Misplaced Pages

SWIG

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The Simplified Wrapper and Interface Generator ( SWIG ) is an open-source software tool used to connect computer programs or libraries written in C or C++ with scripting languages such as Lua , Perl , PHP , Python , R , Ruby , Tcl , and other language implementations like C# , Java , JavaScript , Go , D , OCaml , Octave , Scilab and Scheme . Output can also be in the form of XML .

#10989

83-451: The aim is to allow the calling of native functions (that were written in C or C++) by other programming languages, passing complex data types to those functions, keeping memory from being inappropriately freed, inheriting object classes across languages, etc. The programmer writes an interface file containing a list of C/C++ functions to be made visible to an interpreter. SWIG will compile the interface file and generate code in regular C/C++ and

166-546: A String object containing all the information necessary to reconstitute objects of this class and all referenced objects up to a maximum depth given as an integer parameter (a value of -1 implies that depth checking should be disabled). The class method _load should take a String and return an object of this class. Serde is the most widely used library, or crate, for serialization in Rust . In general, non-recursive and non-sharing objects can be stored and retrieved in

249-402: A scripting engine in an existing C/C++ program: There are several reasons to create dynamic libraries that can be loaded into extant interpreters, including: SWIG is written in C and C++ and has been publicly available since February 1996. The initial author and main developer was David M. Beazley who developed SWIG while working as a graduate student at Los Alamos National Laboratory and

332-473: A C backend. In 2009, SWIG again participated in Google Summer of Code. This time four students participated. Baozeng Ding worked on a Scilab module. Matevz Jekovec spent time on C++0x features. Ashish Sharma spent his summer on an Objective-C module, Miklos Vajna spent his time on PHP directors. In 2012, SWIG participated in Google Summer of Code. This time four out of five students successfully completed

415-451: A Swing component, or any component which inherits it, may be serialized to a byte stream, but it is not guaranteed that this will be re-constitutable on another machine. Since ECMAScript 5.1, JavaScript has included the built-in JSON object and its methods JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify() . Although JSON is originally based on a subset of JavaScript, there are boundary cases where JSON

498-459: A byte stream. Primitives as well as non-transient, non-static referenced objects are encoded into the stream. Each object that is referenced by the serialized object via a field that is not marked as transient must also be serialized; and if any object in the complete graph of non-transient object references is not serializable, then serialization will fail. The developer can influence this behavior by marking objects as transient, or by redefining

581-457: A class serializable needs to be a deliberate design decision and not a default condition. Lastly, serialization allows access to non- transient private members of a class that are not otherwise accessible. Classes containing sensitive information (for example, a password) should not be serializable nor externalizable. The standard encoding method uses a recursive graph-based translation of the object's class descriptor and serializable fields into

664-458: A class — __sleep() and __wakeup()  — that are called from within serialize() and unserialize() , respectively, that can clean up and restore an object. For example, it may be desirable to close a database connection on serialization and restore the connection on deserialization; this functionality would be handled in these two magic methods. They also permit the object to pick which properties are serialized. Since PHP 5.1, there

747-571: A computer running on a different hardware architecture should be able to reliably reconstruct a serialized data stream, regardless of endianness . This means that the simpler and faster procedure of directly copying the memory layout of the data structure cannot work reliably for all architectures. Serializing the data structure in an architecture-independent format means preventing the problems of byte ordering , memory layout, or simply different ways of representing data structures in different programming languages . Inherent to any serialization scheme

830-468: A connection or a raw vector. REBOL will serialize to file ( save/all ) or to a string! ( mold/all ). Strings and files can be deserialized using the polymorphic load function. RProtoBuf provides cross-language data serialization in R, using Protocol Buffers . Ruby includes the standard module Marshal with 2 methods dump and load , akin to the standard Unix utilities dump and restore . These methods serialize to

913-416: A data structure from a series of bytes, is deserialization , (also called unserialization or unmarshalling ). In networking equipment hardware, the part that is responsible for serialization and deserialization is commonly called SerDes . Uses of serialization include: For some of these features to be useful, architecture independence must be maintained. For example, for maximal use of distribution,

SECTION 10

#1733085295011

996-439: A data structure, transformed by another program, then possibly executed or written out, such as in a read–eval–print loop . Not all readers/writers support cyclic, recursive or shared structures. .NET has several serializers designed by Microsoft . There are also many serializers by third parties. More than a dozen serializers are discussed and tested here . and here OCaml 's standard library provides marshalling through

