Misplaced Pages

#59940

32-511: The language jurisdictions governing much of Tjurabalan territory are provided by Djaru and Walmajarri . The combined population of the tribe in 2003 was approximately 1200 people. The Tjurabalan dwell in the Tanami Desert, in proximity to the Ngurrara , and encompasses the communities of Ringer Soak (Kundat Djaru), Billiluna , Mulan and Balgo . The Coyote Gold Mine is also located within

64-579: A nominative-accusative template. In Nhanda, absolutive case has a null suffix while ergative case is marked with some allomorph of the suffixes -nggu or -lu. See the common noun paradigm at play below: Intransitive Subject (ABS) pundu rain. ABS yatka-yu go- ABL . NFUT pundu yatka-yu rain.ABS go-ABL.NFUT Rain is coming. Transitive Subject-Object (ERG-ABS) nyarlu-nggu woman- ERG yawarda kangaroo. ABS nha-'i see- PAST nyarlu-nggu yawarda nha-'i woman-ERG kangaroo.ABS see-PAST The woman saw

96-600: A clear-cut explanation as to why these verbs have evolved this way. One explanation is that verbs such as "sneeze" used to have a direct object (the object being "nose" in the case of "sneeze") and over time lost these objects, yet kept their transitive behavior. In rare cases, such as the Australian Aboriginal language Nhanda , different nominal elements may follow a different case-alignment template. In Nhanda, common nouns have ergative-absolutive alignment—like in most Australian languages—but most pronouns instead follow

128-433: A kangaroo' (Free pronouns also display an ergative-absolutive case system) The possible ways to modify a noun into ergative case are with the following suffixes: -ŋgu , -gu , -lu , -gulu , -du , -u . The use of each morpheme depends, of course, on the immediately preceding phonological environment. For Pama-Nyungan languages generally it is common that they will take an ergative-absolutive case marking for nouns, and

160-527: A language that are spoken between certain family members (typically a married man and his mother-in-law) – such registers are common throughout native Australian languages. The population of Djaru speakers has greatly diminished since the late 19th century when white settlers entered the Djaru region and massacred its inhabitants. The Djaru people have since adopted certain aspects of western living (working and living on farmsteads and in towns) and have moved away from

192-584: A massacre of the local Tjurabalan people by white settlers was corroborated by forensic archaeological investigations in 2017. The Tjurabalan did not have much contact with whites until the 1950s since no extensive development projects had been envisaged for their area down to that time. In Ngalpil vs. Western Australia (2001) the Tjurabalan won recognition of their native title rights to 26,000 square kilometres (10,000 sq mi) of their traditional lands. This Indigenous Australians -related article

224-550: A nominative-accusative case marking for pronouns. There are very few verbs in Djaru (around forty). Bound pronouns can attach to Djaru verbs and they display a nominative-accusative declension (Djaru thus displays split ergativity, as its nouns and free pronouns follow an ergative-absolutive pattern). Verbs conjugate according to the following aspects: past, continuative past, past narrative, present, continuative present, purposive, continuative purposive, hortative, continuative hortative, imperative, continuative imperative, verbid. In

256-536: A noun in intransitive subject position (or transitive object position) is X , then it will be Y in a transitive subject position. Examples of the ergative-absolutive system for nouns in Djaru can be found in Tsunoda 1981: mawun man- ABS jan-an go- PRES mawun jan-an man-ABS go-PRES 'a man goes' mawun-du man- ERG ɟaɟi kangaroo- ABS lan-an spear- PRES mawun-du ɟaɟi lan-an man-ERG kangaroo-ABS spear-PRES 'a man spears

288-449: A noun phrase must be closed by a determiner . The default determiner (commonly called the article , which is suffixed to common nouns and usually translatable by "the" in English) is -a in the singular and -ak in the plural, the plural being marked only on the determiner and never the noun. For common nouns, this default determiner is fused with the ergative case marker. Thus one obtains

320-534: A word's meaning. Djaru does not contain any of the fricatives (e.g. [f], [v], [ʃ], [ð]) or affricates (e.g. [pf], [ts]); these sound types are rarely found in any Australian Aboriginal languages. Djaru consonants form clusters of no more than two phonemes. /ɽ/ can be heard as a flap [ɽ] or a glide [ɻ]. Djaru, like most Australian languages, has only three vowel sounds (a high-front vowel, high-back vowel, and low vowel), each vowel varies considerably according to its immediate phonetic environment. Djaru includes

