Stephen Moore (born February 16, 1960) is an American conservative writer and television commentator on economic issues. He co-founded and served as president of the Club for Growth from 1999 to 2004. Moore is a former member of the Wall Street Journal editorial board. He worked at The Heritage Foundation from 1983 to 1987 and again since 2014. Moore advised Herman Cain 's 2012 presidential campaign and Donald Trump 's 2016 presidential campaign.
66-1061: Stephen Moore may refer to: People [ edit ] Writers and actors [ edit ] Stephen Moore (writer) (born 1960), American economic writer Stephen Moore (actor) (1937–2019), English actor, voice of Marvin the Paranoid Android Stephen Campbell Moore (born 1979), English actor Politics [ edit ] Stephen Moore, 1st Viscount Mount Cashell (1696–1766), Anglo-Irish aristocrat and politician Stephen Moore, 1st Earl Mount Cashell (1730–1790), Anglo-Irish aristocrat and politician, his son Stephen Moore, 2nd Earl Mount Cashell (1770–1822), Anglo-Irish aristocrat and politician, his grandson Stephen Moore, 3rd Earl Mount Cashell (1792–1883), Anglo-Irish aristocrat, and politician, his great-grandson Stephen Moore, 4th Earl Mount Cashell (1825–1889) Stephen Moore (MP) (1836–1897), Irish politician Stephen Moore (Canadian politician) , candidate in
132-561: A Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and a Master of Arts (M.A.) in economics from George Mason University . From 1983 to 1987, Moore served as the Grover M. Hermann Fellow in Budgetary Affairs at The Heritage Foundation . In 1987, Moore was the research director of President Ronald Reagan 's Privatization Commission. Moore spent ten years as
198-509: A political action committee in the 2000, 2002, and 2004 election cycles "despite spending millions of dollars on federal campaign activity during the 2000, 2002, and 2004 election cycle." In 2007, the FEC and the Club for Growth agreed to settle the lawsuit, paying $ 350,000. Moore was involved with the consulting firms Arduin, Laffer & Moore Econometrics, and 32 Advisors. In May 2015, Moore co-founded
264-618: A "Distinguished Visiting Fellow." In 2017, Moore worked with Larry Kudlow on overhauling the US tax policy for the Trump administration, which was eventually passed into law by Congress. In 2017, he left Fox News Channel to join CNN as a senior economic analyst, leaving that position in early 2019. In July 2008, as the Fed had for months been rapidly cutting interest rates as the economy weakened into what became
330-545: A 2014 op-ed in the Washington Times, Moore cited the role of a "culture of virtue" in America's economic success, writing, "What is irrefutable is that marriage with a devoted husband and wife in the home is a far better social program than food stamps, Medicaid, public housing or even all of them combined." Moore has often expressed support for some variation of a gold standard. In 2015, he declared, "We have got to get rid of
396-526: A Nobel laureate or University of Chicago professor." The nomination stirred immediate criticism by economists, and was widely viewed as the most political appointment to the Federal Reserve Board since the 1980s. Benn Steil , director of international economics for the Council on Foreign Relations , stated he found the decision appalling. Monetary economist George Selgin stated he believed Moore
462-476: A Senate or a House seat without the support of the Club for Growth." From 2003 to 2004, the Club for Growth was the single largest fundraiser for Republican House and Senate candidates, being outdone only by the Republican party itself. In December 2004, the Club for Growth's board voted to remove Moore as president, with his opponents within the organization upset by his criticism of President George Bush and by
528-514: A definition of supply-side economics as the belief that adjustments in marginal tax rates have significant effects on the total supply. Gwartney and Stroup said "that the supply-side argument provided the foundation for the Reagan tax policy, which led to significant reductions in marginal tax rates in the United States during the 1980s". Barry P. Bosworth has provided another definition by presenting
594-535: A deposition before the court threatened to have him arrested and ordered him to sell his home to make the payments; the court revoked the order at Moore's request after he made a $ 217,000 payment. In January 2018, the IRS obtained a tax lien against Moore for $ 75,328 in unpaid federal taxes, interest, and penalties, alleging Moore had filed a "fraudulent" tax return in 2014. Moore contended that his accountant made an error in improperly deducting child support payments and that
660-400: A fall in investment and savings. At the same time, lower tax rates would cause the investment and savings levels to rise, while the consumption levels would fall. The second price influences decisions of individuals on the distribution of their time between work and leisure. The cost of individual's decision to allocate a unit of time either to work or leisure stands for current income, which
