Misplaced Pages

Doğan Holding

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Doğan Holding is amongst the biggest conglomerates in Turkey operating in the energy, media, industry, trade, insurance and tourism industries. Founded by Aydın Doğan who still is a major shareholder, the company is led by his daughter Begümhan Doğan Faralyalı. Main operating activity of the Holding is to invest in various sectors via associates, to provide all necessary support to its subsidiaries and joint ventures in order to develop their activities.

#787212

26-848: Doğan Trend: Distributor and retailer of prominent cars, motorcycles, outboard marine engines & electrified mobility brands. The group also offers operational leasing, new & used car sales as well as servicing operations. Brands represented by Dogan Trend as of 2022 November: - Cars : Suzuki , MG Motors , Suvmarket used car platform with SUV vertical focus - Motorcycles : Vespa , Piaggio , Aprilia , Moto Guzzi , KYMCO , Silence and Suzuki Motorcycles - Marin : Suzuki Outboards - Mobility : Wallbox Chargers , Bimas E-bikes The company operates with more than 70 dealers & service points across country. On 22 March 2018, Doğan Holding announced to KAP of their intentions to sell their media division to Demirören Group . The sale has been criticized due to Demirören Group's close ties with

52-428: A number of high-profile companies have ceased using offshore entities in their group structure as a result of public campaigns for such companies to pay their "fair share" of Government taxes. Detailed information in relation to the use of offshore companies is notoriously difficult to come by because of the opaque nature of much of the business (and because, in many cases, the companies are used specifically to preserve

78-839: A number of times to ensure that it would not be put into the electronic distribution system to determine which court the case will be heard in. According to claims, Dogan's financial experts spent eight hours in the Tax Court on October 2, 2009, to ensure their case was handed over to a specific preferred court. On September 28, 2009, Turkey's Capital Markets Board SPK, accused Aydın Doğan , Imre Barmanbek , Hanzade Doğan Boyner and Ali Riza Temuroglu for deliberately causing financial losses to Hurriyet Gazetecilik and Dogan Gazetecilik. It claimed that Dogan Holding purchased paper and publishing supplies at higher producer/seller unit prices from offshore companies —Sortal Trading Company Limited and Shawcliff Trading Limited—instead of direct producers. This,

104-527: A total of TL3.76bn ($ 2.5bn) in unpaid taxes and penalties – equivalent to more than four-fifths of the combined market value of Dogan Holding and Dogan Yayin. The fine was issued after an earlier tax penalty of more than $ 500 million was leveled against the group in February for tax irregularities connected to the sale of a 25 percent stake in its television unit to German publisher Axel Springer SE . Three weeks later, Turkey's largest media group Dogan Yayin said it

130-457: Is subject both the U.S. taxation and to financial regulation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission . Another common characteristic of offshore companies is the limited amount of information available to the public. This varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. At one end of the scale, in the Cayman Islands and Delaware, there is virtually no publicly available information. But at

156-418: Is used in at least two distinct and different ways. An offshore company may be a reference to: The former use (companies formed in offshore jurisdictions) is probably the more common usage of the term. In isolated instances, the term can also be used in reference to companies with offshore oil and gas operations. In relation to companies and similar entities which are incorporated in offshore jurisdictions,

182-728: The British Virgin Islands , but the model was copied widely. However, in the early 2000s the OECD launched a global initiative to prevent "ring fencing" of taxation in this manner, and many leading jurisdictions (including the British Virgin Islands and Gibraltar ) repealed their International Business Companies legislation . But IBCs are still incorporated in a number of jurisdictions today including Belize, Seychelles, BVI Anguilla and Panama . Separately from IBCs, there are countries which operate tax regimes which broadly achieve

208-566: The Netherlands and particularly the United Kingdom , in commentary relating to corporate inversion and the use of British Overseas Territories for this purpose. Furthermore, in Federal systems, states which operate like a classic offshore centre can result in corporations formed there being labelled as offshore, even if they form part of the largest economy in the world (for example, Delaware in

234-536: The United Kingdom operates on broadly similar principles in relation to taxation of companies. Separately, there are offshore jurisdictions which simply do not impose any form of taxation on companies, and so their companies are de facto tax-exempt. Historically the best example of these countries were the Cayman Islands and Bermuda , although other countries such as the British Virgin Islands have now moved to this model. These could arguably fit into either of

260-483: The United States ). Historically, offshore companies were broadly divided into two categories. On the one hand were companies which were statutorily exempt from taxation in their jurisdiction of registration, provided that they did not undertake business with persons resident in that jurisdiction. Such companies were usually called International Business Companies , or IBCs. Such companies were largely popularized by

286-453: The OAC must have a representative (registered agent) and office address (registered office) in the county of the incorporation. (4) The OSC must be managed and governed by (an employee of) a local trust or law office. (5) There is an instance of elements that benefit anonymity such as bearer shares and no or limited filing obligations. Although all offshore companies differ to a degree depending upon

SECTION 10

#1732868744788

312-517: The SPK contends, cost Hurriyet Gazetecilik and Dogan Gazetecilik TL 33.12 million (US$ 22.19 million), excluding the interest. The SPK reported that it would take the case to court. 41°1′55″N 29°2′14″E  /  41.03194°N 29.03722°E  / 41.03194; 29.03722 Demir%C3%B6ren Group Demirören Group is a Turkish conglomerate company . Its properties include Milangaz (a liquefied petroleum gas distributor with 9% share of

