71-552: The T54 was a series of prototype American tanks of the 1950s with three different turrets, all armed with a 105 mm gun, mounted on the M48 Patton chassis. The T54 had a conventional turret with an autoloader with 3 shells, the T54E1 had an oscillating design with an autoloader , and the T54E2 had a conventional turret with a human loader. The turret on the T54E1 was similar to that of
142-609: A heavy tank , the Pershing was a significant upgrade from the M4 Sherman in terms of firepower, protection, and mobility. On the other hand, it was unsatisfactory for a medium tank (because it used the same engine that powered the M4A3, which was some ten tons lighter) and its transmission was somewhat unreliable. In 1948, the M26E2 version was developed with a new powerplant. Eventually, the new version
213-406: A Panther upper glacis welded to the mantlet, covering the front. This added about five tonnes to the tank weight, requiring extra armor added to the turret for balance. An account of the combat actions of this tank appeared in the war memoir Another River, Another Town , by John P. Irwin, who was the tank gunner. Zaloga described three actions in his book. On 4 April, between Weser and Nordheim,
284-446: A front sprocket drive. This layout required a driveshaft to pass under the turret, which increased the overall height of the tank, a characteristic shared with German tanks of World War II that also used this layout. The large diameter of the radial engines in M4 tanks added to the hull height. These features accounted for the high silhouette and large side sponsons that were characteristic of
355-501: A much longer high-capacity chamber allowing it to penetrate up to 330mm of armor. This gave it a muzzle velocity of 3,750 ft/s (1,140 m/s) with the T30E16 APCR shot and could penetrate the Tiger's frontal armor beyond 3,300 yd (3,000 m). The model shown used single-piece 50-inch-long (1,300 mm) ammunition and was the only Super Pershing sent to Europe. Firing trials with
426-410: A nearby fire, the Pershing was in a disadvantageous position. A concealed Tiger tank fired three shots from about 100 yd (91 m). The first penetrated the turret through the machine gun port in the mantlet, killing both the gunner and the loader. The second shot hit the gun barrel, causing the round that was in the chamber to fire with the effect of distorting the barrel. The last shot glanced off
497-520: A penetration through the lower gun shield. On 6 March, just after the 3rd Armored Division had entered the city of Cologne , a famous tank duel took place. A Panther tank on the street in the front of Cologne Cathedral was lying in wait for enemy tanks. Two M4 Shermans were supporting infantry and came up on the same street as the Panther. They ended up stopping just before the Cathedral because of rubble in
568-521: A range of under 300 yd (270 m). There were two other tank engagements involving the T26E3, with one Tiger I knocked out during the fighting around Cologne, and one Panzer IV knocked out at Mannheim. The T26E3s with the 9th Armored Division saw action in fighting around the Roer River with one Pershing disabled by two hits from a German 150 mm field gun. A platoon of five M26s, less one that
639-484: A request for production of the T26E1. In January 1944, 250 T26E1s were authorized. General Barnes of Ordnance continued to press for production of 1,000 tanks. According to Forty, Ordnance recommended that 1,500 of the T26E1 be built. The Armored Force recommended only 500. The AGF rejected the 90 mm version of the tank and wanted it to be built with the 76 mm gun instead. Somehow, Ordnance managed to get production of
710-505: A shot to the belly. Irwin described this German tank as a Tiger, but Zaloga was skeptical of this claim. The tank was likely a Panzer IV. After the war, the single Super Pershing in Europe was last photographed in a vehicle dump in Kassel, Germany, and was most likely scrapped. In May 1945, as fierce fighting continued on the island of Okinawa , and M4 tank losses mounted, plans were made to ship
781-563: Is inadequate against the German Mark VI (Tiger) tank. General Devers pressed on with his advocacy for the T26, going over McNair's head to General George Marshall, and, on 16 December 1943, Marshall overruled McNair and authorized the production of 250 T26E1 tanks. Then, in late December 1943, Devers was transferred to the Mediterranean, where he eventually led the invasion of Southern France with
SECTION 10
#1733085198942852-670: The M24 Chaffee were operational under the U.S. Far East Command. In July 1950, when the M24 was revealed ineffective against North Korean tanks such as the T-34-85, the U.S. military hurriedly began to mobilize medium-sized tanks to deal with them. The Far East Command urgently maintained three M26 tanks, which were left unattended at the Tokyo ordnance depot, and organized into a provisional tank platoon, commanded by Lieutenant Samuel Fowler, and deployed them to
