Misplaced Pages

#41958

35-506: It appears in several psychological theories. For instance it is a facet of neuroticism in the NEO PI , and forms part of personal construct psychology , developed by George Kelly . For hunter gatherers, every stranger from outside the small tribal group was a potential source of hostility. Similarly, in archaic Greece, every community was in a state of hostility, latent or overt, with every other community - something only gradually tempered by

70-476: A collection of unidimensional, polar scales. In contrast, circumplex models explore personality as it is constructed in the two-dimensional space created by the intersections of these polar scales. Timothy Leary was the first to apply the circumplex to the study of personality. Following Leary's pioneering work in the 1950s, Jerry Wiggins ' Interpersonal Circle was one of the most influential early circumplex models of personality. Despite similarities between

105-496: A consideration of the external factors outside of the self. As the focus becomes more relaxed (but still prominent as it is a main part of the theory) research expands. Both the EPQ and Big Five approaches extensively use self-report questionnaires. The factors are intended to be orthogonal (uncorrelated), though there are often small positive correlations between factors. The five factor model in particular has been criticized for losing

140-499: A parallel to Leon Festinger 's view that there is an inherent impulse to reduce cognitive dissonance . While challenging reality can be a useful part of life, and persistence in the face of failure can be a valuable trait (for instance in invention or discovery ), in the case of hostility it is argued that evidence is not being accurately assessed but rather forced into a Procrustean mould in order to maintain one's belief systems and avoid having one's identity challenged. Instead it

175-494: A person either has or does not have. In other traits, such as extraversion vs. introversion , each person is judged to lie along a spectrum. Trait theory suggests that some natural behaviours may give someone an advantage in a position of leadership. There are two approaches to define traits: as internal causal properties or as purely descriptive summaries. The internal causal definition states that traits influence our behaviours, leading us to do things in line with that trait. On

210-541: A person's behavior; their ruling passions/obsessions, such as a need for money, fame etc. By contrast, "central" traits such as honesty are characteristics found in some degree in every person – and finally "secondary" traits are those seen only in certain circumstances (such as particular likes or dislikes that a very close friend may know), which are included to provide a complete picture of human complexity. A wide variety of alternative theories and scales were later developed, including: Currently, two general approaches are

245-436: A ritualised set of such non-verbal signs of hostility. In psychological terms, George Kelly considered hostility as the attempt to extort validating evidence from the environment to confirm types of social prediction, constructs , that have failed. Instead of reconstructing their constructs to meet disconfirmations with better predictions, the hostile person attempts to force or coerce the world to fit their view, even if this

280-462: A similar vein, the three-factor approach theorizes that neuroticism is mediated by levels of arousal in the limbic system and that individual differences arise because of variable activation thresholds between people. Therefore, highly neurotic people when presented with minor stressors, will exceed this threshold, whereas people low in neuroticism will not exceed normal activation levels, even when presented with large stressors. By contrast, proponents of

315-424: Is a forlorn hope, and even if it entails emotional expenditure and/or harm to self or others. In this sense hostility is a form of psychological extortion - an attempt to force reality to produce the desired feedback, even by acting out in bullying by individuals and groups in various social contexts, in order that preconceptions become ever more widely validated. Kelly's theory of cognitive hostility thus forms

350-476: Is an inverse function of the serotonergic system , but he later revised this, linking it instead to the dopaminergic system . After examining thousands of personality measures and numerous personality trait frameworks, researchers have created "super-frameworks" that aim to encapsulate all personality traits into a single model (e.g., Pan-Hierarchical Five Factor Model). These models also sometimes identify measures that can be used to measure traits/constructs in

385-430: Is associated with sociability and positive affect , whereas neuroticism is associated with emotional instability and negative affect. Many lower-order factors, or facets , are similar between the two taxonomies. For instance, both approaches contain factors for sociability/gregariousness, for activity levels, and for assertiveness within the higher order factor extraversion. However, there are differences too. First,

SECTION 10

#1733085831042

420-448: Is claimed that hostility shows evidence of suppression or denial , and is "deleted" from awareness - unfavorable evidence which might suggest that a prior belief is flawed is to various degrees ignored and willfully avoided. Facet (psychology) In psychology , a facet is a specific and unique aspect of a broader personality trait . Both the concept and the term "facet" were introduced by Paul Costa and Robert McCrae in

