Misplaced Pages

National Pediatric Research Network Act of 2013

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

National Pediatric Research Network Act of 2013 ( H.R. 225 ) is a bill in the 113th United States Congress on February 4, 2013. It passed the United States House of Representatives and was sent to the Senate , where it was referred to the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions .

#331668

33-496: The purpose of the bill is "to amend title IV of the Public Health Service Act to provide for a National Pediatric Research Network, including with respect to pediatric rare diseases or conditions." The bill has received some support for researchers in the area of pediatric health who support the bill's goal of facilitating research, although there are some concerns about avoiding the creation of government red tape . In

66-478: A case to stay in the U.S. before an immigration judge. Most migrants subject to the orders were returned to Mexico within hours. Trump advisor Stephen Miller had a role in shaping the policy, and has since defended it in interviews. In November 2020, a federal court ordered a halt to the practice in regard to unaccompanied minor children; on January 29, 2021, the stay was lifted by DC Circuit Court of Appeals , allowing minors to be expelled pending its review of

99-536: A legal port of entry or if they passed through other countries first without seeking asylum. This policy has contributed to a decline in both 'gotaways' and border encounters as those who are apprehended are subject to stricter rules upon removal from the United States if they were to attempt to reenter. Title 42 of the United States Code , Chapter 6A, Subchapter II, Part G, Section 265 states: The provision

132-431: A letter to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas calling on him to end the practice. In the letter, they argued that Mayorkas should employ alternative forms of humanitarian relief for detainees subject to deportation for the remainder of the pandemic. More criminals were allowed to enter the United States due to the overwhelming number of border crossings fueled by Title 42, with repeat migrants who did not face

165-502: A program to send migrants to cities controlled by Democrats , such as Los Angeles , Chicago , Denver , and Washington, D.C. Title 42 , which resulted in many repeat attempts from people expelled, led to illegal border crossings at record levels between 2021 and 2023, averaging around 2 million people per year, as well as an increase in 'gotaways' which dropped to a record low rate after Title 42 expired. This drop in gotaways allows border patrol to apprehend more criminals and make

198-468: Is a United States federal law enacted in 1944. The full act is codified in Title 42 of the United States Code (The Public Health and Welfare), Chapter 6A ( Public Health Service ). This Act provided a legislative basis for the provision of public health services in the United States. The Public Health Service Act clearly established the federal government 's quarantine authority for the first time. It gave

231-506: The 112th United States Congress a previous version of the Bill passed twice, one as a stand-alone bill and one as part of a larger piece of legislation. Neither version was adopted because they did not make it out of the Senate. The Bill was introduced on January 14, 2013 by Rep. Lois Capps (D-CA) . She was joined by Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) and four other original cosponsors. The Bill

264-720: The Administrative Procedure Act , noting that the policy was an "arbitrary and capricious" violation of the Act. The ruling required the United States government to process all asylum seekers under immigration law as previous to Title 42's implementation, and Sullivan specifically called out the CDC for intentionally ignoring the negative effects of implementing Title 42 and not considering alternative approaches to expulsion such as vaccination, outdoor processing, and allowing asylum seekers to quarantine with U.S. relatives. Sullivan opined that

297-477: The American Immigration Council . These groups argue that the policy allows the United States to illegally expel asylum seekers without any legal process. In February 2021, more than 60 congresspeople, led by Congresswoman Frederica S. Wilson , House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Gregory W. Meeks , Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal , and Homeland Security Committee Chair Bennie G. Thompson , sent

330-676: The United States Public Health Service responsibility for preventing the introduction, transmission and spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the United States. The Public Health Service Act granted the original authority for scientists and special consultants to be appointed "without regard to the civil-service laws", known as a Title 42 appointment . During COVID-19 pandemic , section 42 U.S.C.   § 265 has been used for Title 42 expulsion . It has since been amended many times. Some of these amendments are: Other attempted amendments to