923-604: The T69 in its oscillating design and in that it held a crew of three and a nine-round drum autoloader under the gun. The T54E1 was abandoned in 1956 and in 1957 the entire project was cancelled in favor of the T95 Medium Tank . In December 1950, the Army Equipment Development Guide recommended that a 105 mm tank gun be pursued. By 6 July 1951, OTCM (Ordnance Technical Committee Minutes) 33842 officially initiated
994-535: The 1st Army, which split them between the 3rd and 9th Armored Divisions . A total of 310 T26E3 tanks were eventually sent to Europe before VE Day , with 200 being issued to the troops. The actual number that engaged in combat is unknown. In February 1945, Major General Gladeon M. Barnes , chief of the Research and Development Section of Army Ordnance, personally led a special team to the European Theater, called
1065-432: The 6th Army Group. In his absence, further attempts were made to derail the T26 program, but continued support from Generals Marshall and Eisenhower kept the production order alive. Testing and production of the T26E1 proceeded slowly, however, and the T26E1 did not begin full production until November 1944. These production models were designated as the T26E3. A single prototype of a T26 turret mounted on an M4(105) chassis
1136-537: The 76 mm gun, electrical transmission T23. Theater commanders generally favored a 76 mm gun medium tank such as the T23 and were against a heavy 90 mm gun tank. However, testing of the T23 at Fort Knox had demonstrated reliability problems in the electrical transmission of which most army commanders were unaware. The new 76 mm M1A1 gun approved for the M4 Sherman seemed to address concerns about firepower against
1207-850: The Army Secretary Department of the Navy Secretary Department of the Air Force Secretary Department of Homeland Security Secretary Service branches and heads Chief of Staff of the United States Army Commandant of the Marine Corps Chief of Naval Operations Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force Chief of Space Operations Commandant of
1278-4361: The Coast Guard Reserve components Reserves: A MC N AF CG National Guard : A AF Civilian auxiliaries Military Auxiliary Radio System Marine Corps Cyber Auxiliary Merchant Marine Civil Air Patrol Coast Guard Auxiliary Unified combatant command Africa Central European Indo-Pacific Northern Southern Space Cyber Special Operations Strategic Transportation Structure United States Code Title 10 Title 14 Title 32 Title 50 The Pentagon Installations Units: A MC N AF SF CG Logistics Media Unit mottoes Operations and history Budget Current deployments Conflicts Wars Civil affairs History A MC N AF SF CG Timeline Colonial World War II By ancestry African Americans Asian Americans Buddhist Americans Jewish Americans Muslim Americans Sikh Americans Hispanic Americans Civil War Air Force Coast Guard Marine Corps Navy Academy History centers Army Center of Military History Marine Corps History Division Naval History and Heritage Command Air Force Historical Research Agency War artists Army Art Program Air Force Art Program Personnel Training Service academies : A ( prep ) MC/N ( prep ) AF/SF ( prep ) CG Merchant Marine ROTC A MC/N AF/SF Officer candidate/training school: A MC N AF/SF Warrant officer : A MEPS ASVAB The Basic School (MC) Enlisted recruit training: A MC N AF/SF CG Other education Uniforms Uniforms : A MC N AF SF Awards & decorations : Inter-service A MC/N AF/SF CG Foreign International Devices Badges : Identification A MC N AF SF CG Ranks Officer: A MC N AF SF CG Warrant officers Enlisted: A MC N AF SF CG Other Oath: Enlistment Officer Creeds & Codes: Code of Conduct NCO A MC N AF CG Service numbers : A MC N AF CG Military Occupational Specialty / Rating / Air Force Specialty Code Pay Uniform Code of Military Justice Judge Advocate General's Corps Military Health System / Tricare Separation Veterans Affairs Conscription Chiefs of Chaplains : A MC N AF CG Equipment A ( Designations ) MC: vehicles weapons other N AF CG Land Individual weapons Crew-served weapons Vehicles ( active ) Sea All watercraft Ships: A N active future AF CG MSC Weapons: N Reactors Air Aircraft World War I active future Aircraft designation Helicopter arms Other WWII equipment Nuclear football Electronics ( designations ) Flags : A MC N AF SF CG Ensign Jack Guidons Food WMDs : Nuclear Biological Chemical [REDACTED] Category A MC N AF SF CG [REDACTED] Navboxes A MC N AF SF CG References [ edit ] ^ "Oshkosh Beats Lockheed, AM General For Historic JLTV Win" . Breaking Defense . Retrieved August 26, 2015 . Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_land_vehicles_of_the_United_States_Armed_Forces&oldid=1237317934 " Categories : Military vehicles of
