Misplaced Pages

Monster group

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

In mathematics , more specifically algebra , abstract algebra or modern algebra is the study of algebraic structures , which are sets with specific operations acting on their elements. Algebraic structures include groups , rings , fields , modules , vector spaces , lattices , and algebras over a field . The term abstract algebra was coined in the early 20th century to distinguish it from older parts of algebra, and more specifically from elementary algebra , the use of variables to represent numbers in computation and reasoning. The abstract perspective on algebra has become so fundamental to advanced mathematics that it is simply called "algebra", while the term "abstract algebra" is seldom used except in pedagogy .

#759240

110-586: In the area of abstract algebra known as group theory , the monster group M (also known as the Fischer–Griess monster , or the friendly giant ) is the largest sporadic simple group , having order The finite simple groups have been completely classified . Every such group belongs to one of 18 countably infinite families or is one of 26 sporadic groups that do not follow such a systematic pattern. The monster group contains 20 sporadic groups (including itself) as subquotients . Robert Griess , who proved

220-478: A {\displaystyle a} of G {\displaystyle G} , there exists an element b {\displaystyle b} so that a ⋅ b = b ⋅ a = e {\displaystyle a\cdot b=b\cdot a=e} . Associativity : for each triplet of elements a , b , c {\displaystyle a,b,c} in G {\displaystyle G} , it holds that (

330-408: A − b ) ( c − d ) = a c + b d − a d − b c {\displaystyle (a-b)(c-d)=ac+bd-ad-bc} . Peacock used what he termed the principle of the permanence of equivalent forms to justify his argument, but his reasoning suffered from the problem of induction . For example, a b =

440-519: A ⋅ b ) ⋅ c = a ⋅ ( b ⋅ c ) {\displaystyle (a\cdot b)\cdot c=a\cdot (b\cdot c)} . A ring is a set R {\displaystyle R} with two binary operations , addition: ( x , y ) ↦ x + y , {\displaystyle (x,y)\mapsto x+y,} and multiplication: ( x , y ) ↦ x y {\displaystyle (x,y)\mapsto xy} satisfying

550-459: A b {\displaystyle {\sqrt {a}}{\sqrt {b}}={\sqrt {ab}}} holds for the nonnegative real numbers , but not for general complex numbers . Several areas of mathematics led to the study of groups. Lagrange's 1770 study of the solutions of the quintic equation led to the Galois group of a polynomial . Gauss's 1801 study of Fermat's little theorem led to the ring of integers modulo n ,

660-494: A to the field F . One of the basic propositions required for completely determining the Galois groups of a finite field extension is the following: Given a polynomial f ( x ) ∈ F [ x ] {\displaystyle f(x)\in F[x]} , let E / F {\displaystyle E/F} be its splitting field extension. Then the order of

770-416: A basis. He extended this further in 1890 to Hilbert's basis theorem . Once these theories had been developed, it was still several decades until an abstract ring concept emerged. The first axiomatic definition was given by Abraham Fraenkel in 1914. His definition was mainly the standard axioms: a set with two operations addition, which forms a group (not necessarily commutative), and multiplication, which

880-400: A certain binary operation defined on them form magmas , to which the concepts concerning magmas, as well those concerning sets, apply. We can add additional constraints on the algebraic structure, such as associativity (to form semigroups ); identity, and inverses (to form groups ); and other more complex structures. With additional structure, more theorems could be proved, but the generality

990-578: A corollary of this is In fact, any finite abelian group can be found as the Galois group of some subfield of a cyclotomic field extension by the Kronecker–Weber theorem . Another useful class of examples of Galois groups with finite abelian groups comes from finite fields. If q is a prime power, and if F = F q {\displaystyle F=\mathbb {F} _{q}} and E = F q n {\displaystyle E=\mathbb {F} _{q^{n}}} denote

1100-486: A group of order 4 {\displaystyle 4} , the Klein four-group , they determine the entire Galois group. Another example is given from the splitting field E / Q {\displaystyle E/\mathbb {Q} } of the polynomial Note because ( x − 1 ) f ( x ) = x 5 − 1 , {\displaystyle (x-1)f(x)=x^{5}-1,}

1210-807: A long history. c.  1700 BC , the Babylonians were able to solve quadratic equations specified as word problems. This word problem stage is classified as rhetorical algebra and was the dominant approach up to the 16th century. Al-Khwarizmi originated the word "algebra" in 830 AD, but his work was entirely rhetorical algebra. Fully symbolic algebra did not appear until François Viète 's 1591 New Algebra , and even this had some spelled out words that were given symbols in Descartes's 1637 La Géométrie . The formal study of solving symbolic equations led Leonhard Euler to accept what were then considered "nonsense" roots such as negative numbers and imaginary numbers , in

SECTION 10

#1732876567760

1320-510: A major field of algebra. Cayley, Sylvester, Gordan and others found the Jacobian and the Hessian for binary quartic forms and cubic forms. In 1868 Gordan proved that the graded algebra of invariants of a binary form over the complex numbers was finitely generated, i.e., has a basis. Hilbert wrote a thesis on invariants in 1885 and in 1890 showed that any form of any degree or number of variables has

