190-547: Somerset v Stewart (1772) 98 ER 499 (also known as Sommersett v Steuart , Somersett's case , and the Mansfield Judgment ) is a judgment of the English Court of King's Bench in 1772, relating to the right of an enslaved person on English soil not to be forcibly removed from the country and sent to Jamaica for sale. According to one reported version of the case, Lord Mansfield decided that: The state of slavery
380-410: A writ would have to be issued, with different writs depending on the issue. If A wished to sue B for trespass, debt and detinue , the court would have to issue an individual writ for each action, with associated time delays and costs for A, and then ensure that B appeared in court. Bills, on the other hand, were traditionally used against court officials and the court's prisoners; as such, the defendant
570-663: A Protestant mob because of his judgments in support of rights for Catholics . In the Thames Ditton case , Lord Mansfield appeared to seek to limit the influence of the Somerset case. Lord Mansfield freed Somerset by his ruling and did so in the face of the 1729 opinion of the Attorney-General and Solicitor-General, men whom Mansfield in the Somerset case described as "two of the greatest men of their own or any times". The prominence of
760-460: A barrister. Murray married Lady Elizabeth Finch, youngest daughter of Daniel Finch, 2nd Earl of Nottingham and 7th Earl of Winchilsea and Anne Hatton. They had no children of their own, but took care of their great niece, Lady Elizabeth Murray (born 1760), the daughter of Mansfield's nephew and heir, David Murray, 7th Viscount Stormont , after her mother died. When Mansfield's other nephew, Sir John Lindsay , returned to Britain in 1765 following
950-537: A bill of arrest on its own. This became known as the Bill of Middlesex , and undermined the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas, which would normally deal with such civil cases. The advantages to this method were that bills were substantially cheaper, and unlike writs did not tie the plaintiff down. Once the case came to court the bill could be amended to include any action or actions the plaintiff wanted to enforce. By avoiding
1140-543: A career as a barrister was best for Murray. The Scottish Bar at the time was overcrowded, which made it difficult for a young barrister to build a reputation, yet qualifying for the English Bar was extremely expensive. Thanks to the patronage of Thomas Foley, 1st Baron Foley , who gave Murray £200 a year to live on, Murray could afford to study at the bar, and he became a member of Lincoln's Inn on 23 April 1724. After George I died on 11 June 1727, Murray entered and won
1330-661: A chance to reform the law relating to the assumption of good faith. Carter was the Governor of Fort Marlborough (now Bengkulu ), which was built by the British East India Company in Sumatra , Indonesia . He took out an insurance policy with Boehm against the fort's being taken by a foreign enemy. A witness called Captain Tryon testified that Carter knew the fort was built to resist attacks from natives but not European enemies, and
1520-425: A companion who would later be her personal attendant. Mansfield also helped mentor his nephew and heir, David Murray, 7th Viscount Stormont . Later, his nieces and unmarried sisters of Lord Stormont, Lady Anne and Lady Marjory Murray, would come to live at Kenwood to care for Lord and Lady Mansfield in their old age. Murray's first contact when he moved to London was William Hamilton, a Scottish-born barrister who
1710-501: A competition to write a Latin poem titled "The Death of the King". His actions were seen as a show of support for the House of Hanover and the political status quo , something odd considering the strong Jacobite sympathies of his family. He probably did this because, having no private income, he wished to secure patronage to help him advance politically. Another entrant was William Pitt , who
1900-422: A criminal court. This was factually incorrect; no indictment was tried by the King's Bench until January 1323, and no record of the court ordering the death penalty is found until halfway through Edward II 's reign. The court did have some criminal jurisdiction, with a royal ordinance in 1293 directing conspiracy cases to be brought to the King's Bench and the court's judges acting in trailbaston commissions around
2090-405: A day, and if not all barristers had been heard by the end of the day, they could continue where they left off the next morning. At the time it was also traditional for all judgments to be reserved . Although in a small number of cases this was useful, in the majority of cases it simply made coming to court more expensive and wasted time. As soon as Mansfield became Lord Chief Justice, he changed
SECTION 10
#17330846935322280-579: A definitive judgment about the legality of slavery in England, it nonetheless challenged the assumptions that enslaved people were no more than property and that "Britishness" and whiteness were inseparable categories. The precedent established by Somerset's case was seen to have wider implications. In The Slave Grace in 1827, Lord Stowell upheld the decision of the Vice-Admiralty Court in Antigua, whereby
2470-659: A diamond, which is still in the possession of his family. Murray's reputation continued to grow; in 1738, he was involved in 11 of the 16 cases heard in the House of Lords, and in 1739 and 1740 he acted as legal counsel in 30 cases there. On 20 September 1738, he married Lady Elizabeth Finch, the daughter of Daniel Finch, 2nd Earl of Nottingham, 7th Earl of Winchilsea and Anne Hatton , at Raby Castle , home of her sister Duchess of Cleveland in Durham . Her other sisters included Duchess of Somerset , Duchess of Roxburghe , and Lady Mary who
2660-538: A farm'), who were not emancipated either by becoming Christian or by entry into England, that possession of them could be recovered by the legal action of trover and that their master might lawfully compel them to leave England with him. The claim of 1749 relied on the opinion of 1729, which quoted no precedents and gave no reasoning. There were other freedom suits with different rulings before 1772, notably Shanley v Harvey (1763) and R v Stapylton (1771, also before Lord Mansfield). While Mansfield's judgment avoided making
2850-410: A fully independent tribunal, considering it part of the law reform which took place from 1232 to 1234. Under Edward I , the presence of the King in the court became more and more irregular, and by 1318 the court sat independent of the monarch. Its last travels around the country were in 1414 to Leicestershire , Staffordshire and Shropshire , and a visit to Northamptonshire in 1421. From then onwards,
3040-400: A letter attacking the King, and incensed at this, the government ordered several people to be arrested and tried for seditious libel, including Woodfall for publishing the letters, John Almon for selling them, and John Miller for republishing them. Almon's case was heard at Westminster Hall by Mansfield and a jury on 2 June 1770. He was found guilty, although it is unclear in what fashion he
3230-403: A nature, that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or political; but only positive law , which preserves its force long after the reasons, occasion, and time itself from whence it was created, is erased from memory: it's so odious, that nothing can be suffered to support it, but positive law. Whatever inconveniences, therefore, may follow from a decision, I cannot say this case
3420-400: A notion prevailed, that if a slave came into England, or became a Christian, he thereby became emancipated; but there was no foundation in law for such a notion; that when he and Lord Talbot were Attorney and Solicitor General, this notion of a slave becoming free by being baptized prevailed so strongly, that the planters industriously prevented their becoming Christians; upon which their opinion
3610-489: A peerage. This was seen as an excellent result by Murray, who had no interest in politics except as a stepping stone to become a member of the judiciary. Murray was not suited to politics, as he was far too calculating and independent of thought to accept any one party's doctrine. His Scottish and Jacobite roots also allowed for endless insinuation and controversy—in 1753 he was accused by the Bishop of Gloucester of "having drunk
3800-527: A printer for printing these letters, leaving Junius free to continue publishing them. On 14 November 1770, a letter by Junius directed at Mansfield was published by the Public Advertiser and the London Evening Post , a newspaper run by John Miller. In it, Junius attacked Mansfield, first for being Scottish, then for being a lapsed Jacobite , and finally for attempting to suppress the freedom of
3990-511: A result, some individuals in pro-slavery and anti-slavery colonies, for opposite reasons, desired a distinct break from English law in order to achieve their goals with regard to slavery. Beginning during the Revolutionary War , Northern states began to abolish or rule against maintaining slavery. Vermont was the first in 1777, followed by Pennsylvania (1780), Massachusetts (1783) and Connecticut (1784). In Massachusetts, rulings related to
SECTION 20
#17330846935324180-617: A slave by one Captain Howe. After Captain Howe died, Charlotte sought poor relief from the Parish of Thames Ditton. Mansfield stated that the Somersett case had determined only that a master could not force a slave to leave England, much as in earlier times a master could not forcibly remove his villein. He ruled that Charlotte was not entitled to relief under Poor Laws because relief was dependent on having been "hired" and this did not relate to slaves. In
4370-526: A slave who had returned to the colonies, after having resided in England for a year where she was free and no authority could be exercised over her, by her voluntary return had to submit to the authority over her resulting from the slavery law of Antigua. Lord Stowell criticised Lord Mansfield's judgment in the Somerset case , describing it as having reversed the judgment of Lord Hardwicke and establishing that "the owners of slaves had no authority or control over them in England, nor any power of sending them back to
4560-416: A slave". Legal academics have argued for years over what legal precedent was set in the case. Differences in reports of the judgment make it hard to determine how far Lord Mansfield went in acknowledging the principles behind his deliberately narrow ruling. The passage of the judgment in the standard collections of law reports does not appear to refer to the removal of slaves by force from the country, whereas