1079-626: A data type tags, support for cyclic data structures, indentation-sensitive syntax, and multiple forms of scalar data quoting. YAML is an open format. Property lists are used for serialization by NeXTSTEP , GNUstep , macOS , and iOS frameworks . Property list , or p-list for short, doesn't refer to a single serialization format but instead several different variants, some human-readable and one binary. For large volume scientific datasets, such as satellite data and output of numerical climate, weather, or ocean models, specific binary serialization standards have been developed, e.g. HDF , netCDF and

1162-491: A human readable form using the storeOn: / readFrom: protocol. The storeOn: method generates the text of a Smalltalk expression which – when evaluated using readFrom: – recreates the original object. This scheme is special, in that it uses a procedural description of the object, not the data itself. It is therefore very flexible, allowing for classes to define more compact representations. However, in its original form, it does not handle cyclic data structures or preserve

1245-593: A list of arrays would be printed by (print foo) . Similarly an object can be read from a stream named s by (read s) . These two parts of the Lisp implementation are called the Printer and the Reader. The output of " print " is human readable; it uses lists demarked by parentheses, for example: ( 4 2.9 "x" y ) . In many types of Lisp, including Common Lisp , the printer cannot represent every type of data because it

1328-419: A live object back: the serialized object is transformed into an internal data structure, i.e., a live object within the target runtime. It usually corresponds to the exact inverse process of marshalling, although sometimes both ends of the process trigger specific business logic. The accurate definition of marshalling differs across programming languages such as Python , Java , and .NET , and in some contexts,

1411-653: A method), because executable code in functions cannot be transmitted across different programs. (There is a flag to marshal the code position of a function but it can only be unmarshalled in exactly the same program). The standard marshalling functions can preserve sharing and handle cyclic data, which can be configured by a flag. Several Perl modules available from CPAN provide serialization mechanisms, including Storable , JSON::XS and FreezeThaw . Storable includes functions to serialize and deserialize Perl data structures to and from files or Perl scalars. In addition to serializing directly to files, Storable includes

1494-587: A more complex, non-linear storage organization. Even on a single machine, primitive pointer objects are too fragile to save because the objects to which they point may be reloaded to a different location in memory. To deal with this, the serialization process includes a step called unswizzling or pointer unswizzling , where direct pointer references are converted to references based on name or position. The deserialization process includes an inverse step called pointer swizzling . Since both serializing and deserializing can be driven from common code (for example,

1577-427: A semantically identical clone of the original object. For many complex objects, such as those that make extensive use of references , this process is not straightforward. Serialization of objects does not include any of their associated methods with which they were previously linked. This process of serializing an object is also called marshalling an object in some situations. The opposite operation, extracting

1660-967: A serialized object created in Squeak Smalltalk cannot be restored in Ambrai Smalltalk . Consequently, various applications that do work on multiple Smalltalk implementations that rely on object serialization cannot share data between these different implementations. These applications include the MinneStore object database and some RPC packages. A solution to this problem is SIXX, which is a package for multiple Smalltalks that uses an XML -based format for serialization. The Swift standard library provides two protocols, Encodable and Decodable (composed together as Codable ), which allow instances of conforming types to be serialized to or deserialized from JSON , property lists , or other formats. Default implementations of these protocols can be generated by

1743-418: A serialized state. For example, a Thread object is tied to the state of the current JVM . There is no context in which a deserialized Thread object would maintain useful semantics. Secondly, the serialized state of an object forms part of its class' compatibility contract. Maintaining compatibility between versions of serializable classes requires additional effort and consideration. Therefore, making

SECTION 20

#1733085295011

1826-440: A so-called "binary-object storage framework", which support serialization into and retrieval from a compact binary form. Both handle cyclic, recursive and shared structures, storage/retrieval of class and metaclass info and include mechanisms for "on the fly" object migration (i.e. to convert instances which were written by an older version of a class with a different object layout). The APIs are similar (storeBinary/readBinary), but

1909-546: A specific type of "serialization" in the Python standard library – storing internal python objects: The marshal module exists mainly to support reading and writing the “pseudo-compiled” code for Python modules of .pyc files. … If you’re serializing and de-serializing Python objects, use the pickle module instead In the Java -related RFC   2713 , marshalling is used when serializing objects for remote invocation . An object that

