 16 July 2015, he
SECTION 60
#17330848376505146-522: The midsummer solstice. and reported in New Scientist on 20 February 2021. Two geological articles published in 2022 proved that there was no link between Waun Mawn and the supposed "bluestone quarries" at Craig Rhosyfelin and Carn Goedog, and no link between Waun Mawn and Stonehenge. In a 2024 study published in The Holocene , Brian John re-examined the geological and archaeological evidence from
5229-510: The northern and western sides of the monument. The site was rediscovered in 1898 and surveyed by the archaeologist Harold St George Gray in 1905. Withypool Stone Circle is located on the south-western slope of Withypool Hill; some sources refer to it as Withypool Hill Stone Circle. The site is 381 metres (1,250 feet) above sea level. It is 670 metres (730 yards) east of Portford Bridge, and 4.4 kilometres (2.7 miles) south/south-west of Exford . The site slopes down from east to west. The topsoil
5312-433: The number of rings on the two moors may be because Dartmoor has abundant natural granite while Exmoor has none, instead having Devonian slates and Hangman Grits , both of which easily break up into small slabs, resulting in a general shortage of big stones on Exmoor. The two Exmoor stones are made from smaller stones, which archaeologists have termed miniliths . However, the presence of other Exmoor constructions, such as
5395-484: The others having been destroyed. Although stone circles have been erected throughout history by a variety of societies and for a variety of reasons, in the Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Ages , this particular tradition was limited to Great Britain, Ireland and the neighbouring area of continental Europe now known as Brittany . The rings were not distributed equally across this area, but were concentrated in several highland regions: north-eastern and central Scotland,
5478-480: The past when searching for fossils in his father's driveway gravel aged 4, extending that interest into the human past aged 6 when he read a library book entitled Fun with Archaeology . Deciding to study the subject at the undergraduate level, he attended the University of Southampton , attaining a first class BA with honours in Archaeology in 1979. He obtained his PhD from King's College, Cambridge in 1985, for
5561-709: The period immediately following their creation. This suggests that they were not sites used for rituals that left archaeologically visible evidence, but may have been deliberately left as "silent and empty monuments". The archaeologist Mike Parker Pearson suggests that in Neolithic Britain, stone was associated with the dead, and wood with the living. Other archaeologists have suggested that the stones might not represent ancestors, but rather other supernatural entities, such as deities. There are only two known prehistoric stone circles on Exmoor: Withypool and Porlock Stone Circle . The archaeologist Leslie Grinsell suggested that
5644-429: The recumbent is a massive stone lying on its side, generally to the southwest of the circle. In counties Cork and Kerry in southwest Ireland there is a preponderance of axial stone circles . As with the recumbent stone circles of Scotland a stone to the southwest lies on its side but the stone is not particularly large. In some cases, the stones were removed from the rings for use as a building material. In others,
5727-502: The sea. All but Rempstone—which is on the Isle of Purbeck —are located on the chalk hills west of Dorchester . The Dorset circles have a simplistic typology, being of comparatively small size, with none exceeding 28 metres in diameter. All are oval in shape, although perhaps have been altered from their original form. With the exception of the sandstone Rempstone circle, all consist of sarsen boulders. Much of this may have been obtained from
5810-562: The site has been disrupted by natural causes such as trees, the roots of which have shifted the location of the megaliths. Evidence for the destruction of stone circles first comes from the Late Bronze Age. Following the Christianisation of Britain in the Early Middle Ages , various Christian clergyman denounced those pagans who continued to venerate at stones in the landscape, which in some cases perhaps implied stone circles. By
5893-538: The site, and concluded that the "lost circle" of standing stones had never existed, and that there was no evidence to demonstrate a link with Stonehenge. He concluded that there had been considerable "interpretative inflation" at the site, driven by a desire to show a Stonehenge connection. From 2006 through to 2009, he served as the Vice-President of the Prehistoric Society . Interacting with various parts of
5976-436: The stone circles were built using a unit of measurement which he called the " megalithic yard ", about 2.72 feet (0.83 m). He came to this conclusion following more than forty years of surveying the monuments, aided by his son Archibald Stevenson Thom. Parker Pearson stated that "the idea of a standard unit of measurement is very plausible" but perhaps not as regular as Thom and others have argued. In 1980, Burl noted that