4750-774: A slave-ship – an event now known as the Zong massacre . Mansfield, in summing up the jury's verdict, said "The Case of Slaves was the same as if Horses had been thrown over board", and endeavoured to uphold the notion that slaves were property which could be destroyed in situations of "absolute necessity". But, new information was introduced in the case, and he ruled against the owners of the ship. In doing this, he achieved his aim of preventing maritime insurance law from becoming more complicated. Mansfield made another notable judgment in Millar v Taylor (1769) 4 Burr 2303, 98 ER 201 (20 April 1769), in relation to copyright law. Andrew Millar
4940-460: A trespass writ would be obtained and then quietly dismissed when B was detained in custody. This was originally undertaken through getting a writ of trespass from the Chancery, but eventually a shorter workaround was used; since the King's Bench retained criminal jurisdiction over Middlesex, the trespass (which was fictitious anyway) would be said to have occurred there, allowing the King's Bench to issue
5130-421: A villein engrossed in any Court of Record, he knew of no way by which he could be entitled to his freedom without the consent of his master. We feel the force of the inconveniences and consequences that will follow the decision of this question. Yet all of us are so clearly of one opinion upon the only question before us, that we think we ought to give judgment, without adjourning the matter to be argued before all
5320-532: A watershed in the abolition of slavery. It is an example in English law of the maxim he quoted as a warning to the parties in the case before he began his months of deliberation, " Let justice be done though the heavens fall ". The Somerset case became a significant part of the common law of slavery in the English-speaking world, and helped launch a new wave of abolitionism . Lord Mansfield's ruling contributed to
5510-481: A writ of habeas corpus . Captain Knowles on 9 December produced Somerset before the Court of King's Bench, which had to determine whether his imprisonment was lawful. The Chief Justice of the King's Bench, Lord Mansfield , ordered a hearing for 21 January; in the meantime he set the prisoner free on recognisance . Somerset's counsel's request to prepare arguments was granted, and so it was not until 7 February 1772 that
5700-482: A writ of debt in the Common Pleas, a problematic and archaic process. By 1558 the lawyers had succeeded in creating another method, enforced by the Court of King's Bench, through the action of assumpsit , which was technically for deceit. The legal fiction used was that by failing to pay after promising to do so, a defendant had committed deceit, and was liable to the plaintiff. The conservative Common Pleas, through
5890-475: A year, and a pension, and finally attempted to blackmail him by saying that if he accepted the office of Lord Chief Justice, the government would refuse to grant him a peerage . It was customary for all Lord Chief Justices to be given a peerage, and Murray responded by saying that in that situation he would refuse to become either Lord Chief Justice or Attorney General. Newcastle gave in, and promised to allow him to become Lord Chief Justice and to recommend him for
Somerset v Stewart - Misplaced Pages Continue
6080-533: A young lawyer who made his reputation with this, his first case; James Mansfield ; Serjeant-at-law William Davy ; Serjeant-at-law John Glynn ; John Alleyne; and the noted Irish lawyer and orator John Philpot Curran , whose lines in defence of Somerset were often quoted by American abolitionists , such as Frederick Douglass and Harriet Beecher Stowe in Uncle Tom's Cabin , chapter 37. Somerset's advocates argued that while colonial laws might permit slavery, neither
6270-496: Is allowed or approved by the law of England; and therefore the black must be discharged. This was not an end to slavery, as this only confirmed it was illegal to transport a slave out of England and Wales against his or her will. Slavery also persisted in the rest of the British Empire . As a result of the reporting of Mansfield's decision, public opinion and some newspapers gave the impression that slavery had been abolished by
6460-403: Is allowed or approved by the law of England; and therefore the black must be discharged. Slavery had never been authorised by statute ("positive law") within England and Wales, and Lord Mansfield found it also to be unsupported within England by the common law , although he made no comment on the position in the overseas territories of the British Empire . The case was closely followed throughout
6650-436: Is entailed on their posterity! Mansfield is often misquoted as declaring that "this air is too pure for a slave to breathe in" but no such words appear in the judgment. Rather, these words are part of the peroration of William Davy, Serjeant-at-Law for Somerset, who previously had cited a report of a 1569 case, in the reign of Elizabeth I , in which "one Cartwright brought a slave from Russia and would scourge him; for which he
6840-468: Is frequently mentioned in modern legal settings as the originator of "Lord Mansfield's Rule", in his own words: "...the law of England is clear, that the declarations of a father or mother, cannot be admitted to bastardize the issue born after marriage." This quote comes from Mansfield's appellate decision in Goodright v Moss (1777) 2 Cowp 591, 98 ER 1257 at 592. The primary legal question in
7030-468: Is no statute recognising slavery which operates in that part of the British empire in which we are now called upon to administer justice." He described the Somerset case as entitling a slave in England to discharge (from that status) and rendering any person attempting to force him back into slavery as guilty of trespass but not all reports of the case agree. Whatever the technical legal ratio decidendi of
7220-420: Is of such a nature that it is incapable of being introduced on any reasons, moral or political, but only by positive law , which preserves its force long after the reasons, occasions, and time itself from whence it was created, is erased from memory. It is so odious, that nothing can be suffered to support it, but positive law. Whatever inconveniences, therefore, may follow from the decision, I cannot say this case
7410-407: Is void. But, Mansfield argued in his judgment that it should only be treated as evidence of a contract, not as a vital element. Mansfield failed to make clear that he was referring only to consideration in commercial contracts, not general contracts, and as a result his judgment read that consideration was not required for any contract. His judgment has been much criticised by legal academics, and
7600-489: The Court of Chancery and equitable doctrines as one of the two principal common law courts along with the Common Pleas. To recover, the King's Bench undertook a scheme of revolutionary reform, creating less expensive, faster and more versatile types of pleading in the form of bills as opposed to the more traditional writs . Although not immediately stemming the tide, it helped the King's Bench to recover and increase its workload in
7790-560: The Court of Common Pleas , which was described as the "sleepy hollow". In the eighteenth century, English merchant law was still based on the Lex mercatoria , a medieval series of customs and principles used to regulate trading. Other countries in Europe had reformed and modernised their law, resulting in English merchant law being about a century behind mercantile law of other European countries. A merchant was, by his very nature, international, and
Somerset v Stewart - Misplaced Pages Continue
7980-458: The Court of Exchequer Chamber served for appeals of King's Bench decisions. Originally, the sole "court" was the curia regis , one of the three central administrative bodies along with the Exchequer and Chancery , from which the Court of Chancery formed. This curia was the King's court, composed of those advisers and courtiers who followed the King as he travelled around the country. This
8170-512: The Court of Session were sent there. A barrister had to be familiar with both Scottish and English law to deal with these cases, and Murray found his niche acting in Scottish cases in the House of Lords as early as 1733. His work in Moncrieff v Moncrieff in 1734 established Murray as a brilliant young barrister praised for his performance by Lords Cowper and Parker . After Moncrieff , Murray
8360-629: The High Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 , after which point the King's Bench was a division within the High Court. The King's Bench was staffed by one Chief Justice (now the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales ) and usually three Puisne Justices . In the 15th and 16th centuries, the King's Bench's jurisdiction and caseload was significantly challenged by the rise of
8550-557: The House of Commons as a Member of Parliament for Boroughbridge and appointment as Solicitor General . In the absence of a strong Attorney General , Mansfield became the main spokesman for the government in the House of Commons, where he was noted for his "great powers of eloquence" and was described as "beyond comparison the best speaker". With the promotion of Sir Dudley Ryder to Lord Chief Justice in 1754, Mansfield became Attorney General and, when Ryder unexpectedly died several months later, he took his place as Chief Justice. As
8740-482: The Jacobite cause, and his older brother James followed " The Old Pretender " into exile, this left the family's finance relatively impoverished. The Jacobite sympathies of Murray's family were glossed over by contemporaries, who claimed that he had been educated at Lichfield Grammar School with many other members of the English judiciary. This was incorrect, as Murray was educated at Perth Grammar School , where he
8930-515: The Magna Carta so that common pleas could be heard in "some fixed place". Thus, there were two common law courts: the curia , which followed the King, and the Common Pleas, which sat in Westminster Hall . The curia eventually became known as the King's Bench, with the King himself required to be present for the court to sit. There is some controversy over whether the original fixed court
