Misplaced Pages

#109890

84-462: In a poll of 17 detective story writers and reviewers, this novel was voted as the eighth best locked room mystery of all time. A wealthy publisher and collector of precious stones and Chinese postage stamps has a luxurious suite in a hotel that serves to handle his non-publishing business and the comings and goings of his staff, his relatives, and his female friends. When an odd and anonymous little man arrives and refuses to state his business, no one

168-415: A consensus to emerge since the different parties may be unable to agree even on what the evidence is. When understood in the widest sense, it is not controversial that some form of theory-ladenness exists. But it is questionable whether it constitutes a serious threat to scientific evidence when understood in this sense. Philosophers in the 20th century started to investigate the "evidential relation",

252-405: A criminal act. The focus of criminal evidence is to connect physical evidence and reports of witnesses to a specific person. The path that physical evidence takes from the scene of a crime or the arrest of a suspect to the courtroom is called the chain of custody . In a criminal case, this path must be clearly documented or attested to by those who handled the evidence. If the chain of evidence

336-400: A proposition is what supports the proposition. It is usually understood as an indication that the proposition is true . The exact definition and role of evidence vary across different fields. In epistemology , evidence is what justifies beliefs or what makes it rational to hold a certain doxastic attitude. For example, a perceptual experience of a tree may serve as evidence to justify

420-403: A case. The decision-maker, often a jury, but sometimes a judge decides whether the burden of proof has been fulfilled. After deciding who will carry the burden of proof, the evidence is first gathered and then presented before the court: In a criminal investigation, rather than attempting to prove an abstract or hypothetical point, the evidence gatherers attempt to determine who is responsible for

504-515: A mechanical device lowered into the room through a chimney. King Ottokar's Sceptre (1938–1939) is the only Tintin adventure that is a locked-room mystery. No homicide is involved; rather the crime is the disappearance of the royal sceptre, which is bound to have disastrous consequences for the king. The British TV series Jonathan Creek has a particular 'speciality' for locked-room-murder style mysteries. The eponymous protagonist, Jonathan Creek, designs magic tricks for stage magicians, and

588-485: A perceived failure to fulfill the burden of proof. Two principal considerations are: The latter question depends on the nature of the point under contention and determines the quantity and quality of evidence required to meet the burden of proof. In a criminal trial in the United States, for example, the prosecution carries the burden of proof since the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond

672-453: A philosophical debate , there is an implicit burden of proof on the party asserting a claim, since the default position is generally one of neutrality or unbelief. Each party in a debate will therefore carry the burden of proof for any assertion they make in the argument, although some assertions may be granted by the other party without further evidence. If the debate is set up as a resolution to be supported by one side and refuted by another,

756-447: A pre-existing hypothesis. Logical positivists , on the other hand, held that this priority is semantic in nature, i.e. that the meanings of the theoretical terms used in the hypothesis are determined by what would count as evidence for them. Counterexamples for this view come from the fact that our idea of what counts as evidence may change while the meanings of the corresponding theoretical terms remain constant. The most plausible view

840-530: A proposition is evidence for a hypothesis if it entails the "development of the hypothesis". Intuitively, the development of the hypothesis is what the hypothesis states if it was restricted to only the individuals mentioned in the evidence. In the case above, we have the hypothesis " ∀ x ( s w a n ( x ) → w h i t e ( x ) ) {\displaystyle \forall x(swan(x)\rightarrow white(x))} " (all swans are white) which, when restricted to

924-408: A reasonable doubt . Similarly, in most civil procedures , the plaintiff carries the burden of proof and must convince a judge or jury that the preponderance of the evidence is on their side. Other legal standards of proof include "reasonable suspicion", "probable cause" (as for arrest ), " prima facie evidence", "credible evidence", "substantial evidence", and "clear and convincing evidence". In

