Misplaced Pages

#566433

105-571: The trifluoromethyl group has a significant electronegativity that is often described as being intermediate between the electronegativities of fluorine and chlorine. For this reason, trifluoromethyl-substituted compounds are often strong acids, such as trifluoromethanesulfonic acid and trifluoroacetic acid . Conversely, the trifluoromethyl group lowers the basicity of compounds like trifluoroethanol . The trifluoromethyl group occurs in certain pharmaceuticals, drugs, and abiotically synthesized natural fluorocarbon based compounds. The medicinal use of

210-555: A 2 {\displaystyle \mu ({\rm {Mulliken)=-\chi ({\rm {Mulliken)={}-{\frac {E_{\rm {i}}+E_{\rm {ea}}}{2}}}}}}} A. Louis Allred and Eugene G. Rochow considered that electronegativity should be related to the charge experienced by an electron on the "surface" of an atom: The higher the charge per unit area of atomic surface the greater the tendency of that atom to attract electrons. The effective nuclear charge , Z eff , experienced by valence electrons can be estimated using Slater's rules , while

315-403: A ) + 0.19. {\displaystyle \chi =(1.97\times 10^{-3})(E_{\rm {i}}+E_{\rm {ea}})+0.19.} The Mulliken electronegativity can only be calculated for an element whose electron affinity is known. Measured values are available for 72 elements, while approximate values have been estimated or calculated for the remaining elements. The Mulliken electronegativity of an atom

420-836: A nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug . Sulfoxaflor is used as a systemic insecticide. Trifluralin , as with several dinitritroaniline herbicides, is a trifluoromethyl herbicide. Fluazifop is another, a phenoxy herbicide . The trifluoromethyl group can also be added to change the solubility of molecules containing other groups of interest. Various methods exist to introduce this functionality. Carboxylic acids can be converted to trifluoromethyl groups by treatment with sulfur tetrafluoride and trihalomethyl compounds, particularly trifluoromethyl ethers and trifluoromethyl aromatics, are converted into trifluoromethyl compounds by treatment with antimony trifluoride / antimony pentachloride (the Swarts reaction ). Another route to trifluoromethyl aromatics

525-441: A " subshell ". Because of the quantum mechanical nature of the electrons around a nucleus, atomic orbitals can be uniquely defined by a set of integers known as quantum numbers. These quantum numbers occur only in certain combinations of values, and their physical interpretation changes depending on whether real or complex versions of the atomic orbitals are employed. In physics, the most common orbital descriptions are based on

630-472: A 3d subshell but this is at higher energy than the 3s and 3p in argon (contrary to the situation for hydrogen) and remains empty. Immediately after Heisenberg discovered his uncertainty principle , Bohr noted that the existence of any sort of wave packet implies uncertainty in the wave frequency and wavelength, since a spread of frequencies is needed to create the packet itself. In quantum mechanics, where all particle momenta are associated with waves, it

735-451: A Bohr electron "wavelength" could be seen to be a function of its momentum; so a Bohr orbiting electron was seen to orbit in a circle at a multiple of its half-wavelength. The Bohr model for a short time could be seen as a classical model with an additional constraint provided by the 'wavelength' argument. However, this period was immediately superseded by the full three-dimensional wave mechanics of 1926. In our current understanding of physics,

840-424: A bond to an atom that employs an sp hybrid orbital for bonding will be more heavily polarized to that atom when the hybrid orbital has more s character. That is, when electronegativities are compared for different hybridization schemes of a given element, the order χ(sp ) < χ(sp ) < χ(sp) holds (the trend should apply to non-integer hybridization indices as well). In organic chemistry, electronegativity

945-447: A complete set of s, p, d, and f orbitals, respectively, though for higher values of quantum number n , particularly when the atom bears a positive charge, energies of certain sub-shells become very similar and so, order in which they are said to be populated by electrons (e.g., Cr = [Ar]4s 3d and Cr = [Ar]3d ) can be rationalized only somewhat arbitrarily. With the development of quantum mechanics and experimental findings (such as

1050-514: A formula for estimating energy typically has a relative error on the order of 10% but can be used to get a rough qualitative idea and understanding of a molecule. See also: Electronegativities of the elements (data page) There are no reliable sources for Pm, Eu and Yb other than the range of 1.1–1.2; see Pauling, Linus (1960). The Nature of the Chemical Bond. 3rd ed., Cornell University Press, p. 93. Robert S. Mulliken proposed that

1155-543: A molecule to attract electrons to itself". In general, electronegativity increases on passing from left to right along a period and decreases on descending a group. Hence, fluorine is the most electronegative of the elements (not counting noble gases ), whereas caesium is the least electronegative, at least of those elements for which substantial data is available. There are some exceptions to this general rule. Gallium and germanium have higher electronegativities than aluminium and silicon , respectively, because of

SECTION 10

#1732886496567

1260-563: A more accurate fit E d ( A B ) = E d ( A A ) E d ( B B ) + 1.3 ( χ A − χ B ) 2 e V {\displaystyle E_{\rm {d}}({\rm {AB}})={\sqrt {E_{\rm {d}}({\rm {AA}})E_{\rm {d}}({\rm {BB}})}}+1.3(\chi _{\rm {A}}-\chi _{\rm {B}})^{2}{\rm {eV}}} These are approximate equations but they hold with good accuracy. Pauling obtained