9120-560: The Seven Years' War and his assignment in the West Indies, he brought his illegitimate daughter, Dido, whose mother, Maria Bell, was an enslaved woman of African descent. Dido was born into slavery in 1761. Dido Elizabeth Belle was baptized November 1766 in London, 8 months after Lady Elizabeth's arrival. It has been hypothesized that Mansfield took Dido in to provide grieving Lady Elizabeth with
9310-512: The appellate court the Court of Exchequer Chamber, began to overrule decisions made by the King's Bench on assumpsit , causing friction between the courts. In Slade's Case, the Chief Justice of the King's Bench , John Popham , deliberately provoked the Common Pleas into bringing an assumpsit action to a higher court where the Justices of the King's Bench could vote, allowing them to overrule
9500-402: The common law of England nor any statutory law made by Parliament recognised the existence of slavery, and that slavery in England was therefore unlawful. They also argued that English contract law did not allow for any person to enslave himself, nor could any contract be binding without the person's consent. The arguments focused on legal details rather than any humanitarian principles. When
9690-455: The curia travelled with the King, there were problems with the administration of justice. For example, if the King left the country for an extended period of time (as Richard I , who spent the vast majority of his reign overseas did), the curia followed, making hearings difficult to hold. To remedy this, a central "bench" was established; the Court of Common Pleas , initially split from the Exchequer of Pleas , received official recognition in
SECTION 50
#17330846935329880-468: The 18th century, when Britain was "the greatest manufacturing and commercial country in the world". Mansfield immediately began to reform the way the law and courts worked. One of his first acts as Lord Chief Justice was to change the system for submitting motions . Every day the court was in session, all barristers were invited to submit motions, in order of their seniority as barristers. Because they were allowed to submit as many motions as they wanted, by
10070-574: The Admiralty in the new Cabinet . With this added political influence, Murray hoped to be appointed to a government office, and when Sir John Strange resigned as Solicitor General , Murray was made a Member of Parliament for Boroughbridge on 15 December 1742 and immediately succeeded Strange as Solicitor General. Although the Solicitor General was the lowest legal appointment, a successful one could be appointed Attorney General , and by custom,
10260-586: The Attorney General was allowed to become Lord Chief Justice if a vacancy arose. Although many barristers were not good politicians, Murray became a successful Member of Parliament, and one noted for his oratorical skills and logical arguments. In 1745, Murray defended the actions of the government in hiring 16,000 Hanoverian troops to help fight in the War of the Austrian Succession . His argument (that it
10450-601: The Bill of Westminster and other legal fictions, the King's Bench gained much of the Common Pleas's jurisdiction, although the Common Pleas remained the sole place where real property claims could be brought. The head of the court was the Chief Justice of the King's Bench, a position established by 1268. From the 14th century onwards, the Chief Justice was appointed by a writ, in Latin until 1727 and in English from then on. The Chief Justice
10640-477: The Chancery writ, the case was substantially cheaper. The result of this was substantial; between 1560 and 1640, the King's Bench's business rose tenfold. This period also saw a substantial broadening of the remedies available in the common law. The main remedy and method was action on the case , which justices expanded to encompass other things. In 1499 it enabled the enforcement of parol promises, which rendered Chancery subpoenas obsolete; later developments included
10830-467: The Chief Justice, pension arrangements were formally organised in 1799, starting at £2,000 a year and peaking at £3,500 in 1825. Lord Mansfield William Murray, 1st Earl of Mansfield , PC (2 March 1705 – 20 March 1793), was a British judge, politician, lawyer, and peer best known for his reforms to English law . Born in Scone Palace , Perthshire , to a family of Scottish nobility , he
11020-499: The Chief Justices became appointed to serve "during good behaviour". The initial salary was £40 a year, with an additional £66 in 1372 and an increase to a total of £160 in 1389. An ordinance of 1646 set a fixed salary of £1,000, increased to £2,000 in 1714, £4,000 in 1733, and finally peaked at £10,000 a year in 1825. Pension arrangements were first made in 1799, peaking at £4,000 a year in 1825. The position remains to this day; after
11210-555: The City of Edinburgh for the behaviour of its citizens by disenfranchising the city. Murray represented the City in both the House of Commons and the House of Lords , and eventually whittled down the bill so much that, by the time it was voted on, it simply proposed to fine the city and disqualify the Provost . In exchange for his work, the citizens of Edinburgh gave him the Freedom of the City and
11400-426: The Common Pleas and establish assumpsit as the main contractual action. After the death of Edmund Anderson , the more activist Francis Gawdy became Chief Justice of the Common Pleas , which briefly led to a less reactionary and more revolutionary Common Pleas. The struggle continued even after this point. The Interregnum granted some respite to the Common Pleas, which abolished fines on original writs, hurting
11590-493: The Court of Common Pleas, eyre circuits, assize courts and local courts, but was not a court of last resort; its own records were sent to Parliament to be signed off on. The creation of the Court of Exchequer Chamber in 1585 created a court from which King's Bench decisions could be appealed to, and with the expansion of the Exchequer Chamber's jurisdiction in 1830 the King's Bench ceased to be an appellate court. Thanks to
SECTION 60
#173308469353211780-477: The Court of King's Bench, which would determine whether his imprisonment was legal. Mansfield ordered a hearing for 22 January 1772. Following an adjournment, the case was not heard until 7 February 1772. In the meantime, the case had attracted a great deal of attention in the press, and members of the public were forthcoming with donations to fund lawyers for both sides of the argument. An activist layman, Granville Sharp , who continually sought test cases against
11970-498: The Dean, Francis Atterbury . Thirteen year old Murray travelled alone with a pony given by his father, The distance from Perth to London was around 400 miles (640 km), and the journey took Murray 54 days. Murray flourished at Westminster and was made a King's Scholar on 21 May 1719. After an examination in May 1723, Murray was accepted into Christ Church, Oxford , having scored higher in
12160-669: The Empire, particularly in the thirteen American colonies. Scholars have disagreed over precisely what legal precedent the case set. James Somerset , an enslaved African, was purchased by Charles Stewart (or Steuart), a customs officer when he was in Boston , Province of Massachusetts Bay , a British crown colony in North America. Stewart brought Somerset with him when he returned to England in 1769, but in October 1771 Somerset escaped. After he
12350-538: The English Court of Sessions in 1733, where he was led by Charles Talbot and opposed by Philip Yorke . The support of Talbot and Yorke allowed him to gain a respectable practice in the Court of Chancery . Murray used his first professional earnings to purchase a china and silver-plate tea set for his kind sister in-law, Lady Stormont (mother of his nephew David Murray, 7th Viscount Stormont ). Lady Stormont may have provided Murray with some financial support while he
12540-770: The French Ordinance de la Marine (a predecessor to the Napoleonic Commercial Code ), the works of Bracton and Littleton , and "crabbed and uncouth compositions" on municipal law . Murray was called to the Bar on 23 November 1730, taking a set of chambers at 5 King's Bench Walk. He was introduced to Alexander Pope around this time, and through his friendship met members of the aristocracy, some of whom later became his clients, including Sarah Churchill, Duchess of Marlborough . Pope also taught him oratory , which helped him enormously in court. His first two cases were in
12730-451: The French were likely to attack. The French did attack, and Boehm refused to fulfil the insurance claim. Mansfield decided in favour of Boehm, saying that Carter had failed his duty of uberrima fides . In his judgment Mansfield said that: Insurance is a contract based upon speculation. The special facts, upon which the contingent chance is to be computed, lie most commonly in the knowledge of
12920-521: The Judges, as usual in the Habeas Corpus, and as we at first intimated an intention of doing in this case. The only question then is, Is the cause returned sufficient for the remanding him? If not, he must be discharged. The cause returned is, the slave absented himself, and departed from his master's service, and refused to return and serve him during his stay in England; whereupon, by his master's orders, he
13110-571: The King Before the King Himself , was a court of common law in the English legal system . Created in the late 12th to early 13th century from the curia regis , the King's Bench initially followed the monarch on his travels. The King's Bench finally joined the Court of Common Pleas and Exchequer of Pleas in Westminster Hall in 1318, making its last travels in 1421. The King's Bench was merged into
13300-484: The King's Bench became a fixed court rather than one that followed the King. Like the Common Pleas, the King's Bench sat in Westminster Hall until its dissolution. During the 15th century, the traditional superiority of the common law courts was challenged by ecclesiastical courts and the equitable jurisdiction of the Lord Chancellor , exercised through the Court of Chancery. These courts were more attractive to
13490-512: The King's Bench, 13,009 in the Common Pleas and 6,778 in the Exchequer of Pleas. Not surprisingly, the King's Bench judges were "immoderately over burdened", the Common Pleas judges were "fully occupied in term, and much engaged in vacation also" and the Barons of the Exchequer were "comparatively little occupied either in term or vacation". In response to this and the report of a committee investigating