SECTION 10

#1732863270110

1008-435: A simpler formula would appear more evident to them. Riofrio has detected some characteristics that are present in evident arguments and proofs. The more they are evident, the more these characteristics will be present. There are six intrinsic characteristics of evidence: In addition, four subjective or external characteristics can be detected over those things that are more or less evident: These ten characteristics of what

1092-455: A symptom of the truth of the hypothesis. Against this approach, it has been argued that it is too liberal because it allows accidental generalizations as evidence. Finding a nickel in one's pocket, for example, raises the probability of the hypothesis that "All the coins in my pockets are nickels". But, according to Alvin Goldman , it should not be considered evidence for this hypothesis since there

1176-474: Is Edward D. Hoch , whose short stories feature a detective, Dr. Sam Hawthorne, whose main role is as a country physician. The majority of Hoch stories feature impossible crimes; one appeared in EQMM every month from May 1973 through January 2008. Hoch's protagonist is a gifted amateur detective who uses pure brainpower to solve his cases. The French writer Paul Halter , who wrote over 30 novels, almost exclusively in

1260-448: Is accumulated through observations of phenomena that occur in the natural world, or which are created as experiments in a laboratory or other controlled conditions. Scientists tend to focus on how the data used during statistical inference are generated. Scientific evidence usually goes towards supporting or rejecting a hypothesis . The burden of proof is on the person making a contentious claim. Within science, this translates to

1344-620: Is broken, a defendant may be able to persuade the judge to declare the evidence inadmissible . Presenting evidence before the court differs from the gathering of evidence in important ways. Gathering evidence may take many forms; presenting evidence that tends to prove or disprove the point at issue is strictly governed by rules. Failure to follow these rules leads to any number of consequences. In law, certain policies allow (or require) evidence to be excluded from consideration based either on indicia relating to reliability, or broader social concerns. Testimony (which tells) and exhibits (which show) are

1428-436: Is built. This evidence-based method is meant to make it possible for philosophy to overcome many of the traditionally unresolved disagreements and thus become a rigorous science. This far-reaching claim of phenomenology, based on absolute certainty, is one of the focal points of criticism by its opponents. Thus, it has been argued that even knowledge based on self-evident intuition is fallible. This can be seen, for example, in

1512-485: Is closely related to the idea that how rational someone is, is determined by how they respond to evidence. Another intuition, which is more dominant in the philosophy of science, focuses on evidence as that which confirms scientific hypotheses and arbitrates between competing theories. On this view, it is essential that evidence is public so that different scientists can share the same evidence. This leaves publicly observable phenomena like physical objects and events as

1596-445: Is committed in circumstances under which it appeared impossible for the perpetrator to enter the crime scene , commit the crime, and leave undetected. The crime in question typically involves a situation whereby an intruder could not have left; for example the original literal "locked room": a murder victim found in a windowless room locked from the inside at the time of discovery. Following other conventions of classic detective fiction,

1680-535: Is elevated to one of the basic principles of philosophy, giving philosophy the ultimate justifications that are supposed to turn it into a rigorous science. In a more modern usage, the plural form is also used. In academic discourse, evidence plays a central role in epistemology and in the philosophy of science . Reference to evidence is made in many different fields, like in science, in the legal system, in history, in journalism and in everyday discourse. A variety of different attempts have been made to conceptualize

1764-492: Is especially relevant for choosing between competing theories. So in the case above, evidence plays the role of neutral arbiter between Newton's and Einstein's theory of gravitation. This is only possible if scientific evidence is public and uncontroversial so that proponents of competing scientific theories agree on what evidence is available. These requirements suggest scientific evidence consists not of private mental states but of public physical objects or events . It