1365-407: A number of other chemical properties. Electronegativity cannot be directly measured and must be calculated from other atomic or molecular properties. Several methods of calculation have been proposed, and although there may be small differences in the numerical values of the electronegativity, all methods show the same periodic trends between elements . The most commonly used method of calculation

1470-468: A positively charged jelly-like substance, and between the electron's discovery and 1909, this " plum pudding model " was the most widely accepted explanation of atomic structure. Shortly after Thomson's discovery, Hantaro Nagaoka predicted a different model for electronic structure. Unlike the plum pudding model, the positive charge in Nagaoka's "Saturnian Model" was concentrated into a central core, pulling

1575-414: A relatively tiny planet (the nucleus). Atomic orbitals exactly describe the shape of this "atmosphere" only when one electron is present. When more electrons are added, the additional electrons tend to more evenly fill in a volume of space around the nucleus so that the resulting collection ("electron cloud" ) tends toward a generally spherical zone of probability describing the electron's location, because of

1680-424: A set of quantum numbers summarized in the term symbol and usually associated with particular electron configurations, i.e., by occupation schemes of atomic orbitals (for example, 1s  2s  2p for the ground state of neon -term symbol: S 0 ). This notation means that the corresponding Slater determinants have a clear higher weight in the configuration interaction expansion. The atomic orbital concept

1785-1105: A well-defined magnetic quantum number are generally complex-valued. Real-valued orbitals can be formed as linear combinations of m ℓ and −m ℓ orbitals, and are often labeled using associated harmonic polynomials (e.g., xy , x − y ) which describe their angular structure. An orbital can be occupied by a maximum of two electrons, each with its own projection of spin m s {\displaystyle m_{s}} . The simple names s orbital , p orbital , d orbital , and f orbital refer to orbitals with angular momentum quantum number ℓ = 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. These names, together with their n values, are used to describe electron configurations of atoms. They are derived from description by early spectroscopists of certain series of alkali metal spectroscopic lines as sharp , principal , diffuse , and fundamental . Orbitals for ℓ > 3 continue alphabetically (g, h, i, k, ...), omitting j because some languages do not distinguish between letters "i" and "j". Atomic orbitals are basic building blocks of

1890-481: Is actually a function of the coordinates of all the electrons, so that their motion is correlated, but this is often approximated by this independent-particle model of products of single electron wave functions. (The London dispersion force , for example, depends on the correlations of the motion of the electrons.) In atomic physics , the atomic spectral lines correspond to transitions ( quantum leaps ) between quantum states of an atom. These states are labeled by

1995-407: Is affected by both its atomic number and the distance at which its valence electrons reside from the charged nucleus. The higher the associated electronegativity, the more an atom or a substituent group attracts electrons. Electronegativity serves as a simple way to quantitatively estimate the bond energy , and the sign and magnitude of a bond's chemical polarity , which characterizes a bond along

2100-399: Is an artifact of electronegativity varying with oxidation state: its electronegativity conforms better to trends if it is quoted for the +2 state with a Pauling value of 1.87 instead of the +4 state. In inorganic chemistry, it is common to consider a single value of electronegativity to be valid for most "normal" situations. While this approach has the advantage of simplicity, it is clear that

2205-463: Is approximately additive, and hence one can introduce the electronegativity. Thus, it is these semi-empirical formulas for bond energy that underlie the concept of Pauling electronegativity. The formulas are approximate, but this rough approximation is in fact relatively good and gives the right intuition, with the notion of the polarity of the bond and some theoretical grounding in quantum mechanics. The electronegativities are then determined to best fit

SECTION 20

#1732886496567

2310-455: Is associated more with different functional groups than with individual atoms. The terms group electronegativity and substituent electronegativity are used synonymously. However, it is common to distinguish between the inductive effect and the resonance effect , which might be described as σ- and π-electronegativities, respectively. There are a number of linear free-energy relationships that have been used to quantify these effects, of which

2415-418: Is necessary to choose an arbitrary reference point in order to construct a scale. Hydrogen was chosen as the reference, as it forms covalent bonds with a large variety of elements: its electronegativity was fixed first at 2.1, later revised to 2.20. It is also necessary to decide which of the two elements is the more electronegative (equivalent to choosing one of the two possible signs for the square root). This

2520-971: Is necessary to have data on the dissociation energies of at least two types of covalent bonds formed by that element. A. L. Allred updated Pauling's original values in 1961 to take account of the greater availability of thermodynamic data, and it is these "revised Pauling" values of the electronegativity that are most often used. The essential point of Pauling electronegativity is that there is an underlying, quite accurate, semi-empirical formula for dissociation energies, namely: E d ( A B ) = E d ( A A ) + E d ( B B ) 2 + ( χ A − χ B ) 2 e V {\displaystyle E_{\rm {d}}({\rm {AB}})={\frac {E_{\rm {d}}({\rm {AA}})+E_{\rm {d}}({\rm {BB}})}{2}}+(\chi _{\rm {A}}-\chi _{\rm {B}})^{2}{\rm {eV}}} or sometimes,

2625-436: Is one indication of the number of chemical properties that might be affected by electronegativity. The most obvious application of electronegativities is in the discussion of bond polarity , for which the concept was introduced by Pauling. In general, the greater the difference in electronegativity between two atoms the more polar the bond that will be formed between them, with the atom having the higher electronegativity being at