13680-408: The King's Bench, but in 1660 the fines were reinstated and "then the very attorneys of the Common Pleas boggled at them and carried all their finable business to the King's Bench". In 1661 the Common Pleas attempted to reverse this by pushing for an Act of Parliament to abolish latitats based on legal fictions, forbidding "special bail" in any case where "the true cause of action" was not expressed in
13870-510: The Marquess of Rockingham especially had a significant positive influence on his future career. After a short holiday, Murray returned to his work as a barrister. Murray had repeatedly refused to become a Member of Parliament , saying he had no interest in politics. In 1742, however, the government of Sir Robert Walpole fell, and Murray's brother-in-law, the Earl of Nottingham , became First Lord of
14060-654: The Queen's Bench Division of the High Court. The existence of the same courts as divisions of one unified body was a quirk of constitutional law, which prevented the compulsory demotion or retirement of Chief Justices. Thus all three Chief Justices (Lord Chief Justice Sir Alexander Cockburn , Chief Justice of the Common Pleas Lord Coleridge and Chief Baron of the Exchequer Sir Fitzroy Kelly ) continued in post. Kelly and Cockburn died in 1880, allowing for
14250-569: The Slavery Abolition Act 1833. India was excluded from these provisions, as slavery was considered part of the indigenous culture and was not disrupted. The Somerset case was reported in detail by the American colonial press. In Massachusetts , several slaves filed freedom suits in 1773–1774 based on Mansfield's ruling; these were supported by the colony's General Court (for freedom of the slaves), but vetoed by successive Royal governors. As
14440-467: The Somerset case does not say explicitly that slaves became free when they entered England—it is silent as to what their status in England was. In the Thames Ditton case, Lord Mansfield appeared to compare a slave's status to that of "villein in gross" —an ancient feudal status of servitude that had not been abolished from English law but which had died out. He had not done so in the Somerset case despite
14630-494: The West Indies but lived with him and his wife for 30 years.) In addition, advertisements from the 1770s show that slaves continued to be bought and sold in England. Mansfield referred to slaves in his judgment in a later case. Although slavery was not completely abolished in the British Empire until 1834, Mansfield's decision is considered to have been a significant step in recognising the illegality of slavery. Lord Mansfield
14820-679: The abolition of the Common Pleas Division and Exchequer Division by Order in Council on 16 December 1880. The High Court was reorganised into the Chancery Division, Queen's Bench Division and the Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division . Due to a misunderstanding by Sir Edward Coke in his Institutes of the Lawes of England , academics thought for a long time that the King's Bench was primarily
15010-421: The ad was acquired by Sharp. In 1788, anti-slavery campaigners, including Thomas Clarkson and James Ramsay , bought a slave in England to prove that slavery still existed in the country. In 1792, a Bristol newspaper reported the sale of a female African slave in the port. It was not until 1807 that Parliament decided to suppress the slave trade, outlawing the practice by British subjects and seeking to suppress
15200-460: The arguments of the lawyers are recorded, but those for the judgment are not. The lawyers' arguments covered the whole history of the status of slavery in mainland France. Boucaux won his case and was awarded back wages for the period of his work in France. Later that year, the national legislature passed a law to clarify some of the issues raised by the case. It did not abolish slavery in France. The law
15390-576: The beginning of 1772. Mansfield is best known for his judgment in Somersett's Case on the legality of keeping slaves in England. The English had been involved in the slave trade since 1553, and by 1768, ships registered in Liverpool, Bristol and London carried more than half the slaves shipped in the world. James Somersett was a slave owned by Charles Stewart , an American customs officer who sailed to Britain for business, landing on 10 November 1769. A few days later Somersett attempted to escape. He
15580-466: The case emphasised the issues to the public. It was widely, and incorrectly, interpreted as ending slavery in Britain. Even Mansfield himself considered slavery to still be legal in Britain. When Mansfield died, his 1782 will granted his mulatto grand-niece, Dido Elizabeth Belle , her freedom, indicating that slavery continued to be legal. Abolitionists considered this case to be Lord Mansfield's legacy and
15770-506: The case was heard. In the meantime, the case had attracted a great deal of attention in the press and members of the public donated money to support the lawyers for both sides of the argument. Granville Sharp , an abolitionist layman who continually sought test cases against the legal justifications for slavery, was Somerset's real backer. When the case was heard, five advocates appeared for Somerset, speaking at three hearings between February and May. These lawyers included Francis Hargrave ,
15960-410: The case was not this preexisting principle, which applies only to children "born after marriage", but rather whether the child had been born before the marriage. The question was whether statements the child's parents allegedly made before their deaths could be introduced as evidence that the child had been born before their marriage and was thus illegitimate. Mansfield ruled to admit the testimony against
16150-415: The case, the public at large widely understood the Somerset case to mean that, on English soil at least, no man was a slave. While Somerset's case provided a boon to the abolitionist movement, it did not end the holding of slaves within England. It also did not end British participation in the slave trade or slavery in other parts of the British Empire , where colonies had established slave laws. Despite
16340-568: The cause set forth by this return is allowed or approved of by the laws of this kingdom, therefore the black must be discharged. Somerset was freed and his supporters, who included black and white Londoners, celebrated. While argument by counsel may have been based primarily on legal technicalities, Lord Mansfield appeared to believe that a great moral question had been posed and he deliberately avoided answering that question in full, because of its profound political and economic consequences. There were reactions from prominent individuals in Britain over
16530-476: The church, Robertson escaped completely. Wilson had been a smuggler who supplied his fellow citizens with goods and, because of this and the unpopularity of the city guard, public opinion was firmly on his side. Porteous was the captain of the Edinburgh city guard, and was angry with Wilson's attempt to escape and aware of the possibility of an attempt to free him. Porteous ordered a guard of 80 men to be placed around
16720-455: The colonies". Lord Stowell further said: Thus fell a system which had existed in this country without doubt, and which had been occasionally forced upon its colonies and has continued to this day—that is, above fifty years—without further interruption. This wider reading of Somerset's case appears to be supported by the judgment of Mr. Justice Best in Forbes v Cochrane in 1824. He said, "There
16910-579: The common law and equity, and instead suggested a single Supreme Court capable of using both. In 1870 the Lord Chancellor, Lord Hatherly , attempted to bring the recommendations into law through an Act of Parliament, but did not go to the trouble of consulting the judiciary or the leader of the Conservatives, who controlled the House of Lords . The bill ran into strong opposition from lawyers and judges, particularly Alexander Cockburn . After Hatherly
17100-422: The common lawyers because of their informality and the simple method used to arrest defendants. The bills of complaint and subpoena used by the Chancery made court procedure far faster, and from 1460 to 1540 there was a steep decline in the number of cases in the common law courts, coinciding with a sharp increase in cases in the newer courts. This loss of business was quickly recognised by the King's Bench, which
17290-601: The concept that slavery was contrary "both to natural law and the principles of the English Constitution", a position adopted by abolitionists. The case of Knight v Wedderburn in Scotland began in 1774 and was concluded in 1778, with a ruling by the Court of Session that slavery was contrary to Scottish law. Some lawyers thought that similar determinations might be made in British colonies, which had clauses in their royal charters requiring their laws not to be contrary to
17480-444: The consequence. £ 50 a head may not be a high price; then a loss follows to the proprietors of above £700,000 sterling. How would the law stand with respect to their settlement; their wages? How many actions for any slight coercion by the master? We cannot in any of these points direct the law; the law must rule us. In these particulars, it may be matter of weighty consideration, what provisions are made or set by law. Mr. Stewart may end
17670-426: The contrary. This was an attempt by Mansfield to introduce the assumption of good faith into English law, and although it failed for the most part (as most areas of English commercial law no longer use uberrima fides ), it is still used in insurance contracts. In insurance agreements, the insuree inevitably knows more about the risk involved than the insurer; without the requirement for pre-contractual "good faith,"
17860-450: The country. A. T. Carter, in his History of English Legal Institutions , defines the early King's Bench jurisdiction as "to correct all crimes and misdemeanours that amounted to a breach of the peace, the King being then plaintiff, for such were in derogation of the Jura regalia; and to take cognizance of everything not parcelled out to the other courts". By the end of the 14th century much of
18050-520: The court issuing a final judgment. Otherwise, Mansfield said that would give judgment, and "let justice be done whatever the consequence": Easter Term, May 14, 1772 . ... Mr. Stewart advances no claim on contract; he rests his whole demand on a right to the negro as slave, and mentions the purpose of detainure to be the sending of him over to be sold in Jamaica . If the parties will have judgment, fiat justitia, ruat cælum , let justice be done whatever be