726-646: A fellow of the Cato Institute , a libertarian think tank . As senior economist of the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee under Chairman Dick Armey of Texas , Moore was said to be "instrumental in creating the FairTax proposal". In 1999, Moore co-founded and became president of the Club for Growth , a group advocating tax cuts and a reduction in government spending, along with supporting political candidates who favored free-market economic policies. While president of
SECTION 10
#1732905519585792-467: A global conspiracy to obtain money via research grants. In an April 2019 interview, Moore said that the Federal Reserve should not consider the economic impacts of climate change in decision-making. Moore wrote a 2014 Kansas City Star opinion piece entitled, "What's the matter with Paul Krugman ?," responding to Krugman's earlier opinion piece "Charlatans, Cranks and Kansas," which had discussed
858-400: A gradual and painless way to fight inflation by "producing our way out of it". Switching from earlier monetary policy, Federal Reserve chair Paul Volcker implemented tighter monetary policies including lower money supply growth to break the inflationary psychology and squeeze inflationary expectations out of the economic system . Therefore, supply-side supporters argue that Reaganomics
924-483: A great advocate for supply-side economics in politics and repeatedly praised his leadership. Critics of Reaganomics claim it failed to produce much of the exaggerated gains some supply-siders had promised. Paul Krugman later summarized the situation: "When Ronald Reagan was elected, the supply-siders got a chance to try out their ideas. Unfortunately, they failed." Although he credited supply-side economics for being more successful than monetarism which he claimed "left
990-445: A household phrase and promised an across-the-board reduction in income tax rates and an even larger reduction in capital gains tax rates. During Reagan's 1980 presidential campaign , the key economic concern was double digit inflation , which Reagan described as "[t]oo many dollars chasing too few goods", but rather than the usual dose of tight money, recession and layoffs, with their consequent loss of production and wealth, he promised
1056-743: A major instrument to affect aggregate production and GNP, while Monetarism focuses on management of monetary aggregates and credit. Unlike supply-side economics, demand-side economics is based on the assumption that increases in GNP result from increased spending. Traditional policy approaches were challenged by the theory of supply-side economics in the Reagan Administration of the 1980s. It claims that fiscal policy may lead to changes in supply as well as in demand. So, when marginal tax rates are high, consumers pursue additional leisure and current consumption instead of pursuing current income and extra income in
1122-585: A one-sentence letter expressing support for Moore's candidacy for the Federal Reserve Board. Signatories included Steve Forbes , Ed Feulner , and Bill Ford, the former President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta . Endorsements for Moore's nomination also came from his long-time collaborator Larry Kudlow , who recommended the appointment, and from Adam Brandon, president of the conservative advocacy group FreedomWorks . Moore's former employer, The Wall Street Journal editorial board, endorsed Moore for
1188-552: A recent major tax cut in Kansas. Moore said that job creation had been superior in low-taxation states during the five years ending June 2009 following the recession. After errors were found in Moore's data, he sought to correct the errors with different data that were also incorrect. Miriam Pepper, editorial page editor for the Star stated "I won't be running anything else from Stephen Moore." In
1254-521: A zero capital gains rate. Defunct Newspapers Journals TV channels Websites Other Economics Gun rights Identity politics Nativist Religion Watchdog groups Youth/student groups Miscellaneous Other In the United States, commentators frequently equate supply-side economics with Reaganomics . The administration of Republican president Ronald Reagan promoted its fiscal policies as being based on supply-side economics. Reagan made supply-side economics
1320-579: Is a macroeconomic theory postulating that economic growth can be most effectively fostered by lowering taxes , decreasing regulation , and allowing free trade . According to supply-side economics theory, consumers will benefit from greater supply of goods and services at lower prices, and employment will increase. Supply-side fiscal policies are designed to increase aggregate supply , as opposed to aggregate demand , thereby expanding output and employment while lowering prices. Such policies are of several general varieties: A basis of supply-side economics
1386-478: Is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Stephen Moore (writer) Moore advocates tax cuts and other supply-side policies . Moore's columns have appeared in outlets such as the Wall Street Journal , The Washington Times , The Weekly Standard and National Review . Along with Larry Kudlow , Moore advised the Trump administration during
SECTION 20
