Misplaced Pages

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation ( Yavapai : A'ba:ja ), formerly the Fort McDowell Mohave-Apache Community of the Fort McDowell Indian Reservation , is a federally recognized tribe and Indian reservation in Maricopa County, Arizona about 23 miles (37 km) northeast of Phoenix .

#221778

67-617: The reservation was officially created on September 15, 1903, by executive order , on a small parcel carved from the ancestral lands of the Yavapai people, encompassing 24,680 acres (100 km). The acreage had been part of the Fort McDowell Military Reserve, which had been an important outpost during the Apache Wars . The original inhabitants of the reservation were members of the kwevikopaya, or Southeastern Yavapai , who lived in

134-486: A rodeo and pow wow each November. After the passage of the 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act , a casino was built on the reservation. In 1992, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation attempted to seize the gaming devices of the casino. This raid took place in conjunction with raids at four other Indian reservations throughout the country. While the raids at the other four reservations went unopposed, members of

201-544: A separation of powers being the most likely to utilize judicial review. Nevertheless, many countries whose legal systems are based on the idea of legislative supremacy have gradually adopted or expanded the scope of judicial review, including countries from both the civil law and common law traditions. Another reason why judicial review should be understood in the context of both the development of two distinct legal systems ( civil law and common law ) and two theories of democracy (legislative supremacy and separation of powers)

268-543: A British colony could not enact laws which altered provisions of British laws which applied directly to the colony. Since the constitutions of Canada and Australia were enacted by the British Parliament, laws passed by governments in Australia and Canada had to be consistent with those constitutional provisions. More recently, the principle of judicial review flows from supremacy clauses in their constitutions. In Australia,

335-541: A Congressional override of an executive order is a nearly impossible event, because of the supermajority vote required, and the fact that such a vote leaves individual lawmakers vulnerable to political criticism. On July 30, 2014, the US House of Representatives approved a resolution authorizing Speaker of the House John Boehner to sue President Obama over claims that he exceeded his executive authority in changing

402-522: A check on the powers of the other branches of government, thus creating a regulative balance among all branches of government. The key to this idea is checks and balances . In the United States, judicial review is considered a key check on the powers of the other two branches of government by the judiciary. Differences in organizing democratic societies led to different views regarding judicial review, with societies based on common law and those stressing

469-579: A full, precise, and distinct general idea of the affairs of the United States" in their fields. According to political scientist Brian R. Dirck, the most famous executive order was by President Abraham Lincoln when he issued the Emancipation Proclamation on September 22, 1862, which in part contained explicit directions to the Army, the Navy, and other Executive departments: The Emancipation Proclamation

536-509: A key provision of the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare") on his own and over what Republicans claimed had been "inadequate enforcement of the health care law", which Republican lawmakers opposed. In particular, Republicans "objected that the Obama administration delayed some parts of the law, particularly the mandate on employers who do not provide health care coverage". The suit was filed in

603-408: A later fiscal year . The governor may also call the legislature into special session . There are also other uses for gubernatorial executive orders. In 2007, for example, Sonny Perdue , the governor of Georgia, issued an executive order for all its state agencies to reduce water use during a major drought . The same was demanded of its counties ' water systems as well, but it was unclear whether

670-555: A leading jurist of the time. This system was also adopted the same time by Austria and became known as the Austrian System , also under the primary authorship of Hans Kelsen, being emulated by a number of other countries. In these systems, other courts are not competent to question the constitutionality of primary legislation; they often may, however, initiate the process of review by the Constitutional Court. Russia adopts

737-570: A mixed model since (as in the US) courts at all levels, both federal and state, are empowered to review primary legislation and declare its constitutionality; as in the Czech Republic, there is a constitutional court in charge of reviewing the constitutionality of primary legislation. The difference is that in the first case, the decision about the law's adequacy to the Russian Constitution only binds

SECTION 10

#1733085546222

804-476: A particular matter of controversy; it requires cost-benefit analysis for certain regulatory actions. Executive orders issued by state governors are not the same as statutes passed by state legislatures. State executive orders are usually based on existing constitutional or statutory powers of the governor and do not require any action by the state legislature to take effect. Executive orders may, for example, demand budget cuts from state government when

871-415: A practical presidential tool for policy making because of the perception that proclamations are largely ceremonial or symbolic in nature. However, the legal weight of presidential proclamations suggests their importance to presidential governance. Judicial review Judicial review is a process under which a government's executive , legislative , or administrative actions are subject to review by

