Misplaced Pages

#867132

94-472: Price can be quoted in currency, quantities of goods or vouchers. In many financial transactions, it is customary to quote prices in other ways. The most obvious example is in pricing a loan, when the cost will be expressed as the percentage rate of interest. The total amount of interest payable depends upon credit risk, the loan amount and the period of the loan. Other examples can be found in pricing financial derivatives and other financial assets. For instance

188-436: A production function is often assumed, for example, where Q is output, A is factor representing technology, K is the sum of the value of capital goods, and L is the labor input. The price of the homogeneous output is taken as the numéraire , so that the value of each capital good is taken as homogeneous with output. Different types of labor are assumed reduced to a common unit, usually unskilled labor. Both inputs have

282-408: A raw material or a similar economic good is for sale at multiple locations, the law of one price is generally believed to hold. This essentially states that the cost difference between the locations cannot be greater than that representing shipping, taxes, other distribution costs and more.money According to Milton Friedman , price has five functions in a free-enterprise exchange economy which

376-576: A "profit", by definition, it is the case that many nonprofits may desire to maximize net revenue —total revenue less total cost—for various programs and activities, such as selling seats to theatrical and cultural performances. The price of an item is also called the "price point", especially if it refers to stores that set a limited number of price points. For example, Dollar General is a general store or " five and dime " store that sets price points only at even amounts, such as exactly one, two, three, five, or ten dollars (among others). Other stores have

470-401: A Cobb–Douglas production function for the economy as a whole (with K and L being the sum of all of the different sectoral values). In short, for the sum of Cobb–Douglas production functions to equal a Cobb–Douglas, the production functions for all of the different sectors have to have the same values of A and a . Reswitching means that there is no simple (monotonic) relationship between

564-447: A barrel of oil at -$ 37.63 a barrel, a one-day drop of $ 55.90, or 306%, according to Dow Jones Market Data. "Negative prices means someone with a long position in oil would have to pay someone to take that oil off of their hands. Why would they do that? The main reason is a fear that if forced to take delivery of crude on the expiration of the May oil contract , there would be nowhere to put it as

658-446: A collection of a large number of heterogeneous workplaces. This vision produces a core proposition in textbook neoclassical economics , i.e., that the income earned by each " factor of production " (essentially, labor and "capital") is equal to its marginal product. Thus, with perfect product and input markets, the wage (divided by the price of the product) is alleged to equal the marginal physical product of labor. More importantly for

752-423: A cost of production; see, e.g., Ison and Wall, 2007, p. 181). The polluted waters or polluted air also created as part of the process of producing the car is an external cost borne by those who are affected by the pollution or who value unpolluted air or water. Because the manufacturer does not pay for this external cost (the cost of emitting undesirable waste into the commons), and does not include this cost in

846-534: A different model of growth. In their approach, the warranted rate of growth is brought into equality with the natural rate of growth by adjustments to income distribution. Although Kaldor and Pasinetti, for example, differed in how to justify this, the rate of profits is the quotient of the rate of growth and the ratio of the savings rate out of profits. This equation is known as the Cambridge equation. Investment, as in Keynes,

940-420: A factor of production, including other factors than capital, may be associated with a higher, not lower price, of that factor. According to the Cambridge, England, critics, this analysis is thus a serious challenge, particularly in factor markets , to the neoclassical vision of prices as indices of scarcity and the simple neoclassical version of the principle of substitution . A different way to understand

1034-431: A general inflation or deflation that changes both prices by the same percentage: the exact result depends on the relative "capital intensity" of the two sectors. This result is not changed by the fact that for both items, the capital cost per unit would change as the two prices change (contrary to the assumption made above). Nor does it change if the wage rate and labor cost per unit ( W ) change. Also, an obvious riposte

SECTION 10

#1733086226868

1128-508: A glut of crude fills up available storage." In a sense the price is still positive, just the direction of payment reverses, i.e. in this case you are paid to take some goods . Negative interest rates are a similar concept. One solution offered to the paradox of the value is through the theory of marginal utility proposed by Carl Menger , one of the founders of the Austrian School of economics. As William Barber put it, human volition,