352-569: Is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . Djaru language Djaru (Tjaru) is a Pama–Nyungan language spoken in the south-eastern Kimberley region of Western Australia . As with most Pama-Nyungan languages, Djaru includes single, dual and plural pronoun numbers. Djaru also includes sign-language elements in its lexicon (a common trait of Aboriginal Australian languages generally). Nouns in Djaru do not include gender classes, and apart from inflections, words are formed through roots, compounding or reduplication. Word order in Djaru

SECTION 10

#1732884049060

384-429: Is a language that has nominative-accusative marking on verbs and ergative–absolutive case marking on nouns. Georgian has an ergative alignment, but the agent is only marked with the ergative case in the perfective aspect (also known as the "aorist screeve "). Compare: K'ac- is the root of the word "man". In the first sentence (present continuous tense) the agent is in the nominative case ( k'aci  ). In

416-426: Is relatively free (again a common trait of Aboriginal Australian languages) and has the ability to split up noun phrases. The Djaru language has a relatively small number of verbs, as compared to most languages, and thus utilizes a system of ' preverbs ' and complex verbs to compensate. Djaru also has an avoidance language . Avoidance languages, sometimes known as 'mother-in-law languages', are special registers within

448-460: Is usually the most unmarked form of a word (exceptions include Nias and Tlapanec ). The following examples from Basque demonstrate an ergative–absolutive case marking system: Here -Ø represents a zero morpheme , as the absolutive case is unmarked in Basque. The forms for the ergative are -k after a vowel, and -ek after a consonant. It is a further rule in Basque grammar that in most cases

480-861: The object of a transitive verb , and differently from the agent (" subject ") of a transitive verb. Examples include Basque , Georgian , Mayan , Tibetan , and certain Indo-European languages (such as Pashto and the Kurdish languages and many Indo-Aryan languages like Hindi–Urdu ). It has also been attributed to the Semitic modern Aramaic (also called Neo-Aramaic) languages. Ergative languages are classified into two groups: those that are morphologically ergative but syntactically behave as accusative (for instance, Basque, Pashto and Urdu ) and those that, on top of being ergative morphologically, also show ergativity in syntax. No language has been recorded in which both

512-458: The above preverbs come out with the following meanings: jud sitting +   wandiɲ fall =   jud wandiɲ sit down jud + wandiɲ = {jud wandiɲ} sitting {} fall {} {sit down} dirib Ergative%E2%80%93absolutive alignment In linguistic typology , ergative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the single argument (" subject ") of an intransitive verb behaves like

544-620: The agent of a transitive verb differently. Such languages are said to operate with S/O syntactic pivot . This contrasts with nominative–accusative languages such as English , where the single argument of an intransitive verb and the agent of a transitive verb (both called the subject ) are treated alike and kept distinct from the object of a transitive verb. Such languages are said to operate with S/A (syntactic) pivot. (reference for figure: ) These different arguments are usually symbolized as follows: The relationship between ergative and accusative systems can be schematically represented as

576-419: The case marking of nouns), but nominative-accusative alignment in other parts (e.g., in the case marking of pronouns, or in person agreement ). This is known as split ergativity . An ergative language maintains a syntactic or morphological equivalence (such as the same word order or grammatical case ) for the object of a transitive verb and the single core argument of an intransitive verb, while treating

608-420: The daily practice of certain traditional ways of living. As a result, the Djaru language faces the combined pressures of a decrease in speaker population, an increased reliance of English among its speakers, as well as a white Australian government that has traditionally stood against the use or education of any original Australian languages. Word-initial phonemes in Djaru may be any consonant or semi-vowel with

640-401: The exception of alveolar taps /ɾ/ or the palatal laterals /ʎ/. A word can end with any phoneme except for a semi-vowel. Stress occurs on the initial syllable of a word, and on the initial syllable of a second morpheme. A stressed syllable tends to also be the highest in pitch, but stress in Djaru, as with pitch, is phonologically irrelevant. That is, stress and pitch have no essential bearing on

672-419: The following forms for gizon ("man"): gizon-a (man-the.sing.abs), gizon-ak (man-the.pl.abs), gizon-ak (man-the.sing.erg), gizon-ek (man-the.pl.erg). When fused with the article, the absolutive plural is homophonous with the ergative singular. See Basque grammar for details. In contrast, Japanese is a nominative–accusative language: In this language, the argument of the intransitive and agent of

