Misplaced Pages

#165834

39-582: E-sign or esign may refer to: Electronic signature Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act , a United States federal law ESign (India) , an electronic signature service Estimated sign (℮), in the European Union See also [ edit ] E-Mark (disambiguation) Topics referred to by the same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with

78-574: A qualified signature creation device (QSCD). This device is responsible for qualifying digital signatures by using specific hardware and software that ensures that only the signatory has control of their private key. In addition, a qualified trust service provider manages the signature creation data that is produced. The signature creation data must remain unique, confidential and protected from forgery. Qualified electronic signatures that comply with eIDAS may be technically implemented through three specific digital signature standards, that were developed by

117-465: A contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record." It may be an electronic transmission of the document which contains the signature, as in the case of facsimile transmissions, or it may be encoded message, such as telegraphy using Morse code . In the United States, the definition of what qualifies as an electronic signature is wide and is set out in

156-477: A digital certificate, which has been encrypted through a security signature-creating device and which has been authenticated by a qualified trust service provider . Since well before the American Civil War began in 1861, morse code was used to send messages electrically via the telegraph. Some of these messages were agreements to terms that were intended as enforceable contracts . An early acceptance of

195-431: A generic electronic signature as "a signature that consists of one or more letters, characters, numbers or other symbols in digital form incorporated in, attached to or associated with an electronic document," then defining a secure electronic signature as an electronic signature with specific properties. PIPEDA's secure electronic signature regulations refine the definition as being a digital signature applied and verified in

234-455: A higher level of technical security. The increased transparency in the electronic signing and transaction process and the enhanced interoperability are expected to spur innovation in the European internal market . eIDAS requires that no electronic signature should be denied legal effect or admissibility as evidence solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet

273-527: A legal concept distinct from digital signatures , a cryptographic mechanism often used to implement electronic signatures. While an electronic signature can be as simple as a name entered in an electronic document, digital signatures are increasingly used in e-commerce and in regulatory filings to implement electronic signatures in a cryptographically protected way. Standardization agencies like NIST or ETSI provide standards for their implementation (e.g., NIST-DSS , XAdES or PAdES ). The concept itself

312-576: A little lower, 53% of "best-in-class" respondents in each case. Digital signatures are cryptographic implementations of electronic signatures used as a proof of authenticity , data integrity and non-repudiation of communications conducted over the Internet . When implemented in compliance to digital signature standards, digital signing should offer end-to-end privacy with the signing process being user-friendly and secure. Digital signatures are generated and verified through standardized frameworks such as

351-531: A mechanism for functional equivalence between electronic and handwritten signatures at the international level as well as for the cross-border recognition. The latest UNCITRAL text dealing with electronic signatures is article 16 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on the Use and Cross-border Recognition of Identity Management and Trust Services (2022). Canadian law ( PIPEDA ) attempts to clarify the situation by first defining

390-646: A signatory would sign a document or message and then return it to the intended recipient via the postal service, facsimile service, by hand or by scanning and then attaching it to an email. The issue with these methods is that they are not always secure or timely. Delays in delivery could occur, and there exists the possibility that signatures could be forged or the enclosed documents may be altered. The risk increases as multiple signatures are required from different people who may be located in different locations. These problems are alleviated by using qualified electronic signatures, which save time, are legally binding, and provide

429-613: A specific manner. In the European Union , EU Regulation No 910/2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the European internal market ( eIDAS ) sets the legal frame for electronic signatures. It repeals Directive 1999/93/EC. The current and applicable version of eIDAS was published by the European Parliament and the European Council on July 23, 2014. Following Article 25 (1) of

SECTION 10

#1733085659166

468-459: A transaction. Definitions of electronic signatures vary depending on the applicable jurisdiction . A common denominator in most countries is the level of an advanced electronic signature requiring that: Electronic signatures may be created with increasing levels of security, with each having its own set of requirements and means of creation on various levels that prove the validity of the signature. To provide an even stronger probative value than

507-418: Is not new, with common law jurisdictions having recognized telegraph signatures as far back as the mid-19th century and faxed signatures since the 1980s. The USA's E-Sign Act , signed June 30, 2000 by President Clinton was described months later as "more like a seal than a signature." An electronic signature is intended to provide a secure and accurate identification method for the signatory during

