Misplaced Pages

#763236

44-579: The Codex Diplomaticus Aevi Saxonici is a collection of documents from the Anglo-Saxon period preserved in manuscripts held by various libraries in England. Published in six volumes between 1839 and 1848, this was the first collected edition of the surviving corpus of Anglo-Saxon charters . This article about a non-fiction book on English history is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . Anglo-Saxon charters The term charter covers

88-618: A boundary clause that was never copied. A few boundary descriptions survive that do not appear to be related to any surviving charter. The content of these boundary descriptions varied, but in many instances these descriptions revealed the Anglo-Saxons' ideas about their landscape. Charters have provided fundamental source material for understanding Anglo-Saxon England that complements the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and other literary sources. They are often used by historians as sources for

132-675: A clause describing the boundaries of the territory that is the subject of the charter. There are also boundary descriptions in a number of leases and two wills. In the earliest examples, these boundary descriptions are short, in Latin and with few boundary points. In time, the descriptions became longer, more detailed and written in Old English. By the end of the 9th century, all boundary clauses were written in Old English. Many charters, particularly those that have survived in later copies, do not have boundary clauses. In some instances, space has been left for

176-472: A document's physical characteristics and history, and which will often be carried out in conjunction with a diplomatic analysis. The term diplomatics is therefore sometimes used in a slightly wider sense, to encompass some of these other areas (as it was in Mabillon's original work, and as is implied in the definitions of both Webster and Beal quoted above). The recent development of the science in non-English Europe

220-468: A man's career at court through his position in the witness list, as in the case of Eadric Streona at the court of Æthelred 'the Unready' in the early 11th century. Burdens that were due by landowners to the king , such as providing soldiers , resources and man-power, were sometimes relieved in charters. This gives historians the opportunity to examine aspects of Anglo-Saxon society. A joint committee of

264-461: A range of written legal documentation, including diplomas, writs and wills . A diploma was a royal charter that granted rights over land or other privileges by the king, whereas a writ was an instruction (or prohibition) by the king which may have contained evidence of rights or privileges. Diplomas were usually written on parchment in Latin , but often contained sections in the vernacular , describing

308-817: A single will from any period is known from further North than Burton upon Trent in Staffordshire . Furthermore, only 22 wills can be found in manuscripts written before 1066; originals are even rarer, as some, like those of Alfred the Great or Wulfric Spot , are known to be pre-Conquest copies, while still other may in fact be mere extracts or ancient forgeries. Only two wills of kings have been preserved, those of Alfred and Eadred , both in later copies. Anglo-Saxon women whose wills survive include Wynflæd (mother of Ælfgifu of Shaftesbury and grandmother of Kings Eadwig and Edgar ), King Edmund I 's second wife Æthelflæd and her sister Ælfflæd. A typical royal diploma had

352-552: A specialist in German history, complained that "Anglo-Saxon diplomatists persist in the belief that it is possible to be slightly dead or slightly pregnant", but Simon Keynes argues that it is unhelpful to adopt the perspective of students of Continental charters, more of which survive as originals. Anglo-Saxon charters are catalogued in Peter Sawyer 's Annotated List (1968), revised and extended online. They are usually referred to in

396-420: A system of editorial signs all features of a manuscript original. The term semi-diplomatic is used for an edition or transcription that seeks to reproduce only some of these features of the original. A diplomatic edition is thus distinguished from a normalized edition , in which the editor, while not altering the original wording of the text, renders it using normal (modern) orthography . A diplomatic edition

440-415: A tool for studying and determining the authenticity of the official charters and diplomas issued by royal and papal chanceries . It was subsequently appreciated that many of the same underlying principles could be applied to other types of official document and legal instrument , to non-official documents such as private letters , and, most recently, to the metadata of electronic records. Diplomatics

484-448: Is a scholarly discipline centred on the critical analysis of documents : especially, historical documents . It focuses on the conventions, protocols and formulae that have been used by document creators, and uses these to increase understanding of the processes of document creation, of information transmission, and of the relationships between the facts which the documents purport to record and reality. The discipline originally evolved as