455-409: Is directed at Thems, something exploited by insecure leaders when they mobilise external conflicts so as to reduce in-group hostility towards themselves. Automatic mental functioning suggests that among universal human indicators of hostility are the grinding or gnashing of teeth, the clenching and shaking of fists, and grimacing. Desmond Morris would add stamping and thumping. The Haka represents

490-614: Is measured with a separate scale. The use of facets and facet scales has since expanded beyond the NEO PI-R, with alternative facet and domain structures derived from other models of personality. Examples include the HEXACO model of personality structure , psycholexical studies , circumplex models (e.g., Goldberg's Abridged Big-Five Dimensional Circumplex), the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ), and

525-495: The California Psychological Inventory . Costa and McCrae originally developed facet scales for neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience to reflect the fact that each broader trait is composed of different aspects of personality. They admit their decisions were somewhat arbitrary and acknowledge that each trait may actually have more or less than six facets. However, they justify their choices with

560-477: The limbic system in the brain as key components that mediate cortical arousal and emotional responses respectively. Eysenck advocates that extraverts have low levels of cortical arousal and introverts have high levels, leading extraverts to seek out more stimulation from socializing and being venturesome. Moreover, Eysenck surmised that there would be an optimal level of arousal, after which inhibition would occur and that this would be different for each person. In

595-521: The Interpersonal Circle and two of the Big Five, it was only later that the work of Lewis Goldberg with Dean Peabody, and Willem Hofstee and Boele de Raad integrated the circumplex and Five Factor models. The result was The Abridged Big-Five Dimensional Circumplex (AB5C). In place of specific facet labels, Goldberg and his colleagues use Roman numerals , and plus and minus signs corresponding to

630-504: The MPQ contains three scales assessing the validity of responses. The "Unlikely Virtues" scale is designed to assess impression management , the "True Response Inconsistency" scale assesses the tendency to answer all questions true (or false), and the "Variable Response Inconsistency" scale assesses inconsistent responses to similar or opposite questions. The following table displays Tellegen's labels for broad traits, primary traits (facets), and

665-499: The facet structures of traits in the HEXACO model differ from those in the five factor model. In addition to these trait-specific facets, Ashton and Lee have proposed two "interstitial" facets located in the space between traits. The first, altruism (versus antagonism), is shared by honesty-humility, agreeableness, and emotionality. The second, negative self-evaluation, is shared by extraversion and emotionality. The following table displays

700-595: The first edition of the NEO-Personality Inventory (NEO-PI) Manual . Facets were originally elaborated only for the neuroticism , openness to experience , and extraversion traits; Costa and McCrae introduced facet scales for the agreeableness and conscientiousness traits in the Revised NEO-PI (NEO PI-R). Each of the Big Five personality traits in the five factor model contains six facets, each of which

735-415: The five-factor approach assume a role of genetics and environment but offer no explicit causal explanation. Given this emphasis on biology in the three-factor approach, it would be expected that the third trait, psychoticism, would have a similar explanation. However, the causal properties of this state are not well defined. Eysenck has suggested that psychoticism is related to testosterone levels and

SECTION 20

#1733085831042

770-418: The individual. Gordon Allport's trait theory not only served as a foundational approach within personality psychology, but also is continued to be viewed and discussed by other disciplines such as anthropology because of how he approached culture within trait theory. Trait theory tends to focus on the individual over the situation in which they are in. This focus has relaxed within modern studies allowing for

805-425: The most popular: Cultures are widely known and accepted as being different in varying degrees. This can make the study of personality difficult as meaning and the expression of traits may be different within cultural groups. Trait theory uses a hierarchy of traits in order to separate culture from the traits; it can be said the culture is ignored in order to focus on the individual traits and how they are connected to

840-455: The need for a balance between comprehension and comprehensiveness and research supporting their six facet breakdown of each Big Five personality trait . The following table displays the labels used by Costa and McCrae for each personality domain and its constituent facets. In contrast with Costa and McCrae's admittedly arbitrary decisions, studies guided by the Lexical hypothesis root facets in