SECTION 20

#1732863270110

1848-624: Is eventually explained rationally. Notable practitioners of the period were Fredric Brown , Paul Chadwick and, to a certain extent, Cornell Woolrich , although these writers tended to rarely use the Private Eye protagonists that many associate with pulp fiction. Quite a few comic book impossible crimes seem to draw on the "weird menace" tradition of the pulps. However, celebrated writers such as G. K. Chesterton , Arthur Conan Doyle , Clayton Rawson , and Sax Rohmer have also had their works adapted to comic book form. In 1934, Dashiell Hammett created

1932-741: Is evident allowed Riofrio to formulate a test of evidence to detect the level of certainty or evidence that one argument or proof could have. Important theorists of evidence include Bertrand Russell , Willard Van Orman Quine , the logical positivists , Timothy Williamson , Earl Conee and Richard Feldman. Russell, Quine and the logical positivists belong to the empiricist tradition and hold that evidence consists in sense data, stimulation of one's sensory receptors and observation statements, respectively. According to Williamson, all and only knowledge constitute evidence. Conee and Feldman hold that only one's current mental states should be considered evidence. The guiding intuition within epistemology concerning

2016-402: Is no lawful connection between this one nickel and the other coins in the pocket. Hypothetico-deductivism is a non-probabilistic approach that characterizes the evidential relations in terms of deductive consequences of the hypothesis. According to this view, "evidence for a hypothesis is a true observational consequence of that hypothesis". One problem with the characterization so far

2100-461: Is no unitary concept corresponding to the different theoretical roles ascribed to evidence, i.e. that we do not always mean the same thing when we talk of evidence. On the other hand, Aristotle, phenomenologists, and numerous scholars accept that there could be several degrees of evidence. For instance, while the outcome of a complex equation may become more or less evident to a mathematician after hours of deduction, yet with little doubts about it,

2184-400: Is often called on to solve cases where the most important element of the mystery is clearly how the crime was committed, such as a man who allegedly shot himself in a sealed bunker when he had crippling arthritis in his hands, how a woman was shot in a sealed room with no gun and without the window being opened or broken, how a dead body could have vanished from a locked room when the only door

2268-474: Is often combined with the idea that evidence, propositional or otherwise, determines what it is rational for us to believe. But it can be rational to have a false belief. This is the case when we possess misleading evidence. For example, it was rational for Neo in the Matrix movie to believe that he was living in the 20th century because of all the evidence supporting his belief despite the fact that this evidence

2352-534: Is often held as an argument against this view since sensory impressions are commonly treated as evidence. Propositionalism is sometimes combined with the view that only attitudes to true propositions can count as evidence. On this view, the belief that the corner shop sells milk only constitutes evidence for the belief that the corner shop sells dairy products if the corner shop actually sells milk. Against this position, it has been argued that evidence can be misleading but still count as evidence. This line of thought

2436-411: Is often held that evidence is in some sense prior to the hypotheses it confirms. This was sometimes understood as temporal priority , i.e. that we come first to possess the evidence and later form the hypothesis through induction. But this temporal order is not always reflected in scientific practice, where experimental researchers may look for a specific piece of evidence in order to confirm or disconfirm

2520-426: Is sometimes held that only propositional mental states can play this role, a position known as "propositionalism". A mental state is propositional if it is an attitude directed at a propositional content. Such attitudes are usually expressed by verbs like "believe" together with a that-clause, as in "Robert believes that the corner shop sells milk". Such a view denies that sensory impressions can act as evidence. This

2604-445: Is surprised; he is locked (from outside only ) in an anteroom with a bowl of fruit (including tangerines , also known as Chinese oranges) and left to await the publisher's arrival. When the door is unlocked, though, a truly bizarre scene is displayed. The little man's skull is crushed, his clothing is reversed, back to front, all the furnishings of the room have been turned backwards — and two African spears have been inserted between

The Chinese Orange Mystery - Misplaced Pages Continue

2688-403: Is that hypotheses usually contain relatively little information and therefore have few if any deductive observational consequences. So the hypothesis by itself that there is a fire does not entail that smoke is observed. Instead, various auxiliary assumptions have to be included about the location of the smoke, the fire, the observer, the lighting conditions, the laws of chemistry, etc. In this way,