SECTION 10

#1732863309764

528-611: Is expanding its scope to a cultural history of documentation including aspects of pragmatic literacy or symbolic communication . Christopher Brooke , a distinguished teacher of diplomatics, referred to the discipline's reputation in 1970 as that of "a formidable and dismal science ... a kind of game played by a few scholars, most of them medievalists, harmless so long as it does not dominate or obscure historical enquiry; or, perhaps, most commonly of all, an aid to understanding of considerable use to scholars and research students if only they had time to spare from more serious pursuits". In

572-403: Is one of the auxiliary sciences of history . It should not be confused with its sister-discipline of palaeography . In fact, its techniques have more in common with those of the literary disciplines of textual criticism and historical criticism . Despite the verbal similarity, the discipline has nothing to do with diplomacy . Both terms are derived, by separate linguistic development, from

616-432: Is possible to see who was present at the king's court. The very detailed diplomas drafted by the scribe known as " Æthelstan A " show that several Welsh kings, including Hywel Dda , attended the court of Æthelstan in the late 920s and the 930s. A person's absence from court can be equally revealing: Wulfstan I, Archbishop of York from 931 to 956, failed to attest any royal charters between 936 and 941, during which time

660-500: Is still widely seen as the "father" of diplomatics, a more important milestone in the formation of the battery of practical techniques which make up the modern discipline was the publication of René-Prosper Tassin and Charles-François Toustain 's Nouveau traité de diplomatique , which appeared in six volumes in 1750–65. The most significant work in English was Thomas Madox 's Formulare Anglicanum , published in 1702. In general, however,

704-448: The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and other literary sources. They are catalogued in Peter Sawyer 's Annotated List and are usually referred to in the specialist literature by their Sawyer number (e.g. S 407). The Anglo-Saxon charter can take many forms: it can be a lease (often presented as a chirograph ), a will, an agreement, a writ or, most commonly, a grant of land. Our picture is skewed towards those that regard land, particularly in

748-512: The Abbey of Saint-Denis . During the Middle Ages , the production of spurious charters and other documents had been common, either to provide written documentation of existing rights or to bolster the plausibility of claimed rights. Mabillon's work engendered a far livelier awareness of the potential presence of forged or spurious documents, in the fields of both history and law . Although Mabillon

792-633: The Anglo-Saxon Charters by Agnes Jane Robertson in 1939. Since 1939, contributions to the list were few and far between; in her 2011 Wills and Will-making in Anglo-Saxon England Linda Tollerton published the most up-to-date corpus, with 68 examples in total. The surviving documents are very unevenly distributed both in time and space: from the 9th century, for example, only 9 wills are known, and 6 of them are in Canterbury. Not

836-653: The Battle of Brunanburh was fought between Æthelstan and an alliance of the Hiberno-Norse king of Dublin , Olaf Guthfrithson and the Scottish king, Constantine . Wulfstan was rather independently-minded, and his absence from the West Saxon court can be linked with possible participation at Brunanburh and his later activity as a kind of kingmaker in York . It is also possible to trace

880-797: The British Academy and the Royal Historical Society was set up in 1966 to oversee a definitive edition of the entire corpus of Anglo-Saxon charters. The edition is to be published in approximately thirty volumes. The late Professor Nicholas Brooks was chairman of the committee in charge; he has been succeeded by Professor Simon Keynes . The following volumes have been published.: Supplementary volume Diplomatics Diplomatics (in American English, and in most anglophone countries), or diplomatic (in British English),

924-510: The Christian order , with a pictorial ( cross , chrismon or alpha-omega ) and a verbal invocation to God. Many early charters were granted in anticipation of the founding of a monastery . The document served a largely secular purpose – to document the legal possession of land and to free that land from certain duties that would otherwise be attached to it. The second most common form of Anglo-Saxon charter, although far fewer in number than

SECTION 20

#1732863309764

968-535: The Reformation and Counter-Reformation eras. The emergence of diplomatics as a recognisably distinct sub-discipline, however, is generally dated to the publication of Mabillon's De re diplomatica in 1681. Mabillon had begun studying old documents with a view towards establishing their authenticity as a result of the doubts raised by the Jesuit Daniel van Papenbroek over supposed Merovingian documents from