1349-511: The German tanks. Although it could reliably penetrate the frontal armor of a Tiger 1 at standard ranges, all participants in the debate were, however, unaware of the inadequacy of the 76 mm gun against the frontal armor of the Panther tank , specifically its upper glacis (although its turret could still be penetrated at standard ranges), as they had not researched the effectiveness of this gun against
1420-519: The Korean Peninsula along with the M26 Pershing tank. The 70th Tank Battalion at Fort Knox Kentucky had pulled World War II memorial M26s off of pedestals and reconditioned them for use, but had to fill out two companies with M4A3s. The 72nd Tank Battalion at Fort Lewis Washington and the 73rd Tank Battalion at Fort Benning Georgia were fully equipped with M26s. The 89th Medium Tank Battalion
1491-449: The Korean Peninsula by the end of 1950, and 29 North Korean tanks were defeated by them during the same period. Although it had better anti-tank capability than the M4A3E8 thanks to its 90 mm gun, its underpowered engine which wasn't well suited to Korea's mountainous terrain, and its tendency to overheat quickly made it less liked among crews, and most were thus temporarily withdrawn in favor of
SECTION 20
#17330851989421562-490: The Korean Peninsula. However, while defending Jinju on 31 July, all of these tanks experienced engine overheating and became immobilized due to insufficient maintenance on belts and cooling fans, and eventually all of them were self-destructed. Around the same time, various tank battalions of the Army and a tank company from the 1st Marine Provisional Brigade, which were all fully organized armored training units, were dispatched to
1633-516: The Korean War (unlike World War II), was a closer match to the T-34-85 as both tanks could destroy each other at normal combat ranges. After November 1950, North Korean armor was rarely encountered. China entered the conflict in February 1951 with four regiments of tanks (a mix of mostly T-34-85 tanks, with a few IS-2 tanks, and some other AFVs). However, because these Chinese tanks were dispersed with
1704-592: The M26 Pershing tanks to that battle. On 31 May 1945, a shipment of 12 M26 Pershing tanks were dispatched to the Pacific for use in the Battle of Okinawa. Due to a variety of delays, the tanks were not completely offloaded on the beach at Naha, Okinawa until 4 August. By then, fighting on Okinawa had come to an end, and VJ Day followed on 2 September 1945. At the outbreak of the Korean War , only four tank companies equipped with
1775-447: The M4 Sherman. The T23 turret was used on all production versions of the 76 mm M4 Sherman as the original M4 75 mm turret was found to be too small to easily mount the 76 mm M1A1 gun. The first production 76 mm M4 with the T23 turret, the M4E6, was built in the summer of 1943. The T25 and T26 lines of tanks came into being in the midst of a heated internal debate within
1846-495: The M4 lineage. In the spring of 1942, as the M4 Sherman was entering production, U.S. Army Ordnance began work on a follow-up tank. The T20 tank reached a mock-up stage in May 1942, and was intended as an improved medium tank to follow the M4. An earlier heavy tank, the M6 , had been standardized in February 1942, but proved to be a failure. The U.S. Army had no doctrinal use for a heavy tank at
1917-504: The M4. Later prototypes of the M26 tested a torsion bar suspension , which became the standard for future U.S. tank suspension systems. The T22 series reverted to the M4 transmission because of problems with the early Torqmatic transmission used in the T20. The T22E1 tested an autoloader for the main gun and eliminated the loader's position with a small two-man turret. Through much of 1943, there
1988-485: The Super Pershing engaged and destroyed a German tank, or something resembling a tank, at a range of 1,500 yd (1,400 m). According to Zaloga, it is possible this vehicle was a Jagdpanther from the 507th Heavy Panzer Battalion. On 12 April, the Super Pershing claimed a German tank of unknown type. On 21 April, the Super Pershing was involved in a short-range tank duel with a German tank, which it knocked out with
2059-465: The T15E1 revealed that the length and weight of the single-piece ammunition made it difficult to stow inside the tank and load into the gun. A second pilot tank was converted from a T26E3 and used a modified T15E2 gun that had two-piece ammunition. Twenty-five production models of the tank, designated T26E4, were built. An improved mounting removed the need for stabilizer springs. Post-war, two M26 tanks had