#17329055195851452-673: Is merely a secondary consequence. Early on, this idea had been summarized in Say's Law of Markets , which states: "A product is no sooner created, than it, from that instant, affords a market for other products to the full extent of its own value." or, in other words, production (supply) must first occur to enable economic activity or trade. Supply-side economics rose in popularity among Republican Party politicians from 1977 onwards. Prior to 1977, Republicans were more split on tax reduction, with some worrying that tax cuts would fuel inflation and exacerbate deficits. In 1978, Jude Wanniski published The Way
1518-581: Is the Laffer curve , a theoretical relationship between rates of taxation and government revenue . The Laffer curve suggests that when the tax level is too high, lowering tax rates will boost government revenue through higher economic growth , though the level at which rates are deemed "too high" is disputed. A 2012 poll of leading economists found none agreed that reducing the US federal income tax rate would result in higher annual tax revenue within five years. Critics also argue that several large tax cuts in
1584-466: The Wall Street Journal where he decried his critics, writing, "What did me in was not my economic ideas but gutter campaign tactics and personal assaults." Some Senate Republicans expressed relief that they would not have to cast a vote for or against him, because of his history of remarks deprecating women as well as a concern that he would not be independent of the White House. After his nomination
1650-549: The Great Recession , Moore stated, "I happen to believe we should be raising rates, not cutting them." Moore supports abolishing the income tax, and replacing it with a national sales tax. Moore rejects the scientific consensus on climate change . In 2009, he described climate change as "the biggest scam of the last two decades." In columns and op-eds , Moore called those with concerns about climate change "Stalinistic" and has accused climate scientists of being part of
1716-667: The Wall Street Journal which asserted that the Federal Reserve 's policies were slowing the economy and causing "wild swings in the stock market," at a time the Dow was up 13% for the year. He also asserted that the Fed should focus more on commodity price changes rather than overall price changes. Larry Kudlow , the Director of the U.S. National Economic Council , showed the article to President Trump, who decided he wanted to place Moore on
1782-779: The 2008 Canadian federal election Sport [ edit ] Stephen Moore (athlete) (born 1975), American decathlete Stephen Moore (cricketer) (born 1980), English cricketer Stephen Moore (judoka) (born 1969), American Paralympic judoka Stephen Moore (rugby union) (born 1983), Australian rugby footballer Other people [ edit ] Stephen Moore (fl. 1998), executive at One.Tel Stephen Moore, murdered in 2013 by his ex-wife Kathleen Dorsett Fictional characters [ edit ] Stephen Moore, character in 13Hrs See also [ edit ] Steve Moore (disambiguation) Steven Moore (disambiguation) Stevon Moore (born 1967), former American football player [REDACTED] Topics referred to by
1848-615: The Club for Growth, Moore founded the 501(c)(4) Free Enterprise Fund with other former Club for Growth members including Arthur Laffer and Mallory Factor. In 2005, Moore left the Free Enterprise Fund to serve on the editorial board of the Wall Street Journal . On September 19, 2005, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) filed suit against the Club For Growth, alleging that the group had failed to register as
1914-435: The Fed lowering rates to practically zero, and that was wrong." In April 2020, Moore referred to individuals who protested stay-at-home orders during the coronavirus pandemic as "the modern-day Rosa Parks — they are protesting against injustice and a loss of liberties." He ran a group named Save Our Country, which argued for the reopening of the economy amid the coronavirus pandemic. Moore argued against coronavirus relief in
1980-547: The Fed on March 28, 2019. In an appearance on Fox Business Network , political commentator Charlie Gasparino described Steve Moore as "the counterweight to [Chair of the Federal Reserve Jerome] Powell’s hawkishness." Journalist Fred Barnes defended Moore as "a disrupter, like Trump." In April 2019, CNN and The New York Times reported on several articles Moore had written in the National Review in
2046-508: The Federal Reserve Board. Moore called for higher interest rates when the economy was recovering from the Great Recession under Barack Obama, but has called for lower rates when the economy has fully recovered and continues to grow under Donald Trump. Moore stated in August 2018, "I have to confess: I was wrong about inflation in 2009 and 2010. I thought there would be a lot of inflation with
Stephen Moore - Misplaced Pages Continue
2112-451: The Federal Reserve and move towards a gold standard in this country!" Few economists support a gold standard. During a 2016 debate on the minimum wage, Moore stated, "I'm a radical on this. I'd get rid of a lot of these child labor laws. I want people starting to work at 11, 12." Moore asserted in a December 2018 appearance on CNN that the Federal Reserve was causing deflation in the economy, although Commerce Department data showed there