1012-430: The ancient and medieval periods, the authenticity of a document was considered to derive from the document's place of preservation and storage, in, for example, temples, public offices, and archives. As a result, those with nefarious motives were able to give forged documents a spurious authenticity by depositing them in places of authority. Diplomatics grew from a need to establish new standards of authenticity through

1056-544: The history of Anglo-Saxon England . It was frequently kings who gave land in charters. By seeing what land was awarded, it is possible to see the extent of a king's control and how he exercised his power. In 846, Æthelwulf of Wessex granted land in Devon by charter, perhaps dividing the spoils from this recently conquered territory among his men. It is possible to use charters to reconstruct models of ownership and land administration. For example, they provide an important basis for

1100-451: The boundaries of the land (boundary clause). The eschatocol was composed of a dating clause and witness-list, which usually included powerful lay and ecclesiastical members of the king's court . Much of the language of the diploma was explicitly religious – that a grant was made for the benefit of the grantor's soul or that anyone breaking the charter would be excommunicated . Charters typically opened by situating themselves firmly within

1144-425: The bounds of estates , which often correspond closely to modern parish boundaries. The writ was authenticated by a seal and gradually replaced the diploma as evidence of land tenure during the late Anglo-Saxon and early Norman periods. Land held by virtue of a charter was known as bookland . Charters have provided historians with fundamental source material for understanding Anglo-Saxon England, complementing

1188-516: The charter by invoking God and enumerating the pious considerations for the King's act (proem). The corpus was usually in Latin and named the beneficiary , recorded the grant or transfer (dispositive clause), reserved common burdens (reservation clause) and invoked the wrath of God on anyone who failed to observe it (anathema or sanction). The corpus' final section, which was often in Old English , described

1232-491: The critical analysis of the textual and physical forms of documents. The first notable application of diplomatics was by Nicolas of Cusa , in 1433, and Lorenzo Valla , in 1440, who determined, independently, that the Donation of Constantine , which had been used for centuries to legitimize papal temporal authority, was a forgery. Diplomatic techniques were further developed as part of a wider battery of antiquarian skills during

1276-511: The difference in person, place, time, and matter, which are meant to serve as a testimony of proceedings of a legal nature". Properly speaking, and as usually understood by present-day scholars, diplomatics is concerned essentially with the analysis and interpretation of the linguistic and textual elements of a document. It is, however, closely associated with several parallel disciplines, including palaeography , sigillography , codicology , and provenance studies, all of which are concerned with

1320-466: The diploma, is the royal writ. These differed from the diploma in both form and function. A writ was an instruction from the king to a named official or group of recipients. It started with a greeting and was authenticated by a royal seal. The writ did not require witnesses and was often written in Old English . Under the Normans, the use of writs was extended to cover many other aspects of royal business and

1364-668: The discipline as "the study of the Wesen [being] and Werden [becoming] of documentation, the analysis of genesis, inner constitution and transmission of documents, and of their relationship with the facts represented in them and with their creators". The Commission International de Diplomatique has defined diplomatics as "the science which studies the tradition, the form and the issuing of written documents". More pragmatically, Peter Beal defines diplomatics as "the science or study of documents and records, including their forms, language, script and meaning. It involves knowledge of such matters as

Codex Diplomaticus Aevi Saxonici - Misplaced Pages Continue

1408-692: The discipline was always studied more intensively by continental scholars than by those in Britain. Diplomatics is often associated with the study of documents of the medieval period. However, scholars such as Luciana Duranti have argued that many of its theories and principles can be adapted and applied to contemporary archival science . The study of diplomatics is a valuable tool for historians , enabling them to determine whether alleged historical documents and archives are in fact genuine or forgeries . Its techniques may also be used to help date undated documents. Diplomatics has many similar applications in

1452-454: The discussion of early medieval Fenland . Some scholars employ charters to analyse Roman infrastructure and the relationship of early medieval inhabitants of Britain to the Roman past. The way these documents use Roman remains in and outside of boundary clauses can tell us a lot about how the past was understood and constructed. Charters give lists of persons that attested the document and so it