1430-511: A maximal subgroup) of the Monster is selected in which it is easy to perform calculations. The subgroup H chosen is 3.2.Suz.2, where Suz is the Suzuki group . Elements of the monster are stored as words in the elements of H and an extra generator T . It is reasonably quick to calculate the action of one of these words on a vector in V . Using this action, it is possible to perform calculations (such as

1540-423: A new maximal subgroup of the form L 2 (13) and confirmed that there are no maximal subgroups with socle L 2 (8) or L 2 (16), thus completing the classification in the literature. Note that tables of maximal subgroups have often been found to contain subtle errors, and in particular at least two of the subgroups in this table were incorrectly omitted from some previous lists. There are also connections between

1650-453: A polynomial ring is a finite intersection of primary ideals . Macauley proved the uniqueness of this decomposition. Overall, this work led to the development of algebraic geometry . In 1801 Gauss introduced binary quadratic forms over the integers and defined their equivalence . He further defined the discriminant of these forms, which is an invariant of a binary form . Between the 1860s and 1890s invariant theory developed and became

1760-538: A simple group containing a double cover of Fischer's baby monster group as a centralizer of an involution . Within a few months, the order of M was found by Griess using the Thompson order formula , and Fischer, Conway , Norton and Thompson discovered other groups as subquotients, including many of the known sporadic groups, and two new ones: the Thompson group and the Harada–Norton group . The character table of

1870-518: A theory of algebraic function fields which allowed the first rigorous definition of a Riemann surface and a rigorous proof of the Riemann–Roch theorem . Kronecker in the 1880s, Hilbert in 1890, Lasker in 1905, and Macauley in 1913 further investigated the ideals of polynomial rings implicit in E. Noether 's work. Lasker proved a special case of the Lasker-Noether theorem , namely that every ideal in

1980-447: A typical modern PC, which is five orders of magnitude faster than estimated by Robert A. Wilson in 2013. The mmgroup software package has been used to find two new maximal subgroups of the monster group. Previously, Robert A. Wilson had found explicitly (with the aid of a computer) two invertible 196,882 by 196,882 matrices (with elements in the field of order 2 ) which together generate the monster group by matrix multiplication; this

2090-529: Is Q ( ζ n ) {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} (\zeta _{n})} and has automorphisms σ a {\displaystyle \sigma _{a}} sending ζ n ↦ ζ n a {\displaystyle \zeta _{n}\mapsto \zeta _{n}^{a}} for 1 ≤ a < n {\displaystyle 1\leq a<n} relatively prime to n {\displaystyle n} . Since

2200-462: Is Another useful class of examples comes from the splitting fields of cyclotomic polynomials . These are polynomials Φ n {\displaystyle \Phi _{n}} defined as whose degree is ϕ ( n ) {\displaystyle \phi (n)} , Euler's totient function at n {\displaystyle n} . Then, the splitting field over Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} }

2310-429: Is A 12 . The 46 classes of maximal subgroups of the monster are given by the following table. Previous unpublished work of Wilson et. al had purported to rule out any almost simple subgroups with non-abelian simple socles of the form U 3 (4), L 2 (8), and L 2 (16). However, the latter was contradicted by Dietrich et al., who found a new maximal subgroup of the form U 3 (4). The same authors had previously found

SECTION 20

#1732876567760

2420-665: Is a Galois field extension K w / k v {\displaystyle K_{w}/k_{v}} ), the field morphism s w {\displaystyle s_{w}} is in fact an isomorphism of k v {\displaystyle k_{v}} -algebras. If we take the isotropy subgroup of G {\displaystyle G} for the valuation class w {\displaystyle w} G w = { s ∈ G : s w = w } {\displaystyle G_{w}=\{s\in G:sw=w\}} then there

2530-463: Is a field K / F {\displaystyle K/F} such that f {\displaystyle f} factors as a product of linear polynomials over the field K {\displaystyle K} , then the Galois group of the polynomial f {\displaystyle f} is defined as the Galois group of K / F {\displaystyle K/F} where K {\displaystyle K}

2640-950: Is a normal field extension, then the associated subgroup in Gal ⁡ ( K / k ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Gal} (K/k)} is a normal group. Suppose K 1 , K 2 {\displaystyle K_{1},K_{2}} are Galois extensions of k {\displaystyle k} with Galois groups G 1 , G 2 . {\displaystyle G_{1},G_{2}.} The field K 1 K 2 {\displaystyle K_{1}K_{2}} with Galois group G = Gal ⁡ ( K 1 K 2 / k ) {\displaystyle G=\operatorname {Gal} (K_{1}K_{2}/k)} has an injection G → G 1 × G 2 {\displaystyle G\to G_{1}\times G_{2}} which

2750-494: Is a related subject that studies types of algebraic structures as single objects. For example, the structure of groups is a single object in universal algebra, which is called the variety of groups . Before the nineteenth century, algebra was defined as the study of polynomials . Abstract algebra came into existence during the nineteenth century as more complex problems and solution methods developed. Concrete problems and examples came from number theory, geometry, analysis, and

2860-441: Is a specific group associated with the field extension. The study of field extensions and their relationship to the polynomials that give rise to them via Galois groups is called Galois theory , so named in honor of Évariste Galois who first discovered them. For a more elementary discussion of Galois groups in terms of permutation groups , see the article on Galois theory . Suppose that E {\displaystyle E}

