Counterproductive norms are group norms that prevent a group , organization , or other collective entities from performing or accomplishing its originally stated function by working oppositely to how they were initially intended. Group norms are typically enforced to facilitate group survival, to make group member behaviour predictable, to help avoid embarrassing interpersonal interactions, or to clarify distinctive aspects of the group’s identity. Counterproductive norms exist despite the fact that they cause opposite outcomes of the intended prosocial functions.
45-425: Counterproductive is anything that is more of an "obstacle" than a help in the achieving of a productive project or an objective. Counterproductive norms : A situation that prevents a group, organization, or other collective entities from performing or accomplishing its originally stated function. Counterproductive work behavior : Employee behavior that goes against
90-966: A Factory . The book was a published report of "a case study of developments in the social life of one industrial community between April, 1948 and November 1950". The case involved a publicly-held British company engaged principally in the manufacture, sale, and servicing of metal bearings. The study concerned itself with the description, analysis, and development of corporate group behaviors . Researchers have proposed myriad dimensions individually and in combination as useful for analyzing organizational culture. Examples include external/internal, strong/weak, flexible/rigid, and many others. Culture can be externally focused, aiming to satisfy customers, investors, and partners. Alternatively, they can be internally focused, aiming to satisfy employees, comply with union-imposed rules, or to meet conduct standards around issues such as diversity, equity, and inclusion . Many organizations lie between such extremes, attempting to balance
135-565: A caution that may be redundant "because that's the way it's always been around here". Kotter and Heskett define an adaptive culture as characterized by managers who pay close attention to their constituencies, especially customers, initiating change when needed, and taking risks. They claim that organizations with adaptive cultures perform better. Bullying manifests in workplaces that allow employees of higher status to harass those of lower status. This generally requires support or at least forbearance from company leaders. Bullying can cascade down
180-471: A corporate culture requires effort, typically from leaders, but potentially throughout the organization. Among the many types of communication that affect organizational culture are: Numerous outcomes have been associated either directly or indirectly with organizational culture. The relationships between organizational culture and various outcomes include organizational performance, employee commitment, and innovation. A healthy and robust organizational culture
225-463: A counterproductive norm. Organizational culture Organizational culture refers to culture related to organizations including schools, universities, not-for-profit groups, government agencies, and business entities. Alternative terms include business culture , corporate culture and company culture. The term corporate culture emerged in the late 1980s and early 1990s. It was used by managers , sociologists , and organizational theorists in
270-451: A cultural belief system with behaviour patterns that are relevant and informative, in the form of customs and traditions fulfill overarching needs based on the local social culture and physical environment. Much research has been done regarding counterproductive work behaviours. These behaviours include things such as theft, sabotage, workplace violence and aggression, incivility, revenge and service sabotage that are willfully committed with
315-508: A cultural change, a needs assessment can characterize the existing culture. This involves some mixture of employ surveys, interviews, focus groups, observation, customer surveys, and other internal research. The company must then describe the new, desired culture, and then design a change process. Cummings and Worley offer six guidelines for cultural change, in line with the eight distinct stages mentioned by Kotter. Several methods have been used to classify organizational culture. While there
360-479: A friendly climate conducive to conflict avoidance. Since the late 1960s, the so-called 'Five Monkeys Experiment' that serves to exemplify the adverse effects of unquestioned traditions has become part of management lore, often titled "How Company Policy Is Made". It imagines a situation where five monkeys are in a cage with a banana tied to the ceiling. Whenever a monkey climbs to reach the banana, all five are sprayed with cold water. The group quickly learn to ignore
405-484: A group’s history that established a precedent, as a result of primacy (the first emergent behaviour that sets group expectations), or from carry-over behaviours from past situations. Groups establish these norms based on specific group values and goals and may establish sanctions in response to deviation from these norms. Such sanctions are typically applied in the form of social exclusion or disapproval. Counterproductive norms also typically consist of these attributes but
450-415: A normal behavior in a given context. They are often referred to as the “is" norms, because they depict things as they actually are. Injunctive norms describe whether a given action is considered acceptable. They are called the “ought" norms" because they constitute what should be. The descriptive norm is very powerful. The way that communications are phrased actually has a big impact on the effectiveness of
