Misplaced Pages

Covenant theology

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Christianity • Protestantism

#552447

136-510: Covenant theology (also known as covenantalism , federal theology , or federalism ) is a biblical theology , a conceptual overview and interpretive framework for understanding the overall structure of the Bible . It is often distinguished from dispensational theology , a competing form of biblical theology. It uses the theological concept of a covenant as an organizing principle for Christian theology . The standard form of covenant theology views

272-522: A virtuous life as well: But by your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God's righteous judgment will be revealed. For he will render to every man according to his works: to those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honor and immortality, he will give eternal life; but for those who are factious and do not obey the truth, but obey wickedness, there will be wrath and fury. There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil,

408-536: A Covenant of Works in the writings of those such as Olevianus and Rollock . Additionally, defenders of the merit-based view argue that the concept of this works principle operating in the pre-Fall state in the Garden of Eden as a covenant is present in the early confessions even if the Covenant of Works is not explicitly named. Examples include Belgic Confession, article 14, which speaks of Adam having received and transgressed

544-548: A biblical theology that is "pure and unmixed with foreign elements". Gabler identified two tasks for biblical theology. The first task was to provide an accurate historical description of the ideas found in the Bible. He argued that the interpretation of biblical texts needed to be informed by the language and customs of the relevant historical period. Significantly, Gabler did not assume that the Old Testament and New Testament possessed

680-406: A church that met in the house of Aquila and Priscilla . Verses 14 and 15 each mention groupings of believers and saints. Jews were expelled from Rome because of disturbances around AD 49 by the edict of Claudius . Fitzmyer claims that both Jews and Jewish Christians were expelled as a result of their infighting. Claudius died around the year AD 54, and his successor, Emperor Nero , allowed

816-512: A condition for life with Adam in the Garden of Eden, comparing Adam's works to the works of Christ. He disputed its label as a covenant, however, preferring to call this arrangement the Adamic administration. At Westminster Theological Seminary in the late 1970s, Norman Shepherd , a professor of systematic theology was dismissed due to controversy over his teaching on justification . His views involved

952-425: A covenant of works administered with Adam in the Garden of Eden. Upon Adam's failure, God established the covenant of grace in the promised seed Genesis 3:15 , and shows His redeeming care in clothing Adam and Eve in garments of skin—perhaps picturing the first instance of animal sacrifice. The specific covenants after the fall of Adam are seen as administered under the overarching theological covenant of grace. There

1088-455: A date as early as 51/52 (or 54/55), following on from Knox, who proposed 53/54. Lüdemann is the only serious challenge to the consensus of mid to late 50s. There is strong, albeit indirect, evidence that a recension of Romans that lacked chapters 15 and 16 was widely used in the western half of the Roman Empire until the mid-4th century. This conclusion is partially based on the fact that

1224-659: A deacon of the church in Cenchreae , as the messenger who took the epistle to Rome. Prior to composing the epistle, Paul had evangelized the areas surrounding the Aegean Sea and was eager to take the gospel farther to Spain , a journey that would allow him to visit Rome on the way. The epistle can consequently be understood as a document outlining his reasons for the trip and preparing the church in Rome for his visit. Christians in Rome would have been of both Jewish and Gentile background and it

1360-582: A public epistle . Although sometimes considered a treatise of (systematic) theology, Romans remains silent on many issues that Paul addresses elsewhere, but is nonetheless generally considered substantial, especially on justification and salvation. Proponents of both sola fide and the Roman Catholic position of the necessity of both faith and works find support in Romans. Martin Luther in his translation of

1496-429: A reconfiguration of covenant theology that went beyond those of Murray, his predecessor. Shepherd denied any notion of a works or merit principle, leading to a denial of the imputation of Christ's active obedience to the believer. He argued that Jesus' own justification was due to His faith and obedience. In the same way then, the believer must be justified before God by faith and obedience. Shepherd's followers claim that

SECTION 10

#1733085305553

1632-551: A separate priestly covenant, independent of the Mosaic covenant (which he takes as a prophetic covenant). In taken with the Davidic (kingly) covenant, this represents the three offices of Christ. Van Dorn argues this case on the basis of Nehemiah 13:29 which refers to "the covenant of the priesthood and the Levites", Malachi 2:8 who speaks of "the covenant of Levi," and Jeremiah 33:21 who points to

1768-515: A uniformity in beliefs. Gabler's second task was to compare biblical ideas with each other to discover universal scriptural truths on which dogmatic theology could be based. Taking up Gabler's first task, George Lorenz Bauer wrote separate biblical theologies for the OT (1796) and the NT (1800–1802). This marked the beginning of OT theology and NT theology as independent disciplines. However, Gabler's second task

1904-418: A variety of Church Fathers , such as Origen and Tertullian , refer to a fourteen-chapter edition of Romans, either directly or indirectly. The fact that Paul's doxology is placed in various different places in different manuscripts of Romans only strengthens the case for an early fourteen-chapter recension. While there is some uncertainty, Harry Gamble concludes that the canonical sixteen-chapter recension

2040-533: A way that suggests he was already familiar with them, whereas the material of chapters 1–15 presupposes that Paul has never met anyone from the Roman church. The fact that Papyrus 46 places Paul's doxology at the end of chapter 15 can also be interpreted as evidence for the existence of a fifteen-chapter recension of the epistle. Some manuscripts have a subscript at the end of the Epistle: For ten years before writing

2176-533: A wealth of scriptural data. Historical Reformed systems of thought treat classical covenant theology not merely as a point of doctrine or as a central dogma , but as the structure by which the biblical text organizes itself. The most well-known form of Covenant Theology is associated with Presbyterians and comes from the Westminster Confession of Faith . Another form is sometimes called Baptist Covenant Theology or 1689 Federalism, to distinguish it from

2312-523: Is a difference in emphasis. Biblical theology is not concerned to state the final doctrines which go to make up the content of Christian belief, but rather to describe the process by which revelation unfolds and moves toward the goal which is God's final revelation of his purposes in Jesus Christ. Biblical theology seeks to understand the relationships between the various eras in God's revealing activity recorded in

2448-439: Is a discipline of theology which emphasises the progressive nature of biblical revelation . Graeme Goldsworthy explains the relationship between biblical theology and systematic theology as follows: Biblical theology, as defined here, is dynamic not static. That is, it follows the movement and process of God's revelation in the Bible. It is closely related to systematic theology (the two are dependent upon one another), but there