1222-476: A good or service. For example, if demand for a good increases and supply of the good is held constant, the price for the good will rise in a marketplace with open competition. Under the UK's Sale of Goods Act 1979 , damages for non-delivery of contracted goods take account of the market price for the goods where there is an available market. On restaurant menus , the market price (often abbreviated to m.p. or mp )

1316-583: A market. In particular, it only partially reflects the scarcity of the means of production relative to their demand. While the prices of different types of means of production are prices, the rate of profit can be seen in Marxian terms, as reflecting the social and economic power that owning the means of production gives this minority to exploit the majority of workers and to receive profit . But not all followers of Sraffa interpret his theory of production and capital in this Marxian way. Nor do all Marxists embrace

1410-412: A mathematical model of growth whereby the natural rate of growth fulfills two important functions. First, it sets the ceiling to the divergence between the actual growth rate and warranted growth rate and turns cyclical growth into slumps . Consequently, it is important for generating cyclical behavior in trade-cycle models that rely on first-order difference equations . Second, it ostensibly provides

1504-450: A physical measure of capital intensity . Instead of simply taking a neoclassical production function for granted, Samuelson follows the Sraffian tradition of constructing a production function from positing alternative methods to produce a product. The posited methods exhibit different mixes of inputs. Samuelson shows how profit maximizing (cost minimizing) indicates the best way of producing

1598-410: A policy of setting most of their prices ending in 99 cents or pence. Other stores (such as dollar stores , pound stores, euro stores, 100- yen stores, and so forth) only have a single price point ($ 1, £1, €1, ¥100), but in some cases, that price may purchase more than one of some very small items. The term " price point " is also used to describe non-linear areas of the price curve. In economics ,

1692-514: A positive impact on output, with diminishing marginal returns . In some more complicated general equilibrium models developed by the neoclassical school, labor and capital are assumed to be heterogeneous and measured in physical units. In most versions of neoclassical growth theory (for example, in the Solow growth model), however, the function is assumed to apply to the entire economy . This view portrays an economy as one big factory rather than as

1786-399: A pricing system which allows the purchaser to choose a price to pay based on their circumstances and the benefit which the goods or services provide for them. Producer Price Index : this index measures the average change in the selling price of domestic producers' products over time. Purchase Price: It refers to the amount paid by the purchaser for receiving a unit of goods or services at

1880-774: A profit, the hope is that price will exceed cost of production so that the organization can see financial gain from the transaction. Finally, while pricing is a topic central to a company's profitability, pricing decisions are not limited to for-profit companies. The behavior of non-profit organizations , such as charities, educational institutions and industry trade groups, also involves setting prices. For instance, charities seeking to raise money may set different "target" levels for donations that reward donors with increases in status (e.g., name in newsletter), gifts or other benefits; likewise educational and cultural nonprofits often price seats for events in theatres, auditoriums and stadiums. Furthermore, while nonprofit organizations may not earn

1974-404: A sum of dated labor from different years. A machine produced in the year 2000 can then be treated as the labor and commodity inputs used to produce it in 1999 (multiplied by the rate of profit); and the commodity inputs in 1999 can be further reduced to the labor inputs that made them in 1998 plus the commodity inputs (multiplied by the rate of profit again); and so on until the non-labor component

SECTION 20

#1733086226868

2068-452: Is "deserved" in some moral or normative sense. Some members of the Marxian school argue that even if the means of production "earned" a return based on their marginal product, that does not imply that their owners (i.e., the capitalists ) created the marginal product and should be rewarded. In the Sraffian view, the rate of profit is not a price, and it is not clear that it is determined in

2162-490: Is assumed to be exogenously given: Growth is dependent on exogenous variables , such as population growth , technological improvement , and growth in natural resources . Classical theory claims that an increase in either of the factors of production, i.e. labor or capital , while holding the other constant and assuming no technological change, will increase output but at a diminishing rate that will eventually approach zero. The so-called natural rate of economic growth

2256-450: Is characterized by private ownership of the means of production: The paradox of value was observed and debated by classical economists . Adam Smith described what is now called the diamond – water paradox : diamonds command a higher price than water, yet water is essential for life and diamonds are merely ornamentation. Use value was supposed to give some measure of usefulness, later refined as marginal benefit while exchange value