495-429: A norm’s power depends on the value it represents to the culture. Social norms evolve out of behaviours that repeatedly occur and are reinforced. Thus, the strength of norms and counterproductive norms depend on various group dynamics. Because they evolve out of social interaction, one factor of norm strength is the available opportunities for group members to communicate. The strongest norms are those that are important to
SECTION 10
#1732873432301540-427: A positive impact on cultural adherence. Chambers claimed that this was a short-term response rather than a culture change. Deloitte argued that employees displayed greater sense of purpose, inspiration, and contribution. Also, leaders became more tolerant of employees' failure because of a significant increase in experimentation and risk-taking. Daum and Maraist claimed that sense of purpose relates to customers and
585-489: A term Hofstede used for predictable behavior. Hofstede related culture to ethnic and regional differences, but also to the influence of organizations, professional, family, social and subcultural groups, national political systems, and legislation. He suggested that changing "mental programs" involves changing behavior first, which then leads to value change. Though groups such as Jews and Gypsies have maintained their identity through centuries, their values reflect adaptation to
630-457: Is a state in which even if group members have different ideas, they do not challenge the group. Groupthink can lead to lack of creativity and decisions made without critical evaluation. Hogg and separately Deanne et al. stated that groupthink can occur, for example, when group members rely heavily on a charismatic figure or where members evince an "evangelical" belief in the organization's values. Groupthink can also occur in groups characterized by
675-449: Is composed of the concepts of distributive justice , which refers to equitable allocation of resources, and procedural justice , which refers to how these decisions are made and their perceived fairness. Feelings of injustice and frustration have been linked to various counterproductive behaviors such as sabotage, time-wasting, interpersonal aggression, job apathy, and other anti-social behaviors. One example of counterproductive norms are
720-670: Is different from Wikidata All article disambiguation pages All disambiguation pages Counterproductive norms Group norms are informal rules and standards that guide and regulate the behaviour of a group’s members. These norms may be implicit or explicit and are intended to provide information on appropriate behaviour for group members in particular social situations. Thus, counterproductive norms instead illicit inappropriate behaviour from group members. Group norms are not predetermined but rather arise out of social interactions. These norms can have powerful influence over group behaviour. Norms may arise due to critical events in
765-561: Is no single "type" of organizational culture and organizational cultures vary widely across organizations, researchers have developed models to describe different indicators of organizational cultures. Hofstede looked for differences between over 160 000 IBM employees in 50 countries and three regions of the world, searching for aspects of culture that influence business behavior. He emphasized awareness of international differences and multiculturalism. Cultural differences reflect differences in thinking and social action, and in "mental programs",
810-874: Is thought to offer various benefits, including: A Harvard Business School study reported that culture has a significant effect on an organization's long-term economic performance. The study examined the management practices at 160 organizations over ten years and found that culture can impact performance. Performance-oriented cultures experienced better financial results. Additionally, a 2002 Corporate Leadership Council study found that cultural traits such as risk taking, internal communications, and flexibility are important drivers of performance. Furthermore, innovativeness, productivity through people, and other cultural factors cited by Peters and Waterman in In Search of Excellence also have positive economic consequences. Denison, Haaland, and Goelzer reported that culture contributes to
855-631: The Iron Eyes Cody Keep America Beautiful public service announcements. Cialdini (2003) argues that while the ad makers convey an injunctive norm about environmentalism, they contrasted this by portraying littering as a descriptive norm. While they did have a lot of success and have been recognized as some of the best PSAs of all time, Cialdini argues that they could have been more effective, had they conveyed different descriptive norms. A study by Cialdini and colleagues tested whether signs conveying different norms had an effect on
900-443: The 1980s. Organizational culture influences the ways in which people interact , how decisions are made (or not made), the context within which knowledge is created, the resistance they will have towards certain changes, and ultimately the way they share (or the way they do not share) knowledge. Various definitions exist, without consensus. Examples include: Jaques introduced the concept in his 1951 book The Changing Culture of
945-408: The banana and punish any monkey who attempts to reach for it. If one monkey is removed from the cage and replaced with a newcomer, they too are punished for reaching for the banana. If every monkey is subsequently replaced in this manner, so that none present remember being sprayed with cold water, the group will supposedly continue to punish any attempts to reach the banana. The monkeys are perpetuating
SECTION 20