2772-402: Is that justified belief has to be connected to or grounded in the mental state acting as its evidence. So Phoebe's belief that the speakers are on is not justified by her auditory experience if the belief is not based in this experience. This would be the case, for example, if Phoebe has both the experience and the belief but is unaware of the fact that the music is produced by the speakers. It

2856-532: Is that this priority is epistemic in nature, i.e. that our belief in a hypothesis is justified based on the evidence while the justification for the belief in the evidence does not depend on the hypothesis. A central issue for the scientific conception of evidence is the problem of underdetermination , i.e. that the evidence available supports competing theories equally well. So, for example, evidence from our everyday life about how gravity works confirms Newton's and Einstein's theory of gravitation equally well and

2940-415: Is the hypothesis rejected: this can be referred to as ' refutation of the hypothesis'. The rules for evidence used by science are collected systematically in an attempt to avoid the bias inherent to anecdotal evidence . In law, the production and presentation of evidence depend first on establishing on whom the burden of proof lies. Admissible evidence is that which a court receives and considers for

3024-420: Is therefore unable to establish consensus among scientists. But in such cases, it is often the gradual accumulation of evidence that eventually leads to an emerging consensus. This evidence-driven process towards consensus seems to be one hallmark of the sciences not shared by other fields. Another problem for the conception of evidence in terms of confirmation of hypotheses is that what some scientists consider

3108-499: Is why evidence is often associated with the controversial thesis that it constitutes an immediate access to truth. In this sense, the evidently given phenomenon guarantees its own truth and is therefore considered indubitable. Due to this special epistemological status of evidence, it is regarded in phenomenology as the basic principle of all philosophy. In this form, it represents the lowest foundation of knowledge, which consists of indubitable insights upon which all subsequent knowledge

3192-468: The scientific method . The problems of underdetermination and theory-ladenness are two obstacles that threaten to undermine the role of scientific evidence. In law , evidence is information to establish or refute claims relevant to a case, such as testimony , documentary evidence , and physical evidence . The relation between evidence and a supported statement can vary in strength, ranging from weak correlation to indisputable proof . Theories of

3276-582: The 1920s and 1930s, many authors wrote locked-room mysteries, such as S. S. Van Dine in The Canary Murder Case (1927), Ellery Queen in The Chinese Orange Mystery (1934), and Freeman Wills Crofts in such novels as Sudden Death and The End of Andrew Harrison (1938). Pulp magazines in the 1930s often contained impossible crime tales, dubbed weird menace , in which a series of supernatural or science-fiction type events

3360-512: The 1950s and early 1960s, notably Martin Meroy and Boileau-Narcejac , who joined forces to write several locked-room novels. They also co-authored the psychological thrillers which brought them international fame, two of which were adapted for the screen as Vertigo ( 1954 novel ; 1958 film) and Diabolique (1955 film). The most prolific writer during the period immediately following the Golden Age

3444-589: The Belgian Stanislas-André Steeman were other important "impossible crime" writers, Vindry being the most prolific with 16 novels. Edgar Faure , who later to become Prime Minister of France, also wrote in the genre, but was not particularly successful. During the Golden Age of Detective Fiction , English-speaking writers dominated the genre, but after the 1940s there was a general waning of English-language output. French authors continued writing into

The Chinese Orange Mystery - Misplaced Pages Continue

3528-667: The Speckled Band " (1892) and " The Adventure of the Empty House " (1903), two Sherlock Holmes stories by Arthur Conan Doyle ; " The Problem of Cell 13 " (1905) by Jacques Futrelle , featuring "The Thinking Machine" Augustus S. F. X. Van Dusen ; and Le Mystère de la Chambre Jaune ( The Mystery of the Yellow Room ), written in 1907 by French journalist and author Gaston Leroux . G. K. Chesterton 's Father Brown stories, beginning in 1911, often featured locked-room mysteries. In