938-632: A review of the validity of primary legislation. In the United Kingdom, Acts of Parliament cannot be set aside under the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty , whereas Orders in Council , another type of primary legislation not passed by Parliament, can (see Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service (1985) and Miller / Cherry (2019)). Another example is the Netherlands , where

1005-417: A system of administrative courts which are charged with resolving disputes between members of the public and the administration, regardless these courts are part of administration (France) or judiciary (Germany). In other countries (including the United States and United Kingdom), judicial review is carried out by regular civil courts although it may be delegated to specialized panels within these courts (such as

1072-534: Is not technically part of the federal judicial branch). It is quite common that before a request for judicial review of an administrative act is filed with a court, certain preliminary conditions (such as a complaint to the authority itself) must be fulfilled. In most countries, the courts apply special procedures in administrative cases. There are three broad approaches to judicial review of the constitutionality of primary legislation —that is, laws passed directly by an elected legislature. Some countries do not permit

1139-475: Is that some countries with common-law systems do not have judicial review of primary legislation. Though a common-law system is present in the United Kingdom, the country still has a strong attachment to the idea of legislative supremacy; consequently, judges in the United Kingdom do not have the power to strike down primary legislation. However, when the United Kingdom became a member of the European Union there

1206-517: The federal government . The legal or constitutional basis for executive orders has multiple sources. Article Two of the United States Constitution gives presidents broad executive and enforcement authority to use their discretion to determine how to enforce the law or to otherwise manage the resources and staff of the executive branch. The ability to make such orders is also based on expressed or implied Acts of Congress that delegate to

1273-444: The judiciary . In a judicial review, a court may invalidate laws, acts, or governmental actions that are incompatible with a higher authority. For example, an executive decision may be invalidated for being unlawful, or a statute may be invalidated for violating the terms of a constitution . Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers —the power of the judiciary to supervise ( judicial supervision )

1340-558: The racial integration of the armed forces under President Truman. Two extreme examples of an executive order are Franklin Roosevelt's Executive Order 6102 "forbidding the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States", and Executive Order 9066 , which delegated military authority to remove any or all people in a military zone (used to target Japanese Americans , non-citizen Germans , and non-citizen Italians in certain regions). The order

1407-427: The state legislature is not in session, and economic conditions take a downturn , thereby decreasing tax revenue below what was forecast when the budget was approved. Depending on the state constitution , a governor may specify by what percentage each government agency must reduce and may exempt those that are already particularly underfunded or cannot put long-term expenses (such as capital expenditures ) off until

SECTION 20

#1733085546222

1474-534: The "Anglos" who were buried there were later transferred to El Presidio Cemetery in San Francisco after the land was ceded to the Yavapai Nation. 33°38′28″N 111°39′52″W  /  33.64111°N 111.66444°W  / 33.64111; -111.66444 Executive order In the United States, an executive order is a directive by the president of the United States that manages operations of

1541-680: The Administrative Court within the High Court of England and Wales ). The United States employs a mixed system in which some administrative decisions are reviewed by the United States district courts (which are the general trial courts), some are reviewed directly by the United States courts of appeals and others are reviewed by specialized tribunals such as the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (which, despite its name,

1608-778: The Court found that the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) was unconstitutional. The president then issued Executive Order 7073 "by virtue of the authority vested in me under the said Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 ", re-establishing the National Emergency Council to administer the functions of the NIRA in carrying out the provisions of the Emergency Relief Appropriations Act. On June 15, he issued Executive Order 7075, which terminated

1675-759: The Laws be faithfully executed". The U.S. Supreme Court has held that all executive orders from the president of the United States must be supported by the Constitution, whether from a clause granting specific power, or by Congress delegating such to the executive branch. Specifically, such orders must be rooted in Article II of the US Constitution or enacted by the Congress in statutes . Attempts to block such orders have been successful at times, when such orders either exceeded

1742-794: The NIRA and replaced it with the Office of Administration of the National Recovery Administration . In the years that followed, Roosevelt replaced outgoing justices of the Supreme Court with people more in line with his views: Hugo Black , Stanley Reed , Felix Frankfurter , William O. Douglas , Frank Murphy , Robert H. Jackson and James F. Byrnes . Historically, only George Washington has had equal or greater influence over Supreme Court appointments (as he chose all its original members). Justices Frankfurter, Douglas, Black, and Jackson dramatically checked presidential power by invalidating

1809-487: The Supreme Court overturned five of Franklin Roosevelt's executive orders (6199, 6204, 6256, 6284a and 6855). Executive Order 12954 , issued by President Bill Clinton in 1995, attempted to prevent the federal government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll: a federal appeals court ruled that the order conflicted with the National Labor Relations Act and overturned