2584-471: Is absolutely no justification for reading 2:1–5 as Paul's attack on 'the hypocrisy of the Jew.' No one in the first century would have identified ho alazon with Judaism. That popular interpretation depends upon anachronistically reading later Christian characterizations of Jews as 'hypocritical Pharisees ' ". (See also Anti-Judaism ). Paul says that a righteousness from God has made itself known apart from

2720-468: Is combined with the omission of chapters 15 and 16, there is no longer any clear reference to the Roman church throughout the entire epistle. Harry Gamble speculates that 1:7, 1:15, and chapters 15 and 16 may have been removed by a scribe in order to make the epistle more suitable for a "general" audience. It is quite possible that a fifteen-chapter form of Romans, omitting chapter 16, may have existed at an early date. Several scholars have argued, largely on

2856-493: Is considered by some, for example James Kallas , to be an interpolation . (See also the Great Commandment and Christianity and politics ). Paul Tillich accepts the historical authenticity of Romans 13:1–7, but claims it has been misinterpreted by churches with an anti-revolutionary bias: One of the many politico-theological abuses of biblical statements is the understanding of Paul's words [Romans 13:1–7] as justifying

SECTION 20

#1733085305553

2992-488: Is considered to be the visible New Testament sign of entrance into the Abrahamic Covenant and therefore may be administered individually to new believers making a public profession of faith . Paedobaptists further believe this extends corporately to the households of believers which typically would include children , or individually to children or infants of believing parents (see Infant baptism ). In this view, baptism

3128-399: Is dated AD late 55 to early 57. Ultimately consisting of 16 chapters, versions of the epistle with only the first 14 or 15 chapters circulated early. Some of these recensions lacked all reference to the original audience of Christians in Rome, making it very general in nature. Other textual variants include subscripts explicitly mentioning Corinth as the place of composition and name Phoebe ,

3264-537: Is debate among the reformed if the Mosaic covenant was in some way a republication of the covenant of works . The view that there was such a republication was advocated by Thomas Boston , Edward Fisher , Meredith Kline and John Owen . The covenant of grace promises eternal life for all people who have faith in Christ. God also promises the Holy Spirit to the elect to give them willingness and ability to believe. Christ

3400-459: Is impossible for her to keep the law in the sight of God. The introduction provides some general notes about Paul. He introduces his apostleship here and introductory notes about the gospel he wishes to preach to the church at Rome. Jesus' human line stems from David . Paul, however, does not limit his ministry to Jews. Paul's goal is that the Gentiles would also hear the gospel . He commends

3536-472: Is known of the circumstances of the church's founding, it was not founded by Paul: Many of the brethren went out to meet Paul on his approach to Rome. There is evidence that Christians were then in Rome in considerable numbers and probably had more than one place of meeting. The large number of names in Romans 16:3–15 of those then in Rome, and verses 5, 15 and 16, indicate there was more than one church assembly or company of believers in Rome. Verse 5 mentions

3672-430: Is likely the earlier version of the text. The Codex Boernerianus lacks the explicit references to the Roman church as the audience of the epistle found in Romans 1:7 and 1:15. There is evidence from patristic commentaries indicating that Boernerianus is not unique in this regard; many early, no longer extant manuscripts also lacked an explicit Roman addressee in chapter 1. It is notable that, when this textual variant

3808-573: Is most often used for the collection of books in the Bible, but can also refer to the New Covenant as a theological concept. The covenant of grace became the basis for all future covenants that God made with mankind such as with Noah ( Genesis 6, 9 ), with Abraham ( Genesis 12, 15, 17 ), with Moses ( Exodus 19–24 ), with David ( 2 Samuel 7 ), and finally in the New Covenant founded and fulfilled in Christ. These individual covenants are called

3944-453: Is not the precondition for life and relationship. Rather, life and relationship form the necessary environment for obligation." While this view still affirms the necessity of the merit of Christ, it departs from Kline's construal of merit as a fundamental principle of the covenant of works. Christianity • Protestantism Methodism maintains the superstructure of classical covenant theology, but being Arminian in soteriology , it discards

4080-462: Is of supreme importance for Wesley in facilitating an Arminian adaptation of covenant theology—first, by reconfiguring the reach of the covenant of grace; and second, by disallowing any notion that there is a reinvigoration of the covenant of works beyond the fall. Biblical theology Because scholars have tended to use the term in different ways, Biblical theology has been notoriously difficult to define. The academic field of biblical theology

4216-407: Is possible that the church suffered from internal strife between these two groups. Paul – a Hellenistic Jew and former Pharisee – shifts his argument to cater to both audiences and the church as a whole. Because the work contains material intended both for specific recipients as well as the general Christian public in Rome, scholars have had difficulty categorizing it as either a private letter or

Covenant theology - Misplaced Pages Continue

4352-475: Is prominent. Concerning this aspect of the Mosaic Covenant, Charles Hodge makes three points in his Commentary on Second Corinthians : (1) The Law of Moses was in first place a reenactment of the covenant of works; viewed this way, it is the ministration of condemnation and death. (2) It was also a national covenant, giving national blessings based on national obedience; in this way it was purely legal. (3) In

4488-568: Is speaking to the "Jew first." There is significance to this, but much of it is scholarly conjecture as the relationship between Paul and Judaism is still debated, and scholars are hard-pressed to find an answer to such a question without knowing more about the audience in question. Wayne Brindle argues, based on Paul's former writings against the Judaizers in Galatians and 2 Corinthians , that rumors had probably spread about Paul totally negating

4624-486: Is sub-divided into Old Testament theology and New Testament theology . Mark Bowald, writing for Grace Theological Seminary , stated that "four areas of focus" of theology "include biblical theology, historical theology , systematic (or dogmatic ) theology, and practical theology ". Biblical theology is the study of the Bible's teachings as organic developments through biblical history, as an unfolding and gradual revelation, with increasing clarity and definition in

4760-436: Is taught at schools such as Covenant Theological Seminary , Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary , Knox Theological Seminary , Reformed Theological Seminary , Westminster Theological Seminary , and Westminster Seminary California . There have been recent developments in classical covenant theology by Reformed (Calvinist) pastors and theologians. Wesleyan covenant theology, a variation of classical covenant theology,