3612-714: The belief that there is a tree. In this role, evidence is usually understood as a private mental state . In phenomenology , evidence is limited to intuitive knowledge, often associated with the controversial assumption that it provides indubitable access to truth. In the philosophy of science , evidence is material that confirms or disconfirms scientific hypotheses , acting as a neutral arbiter between competing theories. Measurements of Mercury's "anomalous" orbit , for example, are seen as evidence that confirms Einstein 's theory of general relativity . Philosophers of science tend to understand evidence not as mental states but as observable physical objects or events, secured by following

3696-413: The best candidates for evidence, unlike private mental states. One problem with these approaches is that the resulting definitions of evidence, both within a field and between fields, vary a lot and are incompatible with each other. For example, it is not clear what a bloody knife and a perceptual experience have in common when both are treated as evidence in different disciplines. This suggests that there

3780-606: The best locked-room mystery novel of all time by 17 authors and reviewers, although Carr himself names Leroux's The Mystery of the Yellow Room as his favorite. (Leroux's novel was named third in that same poll; Hake Talbot 's Rim of the Pit (1944) was named second. ) Three other Carr/Dickson novels were in the top ten of the 1981 list: The Crooked Hinge (1938), The Judas Window (1938), and The Peacock Feather Murders (1937). In French, Pierre Boileau , Thomas Narcejac , Gaston Boca, Marcel Lanteaume, Pierre Véry , Noel Vindry, and

3864-455: The body and its clothing, stiffening it into immobility. The circumstances are such that someone has been observing every entrance to the room, and no one has apparently entered or left. The situation is further complicated by some valuable jewelry and stamps, the publisher's business affairs and romantic affaires , and a connection with "backwardness" for seemingly every character. It takes the considerable talents of Ellery Queen to sort through

3948-412: The burden resting on presenters of a paper, in which the presenters argue for their specific findings. This paper is placed before a panel of judges where the presenter must defend the thesis against all challenges. When evidence is contradictory to predicted expectations, the evidence and the ways of making it are often closely scrutinized (see experimenter's regress ) and only at the end of this process

4032-406: The comic strip Secret Agent X9 , illustrated by Alex Raymond , which contained a locked-room episode. One American comic book series that made good use of locked-room mysteries is Mike W. Barr's Maze Agency . John Dickson Carr , who also wrote as Carter Dickson, was known as "master of the locked-room mystery". His 1935 novel The Hollow Man (US title: The Three Coffins ) was in 1981 voted

4116-409: The conditional probability of this hypothesis relative to the evidence is higher than the unconditional probability of the hypothesis by itself. Smoke (E), for example, is evidence that there is a fire (H), because the two usually occur together, which is why the likelihood of fire given that there is smoke is higher than the likelihood of fire by itself. On this view, evidence is akin to an indicator or

4200-497: The crime committed is usually less severe than murder. One notable author is Enid Blyton , who wrote several juvenile detective series, often featuring seemingly impossible crimes that her young amateur detectives set out to solve. The Hardy Boys novel While the Clock Ticked was (originally) about a locked and isolated room where a man seeks privacy, but receives mysterious threatening messages there. The messages are delivered by

4284-618: The crime is what drives the protagonist to look beyond these appearances and solve the puzzle. Edgar Allan Poe 's " The Murders in the Rue Morgue " (1841) is generally considered the first locked-room mystery. However, Robert Adey credits Sheridan Le Fanu for "A Passage in the Secret History of an Irish Countess" (1838), which was published three years before Poe's "Rue Morgue". Other early locked-room mysteries include Israel Zangwill 's The Big Bow Mystery (1892); " The Adventure of

