Misplaced Pages

#164835

92-421: CVLT generates a wide variety of measures: The original CVLT was normed on a 'reference sample' of 273 nonclinical subjects. The experimenter reads a list of 16 nouns aloud, at one-second intervals, in fixed order, over five learning trials (list A). After each trial, the subject is asked to recall as many words as they can in any order (i.e., free recall). A big feature, compared to other verbal learning tests,

184-406: A necessary consequence of its premises. An argument that is not valid is said to be "invalid". An example of a valid (and sound ) argument is given by the following well-known syllogism : What makes this a valid argument is not that it has true premises and a true conclusion. Validity is about the tie in relationship between the two premises the necessity of the conclusion. There needs to be

276-459: A neural network . The defining feature of a semantic network is that its links are almost always directed (that is, they only point in one direction, from a base to a target) and the links come in many different types, each one standing for a particular relationship that can hold between any two nodes. Semantic networks see the most use in models of discourse and logical comprehension , as well as in artificial intelligence . In these models,

368-465: A case study of an individual who had impairments for vegetables and animals, while their category for food remained intact. Modality refers to a semantic category of meaning that has to do with necessity and probability expressed through language. In linguistics, certain expressions are said to have modal meanings. A few examples of this include conditionals , auxiliary verbs , adverbs, and nouns. When looking at category-specific semantic deficits, there

460-400: A chicken a meteor?") when the relevant nodes are very far apart in the network. TLC is an instance of a more general class of models known as semantic networks . In a semantic network, each node is to be interpreted as representing a specific concept, word, or feature; each node is a symbol. Semantic networks generally do not employ distributed representations for concepts, as may be found in

552-738: A considerable body of research. The temporal stability of the CVLT-II is still essential to determine its usefulness in measuring cognitive change. The retest reliability and practice effects are consisted with those for the original CVLT and other list-learning and memory tasks such as the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT -R). The reliability ranges from 0.68 to 0.94 The CVLT-C is usually administered to children aged 5–16 to evaluate mild to severe learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder, intellectual disability and other neurological disorders. It also provides information for

644-494: A deficit of non-biological objects (artifacts). Modality-based theories assume that if there is damage to modality-specific knowledge, then all the categories that fall under it will be damaged. In this case, damage to the visual modality would result in a deficit for all biological objects with no deficits restricted to the more specific categories. For example, there would be no category specific semantic deficits for just "animals" or just "fruits and vegetables". Semantic dementia

736-421: A false conclusion, and it is equally valid: No matter how the universe might be constructed, it could never be the case that these arguments should turn out to have simultaneously true premises but a false conclusion. The above arguments may be contrasted with the following invalid one: In this case, the conclusion contradicts the deductive logic of the preceding premises, rather than deriving from it. Therefore,

828-559: A final normative reference sample consisting of 1087 individuals in the US. The education level was also included as a stratification variable. Reliability data for the CVLT-II is mostly good, ranging from 0.80 to 0.96 in a mixed neuro-psychiatric sample. Test-retest reliability was also adequate. Validity data for the CVLT-II builds on the vast existing clinical validity data on the original CVLT. They demonstrate comparable mean scores and standard deviations, and significant correlations between

920-444: A formula is valid if all such interpretations make it true. An inference is valid if all interpretations that validate the premises validate the conclusion. This is known as semantic validity . In truth-preserving validity, the interpretation under which all variables are assigned a truth value of 'true' produces a truth value of 'true'. In a false-preserving validity, the interpretation under which all variables are assigned

1012-414: A larger conceptual idea by using amodal views (also known as amodal perception ). Instead of being representations in modality-specific systems, semantic memory representations had previously been viewed as redescriptions of modality-specific states. Some accounts of category-specific semantic deficits that are amodal remain even though researchers are beginning to find support for theories in which knowledge

SECTION 10

#1732901617165

1104-470: A length such that some links take longer to traverse than others. All these features of networks have been employed in models of semantic memory. One of the first examples of a network model of semantic memory is the teachable language comprehender (TLC). In this model, each node is a word, representing a concept (like bird ). Within each node is stored a set of properties (like "can fly" or "has wings") as well as links to other nodes (like chicken ). A node