4896-481: Is that Christ has performed the one act of righteousness and by His obedience of the one the many are made righteous (Rom 5:18, 19) .... Underlying Christ's mediatorship of a covenant of grace for the salvation of believers is His earthly fulfillment, through meritorious obedience, of His heavenly covenant of works with the Father. ... What begins as a rejection of works ends up as an attack, however unintentional, on

5032-517: Is that Paul wrote the Epistle to the Romans. C. E. B. Cranfield , in the introduction to his commentary on Romans, says: The denial of Paul's authorship of Romans by such critics [...] is now rightly relegated to a place among the curiosities of NT scholarship. Today no responsible criticism disputes its Pauline origin. The evidence of its use in the Apostolic Fathers is clear, and before the end of

5168-412: Is the substitutionary covenantal representative fulfilling the covenant of works on their behalf, in both the positive requirements of righteousness and its negative penal consequences (commonly described as His active and passive obedience). It is the historical expression of the eternal covenant of redemption. Genesis 3:15 , with the promise of a "seed" of the woman who would crush the serpent's head,

5304-501: Is the promise of the Lord , "I will be your God and you will be my people" ( cf . Exodus 6:7 , Leviticus 26:12 ), particularly displayed as His glory-presence comes to dwell in the midst of the people. This covenant is the one most in view when referring to the Old Covenant . Although it is a gracious covenant beginning with God's redemptive action ( cf . Exodus 20:1–2 ), a layer of law

5440-402: Is then on grace and faith . This has not been developed consistently between the various theologians. For example, Barth, influential in the mainline churches and in certain evangelical circles, conceived of grace as the fundamental reality underlying all of creation. Influential among more conservative Calvinist churches, Murray acknowledged the traditional concept of a works principle as

5576-533: Is thus seen as the functional replacement and sacramental equivalent of the Abrahamic rite of circumcision (Colossians 2:11–14) and symbolizes the internal cleansing from sin , among other things. Credobaptist Covenant theologians (such as the Baptists Benjamin Keach , John Gill , and Charles Spurgeon ) hold that baptism is only for those who can understand and profess their faith, and they argue that

Covenant theology - Misplaced Pages Continue

5712-575: Is usually identified as the historical inauguration for the covenant of grace. The covenant of grace runs through the Old and New Testaments, and is the same in substance under both the law and gospel, though there is some difference in the administration. Under the law, the sacrifices, prophesies, and other types and ordinances of the Jews signified Christ, and men were justified by their faith in Him just as they would be under

5848-585: The Acts of the Apostles 2:38–39 , the promise is seen to extend to the children of believers as it always was in the Abrahamic Covenant. The Biblical covenants between God and man include signs and seals that visibly represent the realities behind the covenants. These visible signs and symbols of God's covenant redemption are administered in a corporate manner (for instance, to households—see Acts 16:14–15 ; 16:31–34 ), not in an exclusively individualistic manner. Baptism

5984-642: The Christian addition which has become known as the New Testament (or Covenant). Detractors of covenant theology often refer to it as " supersessionism " or as "replacement theology", due to the perception that it teaches that God has abandoned the promises made to the Jews and has replaced the Jews with Christians as His chosen people on the Earth. Covenant theologians deny that God has abandoned His promises to Israel, but see

6120-468: The Jews made up a substantial number in Rome, and their synagogues , frequented by many, enabled the Gentiles to become acquainted with the story of Jesus of Nazareth . Consequently, churches composed of both Jews and Gentiles were formed at Rome. According to Irenaeus , a 2nd-century Church Father , the church at Rome was founded directly by the apostles Peter and Paul . However, many modern scholars disagree with Irenaeus, holding that while little

6256-519: The Old Testament (OT) or Hebrew Bible and falls in the field of Old Testament theology . The field started out as a Christian endeavor and aimed to provide an objective knowledge of early revelation, working as much as possible only with these biblical texts and their historical contexts, in the twentieth century it became informed by other voices and views, including those of feminist and Jewish scholars, which provided new insights and showed ways that

6392-459: The Real Presence of Christ mediated by the Holy Spirit (that is, real spiritual presence or pneumatic presence ). This differs from Roman Catholicism and Lutheranism which believe in the Real Presence as an actual bodily presence of Christ, as well as from the generally Baptist position that the supper is strictly a memorial commemoration. Paedobaptist Covenant theologians argue that

6528-552: The Second Helvetic Confession (1566). Some of Shepherd's critics contend that the concept of a works principle distinct from a Covenant of Grace is evident in the commentaries and dogmatic works of the earliest covenant theologians, particularly in the distinction made between Law and Gospel (for instance, Zacharias Ursinus , Commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism ). There is also explicit articulation of

6664-776: The United States , the Princeton theologians ( Charles Hodge , A. A. Hodge , B. B. Warfield , Geerhardus Vos , and J. Gresham Machen ) and, in the Netherlands , Herman Bavinck followed the main lines of the classic view, teaching the Covenant of Redemption, the Covenant of Works (Law), and the Covenant of Grace ( Gospel ). Recent well-known covenant theologians in the United States include Michael Horton , J. Ligon Duncan III , Meredith G. Kline , J. I. Packer , Richard L. Pratt Jr. , O. Palmer Robertson and R. C. Sproul . This system

6800-461: The Westminster Confession of Faith , that the Mosaic covenant was fundamentally an administration of the Covenant of Grace. A number of major 20th-century covenant theologians including Karl Barth , Klaas Schilder , and John Murray have departed from the traditional recognition of a covenant of works in classical covenant theology to develop a monocovenantal scheme subsuming everything under one Covenant of Grace. The focus of all biblical covenants

6936-514: The Wisdom of Solomon . This summary condemns "unnatural sexual behavior" and warns that such behavior has already resulted in a depraved body and mind ("reprobate mind" in the King James Version ) and says that people who do such things (including murder and wickedness ) are worthy of death. Paul stands firmly against the idol worship system which was common in Rome . Several scholars believe

SECTION 50

#1733085305553

7072-567: The biblical covenants because they are explicitly described in the Bible. Under the covenantal overview of the Bible, submission to God's rule and living in accordance with His moral law (expressed concisely in the Ten Commandments ) is a response to grace – never something which can earn God's acceptance ( legalism ). Even in His giving of the Ten Commandments, God introduces His law by reminding

