Misplaced Pages

#109890

14-505: Before the 2017 Administrative Reform , the village belonged to Kohtla Parish . In the 13th century on the site of Kohtla there was Odre village with the size of 18 carucates . Kohtla Manor ( Kochtel ) was first mentioned in 1419. From 1750 to 1919 it belonged to the von Stackelberg  [ de ] . The building was burned down in 1941 during World War II . Chess grandmaster Lembit Oll (1966–1999) originated from Kohtla-Vanaküla. This Ida-Viru County location article

28-530: Is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . 2017 Administrative Reform in Estonia Administrative reform in Estonia ( Estonian : Eesti omavalitsuste haldusreform ) was administrative reform which took place in 2017 and resulting in new administrative units in Estonia. In general, old units incorporated voluntarily, but in some cases incorporations were forced by state powers. After

42-528: The administrative reform was completed in 2017. The manifesto of the second Taavi Rõivas cabinet which took office in April 2015 mentioned the government's intention to carry out an administrative reform. With the administrative reform bill approved by the government in March 2016, the government set a criterion according to which the lower limit of the population of municipalities had to be 5,000 inhabitants when adopting

56-409: The law although aiming to reach municipalities with at least 11,000 inhabitants. The goal of the administrative reform, which was written into the administrative reform law, was the increase in the capacity of local governments, as their capacity was different in terms of their financial potential, the number of officials and the provision of services. The broader goal of the 2017 administrative reform

70-403: The local government unit that received the proposal were as follows: The national government had the obligation to take into account the possible impact on the living conditions of the residents, the quality of public services, administrative capacity, the demographic situation, the organization of transport and communication, the business environment, the state of education and the functioning of

84-459: The municipal governments argued violated the autonomy of the local governments and constitutional guarantees. The court came to the conclusion that administrative organization is not a matter for local governments but rather a matter for the state so the state was to have broad competence to decide what the administrative organization should be in the country with local governments having the right to be heard but not refuse to join another entity should

98-432: The municipality as a single service area. It was also necessary to take into account the historical justification and the sense of belonging of the inhabitants. In the case of local government units that do not meet the minimum size, i.e. less than 5,000 inhabitants, the national government may apply an exception and not require forced merger, should this not have a negative impact on the aforementioned circumstances and one of

112-527: The opinion of the local government unit, terminate the procedure for changing the administrative territorial organization or decide to change the administrative territorial organization of the local government units with its own regulation, if the reasons given in the opinion were not sufficient in the opinion of the national government. Compulsory mergers were initiated for those local government units that had less than 5,000 inhabitants as of 1 January 2017 and to which exceptions could not be applied. The tasks of

126-462: The reform, there are 79 administrative units (before 2017 there were 213): 15 urban and 64 rural municipalities. 185 municipalities merged to form 51 new ones, and 28 municipalities did not merge. In the course of the administrative reform, the names of many villages were changed (most of them in Saare County and Võru County ) due to the same municipality being unable to have several villages with

140-603: The same name. In total, 50 villages had their names changed and 9 villages disappeared completely after merging with another village. Due to political considerations and strong opposition from municipalities, the reform could not be carried out in this form earlier. However, since 2004, the state had been offering merger support to municipalities. As a result of that, several municipalities had therefore already previously merged on their own initiative. For example, from 1997 to 2008, 47 local governments merged into twenty local government units. A more active accession started in 2015 and

154-407: The state decide so. On 15 February 2017, the national government made merger proposals to local governments that had not merged on their own initiative. If the local government unit did not submit an opinion on the merger proposal of by 15 May 2017, the proposal was considered accepted. If the local government unit objected to the proposal, the national government could, based on the reasons given in

SECTION 10

#1732905973110

168-569: The territoriality of self-governing units. On June 7, 2016, the Riigikogu adopted the Law on Administrative Reform. 56 MPs voted in favor of the law with 38 against. The Administrative Reform Act and the unconstitutionality of its individual sections were contested in the Supreme Court by several municipal governments with the controversial part being the forced operation of the administrative reform which

182-403: Was mainly on the transformation of local governments, but county governments were to also benefit from the reform. The desired results of the reform were to achieve an increase in the role of municipal governments in the organization of social life, the growth of municipal governments' competence, the strengthening of local representative and participatory democracy and the integrity and logic of

196-424: Was to develop and change local governments in a way that would enable them to provide better services to residents, be regionally competitive among local governments, and perform statutory duties independently. The aforementioned included the increase in the management of local government units and the greater ability of the local government to direct the development of its region. The focus of the administrative reform

#109890