1992-436: Is a lightweight plain-text alternative to XML, and is also commonly used for client-server communication in web applications. JSON is based on JavaScript syntax , but is independent of JavaScript and supported in many other programming languages. JSON is an open format, standardized as STD 90 ( RFC   8259 ), ECMA-404 , and ISO/IEC 21778:2017 . YAML is a strict superset of JSON and includes additional features such as

2075-447: Is a member of the Read type class defines a function that will extract the data from the string representation of the dumped data. The Show type class, in turn, contains the show function from which a string representation of the object can be generated. The programmer need not define the functions explicitly—merely declaring a type to be deriving Read or deriving Show, or both, can make

2158-467: Is an object-oriented serialization mechanism for objects, the Serializable interface. Prolog 's term structure, which is the only data structure of the language, can be serialized out through the built-in predicate write_term/3 and serialized-in through the built-in predicates read/1 and read_term/2 . The resulting stream is uncompressed text (in some encoding determined by configuration of

2241-462: Is fully integrated with its IDE . The component's contents are saved to a DFM file and reloaded on-the-fly. Go natively supports unmarshalling/marshalling of JSON and XML data. There are also third-party modules that support YAML and Protocol Buffers . Go also supports Gobs . In Haskell, serialization is supported for types that are members of the Read and Show type classes . Every type that

2324-476: Is generally used in the receiver end of the implementations of Remote Method Invocation (RMI) and Remote procedure call (RPC) mechanisms to unmarshal transmitted objects in an executable form. JAXB or Java Architecture for XML Binding is the most common framework used by developers to marshal and unmarshal Java objects. JAXB provides for the interconversion between fundamental data types supported by Java and standard XML schema data types. XmlSerializer

2407-455: Is globally declared, these methods utilize the JAXBContext's mapping of XML root elements to JAXB mapped classes to initiate the unmarshalling. If the mappings are not sufficient and the root elements are declared locally, the unmarshal methods use declaredType methods for the unmarshalling process. These two approaches can be understood below. The unmarshal method uses JAXBContext to unmarshal

2490-407: Is like serialization, except marshalling also records codebases. Marshalling is different from serialization in that marshalling treats remote objects specially. … Any object whose methods can be invoked [on an object in another Java virtual machine] must implement the java.rmi.Remote interface. When such an object is invoked, its arguments are marshalled and sent from the local virtual machine to

2573-524: Is marshalled records the state of the original object and it contains the codebase ( codebase here refers to a list of URLs where the object code can be loaded from, and not source code). Hence, in order to convert the object state and codebase(s), unmarshalling must be done. The unmarshaller interface automatically converts the marshalled data containing codebase(s) into an executable Java object in JAXB. Any object that can be deserialized can be unmarshalled. However,

SWIG - Misplaced Pages Continue

2656-471: Is necessary to transport data between processes and/or between threads . In Microsoft's Component Object Model (COM), interface pointers must be marshalled when crossing COM apartment boundaries. In the .NET Framework , the conversion between an unmanaged type and a CLR type, as in the P/Invoke process, is also an example of an action that requires marshalling to take place. Additionally, marshalling

2739-555: Is not clear how to do so. In Common Lisp for example the printer cannot print CLOS objects. Instead the programmer may write a method on the generic function print-object , this will be invoked when the object is printed. This is somewhat similar to the method used in Ruby. Lisp code itself is written in the syntax of the reader, called read syntax. Most languages use separate and different parsers to deal with code and data, Lisp only uses one. A file containing lisp code may be read into memory as

2822-485: Is not valid JavaScript. Specifically, JSON allows the Unicode line terminators U+2028 LINE SEPARATOR and U+2029 PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR to appear unescaped in quoted strings, while ECMAScript 2018 and older does not. See the main article on JSON . Julia implements serialization through the serialize() / deserialize() modules, intended to work within the same version of Julia, and/or instance of

2905-542: Is one such format and means of transferring data between systems. Microsoft, for example, uses it as the basis of the file formats of the various components (Word, Excel, Access, PowerPoint, etc.) of the Microsoft Office suite (see Office Open XML ). While this typically results in a verbose wire format, XML's fully-bracketed "start-tag", "end-tag" syntax allows provision of more accurate diagnostics and easier recovery from transmission or disk errors. In addition, because