2730-454: Is represented by its numerical value, but ℓ {\displaystyle \ell } is represented by a letter as follows: 0 is represented by 's', 1 by 'p', 2 by 'd', 3 by 'f', and 4 by 'g'. For instance, one may speak of the subshell with n = 2 {\displaystyle n=2} and ℓ = 0 {\displaystyle \ell =0} as a '2s subshell'. Each electron also has angular momentum in

2835-644: Is sometimes said to be the negative of the chemical potential . By inserting the energetic definitions of the ionization potential and electron affinity into the Mulliken electronegativity, it is possible to show that the Mulliken chemical potential is a finite difference approximation of the electronic energy with respect to the number of electrons., i.e., μ ( M u l l i k e n ) = − χ ( M u l l i k e n ) = − E i + E e

2940-496: Is that originally proposed by Linus Pauling. This gives a dimensionless quantity , commonly referred to as the Pauling scale ( χ r ), on a relative scale running from 0.79 to 3.98 ( hydrogen  = 2.20). When other methods of calculation are used, it is conventional (although not obligatory) to quote the results on a scale that covers the same range of numerical values: this is known as an electronegativity in Pauling units . As it

3045-418: Is the formation of such a wave packet which localizes the wave, and thus the particle, in space. In states where a quantum mechanical particle is bound, it must be localized as a wave packet, and the existence of the packet and its minimum size implies a spread and minimal value in particle wavelength, and thus also momentum and energy. In quantum mechanics, as a particle is localized to a smaller region in space,

3150-428: Is the reaction of aryl iodides with trifluoromethyl copper . Finally, trifluoromethyl carbonyls can be prepared by reaction of aldehydes and esters with Ruppert's reagent . Electronegativity Electronegativity , symbolized as χ , is the tendency for an atom of a given chemical element to attract shared electrons (or electron density ) when forming a chemical bond . An atom's electronegativity

3255-498: Is therefore a key concept for visualizing the excitation process associated with a given transition . For example, one can say for a given transition that it corresponds to the excitation of an electron from an occupied orbital to a given unoccupied orbital. Nevertheless, one has to keep in mind that electrons are fermions ruled by the Pauli exclusion principle and cannot be distinguished from each other. Moreover, it sometimes happens that

Trifluoromethyl group - Misplaced Pages Continue

3360-417: Is usually calculated, electronegativity is not a property of an atom alone, but rather a property of an atom in a molecule . Even so, the electronegativity of an atom is strongly correlated with the first ionization energy . The electronegativity is slightly negatively correlated (for smaller electronegativity values) and rather strongly positively correlated (for most and larger electronegativity values) with

3465-492: Is usually done using "chemical intuition": in the above example, hydrogen bromide dissolves in water to form H and Br ions, so it may be assumed that bromine is more electronegative than hydrogen. However, in principle, since the same electronegativities should be obtained for any two bonding compounds, the data are in fact overdetermined, and the signs are unique once a reference point has been fixed (usually, for H or F). To calculate Pauling electronegativity for an element, it

3570-427: The n = 2  shell has only orbitals with ℓ = 0 {\displaystyle \ell =0} , and ℓ = 1 {\displaystyle \ell =1} . The set of orbitals associated with a particular value of  ℓ are sometimes collectively called a subshell . The magnetic quantum number , m ℓ {\displaystyle m_{\ell }} , describes

3675-520: The Bohr model where it determines the radius of each circular electron orbit. In modern quantum mechanics however, n determines the mean distance of the electron from the nucleus; all electrons with the same value of n lie at the same average distance. For this reason, orbitals with the same value of n are said to comprise a " shell ". Orbitals with the same value of n and also the same value of  ℓ are even more closely related, and are said to comprise

3780-3110: The Condon–Shortley phase convention , real orbitals are related to complex orbitals in the same way that the real spherical harmonics are related to complex spherical harmonics. Letting ψ n , ℓ , m {\displaystyle \psi _{n,\ell ,m}} denote a complex orbital with quantum numbers n , ℓ , and m , the real orbitals ψ n , ℓ , m real {\displaystyle \psi _{n,\ell ,m}^{\text{real}}} may be defined by ψ n , ℓ , m real = { 2 ( − 1 ) m Im { ψ n , ℓ , | m | }  for  m < 0 ψ n , ℓ , | m |  for  m = 0 2 ( − 1 ) m Re { ψ n , ℓ , | m | }  for  m > 0 = { i 2 ( ψ n , ℓ , − | m | − ( − 1 ) m ψ n , ℓ , | m | )  for  m < 0 ψ n , ℓ , | m |  for  m = 0 1 2 ( ψ n , ℓ , − | m | + ( − 1 ) m ψ n , ℓ , | m | )  for  m > 0 {\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\psi _{n,\ell ,m}^{\text{real}}&={\begin{cases}{\sqrt {2}}(-1)^{m}{\text{Im}}\left\{\psi _{n,\ell ,|m|}\right\}&{\text{ for }}m<0\\[2pt]\psi _{n,\ell ,|m|}&{\text{ for }}m=0\\[2pt]{\sqrt {2}}(-1)^{m}{\text{Re}}\left\{\psi _{n,\ell ,|m|}\right\}&{\text{ for }}m>0\end{cases}}\\[4pt]&={\begin{cases}{\frac {i}{\sqrt {2}}}\left(\psi _{n,\ell ,-|m|}-(-1)^{m}\psi _{n,\ell ,|m|}\right)&{\text{ for }}m<0\\[2pt]\psi _{n,\ell ,|m|}&{\text{ for }}m=0\\[4pt]{\frac {1}{\sqrt {2}}}\left(\psi _{n,\ell ,-|m|}+(-1)^{m}\psi _{n,\ell ,|m|}\right)&{\text{ for }}m>0\end{cases}}\end{aligned}}} If ψ n , ℓ , m ( r , θ , ϕ ) = R n l ( r ) Y ℓ m ( θ , ϕ ) {\displaystyle \psi _{n,\ell ,m}(r,\theta ,\phi )=R_{nl}(r)Y_{\ell }^{m}(\theta ,\phi )} , with R n l ( r ) {\displaystyle R_{nl}(r)}