2350-469: Is circularity in the argument. A falling profit rate has a direct effect on the amount of capital; it does not simply cause greater employment of it. In very simple terms, suppose that capital currently consists of 10 trucks and 5 lasers. Trucks are produced and sold for $ 50,000 each, while each laser goes for $ 30,000. Thus, the value of our capital equals the sum of (price)*(quantity) = 10*$ 50,000 + 5*$ 30,000 = $ 650,000 = K . As noted, this K can change if

2444-419: Is commonly confused with the notion of cost of production, as in "I paid a high cost for buying my new plasma television"; but technically these are different concepts. Price is what a buyer pays to acquire products from a seller. Cost of production concerns the seller's expenses (e.g., manufacturing expense) in producing the product being exchanged with a buyer. For marketing organizations seeking to make

2538-490: Is defined as the sum of the growth of the labor force and the growth of labor productivity . The concept of the natural rate of growth first appeared in Roy Harrod 's 1939 article where it is defined as the "maximum rate of growth allowed by the increase of population, accumulation of capital, technological improvement and the work/ leisure preference schedule, supposing that there is always full employment in some sense." If

2632-564: Is determined by the equation: Here, A is a constant (representing technology and the like), K is supposed to represent the stock of capital goods (assumed to be measurable), and L is the amount of labor input. The coefficient a is supposed to represent the technology for this sector i . (Its subscript is left out for convenience.) The problem is that unless we impose very strong mathematical restrictions, we cannot say that this Cobb–Douglas production function for sector i plus one for sector j (plus that for sector k , etc.) adds up to

2726-435: Is divided into three broad categories: Non-manufacturing costs are those costs that are not directly incurred in manufacturing a product . Examples of such costs are salary of sales personnel and advertising expenses. Generally, non-manufacturing costs are further classified into two categories: A defensive cost is an environmental expenditure to eliminate or prevent environmental damage. Defensive costs form part of

2820-770: Is done in both business and government. Costs are often underestimated, resulting in cost overrun during execution. Cost-plus pricing is where the price equals cost plus a percentage of overhead or profit margin. In business economics , the profitability of a trade or sales prospect relies on the ability of an enterprise to sustain market prices that cover all costs and leave a surplus for owner interest, as expressed by: Profit = Revenues – Costs {\displaystyle {\text{Profit = Revenues – Costs}}} Manufacturing costs are those costs that are directly involved in manufacturing of products. Examples of manufacturing costs include raw materials costs and charges related to workers. Manufacturing cost

2914-433: Is heterogeneous and cannot be added up the way that financial capital can. For the latter, all units are measured in money terms and can thus be easily summed. Even then, of course, the price of a sum of financial capital varies with interest rates. Sraffa suggested an aggregation technique (stemming in part from Marxian economics ) by which a measure of the amount of capital could be produced: by reducing all machines to

Price - Misplaced Pages Continue

3008-401: Is not one, single, full-employment growth path, and that, in many countries, demand constraints (related to excessive inflation and balance of payments difficulties) tend to arise long before supply constraints are ever reached. Roy Harrod, in his seminal paper, developed a model, subsequently refined by Russian-born Evsey Domar , that aims to explain an economy's growth rate in terms of

3102-487: Is taken as an independent variable, and savings adjust to investment. The Harrod–Domar model's lack of a mechanism that could bring the warranted rate of growth into line with the natural rate of growth triggered the growth debate in the mid-1950s, a debate that "engaged some of the greatest minds in the economics profession for over two decades." The neoclassical and Neo-Keynesian sides were represented by Paul Samuelson , Robert Solow , and Franco Modigliani , who taught at

3196-446: Is that we can aggregate capital simply by using the first set of prices and ignoring the second, as with many inflation corrections. This does not work, however, because the variation of the rate of profit is theorized as happening at a specific point in time in purely mathematical terms rather than as part of an historical process. The point is that if neoclassical conceptions do not work at a specific time ( statics ), they cannot handle

3290-413: Is the value of money that has been used up to produce something or deliver a service, and hence is not available for use anymore. In business, the cost may be one of acquisition, in which case the amount of money expended to acquire it is counted as cost. In this case, money is the input that is gone in order to acquire the thing. This acquisition cost may be the sum of the cost of production as incurred by