2988-423: Is similar to or synonymous with serialization , although technically serialization is one step in the process of marshalling an object. Marshalling and serialization might thus be done differently, although some form of serialization is usually used to do marshalling. The term deserialization is somewhat similar to un -marshalling a dry object "on the server side", i.e., demarshalling (or unmarshalling) to get

3071-462: Is that, because the encoding of the data is by definition serial, extracting one part of the serialized data structure requires that the entire object be read from start to end, and reconstructed. In many applications, this linearity is an asset, because it enables simple, common I/O interfaces to be utilized to hold and pass on the state of an object. In applications where higher performance is an issue, it can make sense to expend more effort to deal with

3154-424: Is the framework used by C# developers to marshal and unmarshal C# objects. One of the advantages of C# over Java is that C# natively supports marshalling due to the inclusion of XmlSerializer class. Java, on the other hand requires a non-native glue code in the form of JAXB to support marshalling. An example of unmarshalling is the conversion of an XML representation of an object to the default representation of

3237-466: Is the process of transforming the memory representation of an object into a data format suitable for storage or transmission , especially between different runtimes . It is typically used when data must be moved between different parts of a computer program or from one program to another. Marshalling simplifies complex communications, because it allows using composite objects instead of being restricted to primitive objects . Marshalling

3320-431: Is the process of translating a data structure or object state into a format that can be stored (e.g. files in secondary storage devices , data buffers in primary storage devices) or transmitted (e.g. data streams over computer networks ) and reconstructed later (possibly in a different computer environment). When the resulting series of bits is reread according to the serialization format, it can be used to create

3403-634: Is used extensively within scripts and applications that use the XPCOM technologies provided within the Mozilla application framework . The Mozilla Firefox browser is a popular application built with this framework, that additionally allows scripting languages to use XPCOM through XPConnect (Cross-Platform Connect). In the Microsoft Windows family of operating systems the entire set of device drivers for Direct3D are kernel-mode drivers. The user-mode portion of

SWIG - Misplaced Pages Continue

3486-399: Is used interchangeably with serialization. To " serialize " an object means to convert its state into a byte stream in such a way that the byte stream may be converted back into a copy of the object, which is unmarshalling in essence. Different programming languages either make or don’t make the distinction between the two concepts. A few examples: In Python , the term "marshal" is used for

3569-553: Is useful in the programming of user interfaces whose contents are time-varying — graphical objects can be created, removed, altered, or made to handle input events without necessarily having to write separate code to do those things. Serialization breaks the opacity of an abstract data type by potentially exposing private implementation details. Trivial implementations which serialize all data members may violate encapsulation . To discourage competitors from making compatible products, publishers of proprietary software often keep

3652-524: The Marshal module and the Pervasives functions output_value and input_value . While OCaml programming is statically type-checked, uses of the Marshal module may break type guarantees, as there is no way to check whether an unmarshalled stream represents objects of the expected type. In OCaml it is difficult to marshal a function or a data structure which contains a function (e.g. an object which contains

3735-538: The freeze function to return a serialized copy of the data packed into a scalar, and thaw to deserialize such a scalar. This is useful for sending a complex data structure over a network socket or storing it in a database. When serializing structures with Storable , there are network safe functions that always store their data in a format that is readable on any computer at a small cost of speed. These functions are named nstore , nfreeze , etc. There are no "n" functions for deserializing these structures —

3818-588: The API is handled by the DirectX runtime provided by Microsoft. This is an issue because calling kernel-mode operations from user-mode requires performing a system call , and this inevitably forces the CPU to switch to "kernel mode". This is a slow operation, taking on the order of microseconds to complete. During this time, the CPU is unable to perform any operations. As such, minimizing

3901-583: The Boost Framework , the S11n framework, and Cereal. MFC framework (Microsoft) also provides serialization methodology as part of its Document-View architecture. CFML allows data structures to be serialized to WDDX with the <cfwddx> tag and to JSON with the SerializeJSON() function. Delphi provides a built-in mechanism for serialization of components (also called persistent objects), which

3984-542: The Serialize function in Microsoft Foundation Classes ), it is possible for the common code to do both at the same time, and thus, 1) detect differences between the objects being serialized and their prior copies, and 2) provide the input for the next such detection. It is not necessary to actually build the prior copy because differences can be detected on the fly, a technique called differential execution. This