1196-413: A narrow range of memory performance. The conclusion that was reached was that it provided valuable qualitative information, but it failed to provide normative data It includes the addition of a forced choice trial to assess level of effort, the inclusion of recall discriminability indices, which takes into account the number of correct words recalled but also take into account words that were not on

1288-468: A pear, knowledge of grasping, chewing, sights, sounds, and tastes used to encode episodic experiences of a pear are recalled through sensorimotor simulation. A grounded simulation approach refers to context-specific re-activations that integrate the important features of episodic experience into a current depiction. Such research has challenged previously utilized amodal views. The brain encodes multiple inputs such as words and pictures to integrate and create

1380-449: A relationship established between the premises i.e., a middle term between the premises. If you just have two unrelated premises there is no argument. Notice some of the terms repeat: men is a variation man in premises one and two, Socrates and the term mortal repeats in the conclusion. The argument would be just as valid if both premises and conclusion were false. The following argument is of the same logical form but with false premises and

1472-585: A sentence by comparing the feature sets that represent its subject and predicate concepts. Such computational feature-comparison models include the ones proposed by Meyer (1970), Rips (1975), and Smith et al. (1974). Early work in perceptual and conceptual categorization assumed that categories had critical features and that category membership could be determined by logical rules for the combination of features. More recent theories have accepted that categories may have an ill-defined or "fuzzy" structure and have proposed probabilistic or global similarity models for

1564-401: A specific category (e.g., apples used rather than bananas). Free and cued recall of list A are tested immediately (short-delay), and again after 20 minutes (long-delay). In cued recall, the experimenter prompts the subjects with the word category. The CVLT ends with a recognition task, where the experimenter presents the subject with a 44-word list, and the subject must indicate whether it

1656-464: A specific context, where the strength of that association determined by how long each item is present in a given context. In SAM, memories consist of a set of associations between items in memory and between items and contexts. The presence of a set of items and/or a context is more likely to evoke some subset of the items in memory. The degree to which items evoke one another—either by virtue of their shared context or their co-occurrence—is an indication of

1748-462: A specific memory of stroking a particular cat. Semantic memory and episodic memory are both types of explicit memory (or declarative memory) , or memory of facts or events that can be consciously recalled and "declared". The counterpart to declarative or explicit memory is implicit memory (also known as nondeclarative memory). The idea of semantic memory was first introduced following a conference in 1972 between Endel Tulving and W. Donaldson on

1840-470: A time) and were asked different questions. In the second phase of the experiment, 60 "old words" seen in stage one and 20 "new words" not shown in stage one were presented to the subjects one at a time. The subjects were given one of two tasks: Results showed that the percentage of correct answers in the semantic task (perceptual identification) did not change with the encoding conditions of appearance, sound, or meaning. The percentage of correct answers for

1932-599: Is valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false . It is not required for a valid argument to have premises that are actually true, but to have premises that, if they were true, would guarantee the truth of the argument's conclusion. Valid arguments must be clearly expressed by means of sentences called well-formed formulas (also called wffs or simply formulas ). The validity of an argument can be tested, proved or disproved, and depends on its logical form . In logic, an argument

SECTION 20

#1732901617165

2024-403: Is a part) as "chunks", which consist of a label, a set of defined relationships to other chunks (e.g., "this is a _", or "this has a _"), and any number of chunk-specific properties. Chunks can be mapped as a semantic network, given that each node is a chunk with its unique properties, and each link is the chunk's relationship to another chunk. In ACT, a chunk's activation decreases as a function of

2116-400: Is a semantic memory disorder that causes patients to lose the ability to match words or images to their meanings. It is fairly rare for patients with semantic dementia to develop category specific impairments, though there have been documented cases of it occurring. Typically, a more generalized semantic impairment results from dimmed semantic representations in the brain. Alzheimer's disease