363-1048: The United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions . The Bill would amend the Public Health Service Act to authorize the Director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), in carrying out the Pediatric Research Initiative, to establish a National Pediatric Research Network. The bill authorizes the Director of the NIH to award funding to public or private nonprofit groups that those groups can use to plan, establish, or improve pediatric research consortia. The money can also be used to provide basic operating support for those consortia, including doing actual clinical research and training other researchers. The awards should go to 20 or fewer consortia. The Bill goes into greater specifics about

SECTION 10

#1732868761332

396-561: The Biden administration announced plans to strengthen the number of troops stationed at the U.S.–Mexico border. U.S. cities expected to receive some of these migrants once they crossed the border. New York City said it was receiving 500 cases a day and expected that number to rise after Title 42 expired on May 11. The Texas cities of Brownsville, Laredo , and El Paso declared a state of emergency in anticipation of more migrants. Texas governor Greg Abbott also announced that Texas would resume

429-408: The Biden administration introduced an unprecedented streamlined program for any Ukrainian nationals who pass various checks and are sponsored by various organizations under the "Uniting for Ukraine" program to be exempted from Title 42 and get humanitarian parole and work permits. In October 2022, it introduced a similar program for Venezuelan nationals, who must arrive by air. The number of Venezuelans

462-549: The Mexican government announced that it would stop accepting non-Mexican family units with minor children returned to Mexico under Title 42. In June 2021, it was reported that the Biden administration had been considering rescinding Title 42. However, in September 2021, NPR reported that the administration had defended Title 42 expulsion in court under the pretext of slowing the spread of COVID-19. In December 2021, Anne Schuchat ,

495-459: The act have been proposed but failed: Since the passage of the Act, health services in the US subsequently have been marked by a history of underinvestment that has undermined the public health workforce and support for population health. Title 42 expulsion A Title 42 expulsion is the removal by the U.S. government of a person who had recently been in a country where a communicable disease

528-642: The border more secure. In fiscal year 2023, CBP figures showed that 169 people on the United States’ terrorist watch list were arrested at the border, compared to 98 in the previous fiscal year and 15 in 2021. In the year after Title 42 ended, the Biden administration deported more people than in any year since 2010. Title 42 has been criticized by several human rights groups including the American Civil Liberties Union , Amnesty International USA , Human Rights Watch , Human Rights First , and

561-452: The case. In February 2021, Mexico stopped accepting families with children under the program. Physicians for Human Rights noted that the policy had been applied unfairly against migrants and asylees and that its stated purpose of containing the spread of COVID-19 was dubious as the U.S. continued to allow millions of people to cross the US–Mexico border weekly. In early February 2021,

594-403: The characteristics of these consortia and the rules they must agree to follow in order to get the funding. The bill indicates that this support will be for five years, with the option of a renewal. The bill also requires the Director of the NIH to ensure that some of the awards go to consortia that will focus primarily on pediatric rare diseases of conditions and their treatment. It also requires

627-454: The creation of a data coordinating center to help network different doctors, hospitals, and clinics so that their research can be pooled. The bill also includes a variety of reporting requirements and established a requirement that the consortia cooperate with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to track patients. Public Health Service Act The Public Health Service Act

660-476: The decision by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. On December 27, the Supreme Court granted a stay against Sullivan's decision with a 5–4 split. The case, Arizona v. Mayorkas , was set for oral argument, though it was about whether the states were allowed to intervene, rather than the merits of the policy. The Biden administration lifted the order authorizing Title 42 on May 11, 2023, when the federal government ended

693-531: The entry of persons who potentially pose a health risk by being subject to previously announced travel restrictions or by unlawfully entering the country to bypass health-screening measures. Persons subject to the order are not held in congregate areas for processing and are instead immediately expelled to their country of last transit. If they are unable to be returned to the country of last transit (because that country will not accept them due to their nationality), CBP will work with its interagency partners to expel