4067-606: The University of Utah and while on the faculty at the University of Chicago . Development is currently supported by an active group of volunteers led by William Fulton. SWIG has been released under a GNU General Public License . SWIG was a successful participant of Google Summer of Code in 2008, 2009, 2012. In 2008, SWIG got four slots. Haoyu Bai spent his summers on SWIG's Python 3.0 Backend, Jan Jezabek worked on Support for generating COM wrappers, Cheryl Foil spent her time on Comment 'Translator' for SWIG, and Maciej Drwal worked on

4150-558: The External Data Representation (XDR) standard as described in RFC 1014). Finally, it is recommended that an object's __repr__ be evaluable in the right environment, making it a rough match for Common Lisp's print-object . Not all object types can be pickled automatically, especially ones that hold operating system resources like file handles , but users can register custom "reduction" and construction functions to support

4233-510: The GPU's command buffer is full of rendering data, the API could simply store the requested rendering call in a temporary buffer and, when the command buffer is close to being empty, it can perform a switch to kernel-mode and add a number of stored commands all at once. Marshalling data requires some kind of data transfer, which leverages a specific data format to be chosen as the serialization target. XML

SECTION 50

#1733085295011

4316-446: The XML data, when the root element is globally declared. The JAXBContext object always maintains a mapping of the globally declared XML element and its name to a JAXB mapped class. If the XML element name or its @xsi:type attribute matches the JAXB mapped class, the unmarshal method transforms the XML data using the appropriate JAXB mapped class. However, if the XML element name has no match,

4399-439: The accelerated version and falls back to the pure Python version. R has the function dput which writes an ASCII text representation of an R object to a file or connection. A representation can be read from a file using dget . More specific, the function serialize serializes an R object to a connection, the output being a raw vector coded in hexadecimal format. The unserialize function allows to read an object from

4482-494: The built-in data types , as well as plain old data structs , as binary data. As such, it is usually trivial to write custom serialization functions. Moreover, compiler-based solutions, such as the ODB ORM system for C++ and the gSOAP toolkit for C and C++, are capable of automatically producing serialization code with few or no modifications to class declarations. Other popular serialization frameworks are Boost.Serialization from

4565-705: The compiler for types whose stored properties are also Decodable or Encodable . PowerShell implements serialization through the built-in cmdlet Export-CliXML . Export-CliXML serializes .NET objects and stores the resulting XML in a file. To reconstitute the objects, use the Import-CliXML cmdlet, which generates a deserialized object from the XML in the exported file. Deserialized objects, often known as "property bags" are not live objects; they are snapshots that have properties, but no methods. Two dimensional data structures can also be (de)serialized in CSV format using

4648-530: The compiler generate the appropriate functions for many cases (but not all: function types, for example, cannot automatically derive Show or Read). The auto-generated instance for Show also produces valid source code, so the same Haskell value can be generated by running the code produced by show in, for example, a Haskell interpreter. For more efficient serialization, there are haskell libraries that allow high-speed serialization in binary format, e.g. binary . Java provides automatic serialization which requires that

4731-401: The converse need not be true. To "marshal" an object means to record its state and codebase(s) in such a way that when the marshalled object is "unmarshalled," a copy of the original object is obtained, possibly by automatically loading the class definitions of the object. You can marshal any object that is serializable or remote (that is, implements the java.rmi.Remote interface). Marshalling

4814-504: The corresponding manual pages for SWI-Prolog, SICStus Prolog, GNU Prolog. Whether and how serialized terms received over the network are checked against a specification (after deserialization from the character stream has happened) is left to the implementer. Prolog's built-in Definite Clause Grammars can be applied at that stage. The core general serialization mechanism is the pickle standard library module, alluding to

4897-803: The database systems term pickling to describe data serialization ( unpickling for deserializing ). Pickle uses a simple stack -based virtual machine that records the instructions used to reconstruct the object. It is a cross-version customisable but unsafe (not secure against erroneous or malicious data) serialization format. Malformed or maliciously constructed data, may cause the deserializer to import arbitrary modules and instantiate any object. The standard library also includes modules serializing to standard data formats: json (with built-in support for basic scalar and collection types and able to support arbitrary types via encoding and decoding hooks ). plistlib (with support for both binary and XML property list formats). xdrlib (with support for