#1732873432301990-442: The behavior of people within an organization and the meaning placed on these behaviors. An increased perception of the level of organizational acceptance for sexual harassment being correlated to actual reports of unwanted sexual coercion is an example of organizational culture influence on counterproductive workplace behavior. Control systems are physical or procedural entities that aim to reduce counterproductive behaviors or increase
1035-542: The descriptive norm, they are looking to the behaviors of others to try and figure out the most effective course of action. This might be a cognitive “short-cut" to determining most effective action, as the functional perspective of normative production might suggest. Counterproductive norms can be created by looking to the behavior of others. Both descriptive norms and injunctive norms are used in normative communications. If used incorrectly, they can create counter productive norms. Descriptive norms describe what constitutes
1080-571: The dimensions of external/internal focus and flexible/stable evolution. Deal and Kennedy characterized four types of organizations. Each focused on how quickly the organization processes along three dimensions: Schein claimed that culture is the most difficult organizational attribute to change, outlasting products, services, founders and leadership and all physical attributes. His model considers culture as an observer , characterized in terms of artifacts, values and underlying assumptions. Schein's model considers attributes that can be experienced by
1125-490: The dominant cultural environment. Hofstede described national and regional cultural groupings that affect the behavior of organizations and identified four dimensions of culture (later five ) in his study of national cultures: These dimensions help define the effect of national cultures on management, and can be used to adapt to local needs. Denison's model assessed culture along four dimensions. Each divides into three sub-dimensions: It separately assesses cultures along
1170-485: The goals of an organization. Topics referred to by the same term [REDACTED] This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the title Counterproductive . If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article. Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Counterproductive&oldid=1253941143 " Category : Disambiguation pages Hidden categories: Short description
1215-416: The group. Counterproductive norms are perpetuated by the same mechanisms but differ from group norms in terms of their outcomes. Two different perspectives give explanations for the formation and existence of group norms and counterproductive group norms. The Societal-Value Perspective suggests that norms are arbitrary rules that exist as a result of cultural value or reinforcement. This theory states that
1260-509: The group. As well, strength depends on the cohesiveness and unity of the group. The Functional Perspective suggests that norms exist to enhance survival potential by curtailing dysfunctional behaviours while encouraging socially proactive ones. Unlike the Societal-Value perspective, the Functional perspective states that norms are not arbitrary. Instead, they are meant to balance the needs of
1305-448: The indirect effects that strengthened or weakened cultures as organizations reacted in various ways to the pandemic. Some members felt disengaged and expandable rather than essential, alienated, and exhausted. Sull and Sull reported that employees rated their leadership higher given honest/open communication, integrity, and transparency more than in preceding years. Also, employers and leaders giving more attention to employees' welfare had
1350-469: The individual with the goals of the group of social control and harmony. Thus, norms exist to serve a purpose of survival. However, counterproductive norms work in opposition to socially proactive functions and therefore, cannot be adequately explained by this theory. Both the societal-value perspective and the functional perspective theories can be integrated to describe the fact that individuals experience pressure to communicate effectively with others within
1395-407: The intention behind their activation is usually not prosocial and is instead opposite to their original function. Counterproductive norms manifest in part because of the principle of social proof . Social proof is what happens when we learn what is correct by referring to the views of others. This is especially true in unclear or ambiguous situations. When people infer the appropriate behavior from
Counterproductive - Misplaced Pages Continue
1440-594: The intention of harming an organization or its members. Some research suggests that these counterproductive behaviours are enacted when individuals or groups feel maltreated or as if they do not have legitimate options to protest. Possible antecedents of counterproductive norms include personality variables, organizational culture , control systems and injustice . Personality variables refer to individual attributes such as integrity. In fact, results on integrity tests have been shown to be correlated to counterproductive work behaviors. Organizational culture includes both
1485-459: The message. If that phrasing is used incorrectly, it follows that a counterproductive norm can develop. Norms may only exist in the context of a group. In other words, social norms do not exist with an independent individual. Norms may be transmitted deliberately by group members instructing others members on acceptable behaviour. They may also be transmitted passively through observation of others and their behaviours which are deemed acceptable by