2130-410: The T26 tank other than the conception of a tank versus tank duel—which is believed unsound and unnecessary. Both British and American battle experience has demonstrated that the antitank gun in suitable number and disposed properly is the master of the tank. Any attempt to armor and gun tanks so as to outmatch antitank guns is foredoomed to failure... There is no indication that the 76 mm antitank gun
2201-742: The T26E1 started in November 1944. Forty primarily quoted from a post-war report from the Ordnance Dept. Production finally began in November 1944. Ten T26E3 tanks were produced that month at the Fisher Tank Arsenal, 30 in December, 70 in January 1945, and 132 in February. The Detroit Tank Arsenal also started production in March 1945, and the combined output was 194 tanks for that month. Production continued through
T54 (American tank) - Misplaced Pages Continue
2272-490: The T26E3s were too large and heavy to cross the damaged bridge and had to wait five days before getting across the river by barge. Europe's bridges were in general not designed for heavy loads, which had been one of the original objections to sending a heavy tank to Europe. A single Super Pershing was shipped to Europe and given additional armor to the gun mantlet and front hull by the maintenance unit before being assigned to one of
2343-510: The T54 gun installed, which had the same long gun barrel, but the ammunition cartridge was designed to be shorter and fatter, while still retaining the propellant force of the original round. The tanks were designated as the M26E1 tank, but lack of funds cut off further production. In May 1946, due to changing conceptions of the U.S. Army's tank needs, the M26 was reclassified as a medium tank . Designed as
2414-490: The U.S. Army about its future tank needs. The accounts of what exactly happened during this time vary by historian, but all agree that Army Ground Forces was the main source of resistance that delayed production of the T26. In September–October 1943, a series of discussions occurred over the issue of beginning production of the T26E1, which was advocated by the head of the Armored Force, General Jacob Devers . Ordnance favored
2485-417: The U.S. Army from mid-1943 to early 1944 over the need for tanks with greater firepower and armor. A 90 mm gun mounted in a massive new turret was installed in both series. The T26 series were given additional frontal hull armor, with the glacis plate increased to 4 in (100 mm). This increased the weight of the T26 series to over 40 short tons (36 t) and decreased their mobility and durability as
2556-648: The U.S. Marine Tank Company destroyed three T-34-85s of the 109th Tank Regiment of the North Korean army in a few minutes during their first contact at Obong-ri, Changnyeong . Then, during the Battle of the Bowling Alley , M26s of the 73rd Tank Battalion, which supported the ROK 1st Infantry Division during the Battle of Tabu-dong , destroyed 13 T-34-85 tanks and five SU-76M self-propelled guns. A total of 309 M26 tanks were fielded on
2627-642: The United States Secretary of Defense Deputy Secretary of Defense Secretary of Homeland Security Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Joint Chiefs of Staff : Chairman Vice Chairman Committees on Armed Services Senate House Active duty four-star officers Active duty three-star officers United States military seniority National Security Act of 1947 Goldwater–Nichols Act Components Military departments Department of Defense Secretary Department of
2698-529: The United States United States military-related lists United States transportation-related lists Lists of military vehicles Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata M26 Pershing The M26 Pershing is a heavy tank , later designated as a medium tank , formerly used by the United States Army . It
2769-3197: The United States Army in Germany Tank classification List of "M" series military vehicles List of currently active United States military land vehicles List of crew served weapons of the US Armed Forces List of vehicles of the United States Marine Corps List of weapons of the U.S. Marine Corps G-numbers v t e American armored fighting vehicles of World War II Tanks Light M1 combat car M2 light tank M3 Stuart M22 Locust M24 Chaffee Marmon-Herrington CTLS Medium M2 medium tank M3 Lee M4 Sherman Heavy M26 Pershing Self-propelled artillery T19 howitzer motor carriage T30 howitzer motor carriage T34 rocket launcher M4 mortar carrier M3 gun motor carriage M7 howitzer motor carriage (Priest) M8 howitzer motor carriage (Scott) M12 gun motor carriage M21 mortar motor carriage M40 gun motor carriage M43 howitzer motor carriage Tank destroyers T48 gun motor carriage M3 gun motor carriage M6 gun motor carriage M10 3-inch gun motor carriage M18 gun motor carriage (Hellcat) M36 gun motor carriage Armored carriers M2 half-track car M3 half-track M5 half-track M9 half-track M39 armored utility vehicle Amphibious vehicles Landing Vehicle Tracked Armored