Misplaced Pages

#216783

26-451: Simon challenged Ehrlich to choose any raw material he wanted and a date more than a year away, and he would wager on the inflation-adjusted prices decreasing as opposed to increasing. Ehrlich chose copper , chromium , nickel , tin , and tungsten . The bet was formalized on September 29, 1980, with September 29, 1990, as the payoff date. Ehrlich lost the bet, as all five commodities that were bet on declined in price from 1980 through 1990,

52-588: A barrel oil soon?" and with oil trading in the $ 12/barrel range, David South offered $ 1,000 to any economist who would bet with him that the price of oil would be greater than $ 12/barrel in 2010. No economist took him up on the offer. However, in October 2000, Zagros Madjd-Sadjadi, an economist with The University of the West Indies, bet $ 1,000 with David South that the inflation-adjusted price of oil would decrease to an inflation-adjusted price of $ 25 by 2010 (down from what

78-667: A distinction between "engineering” and "economic" forecasting. Engineering forecasting consists of estimating the amount of known physical amount of resources, extrapolates the rate of use from current use and subtracts one from the other. Simon argues that these simple analyses are often wrong. While focusing only on proven resources is helpful in a business context, it is not appropriate for economy-wide forecasting. There exist undiscovered sources, sources not yet economically feasible to extract, sources not yet technologically feasible to extract, and ignored resources that could prove useful but are not yet worth trying to discover. To counter

104-489: A pound in 1980 (equivalent to $ 14.42 in 2023), was down to $ 3.70 in 1990 (equivalent to $ 8.63 in 2023). Tin, which was $ 8.72 a pound in 1980 (equivalent to $ 32.25 in 2023), was down to $ 3.88 a decade later (equivalent to $ 9.05 in 2023). As a result, in October 1990, Paul Ehrlich mailed Julian Simon a check for $ 576.07 (equivalent to $ 1,343.48 in 2023) to settle the wager in Simon's favor. Julian Simon won because

130-409: A ten-year future period. The bets were: Simon declined Ehrlich and Schneider's offer to bet, and used the following analogy to explain why he did so: Let me characterize their offer as follows. I predict, and this is for real, that the average performances in the next Olympics will be better than those in the last Olympics. On average, the performances have gotten better, Olympics to Olympics, for

156-542: A variety of reasons. What Ehrlich and others says [ sic ] is that they don't want to bet on athletic performances, they want to bet on the conditions of the track, or the weather, or the officials, or any other such indirect measure. In his 1981 book The Ultimate Resource , Simon noted that not all decreases in resources or increases in unwanted effects correspond to overall decreases in human wellbeing. Hence, there can be an "optimal level of pollution," which accepts some increases in certain kinds of pollution in

182-493: A way that increases overall wellbeing while acknowledging that any increase in pollution is nevertheless a cost that must be considered in any such calculation . Simon's theory of resource development actually predicts some of the aforementioned trends, which do not in and of themselves even qualify as costs (unlike pollution). E.g., he pointed out that, due to increased efficiency, the amount of cropland required and actually used to grow food for each person has decreased over time and

208-485: Is a 1981 book written by Julian Lincoln Simon challenging the notion that humanity was running out of natural resources . It was updated in 1996 as The Ultimate Resource 2 . The overarching thesis on why there is no resource crisis is that as a particular resource becomes more scarce , its price rises. This price rise creates an incentive for people to discover more of the resource, ration and recycle it, and eventually, develop substitutes. The "ultimate resource"

234-407: Is likely to continue to do so . The same might potentially be true of decreased reliance on firewood in developing countries and per capita use of specific food sources like rice, wheat, and fish if economic development makes a diverse range of alternative foods available. Some have also proven false, e.g., the amount of ozone in the lower atmosphere has decreased from 1994 to 2004. If Simon had taken

260-636: Is not any particular physical object but the capacity for humans to invent and adapt. The work opens with an explanation of scarcity, noting its relation to price; high prices denote relative scarcity and low prices indicate abundance . Simon usually measures prices in wage-adjusted terms, since this is a measure of how much labor is required to purchase a fixed amount of a particular resource. Since prices for most raw materials (e.g., copper ) have fallen between 1800 and 1990 (adjusting for wages and adjusting for inflation ), Simon argues that this indicates that those materials have become less scarce. Simon makes

286-423: The 19th century; oil since the 1850s; and various metals since the 1970s. Based on preliminary research for The Ultimate Resource , Simon and Paul Ehrlich made a famous wager in 1980, betting on a mutually agreed upon measure of resource scarcity over the decade leading up to 1990. Ehrlich was the author of a popular book, The Population Bomb , which argued that mankind was facing a demographic catastrophe with

SECTION 10

#1732869836217

312-513: The bet had been for a different period, or if the start date had been different. Ehrlich wrote that the five metals in question had increased in price between the years 1950 and 1975. Asset manager Jeremy Grantham wrote that if the Simon-Ehrlich wager had been for a longer period (from 1980 to 2011), then Simon would have lost on four of the five metals. However, economist Mark J. Perry noted that for an even longer period of time, from 1934 to 2013,