3384-432: Is the value of the best alternative that was not chosen in order to pursue the current endeavor—i.e., what could have been accomplished with the resources expended in the undertaking. It represents opportunities forgone. In theoretical economics, cost used without qualification often means opportunity cost. When a transaction takes place, it typically involves both private costs and external costs. Private costs are

3478-540: Is written instead of a specific price, meaning "price of dish depends on market price of ingredients, and price is available upon request", and is particularly used for seafood , notably lobsters and oysters . Basic Price : It is the amount that producer receive from buyer for a unit of good or service produced minus any taxes payable and plus subsidies payable on that unit as the result of its production or sales. It does not include any producer transport charges which are involved separately. Pay What You Decide (PWYD):

3572-673: The MIT , in Cambridge, Massachusetts , US, while the Keynesian and Post-Keynesian sides were represented by Nicholas Kaldor , Joan Robinson , Luigi Pasinetti , Piero Sraffa , and Richard Kahn , who mostly taught at the University of Cambridge in England . The common name of the two places gave rise to the terms "the two Cambridges debate" or "the Cambridge capital controversy." Both camps generally treated

3666-411: The capital controversy initiated by Piero Sraffa revealed that most of the foundational tenets of the marginalist theory of value either reduced to tautologies , or that the theory was true only if counter-factual conditions applied. One insight often ignored in the debates about price theory is something that businessmen are keenly aware of: in different markets, prices may not function according to

3760-425: The genuine progress indicator (GPI) calculations. Labour costs would include travel time, holiday pay, training costs, working clothes, social insurance, taxes on employment &c. Path cost is a term in networking to define the worthiness of a path, see Routing . Capital controversy The Cambridge capital controversy , sometimes called " the capital controversy " or " the two Cambridges debate ",

3854-407: The market price is the economic price for which a good or service is offered in the marketplace . It is of interest mainly in the study of microeconomics . Market value and market price are equal only under conditions of market efficiency , equilibrium , and rational expectations . Market price is measured during a specific period of time and is greatly affected by the supply and demand for

Price - Misplaced Pages Continue

3948-522: The rate of profit (associated with falling wages) will lead to more of that factor being used in production. The law of diminishing marginal returns implies that greater use of this input will imply a lower marginal product, all else equal : since a firm is getting less from adding a unit of capital goods than is received from the previous one, the rate of profit must increase to encourage the employment of that extra unit, assuming profit maximization . Piero Sraffa and Joan Robinson , whose work set off

4042-408: The Cambridge controversy, pointed out that there was an inherent measurement problem in applying this model of income distribution to capital. Capitalist income (total profit or property income) is defined as the rate of profit multiplied by the amount of capital, but the measurement of the "amount of capital" involves adding up quite incomparable physical objects – adding the number of trucks to

4136-554: The Harrod–Domar model, in particular pointing out instability in its solution, and, by the late 1950s, they started an academic dialogue that led to the development of the Solow–Swan model . The model was developed separately and independently by Robert Solow and Trevor Swan in 1956, in response to the supposedly Keynesian Harrod–Domar model . Solow and Swan proposed an economic model of long-run economic growth set within

4230-455: The Polish economist Oskar Lange felt it was necessary to attempt a serious integration of the insights of classical political economy with neo-classical economics. This would then result in a much more realistic theory of price and of real behavior in response to prices. Marginalist theory lacked anything like a theory of the social framework of real market functioning, and criticism sparked off by

4324-552: The Sonnenschein–Mantel–Debreu results as an aggregation problem). Note that this says that it's not simply K that is subject to aggregation problems: so is L . A third way to look this problem is to remember that many neoclassical economists assume that both individual firms (or sectors) and the entire economy fit the Cobb–Douglas production function with constant returns to scale . That is, output of each sector i

4418-452: The Sraffian model: in fact, such authors as Michael Lebowitz and Frank Roosevelt are highly critical of Sraffian interpretations, except as a narrow technical critique of the neoclassical view. There are also Marxian economists, like Michael Albert and Robin Hahnel , who consider the Sraffian theory of prices, wages and profit to be superior to Marx's own theory. In neoclassical economics ,