2208-403: Is a set of related statements expressing the premises (which may consists of non-empirical evidence, empirical evidence or may contain some axiomatic truths) and an necessary conclusion based on the relationship of the premises. An argument is valid if and only if it would be contradictory for the conclusion to be false if all of the premises are true. Validity does not require the truth of

2300-454: Is a subcategory of semantic dementia which can cause similar symptoms. The main difference between the two is that Alzheimer's is categorized by atrophy to both sides of the brain, while semantic dementia is categorized by loss of brain tissue in the front portion of the left temporal lobe. With Alzheimer's disease in particular, interactions with semantic memory produce different patterns in deficits between patients and categories over time which

2392-431: Is a target word or a distractor. Some distractors share semantic categories with the target words while others sound alike. The 44-word list is presented like shopping list as it was argued that this is an activity that people face in their everyday activities. Background participant information about age, sex, and ethnicity are recorded for demographic purposes. The words have an average of 2.37 syllables and there are 64% of

2484-445: Is above threshold, it is retrieved; otherwise an "error of omission" has occurred and the item has been forgotten. There is also retrieval latency, which varies inversely with the amount by which the activation of the retrieved chunk exceeds the retrieval threshold. This latency is used to measure the response time of the ACT model and compare it to human performance. Some models characterize

2576-403: Is another kind of modality that looks at word relationships which is much more relevant to these disorders and impairments. For category-specific impairments, there are modality-specific theories that are based on a few general predictions. These theories state that damage to the visual modality will result in a deficit of biological objects, while damage to the functional modality will result in

2668-516: Is caused by distorted representations in the brain. For example, in the initial onset of Alzheimer's disease, patients have mild difficulty with the artifacts category. As the disease progresses, the category specific semantic deficits progress as well, and patients see a more concrete deficit with natural categories. In other words, the deficit tends to be worse with living things as opposed to non-living things. Validity (logic) In logic , specifically in deductive reasoning , an argument

2760-471: Is chosen. The buffer size is defined as r , and not a fixed number, and as items are rehearsed in the buffer the associative strengths grow linearly as a function of the total time inside the buffer. In SAM, when any two items simultaneously occupy a working memory buffer, the strength of their association is incremented; items that co-occur more often are more strongly associated. Items in SAM are also associated with

2852-600: Is conducted to assess test-retest reliability . Primary learning, recall and recognition measures are recorded as well as the more detailed process measures such as errors , contrast scores, and ratio. It is suggested that a general verbal learning component consistently accounts for about 35-40% of the total variance and consists of total free recall over the five trials of list A, semantic clustering free and cued recall (both short- and long-delays), and recognition hits. A second, "response discrimination" component has also been found in most studies. It accounts for about 8-10% of

California Verbal Learning Test - Misplaced Pages Continue

2944-430: Is directly linked to those nodes of which it is either a subclass or superclass (i.e., bird would be connected to both chicken and animal ). Properties are stored at the highest category level to which they apply; for example, "is yellow" would be stored with canary , "has wings" would be stored with bird (one level up), and "can move" would be stored with animal (another level up). Nodes may also store negations of

3036-419: Is intertwined in experience and dependent on culture . New concepts are learned by applying knowledge learned from things in the past. Semantic memory is distinct from episodic memory —the memory of experiences and specific events that occur in one's life that can be recreated at any given point. For instance, semantic memory might contain information about what a cat is, whereas episodic memory might contain

3128-434: Is not affected by the truth of the premise or the truth of the conclusion. The following deduction is perfectly valid: The problem with the argument is that it is not sound . In order for a deductive argument to be sound, the argument must be valid and all the premises must be true. Model theory analyzes formulae with respect to particular classes of interpretation in suitable mathematical structures. On this reading,

3220-412: Is reflected through their co-occurrence in a local context. WAS was developed by analyzing a database of free association norms, and is where "words that have similar associative structures are placed in similar regions of space". The adaptive control of thought (ACT) (and later ACT-R (Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational) ) theory of cognition represents declarative memory (of which semantic memory