1530-1003: The need of the individual or the group was foremost. He used behaviors such as mask-wearing to measure collectivism vs individualism. Cultures otherwise rated "strong" were relatively resistant to change during the pandemic. However, strong cultures that emphasized innovation were more willing to change. Mandated interventions could be seen by members either as attempts to protect them or to as attempts to exert control despite limited effectiveness, depending on how they were presented. Digital tools such as videoconferencing , screen-sharing, file sharing , shared document authoring, digital whiteboards , and chat groups became widely accepted, replacing in-person meetings. The reduced amount of face-to-face communications may have impacted organizational cultures. New members, lacking face time with others, experienced difficulty in adapting to their organization's culture. The loss of face-time affected existing employees as well, directly weakening cultures, in addition to
1575-448: The needs of multiple stakeholders. Any type of culture can be strongly or only tacitly supported. A strong culture is characterized by reinforcing tools such as ceremonies and policies to instill and spread it. The intent is to secure group compliance. Researchers generally report that organizations having strong cultures are more successful. Organizational culture is used to control, coordinate, and integrate distinct groups across
1620-425: The organization, reset objectives, rescale the organization, or achieve specific results. Organizational cultures have been reported to change in stages. One group proposed five stages: Existing culture can hinder change efforts, especially where members understand the roles that they are supposed to play. Marquis et al. claimed that 70% of all change efforts fail because of the members. Organizational culture, and
1665-422: The organization. Differences in national cultures must be addressed. Such differences include organizational structure and manager/employee relationships. Janis defined groupthink as "a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action." This
1710-702: The organizational hierarchy as supervisors experiencing bullying display the same behavior to their subordinates. The pandemic led many organizations to incorporate limiting spread into their cultures as a collective responsibility. Responses focused on requiring vaccines, hygiene, and masking. In Asia, mask-wearing was part of several national cultures predating the pandemic. This was driven by experience with prior flus in Asia, such as Spanish flu , Hong Kong flu , Avian flu , and Swine flu , in addition to SARS , as well as various affronts to air quality such as volcanic eruptions . Somers categorized cultures based on whether
1755-459: The penalties for engaging in these behaviors in the workplace. Sophisticated security systems are typically put in place with the intention of preventing counterproductive workplace behaviors but may be used in some situations as a means of committing sabotage (e.g. by falsifying records). Injustice in the work environment consists of perceived inequity as well as various other ideas within the concept of organizational justice . Organizational justice
1800-459: The rate of theft of petrified wood in a national forest. They used one sign with a descriptive norm and one with an injunctive norm. The descriptive norm “normalized" the behavior of theft, and as a result, raised the amount of theft. The injunctive norm was more effective at reducing theft, and lowered it from the baseline. The study gives us some empirical evidence that when messaging uses normative influence incorrectly, it can create or maintain
1845-484: The society of which employees are part. They compared hospitals and retail shops. The former had a greater sense of purpose during the pandemic, while the latter had less. Healthy cultures address members' concerns about the well-being of the organization. Whistleblowing , particularly when it damages a company's reputation, is considered to be a sign of a dysfunctional corporate culture, indicating that internal methods of addressing problems are inadequate. Promulgating
Counterproductive - Misplaced Pages Continue
1890-496: The structures in which they are embedded, often exhibit substantial inertia. Change methodologies include Peter Senge 's concept of a "learning organization" expressed in The Fifth Discipline or Directive Communication's "corporate culture evolution". Changing culture takes time. Members need time to get used to the new ways. Organizations with a strong and specific culture are harder to change. Prior to introducing
1935-402: The success of the organization, but not all dimensions contribute equally. Effects differed across nations, implying that organizational culture is rooted in national culture. Cultures are not static and can evolve over time, either organically or through intentional change efforts by management. Culture change may be attempted to reduce member turnover, influence behavior, make improvements to
1980-426: The two main reasons why cultures develop in organizations are external adaptation and internal integration. External adaptation helps an organization to flourish by affecting its culture. An appropriate culture holds the potential for generating sustained competitive advantage over external competitors. Internal integration is an important function for establishing essential social structures and aiding socialization at
2025-545: The uninitiated observer – collectively known as artifacts . Included are facilities, offices, furnishings, visible awards and recognition, informal dress codes, member interactions with each other and with outsiders, and company slogans , mission statements and other creeds . This model can enable understanding seemingly paradoxical behavior. For instance, an organization can profess high aesthetic and moral standards in terms of values, while violating those values should they conflict with tacit assumptions. Schein claimed that
#300699