7208-412: The history of God's dealings with mankind, from Creation to Fall to Redemption to Consummation , under the framework of three overarching theological covenants: those of redemption, of works, and of grace. Covenentalists call these three covenants "theological" because, though not explicitly presented as such in the Bible, they are thought of as theologically implicit , describing and summarizing

7344-538: The regulative principle of worship , which many paedobaptists also advocate and which states that elements of worship (including baptism) must be based on explicit commands of Scripture, is violated by infant baptism. Furthermore, because the New Covenant is described in Jeremiah 31:31–34 as a time when all who were members of it would have the law written on their hearts and would know God, Baptist Covenant Theologians believe only those who are born again are members of

7480-604: The tree of life , the tree of knowledge of good and evil , and the Sabbath are commonly considered to be the sacraments of the covenant of works. The Eucharist or the Lord's Supper was instituted by Jesus at a Passover meal, to which he gave a radical reinterpretation. The festival of Passover commemorates the Israelites' deliverance from Egypt – specifically, how the lamb's blood which God commanded them to place on their door posts caused

7616-413: The "commandment of life"; or Heidelberg Catechism, Question and Answer 6 affirming the goodness of man in creation. The later Westminster Confession of Faith (1646) explicitly names the Covenant of Works which Adam transgressed (7.2; 19.1), and which "continues to be a perfect rule of righteousness" in the form of the moral law (19.2, 3). In opposition to the modern revisers, Meredith Kline reemphasized

7752-639: The "covenant with the Levitical priests." Van Dorn argues that the covenant document for this covenant is the book of Leviticus itself. The Davidic covenant is found in 2 Samuel 7 . The Lord proclaims that He will build a house and lineage for David, establishing His kingdom and throne forever. This covenant is appealed to as God preserves David's descendants despite their wickedness ( cf . 1 Kings 11:26–39 , 15:1–8 ; 2 Kings 8:19 , 19:32–34 ), although it did not stop judgment from finally arriving (compare 2 Kings 21:7 , 23:26–27 ; Jeremiah 13:12–14 ). Among

7888-432: The "lifelong process" of their mind's renewal. To the extent they have been set free from sin by renewed minds (Romans 6:18), believers are no longer bound to sin. Believers are free to live in obedience to God and love everybody. As Paul says in Romans 13:10, "love ( ἀγάπη ) worketh no ill to his neighbor: therefore love is the fulfilling of law". The fragment in Romans 13:1–7 dealing with obedience to earthly powers

8024-412: The "predestinarian template of Reformed theology that was part and parcel of its historical development." The main difference between Wesleyan covenant theology and classical covenant theology is as follows: The point of divergence is Wesley’s conviction that not only is the inauguration of the covenant of grace coincidental with the fall, but so is the termination of the covenant of works. This conviction

8160-467: The 1640s. John Calvin writes of a probationary period for Adam, a promise of life for obedience, and the federal headship of Adam, but he does not write of a covenant of works. It is not referred to as a covenant in the opening chapters of Genesis , but is referred to as a covenant in Hosea 6:7, "But like Adam, they transgressed the covenant; there, they dealt faithlessly with Me." Covenant theology first sees

8296-572: The 1770s, Johann Salomo Semler argued that biblical theology needed to be separated from dogmatic theology. Johann Philipp Gabler 's 1787 lecture "On the Proper Distinction Between Biblical and Dogmatic Theology" is considered the beginning of modern biblical theology. Gabler believed the Bible was "the one clear source from which all true knowledge of the Christian religion is drawn". For Gabler, dogmatic theology must be based on

SECTION 60

#1733085305553

8432-458: The Abrahamic Covenant is still in force, and that God's covenantal promise "to be your God and the God of your descendants after you" still stands for every believer. The argument that the administration of all (other) Biblical covenants, including the New Covenant, include a principle of familial , corporate inclusion, or "generational succession" is therefore of secondary importance to whether infants should be baptized or not. The familial nature of

8568-443: The Abrahamic covenant is undisputed. Genesis 17 "You are to undergo circumcision, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and you. 12 For the generations to come every male among you who is eight days old must be circumcised, including those born in your household or bought with money from a foreigner—those who are not your offspring. 13 Whether born in your household or bought with your money, they must be circumcised." In

8704-573: The Angel of Death to "pass over" their dwellings, so that their firstborn might be spared from the final plague. The New Testament writers understand this event typologically : as the lamb's blood saved the Israelites from the plague, so Jesus' substitutionary death saves God's New Covenant people from being judged for their sins. Calvinism has generally viewed the Eucharist as a mysterious participation in

8840-494: The Bible controversially added the word "alone" ( allein in German) to Romans 3:28 so that it read: "thus, we hold, then, that man is justified without doing the works of the law, alone through faith". In the opinion of Jesuit biblical scholar Joseph Fitzmyer , the book "overwhelms the reader by the density and sublimity of the topic with which it deals, the gospel of the justification and salvation of Jew and Greek alike by

8976-627: The Bible. The systematic theologian is mainly interested in the finished article - the statement of Christian doctrine. The biblical theologian on the other hand is concerned rather with the progressive unfolding of truth. It is on the basis of biblical theology that the systematic theologian draws upon the pre-Pentecost texts of the Bible as part of the material from which Christian doctrine may be formulated. The work of Gregory Beale , Kevin Vanhoozer , Geerhardus Vos ( Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments ), Herman Nicolaas Ridderbos ( The Coming of

9112-592: The Covenant and Testament of God ( Summa doctrinae de foedere et testamento dei , 1648), Francis Turretin (1623–1687) in his Institutes of Elenctic Theology , and Hermann Witsius (1636–1708) in The Economy of the Covenants Between God and Man . It may also be seen in the writings of Jonathan Edwards (1703–58) in Collected Writings of Jonathan Edwards , Vol 2, Banner of Truth edition, p. 950. In

9248-721: The Covenant of Works between Adam and God in the Garden of Eden was not originally part of covenant theology, following John Murray's observation that a covenant of works at creation does not receive explicit mention in early confessions such as the French Confession (1559), the Scots Confession (1560), the Belgic Confession (1561), the Thirty-Nine Articles (1562), the Heidelberg Catechism (1563), and

9384-510: The Israelites that he is the one who brought them out of slavery in Egypt (grace). Moses Amyraut and few others proposed that the Mosaic Covenant is a third kind of substance, called the Subservient Covenant. As opposed to most covenant theologians, Moses Amyraut did not hold that the two substances are only the "Covenant of Grace" and the "Covenant of Works". The covenant of redemption is