3885-467: The Hammett equation is the best known. Kabachnik Parameters are group electronegativities for use in organophosphorus chemistry . Electropositivity is a measure of an element's ability to donate electrons , and therefore form positive ions ; thus, it is antipode to electronegativity. Mainly, this is an attribute of metals , meaning that, in general, the greater the metallic character of an element

3990-580: The Hartree–Fock approximation, which is one way to reduce the complexities of molecular orbital theory . Atomic orbitals can be the hydrogen-like "orbitals" which are exact solutions to the Schrödinger equation for a hydrogen-like "atom" (i.e., atom with one electron). Alternatively, atomic orbitals refer to functions that depend on the coordinates of one electron (i.e., orbitals) but are used as starting points for approximating wave functions that depend on

4095-418: The Pauli exclusion principle . Thus the n  = 1 state can hold one or two electrons, while the n = 2 state can hold up to eight electrons in 2s and 2p subshells. In helium, all n  = 1 states are fully occupied; the same is true for n  = 1 and n  = 2 in neon. In argon, the 3s and 3p subshells are similarly fully occupied by eight electrons; quantum mechanics also allows

4200-473: The arithmetic mean of the first ionization energy (E i ) and the electron affinity (E ea ) should be a measure of the tendency of an atom to attract electrons: χ = E i + E e a 2 {\displaystyle \chi ={\frac {E_{\rm {i}}+E_{\rm {ea}}}{2}}} As this definition is not dependent on an arbitrary relative scale, it has also been termed absolute electronegativity , with

4305-441: The atom's nucleus , and can be used to calculate the probability of finding an electron in a specific region around the nucleus. Each orbital in an atom is characterized by a set of values of three quantum numbers n , ℓ , and m ℓ , which respectively correspond to electron's energy, its orbital angular momentum , and its orbital angular momentum projected along a chosen axis ( magnetic quantum number ). The orbitals with

Trifluoromethyl group - Misplaced Pages Continue

4410-507: The atomic orbital model (or electron cloud or wave mechanics model), a modern framework for visualizing submicroscopic behavior of electrons in matter. In this model, the electron cloud of an atom may be seen as being built up (in approximation) in an electron configuration that is a product of simpler hydrogen-like atomic orbitals. The repeating periodicity of blocks of 2, 6, 10, and 14 elements within sections of periodic table arises naturally from total number of electrons that occupy

4515-415: The atomic shells (the more electrons an atom has, the farther from the nucleus the valence electrons will be, and as a result, the less positive charge they will experience—both because of their increased distance from the nucleus and because the other electrons in the lower energy core orbitals will act to shield the valence electrons from the positively charged nucleus). The term "electronegativity"

4620-1037: The covalent bond between two different atoms (A–B) is stronger than the average of the A–A and the B–B bonds. According to valence bond theory , of which Pauling was a notable proponent, this "additional stabilization" of the heteronuclear bond is due to the contribution of ionic canonical forms to the bonding. The difference in electronegativity between atoms A and B is given by: | χ A − χ B | = ( e V ) − 1 / 2 E d ( A B ) − E d ( A A ) + E d ( B B ) 2 {\displaystyle |\chi _{\rm {A}}-\chi _{\rm {B}}|=({\rm {eV}})^{-1/2}{\sqrt {E_{\rm {d}}({\rm {AB}})-{\frac {E_{\rm {d}}({\rm {AA}})+E_{\rm {d}}({\rm {BB}})}{2}}}}} where

4725-488: The d-block contraction . Elements of the fourth period immediately after the first row of the transition metals have unusually small atomic radii because the 3d-electrons are not effective at shielding the increased nuclear charge, and smaller atomic size correlates with higher electronegativity (see Allred-Rochow electronegativity and Sanderson electronegativity above). The anomalously high electronegativity of lead , in particular when compared to thallium and bismuth ,

4830-496: The dissociation energies , E d , of the A–B, A–A and B–B bonds are expressed in electronvolts , the factor (eV) being included to ensure a dimensionless result. Hence, the difference in Pauling electronegativity between hydrogen and bromine is 0.73 (dissociation energies: H–Br, 3.79 eV; H–H, 4.52 eV; Br–Br 2.00 eV) As only differences in electronegativity are defined, it

4935-443: The electron affinity . It is to be expected that the electronegativity of an element will vary with its chemical environment, but it is usually considered to be a transferable property , that is to say that similar values will be valid in a variety of situations. Caesium is the least electronegative element (0.79); fluorine is the most (3.98). Pauling first proposed the concept of electronegativity in 1932 to explain why

5040-456: The emission and absorption spectra of atoms became an increasingly useful tool in the understanding of electrons in atoms. The most prominent feature of emission and absorption spectra (known experimentally since the middle of the 19th century), was that these atomic spectra contained discrete lines. The significance of the Bohr model was that it related the lines in emission and absorption spectra to