4980-612: The details of their programs' serialization formats a trade secret . Some deliberately obfuscate or even encrypt the serialized data. Yet, interoperability requires that applications be able to understand each other's serialization formats. Therefore, remote method call architectures such as CORBA define their serialization formats in detail. Many institutions, such as archives and libraries, attempt to future proof their backup archives—in particular, database dumps —by storing them in some relatively human-readable serialized format. The Xerox Network Systems Courier technology in

5063-456: The disadvantage of losing the more compact, byte-stream-based encoding, but by this point larger storage and transmission capacities made file size less of a concern than in the early days of computing. In the 2000s, XML was often used for asynchronous transfer of structured data between client and server in Ajax web applications. XML is an open format, and standardized as a W3C recommendation . JSON

SECTION 60

#1733085295011

5146-638: The early 1980s influenced the first widely adopted standard. Sun Microsystems published the External Data Representation (XDR) in 1987. XDR is an open format , and standardized as STD 67 (RFC 4506). In the late 1990s, a push to provide an alternative to the standard serialization protocols started: XML , an SGML subset, was used to produce a human-readable text-based encoding . Such an encoding can be useful for persistent objects that may be read and understood by humans, or communicated to other systems regardless of programming language. It has

5229-530: The encoding details are different, making these two formats incompatible. However, the Smalltalk/X code is open source and free and can be loaded into other Smalltalks to allow for cross-dialect object interchange. Object serialization is not part of the ANSI Smalltalk specification. As a result, the code to serialize an object varies by Smalltalk implementation. The resulting binary data also varies. For instance,

5312-642: The identity of shared references (i.e. two references a single object will be restored as references to two equal, but not identical copies). For this, various portable and non-portable alternatives exist. Some of them are specific to a particular Smalltalk implementation or class library. There are several ways in Squeak Smalltalk to serialize and store objects. The easiest and most used are storeOn:/readFrom: and binary storage formats based on SmartRefStream serializers. In addition, bundled objects can be stored and retrieved using ImageSegments . Both provide

5395-514: The mapping. However, if the @xsi:type attribute of the XML data has a mapping to an appropriate JAXB class, then this takes precedence over declaredType parameter. The unmarshal methods by declaredType parameters always return a JAXBElement<declaredType> instance. The properties of this JAXBElement instance are set as follows: Serialization In computing, serialization (or serialisation , also referred to as pickling in Python )

5478-444: The number of times this switching operation must be performed would optimize performance to a substantive degree. Linux OpenGL drivers are split in two: a kernel-driver and a user-space driver. The user-space driver does all the translation of OpenGL commands into machine code to be submitted to the GPU . To reduce the number of system calls, the user-space driver implements marshalling. If

5561-415: The object be marked by implementing the java.io.Serializable interface . Implementing the interface marks the class as "okay to serialize", and Java then handles serialization internally. There are no serialization methods defined on the Serializable interface, but a serializable class can optionally define methods with certain special names and signatures that if defined, will be called as part of

5644-424: The object in any programming language. Consider the following class: Unmarshalling is the process of converting the XML representation of Code Snippet 1 to the default executable Java representation of Code Snippet 2, and running that very code to get a consistent, live object back. Had a different format been chosen, the unmarshalling process would have been different, but the end result in the target runtime would be

5727-595: The older GRIB . Several object-oriented programming languages directly support object serialization (or object archival ), either by syntactic sugar elements or providing a standard interface for doing so. The languages which do so include Ruby , Smalltalk , Python , PHP , Objective-C , Delphi , Java , and the .NET family of languages. There are also libraries available that add serialization support to languages that lack native support for it. C and C++ do not provide serialization as any sort of high-level construct, but both languages support writing any of

5810-465: The pickling and unpickling of arbitrary types. Pickle was originally implemented as the pure Python pickle module, but, in versions of Python prior to 3.0, the cPickle module (also a built-in) offers improved performance (up to 1000 times faster ). The cPickle was adapted from the Unladen Swallow project. In Python 3, users should always import the standard version, which attempts to import

5893-556: The programmer manually. SWIG wraps simple C declarations by creating an interface that closely matches the way in which the declarations would be used in a C program. For example, consider the following interface file: In this file, there are two functions sin() and strcmp() , a global variable Foo , and two constants STATUS and VERSION . When SWIG creates an extension module, these declarations are accessible as scripting language functions, variables, and constants respectively. In Python: There are two main reasons to embed