18240-405: The court system, and Francis North , Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, eventually reached a compromise by allowing such legal fictions in the Common Pleas as well as the King's Bench. The unintended outcome of these compromises was that by the end of Charles II 's reign, all three common law courts had a similar jurisdiction over most common pleas, with similar processes. By the 18th century, it
18430-555: The criminal jurisdiction had declined, although the court maintained a criminal jurisdiction over all cases in Middlesex , the county where Westminster Hall stood. The King's Bench's main jurisdiction was over "pleas of the crown"; cases which involved the King in some way. With the exception of revenue matters, which were handled by the Exchequer of Pleas, the King's Bench held exclusive jurisdiction over these cases. The Court of King's Bench did act as an appellate body, hearing appeals from
18620-479: The death of Henry Pelham , but it would have "set [his genius] in a false environment", and he declined all opportunities to return to politics except as Lord Chief Justice. Anyone wishing to become a judge was required to be a Serjeant-at-law , which Murray was not; as such, he left Lincoln's Inn to join Serjeant's Inn . He qualified as a Serjeant-at-law on 8 November 1756, and was sworn in as Lord Chief Justice at
18810-451: The decision; Sharp rhetorically asked "why is it that the poor sooty African meets with so different a measure of justice in England and America, as to be adjudged free in the one, and in the other held in the most abject Slavery?" The hymnwriter William Cowper wrote in a poem that "we have no slaves at home - then why abroad?" Polymath Benjamin Franklin , who was visiting England at the time,
19000-454: The dissolution of the Court of King's Bench, the Chief Justice has instead been the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales , now the head of the Judiciary of England and Wales . A Chief Justice of the King's Bench was assisted in his work by a number of Justices of the King's Bench . Occasionally appointed before 1272, the number fluctuated considerably between 1 and 4; from 1522, the number
19190-487: The end, merchants could continue trading slaves for 61 years after Lord Mansfield's decision. Commentators have argued that the decision's importance lay in the way it was portrayed at the time and later by the newspapers, with the assistance of a well-organised abolitionist movement. Abolitionists argued that the law of England should apply on English ships even if not in the Colonies. Stewart's counsel, funded and encouraged by
19380-487: The examination than any other King's Scholar that year. He was admitted as a commoner on 15 June 1723, and matriculated on 18 June. The records say that he came from Bath rather than Perth, as the person recording the names of the new students was unable to understand his Scottish accent. His older brother, James, was an advocate in Scotland (the Scottish equivalent of a barrister in England), and his family decided that
19570-429: The exercise of it therefore must always be regulated by the laws of the place where exercised. The state of slavery is of such a nature, that it is incapable of now being introduced by Courts of Justice upon mere reasoning or inferences from any principles, natural or political; it must take its rise from positive law; the origin of it can in no country or age be traced back to any other source: immemorial usage preserves
19760-403: The existence of slaves must be legally valid. After the attorneys for both sides had given their arguments, Mansfield called a recess, saying that "[the case] required ... [a] consultation ... among the twelve Judges". Finally, on 22 June 1772 Mansfield gave his judgment, which ruled that a master could not carry his slave out of England by force, and concluded: The state of slavery is of such
19950-522: The freedom suits of Brom and Bett v Ashley (1781) and Quock Walker (1783) in county and state courts, respectively, resulted in slavery being found irreconcilable with the new state constitution and ended it in the state. In this sense, the Walker case is seen as a United States counterpart to the Somerset Case. In the case of Quock Walker, Massachusetts' Chief Justice William Cushing gave instructions to
20140-417: The gallows for Wilson's execution. When a man attempted to cut Wilson's body down after the execution, Porteous ordered his troops to fire on the crowd, and seven people were killed. Porteous was initially sentenced to death for murder and, when the execution was delayed, a mob of citizens rushed the city jail and lynched him. As a result, a bill was proposed in the House of Commons that sought to punish
20330-485: The government. From 21 November 1768, letters written by a man under the pseudonym of Junius were published in the Public Advertiser , a London newspaper run by Henry Sampson Woodfall . In them, Junius attacked many political leaders, including Lord Granby and Mansfield. As his letters were wildly popular, the circulation of the Public Advertiser doubled in just five months. On 19 December 1769, Junius wrote
20520-402: The grant of Magna Carta . The later theory was that Henry II's decree created the Court of Common Pleas, not the King's Bench, and that the King's Bench instead split from the Common Pleas at some later time. The first records of an independent King's Bench come from 1234, when distinct plea rolls are found for each court. Modern academics give 1234 as the founding date for the King's Bench as
20710-507: The health of the Old Pretender on his knees". Although the story was proven to be false, it embarrassed Murray, and was used to taunt him as late as 1770. His rivalry with William Pitt highlighted his unsuitability for politics—unlike such other politicians as Philip Yorke and Edward Thurlow , he did not have the temperament to resist "the vehemence of Pitt's invective". It was widely felt that he could have become Prime Minister after
20900-427: The heir apparent, George III , was only a child), while the public favoured the child's mother Princess Augusta . In an attempt to reach a compromise the government introduced a bill to Parliament declaring that Augusta was to be a regent along with a council of others, and that George would become the heir when he reached maturity. Murray made a speech supporting the government's proposal, but despite this, Parliament
21090-503: The house of the Lord Chancellor that evening. Immediately afterwards he was created Baron Mansfield. On 19 November, he was sworn in as a Privy Counsellor . He suspended his duties temporarily on 5 April 1757, when appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer , due to an old custom that the Lord Chief Justice took the position when it was empty. He only served until 8 April, and there is no evidence of his performing anything more than
21280-415: The human race. And upon this ground our Constitution of Government, by which the people of this Commonwealth have solemnly bound themselves, sets out with declaring that all men are born free and equal – and that every subject is entitled to liberty, and to have it guarded by the laws, as well as life and property – and in short is totally repugnant to the idea of being born slaves. This being the case, I think
21470-471: The idea of slavery is inconsistent with our own conduct and Constitution; and there can be no such thing as perpetual servitude of a rational creature, unless his liberty is forfeited by some criminal conduct or given up by personal consent or contract ... After the American Revolution, the Somerset decision "took on a life of its own and entered the mainstream of American constitutional discourse" and
21660-454: The inconsistencies between English law and the law of other nations made business difficult. Mansfield made a great effort to bring English merchant law up to the same standards as that of other European nations, defining his position by saying that "the daily negotiations and property of merchants ought not to depend on subtleties and niceties, but upon rules easily learned and easily retained because they are dictates of common sense drawn from
21850-456: The insured only; the underwriter trusts to his representation and proceeds upon the confidence that he does not keep back any circumstance in his knowledge, to mislead the underwriter into a belief that the circumstance does not exist, and to induce him to estimate the risque as if it did not exist. Good faith forbids either party by concealing what he privately knows, to draw the other into a bargain from his ignorance of that fact, and his believing
22040-406: The insuree would have no reason to tell the truth, and insurance companies would be loath to make contracts. In the earlier case of Pillans & Rose v Van Mierop & Hopkins (1765) 3 Burr 1663, 97 ER 1035 , Mansfield had tried to challenge the doctrine of consideration . In English law, consideration is a vital part of the contract; without valid consideration, almost any contract
22230-643: The invitation of Stewart's counsel. The Somerset judgment, even if limited to prohibiting the forcible removal of slaves from England, established a radical precedent. It went against the published opinion of the Attorney-General , Sir Philip Yorke and the Solicitor-General , Mr Talbot in 1729 and the court decision of Sir Philip Yorke, by then Lord Chancellor Hardwicke, in 1749 in the case of Pearne v Lisle . The latter had stated that slaves were items of property (Hardwicke described them as 'like stock on
22420-468: The jury as follows, indicating the end of slavery in the state: As to the doctrine of slavery and the right of Christians to hold Africans in perpetual servitude, and sell and treat them as we do our horses and cattle, that (it is true) has been heretofore countenanced by the Province Laws formerly, but nowhere is it expressly enacted or established. It has been a usage – a usage which took its origin from
22610-444: The king's court but should remain there to hear the complaints of men, with this understanding that, if there should come up among them any question which could not be brought to a conclusion by them, it should be presented to a royal hearing and be determined by the king and the wiser men of the kingdom". This was originally interpreted as the foundation of the King's Bench, with the Court of Common Pleas not coming into existence until