4512-421: The actual economic growth-rate falls below the natural rate, then the unemployment rate will rise; if it rises above it, the unemployment rate will fall. Consequently, the natural rate of growth must be the rate of growth that keeps the rate of unemployment constant. If the natural rate of growth is not exogenously given, but is endogenous to demand , or to the actual rate of growth, this has two implications. At

4606-567: The actual payment may be called transaction price or traded price. Economic price theory asserts that in a free market economy the market price reflects the interaction between supply and demand : the price is set so as to equate the quantity being supplied and that being demanded. In turn, these quantities are determined by the marginal utility of the asset to different buyers and to different sellers. Supply and demand, and hence price, may be influenced by other factors, such as government subsidy or manipulation through industry collusion. When

4700-459: The aggregation problem does not involve the Classical pricing equations. Think about a decrease in the r , the return on capital (corresponding to a rise in w , the wage rate, given that initial levels of capital and technology stay constant). This causes a change in the distribution of income, the nature of the various capital goods demanded, and thus a change in their prices. This causes a change in

4794-430: The aggregation problems discussed above. In a 1966 article, the famous neoclassical economist Paul A. Samuelson summarizes the reswitching debate: Samuelson gives an example involving both the Sraffian concept of new products made with labor employing capital goods represented by dead or "dated labor" (rather than machines having an independent role) and Böhm-Bawerk's concept of " roundaboutness " — supposedly

SECTION 50

#1733086226868

4888-415: The amount of capital. Further, Sraffa showed that a change in the rate of profit would change the measured amount of capital, and in highly nonlinear ways: an increase in the rate of profit might initially increase the perceived value of the truck more than the laser, but then reverse the effect at still higher rates of profit. See " Reswitching " below. The analysis further implies that a more intensive use of

4982-402: The calculations obvious), then P T = $ 50,000 and P L = $ 30,000, as assumed. As above, K = $ 650,000. Now, suppose that r falls to zero (another extreme case). Then P T = $ 30,000 and P L = $ 20,000, so that the value of the capital equals 10*$ 30,000 + 5*$ 20,000 = $ 400,000. The value of K thus varies with the rate of profit. Note that it does not vary in proportion as with

5076-650: The capital that they advanced for production (with the proportion being determined by the profit rate). Assume that the labor cost per unit equals W in each sector (and does not change). Both r and W are assumed to be equalized between sectors due to competition, i.e., the mobility of capital and labor between sectors. Note that this classical conception of pricing is different from the standard neoclassical "supply and demand" vision. It refers to long-run price determination. It can be reconciled with neoclassical economics by assuming that production follows constant returns to scale . Further, this formulation does not treat

5170-448: The cost of production (capital-cost and labor-costs) plus the average rate of profit . So if the average rate of profit (return on capital investment) is 22% then prices would reflect cost-of-production plus 22%. The perception that there is a transformation problem in Marx stems from the injection of Walrasian equilibrium theory into Marxism where there is no such thing as equilibrium. Price

5264-625: The costs that the buyer of a good or service pays the seller. This can also be described as the costs internal to the firm's production function . External costs (also called externalities), in contrast, are the costs that people other than the buyer are forced to pay as a result of the transaction. The bearers of such costs can be either particular individuals or society at large. Note that external costs are often both non-monetary and problematic to quantify for comparison with monetary values. They include things like pollution, things that society will likely have to pay for in some way or at some time in

5358-486: The creation of an object. This value does not relate to price in a simple manner, and the difficulty of the conversion of the mass of values into the actual prices is known as the transformation problem . However, many recent Marxists deny that any problem exists. Marx was not concerned with proving that prices derive from values. In fact, he admonished the other classical political economists (like Ricardo and Smith) for trying to make this proof. Rather, for Marx, price equals

5452-412: The creation of the capital goods. (Later, John Maynard Keynes and his school argued that saving does not automatically lead to investment in tangible capital goods.) Thus, in this view, profit income is a reward for those who value future income highly and are thus willing to sacrifice current enjoyment. Strictly speaking, however, modern neoclassical theory does not say that capital's or labor's income