1876-613: The US District Court for the District of Columbia on November 21, 2014. Part of President Donald Trump 's executive order Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States , which temporarily banned entry to the US of citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries, including for permanent residents, was stayed by a federal court on January 28, 2017. However, on June 26, 2018,

1943-515: The US Supreme Court overturned the lower court order in Trump v. Hawaii and affirmed that the executive order was within the president's constitutional authority. The degree to which the president has the power to use executive orders to set policy for independent federal agencies is disputed. Many orders specifically exempt independent agencies, but some do not. Executive Order 12866 has been

2010-605: The United States . On March 7, 1934, he established the National Recovery Review Board (Executive Order 6632). On June 29, the president issued Executive Order 6763 "under the authority vested in me by the Constitution", thereby creating the National Labor Relations Board . In 1934, while Charles Evans Hughes was Chief Justice of the United States (the period being known as the Hughes Court ),

2077-404: The United States, federal and state courts (at all levels, both appellate and trial) are able to review and declare the " constitutionality ", or agreement with the Constitution (or lack thereof) of legislation by a process of judicial interpretation that is relevant to any case properly within their jurisdiction. In American legal language, "judicial review" refers primarily to the adjudication of

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation - Misplaced Pages Continue

2144-909: The Wekopa Resort and Conference Center, the Poco Diablo hotel, the Wekopa Golf Course, and Fort McDowell Adventures. The area now occupied by the reservation was the birthplace of the Native American activist, Carlos Montezuma , who founded the Society of American Indians . The Ba Dah Mod Jo Cemetery is also referred to as the Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Tribal Cemetery. It was where the soldiers who were stationed in Fort McDowell and who perished were buried. The remains of

2211-586: The Yavapai tribe organized a protest. Using cars, trucks, and large mobile earth moving equipment, they blocked the egress from the property, preventing the trucks from carting off the machines. An agreement was reached between the tribe and Governor Fife Symington allowing the casino to remain in operation. In 2018, the Tribe began construction on the new 166,341-square-foot casino which opened in 2020. The outside communities of Fountain Hills and Rio Verde lie adjacent to

2278-612: The authority of the president or could be better handled through legislation. The Office of the Federal Register is responsible for assigning the executive order a sequential number, after receipt of the signed original from the White House and printing the text of the executive order in the daily Federal Register and eventually in Title   3 of the Code of Federal Regulations . With

2345-411: The case law and in which it was repeatedly endorsed during the debate over the Constitution," and thus, on a personal level, Marshall "must have experienced judicial review as long-established." Moreover, "The fact that judicial review was exercised much more frequently than previously recognized in the years before Marbury helps explain why Marshall's assertion of the power to exercise judicial review in

2412-531: The constitution expressly forbids the courts to rule on the question of constitutionality of primary legislation passed by the Dutch legislature or States-General . In countries which have inherited the English common law system of courts of general jurisdiction, judicial review is generally done by those courts, rather than specialised courts. Australia, Canada and the United States are all examples of this approach. In

2479-665: The constitutionality of statutes, especially by the Supreme Court of the United States . Courts in the United States may also invoke judicial review in order to ensure that a statute is not depriving individuals of their constitutional rights. This is commonly held to have been established in the case of Marbury v. Madison , which was argued before the Supreme Court in 1803. Judicial review in Canada and Australia pre-dates their establishment as countries, in 1867 and 1901, respectively. The British Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865 provided that

2546-474: The court had the power of judicial review to enforce the separation of powers stated in the US Constitution. This was left uncontested by the U.S. Congress and president Thomas Jefferson , despite his expressed opposition to the principle of judicial review by an unelected body. Separation of powers is based on the idea that no branch of government should be able to exert power over any other branch without due process of law ; each branch of government should have

2613-413: The distinction of making a record 3,522 executive orders. In 2021, President Joseph Biden issued 42 executive orders in the first 100 days of his presidency, more than any other president since Harry Truman. Before 1932, uncontested executive orders had determined such issues as national mourning on the death of a president and the lowering of flags to half-staff. President Franklin Roosevelt issued

2680-412: The exception of William Henry Harrison , all presidents since George Washington in 1789 have issued orders that in general terms can be described as executive orders. Initially, they took no set form and so they varied as to form and substance. The first executive order was issued by Washington on June 8, 1789; addressed to the heads of the federal departments, it instructed them "to impress [him] with