22800-486: The laws of England; they usually contained qualifications along the lines of "so far as conveniently may be". Activists speculated that the principles behind Lord Mansfield's decision might demand a rigorous definition of "conveniently", if a case were taken to its ultimate conclusion. Such a judicial ruling never took place as the Thirteen Colonies gained independence by 1783 and established laws related to slavery, with
22990-402: The legal justifications for slavery, was Somersett's real backer. When the case was heard, no fewer than five advocates appeared for the slave, speaking at three separate hearings between February and May. These lawyers included William Davy SL , John Glynn SL, James Mansfield and Francis Hargrave , who was later to become a noted barrister based on his work in this case. Charles Stewart
23180-448: The long term. There was a steep decline in business from 1460 to 1540. As the new reforms began to take effect the King's Bench's business was significantly boosted. Between 1560 and 1640, it rose tenfold. The Common Pleas became suspicious of the new developments, as legal fictions such as the Bill of Middlesex damaged its own business. Fighting against the King's Bench in a reactionary and increasingly conservative way, an equilibrium
23370-429: The medium of a legal fiction, which was adopted for the purpose of enlarging its authority, that every person sued is in the custody of the marshal of the court and may, therefore, be proceeded against for any personal cause of actions. Thus, by degrees, this court has drawn over to itself actions which really belong to...the Court of Common Pleas. The Court of Common Pleas, however...never was able to obtain cognizance of –
23560-419: The memory of positive law long after all traces of the occasion; reason, authority, and time of its introduction are lost; and in a case so odious as the condition of slaves must be taken strictly, the power claimed by this return was never in use here; no master ever was allowed here to take a slave by force to be sold abroad because he had deserted from his service, or for any other reason whatever; we cannot say
23750-399: The merchants and the courts. Mansfield was personally a supporter of free trade who was heavily influenced by Roman law and ancient Roman and Greek writers such as Cicero and Xenophon . In 1783, Mansfield heard the case of Gregson v. Gilbert (1783) 3 Doug 232, 99 ER 629 , regarding the payment of an insurance claim for slaves killed when thrown overboard by the captain of
23940-445: The most powerful British jurist of the 18th century, Mansfield's decisions reflected the Age of Enlightenment and moved the country onto the path to abolishing slavery . He advanced commercial law in ways that helped establish Britain as world leader in industry, finance, and trade; modernised both English law and England's courts; rationalised the system for submitting motions , and reformed
24130-403: The new courts, they were viewed with suspicion by the Common Pleas, who became highly reactionary to the changes the King's Bench attempted to introduce. While the King's Bench was more revolutionary, the Common Pleas became increasingly conservative in its attempts to avoid ceding cases. The disparity between the reformist King's Bench and conservative Common Pleas was exacerbated by the fact that
24320-631: The northern states abolishing it, several gradually. The Royal Navy began unilaterally interdicting the Atlantic slave trade in 1807 with the establishment of the West Africa Squadron . At its height slavery interdiction would take up a 6th of the Royal Navy's fleet and would interdict the African–Middle East slave trade. Slavery in the rest of the British Empire continued until it was ended by
24510-457: The official report of the case, Lord Mansfield is recorded as interrupting counsel to state "The determinations go no further than that the master cannot by force compel him to go out of the kingdom." The official report of Thames Ditton case supports the account of his judgment given in The Times letter and it is the strongest argument for a limited scope to the decision. Mansfield's judgment in
24700-530: The old hereditary positions in Scotland. In 1751 he drafted the government response to an attempt by the King of Prussia to frustrate neutral shipping, which Lord Stowell called "the foundation of the modern law of neutrality", and Montesquieu described it as a "résponse sans réplique" (response without a reply). The death of Frederick , the heir to the British throne on 20 March 1751, caused constitutional chaos; George II wished to appoint his favourite son Prince William, Duke of Cumberland , as Regent (since
24890-521: The only requirement for a person to be called to the Bar was for him to have eaten five dinners a term at Lincoln's Inn, and to have read the first sentence of a paper prepared for him by the steward. Thus, most of Murray's practical training came from reading the papers in Hamilton's chambers, and listening to Lord Raymond speak in court along with tutoring by Thomas Denison on how to write special pleadings . Murray also studied various texts, including
25080-408: The opinion of Sir Philip York and Mr. Talbot in the year 1729, by which they pledged themselves to the British planters for the legal consequences of bringing slaves into this kingdom, or their being baptized; which opinion was repeated and recognized by Lord Hardwicke , sitting as Chancellor on the 19th of October, 1749, to the following effect: he said, that trover would lay for a negro slave; that
25270-531: The opportunity, and immediately applied to replace him as Lord Chief Justice. He was accepted, and although his appointment delighted Murray, the government was very concerned at the loss of a good Attorney General. In an attempt to persuade him to stay, the new Prime Minister, the Duke of Newcastle offered him the post of Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster , in addition to the position of Attorney General, an extra £6,000
25460-470: The peculiar subject of King's Bench jurisdiction – Crown Pleas... the Exchequer has adopted a similar course for, though it was originally confined to the trial of revenue cases, it has, by means of another fiction – the supposition that everybody sued is a debtor to the Crown, and further, that he cannot pay his debt, because the other party will not pay him, – opened its doors to every suitor, and so drawn to itself
25650-496: The person's consent. The arguments thus focused on legal details rather than humanitarian principles. A law passed in 1765 said that all lands, forts and slaves owned by the Africa Company were a property of the Crown, which could be interpreted to mean that the Crown accepted slavery. When the two lawyers for Charles Stewart put their case, they argued that a contract for the sale of a slave was recognised in England, and therefore
25840-575: The practice of some of the European nations, and the regulations of British government respecting the then Colonies, for the benefit of trade and wealth. But whatever sentiments have formerly prevailed in this particular or slid in upon us by the example of others, a different idea has taken place with the people of America, more favorable to the natural rights of mankind, and to that natural, innate desire of Liberty, with which Heaven (without regard to color, complexion, or shape of noses-features) has inspired all
26030-497: The press. In a response to Junius' letter dated 16 November 1770, Mansfield made the following threat: Although the Attorney General , William de Grey , advised that the publishers should again be prosecuted, Mansfield disagreed, saying that if they failed to respond to Junius, he would become bored and stop writing. Mansfield was evidently correct, because other than a letter printed on 5 October 1771, Junius ceased to write at
26220-491: The process. The King's Bench got around this in the 1670s; the Act did not say that the process had to be true, so the court continued to use legal fictions, simply ensuring that the true cause of action was expressed in the process, regardless of whether or not it was correct. The Bill of Middlessex disclosed the true cause of action, satisfying the 1661 statute, but did not require a valid complaint. This caused severe friction within
26410-467: The question, by discharging or giving freedom to the negro. Stewart opted to continue with the case, and Mansfield retired to make his decision, reserving judgment for over a month. He gave his judgment on 22 June 1772 (this version, with modern paragraphing, is transcribed from a letter to the General Evening Post , reporting on the trial). Trinity Term, June 22, 1772. We pay due attention to
26600-417: The recovery of debts, suing for defamatory words (previously an ecclesiastical matter) and action on the case for trover and conversion . Most of this reform took place under Fineux CJ , who never lived to see the results of his work; it took over 100 years for the reforms to fully reverse the decline in business. While these reforms succeeded in forming an equilibrium between the old common law courts and
26790-426: The right of trying cases, that were never intended to be placed within its jurisdiction. The purpose of Brougham's speech was to illustrate that three courts of identical jurisdiction were unnecessary, and further that it would create a situation where the best judges, lawyers and cases would eventually go to one court, overburdening that body and leaving the others near useless. In 1823, 43,465 actions were brought in
26980-400: The rules so that, unless the court had doubts over the evidence presented to them, a judgment was to be made immediately. This had a far-reaching effect on the English courts. Judges from the Court of Appeal and High Court of Justice now give reserved judgments in only a minority of cases. His reforms led to the Court of King's Bench becoming one of the most active courts, at the expense of
27170-460: The ruling, escaped slaves continued to be recaptured in England. Just a year after the Somerset ruling, there was a newspaper report of a runaway being recaptured and committing suicide in England. In addition, contemporary newspaper advertisements show that slaves continued to be bought and sold in the British Isles. In 1779, a Liverpool newspaper advertised the sale of a black boy and a clipping of