cars M3 scout car M8 light armored car M20 armored utility car Self-propelled anti-aircraft guns M13/M14 multiple gun motor carriage M15 combination gun motor carriage M16/M17 multiple gun motor carriage M19 multiple gun motor carriage Experimental and short production run vehicles Tanks M6 heavy tank Light tank T7/medium tank M7 T14 heavy tank T20 medium tank T25 medium tank T28 super-heavy tank T29 heavy tank T30 heavy tank T32 heavy tank T34 heavy tank Self-propelled artillery T24/ T40/M9 tank destroyer T18 howitzer motor carriage T54/T59 gun motor carriage T55E1 motor carriage 8-inch howitzer motor carriage T84 T92/T93 gun motor carriage T88 gun motor carriage Armoured cars T17 Deerhound T18 Boarhound T27 armored car M38 Wolfhound S1 scout car Lend-Lease T16 universal carrier T17E1 Staghound American armored fighting vehicle production during World War II v t e United States Armed Forces Legend A = Army MC = Marine Corps N = Navy AF = Air Force SF = Space Force CG = Coast Guard Leadership President of
2840-524: The Zebra Mission. Its purpose was to support the T26E3 tanks, which still had teething problems, as well as to test other new weapons. In March, the T26E3 tanks were redesignated as the M26. The 3rd Armored first used the M26 to engage the enemy on 25 February near the Roer River . On 26 February, a T26E3 named Fireball was knocked out in an ambush at Elsdorf while overwatching a roadblock. Silhouetted by
2911-490: The battlefield today. There are indications that the enemy concurs in this view. Apparently, the M4 is an ideal combination of mobility, dependability, speed, protection, and firepower. Other than this particular request—which represents the British view—there has been no call from any theater for a 90 mm tank gun. There appears to be no fear on the part of our forces of the German Mark VI (Tiger) tank... There can be no basis for
T54 (American tank) - Misplaced Pages Continue
2982-406: The choice of a rear transmission and rear sprocket drive layout made it possible to lower the hull silhouette and eliminate the side sponsons. The T20 was fitted with the new 76 mm M1A1 gun , the 3-inch M7 was considered too heavy at about 1,990 lb (900 kg). New stronger steels were used to create a weapon weighing about 1,200 lb (540 kg). The 3 inch front hull armor
3053-627: The criteria of firepower, mobility, and protection, US historian R. P. Hunnicutt ranked the Pershing behind the German Tiger II heavy tank, but ahead of the Tiger I heavy and Panther medium tanks. It was withdrawn in 1951 in favor of its improved derivative, the M46 Patton , which had a more powerful and reliable engine and advanced suspension. The lineage of the M26 continued with the M47 Patton , and
3124-694: The deficiencies in the 75 mm-gunned M4 Shermans and tank destroyers in the American units. This deficiency motivated the military to ship the tanks to Europe, and on 22 December 1944, the T26E3 tanks were ordered to be deployed to Europe. Due to the repeated design and production delays, only 20 Pershing tanks were introduced into the European theater of operations before the Battle of the Bulge. This first shipment of Pershings arrived in Antwerp in January 1945. They were given to
3195-458: The development project with two new vehicles designated: the 105 mm gun tank T54, and the 105 mm gun tank T54E1. The T54's 105 mm T140 gun was a lighter version of the 105 mm T5E2, which was the armament of the T29 Heavy Tank . Designed for use with an autoloader, their breeches were inverted and fixed rounds were used. When modified for use with the T54E1 oscillating turret,
3266-472: The end of the war, and over 2,000 were produced by the end of 1945. The 90 mm M3 gun of the Pershing was similar to the German 88 mm KwK 36 used on the Tiger I. In an effort to match the firepower of the King Tiger's more powerful 88 mm KwK 43 , the T15E1 90 mm gun was developed and mounted in a T26E1 in January 1945. This tank was designated T26E1-1. The T15E1 gun was 73 calibers in length and had
3337-414: The engine and powertrain were not improved to compensate for the weight gain. The T26E3 was the production version of the T26E1 with a number of minor modifications made as the result of field testing. In February 1945, the T26 was fielded in the European Theater, where its performance received early praise from Army Ordnance officials. The Army named the tank after Army General John J. Pershing when it
3408-405: The first tanks in the U.S. Army with the 76 mm M1A1 gun to go into production. However, the T23 would have required that the army adopt an entirely separate line of training, repair, and maintenance, and so was rejected for combat operations. The primary legacy of the T23 would thus be its production cast turret, which was designed from the outset to be interchangeable with the turret ring of