2178-851: The Treasury Alexander Hamilton . Bartlett stated in 2007 that Today, hardly any economist believes what the Keynesians believed in the 1970s and most accept the basic ideas of supply-side economics – that incentives matter, that high tax rates are bad for growth, and that inflation is fundamentally a monetary phenomenon. Consequently, there is no longer any meaningful difference between supply-side economics and mainstream economics. ... Today, supply-side economics has become associated with an obsession for cutting taxes under any and all circumstances. No longer do its advocates in Congress and elsewhere confine themselves to cutting marginal tax rates –
2244-448: The United States over the last 40 years have not increased revenue. The term "supply-side economics" was thought for some time to have been coined by the journalist Jude Wanniski in 1975; according to Robert D. Atkinson , the term "supply side" was first used in 1976 by Herbert Stein (a former economic adviser to President Richard Nixon ) and only later that year was this term repeated by Jude Wanniski. The term alludes to ideas of
2310-499: The World Works in which he laid out the central thesis of supply-side economics and detailed the failure of high tax rate progressive income tax systems and United States monetary policy under Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter in the 1970s. Wanniski advocated lower tax rates and a return to some kind of gold standard , similar to the 1944–1971 Bretton Woods System that Nixon abandoned. James D. Gwartney and Richard L. Stroup provide
2376-482: The advocacy group Committee to Unleash Prosperity with Laffer, Larry Kudlow , and Steve Forbes . Moore advised Herman Cain , a former presidential candidate and business executive, on his 9-9-9 Tax Plan for his 2012 presidential campaign . In 2014, The Heritage Foundation announced that Moore would rejoin the think tank as chief economist. Since March 2015 his profile on the Heritage website has described him as
2442-466: The amount of retained and taxed income is determined by the marginal tax rate. That is why, from a supply-side economist's standpoint, marginal tax rates play a significant role in determining the development of the economy. Due to crucial role in determining how much time workers will spend on work and leisure or how much income will be spent on consumption and for savings, supply-side economists insist on decreasing tax rates as they believe it could improve
2508-459: The decrease in tax revenues even if the tax rates are high. Due to the effect exerted by taxes on the taxed income, the adjustment of tax rates may not lead to proportional changes in tax revenues. That is why, some supply-side economists insist decreasing high tax rates can result in an increase of tax revenues. The Laffer curve embodies a postulate of supply-side economics: that tax rates and tax revenues are distinct, with government tax revenues
2574-407: The distribution of their income between consumption and savings. The cost of individual's decision to assign a unit of income to either consumption or savings is a future value of the unit, which has been given up by choosing either to consume or to save. The unit of income value is defined by the marginal tax rates. Therefore, higher tax rates would decrease the cost of consumption, which would cause
2640-421: The early 2000s that disparaged women, which Moore dismissed as spoofs or jokes. The Times reported, "Congressional Republicans say [Moore's views on interest rates and the gold standard] are less likely to impede Mr. Moore’s confirmation prospects than concerns over his personal life and past statements." Moore's call on the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates was also controversial. Lowering interest rates
2706-560: The economists Robert Mundell and Arthur Laffer . Supply-side economics developed in response to the stagflation of the 1970s . It drew on a range of non- Keynesian economic thought , including the Chicago School and New Classical School . Bruce Bartlett , an advocate of supply-side economics, traced the school of thought's intellectual descent from the philosophers Ibn Khaldun and David Hume , satirist Jonathan Swift , political economist Adam Smith and United States Secretary of
Stephen Moore - Misplaced Pages Continue
2772-528: The economy in ruins", he stated that supply-side economics produced results which fell "so far short of what it promised", describing the supply-side theory as "free lunches". Clinton signed the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 into law, which raised income taxes rates on incomes above $ 115,000, created additional higher tax brackets for corporate income over $ 335,000, removed the cap on Medicare taxes, raised fuel taxes and increased
2838-466: The fiscal year ended September 2018 were down 31% from the prior fiscal year, the largest decline since records began in 1934, except for during the Great Recession when corporate profits, and hence corporate tax receipts, plummeted. In February 2019, Moore stated, "There's no bigger swamp in Washington than the Federal Reserve Board. It's filled with hundreds of economists who are worthless, who have