3312-475: Is selectively impaired while other categories remain undamaged. This condition can result in brain damage that is widespread, patchy, or localized. Research suggests that the temporal lobe, more specifically the structural description system, might be responsible for category specific impairments of semantic memory disorders. Theories on category-specific semantic deficits tend to fall into two different groups based on their underlying principles. Theories based on

3404-508: Is stored by the same brain systems involved in episodic memory , that is, the medial temporal lobes , including the hippocampal formation . In this system, the hippocampal formation "encodes" memories, or makes it possible for memories to form at all, and the neocortex stores memories after the initial encoding process is completed. Recently, new evidence has been presented in support of a more precise interpretation of this hypothesis. The hippocampal formation includes, among other structures:

3496-404: Is stored in semantic memory is the "gist" of experience, an abstract structure that applies to a wide variety of experiential objects and delineates categorical and functional relationships between such objects. There are numerous sub-theories related to semantic memory that have developed since Tulving initially posited his argument on the differences between semantic and episodic memory; an example

3588-487: Is that the words are drawn from four semantic categories (tools, fruits, clothing, spices and herbs), with no consecutive words from the same category. If a subject 'clusters' words from a category together, it is probable that they are using semantic organisation. An interference list (list B) is presented that shares two categories from List A (e.g., fruit and tools) and has two unshared categories (e.g., fish and kitchen utensils). However, neither list uses common words for

3680-431: Is that whether an argument is valid is a matter of the argument's logical form. Many techniques are employed by logicians to represent an argument's logical form. A simple example, applied to two of the above illustrations, is the following: Let the letters 'P', 'Q', and 'S' stand, respectively, for the set of men, the set of mortals, and Socrates. Using these symbols, the first argument may be abbreviated as: Similarly,

3772-436: Is the belief in hierarchies of semantic memory, in which different information one has learned with specific levels of related knowledge is associated. According to this theory, brains are able to associate specific information with other disparate ideas despite not having unique memories that correspond to when that knowledge was stored in the first place. This theory of hierarchies has also been applied to episodic memory, as in

California Verbal Learning Test - Misplaced Pages Continue

3864-522: Is the number of items in memory; each cell of the matrix corresponds to the strength of the association between the row item and the column item. Learning of associations is generally believed to be a Hebbian process, where whenever two items in memory are simultaneously active, the association between them grows stronger, and the more likely either item is to activate the other. See below for specific operationalizations of associative models. A standard model of memory that employs association in this manner

3956-572: Is the probability that context i {\displaystyle i} is active, given that item t {\displaystyle t} has occurred (this is obtained simply by dividing the raw frequency, M t , d {\displaystyle \mathbf {M} _{t,d}} by the total of the item vector, ∑ i = 0 D M t , i {\displaystyle \sum _{i=0}^{D}\mathbf {M} _{t,i}} ). The Hyperspace Analogue to Language (HAL) model considers context only as

4048-453: Is the search of associative memory (SAM) model. Though SAM was originally designed to model episodic memory, its mechanisms are sufficient to support some semantic memory representations. The model contains a short-term store (STS) and long-term store (LTS), where STS is a briefly activated subset of the information in the LTS. The STS has limited capacity and affects the retrieval process by limiting

4140-641: Is the sum of all knowledge one has obtained—vocabulary, understanding of math, or all the facts one knows. In his book titled Episodic and Semantic Memory , Tulving adopted the term semantic from linguists to refer to a system of memory for "words and verbal symbols, their meanings and referents, the relations between them, and the rules, formulas, or algorithms for influencing them". The use of semantic memory differs from episodic memory: semantic memory refers to general facts and meanings one shares with others, while episodic memory refers to unique and concrete personal experiences. Tulving's proposal of this distinction

4232-423: Is tied to modality-specific brain regions. The concept that semantic representations are grounded across modality-specific brain regions can be supported by episodic and semantic memory appearing to function in different yet mutually dependent ways. The distinction between semantic and episodic memory has become a part of the broader scientific discourse. For example, researchers speculate that semantic memory captures

