Misplaced Pages

Cabcharge

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

The Cabcharge account payment system was established in 1976 to provide taxi passengers a way to pay for taxi fares by non-cash means. The payment system is owned and operated by A2B Australia (formerly Cabcharge Australia), part of ComfortDelGro . In the UK and Singapore, Cabcharge is operated by other subsidiaries of ComfortDelGro.

#590409

36-498: Cabcharge Australia's commercial activities, in which the Cabcharge payment system is an integral part, have been controversial at times and the company has faced regular accusations of excessive charging or profiteering and predatory and anti-competitive practices . The company was recently subject to adverse court proceedings and a major settlement arising from these behaviours. The Cabcharge system has several aspects: Though called

72-506: A particular focus on service outcomes. The inquiry should conduct broad ranging consultation to determine the views at all levels, including consultation with the general public and expert industry and other key stakeholders. The inquiry will report regularly to the Minister for Public Transport and make a final report and recommendations focusing in particular on the following: The Inquiry issued an issues paper on 12 May 2011 called "Setting

108-470: A result, it is drafting new rules to compel offenders to limit their charges to the costs actually incurred by merchants, and that "In the gun will be the 10% charge imposed by Cabcharge and similar companies for using credit cards to pay taxi fares..." The Taxi Industry Inquiry headed by Professor Fels has made a number of major criticisms of Cabcharge and its activities in a recent report. The Australian consumer magazine Choice confers awards annually,

144-415: A service fee by Cabcharge, to the general public and government authorities the charge for processing credit card payments is commonly referred to as a surcharge, and in the case of Cabcharge the initial 10% charge has given rise to controversy, litigation and government legislative intervention. Cabcharge has been criticised for the 10% surcharge it collects on taxi fares paid by credit and debit cards and for

180-664: A similar report on 13 May 2011. The Victorian Government introduced legislation in early June 2011 to provide support to the Inquiry including by establishing a statutory authority, the Taxi Services Commission , to give clear organisational separation to the Inquiry and to provide the inquiry with sufficient powers to obtain information and report to Government. Introducing the Transport Legislation Amendment (Taxi Services Reform and Other Matters) Bill 2011 ,

216-642: The Australian Competition & Consumer Commission , and leading card companies. The 10% charge was reviewed by the Reserve Bank of Australia in 2012. It was found to be excessive and predatory, and in February 2013 Victoria was the first State to restrict the surcharge to 5%, following recommendations made by the Taxi Industry Inquiry , and a further review of the surcharge in that State may lead to

252-669: The Australian Securities Exchange in December 1999. It later diversified and its key activities included technology, taxi payments and major acquisitions in the Australian bus industry through ComfortDelGro. The company's activities are sometimes controversial and it has faced criticism at times from inquiries and regulatory bodies. Cabcharge has been the subject of recent Federal Court proceedings over alleged anti-competitive practices including predatory pricing activities and

288-501: The Taxi Services Commission . The inquiry was headed by Professor Allan Fels assisted by Dr David Cousins. The Inquiry was announced on 28 March 2011 by the Premier of Victoria , Ted Baillieu . According to Bailleu, the key problems with the Victorian taxi industry were: Baillieu announced that Professor Fels would investigate every aspect of the current industry. It is obvious that

324-594: The Third World such as baby milk (see Nestlé boycott ). Profiteering is illegal in several countries, including but not limited to: This article related to microeconomics is a stub . You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it . Taxi Industry Inquiry The Taxi Industry Inquiry or the Fels Inquiry was an inquiry commissioned in 2011 into the taxi industry and taxi services in Victoria , Australia, by

360-488: The Cabcharge system. Legge noted that the ACCC penalised Cabcharge $ 15 million for abusing its industry dominance. RBA data is reported as showing that banks charge merchants an average fee of 0.81 per cent to process Visa or MasterCard payments, while the average fee passed on from the merchant to customers is 1.9 per cent for Visa and 1.8 per cent for MasterCard. The RBA considered that some companies charges are excessive and, as

396-572: The Department of Transport), get on with it, keep it simple and output focussed (rather than process focussed), look after the industry participants, and respect those who have built the industry – and bingo, the public will be better off. However, the head of the Taxi Industry Inquiry, Professor Allan Fels observed that This is an industry like any other that is there to serve a customer. We're not there to service them (the industry). One of

SECTION 10

#1732872945591

432-552: The Inquiry would consider the cost of a taxi licence – currently about $ 500,000 – and whether this allowed enough access to the industry. The industry's regulatory body, the Victorian Taxi Directorate, is also in his sights. "The whole system of regulation is on the agenda and it is also true the Government has legislated already to set up a Taxi Services Commission to come into play after our report," he said. "The VTD at

468-488: The Minister for Public Transport, Terry Mulder commented that the measure - The resultant Act established the Taxi Services Commission as a body corporate under the Transport Integration Act 2010 along with the other central transport bodies. The Act has four parts. Parts 2 and 3 set out the two major stages for the commission. In its first stage, the commission is conducting a comprehensive inquiry, i.e.