2904-668: The form of unemployment benefits, arguing that "giving people money" was not an economic stimulus . Moore said, if it were true that it was the stimulus, "we could just give everybody $ 100,000 and we'd all be rich right? It’s just so stupid." In 2023, Moore co-authored the chapter on the Department of the Treasury in the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 book, Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise. On March 22, 2019, Trump announced he would nominate Moore to fill one of
2970-514: The future. Therefore, there is a decline in work effort and investment, which in turn causes a decrease of production and GNP, regardless of the total demand levels. On these assumptions, supply side economists formulate the idea that a cut in marginal tax rates has a positive effect on economic growth. The main focus of supply-side economics is promotion of economic growth. In this regard, some studies have suggested to consider two relative prices. The first one influences decisions of individuals on
3036-546: The group, Moore targeted " Republicans in Name Only " whom he viewed as not aligned with his anti-tax views; he criticized Republican Senators who did not readily embrace tax cuts, including Arlen Specter , Olympia Snowe , and George Voinovich . At the Club for Growth, Moore sought to change the Republican Party, saying in 2003, "We want to take over the party's fundraising. We want it to be, in 10 years, that no one can win
3102-469: The growth rates of the economy. Laffer curve illustrates a mathematical relationship between tax revenues and tax rates, which was popularized by economist Arthur B. Laffer in 1974. The Laffer Curve posits the existence of a maximum point when tax revenue is maximized at a specific (unknown) tax rate. Many interpret the Laffer Curve as higher tax rates can sometimes decrease the tax base, which will lead to
3168-463: The lien was the result of an IRS miscalculation, though Moore claims to have paid the lien and Montgomery County, Maryland Circuit Court records show the case is closed. In addition to the child support payments, the IRS also disallowed other deductions Moore had claimed. Moore has three sons and, as of 2019, is married to Anne Carey. Supply-side economics Heterodox Supply-side economics
3234-405: The narrow defeat of Senator Pat Toomey , who had the group's support. After Moore's departure, lawyers for the group sent letters to him and members of his new organization, the Free Enterprise Fund, threatening legal action for allegedly stealing the group's mailing list to raise funds for his new organization; Moore's partner Mallory Factor stated the list was acquired elsewhere. After he left
3300-503: The nomination. Democrats also criticized Moore over an unpaid $ 75,000 tax lien entered against him. Though some key Republican senators expressed support for Moore's nomination, including members of the Senate Banking Committee , enough Republican senators voiced concerns about Moore to place his confirmation in jeopardy. Republican senator Richard Shelby said, "I've always said they could use diversity, you don’t need to be
3366-438: The portion of Social Security income subject to tax, among other tax increases. Frankel and Orszag described the "progressive fiscal conservatism" of the 1993 package: "Such progressive fiscal conservatism combines modest attempts at redistribution (the progressive component) and budget discipline (the fiscal conservative component). Thus the 1993 package included significant spending reductions and tax increases. But it concentrated
SECTION 50
#17329055195853432-547: The same at a 100% tax rate as they are at a 0% tax rate and maximum revenue somewhere in between these two values. Supply-siders argued that in a high tax rate environment lowering tax rates would result in either increased revenues or smaller revenue losses than one would expect relying on only static estimates of the previous tax base. This led supply-siders to advocate large reductions in marginal income and capital gains tax rates to encourage greater investment, which would produce more supply. Jude Wanniski and many others advocate
3498-407: The same term This disambiguation page lists articles about people with the same name. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Moore&oldid=1258581862 " Category : Human name disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description
3564-460: The supply-side economics from two perspectives: Supply-side economics has originated as an alternative to Keynesian economics, which focused macroeconomic policy on management of final demand. Demand-side economics relies on a fixed-price view of the economy, where the demand plays a key role in defining the future supply growth, which also allows for incentive implications of investment. The Keynesian policy approaches focus on demand management as
3630-573: The tax increases on upper-income taxpayers, while substantially expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, Head Start, and other government programs aimed at lower earners." The tax increases led to greater revenue (relative to a baseline without a tax increase). The bill was strongly opposed by Republicans, vigorously attacked by John Kasich and Minority Whip Newt Gingrich as destined to cause job losses and lower revenue. Economist Paul Krugman wrote in 2017 that Clinton's tax increases on