4324-530: Is true under every possible interpretation of the language. In propositional logic, they are tautologies . A statement can be called valid, i.e. logical truth, in some systems of logic like in Modal logic if the statement is true in all interpretations. In Aristotelian logic statements are not valid per se. Validity refers to entire arguments. The same is true in propositional logic (statements can be true or false but not called valid or invalid). Validity of deduction

4416-416: Is used clinically to examine patients with different neuropsychological impairments, but has also helped to understand the properties of the test. For example, immediate recall and long-delayed recall were highly correlated (above r=0.80) for normal patients and those with Huntington's disease, but the variables were only correlated at 0.36 for patients with Alzheimer's disease. The finding suggests that

4508-406: The memoria concept dealt with memories that did not reference experiences having an autobiographic index. Semantic memory reflects the knowledge of the world, and the term general knowledge is often used. It holds generic information that is more than likely acquired across various contexts and is used across different situations. According to Madigan in his book titled Memory , semantic memory

4600-472: The acquisition of semantic information as a form of statistical inference from a set of discrete experiences, distributed across a number of contexts . Though these models differ in specifics, they generally employ an (Item × Context) matrix where each cell represents the number of times an item in memory has occurred in a given context. Semantic information is gleaned by performing a statistical analysis of this matrix. Many of these models bear similarity to

4692-464: The algorithms used in search engines , though it is not yet clear whether they really use the same computational mechanisms. One of the more popular models is latent semantic analysis (LSA). In LSA, a T × D matrix is constructed from a text corpus , where T is the number of terms in the corpus and D is the number of documents (here "context" is interpreted as "document" and only words—or word phrases—are considered as items in memory). Each cell in

SECTION 50

#1732901617165

4784-452: The amount of information that can be sampled and limiting the time the sampled subset is in an active mode. The retrieval process in LTS is cue dependent and probabilistic, meaning that a cue initiates the retrieval process and the selected information from memory is random. The probability of being sampled is dependent on the strength of association between the cue and the item being retrieved, with stronger associations being sampled before one

4876-539: The argument is logically 'invalid', even though the conclusion could be considered 'true' in general terms. The premise 'All men are immortal' would likewise be deemed false outside of the framework of classical logic. However, within that system 'true' and 'false' essentially function more like mathematical states such as binary 1s and 0s than the philosophical concepts normally associated with those terms. Formal arguments that are invalid are often associated with at least one fallacy which should be verifiable. A standard view

4968-488: The brain itself, assume that organization is internal. These theories assume that natural selective pressures have caused neural circuits specific to certain domains to be formed, and that these are dedicated to problem-solving and survival. Animals, plants, and tools are all examples of specific circuits that would be formed based on this theory. Category-specific semantic deficits tend to fall into two different categories, each of which can be spared or emphasized depending on

5060-458: The brain. Other research suggests that both semantic memory and episodic memory are part of a singular declarative memory system, yet represent different sectors and parts within the greater whole. Different areas within the brain are activated depending on whether semantic or episodic memory is accessed. Category-specific semantic impairments are a neuropsychological occurrence in which an individual ability to identify certain categories of objects

5152-417: The case of work by William Brewer on the concept of autobiographical memory. Networks of various sorts play an integral part in many theories of semantic memory. Generally speaking, a network is composed of a set of nodes connected by links. The nodes may represent concepts, words, perceptual features, or nothing at all. The links may be weighted such that some are stronger than others or, equivalently, have

5244-442: The correlated structure principle, which states that conceptual knowledge organization in the brain is a reflection of how often an object's properties occur, assume that the brain reflects the statistical relation of object properties and how they relate to each other. Theories based on the neural structure principle, which states that the conceptual knowledge organization in the brain is controlled by representational limits imposed by

5336-421: The damage to the semantic system, one type might be favored over the other. In many cases, there is a point where one domain is better than the other (such as the representation of living and nonliving things over feature and conceptual relationships or vice versa). Different diseases and disorders can affect the biological workings of semantic memory. A variety of studies have been done in an attempt to determine

