Misplaced Pages

#723276

30-693: The Philippines–United States Visiting Forces Agreement , sometimes the PH–US Visiting Forces Agreement , is a bilateral visiting forces agreement between the Philippines and the United States consisting of two separate documents. The first of these documents is commonly referred to as "the VFA" or "VFA-1", and the second as "VFA-2" or "the Counterpart Agreement". A visiting forces agreement

60-449: A Philippine court, which convicted one of the accused and acquitted the others. The political issue of VFAs is complicated by the fact that many host countries have mixed feelings about foreign troops on their soil, and demands to renegotiate the VFA are often combined with calls for foreign troops to leave entirely. Issues of different national customs can arise. Many U.S. observers, for example, feel that host country justice systems grant

90-535: A more enhanced, mutually beneficial, mutually agreeable, and more effective and lasting arrangement on how to move forward in our mutual defense". In a speech on February 12, 2021, President Duterte addressed himself to the US on this saying, "I would like to put on notice if there's an American agent here that from now on, you want the Visiting Forces Agreement done? Well, you have to pay". He went on to say, "It's

120-463: A much weaker set of protections to the accused than the U.S. and that host country courts can be subject to popular pressure to deliver a guilty verdict; furthermore, that American servicemembers ordered to a foreign posting should not be forced to give up the rights they are afforded under the United States Bill of Rights . On the other hand, host country observers having no local counterpart to

150-840: A second class within its polity , and as an informal category, second-class citizenship is not objectively measured, but cases such as the Southern United States under racial segregation and Jim Crow laws , the repression of Aboriginal citizens in Australia prior to 1967, deported ethnic groups designated as "special settlers" in the Soviet Union , the apartheid regime in South Africa , women in Saudi Arabia under Saudi Sharia law, and Roman Catholics in Northern Ireland during

180-410: A second-class citizen. This does not mean that they do not have any legal protections, nor do they lack acceptance by the local population, but they lack many of the civil rights commonly given to the dominant social group. A naturalized citizen, on the other hand essentially carries the same rights and responsibilities as any other citizen, except for possible exclusion from certain public offices, and

210-518: A shared responsibility but your share of responsibility does not come free because after all when the war breaks out, we all pay," Foreign Affairs Secretary Teodoro Locsin had said a few days earlier that the Philippines and the US would soon meet to "iron out whatever differences we have", declining to elaborate further. Duterte's statement was criticized by Senator Panfilo Lacson and Vice President Leni Robredo over "extortion" remark. On February 13,

240-443: Is a person who is systematically and actively discriminated against within a state or other political jurisdiction , despite their nominal status as a citizen or a legal resident there. While not necessarily slaves , outlaws , illegal immigrants , or criminals , second-class citizens have significantly limited legal rights, civil rights and socioeconomic opportunities, and are often subject to mistreatment and exploitation at

270-604: Is a version of a status of forces agreement that only applies to troops temporarily in a country. The agreements came into force on May 27, 1999, upon ratification by the Senate of the Philippines . The United States government regards these documents to be executive agreements not requiring approval by the United States Senate . The primary effect of the agreement is that it allows the US government to retain jurisdiction over US military personnel accused of committing crimes in

300-448: Is especially true when the incidents involve severe crimes, such as robbery , murder , manslaughter or sex crimes , especially when the charge is defined differently between the two nations. For example, in 2005 in the Philippines , four U.S. Marines were charged with raping a local woman with whom they had been drinking. As the incident had no connection with the military duties of the accused, they were tried under Philippine law in

330-482: The Parliamentary era are all examples of groups that have been historically described as having second-class citizenry and being victims of state-sponsored discrimination. Historically, before the mid-20th century, this policy was applied by several European colonial empires on colonial residents of overseas possessions. A resident alien or foreign national , and children in general, fit most definitions of

SECTION 10

#1732859495724

360-530: The Supreme Court of the Philippines , sitting en banc . The second challenge, Suzette Nicolas y Sombilon Vs. Alberto Romulo, et al. / Jovito R. Salonga, et al. Vs. Daniel Smith, et al. / Bagong Alyansang Makabayan, et al. Vs. President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, et al. submitted on January 2, 2007, was decided on February 11, 2009, again by the Supreme Court sitting en banc. In deciding this second challenge,

390-568: The Bill of Rights often feel that this is an irrelevant excuse for demanding special treatment, and resembles the extraterritorial agreements demanded by Western countries during the colonial era. One host country where such sentiment is widespread, South Korea, itself has forces in Kyrgyzstan and has negotiated a SOFA that confers total immunity to its servicemembers from prosecution by Kyrgyz authorities for any crime whatsoever, something far in excess of

420-621: The Philippines, except in cases of special interest to the US Departments of State or Defense . Waiving of jurisdiction in the US is complicated because the United States is a federation of US states and therefore a federation of jurisdictions. The agreement contains various procedural safeguards to protect rights to due process and proscribe double jeopardy . The agreement also exempts Philippine personnel from visa formalities and guarantees expedited entry and exit processing; requires

450-443: The Philippines, unless the crimes are "of particular importance to the Philippines". This means that for crimes without this significance, the US can refuse to detain or arrest accused personnel, or may instead prosecute them under US jurisdiction. Under the Visiting Forces Agreement, the local courts have one year to complete any legal proceedings. The agreement also exempts US military personnel from visa and passport regulations in