2747-628: The executive order at issue in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer : in that case Roosevelt's successor, Harry S. Truman , had ordered private steel production facilities seized in Executive Order 10340 to support the Korean War effort: the Court held that the executive order was not within the power granted to the president by the Constitution. Large policy changes with wide-ranging effects have been implemented by executive order, including

Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation - Misplaced Pages Continue

2814-445: The first few weeks in office. The United States Constitution does not have a provision that explicitly permits the use of executive orders. Article   II , Section   1, Clause   1 of the Constitution simply states: "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." Sections   2 and   3 describe the various powers and duties of the president, including "He shall take care that

2881-517: The first of his 3,522 executive orders on March 6, 1933, declaring a bank holiday , and forbidding banks to release gold coin or bullion . Executive Order 6102 forbade the hoarding of gold coin, bullion and gold certificates . A further executive order required all newly mined domestic gold be delivered to the Treasury. By Executive Order 6581, the president created the Export-Import Bank of

2948-465: The law, with no power to create (or destroy) legal principles. Secondly, the idea of separation of powers is another theory about how a democratic society's government should be organized. In contrast to legislative supremacy, the idea of separation of powers was first introduced by Montesquieu ; it was later institutionalized in the United States by the Supreme Court's ruling in Marbury v. Madison that

3015-457: The legislative and executive branches when the latter exceed their authority. The doctrine varies between jurisdictions, so the procedure and scope of judicial review may differ between and within countries. Judicial review can be understood in the context of two distinct—but parallel—legal systems, civil law and common law , and also by two distinct theories of democracy regarding the manner in which government should be organized with respect to

3082-501: The legislative branch, but executive orders have significant influence over the internal affairs of government, deciding how and to what degree legislation will be enforced, dealing with emergencies, waging wars, and in general fine-tuning policy choices in the implementation of broad statutes. As the head of state and head of government of the United States, as well as commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces, only

3149-472: The nearby Mazatzal-Four Peak and Superstition Mountains area. In the 1970s, there was a proposal to build a dam at the confluence of the Verde and Salt Rivers. Due to the negative effects such a dam would have had on the reservation, the community voted not to sell the land for the dam to the federal government. What would have been called the "Orme Dam" was never built. The reservation celebrates this victory with

3216-420: The order would have the force of law. According to political expert Phillip J. Cooper, a presidential proclamation "states a condition, declares a law and requires obedience, recognizes an event or triggers the implementation of a law (by recognizing that the circumstances in law have been realized)". Presidents define situations or conditions on situations that become legal or economic truth. Such orders carry

3283-458: The order. Congress has the power to overturn an executive order by passing legislation that invalidates it, and can also refuse to provide funding necessary to carry out certain policy measures contained with the order or legitimize policy mechanisms. In the case of the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order. It has been argued that

3350-455: The parties to the lawsuit; in the second, the Court's decision must be followed by judges and government officials at all levels. Judicial review as a contribution to political theory is sometimes said to be a "distinctively American contribution," argued to have been established in the US Supreme Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803). However, "the American version of judicial review

3417-434: The powers outlined in the Constitution, the order instead simply proclaims "under the authority vested in me by the Constitution". Wars have been fought upon executive order, including the 1999 Kosovo War during President Bill Clinton 's second term in office; however, all such wars have also had authorizing resolutions from Congress. The extent to which the president may exercise military power independently of Congress and

SECTION 50

#1733085546222

3484-433: The president of the United States can issue an executive order. Presidential executive orders, once issued, remain in force until they are canceled, revoked, adjudicated unlawful, or expire on their terms. At any time, the president may revoke, modify or make exceptions from any executive order, whether the order was made by the current president or a predecessor. Typically, a new president reviews in-force executive orders in

3551-450: The president some degree of discretionary power ( delegated legislation ). The vast majority of executive orders are proposed by federal agencies before being issued by the president. Like both legislative statutes and the regulations promulgated by government agencies, executive orders are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if the orders lack support by statute or the Constitution. Some policy initiatives require approval by

3618-418: The principles and doctrines of legislative supremacy and the separation of powers. First, two distinct legal systems, civil law and common law , have different views about judicial review. Common-law judges are seen as sources of law, capable of creating new legal principles, and also capable of rejecting legal principles that are no longer valid. In the civil-law tradition, judges are seen as those who apply

3685-598: The reservation. In addition to Rio Verde and Fountain Hills, the reservation's economy is also closely tied to the nearby cities of Mesa , Scottsdale and Phoenix . Also in the area is the Salt River Indian Reservation of the Pima and Maricopa peoples. The tribe operates its own gas station, a large sand and gravel operation, a farm, and the Fort McDowell Casino. Other operations on the reservation include