5145-426: The periodic table . The stationary states ( quantum states ) of a hydrogen-like atom are its atomic orbitals. However, in general, an electron's behavior is not fully described by a single orbital. Electron states are best represented by time-depending "mixtures" ( linear combinations ) of multiple orbitals. See Linear combination of atomic orbitals molecular orbital method . The quantum number n first appeared in

5250-502: The uncertainty principle . One should remember that these orbital 'states', as described here, are merely eigenstates of an electron in its orbit. An actual electron exists in a superposition of states, which is like a weighted average , but with complex number weights. So, for instance, an electron could be in a pure eigenstate (2, 1, 0), or a mixed state ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ (2, 1, 0) + ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ i {\displaystyle i} (2, 1, 1), or even

5355-458: The 2p subshell of an atom contains 4 electrons. This subshell has 3 orbitals, each with n = 2 and ℓ = 1. There is also another, less common system still used in X-ray science known as X-ray notation , which is a continuation of the notations used before orbital theory was well understood. In this system, the principal quantum number is given a letter associated with it. For n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... ,

SECTION 50

#1732886496567

5460-402: The Bohr model is called a semi-classical model because of its quantization of angular momentum, not primarily because of its relationship with electron wavelength, which appeared in hindsight a dozen years after the Bohr model was proposed. The Bohr model was able to explain the emission and absorption spectra of hydrogen . The energies of electrons in the n  = 1, 2, 3, etc. states in

5565-423: The Bohr model match those of current physics. However, this did not explain similarities between different atoms, as expressed by the periodic table, such as the fact that helium (two electrons), neon (10 electrons), and argon (18 electrons) exhibit similar chemical inertness. Modern quantum mechanics explains this in terms of electron shells and subshells which can each hold a number of electrons determined by

5670-662: The accuracy of hydrogen-like orbitals. The term orbital was introduced by Robert S. Mulliken in 1932 as short for one-electron orbital wave function . Niels Bohr explained around 1913 that electrons might revolve around a compact nucleus with definite angular momentum. Bohr's model was an improvement on the 1911 explanations of Ernest Rutherford , that of the electron moving around a nucleus. Japanese physicist Hantaro Nagaoka published an orbit-based hypothesis for electron behavior as early as 1904. These theories were each built upon new observations starting with simple understanding and becoming more correct and complex. Explaining

5775-515: The associated compressed wave packet requires a larger and larger range of momenta, and thus larger kinetic energy. Thus the binding energy to contain or trap a particle in a smaller region of space increases without bound as the region of space grows smaller. Particles cannot be restricted to a geometric point in space, since this would require infinite particle momentum. In chemistry, Erwin Schrödinger , Linus Pauling , Mulliken and others noted that

5880-399: The atom fixed the problem of energy loss from radiation from a ground state (by declaring that there was no state below this), and more importantly explained the origin of spectral lines. After Bohr's use of Einstein 's explanation of the photoelectric effect to relate energy levels in atoms with the wavelength of emitted light, the connection between the structure of electrons in atoms and

5985-547: The atomic orbitals are the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian operator for the energy. They can be obtained analytically, meaning that the resulting orbitals are products of a polynomial series, and exponential and trigonometric functions . (see hydrogen atom ). For atoms with two or more electrons, the governing equations can be solved only with the use of methods of iterative approximation. Orbitals of multi-electron atoms are qualitatively similar to those of hydrogen, and in

6090-426: The average energy of the valence electrons in a free atom, χ = n s ε s + n p ε p n s + n p {\displaystyle \chi ={n_{\rm {s}}\varepsilon _{\rm {s}}+n_{\rm {p}}\varepsilon _{\rm {p}} \over n_{\rm {s}}+n_{\rm {p}}}} where ε s,p are

6195-503: The behavior of these electron "orbits" was one of the driving forces behind the development of quantum mechanics . With J. J. Thomson 's discovery of the electron in 1897, it became clear that atoms were not the smallest building blocks of nature , but were rather composite particles. The newly discovered structure within atoms tempted many to imagine how the atom's constituent parts might interact with each other. Thomson theorized that multiple electrons revolve in orbit-like rings within

6300-444: The bond. The geometric mean is approximately equal to the arithmetic mean —which is applied in the first formula above—when the energies are of a similar value, e.g., except for the highly electropositive elements, where there is a larger difference of two dissociation energies; the geometric mean is more accurate and almost always gives positive excess energy, due to ionic bonding. The square root of this excess energy, Pauling notes,

6405-557: The bulk of the atomic mass was tightly condensed into a nucleus, which was also found to be positively charged. It became clear from his analysis in 1911 that the plum pudding model could not explain atomic structure. In 1913, Rutherford's post-doctoral student, Niels Bohr , proposed a new model of the atom, wherein electrons orbited the nucleus with classical periods, but were permitted to have only discrete values of angular momentum, quantized in units ħ . This constraint automatically allowed only certain electron energies. The Bohr model of

SECTION 60

#1732886496567

6510-509: The calculation of Pauling electronegativities. More convincing are the correlations between electronegativity and chemical shifts in NMR spectroscopy or isomer shifts in Mössbauer spectroscopy (see figure). Both these measurements depend on the s-electron density at the nucleus, and so are a good indication that the different measures of electronegativity really are describing "the ability of an atom in

6615-401: The concept of electronegativity equalization , which suggests that electrons distribute themselves around a molecule to minimize or to equalize the Mulliken electronegativity. This behavior is analogous to the equalization of chemical potential in macroscopic thermodynamics. Perhaps the simplest definition of electronegativity is that of Leland C. Allen, who has proposed that it is related to