480-730: The Philippines. The agreement contains various procedural safeguards which amongst other things establish the right to due process and proscribe double jeopardy . The Agreement also prevents US military personnel from being tried in Filipino religious or military courts ; requires both governments to waive any claims concerning loss of materials (though it does require that the US honor contractual arrangements and comply with US law regarding payment of just and reasonable compensation in settlement of meritorious claims for damage, loss, personal injury or death, caused by acts or omissions of United States personnel); exempts material exported and imported by

510-441: The US to accept Philippine drivers licenses; allows Philippine personnel to carry arms at US military installations while on duty; provides personal tax exemptions and import/export duty exclusions for Philippine personnel; requires the US to provide health care to Philippine personnel; and exempts Philippine vehicles, vessels, and aircraft from landing or ports fees, navigation or overflight charges, road tolls or any other charges for

540-466: The VFA, and respondent Secretary of Foreign Affairs is hereby ordered to forthwith negotiate with the United States representatives for the appropriate agreement on detention facilities under Philippine authorities as provided in Art. V, Sec. 10 of the VFA, pending which the status quo shall be maintained until further orders by this Court." UP professor Harry Roque, counsel for former senator Jovito Salonga, one of

570-482: The VFA. However, the agreement was not changed. A second Philippine court case under the VFA is the one following the death of Jennifer Laude , also involving a US Navy ship docked at Subic Bay. This case happened after the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement was signed. The constitutionality of the VFA was challenged twice. The case Bayan v. Zamora was dismissed on October 10, 2000, by

600-473: The agreement is one-sided, prejudicial, and contrary to the sovereignty of the Philippines. The agreement has been characterized as granting immunity from prosecution to US military personnel who commit crimes against Filipinos, and as treating Filipinos as second class citizens in their own country. As a result of these issues, in 2006, some members of the Philippine Congress considered terminating

630-590: The court ruled 9–4 (with two justices inhibiting) that, "The Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) between the Republic of the Philippines and the United States, entered into on February 10, 1998, is UPHELD as constitutional, ...". The decision continued, specifically relating to matters relevant to the Subic Rape Case, "... the Romulo-Kenney Agreements of December 19 and 22, 2006 are DECLARED not in accordance with

SECTION 20

#1732859495724

660-487: The forces will be determined and paid. Criminal issues vary, but the typical provision in U.S. VFAs is that U.S. military courts will have jurisdiction over crimes committed either by a servicemember against another servicemember or by a servicemember as part of his or her military duty, but the host nation retains jurisdiction over other crimes. In many host nations, the VFA can become a major political issue following crimes allegedly committed by visiting service members. This

690-404: The hands of their putative superiors. Systems with de facto second-class citizenry are widely regarded as violating human rights . Typical conditions facing second-class citizens include but are not limited to: The category is normally unofficial and mostly academic, and the term itself is generally used as a pejorative by commentators. Governments will typically deny the existence of

720-458: The international news magazine The Diplomat published a podcast episode discussing the matter. On July 30, 2021, President Duterte ordered the reinstatement of the agreement. Visiting forces agreement While the United States military has the largest foreign presence and therefore accounts for most VFAs, other countries having troops temporarily serving abroad negotiate VFAs with states where they serve. VFAs are intended to clarify

750-501: The military from duties or taxes; and allows unrestricted movement of U.S. vessels and aircraft in the Philippines. The primary effect of the agreement is to require the US government to notify Philippine authorities when it becomes aware of the apprehension, arrest or detention of any Philippine personnel visiting the US and, when so requested by the Philippine government, to ask the appropriate authorities to waive jurisdiction in favor of

780-718: The past shown admiration for both the Russian Armed Forces , as well as the Chinese People's Liberation Army , despite the fact that the Philippines and China are embroiled in a dispute in the South China Sea regarding sovereignty over the Spratly Islands . In June 2020, the Philippine government reversed this decision and announced that it would maintain the agreement. In November, 2020, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte ordered an extra six months "To enable us to find

810-518: The petitioners in the case, said in a phone interview regarding the decision on the constitutionality of the VFA. "We will appeal, ... We are hoping we could convince the other justices to join the four dissenters." On February 11, 2020, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte formally announced to the United States embassy in Manila that he was ending the pact, with termination to take effect in 180 days unless agreed otherwise during that time. Duterte has in

840-435: The privileges many South Koreans object to in their nation's SOFA with the U.S. To many U.S. observers, the fact that most accused criminals eventually end up being tried in a local court and found guilty proves that the system is working; to some host country observers, it reinforces the perception that the VFA protects the guilty and makes the exceptions more glaring. Second class citizen A second-class citizen

870-473: The terms under which foreign military is allowed to operate. Typically, a VFA is mainly concerned with the legal issues associated with military individuals and property. This may include issues like entry and exit into the country, tax liabilities, postal services, or employment terms for host-country nationals, but the most contentious issues are civil and criminal jurisdiction over the visiting forces. For civil matters, VFAs provide for how civil damages caused by

900-487: The use of US military installations. The US has at least twice used the agreement to keep accused military personnel under US jurisdiction. On January 18, 2006, the US military maintained custody of four troops accused of rape while visiting Subic Bay during their trial by a Philippine court. They were held by American officials at the United States Embassy in Manila . This led to protests by those who believe that

#723276