2970-676: Is a surjection of the global Galois group to the local Galois group such that there is an isomorphism between the local Galois group and the isotropy subgroup. Diagrammatically, this means Gal ⁡ ( K / v ) ↠ Gal ⁡ ( K w / k v ) ↓ ↓ G ↠ G w {\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}\operatorname {Gal} (K/v)&\twoheadrightarrow &\operatorname {Gal} (K_{w}/k_{v})\\\downarrow &&\downarrow \\G&\twoheadrightarrow &G_{w}\end{matrix}}} where

3080-441: Is a unique product of prime ideals , a precursor of the theory of Dedekind domains . Overall, Dedekind's work created the subject of algebraic number theory . In the 1850s, Riemann introduced the fundamental concept of a Riemann surface . Riemann's methods relied on an assumption he called Dirichlet's principle , which in 1870 was questioned by Weierstrass. Much later, in 1900, Hilbert justified Riemann's approach by developing

3190-452: Is an isomorphism α : E → E {\displaystyle \alpha :E\to E} such that α ( x ) = x {\displaystyle \alpha (x)=x} for each x ∈ F {\displaystyle x\in F} . The set of all automorphisms of E / F {\displaystyle E/F} forms a group with

3300-528: Is an example of a degree 4 {\displaystyle 4} field extension. This has two automorphisms σ , τ {\displaystyle \sigma ,\tau } where σ ( 2 ) = − 2 {\displaystyle \sigma ({\sqrt {2}})=-{\sqrt {2}}} and τ ( 3 ) = − 3 . {\displaystyle \tau ({\sqrt {3}})=-{\sqrt {3}}.} Since these two generators define

3410-500: Is an extension of the field F {\displaystyle F} (written as E / F {\displaystyle E/F} and read " E over F " ). An automorphism of E / F {\displaystyle E/F} is defined to be an automorphism of E {\displaystyle E} that fixes F {\displaystyle F} pointwise. In other words, an automorphism of E / F {\displaystyle E/F}

Monster group - Misplaced Pages Continue

3520-422: Is an isomorphism of the corresponding Galois groups: In the following examples F {\displaystyle F} is a field, and C , R , Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ,\mathbb {R} ,\mathbb {Q} } are the fields of complex , real , and rational numbers, respectively. The notation F ( a ) indicates the field extension obtained by adjoining an element

3630-568: Is an isomorphism whenever K 1 ∩ K 2 = k {\displaystyle K_{1}\cap K_{2}=k} . As a corollary, this can be inducted finitely many times. Given Galois extensions K 1 , … , K n / k {\displaystyle K_{1},\ldots ,K_{n}/k} where K i + 1 ∩ ( K 1 ⋯ K i ) = k , {\displaystyle K_{i+1}\cap (K_{1}\cdots K_{i})=k,} then there

3740-409: Is associative, distributes over addition, and has an identity element. In addition, he had two axioms on "regular elements" inspired by work on the p-adic numbers , which excluded now-common rings such as the ring of integers. These allowed Fraenkel to prove that addition was commutative. Fraenkel's work aimed to transfer Steinitz's 1910 definition of fields over to rings, but it was not connected with

3850-429: Is because K {\displaystyle K} is not a normal extension , since the other two cube roots of 2 {\displaystyle 2} , are missing from the extension—in other words K is not a splitting field . The Galois group Gal ⁡ ( C / R ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Gal} (\mathbb {C} /\mathbb {R} )} has two elements,

3960-409: Is called the Galois group of E / F {\displaystyle E/F} , and is usually denoted by Gal ⁡ ( E / F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Gal} (E/F)} . If E / F {\displaystyle E/F} is not a Galois extension, then the Galois group of E / F {\displaystyle E/F}

4070-725: Is irreducible from Eisenstein's criterion. Plotting the graph of f {\displaystyle f} with graphing software or paper shows it has three real roots, hence two complex roots, showing its Galois group is S 5 {\displaystyle S_{5}} . Given a global field extension K / k {\displaystyle K/k} (such as Q ( 3 5 , ζ 5 ) / Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} ({\sqrt[{5}]{3}},\zeta _{5})/\mathbb {Q} } ) and equivalence classes of valuations w {\displaystyle w} on K {\displaystyle K} (such as

4180-417: Is isomorphic to S 3 , the dihedral group of order 6 , and L is in fact the splitting field of x 3 − 2 {\displaystyle x^{3}-2} over Q . {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} .} The Quaternion group can be found as the Galois group of a field extension of Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} } . For example,

4290-415: Is minimal among all such fields. One of the important structure theorems from Galois theory comes from the fundamental theorem of Galois theory . This states that given a finite Galois extension K / k {\displaystyle K/k} , there is a bijection between the set of subfields k ⊂ E ⊂ K {\displaystyle k\subset E\subset K} and

4400-481: Is not due so much to its size as to the absence of "small" representations. For example, the simple groups A 100 and SL 20 (2) are far larger but easy to calculate with as they have "small" permutation or linear representations. Alternating groups , such as A 100 , have permutation representations that are "small" compared to the size of the group, and all finite simple groups of Lie type , such as SL 20 (2), have linear representations that are "small" compared to

