Misplaced Pages

#936063

31-910: Thecodontosauridae is a family of basal sauropodomorph dinosaurs that are part of the Bagualosauria , known from fossil remains found exclusively in the Magnesian Conglomerate of Bristol , England , which dates back to the Rhaetian stage of the Late Triassic (although it could be as old as the Norian stage of the Late Triassic and as young as the Hettangian stage of the Early Jurassic ). Two genera are known: Agrosaurus and Thecodontosaurus ;

62-409: A correlation does not make a given case predicable, so ancestral characters should not be imputed to the members of a less species-rich basal clade without additional evidence. In general, clade A is more basal than clade B if B is a subgroup of the sister group of A or of A itself. In the context of large groups, the term "basal" is often used loosely to refer to positions closer to

93-698: A mix of archaic and apomorphic (derived) features that have only been sorted out via comparison with other angiosperms and their positions within the phylogenetic tree (the fossil record could potentially also be helpful in this respect, but is absent in this case). The cladogram below is based on Ramírez-Barahona et al. (2020), with species counts taken from the source indicated. Amborellales (1 species) Nymphaeales (about 90 species) Austrobaileyales (about 95 species) Magnoliids (about 9,000 species) Chloranthales (about 80 species) Monocots (about 70,000 species) Ceratophyllales (about 6 species) Eudicots (about 175,000 species) Within

124-475: A notable renaissance, principally with respect to theoretical content. Part of the theoretical material has to do with evolutionary areas (topics e and f above), the rest relates especially to the problem of classification. Taxonomy is that part of Systematics concerned with topics (a) to (d) above. The term "taxonomy" was coined by Augustin Pyramus de Candolle while the term "systematic" was coined by Carl Linnaeus

155-559: A primary tool in understanding, as nothing about an organism's relationships with other living things can be understood without it first being properly studied and described in sufficient detail to identify and classify it correctly. Scientific classifications are aids in recording and reporting information to other scientists and to laymen. The systematist , a scientist who specializes in systematics, must, therefore, be able to use existing classification systems, or at least know them well enough to skilfully justify not using them. Phenetics

186-468: A sister group to Homininae and are the basal genus in the great ape family Hominidae as a whole. Orangutans ( Pongo spp.) Humans ( Homo sapiens ) Chimpanzees ( Pan spp.) Gorillas ( Gorilla spp.) Subfamilies Homininae and Ponginae are both basal within Hominidae, but given that there are no nonbasal subfamilies in the cladogram it is unlikely the term would be applied to either. In general,

217-405: A statement to the effect that one group (e.g., orangutans) is basal, or branches off first, within another group (e.g., Hominidae) may not make sense unless the appropriate taxonomic level(s) (genus, in this case) is specified. If that level cannot be specified (i.e., if the clade in question is unranked) a more detailed description of the relevant sister groups may be needed. As can be seen, the term

248-461: A trait generally viewed as ancestral among the apes. Given that the deepest phylogenetic split in a group is likely to have occurred early in its history, identification of the most basal subclade(s) in a widely dispersed taxon or clade can provide valuable insight into its region of origin; however, the lack of additional species in a clade is not evidence that it carries the ancestral state for most traits. Most deceptively, people often believe that

279-553: Is a basal clade of extant angiosperms , consisting of the most species, genus, family and order within the group that are sister to all other angiosperms (out of a total of about 250,000 angiosperm species). The traits of Amborella trichopoda are regarded as providing significant insight into the evolution of flowering plants; for example, it has "the most primitive wood (consisting only of tracheids ), of any living angiosperm" as well as "simple, separate flower parts of indefinite numbers, and unsealed carpels". However, those traits are

310-415: Is likely a source of the mis-use of the term. Other famous examples of this phenomenon are the oviparous reproduction and nipple-less lactation of monotremes , a clade of mammals with just five species, and the archaic anatomy of the tuatara , a basal clade of lepidosaurian with a single species. The flowering plant family Amborellaceae , restricted to New Caledonia in the southwestern Pacific,