SECTION 50

#1732863270110

4368-399: The domain "{a}", containing only the one individual mentioned in the evidence, entails the evidence, i.e. " s w a n ( a ) ∧ w h i t e ( a ) {\displaystyle swan(a)\land white(a)} " (this swan is white). One important shortcoming of this approach is that it requires that the hypothesis and the evidence are formulated in

4452-455: The evidence to be may already involve various theoretical assumptions not shared by other scientists. This phenomenon is known as theory-ladenness . Some cases of theory-ladenness are relatively uncontroversial, for example, that the numbers output by a measurement device need additional assumptions about how this device works and what was measured in order to count as meaningful evidence. Other putative cases are more controversial, for example,

4536-518: The evidential relation becomes a three-place relation between evidence, hypothesis and auxiliary assumptions. This means that whether a thing is evidence for a hypothesis depends on the auxiliary assumptions one holds. This approach fits well with various scientific practices. For example, it is often the case that experimental scientists try to find evidence that would confirm or disconfirm a proposed theory. The hypothetico-deductive approach can be used to predict what should be observed in an experiment if

4620-403: The evidential relation examine the nature of this connection. Probabilistic approaches hold that something counts as evidence if it increases the probability of the supported statement. According to hypothetico-deductivism , evidence consists in observational consequences of a hypothesis. The positive-instance approach states that an observation sentence is evidence for a universal statement if

4704-409: The evidential relation in terms of probabilities. They hold that all that is necessary is that the existence of the evidence increases the likelihood that the hypothesis is true. This can be expressed mathematically as P ( H ∣ E ) > P ( H ) {\displaystyle P(H\mid E)>P(H)} . In words: a piece of evidence (E) confirms a hypothesis (H) if

4788-432: The fact that Socrates's wisdom is irrelevant here. According to the positive-instance approach , an observation sentence is evidence for a universal hypothesis if the sentence describes a positive instance of this hypothesis. For example, the observation that "this swan is white" is an instance of the universal hypothesis that "all swans are white". This approach can be given a precise formulation in first-order logic :

4872-449: The fact that even among phenomenologists, there is much disagreement about the basic structures of experience. In the sciences, evidence is understood as what confirms or disconfirms scientific hypotheses . The term "confirmation" is sometimes used synonymously with that of "evidential support". Measurements of Mercury's "anomalous" orbit, for example, are seen as evidence that confirms Einstein's theory of general relativity. This

4956-499: The facts in your possession essential to a clear solution of the mystery." This was the only Ellery Queen novel to be included in a list of the top ten "impossible crime" mysteries of all time (created by noted locked-room mystery writer Edward D. Hoch ). The Chinese Orange Mystery was eighth on the list. The novel was loosely adapted for the 1936 film The Mandarin Mystery , starring Eddie Quillan as Ellery Queen. Some elements of

5040-403: The former requiring evidence beyond a reasonable doubt , the latter considering only which side has the preponderance of evidence , or whether the proposition is more likely true or false. The parts of a legal case that are not in controversy are known, in general, as the "facts of the case." Beyond any facts that are undisputed, a judge or jury is usually tasked with being a trier of fact for

5124-402: The idea that different people or cultures perceive the world through different, incommensurable conceptual schemes , leading them to very different impressions about what is the case and what evidence is available. Theory-ladenness threatens to impede the role of evidence as neutral arbiter since these additional assumptions may favor some theories over others. It could thereby also undermine

SECTION 60

#1732863270110

5208-402: The implausible consequence that many of simple everyday-beliefs would be unjustified. The more common view is that all kinds of mental states, including stored beliefs that are currently unconscious, can act as evidence. It is sometimes argued that the possession of a mental state capable of justifying another is not sufficient for the justification to happen. The idea behind this line of thought

5292-540: The introductory device of "J.J. McC." lasts only through the tenth novel, Halfway House , then vanishes (though J.J. appears onstage in Face to Face in 1967). The "nationality" mysteries had the unusual feature of a "Challenge to the Reader" just before the ending is revealed—the novel breaks the fourth wall and speaks directly to the reader. "I maintain that at this point in your reading of The Chinese Orange Mystery you have all