5428-410: The diagnosis of psychiatric disorders. It also assessed recall and recognition. The child will receive a list of 15 words on a day (A) and an inference list on the following day (B). The child is tested on A immediately after list B. After a 20-minute delay, a non-verbal test is administered, followed by tests of long-delay free recall and long-delay cued recall. Afterwards a test is administered to assess

5520-794: The effects on varying aspects of semantic memory. For example, Lambon, Lowe, & Rogers studied the different effects semantic dementia and herpes simplex virus encephalitis have on semantic memory. They found that semantic dementia has a more generalized semantic impairment. Additionally, deficits in semantic memory as a result of herpes simplex virus encephalitis tend to have more category-specific impairments. Other disorders that affect semantic memory, such as Alzheimer's disease , has been observed clinically as errors in naming, recognizing, or describing objects. Whereas researchers have attributed such impairment to degradation of semantic knowledge. Various neural imaging and research points to semantic memory and episodic memory resulting from distinct areas in

5612-451: The episodic task increased from the appearance condition (.50), to the sound condition (.63), to the meaning condition (.86). The effect was also greater for the "yes" encoding words than the "no" encoding words, which suggested a strong distinction of performance of episodic and semantic tasks, supporting Tulving's hypothesis. Semantic memory's contents are not tied to any particular instance of experience, as in episodic memory. Instead, what

SECTION 60

#1732901617165

5704-405: The familiarity effect and the typicality effect. Its biggest advantage is that it clearly explains priming : information from memory is more likely to be retrieved if related information (the "prime") has been presented a short time before. There are still a number of memory phenomena for which TLC has no account, including why people are able to respond quickly to obviously false questions (like "is

5796-469: The first trial but improve as the task is repeated. Adults with limited learning capacity may perform well on early trials but reach a plateau where repeated trials do not reflect improved performance, or have inconsistent recall across trials. This can happen if they try and fail with different strategies of learning. Studies have demonstrated that inconsistent recall across trials characterises patients with amnesia caused by frontal lobe pathology. The test

5888-434: The hippocampus itself, the entorhinal cortex , and the perirhinal cortex . These latter two make up the parahippocampal cortices. Amnesiacs with damage to the hippocampus but some spared parahippocampal cortex were able to demonstrate some degree of intact semantic memory despite a total loss of episodic memory, which strongly suggests that information encoding leading to semantic memory does not have its physiological basis in

5980-447: The hippocampus. Other researchers believe the hippocampus is only involved in episodic memory and spatial cognition , which raises the question of where semantic memory may be located. Some believe semantic memory lives in the temporal cortex , while others believe that it is widely distributed across all brain areas. The hippocampal areas associate semantic memory with declarative memory. The left inferior prefrontal cortex and

6072-403: The individual's specific deficit. The first category consists of animate objects, with animals being the most common deficit. The second category consists of inanimate objects with two subcategories: fruits and vegetables (biological inanimate objects), and artifacts being the most common deficits. The type of deficit does not indicate a lack of conceptual knowledge associated with that category, as

6164-451: The items on the recognition list are distractors. A computer administration and scoring system generates scores for every measure, graphs a learning curve , and provides learning parameters, response errors and interference effects. Raw scores are used for all analyses, ultimately determining how many errors are made in each learning task. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test assesses practice effects and Spearman's rho (p) correlation coefficient

6256-523: The items' semantic relatedness . In an updated version of SAM, pre-existing semantic associations are accounted for using a semantic matrix . During the experiment, semantic associations remain fixed showing the assumption that semantic associations are not significantly impacted by the episodic experience of one experiment. The two measures used to measure semantic relatedness in this model are latent semantic analysis (LSA) and word association spaces (WAS). The LSA method states that similarity between words

6348-430: The left posterior temporal areas are other areas involved in semantic memory use. Temporal lobe damage affecting the lateral and medial cortexes have been related to semantic impairments. Damage to different areas of the brain affect semantic memory differently. Neuroimaging evidence suggests that left hippocampal areas show an increase in activity during semantic memory tasks. During semantic retrieval, two regions in