6720-465: The configuration interaction expansion converges very slowly and that one cannot speak about simple one-determinant wave function at all. This is the case when electron correlation is large. Fundamentally, an atomic orbital is a one-electron wave function, even though many electrons are not in one-electron atoms, and so the one-electron view is an approximation. When thinking about orbitals, we are often given an orbital visualization heavily influenced by

6825-440: The consequence of Heisenberg's relation was that the electron, as a wave packet, could not be considered to have an exact location in its orbital. Max Born suggested that the electron's position needed to be described by a probability distribution which was connected with finding the electron at some point in the wave-function which described its associated wave packet. The new quantum mechanics did not give exact results, but only

6930-429: The continuous scale from covalent to ionic bonding . The loosely defined term electropositivity is the opposite of electronegativity: it characterizes an element's tendency to donate valence electrons. On the most basic level, electronegativity is determined by factors like the nuclear charge (the more protons an atom has, the more "pull" it will have on electrons) and the number and location of other electrons in

7035-486: The data. In more complex compounds, there is an additional error since electronegativity depends on the molecular environment of an atom. Also, the energy estimate can be only used for single, not for multiple bonds. The enthalpy of formation of a molecule containing only single bonds can subsequently be estimated based on an electronegativity table, and it depends on the constituents and the sum of squares of differences of electronegativities of all pairs of bonded atoms. Such

7140-587: The electronegativity of an element is not an invariable atomic property and, in particular, increases with the oxidation state of the element. Allred used the Pauling method to calculate separate electronegativities for different oxidation states of the handful of elements (including tin and lead) for which sufficient data were available. However, for most elements, there are not enough different covalent compounds for which bond dissociation energies are known to make this approach feasible. The chemical effects of this increase in electronegativity can be seen both in

7245-587: The electrons into circular orbits reminiscent of Saturn's rings. Few people took notice of Nagaoka's work at the time, and Nagaoka himself recognized a fundamental defect in the theory even at its conception, namely that a classical charged object cannot sustain orbital motion because it is accelerating and therefore loses energy due to electromagnetic radiation. Nevertheless, the Saturnian model turned out to have more in common with modern theory than any of its contemporaries. In 1909, Ernest Rutherford discovered that

7350-419: The energy differences between the orbits that electrons could take around an atom. This was, however, not achieved by Bohr through giving the electrons some kind of wave-like properties, since the idea that electrons could behave as matter waves was not suggested until eleven years later. Still, the Bohr model's use of quantized angular momenta and therefore quantized energy levels was a significant step toward

7455-658: The estimation of electronegativities for elements that cannot be treated by the other methods, e.g. francium , which has an Allen electronegativity of 0.67. However, it is not clear what should be considered to be valence electrons for the d- and f-block elements, which leads to an ambiguity for their electronegativities calculated by the Allen method. On this scale, neon has the highest electronegativity of all elements, followed by fluorine , helium , and oxygen . The wide variety of methods of calculation of electronegativities, which all give results that correlate well with one another,

7560-407: The first equation by noting that a bond can be approximately represented as a quantum mechanical superposition of a covalent bond and two ionic bond-states. The covalent energy of a bond is approximate, by quantum mechanical calculations, the geometric mean of the two energies of covalent bonds of the same molecules, and there is additional energy that comes from ionic factors, i.e. polar character of

7665-411: The form of quantum mechanical spin given by spin s = ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ . Its projection along a specified axis is given by the spin magnetic quantum number , m s , which can be + ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ or − ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ . These values are also called "spin up" or "spin down" respectively. The Pauli exclusion principle states that no two electrons in an atom can have

7770-537: The greater the electropositivity. Therefore, the alkali metals are the most electropositive of all. This is because they have a single electron in their outer shell and, as this is relatively far from the nucleus of the atom, it is easily lost; in other words, these metals have low ionization energies . While electronegativity increases along periods in the periodic table , and decreases down groups , electropositivity decreases along periods (from left to right) and increases down groups. This means that elements in

7875-413: The individual numbers and letters: "'one' 'ess'") is the lowest energy level ( n = 1 ) and has an angular quantum number of ℓ = 0 , denoted as s. Orbitals with ℓ = 1, 2 and 3 are denoted as p, d and f respectively. The set of orbitals for a given n and ℓ is called a subshell , denoted The superscript y shows the number of electrons in the subshell. For example, the notation 2p indicates that

7980-665: The integer values in the range − ℓ ≤ m ℓ ≤ ℓ {\displaystyle -\ell \leq m_{\ell }\leq \ell } . The above results may be summarized in the following table. Each cell represents a subshell, and lists the values of m ℓ {\displaystyle m_{\ell }} available in that subshell. Empty cells represent subshells that do not exist. Subshells are usually identified by their n {\displaystyle n} - and ℓ {\displaystyle \ell } -values. n {\displaystyle n}

8085-439: The letters associated with those numbers are K, L, M, N, O, ... respectively. The simplest atomic orbitals are those that are calculated for systems with a single electron, such as the hydrogen atom . An atom of any other element ionized down to a single electron (He , Li , etc.) is very similar to hydrogen, and the orbitals take the same form. In the Schrödinger equation for this system of one negative and one positive particle,