4510-409: Is not much help however, because nobody has found a "really simple and natural construction of the monster vertex algebra". Wilson with collaborators found a method of performing calculations with the monster that was considerably faster, although now superseded by Seysen's abovementioned work. Let V be a 196,882 dimensional vector space over the field with 2 elements. A large subgroup H (preferably

Monster group - Misplaced Pages Continue

4620-416: Is one dimension lower than the 196,883-dimensional representation in characteristic 0. Performing calculations with these matrices was possible but is too expensive in terms of time and storage space to be useful, as each such matrix occupies over four and a half gigabytes. Wilson asserts that the best description of the monster is to say, "It is the automorphism group of the monster vertex algebra ". This

4730-410: Is reduced. The "hierarchy" of algebraic objects (in terms of generality) creates a hierarchy of the corresponding theories: for instance, the theorems of group theory may be used when studying rings (algebraic objects that have two binary operations with certain axioms) since a ring is a group over one of its operations. In general there is a balance between the amount of generality and the richness of

4840-435: Is restricted to a ≥ b {\displaystyle a\geq b} , in symbolical algebra all rules of operations hold with no restrictions. Using this Peacock could show laws such as ( − a ) ( − b ) = a b {\displaystyle (-a)(-b)=ab} , by letting a = 0 , c = 0 {\displaystyle a=0,c=0} in (

4950-446: Is sometimes defined as Aut ⁡ ( K / F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Aut} (K/F)} , where K {\displaystyle K} is the Galois closure of E {\displaystyle E} . Another definition of the Galois group comes from the Galois group of a polynomial f ∈ F [ x ] {\displaystyle f\in F[x]} . If there

5060-411: Is the trivial group that has a single element, namely the identity automorphism. Another example of a Galois group which is trivial is Aut ⁡ ( R / Q ) . {\displaystyle \operatorname {Aut} (\mathbb {R} /\mathbb {Q} ).} Indeed, it can be shown that any automorphism of R {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } must preserve

5170-517: The p {\displaystyle p} -adic valuation ) and v {\displaystyle v} on k {\displaystyle k} such that their completions give a Galois field extension K w / k v {\displaystyle K_{w}/k_{v}} of local fields , there is an induced action of the Galois group G = Gal ⁡ ( K / k ) {\displaystyle G=\operatorname {Gal} (K/k)} on

5280-522: The Fischer group Fi 24 , the baby monster, and the Conway group Co 1 . The Schur multiplier and the outer automorphism group of the monster are both trivial . The minimal degree of a faithful complex representation is 47 × 59 × 71 = 196,883, hence is the product of the three largest prime divisors of the order of M. The smallest faithful linear representation over any field has dimension 196,882 over

5390-569: The Galois fields of order q {\displaystyle q} and q n {\displaystyle q^{n}} respectively, then Gal ⁡ ( E / F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Gal} (E/F)} is cyclic of order n and generated by the Frobenius homomorphism . The field extension Q ( 2 , 3 ) / Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} ({\sqrt {2}},{\sqrt {3}})/\mathbb {Q} }

5500-510: The Gaussian integers and showed that they form a unique factorization domain (UFD) and proved the biquadratic reciprocity law. Jacobi and Eisenstein at around the same time proved a cubic reciprocity law for the Eisenstein integers . The study of Fermat's last theorem led to the algebraic integers . In 1847, Gabriel Lamé thought he had proven FLT, but his proof was faulty as he assumed all

5610-585: The Jordan–Hölder theorem . Dedekind and Miller independently characterized Hamiltonian groups and introduced the notion of the commutator of two elements. Burnside, Frobenius, and Molien created the representation theory of finite groups at the end of the nineteenth century. J. A. de Séguier's 1905 monograph Elements of the Theory of Abstract Groups presented many of these results in an abstract, general form, relegating "concrete" groups to an appendix, although it

SECTION 50

#1732876567760

5720-438: The cyclotomic fields were UFDs, yet as Kummer pointed out, Q ( ζ 23 ) ) {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} (\zeta _{23}))} was not a UFD. In 1846 and 1847 Kummer introduced ideal numbers and proved unique factorization into ideal primes for cyclotomic fields. Dedekind extended this in 1871 to show that every nonzero ideal in the domain of integers of an algebraic number field

5830-581: The direct method in the calculus of variations . In the 1860s and 1870s, Clebsch, Gordan, Brill, and especially M. Noether studied algebraic functions and curves. In particular, Noether studied what conditions were required for a polynomial to be an element of the ideal generated by two algebraic curves in the polynomial ring R [ x , y ] {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} [x,y]} , although Noether did not use this modern language. In 1882 Dedekind and Weber, in analogy with Dedekind's earlier work on algebraic number theory, created

5940-480: The integers mod p , where p is a prime number. Galois extended this in 1830 to finite fields with p n {\displaystyle p^{n}} elements. In 1871 Richard Dedekind introduced, for a set of real or complex numbers that is closed under the four arithmetic operations, the German word Körper , which means "body" or "corpus" (to suggest an organically closed entity). The English term "field"