5376-518: The locked-room genre, has been described as the natural successor to John Dickson Carr . Although strongly influenced by Carr and Agatha Christie , he has a unique writing style featuring original plots and puzzles. A collection of ten of his short stories, entitled The Night of the Wolf , has been translated into English. The Japanese writer Soji Shimada has been writing impossible crime stories since 1981. The first, The Tokyo Zodiac Murders (1981), and

5460-562: The locked-room theme into medieval times. The book's plot suggests that Holy Roman Emperor Frederick I had not drowned in a river, as history records, but died mysteriously at night while a guest at the castle of a sinister Armenian noble. The book features various suspects, each of whom had a clever means of killing the Emperor without entering the room where he slept – all these means having been available in medieval times. The locked-room genre also appears in children's detective fiction, although

5544-451: The motives and lies and arrive at the twisted logic that underlies every aspect of this very unusual crime. (See Ellery Queen .) The character of Ellery Queen and the locked room mystery aspect were probably initially suggested by the novels featuring detective Philo Vance by S.S. Van Dine , which were very popular at the time. At this point in time, however, Van Dine's sales were dropping and Queen's were beginning to rise. This novel

5628-503: The nature of evidence. These attempts often proceed by starting with intuitions from one field or in relation to one theoretical role played by evidence and go on to generalize these intuitions, leading to a universal definition of evidence. One important intuition is that evidence is what justifies beliefs . This line of thought is usually followed in epistemology and tends to explain evidence in terms of private mental states, for example, as experiences, other beliefs or knowledge. This

5712-406: The novel were used as the basis for the 1941 film Ellery Queen's Penthouse Mystery , which was then novelized as The Penthouse Mystery by a ghost writer and published as by Ellery Queen . Locked room mystery The " locked-room " or " impossible crime " mystery is a type of crime seen in crime and detective fiction . The crime in question, typically murder ("locked-room murder"),

5796-400: The other issues of a case. Evidence and rules are used to decide questions of fact that are disputed, some of which may be determined by the legal burden of proof relevant to the case. Evidence in certain cases (e.g. capital crimes ) must be more compelling than in other situations (e.g. minor civil disputes), which drastically affects the quality and quantity of evidence necessary to decide

5880-465: The purposes of deciding a particular case. Two primary burden-of-proof considerations exist in law. The first is on whom the burden rests. In many, especially Western, courts, the burden of proof is placed on the prosecution in criminal cases and the plaintiff in civil cases. The second consideration is the degree of certitude proof must reach, depending on both the quantity and quality of evidence. These degrees are different for criminal and civil cases,

5964-418: The reader is normally presented with the puzzle and all of the clues , and is encouraged to solve the mystery before the solution is revealed in a dramatic climax . The prima facie impression from a locked room crime is that the perpetrator is a dangerous, supernatural entity capable of defying the laws of nature by walking through walls or vanishing into thin air. The need for a rational explanation for

6048-479: The relation between evidence and the proposition supported by it. The issue of the nature of the evidential relation concerns the question of what this relation has to be like in order for one thing to justify a belief or to confirm a hypothesis. Important theories in this field include the probabilistic approach , hypothetico-deductivism and the positive-instance approach . Probabilistic approaches , also referred to as Bayesian confirmation theory , explain

6132-459: The role of evidence is that it is what justifies beliefs . For example, Phoebe's auditory experience of the music justifies her belief that the speakers are on. Evidence has to be possessed by the believer in order to play this role. So Phoebe's own experiences can justify her own beliefs but not someone else's beliefs. Some philosophers hold that evidence possession is restricted to conscious mental states, for example, to sense data. This view has