5976-505: The project. Leif Middelschulte worked on a C target language module. Swati Sharma enhanced the Objective-C module. Neha Narang added the new module on JavaScript. Dmitry Kabak worked on source code documentation and Doxygen comments. For Python, similar functionality is offered by SIP , Pybind11, and Boost's Boost.python library . Marshalling (computer science) In computer science , marshalling or marshaling ( US spelling )

6059-519: The regular thaw and retrieve deserialize structures serialized with the " n " functions and their machine-specific equivalents. PHP originally implemented serialization through the built-in serialize() and unserialize() functions. PHP can serialize any of its data types except resources (file pointers, sockets, etc.). The built-in unserialize() function is often dangerous when used on completely untrusted data. For objects, there are two " magic methods" that can be implemented within

6142-421: The remote one, where the arguments are unmarshalled and used. In .NET , marshalling is also used to refer to serialization when using remote calls : When you marshal an object by value, a copy of the object is created and serialized to the server. Any method calls made on that object are done on the server Marshalling is used within implementations of different remote procedure call (RPC) mechanisms, where it

6225-449: The same system image. The HDF5.jl package offers a more stable alternative, using a documented format and common library with wrappers for different languages, while the default serialization format is suggested to have been designed rather with maximal performance for network communication in mind. Generally a Lisp data structure can be serialized with the functions " read " and " print ". A variable foo containing, for example,

6308-468: The same. The process of unmarshalling XML data into an executable Java object is taken care of by the in-built Unmarshaller class. The unmarshal methods defined in the Unmarshaller class are overloaded to accept XML from different types of input such as a File, FileInputStream, or URL. For example: Unmarshal methods can deserialize an entire XML document or a small part of it. When the XML root element

6391-539: The serialization for an object so that some portion of the reference graph is truncated and not serialized. Java does not use constructor to serialize objects. It is possible to serialize Java objects through JDBC and store them into a database. While Swing components do implement the Serializable interface, they are not guaranteed to be portable between different versions of the Java Virtual Machine. As such,

6474-573: The serialization/deserialization process. The language also allows the developer to override the serialization process more thoroughly by implementing another interface, the Externalizable interface, which includes two special methods that are used to save and restore the object's state. There are three primary reasons why objects are not serializable by default and must implement the Serializable interface to access Java's serialization mechanism. Firstly, not all objects capture useful semantics in

6557-488: The standard class String , that is, they effectively become a sequence of bytes. Some objects cannot be serialized (doing so would raise a TypeError exception): bindings, procedure objects, instances of class IO, singleton objects and interfaces. If a class requires custom serialization (for example, it requires certain cleanup actions done on dumping / restoring), it can be done by implementing 2 methods: _dump and _load . The instance method _dump should return

6640-478: The tags occur repeatedly, one can use standard compression methods to shrink the content—all the Office file formats are created by zipping the raw XML. Alternative formats such as JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) are more concise, but correspondingly less robust for error recovery. Once the data is transferred to a program or an application, it needs to be converted back to an object for usage. Hence, unmarshalling

6723-434: The target programming language. SWIG will generate conversion code for functions with simple arguments; conversion code for complex types of arguments must be written by the programmer. The SWIG tool creates source code that provides the glue between C/C++ and the target language. Depending on the language, this glue comes in two forms: SWIG is not used for calling interpreted functions by native code; this must be done by

6806-624: The target stream), with any free variables in the term represented by placeholder variable names. The predicate write_term/3 is standardized in the ISO Specification for Prolog (ISO/IEC 13211-1) on pages 59 ff. ("Writing a term, § 7.10.5"). Therefore it is expected that terms serialized-out by one implementation can be serialized-in by another without ambiguity or surprises. In practice, implementation-specific extensions (e.g. SWI-Prolog's dictionaries) may use non-standard term structures, so interoperability may break in edge cases. As examples, see

6889-410: The unmarshal process will abort and throw an UnmarshalException . This can be avoided by using the unmarshal by declaredType methods. When the root element is not declared globally, the application assists the unmarshaller by application-provided mapping using declaredType parameters. By an order of precedence, even if the root name has a mapping to an appropriate JAXB class, the declaredType overrides

#10989