9520-533: The Jewish existence in a Christian world (see also Antinomianism in the New Testament and Supersessionism ). Paul may have used the "Jew first" approach to counter such a view. Paul begins with a summary of Hellenistic Jewish apologist discourse. His summary begins by suggesting that humans have taken up ungodliness and wickedness for which there already is wrath from God . People have taken God's invisible image and made him into an idol . Paul draws heavily here from

9656-578: The Jews back into Rome, but then, after the Great Fire of Rome of 64, Christians were persecuted. Fitzmyer argues that with the return of the Jews to Rome in 54 new conflict arose between the Gentile Christians and the Jewish Christians who had formerly been expelled. He also argues that this may be what Paul is referring to when he talks about the "strong" and the "weak" in Romans 15; this theory

9792-609: The Kingdom ), Meredith Kline ( Kingdom Prologue ), Graeme Goldsworthy ( According to Plan , Gospel and Kingdom ), Vaughan Roberts ( God's Big Picture ), James Hamilton ( God's Glory in Salvation through Judgment ), and Peter Gentry and Stephen Wellum ( Kingdom through Covenant: A Biblical-Theological Understanding of the Covenants ) have helped popularize this approach to the Bible. Especially important for bringing this field of study into

9928-649: The Mosaic Covenant with the Hittite Suzerainty Treaty formula. A suggested comparison of the treaty structure with the book of Deuteronomy is as follows: Kline has argued that comparisons between the suzerain-vassal treaties and royal grants of the Ancient Near East provide insight in highlighting certain distinctive features of the Mosaic covenant as a law covenant, in contrast with the other historic post-Fall covenants. Many who have embraced Kline's insights have still insisted, however, in accordance with

10064-453: The New Covenant. Huldrych Zwingli and Johannes Oecolampadius were among the first reformers to speak of God's salvation economy under the categories of a covenant of works and a covenant of grace. John Calvin ( Institutes 2:9–11), like Heinrich Bullinger ( A Brief Exposition of the One and Eternal Testament or Covenant of God ), focused on the continuity of the covenant of grace, but taught

10200-488: The Pauline corpus. The breakdown of Romans as a treatise began with F.C. Baur in 1836 when he suggested "this letter had to be interpreted according to the historical circumstances in which Paul wrote it." Paul sometimes uses a style of writing common in his time called a diatribe . He appears to be responding to a critic (probably an imaginary one based on Paul's encounters with real objections in his previous preaching), and

10336-662: The Romans The Epistle to the Romans is the sixth book in the New Testament , and the longest of the thirteen Pauline epistles . Biblical scholars agree that it was composed by Paul the Apostle to explain that salvation is offered through the gospel of Jesus Christ . Romans was likely written while Paul was staying in the house of Gaius in Corinth . The epistle was probably transcribed by Paul's amanuensis Tertius and

10472-412: The Romans for faith . Paul also speaks of the past obstacles that have blocked his coming to Rome earlier. Paul announces that he is not "ashamed" ( epaiscúnomai ) of his gospel because it holds power ( dúnamis ). These two verses form a backdrop of themes for the rest of the book; first, that Paul is unashamed of his love for this gospel that he preaches about Jesus Christ. He also notes that he

10608-408: The Romans, in part, prepares them and gives reasons for his visit. In addition to Paul's geographic location, his religious views are important. First, Paul was a Hellenistic Jew with a Pharisaic background (see Gamaliel ), integral to his identity (see Paul the Apostle and Judaism ). His concern for his people is one part of the dialogue and runs throughout the letter. Second, the other side of

10744-450: The anti-revolutionary bias of some churches, particularly the Lutheran. But neither these words nor any other New Testament statement deals with the methods of gaining political power. In Romans, Paul is addressing eschatological enthusiasts, not a revolutionary political movement. The concluding verses contain a description of his travel plans, personal greetings and salutations. One-third of

10880-552: The apparent polarisation between Calvin and Olevianus on the one hand and Luther , Bullinger , and the Puritans on the other hand is a faulty reading of history. The Noahic covenant is found in Genesis 8:20–9:17 . Although redemption motifs are prominent as Noah and his family are delivered from the judgment waters, the narrative of the flood plays on the creation motifs of Genesis 1 as de-creation and re-creation. The formal terms of

11016-446: The basis of internal evidence, that Chapter 16 represents a separate letter of Paul – possibly addressed to Ephesus – that was later appended to Romans. There are a few different arguments for this conclusion. First of all, there is a concluding peace benediction at 15:33, which reads like the other Pauline benedictions that conclude their respective letters. Secondly, Paul greets a large number of people and families in chapter 16, in

11152-471: The biblical message of saving grace. Kline, Michael Horton , and others have sought to uphold the distinction of two sorts of covenant traditions: one based on merit, earned by obedience to law (works), and the other on promise (grace). While the consensus in Calvinist theology is that works are antithetical to grace as the means of justification , differences emerge in attempts to describe this antithesis. On

11288-420: The bondage of sin. Paul teaches that through faith , the faithful have been joined with Jesus and freed from sin. Believers should celebrate in the assurance of salvation and be certain that no external force or party can take their salvation away from them. This promise is open to everyone since everyone has sinned, save the one who paid for all of them. In Romans 7:1 , Paul says that humans are under

11424-438: The conditions under which Israel will be God's chosen nation again : when Israel returns to its faith, sets aside its unbelief. From chapter 12 through the first part of chapter 15, Paul outlines how the gospel transforms believers and the behaviour that results from such a transformation. This transformation is described as a "renewing of your mind" (12:2), a transformation that Douglas J. Moo characterizes as "the heart of

11560-608: The confessional tradition was Old Princeton theologian, Geerhardus Vos ( Biblical Theology: Old and New Testaments ). They summarize the message of the Bible as being about "God's people in God's place under God's rule and blessing" (in Graeme Goldsworthy, Gospel and Kingdom , Paternoster, 1981). In the 17th century, attempts to prove that Protestant dogmatic theology was based in the Bible were described as biblical theology . These early works explained biblical texts according to standard outlines used in systematic theology. In

11696-509: The connection as a covenant, wherein the terms of the relationship are set down by God alone according to God's own will. The covenant of works ( Latin : foedus operum , also called the covenant of life) was made in the Garden of Eden between God and Adam who represented all humankind as a federal head ( Romans 5:12–21 ). God offered Adam a perfect and perpetual life if he did not violate God's single commandment, but warned that death would follow if he disobeyed that commandment. Adam broke