6050-472: The multiplicative group of integers modulo n , and the more general concepts of cyclic groups and abelian groups . Klein's 1872 Erlangen program studied geometry and led to symmetry groups such as the Euclidean group and the group of projective transformations . In 1874 Lie introduced the theory of Lie groups , aiming for "the Galois theory of differential equations". In 1876 Poincaré and Klein introduced

6160-400: The ordering of the real numbers and hence must be the identity. Consider the field K = Q ( 2 3 ) . {\displaystyle K=\mathbb {Q} ({\sqrt[{3}]{2}}).} The group Aut ⁡ ( K / Q ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Aut} (K/\mathbb {Q} )} contains only the identity automorphism. This

6270-433: The 1890s Cartan, Frobenius, and Molien proved (independently) that a finite-dimensional associative algebra over R {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } or C {\displaystyle \mathbb {C} } uniquely decomposes into the direct sums of a nilpotent algebra and a semisimple algebra that is the product of some number of simple algebras , square matrices over division algebras. Cartan

6380-800: The 19th century. For example, results about various groups of permutations came to be seen as instances of general theorems that concern a general notion of an abstract group . Questions of structure and classification of various mathematical objects came to forefront. These processes were occurring throughout all of mathematics, but became especially pronounced in algebra. Formal definition through primitive operations and axioms were proposed for many basic algebraic structures, such as groups , rings , and fields . Hence such things as group theory and ring theory took their places in pure mathematics . The algebraic investigations of general fields by Ernst Steinitz and of commutative and then general rings by David Hilbert , Emil Artin and Emmy Noether , building on

6490-424: The Galois group is equal to the degree of the field extension; that is, A useful tool for determining the Galois group of a polynomial comes from Eisenstein's criterion . If a polynomial f ∈ F [ x ] {\displaystyle f\in F[x]} factors into irreducible polynomials f = f 1 ⋯ f k {\displaystyle f=f_{1}\cdots f_{k}}

6600-535: The Galois group is isomorphic to Z / 4 Z {\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} /4\mathbb {Z} } . Consider now L = Q ( 2 3 , ω ) , {\displaystyle L=\mathbb {Q} ({\sqrt[{3}]{2}},\omega ),} where ω {\displaystyle \omega } is a primitive cube root of unity . The group Gal ⁡ ( L / Q ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Gal} (L/\mathbb {Q} )}

6710-469: The Galois group of f {\displaystyle f} can be determined using the Galois groups of each f i {\displaystyle f_{i}} since the Galois group of f {\displaystyle f} contains each of the Galois groups of the f i . {\displaystyle f_{i}.} Gal ⁡ ( F / F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Gal} (F/F)}

SECTION 60

#1732876567760

6820-419: The degree of the field is equal to the degree of the polynomial, these automorphisms generate the Galois group. If n = p 1 a 1 ⋯ p k a k , {\displaystyle n=p_{1}^{a_{1}}\cdots p_{k}^{a_{k}},} then If n {\displaystyle n} is a prime p {\displaystyle p} , then

6930-473: The existence of such a representation was announced by Norton , though he never published the details. Griess, Meierfrankenfeld, and Segev gave the first complete published proof of the uniqueness of the monster (more precisely, they showed that a group with the same centralizers of involutions as the monster is isomorphic to the monster). The monster was a culmination of the development of sporadic simple groups and can be built from any two of three subquotients:

7040-570: The existence of the monster in 1982, has called those 20 groups the happy family , and the remaining six exceptions pariahs . It is difficult to give a good constructive definition of the monster because of its complexity. Martin Gardner wrote a popular account of the monster group in his June 1980 Mathematical Games column in Scientific American . The monster was predicted by Bernd Fischer (unpublished, about 1973) and Robert Griess as

7150-563: The existing work on concrete systems. Masazo Sono's 1917 definition was the first equivalent to the present one. In 1920, Emmy Noether , in collaboration with W. Schmeidler, published a paper about the theory of ideals in which they defined left and right ideals in a ring . The following year she published a landmark paper called Idealtheorie in Ringbereichen ( Ideal theory in rings' ), analyzing ascending chain conditions with regard to (mathematical) ideals. The publication gave rise to

7260-603: The field F {\displaystyle F} . Note this group is a topological group . Some basic examples include Gal ⁡ ( Q ¯ / Q ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Gal} ({\overline {\mathbb {Q} }}/\mathbb {Q} )} and Another readily computable example comes from the field extension Q ( 2 , 3 , 5 , … ) / Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} ({\sqrt {2}},{\sqrt {3}},{\sqrt {5}},\ldots )/\mathbb {Q} } containing

7370-623: The field extension has the prescribed Galois group. If f {\displaystyle f} is an irreducible polynomial of prime degree p {\displaystyle p} with rational coefficients and exactly two non-real roots, then the Galois group of f {\displaystyle f} is the full symmetric group S p . {\displaystyle S_{p}.} For example, f ( x ) = x 5 − 4 x + 2 ∈ Q [ x ] {\displaystyle f(x)=x^{5}-4x+2\in \mathbb {Q} [x]}