3479-421: The gun shield and two on the side. The two side hits went completely through and out the other side. Four of the Panther's crew were able to successfully bail out of the stricken tank before it was destroyed. The action was recorded by a Signal Corps cameraman T/Sgt. Jim Bates. On the same day, another T26E3 was knocked out in the town of Niehl near Cologne, by a rarely-seen Nashorn 88 mm tank destroyer , at
3550-5994: The gun was designated as the 105 mm gun T140E2. List of land vehicles of the U.S. Armed Forces#Main Battle Tanks From Misplaced Pages, the 💕 (Redirected from List of land vehicles of the U.S. Armed Forces ) Land vehicles by type and current level of use. Light tanks [ edit ] Out of service [ edit ] M1917 M1 combat car Light tank M2 Light tank M3/M5 Light tank (airborne) M22 Light tank M24 M41/A1/A2/A3 Walker Bulldog M551/A1 Sheridan (armored reconnaissance airborne assault vehicle) T7 combat car Experimental (suspended/cancelled/completed) [ edit ] XM8 Armored Gun System T92 Medium tanks [ edit ] Out of service [ edit ] M2 medium tank Medium tank M3 Lee/Grant (all models) Medium tank M4 Sherman (all models) M46 Patton M47 Patton M48A1/A2/A3/A5 Patton M48A4 Experimental [ edit ] T20 medium tank T22 medium tank T23 medium tank Heavy tanks [ edit ] Out of service [ edit ] Heavy tank M26 Pershing Heavy tank M103 Experimental (Cancelled) [ edit ] Heavy tank T1/M6 Super-heavy tank T28 (T95 GMC) Main battle tanks [ edit ] In active service [ edit ] M1A1D/M1A2/M1A2 SEP Abrams M1A1HA Abrams Out of service [ edit ] M60A1/A3 TTS Patton Tank (including RISE and RISE Passive vehicles) M1/IPM1/M1A1 Abrams (M1A1 used for reserve training) Experimental (suspended/cancelled/completed) [ edit ] M60A1E1/E2/A2 XM1202 MCS MBT-70 Armored cars [ edit ] Out of service [ edit ] Jeffery armored car M1 armored car M3 scout car M8 Greyhound M38 Wolfhound T7 armored car XM706 (wheeled) XM706E1/M706 (wheeled) XM706E2 (wheeled) In service [ edit ] M1117 armored security vehicle MRAP Experimental (active) [ edit ] ULTRA AP Experimental (suspended/cancelled/completed) [ edit ] XM800 armored reconnaissance scout vehicle Armored personnel carriers, reconnaissance and fighting vehicles [ edit ] Out of service [ edit ] M2 half-track car M3 half-track M5 half-track M9 half-track M59 (APC) M75 (APC) M114/A1 (full-track) In active service [ edit ] M113 armored personnel carrier M2 Bradley ( infantry fighting vehicle ) Stryker interim armored (fighting) vehicle LAV-25 armored reconnaissance vehicle Landing vehicles, tracked [ edit ] LVT(1) (G-156) LVT(2) (G-167) LVT(A)(1) (G-214) (Armored with 37 mm gun) LVT(A)(2) (G-168) (Armored) LVT(A)(4) (Armored with 75 mm howitzer) LVT(A)(5) (Armored with 75 mm howitzer) LVTP5 LVTH6 (with 105 mm howitzer) LVTR1 (recovery vehicle) LVTE1 (engineer vehicle) LVTP7 (later AAV7 ) Dedicated anti-armor vehicles [ edit ] Out of service [ edit ] 75 mm Gun Motor Carriage M3 (T12) M6 Fargo M10 tank destroyer M18 Hellcat M36 (tank destroyer) T48 Gun Motor Carriage M901 Improved Tow Vehicle Specialist armored vehicles [ edit ] In active service [ edit ] M104 Wolverine (Armored Bridge Layer) M9 Armored Combat Earthmover M60A1 Armored Vehicle Launched Bridge (AVLB) M88 Recovery Vehicle M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle (CEV) M981 FISTV M93 Fox NBCRS (Nuclear Biological Chemical Reconnaissance System) Utility Vehicles [ edit ] Out of service [ edit ] FWD Model B Gama Goat GMC CCKW Jeffery Quad M29 Weasel M39 Truck M151 Mack AC Willys MB Willys M38 Ford GTB Dodge M37 M520 Goer M25 tank transporter Interim Fast Attack Vehicle In active service [ edit ] M939 Truck HMMWV FMTV MTVR L-ATV ( Oshkosh Defense's JLTV winner (August 2015); manufactured unarmoured; Long Term Armor Strategy (LTAS) complaint (A-kit/B-kit)) Experimental [ edit ] FMC XR311 (also known as GI Hotrod ) Self-propelled guns and artillery [ edit ] In active service [ edit ] M109A6/A7 Paladin (155 mm howitzer motor carriage; full-track) M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System High Mobility Artillery rocket system Out of service [ edit ] M109/A1/A2/A3/A4/A5 (155 mm howitzer motor carriage; Full-Track); (M109A5 used for reserve training) M108 (105 mm howitzer) M107 (175 mm howitzer) M110/A1/A2 (203 mm howitzer) 76 mm Gun Motor Carriage M10 (3"/76 mm gun motor carriage; full-track) 76 mm Gun Motor Carriage M18 Hellcat (76 mm gun motor carriage; full-track) 90 mm Gun Motor Carriage M36 Jackson (90 mm gun motor carriage; full-track) Landing Vehicle Tracked (armored) (LVT(A))1/2/4/5 (amphibious full-track) 81 mm mortar carrier M4/A1 M21 mortar motor carriage T19 howitzer motor carriage T30 howitzer motor carriage Experimental [ edit ] XM2001 Crusader self-propelled howitzer Mine-resistant ambush-protected ( MRAP ) [ edit ] M1117 Armored Security Vehicle Buffalo Caiman Cougar M-ATV (MRAP all-terrain vehicle) MaxxPro RG-31 RG-33 Specialized vehicles [ edit ] LSV (Light Strike Vehicle) ATV (MV700, MV850) Desert Patrol Vehicle (still in use in small numbers by Navy SEALs) See also [ edit ] Vehicle registration plates of