504-453: The Reserve Bank of Australia to help lower the 10% surcharge. He has been reported as observing monopolistic behaviours by Cabcharge. Representatives from major credit card operators Visa and Mastercard also criticised the 10% fee: Cabcharge was making taxi passengers pay more than 10 times the average "merchant fee" charged by banks, and five times more than the average fee charged by retailers, based on Reserve Bank data. Surcharges in

540-461: The Reserve Bank of Australia to help lower the 10% surcharge. He has been reported as saying that - Representatives from major credit card operators Visa and MasterCard have also criticised the 10% fee. Visa spokesman Adam Wand yesterday said Cabcharge was making taxi passengers pay more than ten times the average merchant fee charged by banks, and five times more than the average fee charged by retailers, based on Reserve Bank data. "Surcharges in

576-580: The Scene". The paper set out the background to the Inquiry and raised a number of issues about the performance and state of Victoria's taxi industry. The Inquiry called for public submissions in response to the paper by 24 June 2011. The Herald Sun newspaper reported on 12 May 2011 major problems with the performance of taxi services in Melbourne under a headline "Customer satisfaction with Melbourne's taxi services hits all-time low." The Age newspaper included

612-464: The Shonky Awards, to recognise Australia's poorest or "shonkiest" products. Choice states that the competition "recognises and reprimands misleading claims, false advertising, lack of transparency, faulty goods and/or poor service." Cabcharge was awarded a Shonky Award in 2012 for its 10% surcharge on taxi fares paid by card. Profiteering (business) Profiteering is a pejorative term for

648-589: The act of making a profit by methods considered unethical . Business owners may be accused of profiteering when they raise prices during an emergency ( especially a war ). The term is also applied to businesses that play on political corruption to obtain government contracts. Some types of profiteering are illegal, such as price fixing syndicates, for example on fuel subsidies (see British Airways price-fixing allegations ), and other anti-competitive behaviour. Some are restricted by industry codes of conduct, e.g. aggressive marketing of products in

684-648: The commission was established. During the second stage staff and resources from the VTD will move to the new body as it assumes the ongoing role of regulator. The terms of reference issued for the Inquiry were to review the sector and its performance against the following principles: The overall aim of the inquiry was to instigate major and enduring improvements to service, safety and competition to Victoria's taxi and hire car industry. The inquiry should be wide-ranging and consider all point to point transport services including taxis, hire cars and other demand responsive services with

720-400: The company to exert substantial and anti-competitive control over most of the Australian taxi industry and to engage in profiteering activity. Cabcharge was criticised for the 10% surcharge it collects on taxi fares paid by credit and debit cards and for the general anti-competitive control it exerts on other industry participants through its control of electronic payments and other areas of

756-512: The controversial features of the taxi industry in Australia is the influence of Cabcharge . The Taxi Industry Inquiry considered this issue as part of the Taxi Industry Inquiry and the company has been the subject of several observations by Professor Fels since the Inquiry commenced. The Cabcharge account payment system was established in 1976 to provide a way to pay for taxi fares throughout Australia and participating countries. Cabcharge listed on

SECTION 20

#1732872945591

792-424: The cost of the transaction." Victoria legislated in late June 2013 to limit the surcharge to 5% or less from 1 February 2014, following recommendations of the Taxi Industry Inquiry . The Essential Services Commission is required to review the charge, which may lead to the surcharge being reduced below 5%, to reflect Cabcharge's reasonable cost of providing a non-cash payment option in taxis. New South Wales reduced

828-494: The current Taxi Industry Inquiry. Accordingly, the Act essentially provides the commission with secure powers and authority to enable it to fulfil its task. The Minister made a number of comments about the wide scope of the Inquiry - Professor Fels has indicated that the reform task in the Victorian taxi industry is substantial. He has warned that the taxi industry required a "very deep review that looks at fundamental questions about how

864-501: The current industry structure and regulation has failed. It has entrenched a lack of accountability for on-the-ground taxi services by the major industry participants. These issues are long-standing and deep-rooted and the Coalition Government has a responsibility to improve the level of service to customers who utilise the taxi industry. The Premier indicated that reforming the Victorian taxi industry would occur in two stages. In