8190-410: The math. You can choose a different basis of eigenstates by superimposing eigenstates from any other basis (see Real orbitals below). Atomic orbitals may be defined more precisely in formal quantum mechanical language. They are approximate solutions to the Schrödinger equation for the electrons bound to the atom by the electric field of the atom's nucleus . Specifically, in quantum mechanics,

8295-404: The mixed state ⁠ 2 / 5 ⁠ (2, 1, 0) + ⁠ 3 / 5 ⁠ i {\displaystyle i} (2, 1, 1). For each eigenstate, a property has an eigenvalue . So, for the three states just mentioned, the value of n {\displaystyle n} is 2, and the value of l {\displaystyle l} is 1. For the second and third states,

8400-411: The model is most useful when applied to physical systems that share these symmetries. The Stern–Gerlach experiment —where an atom is exposed to a magnetic field—provides one such example. Instead of the complex orbitals described above, it is common, especially in the chemistry literature, to use real atomic orbitals. These real orbitals arise from simple linear combinations of complex orbitals. Using

8505-417: The negative charge being shared among a larger number of oxygen atoms, which would lead to a difference in p K a of log 10 ( 1 ⁄ 4 ) = –0.6 between hypochlorous acid and perchloric acid . As the oxidation state of the central chlorine atom increases, more electron density is drawn from the oxygen atoms onto the chlorine, diminishing the partial negative charge of individual oxygen atoms. At

8610-471: The negative end of the dipole. Pauling proposed an equation to relate the "ionic character" of a bond to the difference in electronegativity of the two atoms, although this has fallen somewhat into disuse. Several correlations have been shown between infrared stretching frequencies of certain bonds and the electronegativities of the atoms involved: however, this is not surprising as such stretching frequencies depend in part on bond strength, which enters into

8715-420: The one-electron energies of s- and p-electrons in the free atom and n s,p are the number of s- and p-electrons in the valence shell. The one-electron energies can be determined directly from spectroscopic data , and so electronegativities calculated by this method are sometimes referred to as spectroscopic electronegativities . The necessary data are available for almost all elements, and this method allows

8820-473: The orbital angular momentum of each electron and is a non-negative integer. Within a shell where n is some integer n 0 , ℓ ranges across all (integer) values satisfying the relation 0 ≤ ℓ ≤ n 0 − 1 {\displaystyle 0\leq \ell \leq n_{0}-1} . For instance, the n = 1  shell has only orbitals with ℓ = 0 {\displaystyle \ell =0} , and

8925-424: The probabilities for the occurrence of a variety of possible such results. Heisenberg held that the path of a moving particle has no meaning if we cannot observe it, as we cannot with electrons in an atom. In the quantum picture of Heisenberg, Schrödinger and others, the Bohr atom number  n for each orbital became known as an n-sphere in a three-dimensional atom and was pictured as the most probable energy of

9030-423: The probability cloud of the electron's wave packet which surrounded the atom. Orbitals have been given names, which are usually given in the form: where X is the energy level corresponding to the principal quantum number n ; type is a lower-case letter denoting the shape or subshell of the orbital, corresponding to the angular momentum quantum number   ℓ . For example, the orbital 1s (pronounced as

9135-450: The projection of the orbital angular momentum along a chosen axis. It determines the magnitude of the current circulating around that axis and the orbital contribution to the magnetic moment of an electron via the Ampèrian loop model. Within a subshell ℓ {\displaystyle \ell } , m ℓ {\displaystyle m_{\ell }} obtains

9240-545: The radial functions  R ( r ) which can be chosen as a starting point for the calculation of the properties of atoms and molecules with many electrons: Although hydrogen-like orbitals are still used as pedagogical tools, the advent of computers has made STOs preferable for atoms and diatomic molecules since combinations of STOs can replace the nodes in hydrogen-like orbitals. Gaussians are typically used in molecules with three or more atoms. Although not as accurate by themselves as STOs, combinations of many Gaussians can attain

9345-498: The radial part of the orbital, this definition is equivalent to ψ n , ℓ , m real ( r , θ , ϕ ) = R n l ( r ) Y ℓ m ( θ , ϕ ) {\displaystyle \psi _{n,\ell ,m}^{\text{real}}(r,\theta ,\phi )=R_{nl}(r)Y_{\ell m}(\theta ,\phi )} where Y ℓ m {\displaystyle Y_{\ell m}}

9450-470: The relationship between Mulliken electronegativity and atomic size, and has proposed a method of calculation based on the reciprocal of the atomic volume. With a knowledge of bond lengths, Sanderson's model allows the estimation of bond energies in a wide range of compounds. Sanderson's model has also been used to calculate molecular geometry, s -electron energy, NMR spin-spin coupling constants and other parameters for organic compounds. This work underlies

9555-402: The same time, the positive partial charge on the hydrogen increases with a higher oxidation state. This explains the observed increased acidity with an increasing oxidation state in the oxoacids of chlorine. The electronegativity of an atom changes depending on the hybridization of the orbital employed in bonding. Electrons in s orbitals are held more tightly than electrons in p orbitals. Hence,

9660-530: The same values of all four quantum numbers. If there are two electrons in an orbital with given values for three quantum numbers, ( n , ℓ , m ), these two electrons must differ in their spin projection m s . The above conventions imply a preferred axis (for example, the z direction in Cartesian coordinates), and they also imply a preferred direction along this preferred axis. Otherwise there would be no sense in distinguishing m = +1 from m = −1 . As such,