SECTION 20

#1732868761332

726-609: The implementation of a vaccine program to get migrants vaccinated at the border, the policy was not scheduled to officially end until May 23, 2022. On May 20, federal judge for the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana , Robert R. Summerhays , issued a ruling blocking the CDC from ending Title 42 expulsions. That same month, in response to the Russian invasion of Ukraine two months earlier,

759-505: The number of migrants crossing the border increased. To mitigate the potential surge in border crossings following the end of Title 42, the federal government implemented new rules for incoming migrants at the US-Mexico border. These new rules bar from the United States those who attempt to enter illegally for five years if they do not qualify for asylum. The new rule also presumes that migrants are ineligible for asylum if they did not arrive at

792-511: The official national emergency on COVID-19. Senators Thom Tillis and Kyrsten Sinema in May 2023 introduced a bill to extend Title 42, but it was never was voted on. The House of Representatives also passed a Republican -led bill to improve border security following the end of Title 42, but it failed in the Senate . In order to mitigate any potential increase in migrants due to the end of this policy,

825-497: The person to their country of origin. In some cases, this is not possible, and migrants may be expelled to a third country that will accept them based on previous residency. Expulsions under Title 42 are not based on immigration status and are tracked separately from immigration. At the discretion of the presidential administration, Title 42 can be used even for people who would normally have temporary protected status based on their country of origin. The CDC's policy under Title 42

858-453: The policy had no rational basis as COVID-19 was already widespread throughout the U.S. when the program was initiated. The ruling was celebrated by the ACLU , a plaintiff in the case. In response to the ruling, a group of states seeking to keep the policy in place appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court , and on December 19, 2022, Chief Justice John Roberts temporarily maintained Title 42 and stayed

891-537: The second-highest official at the CDC, testified that the expulsions of migrants under Title 42 lacked a sufficient public health rationale. In March 2022, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Biden administration could continue to swiftly remove migrant families under Title 42, but "only to places where they will not be persecuted or tortured." On April 1, 2022, the CDC officially announced they would end Title 42 expulsions. However, in order to allow for

924-461: Was capped at 24,000, and those arriving by crossing into Mexico or Panama illegally would start to be expelled under Title 42. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch criticized the latter aspect of the plan. On November 15, 2022, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia , Emmet G. Sullivan , ruled that expulsions under Title 42 were a violation of

957-497: Was enacted as part of the Public Health Service Act of 1944. In March 2020, the Center for Disease Control under the Trump administration issued a public health order allowing for the rapid expulsion of unauthorized border crossers and asylum seekers, citing COVID-19 concerns. As it is considered an "expulsion" rather than a "deportation", the migrants were not afforded the right to make

990-500: Was present. The extent of authority for contagion-related expulsions is set out by law in 42 U.S.C.   § 265 . During the COVID-19 pandemic , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) under the Trump administration used this provision to generally block land entry for many migrants. This practice was initially continued by the Biden administration before the program

1023-640: Was referred to the United States House Committee on Energy and Commerce . It was reported out of Committee on February 4, 2013. The Bill was passed by the House on February 4, 2013 by a vote of 375-27. It was considered under a suspension of the rules, something which typically only happens in the case of noncontroversial bills. After being passed by the House, the Bill was received by the United States Senate on February 7, 2013 and referred to

National Pediatric Research Network Act of 2013 - Misplaced Pages Continue

1056-469: Was terminated with the end of the COVID-19 national emergency on May 12, 2023. Title 42 of the United States Code includes numerous sections dealing with public health , social welfare , and civil rights , but, in the context of immigration , the phrase "Title 42" came to be used to refer specifically to expulsions under section 265. The program allows U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to prohibit

1089-410: Was unenforceable from November 15, 2022, when D.C. federal judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled that the policy is a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act , until December 19 when the chief justice of the United States , John Roberts , issued a temporary hold on Sullivan's ruling, followed by the full court in a 5–4 vote on December 27. In the days preceding the policy's repeal on May 11, 2023,

#331668