338-759: The Turkish market), the Demirören İstiklal shopping mall in Taksim Square , as well as several newspapers, television and radio stations, and also a subscription-based streaming service called D-Smart Go. Demirören also handles the licensing and distribution of Turkish Warner Bros. Discovery channels: Cartoon Network and CNN Türk . All shares of the Demirören Group are owned by the Demirören family, who have close ties to President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and are also active in

364-451: The common themes, a number of jurisdictions have also enacted special corporate provisions to try to attract business through offering corporate mechanisms that allow complex business transactions or reorganisations to occur more smoothly. Offshore companies are used for a variety of commercial and private purposes , some legitimate and economically beneficial, whilst others may be harmful or even criminal. Allegations are frequently made in

390-502: The confidentiality of a transaction or individual). It is a commonly held view that most uses of offshore companies are driven by tax mitigation and/or regulatory arbitrage , although there are some suggestions that the amount of tax structuring may be less than commonly thought. Other commonly cited legitimate uses of offshore companies include uses as joint ventures financing SPVs , stock market listing vehicles, holding companies and asset holding structures, and trading vehicles. In

416-467: The corporate law in the relevant jurisdiction, all offshore companies tend to enjoy certain core characteristics: The absence of taxation or regulation in the home jurisdiction does not exempt the relevant company from taxation or regulation abroad. For example, Michael Kors Holdings Limited is incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, but is listed on the New York Stock Exchange , where it

442-458: The death of Erdoğan Demirören  [ tr ] , President Erdoğan visited the family to extend his condolences. The family is generally seen as being supportive of President Erdoğan and the Justice and Development Party . In February 2021, the company took over Azerbaijan 's lottery company ''Azerlotereya''. Offshore company The term "offshore company " or "offshore corporation"

468-520: The energy, mining, and construction sectors. Demirören acquired the newspapers Milliyet and Vatan in May 2011. In 2018, the holding bought the newspaper Hürriyet , Posta and the TV channels Kanal D , CNN Türk , and D-Smart and all other media properties of Doğan Media Group , with the ехception of Kanal D Romania Slow Türk  [ tr ] and Dream Türk Radio Dream FM . Following

494-521: The government. On April 5, 2018, the division was sold to Demirören group. On Sept 3, 1998, the Petrol Ofisi (POAS) privatization tender ended with Akmaya - Orteks Group offering US$ 1.160 billion, Doğuş Holding - Garanti Bank USD 1.150 billion, Türkiye İş Bankası - Bayindir Holding - Park Holding - PUIS Grubu USD 1.110 billion. The Privatization Board of Turkey however preferred Türkiye İş Bankası-Bayindir Holding-Park Holding-PUIS consortium. This

520-865: The other end of the scale, in Hong Kong companies file annual returns with particulars of directors, shareholders and annual accounts. However, even in jurisdictions where there is relatively little information available to the public as of right, most jurisdictions have laws which permit law enforcement authorities (either locally or from overseas) to have access to relevant information, and in some cases, private individuals. In relation to flexible corporate law , most offshore jurisdictions will normally remove corporate fetters such as thin capitalisation rules, financial assistance rules, and limitations on corporate capacity and corporate benefit . A number have also removed or watered down rules relating to maintenance of capital or restrictions on payment of dividends . Beyond

546-503: The press about offshore companies being used for money laundering , tax evasion , fraud , and other forms of white collar crime . Offshore companies are also used in a wide variety of commercial transactions, from generic holding companies, to joint ventures and listing vehicles. Offshore companies are also used widely in connection with private wealth for tax mitigation and privacy. The use of offshore companies, particularly in tax planning , has become controversial in recent years, and

SECTION 20

#1732868744788

572-579: The previous two categories, depending on the fiscal point of view involved. To the Offshore Company definition, applies five (non-cumulative) limiting conditions: (1) The government in the country of incorporation does not levy an indirect tax on the OAC (however, the OSC must pay an annual fee to the government). (2) Separate laws and regulations apply. (3) The OSC doesn't have its own physical office (address), personnel, means of communication etc. This means that

598-450: The same effect: so long as the company's activities are carried on overseas, and none of the profits are repatriated, the company is not subject to taxation in its home jurisdiction. Where the home jurisdiction is regarded as an offshore jurisdiction, such companies are commonly regarded as offshore companies. Examples of this include Hong Kong and Uruguay . However, these tax regimes are not limited to conventional offshore jurisdictions:

624-873: The use of both the words "offshore" and "company" can be varied in application. The extent to which a jurisdiction is regarded as offshore is often a question of perception and degree. Classic tax haven countries such as Bermuda , British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands are quintessentially offshore jurisdictions, and companies incorporated in those jurisdictions are invariably labelled as offshore companies. Thereafter, there are certain small intermediate countries or areas such as Hong Kong , Singapore and Mauritius (sometimes referred to as "mid-shore" jurisdictions) which, whilst having oversized financial centres, are not zero tax regimes. Finally, there are classes of industrialised economies which can be used as part of tax mitigation structures, including countries like Ireland ,

650-459: Was later on cancelled by the court and Dogan Holding won the next bidding process. The case involved serious corruption allegations, with then-Vice Prime Minister Mesut Yılmaz and then-State Minister Isin Celebi accused of abuse of power and Aydın Doğan of manipulating the public opinion through his media network. On Sept 8, 2009, Dogan Yayin said tax authorities wanted companies it controls to pay

676-448: Was officially notified of an increase in a tax fine to 4.8 billion lira ($ 3.22 billion). The Halkali Tax Office had sent notifications to Dogan Yayin, stating movable and immovable properties provided as a guarantee by the firm could be sold at the end of the legal process. Some said that the tax fraud charges were an effort to censor criticism of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan . Dogan's financial specialists and attorneys reclaimed their case file

#787212