546-424: Is one such standard that has been outlined under eIDAS. A qualified electronic signature is an advanced electronic signature with a qualified digital certificate that has been created by a qualified signature creation device (QSCD). For an electronic signature to be considered as a qualified electronic signature, it must meet three main requirements: First, the signatory must be linked and uniquely identified to

585-482: Is recognised as "not necessarily the writing in of a name, but maybe any mark which identifies it as the act of the party.” Under the Electronic Transactions Acts in each Federal, State and Territory jurisdiction, an electronic signature may be considered enforceable if (a) there was a method used to identify the person and to indicate that person’s intention in respect of the information communicated and

624-510: Is to ensure the validity and legal effect of contracts entered electronically. For instance, In 2016, Aberdeen Strategy and Research reported that 73% of "best-in-class" and 34% of all other respondents surveyed made use of electronic signature processes in supply chain and procurement , delivering benefits in the speed and efficiency of key procurement activities. The percentages of their survey respondents using electronic signatures in accounts payable and accounts receivable processes were

663-502: Is to serve several purposes, such as the facilitation of business and public services processes, including those that go across borders. These processes can be safely expedited using electronic signing. Under eIDAS, EU member states have been charged with establishing "points of single contact" (PSCs) for trust services to ensure that electronic ID schemes may be used in cross-border public sector transactions, such as exchanging and accessing healthcare information across borders. Previously,

702-588: The Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) by NIST or in compliance to the XAdES , PAdES or CAdES standards, specified by the ETSI . There are typically three algorithms involved with the digital signature process: The process of digital signing requires that its accompanying public key can then authenticate the signature generated by both the fixed message and private key. Using these cryptographic algorithms,

741-594: The Digital Signature Standard (DSS) by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the eIDAS Regulation enacted by the European Parliament . OpenPGP is a non-proprietary protocol for email encryption through public key cryptography . It is supported by PGP and GnuPG , and some of the S/MIME IETF standards and has evolved into the most popular email encryption standard in

780-555: The Uniform Electronic Transactions Act ("UETA") released by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) in 1999. It was influenced by ABA committee white papers and the uniform law promulgated by NCCUSL. Under UETA, the term means "an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign

819-517: The internal European market . It enables to verify the authorship of a declaration in electronic data exchange over long periods of time. Qualified electronic signatures can be considered as a digital equivalent to handwritten signatures. The purpose of eIDAS was to create a set of standards to ensure that electronic signatures could be used in a secure manner while conducting business online or while conducting official business across borders between EU member states . The qualified electronic signature

SECTION 20

#1733085659166

858-599: The European Telecommunications Standards Institute ( ETSI ) and then need to be complemented with a qualified digital certificate through the procedures described above: ; The qualified trust service provider has a crucial role in the process of qualified electronic signing. A trust service provider must receive qualified status from a supervisory governmental body that allows the entity to provide qualified trust services to be used in creating qualified electronic signatures. Regulated in eIDAS,

897-537: The European Union published an EU Trust List with constitutive effect, meaning that a provider or service will only be qualified if it appears in the Trusted List. Qualified trust service providers are required to abide by the strict guidelines outlined under the eIDAS Regulation, which include as part of the certificate creation process: Under eIDAS, the intent of the implementation of qualified electronic signatures

936-429: The above described advanced electronic signature, some countries like member states of the European Union or Switzerland introduced the qualified electronic signature. It is difficult to challenge the authorship of a statement signed with a qualified electronic signature - the statement is non-repudiable . Technically, a qualified electronic signature is implemented through an advanced electronic signature that utilizes

975-465: The case of a user's face image, researchers in Vietnam successfully demonstrated in late 2017 how a specially crafted mask could beat Apple's Face ID on iPhone X . Qualified electronic signature#Qualified trust service providers A qualified electronic signature is an electronic signature that is compliant with EU Regulation No 910/2014 ( eIDAS Regulation) for electronic transactions within

1014-427: The eIDAS regulation, an advanced electronic signature shall “not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings". However it will reach a higher probative value when enhanced to the level of a qualified electronic signature . By requiring the use of a qualified electronic signature creation device and being based on a certificate that has been issued by a qualified trust service provider,