1496-496: The earlier period. Land charters can further be subdivided into royal charters , or diplomas, and private charters (donations by figures other than the king). Over a thousand Anglo-Saxon charters are extant today, as a result of being maintained in the archives of religious houses . These preserved their charters so as to record their right to land. The oldest extant original charter, now in Canterbury Cathedral archive,

1540-473: The established wording and procedures of particular kinds of document, the deciphering of writing, and document analysis and authentication". Theo Kölzer defines diplomatics as "the teaching and the study of charters". He treats the terms "charter", "diploma", and "document" as broadly synonymous, and refers to the German scholar Harry Bresslau 's definition of "documents" as "written declarations recorded in compliance with certain forms alternating according to

1584-489: The field of law . Some famous cases in which the principles of diplomatics have been employed have included: A diplomatic edition is an edition (in print or online) of an historic manuscript text that seeks to reproduce as accurately as possible in typography all significant features of the manuscript original, including spelling and punctuation, abbreviations, deletions, insertions, and other alterations. Similarly, diplomatic transcription attempts to represent by means of

1628-414: The mid-13th century at Wilton Abbey , still includes a significant amount of Anglo-Saxon material. The importance of charters in legal disputes over land as evidence of land tenure, gave rise to numerous charter forgeries , sometimes by those same monastic houses in whose archives they were preserved. The primary motivation for forging charters was to provide evidence of rights to land. Often forging

1672-410: The original form, whilst others are post- Conquest copies, that were often made by the compilers of cartularies (collections of title-deeds ) or by early modern antiquaries . The earliest cartularies containing copies of Anglo-Saxon charters come from Worcester, early-11th-century Liber Wigorniensis and Hemming's Cartulary of a century later; a much later example, Wilton Cartulary , compiled in

1716-475: The specialist literature by their Sawyer number (e.g. S 407). The three most common forms of Anglo-Saxon charter are diplomas, writs and wills. They are certified by the attestations of witnesses, who are listed at the end of the charter. The largest number of surviving charters are diplomas, or royal charters, that granted privileges and rights, usually over land. The typical diploma had three sections: protocol , corpus , and eschatocol . The protocol opened

1760-470: The word diploma , which originally referred to a folded piece of writing material—and thus both to the materials which are the focus of study in diplomatics, and to accreditation papers carried by diplomats. The word diplomatics was effectively coined by the Benedictine monk Jean Mabillon , who in 1681 published his treatise, De re diplomatica ( Latin : roughly, "The Study of Documents"). From there,

1804-494: The word entered the French language as diplomatique , and then English as diplomatic or diplomatics . Webster's Dictionary (1828) defines diplomatics as the "science of diplomas, or of ancient writings, literary and public documents, letters, decrees, charters, codicils, etc., which has for its object to decipher old writings, to ascertain their authenticity, their date, signatures, etc." Giorgio Cencetti (1908–1970) defined

Codex Diplomaticus Aevi Saxonici - Misplaced Pages Continue

1848-720: Was focussed on providing written evidence for the holdings recorded as belonging to a religious house in the Domesday Book . It is important when studying charters to establish their authenticity. The study of charters to determine authenticity gave rise to diplomatics – the science of ancient documents. Relatively few charters survive in their form as single sheets, and copies may have been altered for various purposes. Historians attempt to extract useful information from all types of charters, even outright fabrications, which may be of interest because they are apparently based on genuine documentation or for some other reason. Timothy Reuter ,

1892-481: Was issued in 679 by King Hlothhere of Kent granting land to the Reculver Abbey . Some surviving charters are later copies, which sometimes include interpolations . Anglo-Saxon charters were sometimes used in legal disputes , and the recording of the contents of a charter within a legal document has ensured the survival of text when the original charter has been lost. Overall, some two hundred charters exist in

1936-534: Was written in Latin. Florence Harmer provided the text (and translation when written in Old English) of 120 pre-Conquest royal writs. Anglo-Saxon wills were intended to make gifts of property (including land) after the writer's death, but they were not wills in the modern sense. Wills are rarer than writs. The first dedicated study, Anglo-Saxon Wills by Dorothy Whitelock was able to identify 39 documents. The number grew to 55 with publication of another 16 among

#763236