The Constitution Review Group was a group established by the Irish government in 1995 to review the Constitution of Ireland and to recommend alterations . The group was chaired by T. K. Whitaker and had fifteen members selected from different backgrounds, though lawyers predominated.
6-643: The terms of reference for the Group were: ...to review the Constitution, and in the light of this review, to establish those areas where constitutional change may be desirable or necessary, with a view to assisting the All-Party Oireachtas Committee on the Constitution, to be established by the Oireachtas , in its work. The Group was excused by its terms of reference from considering Articles 2 and 3 of
12-399: A budget summary without detail, and a milestone-only schedule. The terms of reference are created during the earlier stages of project management by the founders of the project in question, immediately after the approval of a project business case . They are documented by the project manager and presented to the project sponsor or sponsors for approval. Once the terms have been approved,
18-563: The Constitution of Ireland and matters relating to cabinet confidentiality . The Report of the Constitution Review Group was published in July 1996 and ran to 700 pages. This is said to be the most thorough analysis of the Constitution of Ireland ever made. This Republic of Ireland politics -related article is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . Terms of reference Terms of reference ( TOR ) define
24-440: The members of the project team have a clear definition of the scope of the project. They will then be ready to progress with implementing the remaining project deliverables . This phrase "terms of reference" often refers to the task(s) assigned to a consultant or adviser. Such a consultant or adviser may be engaged via a contract with general terms of engagement that also incorporate the terms of reference that specifically describe
30-407: The purpose and structures of a project , committee , meeting , negotiation , or any similar collection of people who have agreed to work together to accomplish a shared goal. Terms of reference show how the object in question will be defined, developed, and verified. They should also provide a documented basis for making future decisions and for confirming or developing a common understanding of
36-478: The scope among stakeholders . In order to meet these criteria, success factors/risks and constraints are fundamental. They define the: TORs could include: Although the terms of reference of a project are sometimes referred to as the project charter , there are significant differences between the two. This article describes a TOR containing detailed definitions, while a project charter has high-level requirements, assumptions, constraints and descriptions as well as
#441558