5546-520: The debate is mathematical , while some major elements can be explained as part of the aggregation problem . The critique of neoclassical capital theory might be summed up as saying that the theory suffers from the fallacy of composition ; specifically, that we cannot extend microeconomic concepts to production by society as a whole . The resolution of the debate, particularly how broad its implications are, has not been agreed upon by economists. In classical, orthodox economic theory , economic growth

5640-400: The discussion here, the rate of profit (sometimes confused with the rate of interest , i.e., the cost of borrowing funds) is supposed to equal the marginal physical product of capital. (For simplicity, abbreviate "capital goods" as "capital.") A second core proposition is that a change in the price of a factor of production will lead to a change in the use of that factor – an increase in

5734-478: The economy does not expand indefinitely or go into recession . Actual growth is the real rate-increase in a country's yearly GDP . Natural rate of growth is the rate at which the growth an economy requires that full employment is maintained. For example, If the labor force grows at 3 percent per year, with everything else being equal, then to maintain full employment, the economy's annual growth rate must be 3 percent. Neoclassical economists claimed shortcomings in

SECTION 60

#1733086226868

5828-446: The equilibrium rate of profit (which helps to determine the income of the owners of capital goods) as a market price determined by technology and the relative proportions in which the "factors of production" are used in production. Just as wages are the reward for the labor that workers do, profits are the reward for the productive contributions of capital: thus, the normal operations of the system under competitive conditions pay profits to

5922-555: The framework of neoclassical economics . They attempt to explain long-run economic growth by looking at capital accumulation ; labor growth or population growth ; and increases in productivity , commonly referred to as technological progress. At its core, the model offers a neoclassical (aggregate) production function , often specified to be of Cobb–Douglas type, which enables the model "to make contact with microeconomics ". Post-Keynesian economists, such as Nicholas Kaldor, Luigi Pasinetti, Richard Kahn , and Joan Robinson, proposed

6016-400: The future, even so that are not included in transaction prices. Social costs are the sum of private costs and external costs. For example, the manufacturing cost of a car (i.e., the costs of buying inputs, land tax rates for the car plant, overhead costs of running the plant and labor costs) reflects the private cost for the manufacturer (in some ways, normal profit can also be seen as

6110-498: The human subject, was "brought to the centre of the stage" by marginalist economics , as a bargaining tool. Neoclassical economists sought to clarify choices open to producers and consumers in market situations, and thus "fears that cleavages in the economic structure might be unbridgeable could be suppressed". Without denying the applicability of the Austrian theory of value as subjective only, within certain contexts of price behavior,

6204-414: The level of saving and of the productivity of capital . Despite its progenitors' ostensibly Keynesian viewpoint, the Harrod–Domar model was actually the precursor to the exogenous growth model . According to the Harrod–Domar model there are three kinds of growth: the rate of warranted growth; the rate of actual growth; and the natural rate of growth. Warranted growth-rate is the rate of growth at which

6298-524: The maximum attainable long-run rate of growth. The natural rate is treated as strictly exogenous; it is shaped by the growth of the labor force and the growth of labor productivity, without recognition nor assumption that both might be endogenous to demand . Additionally, there was no fiscal or other economic mechanism in the theory that could bring the warranted rate of growth in line with the natural rate of growth, i.e. for society to achieve full or fuller utilization of its resources. The question of whether

6392-413: The money value of all these different capital items to get an aggregate amount of capital (while correcting for inflation's effects). But Sraffa pointed out that this financial measure of the amount of capital is determined partly by the rate of profit. This is a problem because neoclassical theory tells us that this rate of profit is itself supposed to be determined by the amount of capital being used. There

6486-409: The more complicated issues of dynamics . This critique of the neoclassical conception is more of a matter of pointing out its major technical flaws in the theory than of presenting an alternative. In general, this discussion says that the distribution of income (and r ) helps determine the measured amount of capital rather than being solely determined by that amount. It also says that physical capital

6580-580: The natural growth rate is exogenous, or endogenous to demand (and whether it is input growth that causes output growth, or vice versa), lies at the heart of the debate between neoclassical economists and Keynesian / post-Keynesian economists. The latter group argues that growth is primarily demand-driven because growth in the labor force as well as in labor productivity both respond to the pressure of demand, both domestic and foreign. Their view does not mean, post-Keynesians state, that demand growth determines supply growth without limit; rather, they claim that there