6440-470: The living things category despite the fact that musical instruments fall in the non-biological/inanimate category. However, there are also cases of biological impairment where musical instrument performance is at a normal level. Similarly, food has been shown to be impaired in those with biological category impairments. The category of food specifically can present some irregularities though because it can be natural, but it can also be highly processed, such as in

6532-562: The matrix is then transformed according to the equation: M t , d ′ = ln ⁡ ( 1 + M t , d ) − ∑ i = 0 D P ( i | t ) ln ⁡ P ( i | t ) {\displaystyle \mathbf {M} _{t,d}'={\frac {\ln {(1+\mathbf {M} _{t,d})}}{-\sum _{i=0}^{D}P(i|t)\ln {P(i|t)}}}} where P ( i | t ) {\displaystyle P(i|t)}

6624-499: The nature of the association between variables is different for different patient populations and thus the validity is different for different patient groups It has considerable support in the neuropsychological literature due to its construct validity. The test-retest reliability of the CVLT has demonstrated stability over time in healthy adults. The construct validity makes it a measure of episodic verbal learning and memory supported by

6716-491: The nodes correspond to words or word stems and the links represent syntactic relations between them. Feature models view semantic categories as being composed of relatively unstructured sets of features. The semantic feature-comparison model describes memory as being composed of feature lists for different concepts. According to this view, the relations between categories would not be directly retrieved, and would be indirectly computed instead. For example, subjects might verify

6808-474: The number of links between those nodes. The original version of TLC did not put weights on the links between nodes. This version performed comparably to humans in many tasks, but failed to predict that people would respond faster to questions regarding more typical category instances than those involving less typical instances. Allan Collins and Quillian later updated TLC to include weighted connections to account for this effect, which allowed it to explain both

6900-473: The original list. The new word list was intended to be easier, with less geographic, cultural and socioeconomic bias. The 'grocery shopping list' has been dropped in favour of an empirically -driven word list composed of words from four unrelated semantic categories. A nine-word short form has also been introduced to improve the utility of the test in assessment of patients with severe cognitive dysfunction . The CVLT-II underwent nationwide standardisation with

6992-400: The premises, instead it merely necessitates that conclusion follows from the premises without violating the correctness of the logical form . If also the premises of a valid argument are proven true, this is said to be sound . The corresponding conditional of a valid argument is a logical truth and the negation of its corresponding conditional is a contradiction . The conclusion is

7084-465: The properties of their superordinate nodes (i.e., "NOT-can fly" would be stored with "penguin"). Processing in TLC is a form of spreading activation . When a node becomes active, that activation spreads to other nodes via the links between them. In that case, the time to answer the question "Is a chicken a bird?" is a function of how far the activation between the nodes for chicken and bird must spread, or

7176-409: The recognition of words that were administered the day before. The results produce several different scores including total recall, learning strategy, serial position effect, learning rate, consistency of item recall, proactive and retroactive interference, and retention over long and short delays. Internal consistency and alpha reliabilities for the test are high (usually >0.80). Validity studies show

7268-839: The right middle frontal gyrus and the area of the right inferior temporal gyrus similarly show an increase in activity. Damage to areas involved in semantic memory result in various deficits, depending on the area and type of damage. For instance, Lambon Ralph, Lowe, & Rogers (2007) found that category-specific impairments can occur where patients have different knowledge deficits for one semantic category over another, depending on location and type of damage. Category-specific impairments might indicate that knowledge may rely differentially upon sensory and motor properties encoded in separate areas (Farah and McClelland, 1991). Category-specific impairments can involve cortical regions where living and nonliving things are represented and where feature and conceptual relationships are represented. Depending on

7360-451: The role of organization in human memory. Tulving constructed a proposal to distinguish between episodic memory and what he termed semantic memory. He was mainly influenced by the ideas of Reiff and Scheers, who in 1959 made the distinction between two primary forms of memory. One form was titled remembrances , and the other memoria . The remembrance concept dealt with memories that contained experiences of an autobiographic index, whereas