6216-430: The same vocabulary, i.e. use the same predicates, like " s w a n {\displaystyle swan} " or " w h i t e {\displaystyle white} " above. But many scientific theories posit theoretical objects, like electrons or strings in physics, that are not directly observable and therefore cannot show up in the evidence as conceived here. In scientific research evidence

6300-520: The second, Murder in the Crooked House (1982), are the only ones to have been translated into English. The themes of the Japanese novels are far more grisly and violent than those of the more genteel Anglo-Saxons. Dismemberment is a preferred murder method. Despite the gore, most norms of the classic detective fiction novel are strictly followed. Umberto Eco , in his 2000 novel Baudolino , takes

6384-419: The sentence describes a positive instance of this statement. Understood in its broadest sense, evidence for a proposition is what supports this proposition. Traditionally, the term is sometimes understood in a narrower sense: as the intuitive knowledge of facts that are considered indubitable. In this sense, only the singular form is used. This meaning is found especially in phenomenology, in which evidence

6468-403: The term "evidence" in phenomenology shows many parallels to its epistemological usage, but it is understood in a narrower sense. Thus, evidence here specifically refers to intuitive knowledge, which is described as "self-given" ( selbst-gegeben ). This contrasts with empty intentions, in which one refers to states of affairs through a certain opinion, but without an intuitive presentation. This

6552-402: The theory was true. It thereby explains the evidential relation between the experiment and the theory. One problem with this approach is that it cannot distinguish between relevant and certain irrelevant cases. So if smoke is evidence for the hypothesis "there is fire", then it is also evidence for conjunctions including this hypothesis, for example, "there is fire and Socrates was wise", despite

6636-611: The two main categories of evidence presented at a trial or hearing. In the United States, evidence in federal court is admitted or excluded under the Federal Rules of Evidence . The burden of proof is the obligation of a party in an argument or dispute to provide sufficient evidence to shift the other party's or a third party's belief from their initial position. The burden of proof must be fulfilled by both establishing confirming evidence and negating oppositional evidence. Conclusions drawn from evidence may be subject to criticism based on

6720-523: The victim's name is never known—and it doesn't really matter to the solution. The introduction to this novel contained a detail which is now not considered part of the Ellery Queen canon. The introduction is written as by the anonymous "J.J. McC.", a friend of the Queens. Other details of the lives of the fictional Queen family contained in earlier introductions have now disappeared and are never mentioned again;

6804-496: Was Japanese: Akimitsu Takagi wrote almost 30 locked-room mysteries, starting in 1949 and continuing to his death in 1995. A number have been translated into English. In Robert van Gulik 's mystery novel The Chinese Maze Murders (1951), one of the cases solved by Judge Dee is an example of the locked-room subgenre. The genre continued into the 1970s and beyond. Bill Pronzini 's Nameless Detective novels feature locked-room puzzles. The most prolific creator of impossible crimes

6888-643: Was in full view of someone else, etc. In the 21st century, examples of popular detective series novels that include locked-room type puzzles are The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2005) by Stieg Larssen , Bloodhounds (2004) by Peter Lovesey , and In the Morning I'll Be Gone (2014) by Adrian McKinty , while locked-room puzzles are a major plot point and discussed at length in the visual novels Umineko When They Cry , Danganronpa and Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney: Dual Destinies . Evidence Evidence for

6972-460: Was misleading since it was part of a simulated reality. This account of evidence and rationality can also be extended to other doxastic attitudes, like disbelief and suspension of belief. So rationality does not just demand that we believe something if we have decisive evidence for it, it also demands that we disbelieve something if we have decisive evidence against it and that we suspend belief if we lack decisive evidence either way. The meaning of

7056-405: Was the eighth in a long series of novels featuring Ellery Queen, the first nine containing a nationality in the title. This particular novel is much cited in reference works discussing ways and means of the locked room mystery, including the famous "Locked Room Lecture" from The Hollow Man because of its unusual solution. It is also unusual because it is one of the few murder mysteries in which

#109890