27360-529: The ruling. Some historians believe that between 14,000 and 15,000 slaves were immediately freed in England, some of whom remained with their masters as paid or unpaid employees. However, it is questionable whether that many black people lived in England at the time, and most of them were already free men and women, or were runaway slaves who had evaded the authorities. The decision was vague enough to allow Africans to still be hunted and kidnapped in London, Liverpool and Bristol to be sold elsewhere. (Such an incident
27550-453: The same passage in the informal report by letter to the Evening Post , quoted above, does. In 1785, Lord Mansfield expressed the view in R v Inhabitants of Thames Ditton that his ruling in the Somerset case decided only that a slave could not be forcibly removed from England against his will. In the Thames Ditton case, a black woman named Charlotte Howe had been brought to England as
27740-488: The slave merchants, argued that the consequence of a judgment in Somerset's favour might be to free the slaves in England, said to be 14,000 in number. As Lord Mansfield said in the case report, "The setting 14,000 or 15,000 men at once free loose by a solemn opinion is much disagreeable in the effects it threatens". He tried to persuade Stewart to settle by releasing Somerset and so avoid a decision, as he had done in other cases. In 1780, Mansfield's house had been firebombed by
27930-478: The slow pace of the Court of Chancery , the Judicature Commission was formed in 1867, and given a wide remit to investigate reform of the courts, the law, and the legal profession. Five reports were issued, from 25 March 1869 to 10 July 1874, with the first (dealing with the formation of a single Supreme Court of Judicature) considered the most influential. The report disposed of the previous idea of merging
28120-520: The standard day-to-day duties. He became a cabinet minister in 1757, still serving as Lord Chief Justice, and stayed until 1765. Mansfield first sat in court on 11 November 1756, and at the time had "a very low estimate of the Common Law of England which he was to administer". The legal system had been put together in the period immediately after the Norman conquest of England , and was completely unsuited to
28310-413: The three Common Pleas prothonotaries could not agree on how to cut costs, leaving the court both expensive and of limited malleability while the King's Bench became faster, cheaper and more varied in its jurisdiction. The troubles during this period are best illustrated by Slade's Case . Under the medieval common law, claims seeking the repayment of a debt or other matters could only be pursued through
28500-449: The time junior barristers were allowed to submit their motions, it was normally the end of the day. This meant that almost all the work went to the senior barristers, who were so overworked that they often did not have time to prepare properly before going to court. In addition it meant that work for junior barristers was scarce, hindering their careers. Mansfield changed the system so that barristers were allowed to submit only one motion
28690-609: The trade by foreigners, through the sea power of the Royal Navy . Although the slave trade was suppressed, slavery continued in various parts of the British Empire until it was abolished by the Slavery Abolition Act 1833 . The slave merchants who funded Stewart's defence were not anxious about James Somerset or the relatively limited number of slaves in Great Britain but about how abolition might affect their overseas interests. In
28880-498: The truth of the case". In most European countries, the principle was that a merchant was bound by his promises, not just his signed legal documents, while English lawyers maintained that a merchant could only be legally bound by documents that he signed. The European principle was based on the assumption of good faith on the part of the merchants, or uberrima fides , something completely lacking in English law. In Carter v Boehm (1746) 3 Burr 1905, 96 ER 342 , Mansfield got
29070-460: The two lawyers for Charles Stewart put their case, they argued that property was paramount and that it would be dangerous to free all the black people in England (who, according to Lord Mansfield's later judgment in the case, numbered 14,000 or 15,000). After hearing oral arguments, Lord Mansfield proposed that Stewart could avoid the potentially far-reaching effects on slave-owners' profits if he were to allow Somerset to go free and not to insist on
29260-496: The way judgments were delivered to reduce expense for the parties. For his work in Carter v Boehm and Pillans v Van Mierop , Mansfield has been called the founder of English commercial law. Mansfield is also known for his judgment in Somerset v Stewart where he held that slavery had no basis in common law and had never been established by positive law in England, and therefore
29450-591: Was a bookseller who in 1729 had purchased the publishing rights to James Thomson 's poem " The Seasons ". After the term of the exclusive rights granted under the Statute of Anne expired, Robert Taylor began publishing his own competing publication, which contained Thomson's poem. Mansfield, sitting with three other judges, concluded that despite the Statute of Anne there was a perpetual common law copyright , and therefore that no works can ever be considered public domain . This
29640-440: Was a constant rival to Murray until Pitt's death in 1778. There is very little information about Murray's time at Oxford. It is known that he studied ancient and modern history, became fluent in French, and gained a good understanding of Roman Law . He also became fluent in Latin, translating Cicero 's works into English and then back into Latin. He gained his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1727, and travelled to London to train as
29830-489: Was a law student, on top of sending him food packages, including his favorite Scottish marmalade, when he was a young lawyer. The 1707 Acts of Union had merged the Kingdom of England and Kingdom of Scotland into one national entity, but they retained separate legal systems. However, the House of Lords became the highest court of appeal in both English and Scottish law and, as a result, from 1707 Scottish cases on appeal from
30020-488: Was a massive victory for booksellers and publishers, as it meant that they could effectively make it impossible for new companies to compete, as in the absence of new texts, there was nothing they could print. Mansfield's judgment was finally overruled by the House of Lords in Donaldson v Beckett in 1774. Mansfield's judgment has been criticised as being unusually short-sighted because he failed to see that while his decision
30210-431: Was assumed to already be in the court's custody and presence in court was not needed. Thus a legal fiction arose; if A wished to sue B for trespass, debt and detinue, he would have a writ issued for trespass. B would be arrested as a result, and the covenant, detinue and debt actions undertaken by bill after he had been detained. Eventually it became even more fictitious; if A wished to sue B merely for debt and detinue,
30400-505: Was born a slave in the French colony of Saint-Domingue (now Haiti ). He was brought by his master Verdelin, an army sergeant, to France in 1728, where he served as his cook. After some years, Verdelin began to seriously mistreat Boucaux. The slave had married a French woman without Verdelin's consent, and the master had him imprisoned for fear that Boucaux would try to escape. Boucaux filed a freedom suit from prison, seeking confirmation of his free status in France. Following French practice,
30590-431: Was correct for that particular case, the precedent it would set would create an unfair monopoly for the booksellers and publishers. This was one of only a small number of cases in which Mansfield was overruled; in his entire career only six of his judgments were overturned by a higher court. Mansfield's judgement here has been seen as part of a wider agenda; along with other legal figures such as Sir William Blackstone , he
30780-449: Was customary to speak of the "twelve justices" of the three courts, not distinguishing them, and assize cases were shared equally between them. In 1828, Henry Brougham complained that: [t]he jurisdiction of the Court of King's Bench, for example, was originally confined to pleas of the Crown, and then extended to actions where violence was used – actions of trespass, by force; but now, all actions are admissible within its walls, through
30970-529: Was educated in Perth before moving to London at the age of 13 to study at Westminster School . Accepted into Christ Church, Oxford , in May 1723, Mansfield graduated four years later and returned to London, where he was he was called to the Bar by Lincoln's Inn in November 1730 and quickly gained a reputation as an excellent barrister . He became involved in British politics in 1742, beginning with his election to
31160-505: Was effectively overruled by the House of Lords in Rann v Hughes [1778] 7 T. R. 350. Mansfield also enforced a previous judgement of the Court of King's Bench made in 1645, in which they allowed a special jury of merchants to sit in cases involving commercial law. He built up a special corps of these jurymen, some of whom, such as Edward Vaux , became noted experts on commercial law. "Lord Mansfield's jurymen" acted as an effective liaison between
31350-404: Was eventually reached in the 17th century until the merger in 1873. The King's Bench's jurisdiction initially covered a wide range of criminal matters, any business not claimed by the other courts, and any cases concerning the monarch. Until 1830, the King's Bench acted as a court of appeal for the Exchequer of Pleas and Common Pleas, and required Parliament to sign off on its decisions. From 1585,
31540-429: Was fixed at 3. Provisions for a fourth were established in 1830, and a fifth in 1868. Following the dissolution of the Court of King's Bench, the remaining Justices because Justices of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice. Justices were originally paid £26 a year, increasing to £66 in 1361, and £100 in 1389. An ordinance of 1645 increased this to £1,000, with the salary peaking at £5,500 in 1825. As with