341-515: Is not reflective of ancestral states or proximity to the common ancestor of extant species. In this example, orangutans differ from the other genera in their Asian range. This fact plus their basal status provides a hint that the most recent common ancestor of extant great apes may have been Eurasian (see below), a suggestion that is consistent with other evidence. (Of course, lesser apes are entirely Asiatic.) However, orangutans also differ from African apes in their more highly arboreal lifestyle,

SECTION 10

#1732876755937

372-400: Is the field that (a) provides scientific names for organisms, (b) describes them, (c) preserves collections of them, (d) provides classifications for the organisms, keys for their identification, and data on their distributions, (e) investigates their evolutionary histories, and (f) considers their environmental adaptations. This is a field with a long history that in recent years has experienced

403-418: Is unnecessary and misleading. The term is more often applied when one branch (the one deemed "basal") is less diverse than another branch (this being the situation in which one would expect to find a basal taxon of lower minimum rank). The term may be equivocal in that it also refers to the direction of the root of the tree, which represents a hypothetical ancestor; this consequently may inaccurately imply that

434-586: The great apes , gorillas (eastern and western) are a sister group to chimpanzees , bonobos and humans . These five species form a clade, the subfamily Homininae (African apes), of which Gorilla has been termed the basal genus. However, if the analysis is not restricted to genera, the Homo plus Pan clade is also basal. Humans ( Homo sapiens ) Bonobos ( Pan paniscus ) Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) Eastern gorillas ( Gorilla beringei ) Western gorillas ( Gorilla gorilla ) Moreover, orangutans are

465-401: The analysis of the material that makes up the living part of a cell—such as the nucleus , organelles , and cytoplasm . Experimental systematics identifies and classifies animals based on the evolutionary units that comprise a species, as well as their importance in evolution itself. Factors such as mutations, genetic divergence, and hybridization all are considered evolutionary units. With

496-465: The direction of migration away from the area of origin can also be inferred (as in the Amaurobioides and Noctilionoidea cases below). As with all other traits, the phylogeographic location of one clade that connects to the root does not provide information about the ancestral state. Examples where such unjustified inferences may have been made include: Systematics Systematics is the study of

527-452: The diversification of living forms, both past and present, and the relationships among living things through time. Relationships are visualized as evolutionary trees (synonyms: phylogenetic trees , phylogenies). Phylogenies have two components: branching order (showing group relationships, graphically represented in cladograms ) and branch length (showing amount of evolution). Phylogenetic trees of species and higher taxa are used to study

558-449: The evolution of traits (e.g., anatomical or molecular characteristics) and the distribution of organisms ( biogeography ). Systematics, in other words, is used to understand the evolutionary history of life on Earth. The word systematics is derived from the Latin word of Ancient Greek origin systema , which means systematic arrangement of organisms. Carl Linnaeus used ' Systema Naturae ' as

589-719: The extant taxa of a given rank within the clade; this is one reason the term basal is highly deceptive, as the lack of additional species in one clade is taken as evidence of morphological affinity with ancestral taxa. Additionally, this qualification does not ensure that the diversity of extinct taxa (which may be poorly known) is represented. In phylogenetics, the term basal cannot be objectively applied to clades of organisms, but tends to be applied selectively and more controversially to groups or lineages thought to possess ancestral characters, or to such presumed ancestral traits themselves. In describing characters, "ancestral" or " plesiomorphic " are preferred to "basal" or " primitive ",

620-472: The father of taxonomy. Taxonomy, systematic biology, systematics, biosystematics, scientific classification, biological classification, phylogenetics: At various times in history, all these words have had overlapping, related meanings. However, in modern usage, they can all be considered synonyms of each other. For example, Webster's 9th New Collegiate Dictionary of 1987 treats "classification", "taxonomy", and "systematics" as synonyms. According to this work,