11832-463: The covenant itself more reflect a reaffirmation of the universal created order, than a particular redemptive promise. The Abrahamic covenant is found in Genesis chapters 12, 15, and 17 . In contrast with the covenants made with Adam or Noah which were universal in scope, this covenant was with a particular people. Abraham is promised a seed and a land, although he would not see its fruition within his own lifetime. The Book of Hebrews explains that he

11968-700: The covenant of works and covenant of grace scheme along the lines of the law-gospel distinction. Classical statements of covenant theology can be found in the British Westminster Confession of Faith (particularly chap. 7, 8, 19), as well as in the writings of English theologians such as John Owen (1616–1683), Biblical Theology , and An Exposition of the Epistle to the Hebrews . The classical statements among 17th century continental theologians include Johannes Cocceius (c. 1603–1669) in The Doctrine of

12104-522: The covenant, thus standing condemned as representative for all humankind. The term foedus operum was first used by Dudley Fenner in 1585, though Zacharias Ursinus had mentioned a covenant of creation in 1562. The concept of the covenant of works became commonly recognized in Reformed theology by 1590, though not by all; some members of the Westminster Assembly disagreed with the teaching in

12240-504: The covenant. The covenant was therefore also bilateral or dipleuric ( Latin : foedus dipleuron ). Scholars have challenged the notion in contemporary scholarship that Genevan Reformers taught a unilateral and unconditional covenant relationship whilst the Rhineland Reformers taught a bilateral contractual relationship. Mark Jones, Richard Muller , J. Mark Beach, and John Von Rohr have argued that Leonard Trinterud's identification of

12376-557: The cup of the Passover meal is "the New Covenant in [His] blood." This use of the Old Testament typology is developed further in the Epistle to the Hebrews ( esp. chs. 7–10 ). Jesus is the last Adam and Israel's hope and consolation: he is the fulfillment of the law and the prophets ( Matthew 5:17–18 ). He is the prophet greater than Jonah (Matthew 12:41 ), and the Son over the house where Moses

12512-419: The death of Jesus ), because they theologically rationalized that Jews were no longer God's people. Scholars often have difficulty assessing whether Romans is a letter or an epistle , a relevant distinction in form-critical analysis: A letter is something non-literary, a means of communication between persons who are separated from each other. Confidential and personal in nature, it is intended only for

12648-535: The dialogue is Paul's conversion and calling to follow Christ in the early 30s. The most probable ancient account of the beginning of Christianity in Rome is given by a 4th-century writer known as Ambrosiaster : It is established that there were Jews living in Rome in the times of the Apostles , and that those Jews who had believed [in Christ] passed on to the Romans the tradition that they ought to profess Christ but keep

12784-496: The early work was bound by the perspectives of their authors. Key scholars have included Walther Eichrodt , Gerhard von Rad , Phyllis Trible , Geerhardus Vos , and Jon Levenson . Others focus on the New Testament (NT); the field of New Testament theology likewise seeks understanding from within the bounds of these documents and their historical contexts. Key scholars have included Rudolf Bultmann , Hendrikus Boers , and N. T. Wright . In Evangelicalism , biblical theology

12920-563: The eternal agreement within the Godhead in which the Father appointed the Son through the Spirit to become incarnate , suffer , and die as a federal head of mankind to make an atonement for their sin. In return, the Father promised to raise Christ from the dead , glorify Him, and give Him a people. Two of the earliest theologians to write about the covenant of redemption were Johannes Cocceius and John Owen , though Caspar Olevian had hinted at

13056-508: The fulfillment of the promises to Israel in the person and the work of the Messiah , Jesus of Nazareth , who established the church in organic continuity with Israel , not as a separate replacement entity. Many covenant theologians have also seen a distinct future promise of gracious restoration for unregenerate Israel . God's covenantal relationship with God's creation is not made automatically or out of necessity. Rather, God chooses to establish

13192-475: The gospel. These were done away with the coming of Christ, and replaced with the much simpler sacraments of baptism and the Lord's Supper. Reformed orthodox theologians taught that the covenant was primarily unilateral or monopleuric ( Latin : foedus monopleuron ) on the part of God, but also entailed conditions on the part of men. The conditions of the covenant of grace were spoken of as assumptive and confirmatory rather than duties required in order to receive

13328-420: The grace of God through faith in Jesus Christ, revealing the uprightness and love of God the Father ." Anglican bishop N. T. Wright notes that Romans is: ...neither a systematic theology nor a summary of Paul's lifework, but it is by common consent his masterpiece. It dwarfs most of his other writings, an Alpine peak towering over hills and villages. Not all onlookers have viewed it in the same light or from

13464-519: The house of Gaius , and transcribed by Tertius , his amanuensis . There are a number of reasons why Corinth is considered most plausible. Paul was about to travel to Jerusalem on writing the letter, which matches Acts where it is reported that Paul stayed for three months in Greece . This probably implies Corinth as it was the location of Paul's greatest missionary success in Greece. Additionally, Phoebe

13600-515: The idea before them. This covenant is not mentioned in the Westminster Standards , but the idea of a contractual relationship between the Father and Son is present. Scriptural support for such a covenant may be found in Psalms 2 and 110, Isaiah 53, Philippians 2:5–11 and Revelation 5:9–10 . Some covenant theologians have denied the intra-Trinitarian covenant of redemption, or have questioned

13736-566: The idea of a covenant of works as expressed in the Westminster Confession of Faith 7.2 as a means to protect a gospel of grace. Kline wrote: If meritorious works could not be predicated of Jesus Christ as second Adam, then obviously there would be no meritorious achievement to be imputed to His people as the ground of their justification-approbation. The gospel invitation would turn out to be a mirage. We who have believed on Christ would still be under condemnation. The gospel truth, however,

13872-508: The latter books, and embryonic and inchoate in form in the earlier books of the Bible. Although most speak of biblical theology as a particular method or emphasis within biblical studies , some scholars have also used the term in reference to its distinctive content. In this understanding, biblical theology is limited to a collation and restatement of biblical data, without the logical analysis and dialectical correlation between texts that systematic theology emphasizes. Some scholars focus on