6674-465: The natural rate of growth as given. Virtually all the focus of the debate centered on the potential mechanisms by which the warranted growth rate might be made to converge on the natural rate, giving a long-run, equilibrium growth-path. The American Cambridge side focused on adjustments to the capital/output ratio through capital-labour substitution if capital and labour were growing at different rates. The English Cambridge side concentrated on adjustments to

6768-450: The nature of the techniques of production used and the rate of profit. For example, we may see a situation in which a technique of production is cost-minimizing at low and high rates of profits, but another technique is cost-minimizing at intermediate rates. Reswitching implies the possibility of capital reversing , an association between high interest rates (or rates of profit) and more capital-intensive techniques. Thus, reswitching implies

6862-408: The number of lasers, for example. That is, just as one cannot add heterogeneous "apples and oranges," we cannot simply add up simple units of "capital." As Robinson argued, there is no such thing as "leets," an inherent element of each capital good that can be added up independent of the prices of those goods. Neoclassical economists assumed that there was no real problem here. They said: just add up

6956-415: The original producer, and further costs of transaction as incurred by the acquirer over and above the price paid to the producer. Usually, the price also includes a mark-up for profit over the cost of production. More generalized in the field of economics , cost is a metric that is totaling up as a result of a process or as a differential for the result of a decision . Hence cost is the metric used in

7050-467: The output, given an externally specified wage or profit rate. Samuelson ends up rejecting his previously held view that heterogeneous capital could be treated as a single capital good, homogeneous with the consumption good, through a "surrogate production function". Consider Samuelson's Böhm-Bawerkian approach. In his example, there are two techniques, A and B , that use labor at different times ( –1 , –2 , and –3 , representing years in

7144-562: The owners of capital. Responding to the "indictment that hangs over society" that it involves "exploiting labor," Clark wrote: It is the purpose of this work [his 1899 'Distribution of Wealth'] to show that the distribution of the income of society is controlled by a natural law, and that this law, if it worked without friction, would give to every agent of production the amount of wealth which that agent creates. However wages may be adjusted by bargains freely made between individual men [i.e., without labor unions and other "market imperfections"],

7238-413: The price of inflation-linked government securities in several countries is quoted as the actual price divided by a factor representing inflation since the security was issued. "Price" sometimes refers to the quantity of payment requested by a seller of goods or services, rather than the eventual payment amount. In business this requested amount is often referred to as the offer price or selling price, while

7332-549: The price of the car (a Kaldor–Hicks compensation ), they are said to be external to the market pricing mechanism. The air pollution from driving the car is also an externality produced by the car user in the process of using his good. The driver does not compensate for the environmental damage caused by using the car. When developing a business plan for a new or existing company, product or project, planners typically make cost estimates in order to assess whether revenues /benefits will cover costs (see cost–benefit analysis ). This

7426-525: The pricing formula above. As in the real world, the capital intensity of production (capital cost per unit) differs between the sectors producing the different types of capital goods. Suppose that it takes twice as much capital per unit of output to produce trucks than it does to produce lasers, so that the capital cost per unit equals $ 20,000 for trucks (T) and $ 10,000 for lasers (L), where these coefficients are initially assumed not to change. Then, If W = $ 10,000 and r = 1 = 100% (an extreme case used to make

7520-471: The rate of profit as exogenously given. That is because the whole neoclassical theory of profit-rate determination is being questioned: if we can go from the marginal product of capital to the profit rate, we should be able to go from the profit rate to the marginal product. In any event, few if any participants in the Cambridge Controversy attacked the Sraffian critique on these grounds. Go back to

7614-417: The rate of profit as a price determined by supply and demand. Rather, it fits more with neoclassical conceptions of "normal" profits . These refer to the basic profits that the owners of capital must receive in order to stay in business in their sector. Third, while neoclassical economics assumes that the "normal" rate of profit is determined by aggregate production (as discussed above), this formulation takes

7708-417: The rate of profit rises. To see this, define the price of production for the two types of capital goods. For each item, follow the type of pricing rule used by Classical economics for produced items, where price is determined by explicit costs of production: Here, P is the price of an item and r is the rate of profit. Assume that the owners of the factories are rewarded by receiving income proportional to