651-403: The following case:   Basal clade #1  Non-basal clade #1  Non-basal clade #2    Non-basal clade #3 While it is easy to identify a basal clade in such a cladogram, the appropriateness of such an identification is dependent on the accuracy and completeness of the diagram. It is often assumed in this example that the terminal branches of the cladogram depict all

SECTION 20

#1732876755937

682-405: The former is often considered to be the same animal as the latter. [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] This Sauropodomorph -related article is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . Basal (phylogenetics) While there must always be two or more equally "basal" clades sprouting from

713-437: The latter of which may carry false connotations of inferiority or a lack of complexity. The terms ''deep-branching'' or ''early-branching'' are similar in meaning, and equally may misrepresent extant taxa that lie on branches connecting directly to the root node as having more ancestral character states. Despite the ubiquity of the usage of basal , systematists try to avoid its usage because its application to extant groups

744-419: The root of every cladogram, those clades may differ widely in taxonomic rank , species diversity , or both. If C is a basal clade within D that has the lowest rank of all basal clades within D , C may be described as the basal taxon of that rank within D . The concept of a ' key innovation ' implies some degree of correlation between evolutionary innovation and diversification . However, such

775-423: The root than the majority, and in such cases, expressions like "very basal" can appear. A 'core clade' refers to the grouping that encompasses all constituent clades except for the basal clade(s) of the lowest rank within a larger clade, exemplified by core eudicots . No extant taxon is closer to the root than any other. A basal group in the stricter sense forms a sister group to the rest of the larger clade, as in

806-524: The sister group of a more species-rich clade displays ancestral features. An extant basal group may or may not resemble the last common ancestor of a larger clade to a greater degree than other groups, and is separated from that ancestor by the same amount of time as all other extant groups. However, there are cases where the unusually small size of a sister group does indeed correlate with an unusual number of ancestral traits, as in Amborella (see below). This

837-529: The specific branches, researchers are able to determine the applications and uses for modern-day systematics. These applications include: John Lindley provided an early definition of systematics in 1830, although he wrote of "systematic botany" rather than using the term "systematics". In 1970 Michener et al. defined "systematic biology" and " taxonomy " (terms that are often confused and used interchangeably) in relationship to one another as follows: Systematic biology (hereafter called simply systematics)

868-507: The study of biodiversity as a whole, whereas North Americans tend to use "taxonomy" more frequently. However, taxonomy, and in particular alpha taxonomy , is more specifically the identification, description, and naming (i.e. nomenclature) of organisms, while "classification" focuses on placing organisms within hierarchical groups that show their relationships to other organisms. All of these biological disciplines can deal with both extinct and extant organisms. Systematics uses taxonomy as

899-443: The terms originated in 1790, c. 1828, and in 1888 respectively. Some claim systematics alone deals specifically with relationships through time, and that it can be synonymous with phylogenetics , broadly dealing with the inferred hierarchy of organisms. This means it would be a subset of taxonomy as it is sometimes regarded, but the inverse is claimed by others. Europeans tend to use the terms "systematics" and "biosystematics" for

930-512: The title of his book. In the study of biological systematics, researchers use the different branches to further understand the relationships between differing organisms. These branches are used to determine the applications and uses for modern day systematics. Biological systematics classifies species by using three specific branches. Numerical systematics , or biometry , uses biological statistics to identify and classify animals. Biochemical systematics classifies and identifies animals based on

961-542: Was an attempt to determine the relationships of organisms through a measure of overall similarity, making no distinction between plesiomorphies (shared ancestral traits) and apomorphies (derived traits). From the late-20th century onwards, it was superseded by cladistics , which rejects plesiomorphies in attempting to resolve the phylogeny of Earth's various organisms through time. Today's systematists generally make extensive use of molecular biology and of computer programs to study organisms. Taxonomic characters are

Thecodontosauridae - Misplaced Pages Continue

#936063