3696-572: The tax on each additional dollar earned – as the original supply-siders did. Rather, they support even the most gimmicky, economically dubious tax cuts with the same intensity. ... today it is common to hear tax cutters claim, implausibly, that all tax cuts raise revenue. Current day advocates of supply-side economic policies claim that lower tax rates produce macroeconomic benefits and emphasize this benefit rather than their traditional ideological Classical liberals opposition to taxation because they opposed government in general. Their traditional claim
3762-491: The two vacant seats at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors . After the nomination was announced, Moore stated "I’m kind of new to this game, frankly, so I’m going to be on a steep learning curve myself about how the Fed operates, how the Federal Reserve makes it decisions, and this is a real, exciting opportunity for me." Democratic Senators denounced Moore as unqualified for the post, and called upon Trump to drop
3828-679: The writing and passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act . On March 15, 2019, President Donald Trump announced that Moore would be nominated to serve as a governor of the Federal Reserve . On May 2, 2019, Moore withdrew his name from consideration amid bipartisan resistance in the Senate. Moore grew up in New Trier Township, Illinois . He attended Saints Faith Hope & Charity School in Winnetka and graduated from New Trier High School in 1978. He received
3894-401: The wrong model in their mind. They should all be, they should all be fired and they should be replaced by good economists." Before his nomination to the Federal Reserve Board, in late December 2018 Moore stated, while on a radio talk show, that he believed "the people on the Federal Reserve Board should be thrown out for economic malpractice". On March 13, 2019, Moore co-authored a column in
3960-433: Was consistent inflation. In April 2019, Moore asserted deflation was "the whole reason the economy was so poor in late 2018," although inflation was 2.2% in the fourth quarter of 2018. In September 2018, Moore wrote a Wall Street Journal opinion piece entitled, "The Corporate Tax Cut Is Paying for Itself," in which he asserted that "faster-than-expected growth has produced a revenue windfall." Corporate tax receipts for
4026-427: Was given up by choosing either work or leisure. The cost also includes the future income, which was given up for leisure instead of enhancing the professional skills. The value of lost income is defined by the tax rate assigned to the additional income. Therefore, the increase in marginal tax rates leads to a decrease in the price of leisure. However, if the marginal tax rate decline, the cost of leisure increases. Both
SECTION 60
#17329055195854092-457: Was only partially based on supply-side economics. Congress under Reagan passed a plan that would slash taxes by $ 749 billion over five years. Critics claim that the tax cuts increased budget deficits while Reagan supporters credit them with helping the 1980s economic expansion and argued that the budget deficit would have decreased if not for massive increases in military spending. As a result, Jason Hymowitz cited Reagan—along with Jack Kemp —as
4158-609: Was supported by Trump but opposed by Fed chairman Powell and other policymakers at the time. The Federal Reserve later lowered rates by a quarter of a percent in September 2019 and again the next month. Moore reacted by calling it "an example of where I was right, and where my critics were wrong." On May 2, 2019, Moore withdrew his name from consideration, saying "The unrelenting attacks on my character have become untenable for me and my family and 3 more months of this would be too hard on us." Following his withdrawal, Moore penned an op-ed in
4224-463: Was that each man had a right to himself and his property and therefore taxation was immoral and of questionable legal grounding. On the other hand, supply-side economists argued that the alleged collective benefit (i.e. increased economic output and efficiency) provided the main impetus for tax cuts. As in classical economics , supply-side economics proposed that production or supply is the key to economic prosperity and that consumption or demand
4290-598: Was unfit to serve on the Board. Economist Justin Wolfers called the selection of Moore "the first genuinely bad Trump pick for the Fed" and called on the Senate not to confirm Moore. Harvard economics professor Greg Mankiw said that Moore "does not have the intellectual gravitas" for the position. Economist Menzie Chinn noted that Moore has not authored or co-authored any peer-reviewed journal articles. In April 2019, 105 professors, former government officials, and analysts signed
4356-611: Was withdrawn, Moore returned to his previous positions with FreedomWorks, The Heritage Foundation, and Committee to Unleash Prosperity. Additionally, Moore became chief economic officer of Frax, a cryptocurrency company that branded itself "the world’s decentralized central bank." Moore was married to Allison Moore until 2011. In 2012, a Virginia court held Moore in contempt of court for failing to pay his ex-wife $ 300,000 in spousal support, child support, and other obligations in his divorce settlement. Moore did not respond to repeated court requests to make payments and failed to appear for
#584415