7802-451: The rates of pay that result from such transactions tend, it is here claimed, to equal that part of the product of industry which is traceable to the labor itself; and however interest [i.e., profit] may be adjusted by similarly free bargaining, it naturally tends to equal the fractional product that is separately traceable to capital. These profits are in turn seen as rewards for saving, i.e., abstinence from current consumption, which leads to

7896-415: The rejection of a simple (monotonic) non-increasing relationship between capital intensity and the rate of profit , sometimes referred to as the rate of interest . As rates fall, for example, profit-seeking businesses can switch from using one set of techniques ( A ) to another ( B ) and then back to A . This problem arises for either a macroeconomic or a microeconomic production process and so goes beyond

7990-437: The same principles except in some very abstract (and therefore not very useful) sense. From the classical political economists to Michał Kalecki it was known that prices for industrial goods behaved differently from prices for agricultural goods, but this idea could be extended further to other broad classes of goods and services. Marxists assert that value derives from the volume of socially necessary labour time exerted in

8084-415: The saving ratio through changes in the distribution of income between wages and profits, on the assumption that the propensity to save out of profits is higher than out of wages. Much of the emotion behind the debate arose because the technical criticisms of marginal productivity theory were connected to wider arguments with ideological implications. The famous neoclassical economist John Bates Clark saw

8178-535: The standard modeling paradigm applied to economic processes . Costs (pl.) are often further described based on their timing or their applicability. In accounting, costs are the monetary value of expenditures for supplies, services, labor, products, equipment and other items purchased for use by a business or other accounting entity. It is the amount denoted on invoices as the price and recorded in book keeping records as an expense or asset cost basis . Opportunity cost , also referred to as economic cost

8272-575: The theoretical level, there are implications for the efficiency and speed of the adjustment process between the warranted and the natural rates of growth in Harrod's growth model. Also, there are implications for the way the growth process should be viewed, and for understanding why growth rates differ between countries: whether growth is viewed as supply determined ; or whether growth is viewed as demand determined ; or determined by constraints on demand before supply constraints begin to operate. Harrod produced

8366-440: The time and place required by the purchaser and any deductible taxes will not be included. The purchase price also include any transport charge for purchase to pick up the goods to a specific location in the required time. Price optimization is the use of mathematical techniques by a company to determine how customers will respond to different prices for its products and services through different channels. Cost Cost

8460-631: The value of K (as discussed above). So, again, the rate of return on K (i.e., r ) is not independent of the measure of K , as assumed in the neoclassical model of growth and distribution. Causation goes both ways, from K to r and from r to K . This problem is sometimes seen as analogous to the Sonnenschein–Mantel–Debreu results (e.g., by Mas-Colell 1989) in general equilibrium theory , which shows that representative agent models cannot be theoretically justified, except under restrictive conditions (see Kirman, 1992 for an explanation of

8554-400: Was a dispute between proponents of two differing theoretical and mathematical positions in economics that started in the 1950s and lasted well into the 1960s. The debate concerned the nature and role of capital goods and a critique of the neoclassical vision of aggregate production and distribution. The name arises from the location of the principals involved in the controversy: the debate

8648-594: Was largely between economists such as Joan Robinson and Piero Sraffa at the University of Cambridge in England and economists such as Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology , in Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. The English side is most often labeled " post-Keynesian ", while some call it " neo-Ricardian ", and the Massachusetts side " neoclassical ". Most of

8742-413: Was reduced to a negligible (but non-zero) amount. Then you could add up the dated labor value of a truck to the dated labor value of a laser. However, Sraffa then pointed out that this accurate measuring technique still involved the rate of profit: the amount of capital depended on the rate of profit. This reversed the direction of causality that neoclassical economics assumed between the rate of profit and

8836-484: Was the measure of how much one good was in terms of another, namely what is now called relative price . Negative prices are very unusual but possible under certain circumstances. Effectively, the owner or producer of an item pays the "buyer" to take it off their hands. In April 2020, for the first time in history, due to the global health/economic crisis situation, the price of West Texas Intermediate benchmark crude oil for May delivery contracts turned negative, with

#867132