3621-559: The main cause of the delay in production of the M26 was opposition to the tank from the Army Ground Forces , headed by General Lesley McNair . Zaloga in particular has identified several specific factors that led both to the delay of the M26 program and limited improvements in the firepower of the M4: From mid-1943 to mid-1944, development of the 90 mm up-armored T26 prototype continued to proceed slowly due to disagreements within
SECTION 50
#17330851989423692-451: The more reliable "Easy Eight" Sherman. The M26 tank was then gradually replaced by or upgraded in standards to the new M46 tank in 1951 due to its chronic lack of mobility as the war evolved into battles between mountains. A 1954 survey concluded that there were in all 119, mostly small scale, tank vs. tank actions involving U.S. Army and Marine units during the Korean War, with 97 T-34-85 tanks knocked out and another 18 probables. The M4A3E8
3763-457: The new German tanks, which had already been encountered in combat. Gen. Lesley J. McNair had agreed to the production of the 76 mm M4 Sherman, and he strongly opposed the additional production of the T26E1. In the fall of 1943, he wrote this letter to Devers, responding to the latter's advocacy of the T26E1: The M4 tank, particularly the M4A3, has been widely hailed as the best tank on
3834-424: The original layout set down by the Pershing. Development of the M26 during World War II was prolonged by a number of factors, the most important being opposition to the tank from Army Ground Forces. However, the tank losses experienced in the Battle of the Bulge against a concentrated German tank force composed of some 400 Panther tanks, as well as Tiger II tanks and other German armored fighting vehicles, revealed
3905-598: The other street [where the Sherman had been destroyed]. However, as we entered the intersection, our driver had his periscope turned toward the Panther and saw their gun turning to meet us. When I turned our turret, I was looking into the Panther's gun tube; so instead of stopping to fire, our driver drove into the middle of the intersection so we wouldn't be a sitting target. As we were moving, I fired once. Then we stopped and I fired two more shells to make sure they wouldn't fire at our side. All three of our shells penetrated, one under
3976-417: The street and did not see the enemy Panther. The lead Sherman was knocked out, killing three of the five crew. A T26E3, nicknamed Eagle 7 , was in the next street over and was called over to engage the Panther. What happened next was described by the T26E3 gunner Cpl. Clarence Smoyer: We were told to just move into the intersection far enough to fire into the side of the enemy tank, which had its gun facing up
4047-417: The tank crews of the 3rd Armored Division. The new gun on the Super Pershing could pierce 13 inches (330 mm) of armor at 100 yards (91 m). The front hull was given two 38 mm steel boiler plates, bringing the front up to 38+38+102 mm of armor. The plates were applied at a greater slope than the underlying original hull plate. The turret had 80 mm thick rolled homogeneous armor (RHA) from
4118-575: The time. The T20 was designed to have a more compact hull than the M4. The Ford GAN V-8, a lower silhouette version of the GAA engine used in later variants of the M4, had become available. The engine had originally been an effort by Ford to produce a V-12 liquid-cooled aircraft engine patterned after the Rolls-Royce Merlin , but failed to earn any aircraft orders and so was adapted as a V-8 for use in tanks; use of this lower profile engine together with
4189-530: The turret side, taking off the upper cupola hatch. While backing up to escape, the Tiger became entangled in debris and was abandoned by the crew. Fireball was quickly repaired and returned to service on 7 March. Shortly afterwards, also at Elsdorf, another T26E3 knocked out a Tiger I and two Panzer IVs . The Tiger was knocked out at 900 yd (820 m) with the 90-mm HVAP T30E16 ammunition. Photographs of this knocked out Tiger I in Hunnicutt's book showed
4260-403: Was .5 in (13 mm) thicker than the 63 mm (2.5 in) front armor of the M4. The glacis plate slope was similar at 46°. The T20's overall weight was approximately the same as the M4. The T20 used an early version of the horizontal volute spring suspension (HVSS), another improvement compared to the less robust vertical volute spring suspension (VVSS) of the early versions of