6059-513: The stone ring monuments has been widely debated by antiquarians and archaeologists for several centuries. These stone circles typically show very little evidence of human visitation during the period immediately following their creation. This suggests that they were not sites used for rituals that left archaeologically visible evidence. They may have been deliberately left as "silent and empty monuments". The archaeologists Mike Parker Pearson and Ramilsonina suggested that in Neolithic Britain, stone
6142-824: The stones perhaps in these areas may have been removed for use as road metal . There are ground depressions where some of these stones have been removed. In 1915 it was reported that one had been removed but that three additional stones had been found in the circle. By 1988, Martin J. F. Fowler reported that there were only 29 stones in the circle. Conversely, the following year the archaeologist Aubrey Burl reported 30 stones, of which three had fallen and 27 remained standing. Originally it may have included around 100 stones, spaced about one metre (3 feet 3 inches) apart. The stones themselves are small: on average they measure 10 cm (3.9 in) in height, 30 cm (one foot) in width, and 10 cm (3.9 in) in depth. The largest protrudes about 0.5 metres (1 foot 8 inches) from
6225-747: The subject. A media personality, Parker Pearson has appeared several times in the Channel 4 show Time Team in particular in one looking at the excavation of Durrington Walls in Wiltshire . He also appeared in the National Geographic Channel documentary Stonehenge Decoded , along with the PBS programme Nova : Secrets of Stonehenge . Parker Pearson was born in 1957, in Wantage , Berkshire . He would later inform interviewers that he first took an interest in
6308-426: The two Exmoor circles and in other monuments within the region. There are nevertheless other constructions in the area, such as the clapper bridge at Tarr Steps and the three-metre Long Stone at Challacombe , which do use locally sourced large megaliths. This suggests that larger stones would have been available had the sites' builders desired, and that the use of miniliths was therefore deliberate. Exmoor also has
6391-448: The two known Exmoor circles, over seventy such monuments have been identified on Dartmoor. This may be because Exmoor, unlike Dartmoor, has no natural granite . Instead it has Devonian slates and Hangman Grits , both of which easily break up into small slabs, resulting in a general shortage of big stones on Exmoor. This scarcity of large stones may explain why Neolithic and Bronze Age communities used small stones, termed miniliths , in
6474-591: Was Stanton Drew in Somerset, with a diameter of 112.2 metres (368 ft) and an area of 9,887 m (2.44 acres). Second came the Ring of Brodgar in Orkney at 103.6 metres (340 ft) in diameter and 8,430 m (2.08 acres) in area, whilst third was Avebury in Wiltshire, which had a diameter of 102.4 metres (336 ft) and an area of 8,236m² (2.04 acres). However, Burl did not count the outer stone circle at Avebury, which has
6557-403: Was "a relatively short-lived fashion in archaeological terms." In southern England, 84% of chambered tombs were built somewhere between a north-east to a south-east orientation with western directions almost entirely neglected. From these findings it is thus concluded that the east had some special significance regarding death and thus possibly the afterlife for their builders. In some parts of
6640-419: Was a period of particular turmoil within the British Isles, perhaps caused by an overuse of land, the failure of crops, famine, plague, climatic change, or an increase in population that was not supported by the food supply. The start of the Bronze Age in Britain was signalled by the introduction of bronze , an alloy of copper and usually tin . Ideologically, there is no evidence for a change in Brittany and
6723-582: Was accidentally rediscovered in 1898 when Archibald Hamilton was riding across Withypool Heath. His horse stumbled on one of the stones, and on further investigation he located other stones within the bracken . After the bracken on the heath was burned by farmers, Hamilton returned to pay closer attention to the circle. He contacted Colonel Bramble, the Vice President of the Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society , who put him in touch with
6806-432: Was associated with the dead and wood with the living. Bradley noted that this interpretation was "consistent with the archaeological evidence from Britain", where evidence for feasting and other human activities have been found at a range of timber sites but not at their stone counterparts. At the latter sites, there has been evidence of human remains. Bradley suggested that the stone circles may have been spaces "devoted to
6889-526: Was much economic and technological continuity. But there was considerable change in the style of monuments erected, particularly in southern and eastern England. By that date, the long barrows , causewayed enclosures , and cursuses which had predominated in the Early Neolithic had ceased to be built. They were replaced by circular monuments of various kinds. These include not only stone circles, but also earthen henges and timber circles . This transition toward circular monuments had symbolic associations. As
#649350