7480-566: The field extensions Q ( a ) / Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} ({\sqrt {a}})/\mathbb {Q} } for a square-free element a ∈ Q {\displaystyle a\in \mathbb {Q} } each have a unique degree 2 {\displaystyle 2} automorphism, inducing an automorphism in Aut ⁡ ( C / Q ) . {\displaystyle \operatorname {Aut} (\mathbb {C} /\mathbb {Q} ).} One of

7590-409: The field with two elements, only one less than the dimension of the smallest faithful complex representation. The smallest faithful permutation representation of the monster is on points. The monster can be realized as a Galois group over the rational numbers , and as a Hurwitz group . The monster is unusual among simple groups in that there is no known easy way to represent its elements. This

7700-478: The following axioms . Because of its generality, abstract algebra is used in many fields of mathematics and science. For instance, algebraic topology uses algebraic objects to study topologies. The Poincaré conjecture , proved in 2003, asserts that the fundamental group of a manifold, which encodes information about connectedness, can be used to determine whether a manifold is a sphere or not. Algebraic number theory studies various number rings that generalize

7810-450: The following defining axioms (c.f. Group (mathematics) § Definition ): Identity : there exists an element e {\displaystyle e} such that, for each element a {\displaystyle a} in G {\displaystyle G} , it holds that e ⋅ a = a ⋅ e = a {\displaystyle e\cdot a=a\cdot e=a} . Inverse : for each element

7920-420: The formal axiomatic definitions of various algebraic structures such as groups, rings, and fields. This historical development is almost the opposite of the treatment found in popular textbooks, such as van der Waerden's Moderne Algebra , which start each chapter with a formal definition of a structure and then follow it with concrete examples. The study of polynomial equations or algebraic equations has

8030-404: The group of Möbius transformations , and its subgroups such as the modular group and Fuchsian group , based on work on automorphic functions in analysis. The abstract concept of group emerged slowly over the middle of the nineteenth century. Galois in 1832 was the first to use the term "group", signifying a collection of permutations closed under composition. Arthur Cayley 's 1854 paper On

8140-442: The groups 3.Fi 24 ′ , 2.B, and M, where these are (3/2/1-fold central extensions) of the Fischer group , baby monster group , and monster. These are the sporadic groups associated with centralizers of elements of type 1A, 2A, and 3A in the monster, and the order of the extension corresponds to the symmetries of the diagram. See ADE classification: trinities for further connections (of McKay correspondence type), including (for

8250-451: The identity automorphism and the complex conjugation automorphism. The degree two field extension Q ( 2 ) / Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} ({\sqrt {2}})/\mathbb {Q} } has the Galois group Gal ⁡ ( Q ( 2 ) / Q ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Gal} (\mathbb {Q} ({\sqrt {2}})/\mathbb {Q} )} with two elements,

8360-411: The identity automorphism and the automorphism σ {\displaystyle \sigma } which exchanges 2 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}} and − 2 {\displaystyle -{\sqrt {2}}} . This example generalizes for a prime number p ∈ N . {\displaystyle p\in \mathbb {N} .} Using

8470-421: The knowledge of abstract field theory accumulated so far. He axiomatically defined fields with the modern definition, classified them by their characteristic , and proved many theorems commonly seen today. The end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century saw a shift in the methodology of mathematics. Abstract algebra emerged around the start of the 20th century, under the name modern algebra . Its study

8580-437: The late 18th century. However, European mathematicians, for the most part, resisted these concepts until the middle of the 19th century. George Peacock 's 1830 Treatise of Algebra was the first attempt to place algebra on a strictly symbolic basis. He distinguished a new symbolical algebra , distinct from the old arithmetical algebra . Whereas in arithmetical algebra a − b {\displaystyle a-b}

8690-434: The lattice structure of Galois groups, for non-equal prime numbers p 1 , … , p k {\displaystyle p_{1},\ldots ,p_{k}} the Galois group of Q ( p 1 , … , p k ) / Q {\displaystyle \mathbb {Q} \left({\sqrt {p_{1}}},\ldots ,{\sqrt {p_{k}}}\right)/\mathbb {Q} }

8800-404: The modern laws for a finite abelian group . Weber's 1882 definition of a group was a closed binary operation that was associative and had left and right cancellation. Walther von Dyck in 1882 was the first to require inverse elements as part of the definition of a group. Once this abstract group concept emerged, results were reformulated in this abstract setting. For example, Sylow's theorem

8910-575: The monster and the extended Dynkin diagrams E ~ 8 {\displaystyle {\tilde {E}}_{8}} specifically between the nodes of the diagram and certain conjugacy classes in the monster, known as McKay's E 8 observation . This is then extended to a relation between the extended diagrams E ~ 6 , E ~ 7 , E ~ 8 {\displaystyle {\tilde {E}}_{6},{\tilde {E}}_{7},{\tilde {E}}_{8}} and

9020-507: The monster as the Friendly Giant, but this name has not been generally adopted. John Conway and Jacques Tits subsequently simplified this construction. Griess's construction showed that the monster exists. Thompson showed that its uniqueness (as a simple group satisfying certain conditions coming from the classification of finite simple groups) would follow from the existence of a 196,883-dimensional faithful representation . A proof of