875-477: The orthogonal structure between factors. Hans Eysenck has argued that fewer factors are superior to a larger number of partly related ones. Although these two approaches are comparable because of the use of factor analysis to construct hierarchical taxonomies, they differ in the organization and number of factors. Whatever the causes, psychoticism marks the two approaches apart, as the five factor model contains no such trait. Moreover, psychoticism, unlike any of

910-625: The other factors in either approach, does not fit a normal distribution curve . Indeed, scores are rarely high, thus skewing a normal distribution . However, when they are high, there is considerable overlap with psychiatric conditions such as antisocial and schizoid personality disorders . Similarly, high scorers on neuroticism are more susceptible to sleep and psychosomatic disorders. Five factor approaches can also predict future mental disorders. There are two higher-order factors that both taxonomies clearly share: extraversion and neuroticism . Both approaches broadly accept that extraversion

945-404: The other hand, traits as descriptive summaries are descriptions of our actions that do not try to infer causality. Gordon Allport was an early pioneer in the study of traits. This early work was viewed as the beginning of the modern psychological study of personality. He also referred to traits within his work as dispositions. In his approach, "cardinal" traits are those that dominate and shape

980-467: The personality language of laypeople. This approach is meant to test, and possibly enhance, the content validity of the measures used. Using the five factor model , Gerard Saucier and Fritz Ostendorf explored each domain's facet structure through lexical studies. Using English and German participants and materials, they found a total of 18 facets, or "subcomponents", of the Big Five. These are: The standard five factor model conceives of personality as

1015-424: The rights and duties of hospitality. Tensions between the two poles of hostility and hospitality remain a potent force in the 21st century world. Robert Sapolsky argues that the tendency to form in-groups and out-groups of Us and Them, and to direct hostility at the latter, is inherent in humans. He also explores the possibility raised by Samuel Bowles that intra-group hostility is reduced when greater hostility

1050-475: The subscales of absorption. The HEXACO model is a six-factor model of personality. This model was developed in the early 2000s by Michael C. Ashton and Kibeom Lee using lexical studies. The HEXACO model adds a sixth factor, honesty-humility , to five factors similar to those in the Big Five: emotionality , extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness , and openness to experience . Despite these similarities,

1085-407: The three factor model's emphasis on fewer high-order factors. Although both major trait models are descriptive, only the three-factor model offers a detailed causal explanation. Eysenck suggests that different personality traits are caused by the properties of the brain , which themselves are the result of genetic factors. In particular, the three-factor model identifies the reticular system and

Hostility - Misplaced Pages Continue

1120-416: The three-factor approach contains nine lower-order factors and the five-factor approach has six. Eysenck's psychoticism factor incorporates some of the polar opposites of the lower order factors of openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness. A high scorer on tough-mindedness in psychoticism would score low on tender-mindedness in agreeableness. Most of the differences between the taxonomies stem from

1155-708: The trait and facet labels used by Ashton and Lee. Trait theory In psychology , trait theory (also called dispositional theory ) is an approach to the study of human personality . Trait theorists are primarily interested in the measurement of traits , which can be defined as habitual patterns of behavior, thought , and emotion . According to this perspective, traits are aspects of personality that are relatively stable over time, differ across individuals (e.g. some people are outgoing whereas others are not), are relatively consistent over situations, and influence behaviour. Traits are in contrast to states , which are more transitory dispositions. Some traits are something

1190-746: The two intersecting factors. For example, the facet corresponding to the intersection of extraversion and disagreeableness is represented by "I+II−". The following tables list adjectives associated with the intersections of high scores (+) and low scores (−) on the Five Factors. Corresponding NEO PI-R labels are provided in parentheses , with adjectives approximating pure Big Five traits (e.g., extraversion, neuroticism) in bold . Empty cells represent impossible combinations (e.g., I+I−) or "blank spaces" (e.g., II+III−) – that is, combinations that are either unimportant or do not naturally appear in language. The Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ)

1225-524: Was developed by Auke Tellegen at the University of Minnesota in the early 1980s. It has been used since its development in the Minnesota Twin Family Study . Three of the four broad traits measured by the MPQ contain between three and four facets, or "primary traits". The fourth, " absorption ", is classified as both a broad trait and a primary trait. In addition to these personality measures,

#41958