14008-473: The law [Torah] [...] One ought not to condemn the Romans, but to praise their faith, because without seeing any signs or miracles and without seeing any of the apostles, they nevertheless accepted faith in Christ, although according to a Jewish rite . From Adam Clarke: The occasion of writing the epistle: [...] Paul had made acquaintance with all circumstances of the Christians at Rome [...] and finding that it

14144-505: The law while they live: "Know ye not [...] that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?" However, Jesus' death on the cross makes believers dead to the law ( 7:4 , "Wherefore, my brethren, ye are also become dead to the law by the body of Christ "), according to an antinomistic interpretation . In chapters 9–11 Paul addresses the faithfulness of God to the Israelites , where he says that God has been faithful to his promise. Paul hopes that all Israelites will come to realize

14280-490: The law, to which the law and prophets testify, and this righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus to all who believe. He describes justification – legally clearing the believer of the guilt and penalty of sin – as a gift of God, and not the work of man (lest he might boast), but by faith. In chapters five through eight, Paul argues that believers can be assured of their hope in salvation , having been freed from

14416-484: The letter ( c.  47–57 AD), Paul had traveled around the territories bordering the Aegean Sea evangelizing. Churches had been planted in the Roman provinces of Galatia , Macedonia , Achaia and Asia . Paul, considering his task complete, wanted to preach the gospel in Spain , where he would not "build upon another man's foundation". This allowed him to visit Rome on the way, a long-time ambition of his. The letter to

14552-471: The letter is structured as a series of arguments. In the flow of the letter, Paul shifts his arguments, sometimes addressing the Jewish members of the church, sometimes the Gentile membership and sometimes the church as a whole. To review the current scholarly viewpoints on the purpose of Romans, along with a bibliography, see Dictionary of Paul and His Letters . For a 16th-century " Lollard " reformer view, see

14688-567: The matter." It is a transformation so radical that it amounts to "a transfiguration of your brain," a " metanoia ", a "mental revolution." Paul goes on to describe how believers should live. Christians are no longer under the law, that is, no longer bound by the law of Moses, but under the grace of God (see Law and grace ). Christians do not need to live under the law because to the extent that their minds have been renewed, they will know "almost instinctively" what God wants of them. The law then provides an "objective standard" for judging progress in

14824-460: The notion of the Son's works leading to the reward of gaining a people for God, or have challenged the covenantal nature of this arrangement. In Reformed theology, a sacrament is usually defined as a sign and seal of the covenant of grace. Since covenant theology today is mainly Reformed in its outlook, proponents view Baptism and the Lord's Supper as the only two sacraments in this sense, which are sometimes called "church ordinances." Along with

14960-521: The one hand, Calvinist theologians were more in line with Kline tend to say that works are ultimately the basis for grace, since God requires perfect upholding of the law for heavenly reward. Since this is understood to be an impossible task for the corrupted sinner , it is Christ who perfectly obeyed the law in fulfillment of the covenant of works. Jesus , earning the reward, graciously bestows it to His people ( cf. Luke 22:29 ). For example, R. C. Sproul writes, "Man's relationship to God in creation

15096-481: The other hand, Calvinist theologians more in line with Murray tend to say that works were never meant to be the basis for grace, but that grace precedes the call for obedience. Consequently, works are the necessary response to grace and not the precondition for it. For example, Michael Williams writes, "The function of law within Scripture is the maintenance of relationship, not the creation of relationship. Legal obligation

15232-456: The passage is a non-Pauline interpolation . On the traditional Protestant interpretation, Paul here calls out Jews who are condemning others for not following the law when they themselves are also not following the law. Stanley Stowers, however, has argued on rhetorical grounds that Paul is in these verses not addressing a Jew at all but rather an easily recognizable caricature of the typical boastful person ( ὁ ἀλαζων ). Stowers writes, "There

15368-512: The person or persons to whom it is addressed, and not at all for the public or any kind of publicity...An Epistle is an artistic literary form, just like the dialogue, the oration, or the drama. It has nothing in common with the letter except its form: apart from that one might venture the paradox that the epistle is the opposite of a real letter. The contents of the epistle are intended for publicity—they aim at interesting "the public." Joseph Fitzmyer argues, from evidence put forth by Stirewalt, that

15504-409: The polarization of liberal theology and Christian fundamentalism . Important themes included: "1) The Bible as a theological resource; 2) The unity of the Bible; 3) The revelation of God in history ; 4) The Bible’s distinctly Hebraic mentality; and 5) The uniqueness of biblical revelation." Scholars included G. Ernest Wright , Floyd V. Filson, Otto Piper and James D. Smart. Epistle to

15640-400: The preached word, they are identified as an ordinary means of grace for salvation. The benefits of these rites do not occur from participating in the rite itself ( ex opere operato ), but through the power of the Holy Spirit as they are received by faith. Sometimes Reformed covenantal theologians define sacrament to include signs and seals of the covenant of works. The Garden of Eden ,

15776-483: The prophets of the exile , there is hope of restoration under a Davidic king who will bring peace and justice ( cf . Book of Ezekiel 37:24–28 ). The New Covenant is anticipated with the hopes of the Davidic messiah , and most explicitly predicted by the prophet Jeremiah ( Jeremiah 31:31 – 33 ). At the Last Supper , Jesus alludes to this prophecy, as well as to prophecies such as Isaiah 49:8 , when he says that

15912-471: The relationship between the Old Covenant (with national Israel) and the New Covenant (with the house of Israel [ Jeremiah 31:31 ] in Christ's blood ). That such a framework exists appears at least feasible, since from New Testament times the Bible of Israel has been known as the Old Testament (i.e., Covenant; see 2 Corinthians 3:14 [NRSV], "they [Jews] hear the reading of the old covenant "), in contrast to

16048-708: The sacrificial system, it points to the Gospel of salvation through a mediator. Some commentators, like John Gill , see in the passage that begins in Deuteronomy 29:1 a distinct and gracious covenant, involving circumcision of the heart, which foresees the embrace of the Gentiles and which is looked back upon as distinct from the Mosaic Covenant by the Apostle Paul in Romans 10:6–8 . Other commentators, such as Douglas Van Dorn, recognize

16184-427: The same angle, and their snapshots and paintings of it are sometimes remarkably unalike. Not all climbers have taken the same route up its sheer sides, and there is frequent disagreement on the best approach. What nobody doubts is that we are here dealing with a work of massive substance, presenting a formidable intellectual challenge while offering a breathtaking theological and spiritual vision. The scholarly consensus