3752-415: The same force of law as executive orders, the difference between being that executive orders are aimed at those inside government, but proclamations are aimed at those outside government. The administrative weight of those proclamations is upheld because they are often specifically authorized by congressional statute, making them "delegated unilateral powers". Presidential proclamations are often dismissed as

3819-566: The same way that judicial decisions are, rather a court will enforce that principles of procedural fairness are followed when making judicial decisions. Most modern legal systems allow the courts to review administrative "acts" (individual decisions of a public body, such as a decision to grant a subsidy or to withdraw a residence permit). In most systems, this also includes review of secondary legislation (legally enforceable rules of general applicability adopted by administrative bodies). Some countries (notably France and Germany) have implemented

3886-563: The scope of the War Powers Resolution remain unresolved constitutional issues, but all presidents since the passage of the resolution have complied with its terms, while also maintaining that they are not constitutionally required to do so. Harry S. Truman issued 907 executive orders, with 1,081 orders made by Theodore Roosevelt , 1,203 orders made by Calvin Coolidge , and 1,803 orders made by Woodrow Wilson . Franklin D. Roosevelt has

3953-569: The spirit and letter of existing U.S. law on access to presidential papers as clearly laid down in 44 USC 2201–07", and adding that the order "potentially threatens to undermine one of the very foundations of our nation". President Barack Obama subsequently revoked Executive Order 13233 in January 2009. The Heritage Foundation has accused presidents of abusing executive orders by using them to make laws without Congressional approval and moving existing laws away from their original mandates. In 1935,

4020-537: The term 'judicial review' generally refers to reviews of the lawfulness of the actions of the executive and the public service, while reviews of the compatibility of laws with the Australian Constitution is known as characterisation or constitutional challenges. In 1920, Czechoslovakia adopted a system of judicial review by a specialized court, the Constitutional Court as written by Hans Kelsen ,

4087-712: Was an executive order, itself a rather unusual thing in those days. Executive orders are simply presidential directives issued to agents of the executive department by its boss. Until the early 1900s, executive orders were mostly unannounced and undocumented, and seen only by the agencies to which they were directed. That changed when the US Department of State instituted a numbering scheme in 1907, starting retroactively with United States Executive Order 1, issued on October 20, 1862, by President Lincoln. The documents that later came to be known as "executive orders" apparently gained their name from that order issued by Lincoln, which

SECTION 60

#1733085546222

4154-552: Was captioned "Executive Order Establishing a Provisional Court in Louisiana". That court functioned during the military occupation of Louisiana during the American Civil War , and Lincoln also used Executive Order   1 to appoint Charles A. Peabody as judge and designate the salaries of the court's officers. President Harry Truman 's Executive Order 10340 placed all the country's steel mills under federal control, which

4221-515: Was found invalid in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer , 343 US 579 (1952), because it attempted to make law, rather than to clarify or to further a law put forth by the Congress or the Constitution. Presidents since that decision have generally been careful to cite the specific laws under which they act when they issue new executive orders; likewise, when presidents believe that their authority for issuing an executive order stems from within

4288-407: Was much better established in the years immediately after the adoption of the [United States] constitution than has previously been recognized, and it was far from rare... [and] judicial invalidation of statutes fell into certain patterns." US Chief Justice John Marshall, the author of Marbury v. Madison , "came from Virginia, the state in which [judicial review] was particularly well established by

4355-640: Was tension between its tendency toward legislative supremacy and the EU's legal system, which specifically gives the Court of Justice of the European Union the power of judicial review. When carrying out judicial review a court may ensure that the principle of ultra vires are followed, that a public body's actions do not exceed the powers given to them by legislation. The decisions of administrative acts by public bodies under judicial review are not necessarily controlled in

4422-736: Was the logical result of centuries of European thought and colonial experience which had made Western [societies] generally willing to admit the theoretical primacy of certain kinds of law and had made Americans in particular ready to provide a judicial means of enforcing that primacy." That is, the "belief in the need to subordinate certain acts of the law-making power to higher, more permanent principles" can be seen, for example, in medieval European scholastics , courts of equity in England, Parlements in France, and Enlightenment philosophes . Moreover, writing in 2005, Treanor argued that "judicial review

4489-496: Was then delegated to General John L. DeWitt , and it subsequently paved the way for all Japanese-Americans on the West Coast to be sent to internment camps for the duration of World War II . President George W. Bush issued Executive Order 13233 in 2001, which restricted public access to the papers of former presidents. The order was criticized by the Society of American Archivists and other groups, who say it "violates both

#221778