9130-656: The monster group is visible as the automorphism group of the monster module , a vertex operator algebra , an infinite dimensional algebra containing the Griess algebra, and acts on the monster Lie algebra , a generalized Kac–Moody algebra . Many mathematicians, including Conway, have seen the monster as a beautiful and still mysterious object. Conway said of the monster group: "There's never been any kind of explanation of why it's there, and it's obviously not there just by coincidence. It's got too many intriguing properties for it all to be just an accident." Simon P. Norton , an expert on

9240-636: The monster group. The monster contains 20 of the 26 sporadic groups as subquotients. This diagram, based on one in the book Symmetry and the Monster by Mark Ronan , shows how they fit together. The lines signify inclusion, as a subquotient, of the lower group by the upper one. The circled symbols denote groups not involved in larger sporadic groups. For the sake of clarity redundant inclusions are not shown. The monster has 46 conjugacy classes of maximal subgroups . Non-abelian simple groups of some 60 isomorphism types are found as subgroups or as quotients of subgroups. The largest alternating group represented

9350-402: The monster) with the rather small simple group PSL (2,11) and with the 120 tritangent planes of a canonic sextic curve of genus 4 known as Bring's curve . The monster group is one of two principal constituents in the monstrous moonshine conjecture by Conway and Norton, which relates discrete and non-discrete mathematics and was finally proved by Richard Borcherds in 1992. In this setting,

9460-569: The monster, a 194-by-194 array, was calculated in 1979 by Fischer and Donald Livingstone using computer programs written by Michael Thorne. It was not clear in the 1970s whether the monster actually existed. Griess constructed M as the automorphism group of the Griess algebra , a 196,883-dimensional commutative nonassociative algebra over the real numbers; he first announced his construction in Ann Arbor on January 14, 1980. In his 1982 paper, he referred to

9570-411: The most studied classes of infinite Galois group is the absolute Galois group , which is an infinite, profinite group defined as the inverse limit of all finite Galois extensions E / F {\displaystyle E/F} for a fixed field. The inverse limit is denoted where F ¯ {\displaystyle {\overline {F}}} is the separable closure of

9680-398: The operation of function composition . This group is sometimes denoted by Aut ⁡ ( E / F ) . {\displaystyle \operatorname {Aut} (E/F).} If E / F {\displaystyle E/F} is a Galois extension , then Aut ⁡ ( E / F ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Aut} (E/F)}

9790-407: The order of an element of the monster). Wilson has exhibited vectors u and v whose joint stabilizer is the trivial group. Thus (for example) one can calculate the order of an element g of the monster by finding the smallest i > 0 such that g u = u and g v = v . This and similar constructions (in different characteristics ) were used to find some of the non-local maximal subgroups of

9900-529: The other. He also defined the Peirce decomposition . Frobenius in 1878 and Charles Sanders Peirce in 1881 independently proved that the only finite-dimensional division algebras over R {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} } were the real numbers, the complex numbers, and the quaternions. In the 1880s Killing and Cartan showed that semisimple Lie algebras could be decomposed into simple ones, and classified all simple Lie algebras. Inspired by this, in

10010-408: The properties of the monster group, is quoted as saying, "I can explain what Monstrous Moonshine is in one sentence, it is the voice of God." Abstract algebra Algebraic structures, with their associated homomorphisms , form mathematical categories . Category theory gives a unified framework to study properties and constructions that are similar for various structures. Universal algebra

10120-478: The real and complex numbers in 1854 and square matrices in two papers of 1855 and 1858. Once there were sufficient examples, it remained to classify them. In an 1870 monograph, Benjamin Peirce classified the more than 150 hypercomplex number systems of dimension below 6, and gave an explicit definition of an associative algebra . He defined nilpotent and idempotent elements and proved that any algebra contains one or

10230-454: The roots of f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(x)} are exp ⁡ ( 2 k π i 5 ) . {\displaystyle \exp \left({\tfrac {2k\pi i}{5}}\right).} There are automorphisms generating a group of order 4 {\displaystyle 4} . Since σ 2 {\displaystyle \sigma _{2}} generates this group,

10340-574: The set of equivalence classes of valuations such that the completions of the fields are compatible. This means if s ∈ G {\displaystyle s\in G} then there is an induced isomorphism of local fields s w : K w → K s w {\displaystyle s_{w}:K_{w}\to K_{sw}} Since we have taken the hypothesis that w {\displaystyle w} lies over v {\displaystyle v} (i.e. there

10450-417: The set of integers. Using tools of algebraic number theory, Andrew Wiles proved Fermat's Last Theorem . In physics, groups are used to represent symmetry operations, and the usage of group theory could simplify differential equations. In gauge theory , the requirement of local symmetry can be used to deduce the equations describing a system. The groups that describe those symmetries are Lie groups , and

10560-603: The size of the group. All sporadic groups other than the monster also have linear representations small enough that they are easy to work with on a computer (the next hardest case after the monster is the baby monster, with a representation of dimension 4370). Martin Seysen has implemented a fast Python package named mmgroup , which claims to be the first implementation of the monster group where arbitrary operations can effectively be performed. The documentation states that multiplication of group elements takes less than 40 milliseconds on