338-529: The bet, he would have lost on 11 out of 15 trends. In 1996, Simon bet $ 1,000 with David South, professor of the Auburn University School of Forestry, that the inflation-adjusted price of timber would decrease in the following five years. Simon paid out early on the bet in 1997 (before his death in 1998) based on his expectation that prices would remain above 1996 levels (which they did). In 1999, when The Economist headlined an article entitled, "$ 5

364-408: The book is that natural resources are infinite. Simon argues not that there is an infinite physical amount of, say, copper, but for human purposes that amount should be treated as infinite because it is not bounded or limited in any economic sense, because: The ever-decreasing prices, in wage-adjusted terms , indicate decreasing scarcity, in that it takes less time for the average worker to earn

390-421: The commodity's price on that date would be lower than what it was at the time of the wager. Ehrlich and his colleagues picked five metals that they thought would undergo big price increases: chromium, copper, nickel, tin, and tungsten. Then, on paper, they bought $ 200 worth of each, for a total bet of $ 1,000, using the prices on September 29, 1980, as an index. They designated September 29, 1990, 10 years hence, as

416-587: The end of civilization brought on by a crisis of resources. Simon lists several past unfounded environmental fears in order to back his claim that modern fears are nothing new and will also be disproven. Some of the "crises" he notes are a shortage of tin in the 13th century BCE ; disappearing forests in Greece in 550 BCE and in England in the 16th century to 18th century CE ; food in 1798; coal in Great Britain in

442-404: The following decade. As a result, in October 1990, Paul Ehrlich mailed Julian Simon a check for US$ 576.07 to settle the wager in Simon's favor. A large section of the book is dedicated to showing how population growth ultimately creates more resources. The basic argument echoes the overarching thesis: as resources become more scarce, the price rises, creating an incentive to adapt. It suggests that

468-473: The inflation-adjusted price of the Dow Jones-AIG Commodities Index showed "an overall significant downward trend" and concluded that Simon was "more right than lucky". Understanding that Simon wanted to bet again, Ehrlich and climatologist Stephen Schneider counter-offered, challenging Simon to bet on 15 current trends, betting $ 1,000 that each will get worse (as in the previous wager) over

494-461: The money required to purchase a set amount of some commodity. This suggests, Simon claims, an enduring trend of increased availability that will not cease in the foreseeable future, despite continued population growth. A plurality of the book consists of chapters showcasing the economics of one resource or another and proposing why this resource is, for human purposes, infinite. Simon argues that for thousands of years, people have always worried about

520-443: The payoff date. If the inflation-adjusted prices of the various metals rose in the interim, Simon would pay Ehrlich the combined difference. If the prices fell, Ehrlich et al. would pay Simon. Between 1980 and 1990, the world's population grew by more than 800 million, the largest increase in one decade in all of history. But by September 1990, the price of each of Ehrlich's selected metals had fallen. Chromium, which had sold for $ 3.90

546-422: The price of three of the five metals went down in nominal terms and all five of the metals fell in price in inflation-adjusted terms, with both tin and tungsten falling by more than half. In his book Betrayal of Science and Reason , Ehrlich wrote that Simon asserted "that humanity would never run out of anything". Ehrlich added that he and fellow scientists viewed renewable resources as more important indicators of

SECTION 20

#1732869836217

572-410: The problems of engineering forecasting, Simon proposes economic forecasting, which proceeds in three steps in order to capture, in part, the unknowns the engineering method leaves out (p 27): # Ask whether there is any convincing reason to think that the period for which you are forecasting will be different from the past, going back as far as the data will allow Perhaps the most controversial claim in

598-430: The rate of population growth quickly outstripping growth in the supply of food and resources. Simon was highly skeptical of such claims. Simon had Ehrlich choose five of several commodity metals. Ehrlich chose five metals: copper, chromium, nickel, tin, and tungsten. Simon bet that their prices would go down. Ehrlich bet they would go up. The basket of goods, costing US$ 1,000 in 1980, fell in price by over 57 percent over

624-437: The state of planet Earth, but that he decided to go along with the bet anyway. Afterward, Simon offered to raise the wager to $ 20,000 and to use any resources at any time that Ehrlich preferred. Ehrlich countered with a challenge to bet that temperatures would increase in the future. The two were unable to reach an agreement on the terms of a second wager before Simon died. Some observers have argued that Ehrlich could have won if

650-424: The wager period. In 1968, Ehrlich published The Population Bomb , which argued that mankind was facing a demographic catastrophe with the rate of population growth quickly outstripping growth in the supply of food and resources. Simon was highly skeptical of such claims, so he proposed a wager, telling Ehrlich to select any raw material he wanted and select "any date more than a year away," and Simon would bet that

676-636: Was then $ 30/barrel). Madjd-Sadjadi paid South an inflation-adjusted $ 1,242 in January 2010. The price of oil at the time was $ 81/barrel. Inflation-adjusted Too Many Requests If you report this error to the Wikimedia System Administrators, please include the details below. Request from 172.68.168.226 via cp1108 cp1108, Varnish XID 829166641 Upstream caches: cp1108 int Error: 429, Too Many Requests at Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:43:56 GMT The Ultimate Resource The Ultimate Resource

#216783