SECTION 20

#1732884049060

704-655: The following table's ergative variations to the English pronouns, they , them , she , her , etc.). Djaru includes a unique word class (absent in most languages) known as the preverb class. Preverbs have two uses in Djaru: firstly they may be used similarly to adjectives in that they modify verbs but in doing so create new semantic units, secondly they may be used like nouns when attached with nominal suffixes. Some examples of preverbs: jud ('sitting'), dirib ('camping out'), wuɽug ('finishing'). When combined with verbs,

736-482: The following word classes: noun, free pronoun, adverb, preverb, verb, particle, interjection. Nouns in Djaru are modified if they are instrumental, locative, recipients, or in ergative position. The term 'ergative' refers to a category within ergative-absolutive declension wherein objects of transitive sentences and subjects of intransitive sentences are not morphologically equivalent to subjects of intransitive sentences. That is, in an ergative-absolutive language, if

768-572: The following: See morphosyntactic alignment for a more technical explanation and a comparison with nominative–accusative languages . The word subject , as it is typically defined in grammars of nominative-accusative languages, has a different application when referring to ergative–absolutive languages, or when discussing morphosyntactic alignment in general. Ergative languages tend to be either verb-final or verb-initial; there are few, if any, ergative SVO -languages. Ergativity can be found in both morphological and syntactic behavior. If

800-413: The language has morphological case , then the verb arguments are marked thus: If there is no case marking, ergativity can be marked through other means, such as in verbal morphology. For instance, Abkhaz and most Mayan languages have no morphological ergative case, but they have a verbal agreement structure that is ergative. In languages with ergative–absolutive agreement systems, the absolutive form

832-492: The morphological and syntactical ergative are present. Languages that belong to the former group are more numerous than those to the latter. Dyirbal is said to be the only representative of syntactic ergativity, yet it displays accusative alignment with certain pronouns. The ergative-absolutive alignment is in contrast to nominative–accusative alignment , which is observed in English and most other Indo-European languages, where

864-481: The native title of the Tjurabalan people. The explorers David Carnegie and Alfred Canning crossed their region, both being in the habit of capturing aboriginals and coercing them into revealing where fresh water springs might be found. Carnegie denied them water until their thirst made them collaborate. Canning had chains and neck padlocks manufactured which he applied to kidnapped Tjurabalan people in order to force them to guide his party to water. Oral tradition of

896-450: The object of a transitive verb is the absolutive , and the case used for the agent of a transitive verb is the ergative . In nominative-accusative languages, the case for the single argument of an intransitive verb and the agent of a transitive verb is the nominative , while the case for the direct object of a transitive verb is the accusative . Many languages have ergative–absolutive alignment only in some parts of their grammar (e.g., in

928-481: The second sentence, which shows ergative alignment, the root is marked with the ergative suffix -ma . However, there are some intransitive verbs in Georgian that behave like transitive verbs, and therefore employ the ergative case in the past tense. Consider: Although the verb "sneeze" is clearly intransitive, it is conjugated like a transitive verb. In Georgian there are a few verbs like these, and there has not been

960-412: The single argument of an intransitive verb ("She" in the sentence "She walks") behaves grammatically like the agent ( subject ) of a transitive verb ("She" in the sentence "She finds it") but different from the object of a transitive verb ("her" in the sentence "He likes her"). When ergative–absolutive alignment is coded by grammatical case , the case used for the single argument of an intransitive verb and

992-472: The transitive sentence are marked with the same nominative case particle ga , while the object of the transitive sentence is marked with the accusative case o . If one sets: A = agent of a transitive verb; S = argument of an intransitive verb; O = object of a transitive verb, then we can contrast normal nominative–accusative English with a hypothetical ergative English: A number of languages have both ergative and accusative morphology. A typical example

Tjurabalan - Misplaced Pages Continue

1024-448: The vast majority of cases verbs are modified with suffixes, and all conjugated verbs involve the root + suffix (i.e. there are no conjugations that represent the verb root on its own). As is suggested in Blake 1987, the ergative pronoun markings in Djaru may be a relatively new feature of the language, since the system bears few of the irregularities that are present in most languages (compare

#59940