10670-425: The solutions of algebraic equations . Most theories that are now recognized as parts of abstract algebra started as collections of disparate facts from various branches of mathematics, acquired a common theme that served as a core around which various results were grouped, and finally became unified on a basis of a common set of concepts. This unification occurred in the early decades of the 20th century and resulted in

10780-479: The study of Lie groups and Lie algebras reveals much about the physical system; for instance, the number of force carriers in a theory is equal to the dimension of the Lie algebra, and these bosons interact with the force they mediate if the Lie algebra is nonabelian. Galois group In mathematics , in the area of abstract algebra known as Galois theory , the Galois group of a certain type of field extension

10890-615: The subgroups H ⊂ G . {\displaystyle H\subset G.} Then, E {\displaystyle E} is given by the set of invariants of K {\displaystyle K} under the action of H {\displaystyle H} , so Moreover, if H {\displaystyle H} is a normal subgroup then G / H ≅ Gal ⁡ ( E / k ) {\displaystyle G/H\cong \operatorname {Gal} (E/k)} . And conversely, if E / k {\displaystyle E/k}

11000-461: The term " Noetherian ring ", and several other mathematical objects being called Noetherian . Noted algebraist Irving Kaplansky called this work "revolutionary"; results which seemed inextricably connected to properties of polynomial rings were shown to follow from a single axiom. Artin, inspired by Noether's work, came up with the descending chain condition . These definitions marked the birth of abstract ring theory. In 1801 Gauss introduced

11110-453: The theory of groups defined a group as a set with an associative composition operation and the identity 1, today called a monoid . In 1870 Kronecker defined an abstract binary operation that was closed, commutative, associative, and had the left cancellation property b ≠ c → a ⋅ b ≠ a ⋅ c {\displaystyle b\neq c\to a\cdot b\neq a\cdot c} , similar to

11220-489: The theory: more general structures have usually fewer nontrivial theorems and fewer applications. Examples of algebraic structures with a single binary operation are: Examples involving several operations include: A group is a set G {\displaystyle G} together with a "group product", a binary operation ⋅ : G × G → G {\displaystyle \cdot :G\times G\rightarrow G} . The group satisfies

11330-429: The two-volume monograph published in 1930–1931 that reoriented the idea of algebra from the theory of equations to the theory of algebraic structures . By abstracting away various amounts of detail, mathematicians have defined various algebraic structures that are used in many areas of mathematics. For instance, almost all systems studied are sets , to which the theorems of set theory apply. Those sets that have

11440-504: The vertical arrows are isomorphisms. This gives a technique for constructing Galois groups of local fields using global Galois groups. A basic example of a field extension with an infinite group of automorphisms is Aut ⁡ ( C / Q ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Aut} (\mathbb {C} /\mathbb {Q} )} , since it contains every algebraic field extension E / Q {\displaystyle E/\mathbb {Q} } . For example,

11550-466: The work of Ernst Kummer , Leopold Kronecker and Richard Dedekind , who had considered ideals in commutative rings, and of Georg Frobenius and Issai Schur , concerning representation theory of groups, came to define abstract algebra. These developments of the last quarter of the 19th century and the first quarter of 20th century were systematically exposed in Bartel van der Waerden 's Moderne Algebra ,

11660-488: Was introduced by Moore in 1893. In 1881 Leopold Kronecker defined what he called a domain of rationality , which is a field of rational fractions in modern terms. The first clear definition of an abstract field was due to Heinrich Martin Weber in 1893. It was missing the associative law for multiplication, but covered finite fields and the fields of algebraic number theory and algebraic geometry. In 1910 Steinitz synthesized

11770-676: Was limited to finite groups. The first monograph on both finite and infinite abstract groups was O. K. Schmidt's 1916 Abstract Theory of Groups . Noncommutative ring theory began with extensions of the complex numbers to hypercomplex numbers , specifically William Rowan Hamilton 's quaternions in 1843. Many other number systems followed shortly. In 1844, Hamilton presented biquaternions , Cayley introduced octonions , and Grassman introduced exterior algebras . James Cockle presented tessarines in 1848 and coquaternions in 1849. William Kingdon Clifford introduced split-biquaternions in 1873. In addition Cayley introduced group algebras over

11880-451: Was part of the drive for more intellectual rigor in mathematics. Initially, the assumptions in classical algebra , on which the whole of mathematics (and major parts of the natural sciences ) depend, took the form of axiomatic systems . No longer satisfied with establishing properties of concrete objects, mathematicians started to turn their attention to general theory. Formal definitions of certain algebraic structures began to emerge in

11990-411: Was reproven by Frobenius in 1887 directly from the laws of a finite group, although Frobenius remarked that the theorem followed from Cauchy's theorem on permutation groups and the fact that every finite group is a subgroup of a permutation group. Otto Hölder was particularly prolific in this area, defining quotient groups in 1889, group automorphisms in 1893, as well as simple groups. He also completed

12100-457: Was the first to define concepts such as direct sum and simple algebra, and these concepts proved quite influential. In 1907 Wedderburn extended Cartan's results to an arbitrary field, in what are now called the Wedderburn principal theorem and Artin–Wedderburn theorem . For commutative rings, several areas together led to commutative ring theory. In two papers in 1828 and 1832, Gauss formulated

#759240