31730-406: Was implemented with regulations requiring the registration of slaves. The law provided that masters could bring colonial slaves to live and train in a "useful trade" in France for up to three years, without losing the right to return such slaves to servitude in the colonies. Other cases followed. Court of King%27s Bench (England) The Court of King's Bench , formally known as The Court of
31920-616: Was important in anti-slavery constitutionalism. In the Southern states, slavery was integral to the economy and expanded after the Revolution, due largely to the development of the cotton gin , making cultivation of short-staple cotton profitable as a commodity crop throughout the Deep South, in the early to mid-19th century. Somerset's case has been compared to the major French case on the same question, Jean Boucaux v Verdelin of 1738. Boucaux
32110-612: Was involved in almost every case in the House of Lords, whether it had been appealed from a Scottish court or not. In 1737, Murray acted as Counsel for the City of Edinburgh in the aftermath of the death of Captain John Porteous . In Edinburgh, it was traditional for criminals sentenced to death to be allowed to visit a church near the city jail the Sunday before the execution. Two criminals named Wilson and Robertson took this as an opportunity to escape; although Wilson did not make it out of
32300-431: Was less impressed with the celebrations of British abolitionists over the case, criticising their celebrations, O Pharisaical Britain! to pride thyself in setting free a single Slave that happens to land on thy coasts, while thy Merchants in all thy ports are encouraged by thy laws to continue a commerce whereby so many hundreds of thousands are dragged into a slavery that can scarce be said to end with their lives, since it
32490-470: Was married to Thomas Watson-Wentworth, 1st Marquess of Rockingham . Some of the aristocrats thought that the bride had married way below her status, and they also accused the groom (at the time just Mr. Murray) of social climbing into one of the great English families which the Finches belonged to. Indeed, Mansfield's marriage helped him be accepted by the highest level of the aristocracy. Murray's connection with
32680-408: Was not a dedicated court of law, instead a descendant of the curia ducis and partly of the witenagemot . In concert with the curia regis , eyre circuits staffed by itinerant judges dispensed justice throughout the country, operating on fixed paths at certain times. These judges were also members of the curia , and would hear cases on the King's behalf in the "lesser curia regis ". Because
32870-551: Was not binding in law. Though the judgement did not explicitly outlaw slavery in either Britain or British colonies , it played an important role in the early stages of the British abolitionist movement and inspired challenges to slavery on both sides of the Atlantic. Murray was born on 2 March 1705, at Scone Palace in Perthshire , Scotland , the fourth son of the 5th Viscount of Stormont and his wife Margaret as one of eleven children. Both his parents were strong supporters of
33060-707: Was not convinced that a council was necessary. On 6 March 1754, the Prime Minister Henry Pelham died, and this necessitated a Cabinet reshuffle. The Attorney General , Sir Dudley Ryder , became Lord Chief Justice of the King's Bench, and Murray became Attorney General in his place. A few months later the Master of the Rolls died, and Murray was asked to replace him; he declined, however, as he "did not want to leave His Majesty's service". After Ryder died unexpectedly on 25 May 1756, however, Murray could not turn down
33250-545: Was personally in favour of a perpetual copyright. In 1695 Parliament failed to renew the Licensing Acts , and as a result, the press were free to print material attacking the government. Although there were eight attempts to force a new Licensing Act through Parliament between 1697 and 1713, none of them succeeded. Despite the freedom of the press from pre-censorship by the government, the judiciary regularly tried people for seditious libel if they printed material attacking
33440-441: Was punished, if at all. Woodfall was tried on 13 June 1770, by Mansfield and a jury. While Mansfield believed that the language used was libellous, the jury disagreed, and held that he was "guilty of printing and publishing only", and innocent of seditious libel. Miller was tried on 13 July 1770, and after six hours of discussion, the jury found him innocent. As a result of these two trials, it became clear that no jury would convict
33630-434: Was put on board the ship by force, and there detained in secure custody, to be carried out of the kingdom and sold. So high an act of dominion must derive its authority, if any such it has, from the law of the kingdom where executed. A foreigner cannot be imprisoned here on the authority of any law existing in his own country: the power of a master over his servant is different in all countries, more or less limited or extensive;
33820-512: Was questioned; and it was resolved, that England was too pure an air for a slave to breathe in"; it is not clear that this was said in the Cartwright case. Some legal historians think it was a misquote of an excerpt from Lord Chief Justice John Holt 's judgment in Smith v Gould , in which he is reported to have said: "as soon as a negro comes to England he is free; one may be a villein in England but not
34010-492: Was recaptured in November and imprisoned on the ship Ann and Mary , owned by Captain John Knowles and bound for the British colony of Jamaica . Stewart intended to sell him there. However, three people claiming to be Somersett's godparents, John Marlow, Thomas Walkin and Elizabeth Cade, made an application before the Court of King's Bench for a writ of habeas corpus , and Captain Knowles was ordered to produce Somersett before
34200-523: Was recaptured in November, Stewart had him imprisoned on the ship Ann and Mary (under Captain John Knowles), bound for the British colony of Jamaica . He directed that Somerset be sold to a plantation for labour. Somerset's three godparents from his baptism as a Christian in England—John Marlow, Thomas Walkin and Elizabeth Cade—made an application on 3 December before the Court of King's Bench for
34390-404: Was recounted by Olaudah Equiano in 1774 in his autobiography, An Interesting Narrative (1789).) Mansfield believed that his decision meant that slavery continued, because his mixed-race great-niece Dido Elizabeth Belle remained a slave in his household, until his 1793 will allowed her to be considered a free woman. (She had been born into slavery as the illegitimate daughter of his nephew in
34580-551: Was replaced by Lord Selborne in September 1872, a second bill was introduced after consultation with the judiciary; although along the same lines, it was far more detailed. The Act, passed as the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 , merged the Common Pleas, Exchequer, Queen's Bench and Court of Chancery into one body, the High Court of Justice , with the divisions between the courts to remain. The Queen's Bench thus ceased to exist, holding its last session on 6 July 1875, except as
34770-405: Was represented by John Dunning and James Wallace . On behalf of Somersett, it was argued that while colonial laws might permit slavery, neither the common law of England, nor any law made by Parliament recognised the existence of slavery, and slavery was therefore illegal. Moreover, English contract law did not allow for any person to enslave himself, nor could any contract be binding without
34960-406: Was said to be the first Scot to practise at the English Bar, and one of the few people who was qualified to act as a barrister in both England and Scotland. Hamilton had been one of Murray's sponsors when he joined Lincoln's Inn in 1724 and, when Murray came to London, Hamilton helped find him a set of barristers' chambers at No. 1 Old Square. There was no formal legal education at this time, and
35150-412: Was taken, and upon their best consideration they were both clearly of opinion, that a slave did not in the least alter his situation or state toward his master or owner, either by being christened, or coming to England; that though the statute of Charles II had abolished tenure so far, that no man could be a villein regerdane [ sic ; scribal error: read regardant ], yet if he would acknowledge himself
35340-442: Was taught Latin , English grammar, and essay writing skills. He later said that this gave him a great advantage at university, as those students educated in England had been taught Greek and Latin but not how to write properly in English. While at Perth Grammar School, it became apparent that Murray was particularly intelligent. In 1718, his father and older brother, James , decided to send him to Westminster School as James knew
35530-501: Was the Common Pleas or King's Bench. In 1178, a chronicler recorded that when Henry II : learned that the land and the men of the land were burdened by so great a number of justices, for there were, eighteen, chose with the counsel of the wise men of his Kingdom five only, two clerks three and laymen, all of his private family, and decreed that these five should hear all complaints of the Kingdom and should do right and should not depart from
35720-424: Was the most senior judge in the superior courts, having superiority over the Chief Justice of the Common Pleas and Chief Baron of the Exchequer , and from 1612 the Master of the Rolls . Unlike other Chief Justices, who were appointed to serve "during the King's Pleasure", the appointment as Chief Justice of the King's Bench "did not usually specify any particular tenure". This practice ended in 1689, when all of
35910-531: Was the prerogative of the King to decide how a war should be fought, and he should not be second-guessed by politicians with no experience of warfare) defeated the motion to cease employing the Hanoverian troops by 231 votes to 181. Murray became popular with both the government and George II as a result, and in the absence of a strong Attorney General, Murray spoke for the government in most matters. In 1747, he helped Lord Hardwicke write and pass an act to abolish
36100-401: Was urged by Fairfax J in 1501 to develop new remedies so that "subpoenas would not be used as often as they are at present". From 1500 the King's Bench began reforming to increase its business and jurisdiction, with the tide finally turning in their favour by 1550. The recovery of the King's Bench was thanks to its use of Chancery-like procedure; centrally, the system of bills. Prior to this,
#531468