7452-401: The stable aspects of our personality while episodes of illness may have a more episodic nature. This study was not created to solely provide evidence for the distinction of semantic and episodic memory stores. However, they did use the experimental dissociation method which provides evidence for Tulving's hypothesis. In the first part, subjects were presented with a total of 60 words (one at

7544-491: The test is moderately correlated (0.32-0.4) with the WISC-R vocabulary subtest (Delis, Kramer et al. 2004). The California Verbal Learning Test-II is an updated version of the original California Verbal learning Test. The original CVLT was normed on a 'reference sample' of 273 nonclinical subjects. The original test had often been criticised as being biased towards individuals of higher education and functioning, as well as reflecting

7636-413: The tests. The great weakness of the CVLT-II is the lack of clinical data for many new indices, particularly the new forced choice discrimination task. A number of similar tests are available including: Semantic memory Semantic memory refers to general world knowledge that humans have accumulated throughout their lives. This general knowledge ( word meanings , concepts , facts, and ideas)

7728-416: The third argument becomes: An argument is termed formally valid if it has structural self-consistency, i.e. if when the operands between premises are all true, the derived conclusion is always also true. In the third example, the initial premises cannot logically result in the conclusion and is therefore categorized as an invalid argument. A formula of a formal language is a valid formula if and only if it

7820-436: The time from when the chunk was created, and increases with the number of times the chunk has been retrieved from memory. Chunks can also receive activation from Gaussian noise and from their similarity to other chunks. For example, if chicken is used as a retrieval cue, canary will receive activation by virtue of its similarity to the cue. When retrieving items from memory, ACT looks at the most active chunk in memory; if it

7912-455: The two words, the smaller the amount by which the association is incremented (specifically, Δ = 11 − d {\displaystyle \Delta =11-d} , where d {\displaystyle d} is the distance between the two words in the frame). The cognitive neuroscience of semantic memory is a controversial issue with two dominant views. Many researchers and clinicians believe that semantic memory

8004-510: The variance with loadings from free and cued recall intrusions and recognition false positives . The remaining components, learning strategy (semantic and serial clustering), serial position (primacy and recency) and proactive effect (List B recall) are inconsistent and account for little additional variance. The results can give the experimenter considerable information about personalities , different conditions and learning difficulties. For example, an anxious participant may perform poorly on

8096-409: The verification of category membership. The set of associations among a collection of items in memory is equivalent to the links between nodes in a network, where each node corresponds to a unique item in memory. Indeed, neural networks and semantic networks may be characterized as associative models of cognition. However, associations are often more clearly represented as an N × N matrix, where N

8188-530: The visual system used to identify and describe the structure of objects functions independently of an individual's conceptual knowledge base. Most of the time, these two categories are consistent with case-study data. However, there are a few exceptions to the rule. Categories like food, body parts, and musical instruments have been shown to defy the animate/inanimate or biological/non-biological categorical division. In some cases, it has been shown that musical instruments tend to be impaired in patients with damage to

8280-454: The words that immediately surround a given word. HAL computes an NxN matrix, where N is the number of words in its lexicon, using a 10-word reading frame that moves incrementally through a corpus of text. Like SAM, any time two words are simultaneously in the frame, the association between them is increased, that is, the corresponding cell in the NxN matrix is incremented. The bigger the distance between

8372-418: Was mediated through conceptual, meaning-based associations". Recent research has focused on the idea that when people access a word's meaning, sensorimotor information that is used to perceive and act on the concrete object the word suggests is automatically activated. In the theory of grounded cognition, the meaning of a particular word is grounded in the sensorimotor systems. For example, when one thinks of

8464-628: Was widely accepted, primarily because it allowed the separate conceptualization of world knowledge. Tulving discusses conceptions of episodic and semantic memory in his book titled Précis of Elements of Episodic Memory , in which he states that several factors differentiate between episodic memory and semantic memory in ways that include In 2022, researchers Felipe De Brigard, Sharda Umanath, and Muireann Irish argued that Tulving conceptualized semantic memory to be different from episodic memory in that "episodic memories were viewed as supported via spatiotemporal relations while information in semantic memory

#164835