1053-406: The enforceability of telegraphic messages as electronic signatures came from a New Hampshire Supreme Court case, Howley v. Whipple, in 1869. In the 1980s, many companies and even some individuals began using fax machines for high-priority or time-sensitive delivery of documents. Although the original signature on the original document was on paper, the image of the signature and its transmission

1092-561: The method was either: (i) as reliable as appropriate for the purpose for which the electronic communication was generated or communicated, in light of all the circumstances, including the relevant agreement; or (ii) proven in fact to have fulfilled the functions above by itself or together with further evidence and the person to whom the signature is required to be given consents to that method. Various laws have been passed internationally to facilitate commerce by using electronic records and signatures in interstate and foreign commerce. The intent

1131-475: The package, and signing electronic documents online. The first agreement signed electronically by two sovereign nations was a Joint Communiqué recognizing the growing importance of the promotion of electronic commerce, signed by the United States and Ireland in 1998. In 1996 the United Nations published the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce. Article 7 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce

1170-433: The person who purportedly signed a document was actually the person who did. For example, a replay of the electronic signal produced and submitted to the computer system responsible for 'affixing' a signature to a document can be collected via wiretapping techniques. Many commercially available fingerprint sensors have low resolution and can be deceived with inexpensive household items (for example, gummy bear candy gel). In

1209-544: The record." This definition and many other core concepts of UETA are echoed in the U.S. ESign Act of 2000. 48 US states, the District of Columbia, and the US Virgin Islands have enacted UETA. Only New York and Illinois have not enacted UETA, but each of those states has adopted its own electronic signatures statute. As of June 11, 2020, Washington State Office of CIO adopted UETA. In Australia, an electronic signature

E-sign - Misplaced Pages Continue

1248-591: The requirements for qualified electronic signatures. The qualified electronic signature shall have the equivalent legal effect as a handwritten signature. Its evidentiary value depends on the circumstances, but will normally be considered very high. All EU member states are required to recognize a qualified electronic signature as valid, as long as it has been created with a qualified certificate that has been issued by another member state. Under eIDAS Regulation, Article 27, Electronic signatures in public services , member states are prohibited from requesting signatures of

1287-471: The signature. The second point is that data used to create the signature must be under the sole control of the signatory. And last it must have the ability to identify if the data that accompanies the signature has been tampered with since the signing of the message. It is important to note that creating a qualified electronic signature is more than merely adding a qualified certificate to an advanced electronic signature. The signature must also be created using

1326-477: The title E-sign . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=E-sign&oldid=1002014430 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Electronic signature Electronic signatures are

1365-535: The upgraded advanced signature then carries according to Article 25 (2) of the eIDAS Regulation the same legal value as a handwritten signature. However, this is only regulated in the European Union and similarly through ZertES in Switzerland . A qualified electronic signature is not defined in the United States. The U.S. Code defines an electronic signature for the purpose of US law as "an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with

1404-418: The user's signature cannot be replicated without having access to their private key. A secure channel is not typically required. By applying asymmetric cryptography methods, the digital signature process prevents several common attacks where the attacker attempts to gain access through the following attack methods. The most relevant standards on digital signatures with respect to size of domestic markets are

1443-801: The world. An electronic signature may also refer to electronic forms of processing or verifying identity through the use of biometric "signatures" or biologically identifying qualities of an individual. Such signatures use the approach of attaching some biometric measurement to a document as evidence. Biometric signatures include fingerprints, hand geometry (finger lengths and palm size), iris patterns , voice characteristics , retinal patterns, or any other human body property. All of these are collected using electronic sensors of some kind. Biometric measurements of this type are useless as passwords because they can't be changed if compromised. However, they might be serviceable, except that to date, they have been so easily deceived that they can carry little assurance that

1482-424: Was electronic. Courts in various jurisdictions have decided that enforceable legality of electronic signatures can include agreements made by email, entering a personal identification number (PIN) into a bank ATM , signing a credit or debit slip with a digital pen pad device (an application of graphics tablet technology) at a point of sale , installing software with a clickwrap software license agreement on

1521-592: Was highly influential in the development of electronic signature laws around the world, including in the US. In 2001, UNCITRAL concluded work on a dedicated text, the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures, which has been adopted in some 30 jurisdictions. Article 9, paragraph 3 of the United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts , 2005, which establishes

#165834