16320-409: The second century it is listed and cited as Paul's. Every extant early list of NT books includes it among his letters. The external evidence of authenticity could indeed hardly be stronger; and it is altogether borne out by the internal evidence, linguistic, stylistic, literary, historical and theological. The letter was most probably written while Paul was in Corinth , probably while he was staying in

16456-527: The standard covenant theology of Presbyterian Westminster Federalism. It is associated with Reformed Baptists and comes from the Second London Baptist Confession of Faith of 1689. Methodist hermeneutics traditionally use a variation of this, known as Wesleyan covenant theology, which is consistent with Arminian soteriology. As a framework for Biblical interpretation, covenant theology stands in contrast to dispensationalism in regard to

16592-517: The style of Romans is an "essay-letter." Philip Melanchthon , a writer during the Reformation , suggested that Romans was caput et summa universae doctrinae christianae ("a summary of all Christian doctrine"). While some scholars suggest, like Melanchthon, that it is a type of theological treatise, this view largely ignores chapters 14 and 15 of Romans. There are also many "noteworthy elements" missing from Romans that are included in other areas of

16728-761: The substance of what became classic covenant theology in terms of Law and Gospel. Early post-reformation writings, including Zacharius Ursinus (1534–1583) in Commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism (published posthumously, 1591), Caspar Olevianus (1536–1587) in Concerning the Substance of the Covenant of Grace between God and the Elect ( De substantia foederis gratuiti inter deum et electos , 1585), and Scottish Theologian Robert Rollock (1555–1599) in A Treatise of our Effectual Calling ( Tractatus de vocatione efficaci , 1597), developed

16864-443: The truth, stating that "Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called." Paul affirms that he himself is also an Israelite, and had in the past been a persecutor of Early Christians . In Romans 9–11 Paul talks about how the nation of Israel has not been cast away, and

17000-520: The twenty-one Christians identified in the greetings are women . Additionally, none of these Christians answer to the name Peter , although according to the Catholic tradition , he had been Pope in Rome for about 25 years. Possibly related was the Incident at Antioch between Paul and Cephas. Roman Catholics accept the necessity of faith for salvation but point to Romans 2:5–11 for the necessity of living

17136-425: The work of William Tyndale . In his prologue to his translation of Romans, which was largely taken from the prologue of German Reformer Martin Luther , Tyndale writes that: .. this epistle is the principal and most excellent part of the new testament, and most pure evangelion, that is to say glad tidings and what we call the gospel, and also a light and a way in unto the whole scripture ... The sum and whole cause of

17272-492: The writings of this epistle, is, to prove that a man is justified by faith only: which proposition whoso denieth, to him is not only this epistle and all that Paul writeth, but also the whole scripture, so locked up that he shall never understand it to his soul's health. And to bring a man to the understanding and feeling that faith only justifieth, Paul proveth that the whole nature of man is so poisoned and so corrupt, yea and so dead concerning godly living or godly thinking, that it

17408-447: Was [...] partly of heathens converted to Christianity, and partly of Jews , who had, with many remaining prejudices , believed in Jesus as the true Messiah, and that many contentions arose from the claims of the Gentiles to equal privileges with the Jews, and from absolute refusal of the Jews to admit these claims, unless the Gentile converts become circumcised ; he wrote this epistle to adjust and settle these differences. At this time,

17544-490: Was a deacon of the church in Cenchreae , a port to the east of Corinth, and would have been able to convey the letter to Rome after passing through Corinth and taking a ship from Corinth's west port. Erastus , mentioned in Romans 16:23, also lived in Corinth, being the city's commissioner for public works and city treasurer at various times, again indicating that the letter was written in Corinth. The precise time at which it

17680-516: Was a servant (Hebrews 3:5–6 ), leading His people to the heavenly promised land. He is the high priest greater than Aaron , offering up Himself as the perfect sacrifice once for all (Hebrews 9:12 , 26 ). He is the king greater than Solomon (Matthew 12:42 ), ruling forever on David's throne ( Luke 1:32 ). The term " New Testament " comes from the Latin translation of the Greek New Covenant and

17816-405: Was based on works . What Adam failed to achieve, Christ, the second Adam, succeeded in achieving. Ultimately the only way one can be justified is by works ." The sinner is thus saved by Christ's works and not his own. Right standing before God is then due to an alien or imputed righteousness received by faith, not by personal faithfulness which is the fruition of salvation and not its ground. On

17952-470: Was designed by John Wesley , the founder of Methodism . Meredith G. Kline did pioneering work in the field of Biblical studies , in the 1960s and 1970s, building on prior work by George E. Mendenhall , by identifying the form of the covenant with the common Suzerain – Vassal treaties of the Ancient Near East in the 2nd millennium BC. One of the highlights of his work has been the comparison of

18088-413: Was forgotten. According to biblical scholar Frank Matera, "Instead of becoming a servant of dogmatic theology, biblical theology soon became its rival." The biblical theology movement was an approach to Protestant biblical studies that was popular in the United States, particularly among Presbyterians , between the 1940s and early 1960s. Heavily influenced by Neo-orthodoxy , the movement sought to escape

18224-456: Was looking to a better and heavenly land, a city with foundations, whose builder and architect is God ( 11:8–16 ). The Apostle Paul writes that the promised seed refers in particular to Christ ( Galatians 3:16 ). The Abrahamic covenant is: The Mosaic covenant, found in Exodus 19–24 and the book of Deuteronomy , expands on the Abrahamic promise of a people and a land. Repeatedly mentioned

18360-572: Was originally put forth by W. Marxsen in Introduction to the New Testament: An Approach to its problems (1968) but is critiqued and modified by Fitzmyer. Fitzmyer's main contention is that Paul seems to be purposefully vague. Paul could have been more specific if he wanted to address this problem specifically. Keck thinks Gentile Christians may have developed a dislike of or looked down on Jews (see also Antisemitism and Responsibility for

18496-534: Was written is not mentioned in the epistle, but it was obviously written when the collection for Jerusalem had been assembled and Paul was about to "go unto Jerusalem to minister unto the saints", that is, at the close of his second visit to Greece, during the winter preceding his last visit to that city. The majority of scholars writing on Romans propose the letter was written in late 55/early 56 or late 56/early 57. Early 55 and early 58 both have some support, while German New Testament scholar Gerd Lüdemann argues for

#552447