900-562: The figure being set at well below 5%. In December 2014 the surcharge was also reduced to 5% in New South Wales . Western Australia reduced the surcharge to 5% in February 2015. The practice was also investigated by the Reserve Bank of Australia . Cabcharge provides EFTPOS terminals, free of charge or below cost, to approximately 97% of taxis in Australia. However, there are competitors like Live taxi and Motorpass . Cabcharge justifies

936-502: The first stage, the Fels Inquiry completed a comprehensive inquiry into the service, safety and competition issues in the Victorian taxi industry. In the second stage, a Taxi Services Commission will take over the role of industry regulator, giving it the powers and tools necessary to reform the taxi industry. The Premier indicated that the current taxi industry regulator, the Victorian Taxi Directorate (VTD), will operate as normal until

972-417: The general anti-competitive control it exerts on other industry participants through its control of electronic payments and other areas of the taxi system such as vehicle and related repairs and installation of in-vehicle equipment, insurance, vehicle leasing and training. Criticism has emanated from various sources including the chair of the Taxi Industry Inquiry , Professor Allan Fels , the former head of

1008-522: The moment is a separate regulatory body we are reviewing because regulation is part of the set of problems. " The Victorian Taxi Association (VTA), which represents taxi networks and operators, has indicated "...support for an inquiry but not an inquisition". The Chief Executive of the VTA has commented that: ...if the inquiry is to be of any value it has to look into the VTD/DOT (the Victorian Taxi Directorate and

1044-446: The order of 10 per cent are simply excessive and way above the cost of accepting a Visa card," he said. "It's certainly more than 10 times the average Reserve Bank published cost." Mastercard head of strategy David Masters said there was "no way" that credit-card processing could cost Cabcharge 10 per cent of a fare. "I don't know how they can justify it," he said. "There is no question it pads out their bottom line, rather than reflecting

1080-655: The order of 10 per cent are simply excessive and way above the cost of accepting a Visa card. It's certainly more than 10 times the average Reserve Bank published cost. There was "no way" that credit-card processing could cost Cabcharge 10 per cent of a fare. I don't know how they can justify it. There is no question it pads out their bottom line, rather than reflecting the cost of the transaction. In an article in Victoria's Herald Sun newspaper, John Legge noted that customers in that state paid at least $ 350 million in taxi fares with banking cards, for which 95% of Victoria's taxis use

1116-431: The surcharge on the basis that it incurs the costs associated with transactions including card and other product production, in-taxi processing, administration, fraud protection and investigation, provision of statements and driver education. However, this situation also allows the company to exert substantial and anti-competitive control over most of the Australian taxi industry. Professor Allan Fels recently approached

Cabcharge - Misplaced Pages Continue

1152-429: The surcharge to 5% from 12 December 2014. Western Australia reduced the surcharge to 5% from 24 February 2015. Reserve Bank (RBA) data is reported as showing that banks charge merchants an average fee of 0.81% to process Visa or Mastercard payments, while the average fee passed on from the merchant to customers is 1.9% for Visa and 1.8% for MasterCard. The RBA considers that some companies charges are excessive and, as

1188-459: The taxi system such as vehicle and related repairs and installation of in-vehicle equipment, insurance, vehicle leasing and training. Criticism has emanated from various sources including the chair of the Taxi Industry Inquiry, Professor Fels, the former head of the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC), and leading card companies. The 10% charge was later reviewed by the Reserve Bank of Australia. In 2011 Professor Fels approached

1224-464: The whole system works. "It's not just about patching the system up with a little bit of regulation here and modification there," he said. "We need to look at an industry that is not performing well systematically. " Professor Fels said the Inquiry's "Setting the Scene" paper had received more than 140 submissions, with 40 from people with disabilities. He has reported finding disturbingly high rates of poor taxi services across Victoria. He has indicated

1260-459: Was recently subject to adverse court proceedings and a major settlement arising from these behaviours. Cabcharge provides EFTPOS terminals, free of charge, to approximately 97% of taxis in Australia. The company incurs the costs associated with transactions including card and other product production, in-taxi processing, administration, fraud protection and investigation, provision of statements and driver education. However, this situation also allows

1296-528: Was subjected to a record high $ 15 million settlement for these behaviours. The company also faced criticism of profiteering for the 10% surcharge it imposed on taxi fares paid by card and the matter was later investigated by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). Cabcharge's principal activities include: Cabcharge's commercial activities have been controversial at times and the company has faced regular accusations of excessive charging or profiteering and predatory and anti-competitive practices . The company

#590409