9765-406: The simplest models, they are taken to have the same form. For more rigorous and precise analysis, numerical approximations must be used. A given (hydrogen-like) atomic orbital is identified by unique values of three quantum numbers: n , ℓ , and m ℓ . The rules restricting the values of the quantum numbers, and their energies (see below), explain the electron configuration of the atoms and

9870-683: The simultaneous coordinates of all the electrons in an atom or molecule. The coordinate systems chosen for orbitals are usually spherical coordinates ( r ,  θ ,  φ ) in atoms and Cartesian ( x ,  y ,  z ) in polyatomic molecules. The advantage of spherical coordinates here is that an orbital wave function is a product of three factors each dependent on a single coordinate: ψ ( r ,  θ ,  φ ) = R ( r ) Θ( θ ) Φ( φ ) . The angular factors of atomic orbitals Θ( θ ) Φ( φ ) generate s, p, d, etc. functions as real combinations of spherical harmonics Y ℓm ( θ ,  φ ) (where ℓ and m are quantum numbers). There are typically three mathematical forms for

9975-639: The solutions to the hydrogen atom, where orbitals are given by the product between a radial function and a pure spherical harmonic . The quantum numbers, together with the rules governing their possible values, are as follows: The principal quantum number n describes the energy of the electron and is always a positive integer . In fact, it can be any positive integer, but for reasons discussed below, large numbers are seldom encountered. Each atom has, in general, many orbitals associated with each value of n ; these orbitals together are sometimes called electron shells . The azimuthal quantum number ℓ describes

10080-450: The state of an atom, i.e., an eigenstate of the atomic Hamiltonian , is approximated by an expansion (see configuration interaction expansion and basis set ) into linear combinations of anti-symmetrized products ( Slater determinants ) of one-electron functions. The spatial components of these one-electron functions are called atomic orbitals. (When one considers also their spin component, one speaks of atomic spin orbitals .) A state

10185-418: The structures of oxides and halides and in the acidity of oxides and oxoacids. Hence CrO 3 and Mn 2 O 7 are acidic oxides with low melting points , while Cr 2 O 3 is amphoteric and Mn 2 O 3 is a completely basic oxide . The effect can also be clearly seen in the dissociation constants p K a of the oxoacids of chlorine . The effect is much larger than could be explained by

10290-433: The surface area of an atom in a molecule can be taken to be proportional to the square of the covalent radius , r cov . When r cov is expressed in picometres , χ = 3590 Z e f f r c o v 2 + 0.744 {\displaystyle \chi =3590{{Z_{\rm {eff}}} \over {r_{\rm {cov}}^{2}}}+0.744} R.T. Sanderson has also noted

10395-565: The trifloromethyl group dates from 1928, although research became more intense in the mid-1940s. The trifluoromethyl group is often used as a bioisostere to create derivatives by replacing a chloride or a methyl group. This can be used to adjust the steric and electronic properties of a lead compound , or to protect a reactive methyl group from metabolic oxidation. Some notable drugs containing trifluoromethyl groups include efavirenz (Sustiva), an HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor; fluoxetine (Prozac), an antidepressant; and celecoxib (Celebrex),

10500-472: The two slit diffraction of electrons), it was found that the electrons orbiting a nucleus could not be fully described as particles, but needed to be explained by wave–particle duality . In this sense, electrons have the following properties: Wave-like properties: Particle-like properties: Thus, electrons cannot be described simply as solid particles. An analogy might be that of a large and often oddly shaped "atmosphere" (the electron), distributed around

10605-411: The understanding of electrons in atoms, and also a significant step towards the development of quantum mechanics in suggesting that quantized restraints must account for all discontinuous energy levels and spectra in atoms. With de Broglie 's suggestion of the existence of electron matter waves in 1924, and for a short time before the full 1926 Schrödinger equation treatment of hydrogen-like atoms ,

10710-640: The units of kilojoules per mole or electronvolts . However, it is more usual to use a linear transformation to transform these absolute values into values that resemble the more familiar Pauling values. For ionization energies and electron affinities in electronvolts, χ = 0.187 ( E i + E e a ) + 0.17 {\displaystyle \chi =0.187(E_{\rm {i}}+E_{\rm {ea}})+0.17\,} and for energies in kilojoules per mole, χ = ( 1.97 × 10 − 3 ) ( E i + E e

10815-489: The upper right of the periodic table of elements (oxygen, sulfur, chlorine, etc.) will have the greatest electronegativity, and those in the lower-left (rubidium, caesium, and francium) the greatest electropositivity. Atomic orbital In quantum mechanics , an atomic orbital ( / ˈ ɔːr b ɪ t ə l / ) is a function describing the location and wave-like behavior of an electron in an atom . This function describes an electron's charge distribution around

10920-579: The value for m l {\displaystyle m_{l}} is a superposition of 0 and 1. As a superposition of states, it is ambiguous—either exactly 0 or exactly 1—not an intermediate or average value like the fraction ⁠ 1 / 2 ⁠ . A superposition of eigenstates (2, 1, 1) and (3, 2, 1) would have an ambiguous n {\displaystyle n} and l {\displaystyle l} , but m l {\displaystyle m_{l}} would definitely be 1. Eigenstates make it easier to deal with

11025-415: Was introduced by Jöns Jacob Berzelius in 1811, though the concept was known before that and was studied by many chemists including Avogadro . In spite of its long history, an accurate scale of electronegativity was not developed until 1932, when Linus Pauling proposed an electronegativity scale which depends on bond energies, as a development of valence bond theory . It has been shown to correlate with

#566433