4331-518: Was being serviced, played a key role in helping Combat Command B of the 9th Armored capture the Ludendorff Bridge during the Battle of Remagen on 7–8 March 1945, providing fire support to the infantry in order to take the bridgehead before the Germans could blow it up. In encounters with Tigers and Panthers, the M26 performed well. Some of the division's other tanks were able to cross the bridge, but
SECTION 60
#17330851989424402-414: Was built by Chrysler in the summer of 1944, but did not progress into production. Hunnicutt, researching Ordnance Department documents, asserts that Ordnance requested production of 500 each of the T23, T25E1, and T26E1 in October 1943. The AGF objected to the 90 mm gun of the tanks, whereas the Armored Force wanted the 90 mm gun mounted in a Sherman tank chassis. General Devers cabled from London
4473-557: Was constituted in Japan with three companies of reconditioned M4A3s and one of M26s from various bases in the Pacific; due to the shortage of M26s, most regimental tank companies had M4A3 Shermans instead. Two battalions detached from the 2nd Armored Division at Fort Hood Texas, the 6th Medium and 64th Heavy Tank Battalions, were fully equipped with M46 Patton tanks. The 1st Marine Division at Camp Pendleton California had all M4A3 howitzer tanks, which were replaced with M26s just days before boarding ships for Korea. On 17 August, one M26 of
4544-423: Was involved in 50% of the tank actions, the M26 in 32%, and the M46 in 10%. The M26/M46 proved to be an overmatch for the T-34-85 as its 90 mm HVAP round could – at point blank range – punch all the way through the T-34 from the front glacis armor to the back, whereas the T-34-85 had difficulty penetrating the armor of the M26 or M46. The M4A3E8, firing 76 mm HVAP rounds that were widely available during
4615-437: Was little perceived need within the U.S. Army for a better tank than the 75 mm M4 Sherman, and so, lacking any insights from the rest of the Army as to what was needed, the Ordnance Department then took a developmental detour into electrical transmissions with the T23 series. The electrical transmission was built by General Electric and had the engine driving a generator that powered two traction motors . The concept
4686-461: Was redesignated the M46 Patton and 1,160 M26s were rebuilt to this new standard. Thus, the M26 became a base of the Patton tank series, which replaced it in early 1950s. The M47 Patton was an M46 Patton with a new turret. The later M48 Patton and M60 , which the former saw service later in the Vietnam War and both saw combat in various conflicts in the Middle East and still serve in active duty in many nations today, were evolutionary redesigns of
4757-430: Was redesignated the M26 in March. After World War II, some 800 M26 tanks were upgraded with improved engines, transmissions, and the improved 90mm gun M3A1. These were designated as the M26E2 and later redesignated as M46 Patton . The M26 was introduced late into World War II and saw only a limited amount of combat. Tank historians, such as R. P. Hunnicutt, George Forty and Steven Zaloga , have generally agreed that
4828-542: Was reflected in the new designs of the later M48 Patton and M60 tank . The M26 was the culmination of a series of medium tank prototypes that began with the T20 in 1942, and it was a significant design departure from the previous line of U.S. Army tanks that had ended with the M4 Sherman . Several design features were tested in the prototypes. Some of these were experimental dead-ends, but many became permanent characteristics of subsequent U.S. Army tanks. This series of prototype vehicles began as medium tank project that
4899-450: Was similar to the drive system of the German "Porsche Tiger" . It had performance advantages in rough or hilly terrain, where the system could better handle the rapid changes in torque requirements. The electrical transmission T23 was championed by the Ordnance Department during this phase of development. After the initial prototypes were built in early 1943, an additional 250 T23 tanks were produced from January to December 1944. These were
4970-412: Was similar to, but more modern than the recently introduced M4 Sherman, and ended several years later as the U.S. Army's first operational heavy tank . The U.S. Army's first lineage of tanks evolved from the M1 Combat Car and progressed to the M2 Light Tank , M2 Medium Tank , M3 Lee , and finally the M4 Sherman . These tanks all had rear-mounted Continental air-cooled radial aircraft engines and
5041-416: Was used in the last months of World War II during the Invasion of Germany and extensively during the Korean War . The tank was named after General of the Armies John J. Pershing , who led the American Expeditionary Force in Europe in World War I . The M26 was intended as a replacement of the M4 Sherman , but a prolonged development period meant that only a small number saw combat in Europe. Based on
#941058